STATE OF MICHIGAN IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR THE COUNTY OF WAYNE. vs.

Similar documents
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

2:15-cv MAG-RSW Doc # 1 Filed 04/01/15 Pg 1 of 9 Pg ID 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

Case 2:10-cv GCS -VMM Document 1 Filed 12/14/10 Page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

Case 2:17-cv GJQ-TPG ECF No. 1 filed 01/25/17 PageID.1 Page 1 of 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN NORTHERN DIVISION

Case 1:13-cv RJJ Doc #1 Filed 12/27/13 Page 1 of 7 Page ID#1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

STATE OF MICHIGAN IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR THE COUNTY OF OAKLAND

E-FILED 2017 MAY 11 3:00 PM DELAWARE - CLERK OF DISTRICT COURT

FILED: BRONX COUNTY CLERK 01/26/ :43 AM INDEX NO /2018E NYSCEF DOC. NO. 2 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 01/26/2018

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF MADISON COUNTY, ALABAMA

Courthouse News Service

STATE OF MICHIGAN IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR THE COUNTY OF WAYNE

CAUSE NO. JANE DOE, Individually and as IN THE DISTRICT COURT Next Friend of JOHN DOE, a Minor Child, Plaintiffs,

STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS TENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT COUNTY OF OCONEE C.A. NO.: 2017-CP-10- Jane Doe, Plaintiff,

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT! WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN! SOUTHERN DIVISION!

Case 9:15-cv DMM Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/23/2015 Page 1 of 16 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

2:18-cv TLL-PTM Doc # 1 Filed 03/12/18 Pg 1 of 13 Pg ID 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

Plaintiffs, Defendants. COMPLAINT. necessary medical care for serious medical needs by the defendants during her commitment to the

STATE OF MICHIGAN IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR THE COUNTY OF WAYNE

Case 3:18-cv Document 1 Filed 09/19/18 Page 1 of 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE EIGHTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT DUPAGE COUNTY, ILLINOIS - LAW DIVISION. v. No.: COMPLAINT AT LAW

/ Court: 055

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA FOR SANTA CRUZ COUNTY

Case 1:11-cv JBS-AMD Document 37 Filed 06/27/12 Page 1 of 16 PageID: 223 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES WITH JURY DEMAND

11/9/2017 9:48 AM 17CV48960 IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE STATE OF OREGON FOR THE COUNTY OF DESCHUTES. Case No.

2:15-cv BAF-DRG Doc # 1 Filed 06/10/15 Pg 1 of 18 Pg ID 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

JURISDICTIONAL BASIS AND VENUE

Plaintiff, for its Complaint against the above-captioned Defendants, states and

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

2:13-cv BAF-MKM Doc # 1 Filed 06/24/13 Pg 1 of 14 Pg ID 1

Case 2:16-at Document 1 Filed 08/04/16 Page 1 of 9

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF GILES COUNTY, TENNESSEE

CAUSE NO. v. FALLS COUNTY, TEXAS I. DISCOVERY CONTROL PLAN LEVEL

IN THE STATE COURT OF GWINNETT COUNTY STATE OF GEORGIA

Case 1:17-cv JCB Document 5 Filed 02/15/17 Page 1 of 16 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS CIVIL ACTION NO.

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE TWELFTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA, IN AND FOR MANATEE COUNTY CIRCUIT CIVIL DIVISION

2:16-cv GCS-MKM Doc # 1 Filed 04/26/16 Pg 1 of 13 Pg ID 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT IN THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

Filing # E-Filed 12/22/ :53:20 PM

Case3:05-cv WHA Document1 Filed02/14/05 Page1 of 5

YOU ARE HEREBY SUMMONED and required to Answer the Complaint, a copy of

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 11/29/ :47 PM INDEX NO /2015 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 52 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 11/29/2017

STATE OF MICHIGAN IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR THE COUNTY OF WAYNE

STATE OF MICHIGAN IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR THE COUNTY OF WAYNE. Hon. Leslie Kim Smith

to redress his civil and legal rights, and alleges as follows: 1. Plaintiff, Anthony Truchan, is a resident of Nutley, New Jersey.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA BRUNSWICK DIVISION

Case: 1:13-cv HJW Doc #: 1 Filed: 03/28/13 Page: 1 of 9 PAGEID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 10/20/ :37 PM INDEX NO /2014 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 10/20/2014

