After Final Practice and Appeal

Similar documents
AGENCY: United States Patent and Trademark Office, Commerce. SUMMARY: The United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) has modified

Delain Law Office, PLLC

United States Patent and Trademark Office and Japan Patent Office Collaborative Search. AGENCY: United States Patent and Trademark Office, Commerce.

After Final Consideration Pilot Program 2.0 Description and Memorandum of Understanding. September 23,2014

Chapter 1900 Protest Protest Under 37 CFR [R ] How Protest Is Submitted

~O~rE~ OFFICE OF PETITIONS JAN Haisam Yakoub 2700 Saratoga Place #815 Ottawa ON K1T 1W4 CA CANADA

New Patent Application Rules Set to Take Effect November 1, 2007

1~~~rew OFFICE OF PETITIONS RELEVANT BACKGROUND OCT UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE

Information Disclosure Statements 2017 BIRCH, STEWART, KOLASCH & BIRCH, LLP

QUESTION PAPER REFERENCE: FC3 PERCENTAGE MARK AWARDED: 59% six months after the publication of European search report

America Invents Act (AIA) Post-Grant Proceedings

Relevant Excerpts of the Rules of the City of New York Title 61 - Office of Collective Bargaining Chapter 1 - Practice and Procedure

Changes To Implement the First Inventor To File Provisions of the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act Final Rules

By Howard L. Hoffenberg The IP and Business Law Offices of Howard L. Hoffenberg, Esq.

Petitions and Appeals in the USPTO

Moving Patent Applications Through the USPTO: Options for Applicants

Patent Term Patent Term Extension Patent Term Adjustment

Changes at the PTO. October 21, 2011 Claremont Hotel. Steven C. Carlson Fish & Richardson P.C. Bradley Baugh North Weber & Baugh LLP

K&L Gates Webinar Current Developments in Patents. Peggy Focarino Commissioner for Patents September 13 th, 2012

INTER PARTES REEXAMINATION MECHANICS AND RESULTS

August 31, I. Introduction

Strategic Use of Post-Grant Proceedings In Light of Patent Reform

United States Patent and Trademark Office Registration Examination for Patent Attorneys and Agents April 18, Morning Session Model Answers

Will the Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences Rely Upon Dictionary Definitions Newly. Cited in Appeal Briefs? Answer: It Depends

POST-GRANT REVIEW UNDER THE AMERICA INVENTS ACT GERARD F. DIEBNER TANNENBAUM, HELPERN, SYRACUSE & HIRSCHTRITT LLP

Get Your Design Patent Fast!

Accelerated Examination. Presented by Hans Troesch, Principal Fish & Richardson P.C. March 2, 2010

US Patent Prosecution Duty to Disclose

USPTO Post Grant Proceedings

PATENTS TRADEMARKS COPYRIGHTS TRADE SECRETS ZIOLKOWSKI PATENT SOLUTIONS GROUP, SC INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY ATTORNEYS. Patent Process FAQs

IP CONCLAVE 2010, MUMBAI STRATEGIES WITH US PATENT PRACTICE NAREN THAPPETA US PATENT ATTORNEY & INDIA PATENT AGENT BANGALORE, INDIA

Part V: Derivation & Post Grant Review

Chapter 2500 Maintenance Fees

The Serious Burden Requirement Has Teeth - A Prohibition on Restriction Requirements Later in Prosecution

America Invents Act (AIA) Post-Grant Proceedings. Jeffrey S. Bergman Kevin Kuelbs Laura Witbeck

America Invents Act of 2011 Part 1: Impact on Litigation Strategy Part 2: Strategic Considerations of the FTF Transition

UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE TRADEMARK MANUAL OF EXAMINING PROCEDURE (TMEP) Chapter 600 Attorney, Representative, and Signature

USPTO Final Rule Changes for Continuations and Claims. John B. Pegram Ronald C. Lundquist August 30, 2007

Patents and the Protection of Proprietary Biotechnology Information

USPTO PATENT EXAMINATION ACCELERATION PROGRAMS AND PROPOSALS

USPTO Trials: Understanding the Scope and Rules of Discovery

Introduction. 1 These materials are public information and have been prepared solely for educational and entertainment purposes to contribute

Patent Prosecution Under The AIA

PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE 1 (REVISION 15) ASSIGNMENT OF JUDGES TO PANELS

Tips On Maximizing Patent Term Adjustment

IPDAS Forms Library: A Complete List

Improving the Accuracy of the Trademark Register: Request for Comments on Possible

