FOURTH SECTION. CASE OF BOLDIJAR AND OTHERS v. ROMANIA. (Application no /14 and 15 others - see appended list) JUDGMENT STRASBOURG

Similar documents
THIRD SECTION. CASE OF NOVINSKIY AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA. (Application no /07 and 7 others see appended list) JUDGMENT STRASBOURG.

THIRD SECTION. CASE OF ZELENKOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA. (Applications nos. 8306/10 and 6 others see appended list) JUDGMENT STRASBOURG

FOURTH SECTION. CASE OF STEMPLYS AND DEBESYS v. LITHUANIA. (Applications nos /13 and 71974/13) JUDGMENT STRASBOURG.

FOURTH SECTION. CASE OF DORIĆ v. BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA. (Application no /13) JUDGMENT STRASBOURG. 7 November 2017

FIFTH SECTION. CASE OF PEČENKO v. SLOVENIA. (Application no. 6387/10) JUDGMENT

FOURTH SECTION. CASE OF ROMANESCU v. ROMANIA. (Application no /11) JUDGMENT STRASBOURG. 16 May 2017

THIRD SECTION. CASE OF BORISENKO AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA. (Applications nos /09, 58052/09, 49397/10, 41901/11, 19251/13 and 13382/14) JUDGMENT

THIRD SECTION. CASE OF NOSENKO AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA. (Application no. 6116/10 and 5 others - see appended list) JUDGMENT STRASBOURG.

FIFTH SECTION. CASE OF T.H. v. IRELAND. (Application no /06) JUDGMENT STRASBOURG. 8 December 2011

THIRD SECTION. CASE OF ION TUDOR v. ROMANIA. (Application no /06) JUDGMENT STRASBOURG. 17 December 2013 FINAL 17/03/2014

FIFTH SECTION. CASE OF ROONEY v. IRELAND. (Application no /10) JUDGMENT STRASBOURG. 31 October 2013

FIRST SECTION. CASE OF SIMONYAN v. ARMENIA. (Application no /08) JUDGMENT STRASBOURG. 7 April 2016

THIRD SECTION. CASE OF POTCOAVĂ v. ROMANIA. (Application no /07) JUDGMENT STRASBOURG. 17 December 2013

FIRST SECTION. CASE OF ZAVORIN v. RUSSIA. (Application no /11) JUDGMENT STRASBOURG. 15 January 2015

THIRD SECTION. CASE OF GHARIBYAN AND OTHERS v. ARMENIA. (Application no /05) JUDGMENT STRASBOURG. 13 November 2014 FINAL 13/02/2015

FOURTH SECTION. CASE OF GOŁAWSKI AND PISAREK v. POLAND. (Application no /10) JUDGMENT STRASBOURG. 27 May 2014

FIFTH SECTION. CASE OF CUŠKO v. LATVIA. (Application no /09) JUDGMENT STRASBOURG. 7 December 2017

FIFTH SECTION. CASE OF C. v. IRELAND. (Application no /08) JUDGMENT STRASBOURG. 1 March 2012

FIFTH SECTION. CASE OF RANGELOV AND STEFANOV v. BULGARIA. (Application no /04)

FIRST SECTION. CASE OF GORESKI AND OTHERS v. THE FORMER YUGOSLAV REPUBLIC OF MACEDONIA. (Application no /04) JUDGMENT STRASBOURG

FIFTH SECTION. CASE OF STEFANOV & YURUKOV v. BULGARIA. (Application no /04)

THIRD SECTION. CASE OF PAUL AND BORODIN v. RUSSIA. (Application no /14) JUDGMENT STRASBOURG. 13 November 2018

THIRD SECTION. CASE OF U.N. v. RUSSIA. (Application no /15) JUDGMENT STRASBOURG. 26 July 2016

SECOND SECTION. CASE OF MAIORANO AND SERAFINI v. ITALY. (Application no. 997/05) JUDGMENT STRASBOURG. 25 November 2014

THIRD SECTION. CASE OF BOTEZATU v. THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA. (Application no /08) JUDGMENT STRASBOURG. 14 April 2015 FINAL 14/07/2015

