The Rules of Procedure for the opt-out

Similar documents
The Current Status of the Unitary Patent Package

Rules of Procedure ( Rules ) of the Unified Patent Court

The Unitary Patent and the Unified Patent Court EPLAW European Patent Lawyers Association Brussels 2 December 2011

Patent Protection: Europe

The German constitutional challenge

Uniform protection and rights conferred: towards a limited unitary effect?

The Unitary Patent & The Unified Patent Court IP Key & Centre for Commercial Law Studies, Queen Mary University of London 8 November 2016

Preliminary set of provisions for the Rules of Procedure ( Rules ) of the Unified Patent Court

The Current Status of the European Patent Package

Draft Rules relating to Unitary Patent Protection revised version of Rules 1 to 11 of SC/16/13

Unitary Patent Guide. Obtaining, maintaining and managing Unitary Patents

Unitary Patent Procedure before the EPO

PROPOSALS FOR CREATING UNITARY PATENT PROTECTION IN THE EUROPEAN UNION

This document is meant purely as a documentation tool and the institutions do not assume any liability for its contents

The Unified Patent Court explained in detail. Managing Intellectual Property European Patent Reform Forum 19 September 2013 Munich

UPC FUTURE OF PATENT LITIGATION IN EUROPE. Alexander Haertel

THE TRADE MARKS (AMENDMENT) BILL, 2009

L 172/4 EN Official Journal of the European Union

PATENT SYSTEM STATUS OFREFORMS

Patent litigation. Block 2. Module Jurisdiction and procedure Complementary reading: Unified Patent Court Agreement ( UPCA )

Unitary Patent in Europe & Unified Patent Court (UPC)

Patent litigation. Block 3. Module UPC Law Essentials

French case law on the consequences of the revocation of a patent on the payment of royalties by the licensee and of damages by the infringer

The EU Unitary Patent System in its current state. EU-Japan Policy Seminar 22 November 2016

FINLAND Patents Decree No. 669 of September 26, 1980 as last amended by Decree No. 580 of 18 July 2013 Enter into force on 1 September 2013

The Opt-Out: Actions You Need to Take

of Laws for Electronic Access ARIPO

(Acts whose publication is obligatory) COMMISSION REGULATION ( EC ) No 2868/95. of 13 December 1995

PATENT SYSTEM STATUS OF REFORMS

9107/15 TB/at 1 DG G 3 B

Preliminary set of provisions for the Rules of procedure of the Unified Patent Court

EUROPEAN PATENT OFFICE (EPO)

Order on Patents and Supplementary Protection Certificates

DENMARK Patents Regulations Order No. 25 of 18 January, 2013 ENTRY INTO FORCE: 1 February, 2013

Preparatory Committee for the Unified Patent Court. Rules on Court fees and recoverable costs. I. Proposal for

IP IN A POST-BREXIT EUROPE ENSURING YOUR EUROPEAN IP RIGHTS ARE PROTECTED DATE: 10 NOVEMBER 2016 PRESENTERS: CHRIS FINN, BEN GRAU AND GRAHAM MURNANE

AFRICAN REGIONAL INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY ORGANIZATION (ARIPO) REGULATIONS FOR IMPLEMENTING THE HARARE PROTOCOL

TURKEY Trademark Regulations as last amended on October 2, 2002

Part IV. IV.7. Republication of the international application in an EPO official language. Fees payable on entering the European regional phase

The European Patent and the UPC

The Rules of Procedure of the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Slovenia

13345/14 BB/ab 1 DG G3

EUROPEAN PATENT OFFICE (EPO)

GUIDELINES FOR EXAMINATION OF EUROPEAN UNION TRADE MARKS EUROPEAN UNION INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY OFFICE (EUIPO) PART E REGISTER OPERATIONS SECTION 2

REGULATION ON PROVIDING THE APPLICATION OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS. Article 1. Article 2

SWEDEN PATENTS ACT No.837 of 1967 in the version in force from July 1, 2014

EUROPEAN PATENT OFFICE (EPO)

The European Unitary Patent System

1. Inventions that are new, that involve an inventive step and that are susceptible of industrial application shall be patentable.

The Consolidate Patents Act

FINAL PROPOSAL OF THE ACT ON AMENDMENTS TO THE PATENT ACT

Failure to adhere to the above can result to the irrevocable lapsing of a patent application.