The Scope and Ramifications of the New Post-Grant and Inter Partes Review Proceedings at the USPTO

AMERICA INVENTS ACT. Changes to Patent Law. Devan Padmanabhan Shareholder, Winthrop & Weinstine

PATENT PROSECUTION STRATEGIES IN AN AIA WORLD: SUCCEEDING WITH THE CHANGES

Il ~ [E ~ OFFICE OF PETITtONS AUG BACKGROUND. Patricia Derrick DBA Brainpaths 4186 Melodia Songo CT Las Vegas NV

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

Post-Grant Patent Proceedings

PROCEDURES FOR INVALIDATING, CLARIFYING OR NARROWING A PATENT IN THE PATENT OFFICE UNDER THE AMERICA INVENTS ACT (AIA)

Newly Signed U.S. Patent Law Will Overhaul Patent Procurement, Enforcement and Defense

Patent Prosecution Update

Rick Neifeld, Neifeld IP Law, PC 1

The petition to change patent term adjustment determination under 35 U.S.C. 154(b) from 153 days to a 318 days is DENIED.

How to Manage Final Office Actions and Responses and RCE Practice

Do-Overs: Overviewing the Various Mechanisms for Reevaluating an Issued Patent and How They Have Changed Over the Last Five Years +

Recent Limitations On Patent Term Adjustment For 'A' Delay

New Post Grant Proceedings: Basics by

THOUGHTFUL STRATEGIES FOR AFTER-FINAL PRACTICE. Steven M. Greenberg Head of Practice

National Patent Board Non-Binding Arbitration Rules TABLE OF CONTENTS

United States Patent and Trademark Office Registration Examination for Patent Attorneys and Agents October 16, Morning Session Model Answers

POST GRANT REVIEW PROCEEDINGS IN THE PTO STEPHEN G. KUNIN PARTNER

Chapter 1800 Patent Cooperation Treaty

PUBLIC FINANICAL DISCLOSURE REVIEW PROCEDURES PRINCIPLE CANDIDATES FOR PRESIDENT OR VICE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES.

America Invents Act Implementing Rules. September 2012

Considerations for the United States

USPTO Post Grant Trial Practice

LOCAL OPERATING PROCEDURES IMMIGRATION COURT SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA

PATENT DISCLOSURE: Meeting Expectations in the USPTO

2001 through 2017 IPLEGALED, Inc. All Rights Reserved

Optional Appeal Procedures Available During the Planning Rule Transition Period

A Practical Guide to Inter Partes Review. Strategic Considerations Relating To Termination

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Trademark Regulations Title 37 - Code of Federal Regulations as amended on June 11, 2015, effective July 17, 2015.

Paper 24 Tel: Entered: October 9, 2018 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE

Monitoring Practitioner Compliance With Disciplinary Rules and Inequitable Conduct

U.S. Patent and Trademark Office Issues Proposed Rules for Post-Issuance Patent Review under the America Invents Act

UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE FOR PATENT ATTORNEYS AND AGENTS APRIL 15, 2003

Prosecuting an Israel Patent Application and Beyond

Streamlined Arbitration Rules and Procedures

Paper: 27 Tel: Entered: November, UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE

Presented to The Ohio State Bar Association. May 23, 2012

ADMINISTRATIVE RULES FOR CONTESTED CASE HEARINGS MUNICIPAL EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYSTEM OF MICHIGAN. Effective June 1, 2016 Amended June 19, 2017

Restriction: Definition & Characteristics A tool used by the USPTO to limit the substantive examination of a patent application to a single invention

Accelerating the Acquisition of an Enforceable Patent: Bypassing the USPTO s Backlog Lawrence A. Stahl and Seth E. Boeshore

John Doll Commissioner for Patents. February 1, 2006

SEC. 6. AIA: POST-GRANT REVIEW PROCEEDINGS

Financial Services Tribunal Rules 2015 (as amended 2017 and 2018)

Rules of the Equal Opportunities Commission November 10, 2016

America Invents Act H.R (Became Law: September 16, 2011) Michael K. Mutter Birch, Stewart, Kolasch & Birch October 11-12, 2011

Standing Committee on Patents. Questionnaire on the Publication of Patent Applications India Section

