MEDICAL ASSESSMENT REVIEW AND APPEAL PROCEDURE CLASS 1, 2, 3 AND LAPL MEDICAL CERTIFICATION

Similar documents
Code of Practice for the Investigations and Enforcement Team CAP 1422

2004 No 2608 HEALTH CARE AND ASSOCIATED PROFESSIONS DOCTORS. General Medical Council (Fitness to Practise) Rules Order of Council 2004

HEALTH CARE AND ASSOCIATED PROFESSIONS DOCTORS. General Medical Council (Fitness to Practise) Rules Order of Council 2004

National Park Authority Local Review Body Standing Orders

FLYING GROUPS. Appoint a Group Chairman, Treasurer and Secretary;

APPEALS AND GRIEVANCES Section 7. Overview

The Federation of the Royal Colleges of Physicians of the United Kingdom

VOLUNTARY REGISTER OF DRIVING INSTRUCTORS GOVERNING POLICY

ORDINANCE XVII DISMISSAL AND REMOVAL FROM OFFICE OF ACADEMIC STAFF: TRIBUNAL AND APPEALS PROCEDURES

DISPUTE RESOLUTION PROCESS

ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEWS AND GRIEVANCES Section 10. Overview. Definitions

The General Teaching Council for Scotland Fitness to Teach Rules 2017 These Rules are available in alternative formats on request

ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEWS AND GRIEVANCES Section 10. Overview. Definitions


ATTACHMENT D Member Grievances and Appeals And Provider Complaints and Appeals

Guidance on consumer enforcement CAP 1018

David Clayton-Smith has been appointed as independent lay person Chair. Dr Jonathan Inglesfield has been appointed as Vice Chair.

COTHAM SCHOOL COMPLAINTS POLICY AND PROCEDURES

Health Practitioners Competence Assurance Act 2003 Complaints and Discipline Process

Sanctions and Anti-Money Laundering Bill [HL]

THE UNIVERSITY OF NOTTINGHAM SENATE DISCIPLINARY COMMITTEE - RULES OF PROCEDURE

4. This guidance is a public document and is available from the GOC s website at:

March Getting the best out of the BBC for licence fee payers

Sanctions and Anti-Money Laundering Bill [HL]

EADV STATUTES EUROPEAN ACADEMY OF DERMATOLOGY AND VENEREOLOGY STATUTES 2017 (Approved amendments 25 th May 2017)

IMMIGRATION ADVISERS COMPLAINTS AND DISCIPLINARY TRIBUNAL

Appeal Process. Appeals Process Diagram

1. BG s Constitution, its Regulations and the various conditions of membership, registration and affiliation together require that:

What to do if a complaint is made about you

Safeguarding and Protecting Young People in Hockey Complaints and Disciplinary Regulations

CHESTER-LE-STREET GOLF CLUB MEMBERS DISCIPLINARY POLICY AND PROCEDURE

Sanctions and Anti-Money Laundering Bill [HL]

Civil and Administrative Tribunal Amendment Act 2013 No 94

DISCIPLINARY AND DISMISSAL PROCEDURE

MEDICAL STAFF BYLAWS. Part II: Investigations, Corrective Action, Hearing and Appeal Plan

THE CHARTERED INSURANCE INSTITUTE Disciplinary Procedure Rules

Rules of the British Air Line Pilots Association 2018

The procedures shall include, but not be limited to, grievances regarding:

Complaints in Relation to Child Protection Conferences For parents, carers, children and young people

New Zealand Institute of Chartered Accountants RULES OF THE NEW ZEALAND INSTITUTE OF CHARTERED ACCOUNTANTS EFFECTIVE 26 JUNE 2017 CONTENTS

ICA ASSESSMENT APPEALS PROCEDURE ICAB584

DISCIPLINARY PROCEDURES

Medical Staff Bylaws Part 2: INVESTIGATIONS, CORRECTIVE ACTION, HEARING AND APPEAL PLAN

Any one or more of the following actions or recommended actions constitute grounds for a hearing unless otherwise specified in these Bylaws:

GRIEVANCE AND APPEAL TECHNICAL REQUI REMENT PIHP GRIEVANCE SYSTEM FOR MEDICAID BENEFICIARIES. January, 2016 TABLE OF CONTENTS

THE INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS ACT (Chapter 321) THE INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS (TRIBUNAL PROCEDURE) RULES 2010

How to obtain permission... 17

Australian Medical Council Limited

This leaflet sets out the commitment of members to a code of ethics and conduct.