IRELAND Trade Marks Rules as amended up to and including the February 2, 2016

BANJUL PROTOCOL ON MARKS

Part IV. Fees payable on entering the European regional phase. Fees - general remarks

CHAPTER III APPLICATION FOR REGISTRATION OF INDUSTRIAL DESIGN

Chapter 419. Vacant. Chapter 420. Financial Institutions (Validation of Acts) Act. Chapter 422. Vacant. National Savings and Credit Act

Registration of UK Trade Marks Ordinance

Revision of the Rules of Procedure of the Boards of Appeal

ACCESSION KIT: THE MADRID SYSTEM FOR THE INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION OF MARKS

EUROPEAN UNION. Brussels, 12 December 2012 (OR. en) 2011/0093 (COD) PE-CONS 72/11 PI 180 CODEC 2344 OC 70

PART TWO APPLICATION, EXAMINATION, REGISTRATION AND RENEWAL

Substantive patent law harmonization: focus on grace period

Consolidated version of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice of 25 September Table of Contents

Unitary patent and Unified Patent Court: the proposed framework

UNIFIED PATENT SYSTEM: A NEW OPPORTUNITY FOR INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY IN EUROPE

AFRICAN REGIONAL INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY ORGANIZATION (ARIPO) BANJUL PROTOCOL ON MARKS

Implementing Regulations to the Convention on the Grant of European Patents

Supplement No. 2 published with Extraordinary Gazette No. 12 dated 3 February, THE PATENTS AND TRADE MARKS LAW, 2011 (LAW 30 OF 2011)

No. prev. doc.: 15819/13 PI 159 European Patent with Unitary Effect and Unified Patent Court - Information by the Presidency

PART I IMPLEMENTING REGULATIONS TO PART I OF THE CONVENTION

TRADE MARKS RULES, 1996 (as amended)

Order on the Examination and Other Processing of Utility Model Applications and Registered Utility Models

Revision of the Rules of Procedure of the Boards of Appeal. First public draft online user consultation. 1 February 2018

Health and Social Work Professions Order 2001

Layout-Designs of Integrated Circuits Protection Act

The Manual concerning proceedings before the Office for Harmonization in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION. Brussels, 27 September /12 PI 113 COUR 66 WORKING DOCUMENT

FINLAND Patents Act No. 550 of December 15, 1967 as last amended by Act No. 101/2013 of January 31, 2013 Enter into force on 1 September 2013

Europe-wide patent protection and the competence of the Unified Patent Court

Kingdom of Bhutan The Industrial Property Act enacted on July 13, 2001 entry into force: 2001 (Part III, Sections 17 to 23: May 1, 2009)

CZECH REPUBLIC Utility Model Act

COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION. Brussels, 19 March /08 PI 14

COMMISSION DELEGATED REGULATION (EU) /... of

Madrid Easy. A rough and easy guide how international registrations designating the European Community will be processed by the OHIM

Regulations to the Norwegian Patents Act (The Patent Regulations)

LOOSE TRANSLATION DUTCH ARTICLES ARE LEADING

TREATY SERIES 2007 Nº 7. Additional Protocol to the Convention on the Transfer of Sentenced Persons excluding Article 3

SOUTH AFRICA Trade Marks regulations Government Notice R578 of 21 April 1995 as amended by Government Notice R1180 of 1 December 2006

European Patent Law. Gwilym Roberts Daniel Brook

Plant Breeders Rights Act No. 15 of 1976*

LOOSE TRANSLATION DUTCH ARTICLES ARE LEADING

2. Law no. 5 of 1984 regarding Industry (State Gazette of 1964 no. 22, Supplementary State Gazette no. 3274);

FINLAND Utility Model Decree No of December 5, 1991 As amended by Decree No. 581 of July 18, Enter into force on September 1, 2013.

COMMON REGULATIONS UNDER THE MADRID AGREEMENT CONCERNING THE INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION OF MARKS AND THE PROTOCOL RELATING TO THAT AGREEMENT

Common Regulations under the Madrid Agreement Concerning the International Registration of Marks and the Protocol Relating to that Agreement

Draft agreement on a Unified Patent Court and draft Statute - Revised Presidency text

Working Group on the Development of the Lisbon System (Appellations of Origin)

COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES. Proposal for a COUNCIL DECISION

The Unitary Patent & Unified Patent Court

Transcription:

The Rules of Procedure Pierre Véron Honorary President, EPLAW (European Patent Lawyers Association) Member of the Drafting Committee of the UPC Rules of Procedure and of the Expert Group advising the UPC Preparatory Committee Paris Lyon Caveat This presentation is based on the 18 th draft of Rules of procedure of the Unified Patent Court released on 19 October 2015 It is very likely that certain changes will be brought with respect to the opt-out Check the final version of the Rules of procedure before making any real life optout 2 1