FIRST SECTION. CASE OF HOVHANNISYAN v. ARMENIA. (Application no /08) JUDGMENT STRASBOURG. 20 July 2017

COUR EUROPÉENNE DES DROITS DE L HOMME EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS

FIFTH SECTION. CASE OF ALEKSANDR NIKONENKO v. UKRAINE. (Application no /08) JUDGMENT STRASBOURG. 14 November 2013 FINAL 14/02/2014

FIRST SECTION. CASE OF PAPOYAN v. ARMENIA. (Application no. 7205/11) JUDGMENT STRASBOURG. 11 January 2018

SECOND SECTION. CASE OF GURBAN v. TURKEY. (Application no. 4947/04) JUDGMENT STRASBOURG. 15 December 2015

FIRST SECTION. CASE OF CUNHA MARTINS DA SILVA COUTO v. PORTUGAL. (Application no /12) JUDGMENT STRASBOURG. 30 April 2015

SECOND SECTION. CASE OF VUČINIĆ v. MONTENEGRO. (Application no /10) JUDGMENT STRASBOURG. 5 September 2017

FOURTH SECTION. CASE OF MANOLE AND OTHERS v. MOLDOVA. (Application no /02)

COUR EUROPÉENNE DES DROITS DE L HOMME EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS FOURTH SECTION. CASE OF KARAOĞLAN v. TURKEY. (Application no /00) JUDGMENT

FOURTH SECTION. CASE OF DICKMANN AND GION v. ROMANIA. (Applications nos /03 and 10893/04) JUDGMENT (Revision 1 ) STRASBOURG.

FIFTH SECTION. CASE OF ROSEN PETKOV v. BULGARIA. (Application no /01) JUDGMENT STRASBOURG. 2 September 2010

FOURTH SECTION. CASE OF GISZCZAK v. POLAND. (Application no /08) JUDGMENT STRASBOURG. 29 November 2011 FINAL 29/02/2012

FIFTH SECTION. CASE OF HARTMAN v. SLOVENIA. (Application no /05) JUDGMENT STRASBOURG. 18 October 2012 FINAL 18/01/2013

SECOND SECTION. CASE OF VAJNAI v. HUNGARY. (Application no. 6061/10) JUDGMENT STRASBOURG. 23 September 2014

FIFTH SECTION. CASE OF YANKOV AND OTHERS v. BULGARIA. (Application no. 4570/05) JUDGMENT STRASBOURG. 23 September 2010

THIRD SECTION. CASE OF G.B. AND R.B. v. THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA. (Application no /09) JUDGMENT STRASBOURG. 18 December 2012 FINAL 18/03/2013

THIRD SECTION. CASE OF IBROGIMOV v. RUSSIA. (Application no /12) JUDGMENT STRASBOURG. 15 May 2018

COUR EUROPÉENNE DES DROITS DE L HOMME EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS FIRST SECTION. CASE OF LUCHKINA v. RUSSIA. (Application no.

FOURTH SECTION. CASE OF PRESCHER v. BULGARIA. (Application no. 6767/04) JUDGMENT STRASBOURG. 7 June 2011 FINAL 07/09/2011

COUR EUROPÉENNE DES DROITS DE L HOMME EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS

SECOND SECTION. CASE OF KÖSE v. TURKEY. (Application no /02) JUDGMENT STRASBOURG. 7 December 2010 FINAL 07/03/2011

FOURTH SECTION. CASE OF MATEUS PEREIRA DA SILVA v. PORTUGAL. (Application no /13) JUDGMENT STRASBOURG. 25 July 2017

COUR EUROPÉENNE DES DROITS DE L HOMME EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS FIFTH SECTION. CASE OF NALBANTOVA v. BULGARIA. (Application no.

THIRD SECTION. CASE OF JOVIČIĆ AND OTHERS v. SERBIA

SECOND SECTION. CASE OF NEKVEDAVIČIUS v. LITHUANIA. (Application no. 1471/05) JUDGMENT (Just satisfaction) STRASBOURG.