COMPLAINT AND JURY DEMAND. Plaintiffs Furlandare Singleton, individually, and as Administrator of the Estate of

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION. Plaintiffs, No. 10-cv Hon. Paul D. Borman

3:17-cv MGL Date Filed 06/29/18 Entry Number 55 Page 1 of 8

DC PLAINTIFFS' ORIGINAL PETITION COME NOW, PLAINTIFFS DEE VOIGT, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS

INDEX NO /2017 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 65 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 07/06/2018

4:15-cv TGB-EAS Doc # 1 Filed 05/29/15 Pg 1 of 9 Pg ID 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

EFiled: Jan :11AM EST Transaction ID Case No. S19C ESB IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

Attorney for Plaintiffs A.C. a minor and C.C. a minor

CV CMCO 01/06/ :18:35 PM OLDFIELD, JOY M Page 1 of 8 IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS SUMMIT COUNTY, OHIO CASE NO.:

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 03/20/2013 INDEX NO /2013 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/20/2013

Case 2:13-cv MLCF-JCW Document 1 Filed 08/14/13 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA COMPLAINT

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE STATE OF OREGON FOR THE COUNTY OF MULTNOMAH. Case No. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

CAUSE NO. MALCOMB THOMAS, KORRIE HICKS, IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF LA TASHA MORRIS, & ROSHUNDA JOHNSON, PLAINTIFFS VS. HARRISON COUNTY, TEXAS

led FEB SUPERIOR COURl l.h '-.. irornia BY DEPUTY 1. GENERAL NEGLIGENCE 2. WILLFUL MISCONDUCT 3. WRONGFUL DEATH 4.

For Preview Only - Please Do Not Copy

Case 2:10-cv HGB-ALC Document 1 Filed 04/20/10 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA JANET DELUCA CIVIL ACTION

Summons SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF WAYNE X

Case 3:18-cv JSC Document 1 Filed 05/02/18 Page 1 of 11

INDEX NO. UNASSIGNED NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/13/2018

Case 3:08-cv DAK Document 31 Filed 02/25/2009 Page 1 of 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION

PLAINTIFF S ORIGINAL PETITION

Case 2:14-cv Document 1 Filed 04/29/14 Page 1 of 21 PageID #: 1

Case 3:16-cv KI Document 1 Filed 11/14/16 Page 1 of 8

IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF MERCER COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA CIVIL DIVISION

CAUSE NO. V. JUDICIAL DISTRICT DEFENDANTS. TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS PLAINTIFFS ORIGINAL PETITION NOW COMES SHERRY REYNOLDS, BRANDON REYNOLDS, KATY

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

Case 5:17-cv Document 2 Filed in TXSD on 01/17/17 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS LAREDO DIVISION

D-1-GN CAUSE NO. _ ORIGINAL PETITION AND REQUEST FOR DISCLOSURE

Case 3:16-cv Document 1 Filed 02/22/16 Page 1 of 6 Page ID #1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF HAWAI`I ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) COMPLAINT. Introduction

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF BUTTE UNLIMITED JURISDICTION

: No. 01 CV 1162 Plaintiff, : : Judge Alvin K. Hellerstein v. : UNITED AIR LINES, INC., a corporation : COMPLAINT. Defendant.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SHERMAN DIVISION

) ) ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) SUMMONS vs ) ) ) ) ) Defendants. )

Case: 4:17-cv Doc. #: 1 Filed: 07/19/17 Page: 1 of 14 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI

COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS COMPLAINT PARTIES. 1. Plaintiffs JOHN DOE No. 70 ("JOHN No. 70"), and JOHN DOE No. 71 ("JOHN No.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA. Civil File:

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION

Plaintiffs, by their attorney, NORA CONSTANCE MARINO, ESQ. complaining of the defendants herein, respectfully show this Court, and allege

STATE OF MICHIGAN CIRCUIT COURT FOR THE COUNTY OF MIDLAND

Case 2:18-cv Document 1 Filed 01/24/18 Page 1 of 10 Page ID #:1. Deadline UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

PLAINTIFF DEMANDS A TRIAL BY JURY IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR THE CITY OF ARCADIA

STATE OF MICHIGAN IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR THE COUNTY OF WAYNE. Plaintiffs, Case No. 17- NO. v. Honorable

