IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF KING

Similar documents
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF WALLA WALLA. Plaintiff, Defendant. I. INTRODUCTION

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF SPOKANE STATE OF WASHINGTON, NO Plaintiff, I.

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF KING. DISCONTINUANCE WEIDNER PROPERTY MANAGEMENT LLC, Defendant.

No *5o4- SEP RE TURN COP'S IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF SPOKANE STATE OF WASHINGTON,

FILED 16 NOV 03 PM 2:13

FILED 16 AUG 29 PM 2:30

FILED 16 AUG 09 PM 2:59

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA

7 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF PIERCE 8 STATE OF WASHINGTON, 9 Plaintiff,

NO Attorney for Judgment Creditor: Audrey Udashen 23 Assistant Attorney General

STATE OF WASHINGTON KING COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT

EEOC v. U-Haul International Inc.

STATE OF WASHINGTON KING COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT DISCONTINUANCE V.

Case 2:06-cv RSM Document 30 Filed 05/04/2006 Page 1 of 6

8 IN RE: FRANCHISE NO 9 POACHING PROVISIONS ANYTIME FITNESS, LLC 10 ASSURANCE OF DISCONTINUANCE 11

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Plaintiff, v. Studley Products, Inc. and Wildwood Industries, Inc., Defendants.

SUPERIOR COURT OF WASHINGTON KING COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT NO.

EEOC v. Mason County Forest Products, LLC

8 IN RE: FRANCHISE NO POACHING NO. 9 PROVISIONS IHOP FRANCHISOR LLC 10 ASSURANCE OF DISCONTINUANCE 11 I. PARTIES

EEOC v. CMC Service of Chicago, LLC d/b/a Great Clips for Hair

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Dutch Farms, Inc.

STATE OF WASHINGTON KING COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT NO.

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE THIRTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, FOR HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY, FLORIDA CIVIL DIVISION

NO. VALVOLINE INSTANT OIL 10 CHANGE FRANCHISING, INC. ASSURANCE OF 11 DISCONTINUANCE

Cornell University ILR School. Judge Karen E. Schreier

L PARTIES. Pizza LLC ("Domino's") and other quick service restaurant franchisors relating to certain

STATE OF WASHINGTON, KING COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT. Defendants.

EEOC v. NEA-Alaska, Inc.

EEOC v. Pacific Airport Services, Inc.,

8 IN RE: FRANCHISE NO POACHING NO. 9 PROVISIONS BURGER KING CORPORATION 10 ASSURANCE OF DISCONTINUANCE 11 I. PARTIES

8 No. IN RE: FRANCHISE NO POACHING 9 PROVISIONS WINGSTOP RESTAURANTS INC. ASSURANCE OF DISCONTINUANCE 10

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Bob Watson Chevrolet

STATE OF WASHINGTON KING COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT. NO. 'zo't~% 4. The State of Washington (State), by and through its attorneys, Robert W.

Case 1:11-cv NLH -AMD Document 61 Filed 01/24/13 Page 1 of 12 PageID #: 211 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

EEOC, Christopher, Bhend, and Chamara v. National Education Association, National Education Association - Alaska

GOODS & SERVICES AGREEMENT FOR ORDINARY MAINTENANCE. between the City of and

Case 2:14-cv JLR Document 24 Filed 08/31/15 Page 1 of 44 THE HONORABLE JAMES L. ROBART 2

EEOC v. River View Coal, LLC

SENATE FILE NO. SF0132. Sponsored by: Senator(s) Scott and Representative(s) Stubson and Walters A BILL. for

CRIMINAL RECORDS SCREENING AND FAIR HOUSING. A Toolkit for Consumers

STATE OF WASHINGTON KING COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT NO. General (the Attorney General ), and Eric S. Newman, Assistant Attorney General, files this

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

United States of America v. The City of Belen, New Mexico

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Plaintiff, v. Mint Julep Restaurant Operations, LLC d/b/a Cheddar's Casual Cafe, Defendant.

Case 2:06-cv RSM Document 26 Filed 04/17/2006 Page 1 of 10

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA Equal Employment Opportunity ) Commission, ) Case No.: CV PHX-DAE

NO. 14 The Plaintiff, State of Washington, by and through its attorneys Robert W. Ferguson,

EEOC v. John Wieland Homes and Neighborhoods, Inc.