ENGLAND BOXING DISCIPLINARY PROCEDURE

DISCIPLINARY POLICY AND PROCEDURE

STUDENT DISCIPLINE PROCEDURE 2016

DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL AFFAIRS AND TOURISM

IMPERIAL COLLEGE LONDON ORDINANCE D8. THE DISCIPLINARY PROCEDURE This Ordinance is made pursuant to Part III of the Appendix to the College s Statutes

WORKERS COMPENSATION APPEALS TRIBUNAL PRACTICE MANUAL

Regulations for the consideration of criminal convictions for students on courses leading to professional registration

RPT-G6. Mobile Homes guidance

Good decision making: Investigating committee meetings and outcomes guidance

Aircraft Noise Ombudsman Charter. Approved 11 April 2012

Disciplinary Policy and Procedure

Code of Complaints & Disciplinary Procedures

LifeWays Grievance and Appeals Training

Williamson Flying Club

MEDICAL CENTER-WAUPACA

ARTICLES OF ASSOCIATION JUNE 2016 DRAFT THE COMPANIES ACT 1985 COMPANY LIMITED BY GUARANTEE AND NOT HAVING A SHARE CAPITAL ARTICLES OF ASSOCIATION

Re: General Medical Council v Adeogba; General Medical Council v Visvardis [2016] EWCA Civ 162

DISCIPLINARY PROCEDURE FOR TEACHERS NOTES OF GUIDANCE FOR RELEVANT BODIES

Table of Contents. Injury Manual Insurer s Decisions and Appeals. Division Summary Information

STUDENT GRIEVANCE POLICY

A Guide to the Ontario Hockey Federation Appeal Process. For Players, Volunteers, Administrators & Organizations

Page 1 of 11 ADMINISTRATIVE POLICY AND PROCEDURE

Governance and transparency

DISCIPLINARY PROCEDURE FOR TEACHERS NOTES OF GUIDANCE FOR RELEVANT BODIES

Texas Academy of Family Physicians. Section on Resident Physicians Officer Position Guide

COMMUNITY MENTAL HEALTH OF OTTAWA COUNTY RECIPIENT RIGHTS Page 1 of 11 SECTION: 4 SUBJECT: RECIPIENT RIGHTS EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR

ITCHEN ABBAS PRIMARY SCHOOL. Habitual or Vexatious Complainants Policy. IAPS HVCPolicy Page 1

Terms of Reference and Rules of Procedure Clinical Trials Subcommittee

The Intellectual Property Regulation Board (incorporating The Patent Regulation Board and the Trade Mark Regulation Board)

Reference No: Issue 6. Issue Date: 19/06/17. Focal: ASD

INITIAL ASSESSMENT FILING A COMPLAINT

3. DETAILS OF PREVIOUS STATES OF LICENCE ISSUE (SOLI) IF YOU CHANGED SINCE THE YEAR 2011.

Summary of Amendments to NHS Chorley and South Ribble CCG Constitution

MAYORS COUNCIL ON REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION RULES OF PROCEDURE FOR THE CONDUCT OF MEETINGS. In these Rules of Procedure for the Conduct of Meetings:

CHAPTER 7 TRADE IN SERVICES. Article 1: Definitions

Terms of Reference and Rules of Procedure Health Products Regulatory Authority

NIGERIA ELECTRICITY REGULATION COMMISSION CUSTOMER COMPLAINTS HANDLING: STANDARDS AND PROCEDURES

CHALLENGING ENVIRONMENTAL DECISIONS:

The Labour Relations Agency Arbitration Scheme. Guide to the Scheme

PHO Services Agreement Amendment Protocol

The complaint process enquiry, mediation, investigation, adjudication, appeal

Guidance for the Practice Committees including Indicative Sanctions Guidance

THE CHARTERED INSTITUTE OF MANAGEMENT ACCOUNTANTS

Cuyahoga County Common Pleas Court Local Rules 33.0 ASSIGNMENT AND COMPENSATION OF COUNSEL TO DEFEND