Case 1:17-cv JCB Document 1 Filed 02/13/17 Page 1 of 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE ELEVENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR MIAMI-DADE COUNTY, FL0RIDA

Case 2:17-cv Document 1 Filed in TXSD on 12/12/17 Page 1 of 10

3:17-cv MGL Date Filed 08/29/18 Entry Number 88 Page 1 of 10

CASE NO. C O M P L A I N T. Attorney, and sues the Defendants, JUSTIN BIEBER ( BIEBER } and HUGO HESNY

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR AUTAUGA COUNTY, ALABAMA

CAUSE NO. JANE DOE IN THE DISTRICT COURT Plaintiff, JUDICIAL DISTRICT v.

SUMMONS IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA ) ) ) CIVIL ACTION 2017-CP-42- COUNTY OF SPARTANBURG

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA MIAMI DIVISION CASE NO. COMPLAINT AND DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL

Transcription:

STATE OF MICHIGAN IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR THE COUNTY OF WAYNE HOWARD LINDEN, as Personal Representative for the Estate of I NAYAH WRIGHT TRUSSEL, and JANEE WRIGHT-TRUSSEL, Individually, vs. Plaintiffs, Case No. 15- NO HON. 15-009487-NO CITY OF DETROIT, DETROIT FIRE DEPARTMENT and ANN MARIE THOMAS, Defendants. / GEOFFREY N. FIEGER (P30441) FIEGER LAW FIRM Attorneys for Plaintiff 19390 West Ten Mile Road Southfield, MI 48075 (248) 355-5555 / COMPLAINT AND JURY DEMAND There is no other pending or resolved civil action arising out of the same transaction or occurrence alleged in the complaint. /s/ James S. Craig FILED IN MY OFFICE WAYNE COUNTY CLERK 7/20/2015 11:40:51 AM CATHY M. GARRETT COMPLAINT AND JURY DEMAND NOW COME Plaintiffs, HOWARD LINDEN, as Personal Representative for the Estate of I NAYAH WRIGHT TRUSSEL, deceased, by and through their attorneys, The FIEGER LAW FIRM, and for their Complaint against the above named Defendants state as follows: 1

COMMON ALLEGATIONS 1. At all times relevant hereto, Plaintiff s decedent, I NAYAH WRIGHT TRUSSEL, was an infant living with her mother, JANEE WRIGHT-TRUSSEL, in the City of Detroit, County of Wayne, State of Michigan. 2. That HOWARD LINDEN has been duly appointed Personal Representative of the Estate of I NAYAH WRIGHT TRUSSEL by the Wayne County Probate Court. 3. Upon information and belief, Defendant ANN MARIE THOMAS was/is a resident of the City of Detroit, County of Wayne, State of Michigan. 4. That Defendant, CITY OF DETROIT, is a chartered municipal corporation, organized and existing under and by virtue of the laws of the State of Michigan. 5. That Defendant DETROIT FIRE DEPARTMENT is a department of the CITY OF DETROIT operating EMT services in Wayne County for the CITY OF DETROIT. 6. At all times relevant hereto, Defendant ANN MARIE THOMAS, was a certified EMT Technician employed by the CITY OF DETROIT and assigned to the DETROIT FIRE DEPARTMENT as an EMT first responder. 7. That the acts, errors and omissions enumerated herein, which amount to gross negligence, were committed by Defendant ANN MARIE THOMAS while she was acting within the course and scope of her employment with the CITY OF DETROIT. 8. That Defendants are not immune from suit by governmental immunity for claims of gross negligence and/ or intentional infliction of emotional distress. 9. That the acts, transactions, occurrences, and/or omissions occurred within the City of Detroit, County of Wayne, State of Michigan. 2