Case 2:12-cv Document 1 Filed 12/06/12 Page 1 of 14

U.S. EEOC v Promens USA, Inc. and Bonar Plastics, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA

STATE OF WASHINGTON KING COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT NO. General (the Attorney General ), and Eric S. Newman, Assistant Attorney General, files this

STATE OF WASHINGTON KING COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT

8 IN RE: FRANCHISE NO POACHING Wei PROVISIONS 9 LITTLE CAESAR ENTERPRISES, 10 INC. ASSURANCE OF DISCONTINUANCE 11 I. PARTIES

STATE OF WASHINGTON KING COUNT' SUPERIOR COURT r? NO. 5 5Z - 4 5LA. 1. t3 t 2- r b I i tala' 5. L_ L-C- QUIZ HOLDINGS, LLC ASSURANCE OF DISCONTINUANCE

Seattle City Attorney Peter S. Holmes

INDEPENDENT SALES ASSOCIATE AGREEMENT

I. PARTIES. dba Denny's, relating to certain provisions utilized in its franchise agreements.

EEOC & Wolansky v. United Healthcare of Florida, Inc.

PROVISIONS JAMBA JUICE COMPANY'S ASSURANCE OF 14 DISCONTINUANCE. Assurance of Discontinuance ("AOD") pursuant RCW

CHAPTER 19 FAIR HOUSING

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION

EVERGREEN LEGAL SERVICES OCT INSTITUTIONS PROJECT IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON FOR KING COUNTY STIPULATION

United States of America v. City of Lubbock, Texas

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. American Seafoods Company

EEOC v. Mcdonald's Restaurants of California, Inc.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

United States Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Plaintiff, v. Jetson Midwest Mailers, Inc., Defendant.

Case 5:07-cv VAP-JCR Document 11 Filed 06/14/2008 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA EASTERN DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NORTH DAKOTA ) ) ) ) INTRODUCTION

Case: 5:10-cv Doc #: 1 Filed: 10/12/10 1 of 8. PageID #: 1

BUDGET BLINDS, LLC'S ASSURANCE 9 POACHING PROVISIONS OF DISCONTINUANCE

Case: 1:14-cv Document #: 266 Filed: 10/05/17 Page 1 of 12 PageID #:5588

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN. Civil Action No.: [PROPOSED] CONSENT DECREE. Press Release.

EEOC v. Pass and Seymour, Inc. and Kennmark Group, Ltd. (Consent Decree as to Pass and Seymour)

EEOC & Rodriguez, et al. v. Dynamic Medical Services, Inc.

BYLAWS OF THE COLORADO NONPROFIT ASSOCIATION

X. FEDERAL TRANSIT ADMINISTRATION REQUIREMENTS

Form 61 Fair Housing Ordinance

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

IllY _ UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY ) CIVIL NO. COO-16S1 Z 10 COJ\.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Plaintiff, United States v. Donald Sterling, et al. (C.D. Cal.)

US v Matagorda County Decree UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS GALVESTON DIVISION

NO. 9 PIZZA HUT, LLC ASSURANCE OF DISCONTINUANCE 10. Assurance of Discontinuance ("AOD") pursuant RCW

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FOR THE STATE OF WASHINGTON IN AND FOR KING COUNTY

Case 4:10-cv YGR Document Filed 06/17/16 Page 1 of 11

WHEN DISCRETION MEANS DENIAL: Criminal Records Barriers to Federally Subsidized Housing. October 26, 2016 Housing Action Illinois Conference

EEOC v. Moka Shoe Corporation

Case: 1:12-cv Document #: 576 Filed: 07/06/17 Page 1 of 15 PageID #:22601

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. Case No. 2:17-cv-4720

BACKGROUND. this Agreement. 1 Due to privacy concerns, pseudonyms are used in place of Mother Smith s and Abraham Smith s legal names in

on,~3p TIN STATE OF WASHINGTON KING COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT NO, The State of Washington, by and through its attorneys, Robert W. Ferguson, Attorney

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SECOND JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR LEON COUNTY, FLORIDA SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT

SOUTHERN GLAZER S WINE AND SPIRITS, LLC. EMPLOYMENT ARBITRATION POLICY

LLC OPERATING AGREEMENT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION

Case 1:15-cv RDB Document 3-1 Filed 01/22/15 Page 1 of 11 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE DIVISION

STATE OF WASHINGTON DING COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT IN RE: FRANCHISE NO POACHING I NO. PROVISIONS A&W RESTAURANTS, INC. ASSURANCE OF DISCONTINUANCE

ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON MANUFACTURED HOUSING DISPUTE RESOLUTION PROGRAM

Transcription:

1 2 3 4 ITS IONG 00t:NTY, Y NWON SH NOV 6 4 ftl"10m COM FMK X_ 7 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 23 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF KING STATE OF WASHINGTON, NO. -2-931-1 V. Plaintiff, COHO REAL ESTATE GROUP, LLC, Defendant. I. INTRODUCTION CONSENT DECREE 1.1. The State of Washington, by and through its attorneys, Robert W. Ferguson, Attorney General, and Marsha J. Chien, Assistant Attorney General, filed this action against Defendant Coho Real Estate Group, LLC ("Coho") to enforce Title VIII of the Civil Rights Act of 68, as amended by the Fair Housing Amendments Act of 88, 42 U.S.C. 3601-36 ("FHA"); the Washington Law Against Discrimination, RCW 49.60.2 ("WLAD"); and the Washington Consumer Protection Act, RCW.86.0 ("CPA"). 1.2. Defendant Coho is a for-profit business in Washington State that is engaged in the rental of residential dwellings as. defined by both 42 U.S.C. 3602(b) and RCW 49.60.040(9). Defendant's principal place of business is located at 43 12th Ave NE, Seattle WA 98105. Defendant operates multi-family residential rental properties, including Hong Kong Apartments located at 507 Maynard Ave South, Seattle 98104. CONSENT DECREE 1 ATTORNEY GENERAL of WASHINGTON (6)443492

1 1.3. Defendant denies any wrongdoing or discriminatory conduct; however, the parties 2 have voluntarily agreed, as indicated by the signatures below, to resolve the claims against Defendant without the necessity of a trial on the merits. All communications related to this 4 -Consent Decree may be directed to:, Office of the Attorney General, 800 Fifth 5 Avenue, Suite 00, Seattle, WA, 98104. 6 1.4. The parties agree that this Consent Decree does not constitute admission, or 7 evidence regarding the existence or non-existence of any fact, issue, or alleged violation of law 8 claimed by the State of Washington; nor shall this Consent Decree be considered a waiver or 9 estoppel for any litigation unrelated to this Consent Decree. 10 U. INVESTIGATION 11 2.1. In May, the State of Washington conducted testing to evaluate Defendant's 12 compliance with the FHA, the WLAD, and the CPA. Testing is a simulation of a housing 13 transaction that evaluates housing providers' responses to determine whether illegal discrimination is occurring. 2.2. Discrimination may occur when housing providers place criminal history restrictions on housing. In Washington, racial disparities may exist in the criminal justice system. African Americans are arrested, convicted, and incarcerated at higher rates than non-african Americans. As a result, criminal history-restrictions on housing might have a disparate impact on African American renters. Absent a showing that a restriction is justified by a legitimate nondiscriminatory interest and is tailored (i.e., considers when the underlying conduct occurred, what the underlying conduct entailed, or what the convicted person has done since), a housing provider's blanket policy prohibiting tenants based on criminal history may discriminate based on 23 race or color and may violate the FHA, WLAD, and the CPA. CONSENT DECREE 2 ATTORNEY GENERAL OF WASHINGTON (6) 442-4492

1 2.3. As forth below, the State of Washington's testing revealed that Defendant has a 2 blanket policy at the Hong Kong Apartments of rejecting rental applicants with a felony conviction that may violate the FHA, WLAD, and the CPA. 4 2.1.1. Or. May,, a tester responded to Defendant's advertisement about 5 a rental property on Craigslist via e-mail. Defendant's Craigslist advertisement 6 indicated that rental applicants with felony convictions would be denied. 7 2.1.2. After confirming the rental was still available, the tester disclosed that 8 he had a felony conviction and asked if he could still apply for the rental. 9 2.1.3. Defendant's representative responded to the tester's e-mail, stating that 10 Hong Kong Apartments prohibits any renter whose criminal background results in a 11 felony. In denying the tester, Defendant's representative did not consider when the 12 conviction occurred, what the underlying conduct entailed, or what the tester had done 13 since the conviction.. Wherefore, it is ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED: I11. Injunction 3.1. Defendant, its agents, employees, successors, and all other persons in active concert or participation with it, is enjoined with respect to the rental of dwellings from: 3.1.1. Denying, or refusing to negotiate for the rental of, or otherwise making unavailable a dwelling, because of race or color; 3.1.2. Denying a dwelling to rental applicants with a criminal history without consideration of when the criminal conviction occurred, what the underlying conduct entailed, and/or what the convicted person has done since the conviction; or 23 3.1.3. Making statements in connection with the rental of a dwelling that express a prohibition_ against any person with a criminal history and that discourage applicants with criminal histories. CONSENT DECREE 3 ATTORNEY GENERAL OF WASHINGTON (6) 44492