Patent Prosecution in View of The America Invents Act. Overview

Change in Procedure Relating to an Application Filing Date

UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE FOR PATENT ATTORNEYS AND AGENTS OCTOBER 16, Afternoon Session (50 Points)

AIA Post-Grant Proceedings: Lessons Learned from PTAB and Federal Circuit Decisions

Chapter 157. Hearings and Appeals. Subchapter EE. Informal Review, Formal Review, and Review by State Office of Administrative Hearings

Constitutional review by district court of administrative decisions and orders. A. Scope of rule. This rule governs writs of certiorari to

Transcription:

July 15, 2016 Steven M. Jensen, Member

Why is a Final Rejection Important? Substantive prosecution is closed Filing a response to a Final Office Action does not stop the time for responding Application will become abandoned at statutory deadline Co-pendency requirement for filing continuation applications 2

After Final Practice When is a Final Rejection proper? When to reply to a Final Rejection? Effect of reply on Statutory Period for Reply How to reply to a Final Rejection? Practice tips 3

When is a Final Rejection Proper? A Final Rejection is intended to close prosecution of the application On second or any subsequent examination or consideration by Examiner (37 C.F.R. 1.113(a)), unless: Examiner introduces new ground of rejection that is Not necessitated by amendment of claims OR Not based on information submitted in Information Disclosure Statement (IDS) filed after non-final Office Action but before Final Office Action and accompanied by fee 4

When is a Final Rejection Proper? On first Office Action only if: Application is continuation of or substitute for earlier application, or after filing a Request for Continued Examination (RCE), AND All claims: Are drawn to same invention claimed in earlier application AND Would have been properly finally rejected on grounds or art of record in next Office Action if had been entered in earlier application 5

Request for Withdrawal of Premature Final Office Action A request for withdrawal of a premature Final Office Action can be filed if basis for finality is improper (i.e., premature ) File while application still before Examiner Not grounds for appeal Not basis of complaint before Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) Request for withdrawal of finality is not a response to Final Office Action If successful, Examiner will withdraw finality If unsuccessful, must still file response within time for reply Does not extend deadline for response 6

When to Reply to a Final Rejection? Three months from mailing date of Final Office Action Shortened Statutory Period (SSP) But SSP expires on mailing date of Advisory Action if: Reply filed within two months of mailing date (expedited handling) of Final Office Action AND Advisory Action not mailed until after end of three months from mailing date of Final Office Action In this case, extension fees are calculated from the Advisory Action mailing date BUT cannot extend past six months from Final Office Action mailing date 7

When to Reply to a Final Rejection? No later than six months from mailing date of Final Office Action Statutory Period (SP) Replies filed after expiration of SSP will require payment of extension fees Period for reply cannot be extended beyond six months from mailing date under any circumstances Application must be allowed, or a Notice of Appeal or Request for Continued Examination (RCE) must be filed, by the end of the statutory period Filing only a response does not stop period for reply 8

Effect of Reply on Statutory Period for Replying to a Final Office Action Replies that stop the running of the Statutory Period: Filing of a Notice of Appeal Begins the period for filing an Appeal Brief Can still file a response after filing of a Notice of Appeal Filing of a Request for Continued Examination (RCE) 9

Effect of Reply on Statutory Period for Replying to a Final Office Action Filing of Response/Amendment After Final Does NOT stop running of the statutory period (SP) for reply even if Examiner verbally indicates that he/she will allow the application and has entered the amendment -- need a Notice of Allowance mailed before SP If Notice of Allowance expected but not received by the end of SP, file a Notice of Appeal DOCKETING TIP Do not remove six month statutory period from docket until you filed a Notice of Appeal / Continuation Application / RCE or you have received a Notice of Allowance with a mailing date 10

How to Reply Response/ Amendment File an Amendment After Final (37 C.F.R. 1.116 (b)) File a Request for Continued Examination (RCE) (37 C.F.R. 1.114 (a)) File a Notice of Appeal Other actions to consider File Continuation Application File Divisional Application Discussed in Continuation Practice 11

How to Reply Response/ Amendment File an Amendment After Final (37 C.F.R. 1.116 (b)) Entry of proposed amendment is not a matter of right Examiner s discretion 37 C.F.R. 1.113(c)/1.116 (b)(1) Amendments will likely be entered that put application in condition for allowance by: Canceling each rejected claim AND/OR Complying with any requirement or objection as to form of allowed claim(s) 12

