FIDUCIARY LITIGATION: DAMAGES

Similar documents
36C Attorneys' fees and costs. NC General Statutes - Chapter 36C Article 10 1

BY-LAWS WALNUT HILL OF ABINGTON COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION, A PENNSYLVANIA NON-PROFIT CORPORATION ARTICLE I APPLICABILITY; RULES OF INTERPRETATION

(8) (a) (I) (II) (b) (9) History. Added by 2014 Ch. 296, 10, eff. 8/6/2014.

Present: Hassell, C.J., Keenan, Koontz, Kinser, Lemons, and Agee, JJ., and Compton, S.J.

BY-LAWS OF USA RUGBY CHARITABLE FOUNDATION A PENNSYLVANIA NONPROFIT CORPORATION. Updated: August 23, 2012

NC General Statutes - Chapter 32C Article 1 1

Tort Reform (2) The pleading specifically asserts that the medical care has and all medical records

JULY 2003 LAW REVIEW COACH BREAKS PLAYER S ARM DEMONSTRATING TECHNIQUE. James C. Kozlowski, J.D., Ph.D James C. Kozlowski

PLAINTIFF DEMANDS A TRIAL BY JURY IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR THE CITY OF ARCADIA

Case 2:10-cv RLH -GWF Document 127 Filed 06/29/11 Page 1 of 10

FILED: KINGS COUNTY CLERK 02/04/2014 INDEX NO /2013 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 15 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 02/04/2014

Case 2:18-cv JLL-JAD Document 1 Filed 12/14/18 Page 1 of 12 PageID: 1

Understanding Legal Terminology in NFA Arbitration Cases

TORT LAW. By Helen Jordan, Elaine Martinez, and Jim Ponce

Accountants Liability. An accountant may be liable under common law due to negligence or fraud.

STATE OF OHIO ) IN THE COURT OF APPEALS NINTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COUNTY OF MEDINA ) DECISION AND JOURNAL ENTRY INTRODUCTION

Matter of Mankin 2010 NY Slip Op 31745(U) May 26, 2010 Sur Ct, Nassau County Docket Number: Judge: John B. Riordan Republished from New York

STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA TRANSPORTATION COMPENDIUM OF LAW

ANSWER TO COUNTERCLAIM BUSINESS DISPUTE

BYLAWS PITTSBURGH ALLDERDICE HIGH SCHOOL PTO. A Pennsylvania Nonprofit Corporation

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida, January Term, A.D. 2012

LEDER &HALE. District of Columbia Civil Liability Law Summary. Steve Leder 11/2017

ROANOKE VALLEY BROADBAND AUTHORITY Adoption of Bylaws

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 12/28/2011 INDEX NO /2011 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 4 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 12/28/2011

LIABILITY IN RESPECT OF OFFERING OF INTERESTS IN A CAYMAN ISLANDS EXEMPTED LIMITED PARTNERSHIP

NO CV IN THE COURT OF APPEALS TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT TYLER, TEXAS

Case 1:17-cv WHP Document 1 Filed 10/05/17 Page 1 of 21

OPEN DESIGN ALLIANCE EVALUATION LICENSE AGREEMENT

6.1 Jones Act - Unseaworthiness General Instruction (Comparative Negligence Defense) The Plaintiff seeks to recover under a federal statute known as

In their initial and amended complaints, the plaintiffs, who are beneficiaries of

TYPES OF MONETARY DAMAGES

Duties of Care and Skill. (a common law and statutory duty) Duties of care & skill. Duties of care & skill

Fundamentals of Drafting Executive Employment Agreements

BYLAWS OF THE CHRISTIAN SCIENTIFIC SOCIETY, INC. ARTICLE I OFFICES AND FISCAL YEAR

A BILL. i n t i t u l e d. An Act to amend the Labuan Offshore Trusts Act 1996.

BYLAWS AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES FOUNDATION OF PENNSYLVANIA, INC. ARTICLE I THE ORGANIZATION

Polluter Pays Doctrine Underscored: Section 99(2) of the EPA Applied: Some Thoughts on Midwest Properties Ltd. v. Thordarson, 2015 ONCA 819

Present: Kinser, C.J., Lemons, Goodwyn, Millette, and Mims, JJ., and Koontz, S.J.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ROME DIVISION

American Tort Reform Association 1101 Connecticut Avenue, NW Suite 400 Washington, DC (202) Fax: (202)

Case 4:12-cv Document 1 Filed in TXSD on 07/10/12 Page 1 of 16 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION

COMPLAINT AND JURY DEMAND. Plaintiffs Furlandare Singleton, individually, and as Administrator of the Estate of

BYLAWS. KUTZTOWN ROTARY CHARITABLE FOUNDATION, INC. (a Pennsylvania nonprofit corporation) ARTICLE I PURPOSE

BEFORE THE OREGON PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION

Case 3:17-cv DJH Document 3 Filed 02/06/17 Page 1 of 10 PageID #: 13

CED: An Overview of the Law

STATE OF KANSAS TRANSPORTATION COMPENDIUM OF LAW

Question 1: I read that a mentally impaired adult s contracts may be void or voidable. Which is it?