PROCEDURES FOR INVESTIGATIONS BY THE COMPLIANCE OFFICER FOR IPSA. Determined by IPSA under section 9A of the Parliamentary Standards Act 2009

Road Transport (General) Regulation 2005

A guide to GMC investigations and fitness to practise proceedings

PART 3A PROCEEDINGS AND APPEALS

Due Process Grievance and Appeal

Corrective Action/Fair Hearing Plan. For. The Medical Staff of Indiana University Blackford Hospital Hartford City, IN 47348

REVOKED AS OF APRIL 11, 2016

Transcription:

MEDICAL ASSESSMENT REVIEW AND APPEAL PROCEDURE CLASS 1, 2, 3 AND LAPL MEDICAL CERTIFICATION 1. PRIMARY ASSESSMENT OF FITNESS Class 1, 2 and 3 An application for a Class 1, 2 or 3 medical certificate (required to act as a pilot or an air traffic controller) will be made to an Aeromedical Examiner (AME) approved by the Civil Aviation Authority (CAA) or, in the case of an initial Class 1 or 3 medical certificate, to an Aeromedical Centre (AeMC). The AME (or AeMC in the case of an initial Class 1 or 3 applicant), following consideration of any additional reports or information, may issue the certificate, or assess the applicant as unfit. This is an AME/AeMC primary assessment of fitness. LAPL An application for a Light Aircraft Pilot s Licence (LAPL) medical certificate will be made to the applicant s National Health Service or military General Practitioner (GP) or an Aeromedical Examiner (AME) approved by the Civil Aviation Authority (CAA). An applicant whose certificate has been denied by a GP may request that the application be referred to an AME. Borderline cases, including those that need operational limitations, must be assessed by an AME or AeMC. This is a GP/AME/AeMC primary assessment of fitness. AMS Primary Assessment of Fitness In some cases a primary assessment of fitness may be undertaken by a Medical Assessor of the Authority Medical Section (AMS) of the CAA. This may occur either - in borderline or complex cases the AME or AeMC decides to refer the decision to CAA AMS (Class 1 or 3 medicals) 1 ; or it is a case or medical condition that is required under the rules to be passed to CAA AMS for a primary assessment decision. Any case which is subject to primary assessment by an AMS Medical Assessor will be considered against the relevant medical requirements. If further specialist opinion or investigations are required, the applicant will be advised what is required and how these can be obtained. The AMS Medical Assessor may need to direct the applicant to a specific physician depending on the nature of the medical condition. Mitigating factors such as operational and other limitations may be taken into account as part of the assessment process. The AMS Medical Assessor will consider the medical and other relevant reports and advise the applicant whether the medical requirements have been met and whether a medical certificate, with limitations as appropriate, can be issued. 2. AMS SECONDARY REVIEW OF FITNESS A secondary review of fitness will be undertaken by the AMS on request by the applicant following denial of an application or the imposition of a variation or limitation at the primary assessment. Where the primary assessment of fitness was made by an AMS Medical Assessor the secondary review will be undertaken by a different AMS Medical Assessor. 1 In complex or borderline Class 2 medical cases the AME or AeMC takes the primary assessment decision in consultation with the CAA AMS 1 of 5 Issued By: UK Civil Aviation Authority,