How to Reply - Response/ Amendment 37 C.F.R. 1.116 (b)(2) Amendments will likely be entered that: present rejected claims in better form for consideration on appeal 37 C.F.R. 1.116 (b)(3) Amendments touching merits may be admitted by showing of good and sufficient cause: Why they are necessary Why they were not earlier presented 13

How to Reply - After Final Consideration Pilot Program (AFCP 2.0) After Final Consideration Pilot Program (AFCP 2.0) Because of AFCP 2.0, after receiving a Final Office Action, it is often advisable to file an Amendment without a Request for Continued Examination (RCE). Current version of program (AFCP 2.0) available since 2013, now extended through September 30, 2016. One-page form (PTO/SB/434) filed with After Final Amendment: At least one independent claim is amended, but not broadened in any aspect; Applicant must agree to an interview at the Examiner's request; and No additional fee is required. Under AFCP 2.0, in certain circumstances, an Examiner will perform a search based on the substantive amendment USPTO's goal: reduce the number of RCEs, but USPTO has not released data as to effectiveness. 14

How to Reply - After Final Consideration Pilot Program (AFCP 2.0) Form (PTO-2323) issued in response to filing of AFCP 2.0 request: Search cannot be conducted within guidelines of program Examiner cannot search within allotted time (3 hours for utility application) Amendment After Final treated under normal practice All rejections are overcome, and Notice of Allowance issued Amendment After Final would not overcome all issues, and Advisory Action issued Amendment After Final raises new issues(s), and Advisory Action issued Interview Summary to be included in all cases in which an interview is conducted. Interview provides opportunity to present arguments, and may help advance prosecution even if Amendment After Final is not entered. 15

How to Reply - After Final Consideration Pilot Program (AFCP 2.0) Benefits/Practice Tips No additional cost, and can be filed with any Amendment After Final (if claims are amended without broadening) Requires Examiner to consider amendments/arguments without immediately filing a Request for Continued Examination (RCE) Interview provides another opportunity to discuss case, and may help advance prosecution In some cases, interview can result in further amendment(s) to avoid filing of RCE In most cases, an RCE must be filed subsequently, but claims may be crafted based on the PTO-2323, Advisory Action and/or Interview Summary, thus advancing prosecution. 16

How to Reply - After Final Consideration Pilot Program (AFCP 2.0) Summary AFCP 2.0 is a cost-effective tool for responding to a Final Office Action Even a minor amendment to one or more independent claim(s) is sufficient to file an AFCP 2.0 request Interview can be used to explain the claimed invention, and distinguish over cited references Even if interview does not result in allowance, can be helpful to advance prosecution 17

How to Reply RCE: RCE When to File RCE can only be filed when prosecution has been closed EXAMPLES: Final Office Action Application under Appeal (before or after an Appeal Brief is filed or a decision on appeal is rendered) Notice of Allowance issued Other action closing prosecution (e.g., Ex Parte Quayle Office Action) 18

How to Reply RCE RCE When to File RCE must be filed before: Abandonment Before payment of the issue fee Unless a petition to withdraw the application from issue is granted Filing a Notice of Appeal to the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit Commencing a civil action under 35 USC 145, 146 (District court) 19

How to Reply RCE: RCE Requirements of Submission An RCE submission can be IDS Amendment to the application Specification, claims or drawings New arguments New evidence (including Declarations) NOTE: If an Office Action is outstanding, the RCE submission must meet the requirements of 37 CFR 1.111 (for a complete reply to the Office Action) 20

How to Reply RCE: RCE USPTO Action An RCE can be filed in response to a Final Office Action and before payment of the Issue Fee If the RCE and submission are timely filed, the USPTO will withdraw finality of the Action and enter the submission Note that a first Office Action after an RCE can be a Final Office Action An improper RCE: Filing of an RCE request and payment of the fee does not stop the period for response to the Final Office Action Unless the RCE is used to enter a previously-filed response If there is no submission with an RCE before the end of the period to reply (or pay the Issue fee after a Notice of Allowance), the application will be abandoned 21

How to Reply RCE: RCE - USPTO Action If an Amendment is submitted with an RCE, canceling pending claims and introducing new claims directed to a different invention: USPTO will treat the RCE as proper BUT USPTO will not enter the amendment A Notice will be sent requiring a proper amendment RCE is not a substitute for filing a divisional application 22