Article 83 UPC Agreement The opt-out (3) Unless an action has already been brought before the Court, a proprietor of or an applicant for a European patent granted or applied for prior to the end of the transitional period under paragraph 1 and, where applicable, paragraph 5, as well as a holder of a supplementary protection certificate issued for a product protected by a European patent, shall have the possibility to opt out from the exclusive competence of the Court. To this end they shall notify their opt-out to the Registry by the latest one month before expiry of the transitional period. The opt-out shall take effect upon its entry into the register. (4) Unless an action has already been brought before a national court, proprietors of or applicants for European patents or holders of supplementary protection certificates issued for a product protected by a European patent who made use of the opt-out in accordance with paragraph 3 shall be entitled to withdraw their opt-out at any moment. In this event they shall notify the Registry accordingly. The withdrawal of the opt-out shall take effect upon its entry into the register. 3 Rule 5 of the Rules of procedure 3pages (10 pages DE/EN/FR) 96 lines 1289 words 6503 characters 4 2

Rule 5 of the Rules of procedure Einreichung eines Antrags auf Inanspruchnahme der Ausnahmeregelung und Rücktritt von der Inanspruchnahme der Ausnahmeregelung Lodging of an Application to opt out and withdrawal of an opt out Dépôt d une déclaration de dérogation et retrait d une déclaration de dérogation 5 UPC-ish spoken To opt out (but the opt-out ) To withdraw the opt-out To opt in : to stay in To be locked in To be locked out 6 3

Overview Legal sources When (sunrise, sunset)? How? Fee Who (representative)? Who (proprietor)? What (content)? For where (territory)? So what (effect)? SPCs Withdrawal Only one round Lock in Lock out 7 Legal sources subject to legal scrubbing! 17 December 2012 Regulation 1257/2012 enhanced cooperation creation of unitary patent protection 17 December 2012 Regulation 1260/2012 (translation arrangements) 19 February 2013 Agreement on a Unified Patent Court and draft Statute 19 October 2015 Draft Rules of procedure Unified Patent Court (V18) http://www.upc.documents.eu.com/pdfs/ 2015-10-19_Agreement_UPC_DE-EN- FR_and_Rules_Procedure_UPC_DE-EN- FR_Draft_18.pdf 8 4

The main publicly available documents can be found on www.upc.documents.eu.com 9 UPC s FAQ https://www.unified-patent-court.org/faq/opt-out 10 5

For what? European patent (even expired) European patent application SPC based on a European patent not a European patent with unitary effect rule 5 (10) provides that if an opt-out has been made or a patent application which matures in a unitary patent, this opt-out is deemed to be withdrawn 11 When: sunrise Rule 5: 13. Applications accepted by the Registry before the entry into force of the Agreement shall be treated as entered on the register on the date of entry into force of the Agreement. 12 6

When: sunset Even after the patent s expiry: Rule 5: 1. The proprietor of a European patent (including a European patent that has expired) Before the end of the 7-year transitional period: Art. 83 UPCA: To this end they shall notify their opt-out to the Registry by the latest one month before expiry of the transitional period Except in case of lock-in (see below) 13 Until when? For the life of the patent Opt-out s effect lasts also after the end of transitional period: It was the legislator's objective when providing for the possibility to opt-out, to give the patent holder the possibility to remove his European patent from the jurisdiction of the UPC for the whole life of that patent. This follows clearly from the fact that an opt-out can be notified until the very last day of the transitional period. The latter would make no sense and would not have been foreseen if the effect of an opt-out was to expire on the last day of the transitional period. https://www.unified-patent-court.org/faq/opt-out 14 7

How? Rule 5: 1. The proprietor of a European patent (including a European patent that has expired) or the applicant for a published application for a European patent (hereinafter in this Rule 5 an application ) who wishes to opt out that patent or application from the exclusive competence of the Court in accordance with Article 83(3) of the Agreement shall lodge an Application (hereinafter in this Rule 5 an Application to opt out ) with the Registry. The Application can only be lodged in an electronic form 15 Fee Rule 5: 5. The applicant for an opt-out shall pay the fixed fee in accordance with Part 6. The Application to opt out shall not be entered in the register until the fixed fee has been paid. One fixed fee shall be payable in respect of each European patent or application for which an Application to opt out has been filed, including any supplementary protection certificate based on said patent or application. FREE! Decision Prep Com 25/02/2016 16 8