COUR EUROPÉENNE DES DROITS DE L HOMME EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS FIRST SECTION. CASE OF KASTELIC v. CROATIA. (Application no /00) JUDGMENT

Judgments concerning Hungary, Latvia, Poland, Romania and Turkey

THIRD SECTION. CASE OF HANU v. ROMANIA. (Application no /04) JUDGMENT STRASBOURG. 4 June 2013

FOURTH SECTION. CASE OF VASSALLO v. MALTA. (Application no /09) JUDGMENT. (Just satisfaction) STRASBOURG. 6 November 2012 FINAL 06/02/2013

COUR EUROPÉENNE DES DROITS DE L HOMME EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS SECOND SECTION. CASE OF BERTUZZI v. FRANCE. (Application no /97) JUDGMENT

COUR EUROPÉENNE DES DROITS DE L HOMME EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS SECOND SECTION. CASE OF OOO RUSATOMMET v. RUSSIA. (Application no.

FIRST SECTION. CASE OF KAREN POGHOSYAN v. ARMENIA. (Application no /09) JUDGMENT (Just satisfaction) STRASBOURG.

Chamber judgments concerning Bulgaria, Romania, and Turkey. Karaivanova and Mileva v. Bulgaria (application no /05)

FIFTH SECTION. CASE OF PENEV v. BULGARIA. (Application no /04)

FOURTH SECTION. (Application no /95) JUDGMENT STRASBOURG. 12 November 2002 FI AL 12/02/2003

SECOND SECTION. CASE OF SAVCA v. THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA. (Application no /08) JUDGMENT STRASBOURG. 15 March 2016

COUR EUROPÉENNE DES DROITS DE L HOMME EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS FOURTH SECTION. CASE OF PŁOSKI v. POLAND. (Application no /95) JUDGMENT

COUR EUROPÉENNE DES DROITS DE L HOMME EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS SECOND SECTION. CASE OF STEVANOVIĆ v. SERBIA. (Application no.

FIFTH SECTION. CASE OF GEORGIEVA AND MUKAREVA v. BULGARIA. (Application no. 3413/05) JUDGMENT STRASBOURG. 2 September 2010

COUR EUROPÉENNE DES DROITS DE L HOMME EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS FOURTH SECTION. CASE OF PUHK v. ESTONIA. (Application no /00) JUDGMENT

FIRST SECTION. CASE OF KNEŽEVIĆ v. CROATIA. (Application no /13) JUDGMENT STRASBOURG. 19 October 2017

COUR EUROPÉENNE DES DROITS DE L HOMME EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS FOURTH SECTION

THIRD SECTION. CASE OF BALAN AND OTHERS v. SLOVAKIA. (Applications nos /11 and 46098/12) JUDGMENT (Revision) STRASBOURG.

COUR EUROPÉENNE DES DROITS DE L HOMME EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS

SECOND SECTION. CASE OF EŞİM v. TURKEY. (Application no /09) JUDGMENT STRASBOURG. 17 September 2013 FINAL 17/12/2013

Detention for 27 days in personal space of less than 3 square metres was inhuman and degrading treatment

FIFTH SECTION. CASE OF RAMISHVILI v. GEORGIA. (Application no /08)

FIFTH SECTION. CASE OF BASARBA OOD v. BULGARIA. (Application no /01) JUDGMENT (merits) STRASBOURG. 7 January 2010

FOURTH SECTION. CASE OF NOREIKIENĖ AND NOREIKA v. LITHUANIA. (Application no /08) JUDGMENT (Just satisfaction striking out) STRASBOURG

FOURTH SECTION. CASE OF CHINNICI v. ITALY (No. 2) (Application no /03) JUDGMENT STRASBOURG. 14 April 2015

COUR EUROPÉENNE DES DROITS DE L HOMME EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS

SECOND SECTION. CASE OF SORGUÇ v. TURKEY. (Application no /03) JUDGMENT

FIRST SECTION. CASE OF SERGEY SMIRNOV v. RUSSIA. (Application no /04)

FIFTH SECTION. CASE OF KUZMENKO v. UKRAINE. (Application no /07) JUDGMENT STRASBOURG. 9 March 2017

THIRD SECTION. CASE OF TSATURYAN v. ARMENIA. (Application no /03) JUDGMENT STRASBOURG. 10 January 2012 FINAL 10/04/2012