The AMS secondary review will also include a review of the case by one or more independent specialist advisers who have not previously been involved in the clinical or certificatory assessment of the case. Input from operational or other experts may be required. Where the AMS Medical assessor conducting the secondary review concludes there is a need for the provision of further test results or reports, these will be obtained and reviewed at this secondary review stage before a secondary review decision is made. The secondary review decision and the reasons for it will be sent to the applicant by the AMS Medical Assessor in writing. If a considerable time passes or the medical situation has changed significantly, and, in the view of the AMS Medical Assessor conducting the secondary review, the circumstances of the case have changed substantially, that AMS Medical Assessor may determine that the provision of subsequent additional medical information is necessary and that once received, that information will be sent back to the person who conducted the primary assessment so that the case can be reassessed as a primary assessment stage decision. 3. APPEAL FROM DECISION OF SECONDARY REVIEW THE FINAL APPEAL Requesting a final appeal If, following a secondary review, a certificate has been denied, varied or limited, the applicant will be informed in writing, advised the reasons for the decision and advised of their right to request a final appeal to the CAA s Chief Medical Officer. Such an appeal may be on the basis that the applicant disagrees with the medical opinion reached and/or that he/she agrees with the medical decision but disagrees with the consequential decision on the appropriate action e.g. a limitation of licence privileges. The Request for Final Appeal form is available on the CAA s website and should be completed and sent to the Chief Medical Officer. Such Request for Final Appeal should normally be submitted within 14 days of receiving the secondary review decision from the AMS Medical Assessor. The CAA may allow an extension to this time limit if there is good reason for doing so. The maximum extension permitted is six months, otherwise the case will first undergo a further primary assessment by the AMS following the receipt of up to date specialist medical reports. Brief grounds of the appeal should be set out on the form. The names of any specialists who have been involved in the clinical care or assessment of the applicant should be stated on the Notice of Appeal form to avoid potential conflicts of interest. A consent form (available on the CAA s Website) must be completed by the applicant for the release of personal medical information held by the CAA to the AMS representative(s) and the specialist advisers who will provide expert advice at the Final Appeal (together with the CMO, the Panel). The Panel will usually meet in person at a hearing. Therefore, the applicant should also confirm on the Notice of Appeal whether they wish to attend the Final Appeal in person at that hearing. In some cases the Panel will advise the CMO in writing only and there will not be an oral hearing. Examples of reasons for this include - CAA has exceptionally agreed to take a very quick decision in order that (should a certificate be granted) the pilot is able to return to flying in time before their licence would expire, which would require them to undergo additional tests; or The underlying medical condition is rare and it is not possible to get the relevant experts all together in a reasonable timeframe. 2 of 5 Issued By: UK Civil Aviation Authority,

The Request for Final Appeal Form should be signed and dated by the applicant and sent with the associated consent form to the Chief Medical Officer (Appeal),, Civil Aviation Authority, Aviation House, Gatwick Airport South RH6 0YR. The Chief Medical Officer may disallow an appeal if, in the opinion of the Chief Medical Officer, the request is frivolous or vexatious. Preparation for the Final Appeal Where an appeal proceeds, the Chief Medical Officer will appoint two or more specialist advisers including at least one in the relevant medical specialty and, where appropriate, a flight operations specialist as a Medical Appeal Panel to provide expert advice to assist the CMO in making the CAA s decision. The Final Appeal decision will be made by the CMO after either - The Chief Medical Officer has chaired a meeting of the Panel who provide their advice in person (and the applicant may also have chosen to attend that hearing in person); or The Chief Medical Officer has obtained advice from the Panel members by correspondence (as set out above). Where an oral hearing will take place the applicant will be informed of the date of that hearing. The AMS Medical Assessor who conducted the secondary review will prepare an AMS Final Appeal Brief. This will include the relevant medical records on the basis of which the secondary review was conducted, such as the medical history, specialist examination, specialist reports and other assessments such as medical flight tests. The AMS Final Appeal Brief will also contain a summary of the reasons for the AMS secondary review decision and the reasons the applicant has requested the appeal set out in, and attached to, the Request for Final Appeal Form. A copy of the AMS Final Appeal Brief will be sent to the applicant at least 30 days before the date the CMO will make the Final Appeal decision (whether or not the applicant has requested an oral hearing). The applicant may submit written representations to the Chief Medical Officer, including their detailed grounds for appeal, up to 14 days before the date that the Final Appeal decision will be made. These should include any additional details that the applicant wishes to raise in support of their appeal. Note, if new arguments are raised at the hearing, it may be necessary to adjourn the appeal to a later date. If new medical evidence is presented, the Chief Medical Officer may refer the case back to the AMS who conducted the secondary review to reconsider whether the certificate should be denied, varied or limited. The AMS Final Appeal Brief and any subsequent written representations from the applicant will comprise the papers for consideration at the hearing. Those papers will be sent to the applicant, the AMS Medical Assessor that conducted the secondary review, the Chief Medical Officer and members of the Panel normally at least 7 days before the hearing. 4. THE FINAL MEDICAL APPEAL HEARING Normally the CMO will convene a Panel and make a decision on the Final Appeal within 3 months of the Uequest Ior an Dppeal being received. The Final Medical Appeal Panel will be conducted by the Chief Medical Officer, who will sit as Chair of the Panel. The Final Medical Appeal Panel will usually meet at Aviation House, Gatwick The CMO will decide, at their discretion, the constitution of the Panel. However, the Panel will normally comprise Chief Medical Officer of the CAA: Chair; 3 of 5 Issued By: UK Civil Aviation Authority,

