Modern Japanese Diplomacy (2011 winter) Reference Documents for 21 October

Similar documents
Citation: 3.3 U.S.T.I.A Provided by: Wheat Law Library

Hey, Lets Go To France Anne Stemmerman Westwood Middle School. Suggested Grade Level: High School; American History/Government

Charter United. Nations. International Court of Justice. of the. and Statute of the

Charter of the United Nations and Statute of the International Court of Justice

CHARTER OF THE UNITED NATIONS

CHARTER OF THE UNITED NATIONS With introductory note and Amendments

CHARTER OF THE UNITED NATIONS. We the Peoples of the United Nations United for a Better World

CHARTER OF THE UNITED NATIONS TABLE OF CONTENTS:

Charter of the United Nations

Korea, Republic of (South Korea) International Extradition Treaty with the United States

WikiLeaks Document Release

Austria International Extradition Treaty with the United States. Message from the President of the United States

U.S. and Japan Mutual Defense Assistance Agreement

l. The status quo in Outer-Mongolia (The Mongolian People's Republic) shall be preserved;

CHARTER OF THE UNITED NATIONS

EXTRADITION TREATY BETWEEN THE GOVERNMENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA AND THE GOVERNMENT OF THE HASHEMITE KINGDOM OF JORDAN

SELECTED INTERNATIONAL AGREEMENTS VOLUME II

THE COVENANT OF THE LEAGUE OF NATIONS

BYLAWS CALIFORNIA SOCCER ASSOCIATION-NORTH. (A California Nonprofit Mutual Benefit Corporation)

In witness whereof the undersigned have signed the present Agreement.

Cold War Frontiers in the Asia-Pacific: The Troubling Legacy of the San Francisco Treaty

Poland International Extradition Treaty with the United States MESSAGE FROM THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES

BILATERAL EXTRADITION TREATIES JORDAN EXTRADITION TREATY WITH JORDAN TREATY DOC U.S.T. LEXIS 215. March 28, 1995, Date-Signed

Treaty between the Federal Republic of Germany and Ceylon for the Promotion and Reciprocal Protection of Investments.

The provisions in this Treaty follow generally the form and content of extradition treaties recently concluded by the United States.

UNITED NATIONS CONVENTION AGAINST TRANSNATIONAL ORGANIZED CRIME

UNITED KINGDOM OF GREAT BRITAIN AND NORTHERN IRELAND

The provisions in this Treaty follow generally the form and content of extradition treaties recently concluded by the United States.

MESSAGE FROM THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES

TRANSMITTING EXTRADITION TREATY BETWEEN THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA AND THE REPUBLIC OF PERU, SIGNED AT LIMA ON JULY 26, 2001

St. Kitts and Nevis International Extradition Treaty with the United States

Sri Lanka International Extradition Treaty with the United States MESSAGE FROM THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES

London Agreement (8 August 1945)

The provisions in this Treaty follow generally the form and content of extradition treaties recently concluded by the United States.

INTER-AMERICAN CONVENTION ON SERVING CRIMINAL SENTENCES ABROAD

The provisions in this Treaty follow generally the form and content of extradition treaties recently concluded by the United States.

PRIVILEGES AND IMMUNITIES ACT

BILATERAL EXTRADITION TREATIES INDIA EXTRADITION TREATY WITH INDIA TREATY DOC U.S.T. LEXIS 97. June 25, 1997, Date-Signed

Barbados International Extradition Treaty with the United States

The 46 Antarctic Treaty nations represent about two-thirds of the world's human population.

AGREEMENT ON CONSULAR RELATIONS BETWEEN JAPAN AND THE PEOPLE S REPUBLIC OF CHINA

The Emperor s Surrender Radio Broadcast

P.R. China-Korea Extradition Treaty

VIENNA CONVENTION ON DIPLOMATIC RELATIONS. DONE AT VIENNA, ON APRIL 1961

6/7/2016 Outer Space Treaty. Outer Space Treaty

Signed February 11, 2004; provisionally applied from February 11, 2004; entered into force December 9, 2004.

BETWEEN THE REPUBLIC OF AUSTRIA AND MUTUAL LEGAL ASSISTANCE IN CRIMINAL MATTERS

MUTUAL LEGAL ASSISTANCE

EXTRADITION TREATY BETWEEN THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA AND THE GOVERNMENT OF THE REPUBLIC OF LATVIA, SIGNED ON DECEMBER 7, 2005, AT RIGA.

