This situation where each voter is not equal in the number of votes they control is called:

Similar documents
This situation where each voter is not equal in the number of votes they control is called:

The Mathematics of Power: Weighted Voting

In this lecture, we will explore weighted voting systems further. Examples of shortcuts to determining winning coalitions and critical players.

Check off these skills when you feel that you have mastered them. Identify if a dictator exists in a given weighted voting system.

Chapter 11. Weighted Voting Systems. For All Practical Purposes: Effective Teaching

2 The Mathematics of Power. 2.1 An Introduction to Weighted Voting 2.2 The Banzhaf Power Index. Topic 2 // Lesson 02

Lecture 7 A Special Class of TU games: Voting Games

Homework 4 solutions

Math for Liberal Arts MAT 110: Chapter 12 Notes

12.3 Weighted Voting Systems

Warm-up Day 3 Given these preference schedules, identify the Plurality, Borda, Runoff, Sequential Runoff, and Condorcet winners.

Fairness Criteria. Review: Election Methods

On Axiomatization of Power Index of Veto

Kybernetika. František Turnovec Fair majorities in proportional voting. Terms of use: Persistent URL:

A Mathematical View on Voting and Power

NOTES. Power Distribution in Four-Player Weighted Voting Systems

Warm-up Day 3. Phones OFF and in pockets! 1) Given these preference schedules, identify the Condorcet, Runoff, and Sequential Runoff winners.

MATH 1340 Mathematics & Politics

Weighted Voting. Lecture 12 Section 2.1. Robb T. Koether. Hampden-Sydney College. Fri, Sep 15, 2017

Thema Working Paper n Université de Cergy Pontoise, France

Math of Election APPORTIONMENT

Louis M. Edwards Mathematics Super Bowl Valencia Community College -- April 30, 2004

Weighted Voting. Lecture 13 Section 2.1. Robb T. Koether. Hampden-Sydney College. Mon, Feb 12, 2018

APPLICATION: PIVOTAL POLITICS

BOOK REVIEW BY DAVID RAMSEY, UNIVERSITY OF LIMERICK, IRELAND

Power in Voting Games and Canadian Politics

Mathematics of the Electoral College. Robbie Robinson Professor of Mathematics The George Washington University

Seminar on Applications of Mathematics: Voting. EDB Hong Kong Science Museum,

The Impact of Turkey s Membership on EU Voting. Richard Baldwin and Mika Widgrén. Abstract

A comparison between the methods of apportionment using power indices: the case of the U.S. presidential election

A Geometric and Combinatorial Interpretation of Weighted Games

Voting and Apportionment(Due with Final Exam)

For the Encyclopedia of Power, ed. by Keith Dowding (SAGE Publications) Nicholas R. Miller 3/28/07. Voting Power in the U.S.

The Electoral College

An empirical comparison of the performance of classical power indices. Dennis Leech

Notes for Session 7 Basic Voting Theory and Arrow s Theorem

Turkey: Economic Reform and Accession to the European Union

Two-dimensional voting bodies: The case of European Parliament

Coalitional Game Theory

A Theory of Spoils Systems. Roy Gardner. September 1985

The Election What is the function of the electoral college today? What are the flaws in the electoral college?

A priori veto power of the president of Poland Jacek W. Mercik 12

Three Branches, One Government

Who benefits from the US withdrawal of the Kyoto protocol?

The Integer Arithmetic of Legislative Dynamics

AP Comparative Government and Politics

due date: Monday, August 29 (first day of school) estimated time: 3-4 hours (for planning purposes only; work until you finish)

POWER VOTING. Degree Thesis BY NIKÉ S. PANTA. BSc Mathematics Mathematical Analyst Specialisation. Supervisor:

DE FACTO CONTROL: APPLYING GAME THEORY TO THE LAW ON CORPORATE NATIONALITY. By Russell Stanley Q. Geronimo *

REPRESENTATIVE DEMOCRACY - HOW TO ACHIEVE IT

One Man, Votes: A Mathematical Analysis of the Electoral College

Lecture 8 A Special Class of TU games: Voting Games

Allocation of Seats and Voting Power in the Norwegian Parliament

A New Method of the Single Transferable Vote and its Axiomatic Justification

Chapter 1 Practice Test Questions

Presidential Election Democrat Grover Cleveland versus Benjamin Harrison. ************************************ Difference of 100,456

Campaign Strategy Script

Article I. Article III. Article IV. Article V. Article VI. Article VII

House Copy OLS Copy Public Copy For Official House Use BILL NO. Date of Intro. Ref.