One or more Consultants in the clinical specialty relevant to the applicant s primary medical condition appointed by the Chief Medical Officer. Where the appeal relates to more than one medical condition, one or more specialists for each further condition will be appointed. One or more consultant advisors experienced in aviation medicine or consultants in Aviation Medicine. Operational Expert(s) of the CAA: Where the appeal relates to matters of a specifically operational nature, a CAA flight operations specialist (normally a senior Captain) will also be appointed to the Panel. The hearing will also be attended by the AMS Representative who conducted the secondary review or where this is not possible by another CAA AMS representative. If the applicant is attending an oral hearing they are entitled to attend with anyone they wish and be represented (including legally and medically and/or by their relevant professional union representative). Names of all attendees should be notified to the CMO at least 7 days in advance of the hearing. If the applicant is to have legal representation this should be notified to the CMO at least 30 days prior to the date of the Panel. In such cases the CAA AMS representative may attend with a legal representative. The CMO may appoint a CAA legal advisor to the Panel to advise on matters of procedure only. Should the applicant or the AMS wish to introduce new evidence or matters not contained in the hearing papers, the Chief Medical Officer will determine whether any Panel discussion and the Final Appeal decision needs to be delayed to enable sufficient time to consider the new material or to refer the case back to the AMS. In the event that the Chief Medical Officer is unavailable, or conflicted, another AMS Medical Assessor, who will have had no involvement in the case, will act in his/her place. The applicant will be invited to address the Panel and may ask that the CMO direct questions to the AMS representative who may, at their discretion, do so. The AMS representative will be invited to address the Panel and may ask that the CMO direct questions to the applicant who may, at their discretion do so. The Panel may question the applicant and the AMS representative. At the conclusion of the oral hearing, the Chief Medical Officer and the Panel only will withdraw to discuss the case. An aural record of the hearing will be made and a copy provided to the applicant free of charge on request. The discussions of the Panel and the Chief Medical Officer following the hearing will not be recorded. 5. THE DECISION OF THE CHIEF MEDICAL OFFICER The Chief Medical Officer will make the final decision on fitness for certification on behalf of the CAA. The applicant will be notified of the outcome of the appeal in writing normally within 10 working days. The reasons for the decision and the views of the experts on which the decision maker has relied on reaching the decision will be set out in that decision. 6. COSTS AND CHARGES The Panel s fees and expenses will normally be paid by the CAA. Any expenses incurred by the applicant, including the fees and expenses for medical reports are the responsibility of the applicant. 4 of 5 Issued By: UK Civil Aviation Authority,

7. PROCESS FOR A REGULATION 6 APPEAL AGAINST THE CONDUCT OF AN EXAMINATION An applicant may appeal to a Panel of CAA Board Members under Regulation 6 of the Civil Aviation Authority Regulations. Such an appeal is limited to determining whether any medical test or examination has been properly conducted. It is not an appeal against the medical decision of the Chief Medical Officer. If the Regulation 6 Panel concludes that a test or examination had not been properly conducted the only remedy it may provide for an applicant is to order that the test or examination be repeated. 8. COMMENTS ON PROCESS Where an applicant considers that the CAA has not followed its own procedures, the applicant should write to the CAA s General Counsel 2. Dr Sally Evans Chief Medical Officer UK CAA 6 January 2015 2 ogcmailbox@caa.co.uk 5 of 5 Issued By: UK Civil Aviation Authority,