TREATY ON PRINCIPLES GOVERNING THE ACTIVITIES OF STATES IN THE EXPLORATION AND USE OF OUTER SPACE, INCLUDING THE MOON AND OTHER CELESTIAL BODIES

Power Struggle and Diplomatic Crisis: Past, Present and Prospects of Sino Japanese Relations over the Senkaku Conundrum

Nuremberg Charter (Charter of the International Military Tribunal) (1945)

7. Jurisdiction 8. Extradition 9. Regulations FIRST SCHEDULE SECOND SCHEDULE

Council of Europe Convention on the Prevention of Terrorism *

Canada International Extradition Treaty-First Protocol with the United States

Agreement for. the Promotion and Protection of Investment. between the Republic of Austria. and. the Federal Republic of Nigeria

BILATERAL EXTRADITION TREATIES PANAMA TREATY PANAMA, MAY 25, 1904

Treaty of Peace Between the United States and Spain; December 10, 1898

OBJECTS AND REASONS. Arrangement of Sections. 4. Insertion of a new PART IVA into Cap 140A. 5. Amendment to the Schedule to Cap. 140A.

Treaty concerning the Archipelago of Spitsbergen, and Protocol (Paris, 9 February 1920) TREATY CONCERNING THE ARCHIPELAGO OF SPITSBERGEN

Australia-Malaysia Extradition Treaty

PCNICC/2000/WGCA/INF/1

Extradition Treaty between the United States of America and the Argentine Republic

F.I.C.A.C. Established October Proposed amendments to the VIENNA CONVENTION

A/CONF.217/CRP.1. Draft of the Arms Trade Treaty. United Nations Conference on the Arms Trade Treaty New York, 2-27 July 2012

Official Journal of the European Union COUNCIL OF EUROPE CONVENTION ON THE PREVENTION OF TERRORISM

Convention for the Protection and Development of the Marine Environment of the Wider Caribbean Region

Agency for the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons in Latin America and the Caribbean

Australia-Korea Extradition Treaty

The Government of the Hungarian People's Republic and the Government of the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics,

Agreement. The Federal Republic of Germany and the People's Republic of Bangladesh, Desiring to intensify economic co-operation between both States,

CHAPTER 1 BASIC RULES AND PRINCIPLES

Korea-Philippines Extradition Treaty

1 of 100 DOCUMENTS. U.S. Treaties on LEXIS FRANCE EXTRADITION TREATY WITH FRANCE TREATY DOC U.S.T. LEXIS 53. April 23, 1996, Date-Signed

The Government of the Republic of Korea and the Government of the People's Republic of

SOUTHERN AFRICAN DEVELOPMENT COMMUNITY PROTOCOL ON EXTRADITION TABLE OF CONTENTS:

INTERNATIONAL MILITARY TRIBUNAL FOR THE FAR EAST

Proliferation Security Initiative Ship Boarding Agreement with the Bahamas

Plenary v. Concurrent Powers

TREATY BETWEEN THE GOVERNMENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA AND THE GOVERNMENT OF THE KINGDOM OF THAILAND RELATING TO EXTRADITION

TREATY BETWEEN THE U.S. AND THE U.K.

INTERNATIONAL CONVENTION FOR THE SUPPRESSION OF THE FINANCING OF TERRORISM

THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES

International Convention for the Suppression of the Financing of T...

Republic of Trinidad and Tobago

E. Agreement Governing the Activities of States on the Moon and Other Celestial Bodies

France, Germany, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland and United States of America: draft resolution

VIENNA CONVENTION ON THE LAW OF TREATIES

INTERNATIONAL CONVENTION FOR THE UNIFICATION OF CERTAIN RULES CONCERNING THE IMMUNITY OF STATE-OWNED SHIPS. (Brussels, April 10th, 1926) and

Further recalling the general principle of the protection of the civilian population against the effects of hostilities,

RESOLUTION ADOPTED BY THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY. 54/109. International Convention for the Suppression of the Financing of Terrorism

Italy International Extradition Treaty with the United States

BYLAWS THE UCLA ALUMNI ASSOCIATION (A NON-PROFIT PUBLIC BENEFIT CORPORATION) As Amended 06/03/17 ARTICLE I MEMBERS ARTICLE II BOARD OF DIRECTORS

AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE

Declaration on the Interpretation and Implementation of the Convention on the Future Multilateral Cooperation in North-East Atlantic Fisheries

BYLAWS OF 501c3 CORPORATION. 1.1 NAME. The name of the corporation is.