Volkswagen vs. Porsche. A Power-Index Analysis.

Class Period THE US CONSTITUTION. 2. Compare Article I with Article II. Which article is longer and more detailed? WHY do you suppose it s longer?

AP US Government & Politics Summer Assignment 2017

Unit: The Legislative Branch

The actual midterm will probably not be multiple choice. You should also study your notes, the textbook, and the homework.

Two-Tier Voting: Solving the Inverse Power Problem and Measuring Inequality

AP Government and Politics THE US CONSTITUTION STUDY GUIDE Available at:

Chapter 9: Social Choice: The Impossible Dream

Math 13 Liberal Arts Math HW7 Chapter Give an example of a weighted voting system that has a dummy voter but no dictator that is not [6:5,3,1].

Standard Voting Power Indexes Do Not Work: An Empirical Analysis

Annick Laruelle and Federico Valenciano: Voting and collective decision-making

WARWICK ECONOMIC RESEARCH PAPERS

Constitution Quest PART I - THE OVERALL STRUCTURE OF THE CONSTITUTION

THE SOUTH AUSTRALIAN LEGISLATIVE COUNCIL: POSSIBLE CHANGES TO ITS ELECTORAL SYSTEM

This assignment must be completed in your own words. Copying or sharing answers is unacceptable and will face academic dishonesty consequences.

Voting and Apportionment(Due by Nov. 25)

THE PRO S AND CON S OF THE ELECTORAL COLLEGE SYSTEM

Fair Division in Theory and Practice

Rounding decimals or fractions to whole numbers might seem to be one of the most boring subjects ever.

A Simulative Approach for Evaluating Electoral Systems

Interdisciplinary Teaching Grant Proposal. Applicants:

1 von :46

IMF Governance and the Political Economy of a Consolidated European Seat

Voting power in the Electoral College: The noncompetitive states count, too

MATH 1340 Mathematics & Politics

Compare the vote Level 3

POLITICAL LITERACY. Unit 1

An Overview on Power Indices

Compare the vote Level 1

Standard Voting Power Indexes Don t Work: An Empirical Analysis 1

Fair Division in Theory and Practice

Measuring Presidential Power in Post-Communist Countries: Rectification of Mistakes 1

Buying Supermajorities

U.S. Constitution TEST. Notecards

EU Decision-making and the Allocation of Responsibility

The United States Constitution & The Illinois Constitution. Study Guide

YORKTOWN HIGH SCHOOL 5200 Yorktown Boulevard Arlington, Virginia June 7, Dear Future AP Government Student,

2009BargagliottieMAA6up.pdf 1

Why are there only two major parties in US? [party attachments below]

AP Gov - Plank Summer Assignment - The Constitution Name: Prd:

Decision Making in Europe: Were Spain and Poland Right to Stop the Constitution in December 2003? 1

Transcription:

Finite Math A Chapter 2, Weighted Voting Systems 1 Discrete Mathematics Notes Chapter 2: Weighted Voting Systems The Power Game Academic Standards: PS.ED.2: Use election theory techniques to analyze election data. Use weighted voting techniques to decide voting power within a group. ONE PERSON ONE VOTE is an democratic idea of equality But what if the voters are not PEOPLE but are governments? countries? states? If the institutions are not equal, then the number of votes they control should not be equal. The United Nations Security Council 15 voting nations: 5 permanent members (Britain, China, France, Russia, United States), 10 nonpermanent members appointed for a 2-year rotation. Permanent members have more votes than non permanent members. Stock Holders/Shareholders: The more stock you own, the more say you have in decision making for the company. The Electoral College Each state gets a number of electors (votes) equal to the number of Senators plus the number of Representatives in Congress. California has 55 votes but North Dakota only has 3 votes. Each state is a voter but states with heavy concentration of population receive a bigger vote. This situation where each voter is not equal in the number of votes they control is called: 2.1 An Introduction to weighted voting Important terms: : A voting situation where voters are not necessarily equal in the number of votes they control. : A vote with only two choices. (usually yes/no) : The voters (symbolized by P 1, P 2, P 3, etc.) : The number of votes a player controls. : The smallest number of votes required to pass a motion.