10. The amount in controversy herein exceeds the sum of Twenty-Five Thousand ($25,000.00) Dollars exclusive of costs, interest, and attorney fees. FACTUAL ALLEGATIONS 11. On May 30, 2015, an eight-month-old infant girl named I NAYAH WRIGHT TRUSSEL, residing at 19945 Glastonbury Road in the City of Detroit, stopped breathing. 12. The infant s mother, JANEE WRIGHT-TRUSSEL, immediately called her grandmother, Pamela Thomas who then called 911 to summon emergency medical assistance. 13. The call was relayed to CITY OF DETROIT Emergency Medical Services who stated that an EMS unit would be dispatched to the residence forthwith. 14. That Defendant, ANN MARIE THOMAS was then dispatched to the scene and told that a premature baby was struggling to breathe and that she needed to make the scene. 15. Subsequently, the infant s mother, JANEE WRIGHT-TRUSSEL called 911 again, telling them that her eight-month-old girl, I NAYAH WRIGHT TRUSSEL had stopped breathing and that she needed help immediately. 16. After being instructed to go to the scene, ANN MARIE THOMAS drove toward the location of Glastonbury Road. When she arrived, instead of rushing to help save the infant's life THOMAS parked her emergency vehicle around the corner from the house where the infant, I Nayah Wright-Trussell lay struggling to breathe. 17. THOMAS then waited six minutes before telling dispatchers that she didn't want to help stating: I m not about to be on no scene 10 minutes doing CPR, you know how these families get. 3

18. City dispatchers however, pleaded with her to go help the baby stating: I m going to need you to make that scene. You re going to have to make patient contact. 19. THOMAS however, refused and would not go to the house to assist the baby's distraught mother Janee Wright-Trussell. 20. Eventually, another EMS unit arrived to the home and began to administer CPR. A few minutes later I NAYAH WRIGHT TRUSSEL was taken to Sinai-Grace Hospital by a different ambulance, but died the next morning. 21. Following her death CITY OF DETROIT authorities carried out an internal investigation into the incident and determined that the actions of EMT THOMAS directly contributed to an approximate 19 minute response time delay and terminated her employment with the Detroit Fire Department. COUNT I GROSS NEGLIGENCE ALL DEFENDANTS 22. Plaintiffs hereby restate and reallege Paragraphs 1-21 as if fully set forth herein. 23. That on May 30, 2015, Defendant, ANN MARIE THOMAS was informed that an eight month old baby girl was in desperate need of medical treatment. Defendant, ANN MARIE THOMAS had enough information that I NAYAH WRIGHT TRUSSEL was suffering from an emergency and required immediate medical attention. 24. After being notified and instructed to make contact with decedent, ANN MARIE THOMAS demonstrated conduct so reckless that it demonstrates a substantial lack of concern for whether any injury would result to the decedent, an eight month old infant girl. 4

25. That by ignoring and failing to respond to Plaintiff s decedent, I NAYAH WRIGHT TRUSSEL s emergency medical condition Defendant ANN MARIE THOMAS acted recklessly and was grossly negligent. 26. At all times relevant, Defendants, ANN MARIE THOMAS should have made contact with Plaintiff s decedent, I NAYAH WRIGHT TRUSSEL to provide immediate medical attention. 27. Defendants ANN MARIE THOMAS outright refusal to respond to provide medical attention to Plaintiff s Decedent, I NAYAH WRIGHT TRUSSEL amounts to intentional, extreme, and outrageous conduct. 28. Upon all information and belief, when EMS finally arrived to the home on Glastonbury Road, I NAYAH WRIGHT TRUSSEL was then given CPR and taken to Sinai Hospital whereupon she later expired due to the Defendant s gross negligence and/or reckless misconduct. 29. At all times relevant had Defendant timely and appropriately responded to the 911 phone call(s) Plaintiff s decedent, I NAYAH WRIGHT TRUSSEL would not have suffered the injuries complained of including, conscious pain and suffering and eventually death and JANEE WRIGHT-TRUSSEL would not have suffered the injuries complained of including but not limited to emotional injuries. 30. At all times relevant hereto, Defendant, ANN MARIE THOMAS had a duty to refrain from committing acts of intentional misconduct, acts of malfeasance, and gross negligence. 5