Who (representative)? Rule 5: 4. Rule 8 shall not apply to Applications to opt out and to Applications to withdraw made pursuant to this Rule 5. Where a representative is appointed, such a representative may include professional representatives and legal practitioners as defined in Article 134 EPC in addition to those referred to in Article 48 of the Agreement. Rule 8 Party and party's representative 1. A party shall be represented in accordance with Article 48 of the Agreement unless otherwise provided by these Rules [Rules 5, 88.4 and 378.5]. ARTICLE 48 UPCA Representation (1) Parties shall be represented by lawyers authorised to practise before a court of a Contracting Member State. (2) Parties may alternatively be represented by European Patent Attorneys who are entitled to act as professional representatives before the European Patent Office pursuant to Article 134 of the EPC and who have appropriate qualifications such as a European Patent Litigation Certificate. 17 Article 134 EPC Representation before the European Patent Office (1) Representation of natural or legal persons in proceedings established by this Convention may only be undertaken by professional representatives whose names appear on a list maintained for this purpose by the European Patent Office. (2) Any natural person who (a) is a national of a Contracting State, (b) has his place of business or employment in a Contracting State and (c) has passed the European qualifying examination may be entered on the list of professional representatives. (3) During a period of one year from the date on which the accession of a State to this Convention takes effect, entry on that list may also be requested by any natural person who (a) is a national of a Contracting State, (b) has his place of business or employment in the State having acceded to the Convention and (c) is entitled to represent natural or legal persons in patent matters before the central industrial property office of that State. Where such entitlement is not conditional upon the requirement of special professional qualifications, the person shall have regularly so acted in that State for at least five years. (4) Entry shall be effected upon request, accompanied by certificates indicating that the conditions laid down in paragraph 2 or 3 are fulfilled. (5) Persons whose names appear on the list of professional representatives shall be entitled to act in all proceedings established by this Convention. (6) For the purpose of acting as a professional representative, any person whose name appears on the list of professional representatives shall be entitled to establish a place of business in any Contracting State in which proceedings established by this Convention may be conducted, having regard to the Protocol on Centralisation annexed to this Convention. The authorities of such State may remove that entitlement in individual cases only in application of legal provisions adopted for the purpose of protecting public security and law and order. Before such action is taken, the President of the European Patent Office shall be consulted. (7) The President of the European Patent Office may grant exemption from: (a)the requirement of paragraphs 2(a) or paragraphs 3(a) in special circumstances; (b) the requirement of paragraph 3(c), second sentence, if the applicant furnishes proof that he has acquired the requisite qualification in another way. (8) Representation in proceedings established by this Convention may also be undertaken, in the same way as by a professional representative, by any legal practitioner qualified in a Contracting State and having his place of business in that State, to the extent that he is entitled in that State to act as a professional representative in patent matters. Paragraph 6 shall apply mutatis mutandis. 18 9

Who (proprietor)? Rule 5: 1. The proprietor of a European patent (including a European patent that has expired) or the applicant for a published application for a European patent (hereinafter in this Rule 5 an application ) who wishes to opt out that patent or application from the exclusive competence of the Court in accordance with Article 83(3) of the Agreement shall lodge an Application (hereinafter in this Rule 5 an Application to opt out ) with the Registry. The licensee cannot opt out (think of this in your license agreements) 19 Who (co-ownership)? Rule 5 (1): (a) Where the patent or application is owned by two or more proprietors or applicants, all proprietors or applicants shall lodge the Application to opt out. 20 10

Who (registration in patent registers)? Rule 5 (1): (a) Where the person lodging an Application to opt out is not recorded as the proprietor or applicant in the registers referred to in Rule 8.5(a) and (b), respectively, the person shall lodge a declaration pursuant to paragraph 3(e). Rule 8: 5. Subject to paragraph 6, for the purposes of proceedings under these Rules: (a) in relation to the proprietor of a European patent, the person entitled to be registered as proprietor under the law of each Contracting Member State in which such European patent has been validated shall be treated as the proprietor whether or not such person is in fact recorded in the register of patents maintained in such Contracting Member State (hereinafter national patent register ); and (b) in relation to the applicant for a European patent, the person entitled to be registered as applicant whether or not such person is in fact recorded as such in the European Patent Register kept by the European Patent Office. 21 What (content)? Rule 5: 3. The Application to opt out shall contain: (a) the name of the proprietor or applicant [ ], and all relevant postal and, where applicable, electronic addresses; (b) where such proprietor, applicant or holder have appointed a representative, the name and postal address and electronic address for service of the representative; (c) details of the patent and/or application including the number; (d) details of any supplementary protection certificate granted based on the patent concerned, including the number; and (e) for the purposes of paragraph 1(a), a Declaration of proprietorship that the person lodging the Application to opt out is the proprietor or applicant pursuant to Rule 8.5 and entitled to lodge the Application to opt out. 22 11