Finite Math A Chapter 2, Weighted Voting Systems 2 Notation Example 1. [14: 8, 6, 5, 1] [q: w 1, w 2, w 3,..., w n ] q = w s = quota = total votes = Player 1 (P 1) = controls votes / has a weight of Player 2 (P 2) = controls votes Player 3 (P 3) = controls votes Player 4 (P 4) = controls vote Example 2. Given the weighted voting system [16: 8, 6, 4, 4, 3, 1], state the following: The number of players: The weight of P 5: The total number of votes: The minimum % of the quota to nearest whole %: Common Types of Quotas: Simple majority/strict majority Two-thirds majority Unanimity U.S. Senate: Simple Majority to pass an ordinary law (51 votes) 60 votes to stop a filibuster 2/3 of the votes (67) to override a presidential veto. Weighted Voting Issues Example 3: Four partners decide to start a business. P 1 buys 8 shares, P 2 buys 7 shares, P 3 buys 3 shares and P 4 buys 2 shares. One share = one vote. a. The quota is set at two-thirds of the total number of votes. Describe as a weighted voting system. b. The partnership above decides the quota is too high and changes the quota to 10 votes. c. The partnership above decides to make the quota equal to 21 votes.

Finite Math A Chapter 2, Weighted Voting Systems 3 For a weighted voting system to be legal: the quota must be at least a and no more than V Symbolically: If V w1 w2 w3... wn, then q V 2 Example 3d. What if our partnership changed the quota to 19? 4. [q: 7, 2, 1, 1, 1] What is the smallest legal quota? What is the largest legal quota? What is the value of the quota if at least two-thirds of the votes are required to pass a motion? What is the value of the quota if more than three-fourths of the votes are required to pass? 5. A committee has 4 members (P 1, P 2, P 3, P 4). P 1 has twice as many votes as P 2. P 2 has twice as many votes as P 3. P 3 and P 4 have the same number of votes. The quota is 49. Describe the weighted voting system using the notation [q: w1, w2, w3, w4] given the definitions of quota below. (Hint: write the weighted voting system as [49: 4x, 2x, x, x] and then solve for x. a) The quota is a simple majority b) The quota is more than three-fourths

Finite Math A Chapter 2, Weighted Voting Systems 4 Dictators, Dummies, and Veto Power Example 6: [11: 12, 5, 4] What do you notice about P 1? P 1 has all the power P 2 and P 3 have no power Note: If any player is a dictator, then EVERY OTHER PLAYER is a dummy. Even if there is no dictator, there may still be dummies. Example 7: [30: 10, 10, 10, 9] Example 8: [12: 9, 5, 4, 2] Is there a dictator? If P 1 chooses to vote against the motion, can the other players combine weight to meet the quota? If a player is not a dictator, but the other players cannot meet the quota without his votes, we say he has veto power. Sometimes, more than one player will have veto power. Example 9. Determine which players, if any, are: dictators, veto power, dummies a) [15: 16, 8, 4, 1] b) [18: 16, 8, 4, 1] c) [24: 16, 8, 4, 1] Example 10. Consider [q: 8, 4, 2]. Find the smallest value of q for which a) all three players have veto power b) P 2 has veto power, but P 3 does not c) P 3 is the only dummy