PROTOCOL ON ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION TO THE ANTARCTIC TREATY

Report of the Ad Hoc Committee established by General Assembly resolution 51/210 of 17 December 1996

UNITED NATIONS TREATIES AND PRINCIPLES ON OUTER SPACE

MUTUAL LEGAL ASSISTANCE

Transcription:

Modern Japanese Diplomacy (2011 winter) Reference Documents for 21 October *Related chapter in Iokibe s edited volume, The Diplomatic History of Postwar Japan: Chapter 2 Conditions of an independent state: Japanese diplomacy in the 1950s 1. NSC 13/2 (Recommendation with Respect to US Policy to Japan, Oct. 7, 1948) I. The Peace Treaty 1. Timing and Procedure. This Government should not press for a treaty of peace at this time. It should remain prepared to proceed with the negotiations, under either the two-thirds rule or the FEC voting procedure, if at any time the other Allied powers can agree among themselves on one of these procedures. Meanwhile, we should concentrate our attention on the preparation of the Japanese for the eventual removal of the regime of control. 2. The Nature of the Treaty. It should be our aim to have the treaty, when finally negotiated, as brief, as general, and as nonpunitive as possible. To this end we should try to clear away during this intervening period, by direct action, as many as possible of the matters which might otherwise be expected to enter into the treaty of peace. Our aim should be to reduce as far as possible the number of questions to be treated in the peace treaty. This applies particularly to such matters as property rights, restitution, etc. Our policy for the coming period should be shaped specifically with this in mind. II. Security Matters 1. Disposition of our Tactical Forces in the Pre-Treaty Period. Tactical forces should be retained in Japan for the coming period; but every effort should be made to reduce to a minimum their numbers, their cost to the Japanese economy, and the psychological impact of their presence on the Japanese population. The arrangements for their location, support, and employment should be determined with this in mind. 2. The Post-Treaty Arrangements. The United States tactical forces should be retained in Japan until the entrance into effect of a peace treaty. A final U.S. position concerning the post-treaty arrangements for Japanese military security should not be formulated until the peace negotiations are upon us. It should then be formulated in the light of the prevailing international situation and of the degree of internal stability achieved in Japan. If Russia has not been extensively weakened 1

and sobered by that time or if Japanese society still seems excessively vulnerable in the political sense, we should either postpone the treaty or insist on a limited remilitarization of Japan, preferably under U.S. guidance and supervision. But if by that time the Russian situation should really have changed for the better and if we are reasonably confident of the internal stability of Japan, we should aim at a complete demilitarization, guaranteed by an international treaty of the most explicit and concrete nature, to which the Russians would be a party. 3. Okinawa. The United States Government should make up its mind at this point that it intends to retain permanently the facilities at Okinawa, and the base there should be developed accordingly. The problem of obtaining international sanction for our permanent strategic control of the islands should be studied at once in the Department of State. 4. The Navy. The Navy should retain until the peace treaty its present facilities in Japan. It should shape its policy in the development of the Yokosuka base in such a way as to favor the retention on a commercial basis in the post-treaty period of as many as possible of the facilities it now enjoys there. Meanwhile, it should proceed to develop to the maximum the possibilities of Okinawa as an advance naval base, on the assumption that we will remain permanently in control there. 5. The Japanese Police Establishment. The Japanese police establishment should be strengthened by the reinforcing and re-equipping of the present forces, by the creation of a strong and effective coast guard, and by the establishment of a central organization, under American expert supervision, along the lines of our FBI. SANACC should be directed to work out the detailed directives to SCAP for the implementation of this recommendation. 2. Treaty of Peace with Japan (September 8, 1951) Whereas the Allied Powers and Japan are resolved that henceforth their relations shall be those of nations which, as sovereign equals, cooperate in friendly association to promote their common welfare and to maintain international peace and security, and are therefore desirous of concluding a Treaty of Peace which will settle questions still outstanding as a result of the existence of a state of war between them; 2