Case KJC Doc 317 Filed 08/29/16 Page 1 of 8 IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

2008 S.H. No. B E T W E E N: IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NOVA SCOTIA BARRETT THOMPSON - and - Plaintiff CADBURY ADAMS CANADA INC., MARS, INCORPORATED, MAR

TORTIOUS BAD FAITH CLAIMS AGAINST SURETIES - NOT IN NEVADA. Great American Insurance Company v. General Builders, Inc.

Monica Vickery sought review of the court of appeals. damages in her defamation suit against the mother and sister of

HYDERALLY & ASSOCIATES, P.C.

No. U Ml An WILLODEAN P. PRECISE, COMPLAINT UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE WESTERN DIVISION.

COMPLAINT DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL

UNITED WOMEN S HOCKEY LEAGUE INC. A Delaware Nonprofit Nonstock Corporation. Bylaws ARTICLE I PURPOSES

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

TURKS AND CAICOS ISLANDS TRUSTS BILL 2015 ARRANGEMENT OF CLAUSES

Intentional Torts. What Is a Tort? Tort Recovery

THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE. Lincoln & Carol Hanscom. Linda O Connell. No. 03-C-338 ORDER

CHAPTER Committee Substitute for Committee Substitute for House Bill No. 1363

GAIL STEPP, ET AL. OPINION BY v. Record No JUSTICE LAWRENCE L. KOONTZ, JR. January 14, 2000 JAMES A. FOSTER, ET AL.

Truck Accident Litigation in the SML Footprint:

Courthouse News Service

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF CASS COUNTY, MISSOURI AT HARRISONVILLE

Page F.Supp. 842 (Cite as: 944 F.Supp. 842) United States District Court, D. Kansas.

PENNSYLVANIA STATE CONSTABLES ASSOCIATION, INC. BYLAWS

WikiLeaks Document Release

FILED. Attorneys for Plaintiffs SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON FOR KING COUNTY

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE IN AND FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY

MARYLAND FALSE CLAIMS ACT. SECTION 1. BE IT ENACTED BY THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF MARYLAND, That the Laws of Maryland read as follows:

Contract and Tort Law for Engineers

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA CHARLESTON DIVISION

Case LSS Doc 90 Filed 06/22/17 Page 1 of 6 IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE : : : : : : : : Chapter 11

STATE OF MISSISSIPPI TRANSPORTATION COMPENDIUM OF LAW

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIRST CIRCUIT STATE OF HAWAII ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) COMPLAINT

Case 4:14-cv RAS Document 1 Filed 09/23/14 Page 1 of 11 PageID #: 1

STOECKEL, JAMES MOORE, JIMMY D. COMPLAINT AND JURY DEMAND

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION

Attorneys for Plaintiff ABIGAIL SMITH SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF GRANITE

STATE OF OHIO ) IN THE COURT OF APPEALS NINTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COUNTY OF LORAIN ) DECISION AND JOURNAL ENTRY

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY NORTHERN DIVISION AT COVINGTON. AT&T MOBILITY, LLC, et al. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Case 5:12-cv FPS-JES Document 117 Filed 05/15/14 Page 1 of 12 PageID #: 1973

MATERIALS TRANSFER AND EVALUATION LICENSE AGREEMENT. Carnegie Mellon University

CAUSE NUMBER DC H. DEBORAH BROCK AND IN THE DISTRICT COURT CHRIS BROCK Plaintiffs

AMENDED AND RESTATED BYLAWS. Bicycle Coalition of Greater Philadelphia. A Pennsylvania Nonprofit Corporation

Plaintiff, Deborah Fellner, by and through her counsel, Eichen Levinson & Crutchlow, LLP, hereby makes this claim against the Defendant as follows:

FINANCIAL PLANNING AGREEMENT

For Preview Only - Please Do Not Copy

FILED: RICHMOND COUNTY CLERK 03/17/ :14 AM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/17/2016

THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF PENNSYLVANIA SENATE BILL INTRODUCED BY GREENLEAF, ALLOWAY, SCHWANK, FONTANA, MENSCH AND HUGHES, MARCH 6, 2013

3/12/14. TERMS AND CONDITIONS TO SUPPLY and SALES AGREEMENTS

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 01/11/ :00 PM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 40 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 01/11/2017 EXHIBIT 1

Case 3:10-cv MLC -DEA Document 10 Filed 06/24/10 Page 1 of 8 PageID: 112

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF IDAHO. Docket No ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

ARTICLE I. The Seal of the Authority shall contain the name of the Authority and be in the form of a circle.