FIFTH SECTION. CASE OF NIELSEN v. DENMARK. (Application no /07) JUDGMENT STRASBOURG. 2 July 2009 FINAL 02/10/2009

THIRD SECTION. CASE OF MAGHERINI v. ITALY. (Application no /01) JUDGMENT STRASBOURG. 1 June 2006

COUR EUROPÉENNE DES DROITS DE L HOMME EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS

THIRD SECTION. CASE OF NIŢULESCU v. ROMANIA. (Application no /06) JUDGMENT STRASBOURG. 22 September 2015

Judgments concerning Hungary, Poland, Romania, and Turkey

Decision adopted by the Committee at its fifty-second session, 28 April 23 May Sergei Kirsanov (not represented by counsel)

European Court of Human Rights. Questions & Answers

FOURTH SECTION. CASE OF KAZLAUSKAS AND NANARTONIS v. LITHUANIA. (Applications nos. 234/15 and 22357/15) JUDGMENT STRASBOURG.

SECOND SECTION. CASE OF KAREMANI v. ALBANIA. (Application no /08) JUDGMENT STRASBOURG. 25 September 2018

FOURTH SECTION. CASE OF GARZIČIĆ v. MONTENEGRO. (Application no /07) JUDGMENT STRASBOURG. 21 September 2010 FINAL 21/12/2010

SECOND SECTION. CASE OF ÖNER AND TÜRK v. TURKEY. (Application no /12) JUDGMENT STRASBOURG. 31 March 2015 FINAL 30/06/2015

COUR EUROPÉENNE DES DROITS DE L HOMME EUROPEAN COURTOFHUMAN RIGHTS

FIFTH SECTION. CASE OF YONKOV v. BULGARIA. (Application no /06) JUDGMENT STRASBOURG. 2 September 2010

SECOND SECTION. CASE OF AHMET DURAN v. TURKEY. (Application no /06) JUDGMENT STRASBOURG. 28 August 2012 FINAL 28/11/2012

SECOND SECTION. CASE OF HORVÁTH AND VAJNAI v. HUNGARY. (Application nos /11 and 55798/11) JUDGMENT STRASBOURG.

FOURTH SECTION. CASE OF ŠIDLAUSKAS v. LITHUANIA. (Application no /10) JUDGMENT STRASBOURG. 11 July 2017

THIRD SECTION. CASE OF M.S.A. AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA. (Application no /14 and 8 others see appended list) JUDGMENT

FIFTH SECTION. CASE OF SUPERWOOD HOLDINGS PLC AND OTHERS v. IRELAND. (Application no. 7812/04) JUDGMENT STRASBOURG.

SECOND SECTION. CASE OF FOKAS v. TURKEY. (Application no /02) JUDGMENT (Just satisfaction) STRASBOURG. 1 October 2013 FINAL 01/01/2014

EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS. Press release issued by the Registrar. CHAMBER JUDGMENT IN THE CASE OF KALASHNIKOV v. RUSSIA

Transcription:

FOURTH SECTION CASE OF BOLDIJAR AND OTHERS v. ROMANIA ( 46831/14 and 15 others - see appended list) JUDGMENT STRASBOURG 29 March 2018 This judgment is final but it may be subject to editorial revision.

BOLDIJAR AND OTHERS v. ROMANIA JUDGMENT 1 In the case of Boldijar and Others v. Romania, The European Court of Human Rights (Fourth Section), sitting as a Committee composed of: Vincent A. De Gaetano, President, Georges Ravarani, Marko Bošnjak, judges, and Liv Tigerstedt Acting Deputy Section Registrar, Having deliberated in private on 8 March 2018, Delivers the following judgment, which was adopted on that date: PROCEDURE 1. The case originated in applications against Romania lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms ( the Convention ) on the various dates indicated in the appended table. 2. The applications were communicated to the Romanian Government ( the Government ). THE FACTS 3. The list of s and the relevant details of the applications are set out in the appended table. 4. The s complained of the inadequate conditions of their detention. THE LAW I. JOINDER OF THE APPLICATIONS 5. Having regard to the similar subject matter of the applications, the Court finds it appropriate to examine them jointly in a single judgment. II. ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 3 OF THE CONVENTION 6. The s complained of the inadequate conditions of their detention. They relied on Article 3 of the Convention, which reads as follows:

2 BOLDIJAR AND OTHERS v. ROMANIA JUDGMENT Article 3 No one shall be subjected to torture or to inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment. A. Admissibility 7. In application no. 51850/15, the Government raised a preliminary objection of non-compliance with the six-month time-limit. They observed that, from 18 November 2014 to 25 May 2015, the disposed of 5.04 sq. m of personal space, arguing that this period interrupted the continuity of his situation. For this reason, the Government further argued that the s complaint concerning his detention in Giurgiu Prison from 13 October 2014 to 25 May 2015 was lodged out of time. Consequently, the Government asked the Court to examine the s complaint regarding the inadequate conditions of his detention in Giurgiu and Jilava Prisons only as of 25 May 2015. 8. The Court notes that, even though the disposed of more than 4 sq. m of personal space, other aspects of the physical conditions of detention remain relevant for the Court s assessment of the adequacy of the s conditions of detention under Article 3 of the Convention (see, for example, Muršić v. Croatia [GC], no. 7334/13, 140, ECHR 2016). In the s case, such aspects included, in particular, an infestation of the cell with insects, poor quality of bedding and bed linen, poor quality of food and a lack of adequate furniture. In this regard, the Court further notes that it is not convinced by the Government s observations on the adequacy of the aforementioned aspects of the physical conditions of the s detention and finds that, overall, the conditions of the s detention in Giurgiu Prison remained inadequate. It follows that the Government s preliminary objection must be rejected. 9. The Court therefore finds that the applications listed in the appended table are not manifestly ill-founded within the meaning of Article 35 3 (a) of the Convention. It further notes that they are not inadmissible on any other grounds. They must therefore be declared admissible. B. Merits 10. The Court notes that the s were kept in detention in poor conditions. The details of the s detention are indicated in the appended table. The Court refers to the principles established in its case-law regarding inadequate conditions of detention (see, for instance, Muršić, cited above, 96-101). It reiterates in particular that a serious lack of space in a prison cell weighs heavily as a factor to be taken into account for the purpose of establishing whether the detention conditions described are degrading from the point of view of Article 3 and may disclose a

BOLDIJAR AND OTHERS v. ROMANIA JUDGMENT 3 violation, both alone or taken together with other shortcomings (see Muršić, cited above, 122-141, and Ananyev and Others v. Russia, nos. 42525/07 and 60800/08, 149-159, 10 January 2012). 11. In the pilot case of Rezmiveș and Others v. Romania, nos. 61467/12 and 3 others, 25 April 2017, the Court already found a violation in respect of issues similar to those in the present case. 12. Having examined all the material submitted to it, the Court has not found any fact or argument capable of persuading it to reach a different conclusion. Having regard to its case-law on the subject, the Court considers that in the instant case the s conditions of detention were inadequate. 13. These complaints therefore disclose a breach of Article 3 of the Convention. III. APPLICATION OF ARTICLE 41 OF THE CONVENTION 14. Article 41 of the Convention provides: If the Court finds that there has been a violation of the Convention or the Protocols thereto, and if the internal law of the High Contracting Party concerned allows only partial reparation to be made, the Court shall, if necessary, afford just satisfaction to the injured party. 15. Regard being had to the documents in its possession and to its case-law (see, in particular, Rezmiveș and Others v. Romania, nos. 61467/12 and 3 others, 25 April 2017), the Court considers it reasonable to award the sums indicated in the appended table. 16. The Court considers it appropriate that the default interest rate should be based on the marginal lending rate of the European Central Bank, to which should be added three percentage points. FOR THESE REASONS, THE COURT, UNANIMOUSLY, 1. Decides to join the applications; 2. Declares the applications admissible; 3. Holds that these applications disclose a breach of Article 3 of the Convention concerning the inadequate conditions of detention;