For where (territory) Rule 5 (1): (b) The Application to opt out shall be made in respect of all of the Contracting Member States for which the European patent has been granted or which have been designated in the application. What about the Member States which will ratify only after the entry into force of the Agreement? 23 So what (date of effect)? Rule 5: 6. Subject to paragraph 5 the Registrar shall as soon as practicable enter the Application to opt out in the register. Subject to paragraph 7, the opt-out which meets the requirements laid down in this Rule shall be regarded as effective from the date of entry in the register. If the requirements are missing or incorrectly recorded, a correction may be lodged with the Registry. The date of entry of the correction shall be noted in the register. The opt-out shall be effective from the date of correction. 24 12

Supplementary protection certificates (SPC) are linked with the patent Rule 5: 2. An Application to opt out or an Application to withdraw an opt-out pursuant to paragraph 8 (hereinafter in this Rule 5 an Application to withdraw ) shall extend to any supplementary protection certificate based on the European patent. (a) Where any such supplementary protection certificate has been granted at the date of lodging the Application to opt out or the Application to withdraw, the holder of the supplementary protection certificate shall, if different from the proprietor of the patent, lodge the Application to opt out or the Application to withdraw together with the proprietor. (b) Where any such supplementary protection certificate is granted subsequent to lodging the Application to opt out, the opt-out shall take effect automatically on grant of said supplementary protection certificate. 25 Withdrawal of the opt-out Rule 5: 8. A proprietor of a patent or an application the subject of an opt-out pursuant to this Rule may lodge an Application to withdraw in respect of the patent or application, but not in respect of different Contracting Member States for which the European patent has been granted or which have been designated in the application. The Application to withdraw shall contain the particulars in accordance with paragraph 3 and shall be accompanied by the fixed fee in accordance with Part 6; paragraph 5 shall apply mutatis mutandis. Subject to the receipt of the fixed fee the Registrar shall as soon as practicable enter the Application to withdraw in the register and the withdrawal shall be regarded as effective from the date of entry in the register. Paragraphs 1(a) and 6 shall apply mutatis mutandis. Except in case of lock-in (see below) 26 13

Only one round Art 5: 11. A patent or application the subject of an Application to withdraw which has been entered on the register may not thereafter be the subject of a further Application to opt out. 27 Lock-in Article 83 (3) UPC Agreement: Unless an action has already been brought before the Court, a proprietor of or an applicant for a European patent [ ] shall have the possibility to opt out from the exclusive competence of the Court. To this end they shall notify their optout to the Registry by the latest one month before expiry of the transitional period. The opt-out shall take effect upon its entry into the register. Rule 5: 7. In the event that an action has been commenced before the Court in respect of a patent and/or an application contained in an Application to opt out prior to the date of entry of the Application to opt out in the register or prior to the date of correction pursuant to paragraph 6, the Application to opt out shall be ineffective in respect of the patent and/or application in question, irrespective of whether the action is pending or has been concluded. 28 14

Lock-out Article 83 (4) UPC Agreement: Unless an action has already been brought before a national court, proprietors of or applicants for European patents or holders of supplementary protection certificates issued for a product protected by a European patent who made use of the opt-out in accordance with paragraph 3 shall be entitled to withdraw their opt-out at any moment. In this event they shall notify the Registry accordingly. The withdrawal of the opt-out shall take effect upon its entry into the register. Rule 5: 7. In the event that an action has been commenced before the Court in respect of a patent and/or an application contained in an Application to opt out prior to the date of entry of the Application to opt out in the register or prior to the date of correction pursuant to paragraph 6, the Application to opt out shall be ineffective in respect of the patent and/or application in question, irrespective of whether the action is pending or has been concluded. 29 Pierre Véron Thank you 1, rue Volney 75002 Paris Tel. +33 (0)1 47 03 62 62 Fax +33 (0)1 47 03 62 69 3, cours Charlemagne 69002 Lyon Tel. +33 (0)4 72 69 39 39 Fax +33 (0)4 72 69 39 49 pierre.veron@veron.com www.veron.com 15

To stay in or to opt out? that is the question. 31 16