State Laws Chart I: Liability Reforms

Claims for Misfeasance in Public Office: A Brief Summary

REPEALED LIMITATION ACT CHAPTER 266

Wrongful Death and Survival Action Preliminary Objections Punitive Damages IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF YORK COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA CIVIL DIVISION

Transcription:

FIDUCIARY LITIGATION: DAMAGES Robert H. Burger, Esq. Williams Mullen 222 Central Park Avenue, Suite 1700 Virginia Beach, Virginia 23462 757.499.8800 757.473.0395 facsimile rburger@williamsmullen.com

FIDUCIARY LITIGATION: DAMAGES I. Compensatory Damages A. Equity will not hold fiduciaries liable for losses incurred in managing a trust where they acted in good faith, in the exercise of reasonable discretion, and as they would probably have done in their own matters. See 19 M.J. Trusts and Trustees 105. 1. Good faith is a defense only where a trustee, acting within the limits of his powers, with proper prudence and diligence, commits mere mistakes or errors of judgment. Therefore, good faith is no defense where a trustee has arbitrarily overstepped the bounds of his authority, or has handled his trust affairs in such a manner as to be unable to render a proper accounting. Id. 2. The inquiry in every case in which it is sought to fix a liability upon a fiduciary is: a) Did he act within the scope of his powers and duties? b) Did he act in good faith? c) Did he act with ordinary prudence? If he did so act, he is not responsible for the consequences of the act, thought it result in the loss of the trust fund, or some part of it. See Powers v. Powers, 174 Va. 164 (1939). 3. A trustee who acts in reasonable reliance on the terms of the trust as expressed in the trust instrument is not liable to a beneficiary for a breach 2

of trust to the extent the breach resulted from the reliance. (Virginia Code Ann. 55-550.06) B. Damages for Breach of Trust * (Virginia Code Ann. 55-550.02) 1. A trustee who commits a breach of trust is liable to the beneficiaries affected for the greater of: a) The amount required to restore the value of the trust property and trust distributions to what they would have been had the breach not occurred; or b) The profit the trustee made by reason of the breach. 2. Contribution from Other Trustee(s) a) If more than one trustee is liable to the beneficiaries for a breach of trust, a trustee is entitled to contribution from the other trustee or trustees. b) A trustee is not entitled to contribution if the trustee was substantially more at fault than another trustee or if the trustee committed the breach of trust in bad faith or with reckless indifference to the purposes of the trust or the interests of the beneficiaries. c) A trustee who received a benefit from the breach of trust is not entitled to contribution from another trustee to the extent of the benefit received. C. Damages in Absence of Breach (Virginia Code Ann. 55-550.03) * A violation by a trustee of a duty the trustee owes to a beneficiary is a breach of trust. (Virginia Code Ann. 55-550.01(A)) 3

1. A trustee is accountable to an affected beneficiary for any profit made by the trustee arising from the administration of the trust, even absent a breach of trust. 2. Absent a breach of trust, a trustee is not liable to a beneficiary for a loss or depreciation in the value of trust property or not having made a profit. II. Punitive Damages A. Punitive damages are allowable only where there is misconduct or actual malice, or such reckless or negligence as to evidence a conscious disregard of the rights of others. Punitive damages are not favored in Virginia because they are meant to punish, rather than compensate, and should be awarded only in cases of the most egregious conduct. See Xspedius Management Co. of Va. v. Stephan, 269 Va. 421 (2005). 1. In Virginia, punitive damages are capped at $350,000.00. (Virginia Code Ann. 8.01-38.1) B. Under the law of trusts, trustees generally are not liable for punitive damages for breach of fiduciary duty. See Donnkenny, Inc. v. Virginia Financial and Ins. Services, Inc., 739 F.Supp. 290 (W.D. Va. 1990). 1. Virginia law has been found to allow an award of punitive damages in a breach of trust claim only when the breach was particularly egregious or involved some kind of separate tortious conduct. See 19 M.J. Trusts and 4

Trustees 111; Kline v. NationsBank of Virginia, 886 F.Supp. 1285 (E.D. Va. 1995). III. Limitation on Personal Liability of a Trustee (Virginia Code Ann. 55-550.10) A. Except as otherwise provided in the contract, a trustee is not personally liable on a contract properly entered into in the trustee s fiduciary capacity in the course of administering the trust if the trustee in the contract disclosed the fiduciary capacity. B. A trustee is personally liable for torts committed in the course of administering a trust, or for obligations arising from ownership or control of trust property, including liability of violation of environmental law, only if the trustee is personally at fault. C. A claim based on a contract entered into by a trustee in the trustee s fiduciary capacity, on an obligation arising from ownership or control of trust property, or on a tort committed in the course of administering a trust, may be asserted in a judicial proceeding against the trustee in the trustee s fiduciary capacity, whether or not the trustee is personally liable for the claim. IV. Attorneys Fees and Costs A. In a judicial proceeding involving the administration of a trust, the court, as justice and equity may require, may award costs and expenses, including 5

reasonable attorneys fees, to any party, to be paid by another party or from the trust that is the subject of the controversy. (Virginia Code Ann. 55-550.04) B. Procedure (Rule 3:25 of the Rules of the Supreme Court of Virginia) 1. A party seeking to recover attorneys fees shall include a demand therefore in the complaint, counterclaim, cross-claim, third-party pleading, or in a responsive pleading. a) The demand must identify the basis on which the party relies in requesting attorneys fees. 2. The failure of a party to file a demand as required constitutes a waiver by the party of the claim for attorneys fees, unless leave to file an amended pleading seeking attorneys fees is granted. 16747137_1.DOC 6