Whereas Japan for its part declares its intention to apply for membership in the United Nations and in all circumstances to conform to the principles of the Charter of the United Nations; to strive to realize the objectives of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights; to seek to create within Japan conditions of stability and well-being as defined in Articles 55 and 56 of the Charter of the United Nations and already initiated by post-surrender Japanese legislation; and in public and private trade and commerce to conform to internationally accepted fair practices; Whereas the Allied Powers welcome the intentions of Japan set out in the foregoing paragraph; The Allied Powers and Japan have therefore determined to conclude the present Treaty of Peace, and have accordingly appointed the undersigned Plenipotentiaries, who, after presentation of their full powers, found in good and due form, have agreed on the following provisions: CHAPTER II TERRITORY Article 2 (a) Japan, recognizing the independence of Korea, renounces all right, title, and claim to Korea, including the islands of Quelpart, Port Hamilton and Dagelet. (b) Japan renounces all right, title and claim to Formosa and the Pescadores. (c) Japan renounces all right, title and claim to the Kurile Islands, and to that portion of Sakhalin and the islands adjacent to it over which Japan acquired sovereignty as a consequence of the Treat of Portsmouth of September, 5, 1905. (d) Japan renounces all right, title and claims in connection with the League of Nations Mandate System, and accepts the action of the United Nations Security Council of April 2, 1947, extending the trusteeship system to the Pacific Islands formerly under mandate to Japan. (e) Japan renounces all claims to any right or title to or interest in connection with any part of the Antarctic area, whether deriving from the activities of Japanese nationals or otherwise. (f) Japan renounces all right, title and claim to the Spratly Islands and to the Paracel Islands. Article 3 Japan will concur in any proposal of the United States to the United Nations to place under its trusteeship system, with the United States as the sole administering authority, Nansei Shoto south of 29Knorth latitude (including the Ryukyu Islands and the Daito Islands), Nanpo Shoto 3

south of Sofu Gan (including the Bonin Islands, Rosario Island and the Volcano Islands) and Parece Vela and Marcus Island. Pending the making of such a proposal and affirmative action thereon, the United States will have the right to exercise all and any powers of administration, legislation and jurisdiction over the territory and inhabitants of these islands, including their territorial waters. CHAPTER III SECURITY Article 5 (a) Japan accepts the obligations set forth in Article 2 of the Charter of the United Nations, and in particular the obligations. (i) to settle its international disputes by peaceful means in such a manner that international peace and security, and justice, are not endangered; (ii) to refrain in its international relations from the threat or use of force against the territorial integrity or political independence of any State or in any other manner inconsistent with the Purposes of the United Nations; (iii) to give the United Nations every assistance in any action it takes in accordance with the Charter and to refrain from giving assistance to any State against which the United Nations may take preventive or enforcement action. (b) The Allied Powers confirm that they will be guided by the principles of Article 2 of the Charter of the United Nations in their relations with Japan. (c) The Allied Powers for their part recognize that Japan as a sovereign nation possesses the inherent right of individual or collective self-defense referred to in Article 51 of the Charter of the United Nations and that Japan may voluntarily enter into collective security arrangements. Article 6 (a) All occupation forces of the Allied Powers shall be withdrawn from Japan as soon as possible after the coming into force of the present Treaty, and in any case not later than 90 days thereafter. Nothing in this provision shall, however, prevent the stationing or retention of foreign armed forces in Japanese territory under or in consequence of any bilateral or multilateral agreements which have been or may be made between one or more of the Allied Powers, on the one hand, and Japan on the other. 4

(b) The provisions of Article 9 of the Potsdam Proclamation of July 26, 1945, dealing with the return of Japanese military forces to their homes, to the extent not already completed, will be carried out. (c) All Japanese property for which compensation has not already been paid, which was supplied for the use of the occupation forces and which remains in the possession of those forces at the time of the coming into force of the present Treaty, shall be returned to the Japanese Government within the same 90 days unless other arrangements are made by mutual agreement. CHAPTER IV POLITICAL AND ECONOMIC CLAUSES Article 11 Japan accepts the judgments of the International Military Tribunal for the Far East and of other Allied War Crimes Courts both within and outside Japan, and will carry out the sentences imposed thereby upon Japanese nationals imprisoned in Japan. The power to grant clemency, to reduce sentences and to parole with respect to such prisoners may not be exercised except on the decision of the Government or Governments which imposed the sentence in each instance, and on the recommendation of Japan. In the case of persons sentenced by the International Military Tribunal for the Far East, such power may not be exercised except on the decision of a majority of the Governments represented on the Tribunal, and on the recommendation of Japan. CHAPTER V CLAIMS AND PROPERTY Article 14 (a) It is recognized that Japan should pay reparations to the Allied Powers for the damage and suffering caused by it during the war. Nevertheless it is also recognized that the resources of Japan are not presently sufficient, if it is to maintain a viable economy, to make complete reparation for all such damage and suffering and at the same time meet its other obligations. Therefore, 1. Japan will promptly enter into negotiations with Allied Powers so desiring, whose present territories were occupied by Japanese forces and damaged by Japan, with a view to assisting to compensate those countries for the cost of repairing the damage done, by making available the 5