RCE WHEN APPEAL PENDING: USPTO Action When RCE Proper Appeal pending Before a PTAB decision A proper RCE will include an RCE Request, with fee and a submission The submission should include arguments or amendments to avoid a new Final Office [MPEP-706.079(h), Para XI.A] USPTO treats the RCE as a request to withdraw the appeal» The submission will be entered and prosecution will be re-opened The PTAB should be notified of the RCE filing» If the PTAB renders a Decision on the Appeal after the RCE is filed, the PTAB may refuse to vacate that Decision if the USPTO did not recognize the RCE filing in time 23

RCE WHEN APPEAL PENDING: USPTO Action When RCE Improper Appeal pending Before PTAB Decision An improper RCE RCE without fee and/or proper submission [MPEP-706.079(h), Para X.B] USPTO treats the RCE as a request to withdraw the appeal, even if the RCE is improper under 37 CFR 1.114(d) USPTO will issue a Notice of Abandonment unless allowed claims are pending in the application» If allowed claims are pending, the appeal is withdrawn, the rejected claims will be cancelled, and the application will be passed to issue» Note that objected-to claims with allowable subject matter will be treated as rejected claims 24

RCE AFTER APPEAL DECISION: USPTO Action Appeal pending After PTAB Decision A proper RCE includes the RCE Request, fee, and a submission [MPEP-706.079(h), Para XI.A] USPTO will enter the submission and re-open prosecution» But the PTAB Decision will be law of the case An improper RCE missing the Request, fee, or submission [MPEP-706.079(h), Para XI.B] USPTO will notify the Applicant of the improper RCE filing A Notice of Abandonment (or Allowance, if allowable claims are pending) will be issued if the time period for seeking Federal Court review has expired. 25

RCE Procedure After Allowance RCE filing after allowance, before payment of the issue fee RCE process can be used by Applicant to re-open prosecution To consider additional prior art citations To further amend claims 26

RCE Procedure After Issue Fee Payment After Allowance and after payment of the issue fee RCE and petition requesting withdrawal of application from issue must be filed (MPEP- 1308/ 37 CFR 1.313) If petition to withdraw from issue is granted, the application will be withdrawn from issue The RCE and submission will be entered and prosecution will be re-opened Note that the QPIDS procedure may avoid the need for an RCE to enter an IDS in some circumstances 27

RCE What to do: Examples EXAMPLE 1 FACTS: Amendment in response to Final Office Action has been filed with USPTO Advisory Action received, refusing to enter amendments and indicating that further search and consideration would be required TO DO: File Request for Continued Examination (RCE) to force entry of the Amendment 28

RCE What to do: Examples EXAMPLE 2 FACTS: Amendment in response to Final Office Action prepared but not filed Extensive amendments to claims in draft Amendment After Final To do: OPTION 1 File Amendment After Final with an AFCP 2.0 request If Advisory Action is received, proceed as in Example 1 OPTION 2 File RCE with response to Final Office Action 29

RCE What to do: Examples EXAMPLE 3 FACTS: Final Office Action Response filed in USPTO Advisory Action received Notice of Appeal filed with Pre-Appeal Brief Request for Review (no re-opening of prosecution or allowance of claims) To do: OPTION 1 Continue with Appeal OPTION 2 File RCE with Response to Final Office Action OPTION 3 File RCE with a further or supplemental amendment 30

After Final Office Action: How to Reply Appeal after Final Rejection Pre-Appeal Brief Request for Review Appeal 31

How to Reply Appeal/Pre-Response/Amendment after Final Generally Applicant should consider need to file a Response/Amendment after Final Rejection To put case in better condition for appeal Eliminate objections as to form Recycle arguments in pre-appeal conference submission or in appeal brief 32

How to Reply Appeal/Pre-Appeal Additional Factors to Consider State of the Prosecution: Is case ready for Appeal? Technical vs. Legal Issues Technical issues may need additional prosecution Legal issues may fare better on appeal Available evidence If previously entered, case may be ripe for appeal If not yet entered, case may need additional prosecution Client goals 33

How to Reply Appeal/Pre-Appeal Appeal Pre-Appeal Brief Conference A clear legal or factual deficiency in the rejections rather than an interpretation of the claims or prior art teachings Applicant must file: Notice of Appeal with required fee Pre-Appeal Brief Request for Review Five-page limit Succinct, concise and focused set of arguments Specific reference to previous arguments Applicant must specify: Clear errors in Examiner s rejections Examiner s omission of one or more essential elements for a prima facie case 34