1 2' 3 3.2 The provisions of Paragraph 3.1 shall apply to Hong Kong Apartments and all dwellings in which Defendant acquires a direct or indirect ownership, management, or other financial interest. 4 TV. Non-Discrimination Policy and Notice to Public 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12-13 23 4.1. Upon entry of this Consent Decree, Defendant shall implement the Nondiscrimination Policy appearing at Appendix A at Hong Kong Apartments. 4.2 Within fourteen () days of entry of this Consent Decree, and throughout its term, Defendant shall distribute the Nondiscrimination Policy to all its current tenants. Defendant may distribute the Nondiscrimination Policy by posting a copy on all tenants' doors. 4.3 Within fourteen () days of entry of this Consent Decree, and throughout its term, Defendant shall take the following steps to notify the public of the Nondiscrimination Policy: 4.3.1. Prominently post at any rental office that is used for the rental of dwellings, a fair housing sign no smaller than ten (10) inches by fourteen () inches, indicating that all apartments are available for rent on a nondiscriminatory basis and that any criminal history will be evaluated in consideration of when the crime occurred, what the underlying conduct entailed, and/or what the convicted person has done since the conviction; 4.3.2. Include the following phrase in the rental application(s) and the rental agreement(s) used for rental dwelling units in boldface type, using letters of equal or greater size to those of the text in the body of the document: We do not automatically exclude rental applicants based on criminal history.. Any criminal history will be evaluated in consideration of when the crime occurred, what the underlying conduct entailed, and/or what the rental applicant has done since the conviction. V. TRAINING CONSENT DECREE 4 ATTORNEY GENERAL OF WASHINGTON Seattle, WA *98104-38

1 5.1 Within fourteen () days of the entry of this Consent Decree, Defendant shall 2 provide a copy of this Consent Decree and the Nondiscrimination Policy to its principals, officers, 3 directors, agents, managers, employees involved in showing, renting, or managing its residential 4 units. Defendant shall secure a signed statement from each agent or employee acknowledging 5 that he or she has received and read the Consent Decree and the Nondiscrimination Policy, and 6 agrees to abide by the relevant provisions of the Consent Decree and the Nondiscrimination 7 Policy. This statement shall be in the form of Appendix B and be submitted to the Office of the 8 Attorney General. 9 5.2. During the term of this Consent Decree, within fifteen () days after each new 10 agent or employee becomes involved in showing, renting, or managing its residential units, 11 Defendant shall provide a copy of this Consent Decree and the Nondiscrimination Policy to each 12 such agent or employee and secure a signed statement from each agent or employee 13 acknowledging that he or she has received and mead the Consent Decree, and agrees to abide by the relevant provisions of the Consent Decree and the Nondiscrimination Policy. This statement -shall be in the form of Appendix B. 5.3. Within ninety (90) days from the date of entry of this Consent Decree, Defendant and all its principals, officers, directors, agents, managers, and employees involved in showing, renting, or managing its residential units, who did not participate in fair housing training on September,, or September 27,, shall undergo in-person fair housing training with.specific emphasis on the discriminatory impact of criminal history exclusions. The training shall be conducted by an independent, qualified third party, approved in advance by the Office of the Attorney General. The Defendant shall obtain confirmation of attendance for each individual who 23 receives training including the date, name of the course, length of the course, name of the instructor, and name of the individual who completed the course. Copies of these certificates, in CONSENT DECREE 5 ATTORNEY GENERAL OF WASHINGTON