services of the Japanese people in production, salvaging and other work for the Allied Powers in question. Such arrangements shall avoid the imposition of additional liabilities on other Allied Powers, and, where the manufacturing of raw materials is called for, they shall be supplied by the Allied Powers in question, so as not to throw any foreign exchange burden upon Japan. 2. (I) Subject to the provisions of subparagraph (II) below, each of the Allied Powers shall have the right to seize, retain, liquidate or otherwise dispose of all property, rights and interests of (a) Japan and Japanese nationals, (b) persons acting for or on behalf of Japan or Japanese nationals, and (c) entities owned or controlled by Japan or Japanese nationals, which on the first coming into force of the present Treaty were subject to its jurisdiction. The property, rights and interests specified in this sub-paragraph shall include those now blocked, vested or in the possession or under the control of enemy property authorities of Allied Powers, which belonged to, or were held or managed on behalf of, any of the persons or entities mentioned in (a), (b) or (c) above at the time such assets came under the controls of such authorities. (II) The following shall be excepted from the right specified in sub-paragraph (I) above: (i) property of Japanese natural persons who during the war resided with the permission of the Government concerned in the territory of one of the Allied Powers, other than territory occupied by Japan, except property subjected to restrictions during the war and not released from such restrictions as of the date of the first coming into force the present Treaty; (ii) All real property, furniture and fixtures owned by the Government of Japan and used for diplomatic or consular purposes, and all personal furniture and furnishings and other private property not of an investment nature which was normally, necessary for the carrying out of diplomatic and consular functions, owned by Japanese" diplomatic and consular personnel; (iii) property belonging to religious bodies or private charitable institutions and used exclusively for religious or charitable purposes; (iv) property, rights and interests which have come within its jurisdiction in consequence of the resumption of trade and financial relations subsequent to September 2, 1945, between the 6

country concerned and Japan, except such as have resulted from transactions contrary to the laws of the Allied Power concerned; (v) obligations of Japan or Japanese nationals, any right, title or interest in tangible property located in Japan, interests in enterprises organized under the laws of Japan, or any paper evidence thereof; provided that this exception shall only apply to obligations of Japan and its nationals expressed in Japanese currency. (III) Property referred to in exceptions (i) through (v) above shall be returned subject to reasonable expenses for its preservation and administration. If any such property has been liquidated the proceeds shall be returned instead. (IV) The right to seize, retain, liquidate or otherwise dispose of property as provided in sub-paragraph (I) above shall be exercised in accordance with the laws of the Allied Power concerned, and the owner shall have only such rights as may be given him by those laws. (V) The Allied Powers agree to deal with Japanese trademarks and literary and artistic property rights on a basis as favorable to Japan as circumstances ruling in each country will permit. (b) Except as otherwise provided in the present Treaty, the Allied Powers waive all reparations claims of the Allied Powers, other claims of the Allied Powers and their nationals arising out of any actions taken by Japan and its nationals in the course of the prosecution of the war, and claims of the Allied Powers for direct military costs of occupation. Article 19 (a) Japan waives all claims of Japan and its nationals against the Allied Powers and their nationals arising out of the war or out of actions taken because of the existence of a state of war, and waives all claims arising from the presence, operations or actions of forces or authorities of any of the Allied Powers in Japanese territory prior to the coming into force of the present Treaty. (b) The foregoing waiver includes any claims arising out of actions taken by any of the Allied Powers with respect to Japanese ships between September l, 1939, and the coming into force of the present Treaty, as well as any claims and debts arising in respect to Japanese prisoners of war and civilian internees in the hands of the Allied Powers, but does not include Japanese claims specifically recognized in the laws of any Allied Power enacted since September 2, 1945. 7