How to Reply Appeal/Pre-Appeal Appeal Pre-Appeal Brief Conference (cont'd) NOT Permitted: After Final or Proposed Amendments Petitionable matters Interpretations of the prior art Interpretations of the scope of the claims Unclear what constitutes appropriate subject matter No Supplemental Requests No interviews during Pre-Appeal Review period 35

How to Reply Appeal/Pre-Appeal Appeal Pre-Appeal Brief Conference (cont'd) Generally If uncertainty, then Pre-Appeal Brief Request should be considered Less expensive than Appeal Shorter review period If unsuccessful, arguments can be developed further for subsequent Appeal 36

How to Reply Appeal/Pre-Appeal Appeal Pre-Appeal Brief Conference (cont'd) Review: Panel of experienced examiners including: Examiner of record Examiner s Supervisor Applicant s representative not present Decision mailed within 45 days of Request 37

How to Reply Appeal/Pre-Appeal Appeal Pre-Appeal Brief Conference (cont'd) Possible findings/results: Application remains under appeal (at least 1 issue is unresolved) Prosecution reopened and new Office Action follows Application allowed and prosecution closes Request dismissed for failure to comply with requirements 38

How to Reply Appeal/Pre-Appeal Appeal Filing Can file Appeal after any claim rejected twice Last Office Action need not be final Need not be twice in the same application Cannot file Appeal concurrently with RCE Filing of RCE withdraws any previously filed Appeal Notice of Appeal due within period for reply to last Office Action File Notice of Appeal Pay Appeal Fee when filing Notice May be accompanied by an After Final Amendment 39

How to Reply Appeal/Pre-Appeal Appeal Appeal Brief Appeal Brief Due later of: One month from mailing date of Decision of Pre-Appeal Conference OR Two months from the receipt by USPTO of the Notice of Appeal Brief may not incorporate arguments by reference 40

How to Reply Appeal/Pre-Appeal Appeal Appeal Brief (cont'd) Appeal Brief (content/elements): Identification of the real party of interest Related appeals and interferences The status of the claims The status of any amendments A summary of claimed subject matter The grounds of rejection to be reviewed on appeal (each in a separate section) The argument The claims appendix The evidence appendix A related proceedings appendix 41

How to Reply Appeal/Pre-Appeal Appeal Amendment Amendments filed with or after Brief entered at Examiner s discretion only: To cancel claims To re-write dependent claims in independent form Other amendments and affidavits not usually admitted 42

How to Reply Appeal/Pre-Appeal Appeal Post Appeal Brief Filing After Appeal Brief filed, Examiner may: Re-open prosecution for new rejection or action Withdraw Final Rejection and allow case Maintain appeal and draft Examiner s Answer at Appeal Conference with Supervisor and another experienced Examiner Includes Response to arguments May include new ground of rejection 43

How to Reply Appeal/Pre-Appeal Appeal Post Appeal Brief Filing (cont'd) If new grounds of rejection, Applicant must request re-opening of prosecution or file Reply Brief in two months Additional rounds of Answer and Reply Briefs possible Appeal may be decided on briefs or Applicant may file Request for Oral Hearing Decision by Patent Trial and Appeal Board 44

How to Reply Appeal/Pre-Appeal Appeal Post Board Decision Judicial review of Decision either by Appeal to U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit Civil action in U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia 45

How to Reply Appeal/Pre-Appeal Practice Tips Anticipate Final Office Action Early Plan for response after Final Office Action during consideration of first Office Action Be cordial and respectful of Examiner Seize on indications of allowable or potentially allowable subject matter Structure claim matrix to facilitate allowance of claims after Final Clearly delineate claims that will most likely be allowable so questionable claims can be easily cancelled 46

How to Reply Appeal/Pre-Appeal Practice Tips (cont'd) Act Early After Receipt of Final Office Action Take advantage of expedited processing guidelines Plan on filing response (utilizing the AFCP 2.0 program, if appropriate) within two months of mailing date of Final Office Action Examiner will provide Advisory Action on expedited basis Could reduce extension fees Schedule Telephonic Interview with Examiner to occur well before lapse of two-month period to discuss possible allowable subject matter Monitor consideration of any After Final Amendment, to consider appropriate action (e.g., filing of a Request for Continued Examination (RCE), Notice of Appeal, or further Amendment) by the three-month due date 47

Thank you! Please contact me if you have any further questions. Email: smjensen@mintz.com 48