31. At all times relevant hereto, Defendant, ANN MARIE THOMAS breached said duties and committed acts of intentional misconduct, acts of malfeasance, and gross negligence, including, but not limited to, the following: a. Failing to timely response to administer emergency medical treatment to Plaintiff s decedent, I Nayah Wright Trussel; b. Engaging in conduct so reckless that it demonstrates a substantial lack of concern for whether any injury would result; c. Intentionally causing Janee Wright-Trussel to suffer extreme emotional distress; d. Actively withholding medical assistance to I Nayah Wright Trussel resulting in her death; e. Affirmatively abrogating her obligations as a City of Detroit EMT by failing to timely respond to Plaintiff decedent s emergency medical condition; and f. Engaging in other acts of misconduct, gross negligence and/or intentional malfeasance which may become known prior to trial. 32. That the grossly negligent and wilful misconduct committed by Defendant, ANN MARIE THOMAS, as described herein, was committed within the course and scope of her employment and agency such that Defendant, CITY OF DETROIT is vicariously liable. 33. As the direct and proximate result of these acts and/or omissions by the Defendant ANN MARIE THOMAS, Plaintiff s decedent, I NAYAH WRIGHT TRUSSEL, and the Estate of I NAYAH WRIGHT TRUSSEL suffered serious injuries including, but not limited to, the following: a. Conscious pain and suffering; b. Reasonable medical, funeral and burial expenses; 6

c. Fright, shock and terror; d. Loss of the love, society, companionship, and parental guidance of the decedent; e. Loss of service of Plaintiffs decedent; f. Future loss of income and/ or earning capacity; g. Miscellaneous economic damages, past, present and future; h. Exemplary damages and/ or punitive damages; and i. Any and all damages allowable under the Michigan Wrongful Death Act (MCL 600.2922) and otherwise learned through the course of discovery. 34. The Defendant, ANN MARIE THOMAS was the proximate cause of the Plaintiffs injuries and death. WHEREFORE, Plaintiff requests that this Court enter a judgment against Defendants for an amount in excess of One Million ($1,000,000.00) Dollars, together with interest, costs and attorney fees. COUNT II INTENTIONAL INFLICTION OF EMOTIONAL DISTRESS ALL DEFENDANTS 35. Plaintiffs hereby restate and reallege Paragraphs 1-34 as if fully set forth herein. 36. The acts of the Defendant, ANN MARIE THOMAS, as described above were extreme, outrageous, and committed with gross negligence. 37. Said acts as described above were intentionally and/or recklessly done and had the effect of causing JANEE WRIGHT-TRUSSEL severe emotional distress. 7

38. As the direct and proximate result of the outrageous conduct of Defendant, JANEE WRIGHT-TRUSSEL suffered severe emotional distress and horrible injuries and damages including, but not limited to the following: a. Emotional injuries; b. Mortification and humiliation; c. Mental anguish; nightmares; fright and shock; d. Economic loss; e. Loss of great sums of money for medical, emotional and/or psychological care and treatment, past, present and future, as well the loss of earnings and/or earning capacity from these injuries; f. Any other additional injuries recoverable under Michigan law including economic loss, as well as past, present and future medical treatment needed as learned through continued discovery. 39. That the grossly negligent and willful misconduct committed by Defendant, ANN MARIE THOMAS, as described herein, was committed within the course and scope of her employment and agency such that Defendant, CITY OF DETROIT is vicariously liable. WHEREFORE, Plaintiff requests that this Court enter a judgment against Defendants for an amount in excess of One Million ($1,000,000.00) Dollars, together with interest, costs and attorney fees. Dated: July 20, 2015 Respectfully submitted, FIEGER LAW BY: /s/ James S. Craig Attorney for Plaintiff 19390 W. Ten Mile Road Southfield, MI 48075 (248) 355-5555 j.craig@fiegerlaw.com 8

STATE OF MICHIGAN IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR THE COUNTY OF WAYNE HOWARD LINDEN, as Personal Representative for the Estate of I NAYAH WRIGHT TRUSSEL, and JANEE WRIGHT-TRUSSEL, Individually, vs. Plaintiffs, Case No. 15- NO HON. CITY OF DETROIT, DETROIT FIRE DEPARTMENT and ANN MARIE THOMAS, Defendants. / GEOFFREY N. FIEGER (P30441) FIEGER LAW FIRM Attorneys for Plaintiff 19390 West Ten Mile Road Southfield, MI 48075 (248) 355-5555 / DEMAND FOR TRIAL BY JURY NOW COME Plaintiffs, HOWARD LINDEN, as Personal Representative for the Estate of I NAYAH WRIGHT TRUSSEL, deceased, by and through their attorneys, The FIEGER LAW FIRM, hereby demands a jury trial on all issues. Respectfully submitted, FIEGER LAW Dated: July 20, 2015 BY: _/s/ James S. Craig Attorney for Plaintiff 19390 W. Ten Mile Road Southfield, MI 48075 (248) 355-5555 j.craig@fiegerlaw.com 9