(c) Subject to reciprocal renunciation, the Japanese Government also renounces all claims (including debts) against Germany and German nationals on behalf of the Japanese Government and Japanese nationals, including inter-governmental claims and claims for loss or damage sustained during the war, but excepting (a) claims in respect of contracts entered into and rights acquired before September 1, 1939, and (b) claims arising out of trade and financial relations between Japan and Germany after September 2, 1945. Such renunciation shall not prejudice actions taken in accordance with Articles 16 and 20 of the present Treaty. (d) Japan recognizes the validity of all acts and omissions done during the period of occupation under or in consequence of directives of the occupation authorities or authorized by Japanese law at that time, and will take no action subjecting Allied nationals to civil or criminal liability arising out of such acts or omissions. 3. Security Treaty Between Japan and the United States of America (Sep. 8, 1951) Japan has this day signed a Treaty of Peace with the Allied Powers. On the coming into force of that Treaty, Japan will not have the effective means to exercise its inherent right of self-defense because it has been disarmed. There is danger to Japan in this situation because irresponsible militarism has not yet been driven from the world. Therefore Japan desires a Security Treaty with the United States of America to come into force simultaneously with the Treaty of Peace between Japan and the United States of America. The Treaty of Peace recognizes that Japan as a sovereign nation has the right to enter into collective security arrangements, and further, the Charter of the United Nations recognizes that all nations possess an inherent right of individual and collective self-defense. In exercise of these rights, Japan desires, as a provisional arrangement for its defense, that the United States of America should maintain armed forces of its own in and about Japan so as to deter armed attack upon Japan. The United States of America, in the interest of peace and security, is presently willing to maintain certain of its armed forces in and about Japan, in the expectation, however, that Japan will itself increasingly assume responsibility for its own defense against direct and indirect aggression, always avoiding any armament which could be an offensive threat or serve other 8

than to promote peace and security in accordance with the purposes and principles of the United Nations Charter. Accordingly, the two countries have agreed as follows: ARTICLE I Japan grants, and the United States of America accepts, the right, upon the coming into force of the Treaty of Peace and of this Treaty, to dispose United States land, air and sea forces in and about Japan. Such forces may be utilized to contribute to the maintenance of international peace and security in the Far East and to the security of Japan against armed attack from without, including assistance given at the express request of the Japanese Government to put down large-scale internal riots and disturbances in Japan, caused through instigation or intervention by an outside power or powers. ARTICLE II During the exercise of the right referred to in Article I, Japan will not grant, without the prior consent of the United States of America, any bases or any rights, powers or authority whatsoever, in or relating to bases or the right of garrison or of maneuver, or transit of ground, air or naval forces to any third power. ARTICLE III The conditions which shall govern the disposition of armed forces of the United States of America in and about Japan shall be determined by administrative agreements between the two Governments. ARTICLE IV This Treaty shall expire whenever in the opinion of the Governments of Japan and the United States of America there shall have come into force such United Nations arrangements or such alternative individual or collective security dispositions as will satisfactorily provide for the maintenance by the United Nations or otherwise of international peace and security in the Japan Area. 9

ARTICLE V This Treaty shall be ratified by Japan and the United States of America and will come into force when instruments of ratification thereof have been exchanged by them at Washington. IN WITNESS WHEREOF the undersigned Plenipotentiaries have signed this Treaty. DONE in duplicate at the city of San Francisco, in the Japanese and English languages, this eighth day of September, 1951. FOR JAPAN: Shigeru Yoshida FOR THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; Dean Acheson John Foster Dulles Alexander Wiley Styles Bridges 4. The Vandenberg Resolution (Senate Resolution 239) (June 11, 1948) Whereas peace with justice and the defense of human rights and fundamental freedoms require international cooperation through more effective use of the United Nations: Therefore be it Resolved, That the Senate reaffirm the policy of the United States to achieve international peace and security through the United Nations so that armed force shall not be used except in the common interest, and that the President be advised of the sense of the Senate that this Government, by constitutional process, should particularly pursue the following objectives within the United Nations Charter: (1) Voluntary agreement to remove the veto from all questions involving pacific settlements of international disputes and situations, and from the admission of new members. (2) Progressive development of regional and other collective arrangements for individual and collective self-defense in accordance with the purposes, principles, and provisions of the Charter. 10

(3) Association of the United States, by constitutional process, with such regional and other collective arrangements as are based on continuous and effective self-help and mutual aid, and as affect its national security. (4) Contributing to the maintenance of peace by making clear its determination to exercise the right of individual or collective self-defense under article 51 should any armed attack occur affecting its national security. (5) Maximum efforts to obtain agreements to provide the United Nations with armed forces as provided by the Charter, and to obtain agreement among member nations upon universal regulation and reduction of armaments under adequate and dependable guaranty against violation. (6) If necessary, after adequate effort toward strengthening the United Nations, review of the Charter at an appropriate time by a general conference called under article 109 or by the General Assembly. (END) 11