1 the form of Appendix C, shall be submitted to the Office of the Attorney General. The 2 Defendant shall bear any expenses associated with this training. 3 VI. COMPLIANCE TESTING 4 6.1. The Attorney General may take steps to monitor Defendant's compliance with 5 this Consent Decree including, but not limited to, conducting fair_ housing tests at any office(s) 6 or location(s) at which Defendant conducts rental activities. 7 VII. REPORTING AND DOCUMENTATION RETENTION REQUIREMENTS 8 7.1. Defendant shall, no later than fourteen () days after occurrence, provide to the 9 Attorney General notification and documentation of the following events: 10 7.1.1. Any change to the rules or practices regarding the Nondiscrimination 11 I Policy (Appendix A). 12 7.1.2. Proof of notification of the Consent Decree and Nondiscrimination 13 Policy, including executed copies of Appendix B, and a rent rioll or list of the names and addresses for all tenants to whom the Nondiscrimination Policy was provided; 7.1.3. Proof of completion of the required fair housing training in the form of Appendix Q and 7.2. Upon the Attorney General's request, Defendant shall provide within fourteen () days of the request notice of any written complaint against Defendant, or Defendant's agents or employees, regarding discrimination in housing. The notification sliail include the full details of the complaint, including the complainant's name, address, and telephone number. Further, Defendant shall provide a copy of the written complaint with the notification and all information concerning any such complaint and the substance of any 23 resolution of such complaint. 7.2. Within ninety (90) days of entry of this Consent Decree, and every six (6) months thereafter for.the duration-of this Consent Decree, Defendant shall deliver to the CONSENT DECREE 6 ATTORNEY GENERAL OF WASHINGTON

1 Attorney General a report containing information regarding their compliance efforts during the 2 preceding reporting period, including but not limited to executed copies of Appendices B and 3 C, to the extent not previously provided. 4 7.3. Upon reasonable notice to counsel for the Defendant, representatives of the 5 Office of the Attorney General shall be permitted to access, inspect, and/or copy all business 6 records or documents under control of Defendant and depose any principal, officer, director, 7 agent, manager, employee, or representative of Defendant in order to monitor compliance with 8 this Consent Decree. 9 7.4. Should the Attorney General determine during its review that Defendant's 10 screening standards for criminal backgrounds remain discriminatory, the Attorney General 11 shall notify the Defendant and provide seven (7) days to modify its screening standard. If after 12 seven (7) days the Attorney General determines Defendant still to be non-compliant, the 13 Attorney General may-seek civil penalties in court as outlined-in paragraphs 9.1 through 9.3. VIII. PAYMENT 8.1. Pursuant to RCW.86.0, RCW.86.080, and RCW 49.60.030(2'), Defendant shall pay $5,000 to the Attorney General, of which no more than $4,000 shall be designated as a civil penalty. 8.2. The Attorney General shall use the funds not designated as a civil penalty for recovery of its fees and costs in investigating this matter, future monitoring and enforcement of this Consent Decree, future enforcement of RCW.86 and RCW 49.60, consumer restitution, damages, cy pres to remediate the impacts of-housing discrimination, or for any lawful purpose in the discharge of the Attorney General's duties at the sole discretion of the Attorney General. 23 8.3. Failure to pay these funds within fourteen () days of entry of the Consent Decree shall be a material breach of this Consent Decree. The payment shall be made by a valid check, made payable to the "Attorney General State of Washington", and shall be delivered to CONSENT DECREE 7 ATTORNEY GENERAL OF WASHINGTON Civil Rights unit Seattle, WA 98104-3I88 (6) 4422

1 the Office of the Attorney General, Attention: Marsha Chien,, 8-00 5th Avenue, 2 Suite 00, Seattle, Washington 98104-38. 3 IX. ENTRY AND DURATION 4 9.1. This Consent Decree shall be in effect for a period of three (3) years from the 5 date of its entry. The Court shall retain jurisdiction for the duration of this Consent Decree to 6 enforce its terms, after which time the case shall be dismissed with prejudice. 7 9.2. The Attorney General may move the Court to extend the duration of the 8 Consent Decree in the event of noncompliance whether intentional or not, with any of its 9 terms, or if it believes the interests of justice. so require. 10 9.3. Violation of any of the terms of this Consent Decree shall constitute a violation 11 of an injunction for which civil penalties of up to $,000 per violation may be sought by the 12 AGO pursuant to RCW.86.0, in addition to such other remedies as may be provided by 13 law, including the imposition by the Court of injunctions, restitution, civil penalties, and costs, including reasonable-attorneys' fees. X. ADDITIONAL PROVISIONS 10.1. Under no circumstances shall this Consent Decree or the name of the State of Washington or the Office of the Attorney General or any of its employees or representatives be used by Defendant or by its principals, officers, directors, agents, managers, employees, or representatives for endorsement or promotion of any business activity of Defendant. A violation of this paragraph constitutes a violation of an injunctive term of this Consent Decree. 10.2. This Consent Decree shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of Defendant's successors and assigns. Defendant and its successors and assigns shall notify the 23 State at least thirty (30) days prior to any change-in-control of Defendant that would change the identity of the corporate entity responsible for compliance obligations arising under this Consent Decree, including but not limited to dissolution, assignment,_ sale, merger, or other CONSENT DECREE 8 ATTORNEY GENERAL OF WASHINGTON Seattle, WA 99104-38