Finite Math A Chapter 2, Weighted Voting Systems 5 2.2/2.3 The Banzhaf Power Index Who is the most POWERFUL player? : A group of players who choose to vote together : The set of all voters. This represents a unanimous vote. Weight of the coalition: Winning coalitions Losing coalitions : Any player who MUST BE PRESENT in a winning coalition in order for it to remain a winning coalition. Note: If you subtract the critical player s votes from the coalition, the number of votes drops below the quota. Example 1: Find the critical player or critical players in each of the following coalitions. [15: 13, 9, 5, 2] a) {P 1, P 4} b) {P 2, P 3, P 4} c) {P 3, P 4} d) {P 1, P 2, P 3} [51: 30, 25, 25, 20] a) {P 1, P 3} b) {P 1, P 2, P 3} c) {P 2, P 3, P 4} d) {P 2, P 3} The Banzhaf Power Index: A player s power is proportional to the number of coalitions for which that player is critical. The more often a player is critical, the more power he holds.

Finite Math A Chapter 2, Weighted Voting Systems 6 Calculate the Banzhaf Power Index: Idea: Step 1: Make a list of all WINNING coalitions. Step 2: Determine which players are critical in each coalition. (circle, underline, highlight) Step 3: Count the total number of times each player is critical Step 4: Add the total number of times each player is critical to find the grand total number of critical players. The Banzhaf Power INDEX number for each player = step 3 step 4 The Banzhaf Power DISTRIBUTION for the weighted voting system is the % of power each player holds. Example 2: Find the Banzhaf Power index for the weighted voting system: [101: 99, 98, 3] Example 3: Find the Banzhaf Power Distribution for [4: 3, 2, 1]

Finite Math A Chapter 2, Weighted Voting Systems 7 How do you know you have all the possible coalitions written down? If n = number of players in a weighted voting system, Be systematic or use the formula! Then the number of possible coalitions is: 2 n 1 How many coalitions if 4 players? How many coalitions if 5 players? Example 4: Find the Banzhaf Power Distribution for [6: 4, 3, 2, 1] Banzhaf Coalitions: 4 Players {P1} {P1,P2} {P1, P2, P3} {P2} {P1,P3} {P1, P2, P4} {P3} {P1,P4} {P1, P3, P4} {P4} {P2,P3} {P2, P3, P4} {P2,P4} {P1, P2, P3, P4} {P3,P4} Example 5: Consider the weighted voting system [q: 8, 4, 2, 1]. Find the Banzhaf Power Distribution of this weighted voting system when: a) q = 8 b) q = 10 c) q = 14

Finite Math A Chapter 2, Weighted Voting Systems 8 What I expect to see for work on your homework: 1. Write down all possible coalitions and cross off losers OR just the winning coalitions. 2. Critical Players should be circled or underlined. 3. Show fraction of BPI for each player AND calculate the % for BPD. Possible Coalitions: Use these to help you: Banzhaf Coalitions: 3 Players {P1} {P1,P2} {P1, P2, P3} {P2} {P1,P3} {P3} {P2,P3} Banzhaf Coalitions: 4 Players {P1} {P1,P2} {P1, P2, P3} {P2} {P1,P3} {P1, P2, P4} {P3} {P1,P4} {P1, P3, P4} {P4} {P2,P3} {P2, P3, P4} {P2,P4} {P1, P2, P3, P4} {P3,P4} Where weighted voting systems/banzhaf are used: Banzhaf is used to QUANTIFY the amount of power each player holds. 1. Nassau County Board of Supervisors (see p. 55): Votes were given to districts according to population and quota was simple majority. [58: 31, 31, 28, 21, 2, 2] Banzhaf showed that two of the six counties actually had no voting power that they were actually dummy voters. Final result: 1993 court decision abolishing weighted voting in New York States. Districts were created of roughly the same population and each given one voted. 2. United Nations Security Council: Banzhaf shows that a permanent member of the council holds more than 10 times the amount of power as one of the non-permanent members. There are 5 permanent members (Britain, China, France, Russia, US) and 10 non-permanent members. This voting arrangement may change as others are being considered for permanent membership. 3. European Union Banzhaf quantifies the amount of power each nation has and shows that smaller nations such as Luxembourg and Malta still hold some power.

Finite Math A Chapter 2, Weighted Voting Systems 9 2.4/2.5 The Shapley Shubik Power Index: The Shapley-Shubik Power Index: A player s power is proportional to the number of sequential-coalitions for which that player is pivotal. The more times a player is pivotal, the more power he holds. Sequential coalition: Banzhaf: { P1, P2, P3} Shapley-Shubik: P 1, P 3, P 2 These 3 players decide to vote together. These 3 players decide to vote together. They form a coalition. P1 votes 1 st, P3 votes 2 nd, P2 votes 3 rd. Order listed in the { } doesn t matter. They form a sequential coalition. Order listed in the is important. Pivotal player: Example: Find the Pivotal Player 1. Given the weighted voting system [5: 3,2,1,1} find the pivotal player for the given sequential coalition. a) [P 1,P 4,P 3,P 2] b) [P 3,P 1,P 2,P 4] c) [P 4,P 3,P 2,P 1]

Finite Math A Chapter 2, Weighted Voting Systems 10 Counting Sequential Coalitions: List the possible sequence for 3 players. How many are there? How many sequential coalitions are there for 4 players? For 5 players? Multiplication Rule: If there are m ways to do task 1 and n ways to do task 2, then there are mxn ways to do both tasks together. Shapley-Shubik Power Distribution Factorials: If N= the number of players, then the number of sequential coalitions is N! N! = N x (N-1) x... x 3 x 2 x 1 Step 1: Make a list of all sequential coalitions Step 2: For each sequential coalition, determine the pivotal player. Step 3: For each player, count the number of times they are pivotal and divide by the number of sequential coalitions. Calculate the %. Example 2: Find the Shapely Shubik Power Distribution for [4: 3, 2, 1] Sequential Coalitions: 3 Players [P1,P2,P3] [P1,P3,P2] [P2,P1,P3] [P2,P3,P1] [P3,P1,P2] [P3,P2,P1]

Finite Math A Chapter 2, Weighted Voting Systems 11 Example 3: Find the Shapley-Shubik Power Distribution for [6: 4, 3, 2, 1] Sequential Coalitions: 4 Players [P 1,P 2,P 3,P 4] [P 2,P 1,P 3,P 4] [P 3,P 1,P 2,P 4] [P 4,P 1,P 2,P 3] [P 1,P 2,P 4,P 3] [P 2,P 1,P 4,P 3] [P 3,P 1,P 4,P 2] [P 4,P 1,P 3,P 2] [P 1,P 3,P 2,P 4] [P 2,P 3,P 1,P 4] [P 3,P 2,P 1,P 4] [P 4,P 2,P 1,P 3] [P 1,P 3,P 4,P 2] [P 2,P 3,P 4,P 1] [P 3,P 2,P 4,P 1] [P 4,P 2,P 3,P 1] [P 1,P 4,P 2,P 3] [P 2,P 4,P 1,P 3] [P 3,P 4,P 1,P 2] [P 4,P 3,P 1,P 2] [P 1,P 4,P 3,P 2] [P 2,P 4,P 3,P 1] [P 3,P 4,P 2,P 1] [P 4,P 3,P 2,P 1] Example 4: Find the Shapley-Shubik Power Distribution for [10: 8, 4, 2, 1] Sequential Coalitions: 4 Players [P 1,P 2,P 3,P 4] [P 2,P 1,P 3,P 4] [P 3,P 1,P 2,P 4] [P 4,P 1,P 2,P 3] [P 1,P 2,P 4,P 3] [P 2,P 1,P 4,P 3] [P 3,P 1,P 4,P 2] [P 4,P 1,P 3,P 2] [P 1,P 3,P 2,P 4] [P 2,P 3,P 1,P 4] [P 3,P 2,P 1,P 4] [P 4,P 2,P 1,P 3] [P 1,P 3,P 4,P 2] [P 2,P 3,P 4,P 1] [P 3,P 2,P 4,P 1] [P 4,P 2,P 3,P 1] [P 1,P 4,P 2,P 3] [P 2,P 4,P 1,P 3] [P 3,P 4,P 1,P 2] [P 4,P 3,P 1,P 2] [P 1,P 4,P 3,P 2] [P 2,P 4,P 3,P 1] [P 3,P 4,P 2,P 1] [P 4,P 3,P 2,P 1]