1'' 2 1' 3 i 4 5 6 7 8 9 I action that would result in the emergence of a successor corporation; or the creation or dissolution of a subsidiary, parent, or affiliate that engages in any acts or practices subject to this order. "A change-in-control of Defendant" does not include the sale of property managed by Defendant but owned by a third-party entity. "A change-in-control of Defendant" also does not include a change in management when either Defendant or the owner of the property terminates the management contract. 10.3. Nothing in this Consent Decree shall be construed to limit or bar any other governmental entity or person from pursuing other available remedies against Defendant or any other person. 10 11 Approved on this day of,. 12 13 7_3 Presented by: ROBERT W. FERGUSON Attorney Gene MARSHA d4en, WSBA #470 Assistant Attorney General Office of the Attorney General " Seattle, WA 98104 (6) 464-5342 marshac(a ),atg.wa.gov JUDGE/COURT COMISSIONER I Agreed to and approved for entry by: CONSENT DECREE 9 ATTORNEY GENERAL OF WASHINGTON (6) 442-4492

, 1 2 3 4 JEANA K. POLONI Loeffler Law Group, PLLC 500 Union Street, Suite 10 Seattle WA 98101 On Behalf of Defendant Coho Real Estate, LLC 5 6 7 8 12 U 23 CONSENT DECREE 10 ATTORNEY GENERAL OF WASHINGTON

2 4 rel 10 11 12 13 APPENDIX A NONDISCRIMINATION POLICY It is the policy of Coho Real Estate Group, LLC to comply with Title VIII of the Civil Rights Act of 68, as amended, commonly known as the Fair Housing Act, the Washington Law Against Discrimination, and the Washington Consumer Protection Act, by ensuring that apartments are available to all persons without regard to race, color, religion, national origin, disability, familial status, or sex. This policy means that, among other things, Coho Real Estate Group, LLC, and all their agents and employees with the responsibility for showing, renting, or managing any dwelling units must not discriminate in any aspect of the rental of dwellings against qualified applicants or tenants. Specifically, they may not: A. Refuse to rent, refuse to negotiate for the rental of, or otherwise make unavailable or deny, a dwelling to any person based on criminal history without considering when the conviction occurred, what the underlying conduct entailed, and what the convicted person has done since the conviction; B. Make, print, or publish, or cause to be made, printed, or published any notice, statement, or advertisement, with respect to the rental of a dwelling that indicates any preference, limitation, or discrimination based on criminal history alone; or C. Represent to persons because of an applicant's criminal history that any dwelling is not available for inspection or rental when such dwelling is in fact so available. Any agent or employee who fails to comply with this Nondiscrimination Policy will be subject to appropriate disciplinary action. Any action taken by an agent or employee that results in unequal service to, treatment of, or behavior toward tenants or actual or potential applicants on the basis of race, color, religion, national origin, disability, familial status, or sex may constitute a violation of state and federal fair housing laws. Any tenant or applicant who believes that any of the above policies have been violated by any owner, agent, or employee may contact the Washington Attorney General's office toll-free at (844) 323-3864 or the Washington State Human Rights Commission at (800) 233-37. 23 CONSENT DECREE 1 1 ATTORNEY GENERAL OF WASHINGTON

1' 2 4' 5 6 7 APPENDIX B ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF RECEIPT OF CONSENT ORDER AND NONDISCRIMINATION POLICY I acknowledge that on ; _, I was provided copies of the Consent Decree entered by the Court in State of Washington v. Coho Real Estate Group, LLC, Civil Action No. (King County Superior Court) and the Nondiscrimination Policy adopted by Defendant Coho Real Estate Group, LLC pursuant thereto. I have read and understand these documents and have had my questions about these documents answered. I understand my legal responsibilities and shall comply with those responsibilities. 8, 9 10 11 12 U Signature Print Name -Job Title/Position Date 23 CONSENT DECREE 12 ATTORNEY GENERAL OF WASHINGTON

1 2 3 4 APPENDIX C EMPLOYEE TRAINING ACKNOWLEDGMENT I acknowledge that on, I received minutes of inperson fair housing training. 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Signature Print Name Job Title/Position Date 13 23. CONSENT DECREE j; ATTORNEY GENERAL OF WASHINGTON