4 BOLDIJAR AND OTHERS v. ROMANIA JUDGMENT 4. Holds (a) that the respondent State is to pay the s, within three months, the amounts indicated in the appended table, to be converted into the currency of the respondent State at the rate applicable at the date of settlement; (b) that from the expiry of the above-mentioned three months until settlement simple interest shall be payable on the above amounts at a rate equal to the marginal lending rate of the European Central Bank during the default period plus three percentage points. Done in English, and notified in writing on 29 March 2018, pursuant to Rule 77 2 and 3 of the Rules of Court. Liv Tigerstedt Acting Deputy Registrar Vincent A. De Gaetano President

BOLDIJAR AND OTHERS v. ROMANIA JUDGMENT 5 APPENDIX List of applications raising complaints under Article 3 of the Convention (inadequate conditions of detention) 1. 46831/14 04/08/2014 Remus Boldijar 04/05/1975 Miercurea-Ciuc Prison 13/02/2014 to 20/02/2015 1 year(s) and 8 day(s) 0.87-2.04 m² overcrowding, lack of or insufficient physical exercise in fresh air, poor quality of food, lack of fresh air, lack of or inadequate hygienic facilities, inadequate temperature, infestation of cell with insects/rodents Codlea Prison 20/02/2015 pending More than 2 year(s) and 11 month(s) and 4 day(s) lack of or inadequate hygienic facilities, poor quality of food, mouldy or dirty cell, lack of or restricted access to leisure or educational activities, lack of toiletries 2. 541/15 28/01/2015 Remus-Nicușor Moldovan 10/03/1988 Bistrița Prison 30/05/2014 to 05/02/2015 8 month(s) and 7 day(s) infestation of cell with insects/rodents, lack of or poor quality of bedding and bed linen, lack or inadequate furniture, lack of or inadequate hygienic facilities, no or restricted access to warm water, lack of or insufficient physical exercise in fresh air 1,000 3. 15555/15 09/05/2015 4. 27174/15 Vasile Meterez 17/10/1971 Ialomița County Police Arrest 26/02/2014 to 3.80-7.60 m² lack of or inadequate hygienic facilities, mouldy or dirty cell, no or restricted access to warm water, lack of or insufficient physical exercise in fresh air, passive smoking 1 Plus any tax that may be chargeable to the s.

6 BOLDIJAR AND OTHERS v. ROMANIA JUDGMENT 02/11/2015 Represented by Peter Irina Maria BUCHAREST 26/05/2014 3 month(s) and 1 day(s) Poarta Albă Prison Hospital 05/05/2014 to 16/05/2014 12 day(s) 5.06-12.54 m² lack of or poor quality of bedding and bed linen, infestation of cell with insects/rodents, poor quality of food Slobozia Prison 26/05/2014 to 23/03/2015 9 month(s) and 26 day(s) 2.1-2.32 m² overcrowding, insufficient number of sleeping places, passive smoking, mouldy or dirty cell, infestation of cell with insects/rodents, no or restricted access to shower, inadequate temperature, lack of fresh air, lack of or insufficient physical exercise in fresh air, lack of or inadequate hygienic facilities, lack or inadequate furniture, lack of or poor quality of bedding and bed linen Rahova Prison 23/03/2015 to 02/07/2015 3 month(s) and 10 day(s) 2.44-2.73 m² overcrowding, lack of or poor quality of bedding and bed linen, infestation of cell with insects/rodents, lack or inadequate furniture, lack of or inadequate hygienic facilities, no or restricted access to warm water, passive smoking, lack of or restricted access to leisure or educational activities, mouldy or dirty cell Slobozia Prison 02/07/2015 to 19/05/2016 10 month(s) and 18 day(s) 1.97-2.2 m² overcrowding, passive smoking, lack of or insufficient physical exercise in fresh air, lack of or poor quality of bedding and bed linen, infestation of cell with insects/rodents, lack or inadequate furniture, poor quality of food, poor quality of potable water, lack of or inadequate hygienic facilities

BOLDIJAR AND OTHERS v. ROMANIA JUDGMENT 7 5. 23681/15 07/07/2015 6. 34879/15 13/07/2015 Romeo Gabriel Ardelean 18/10/1979 Igor Podhraški 06/11/1970 Represented by Cornoiu Teodorian CLUJ-NAPOCA Miercurea-Ciuc Prison 26/02/2014 to 06/09/2016 2 year(s) and 6 month(s) and 12 day(s) Cluj County Police Arrest 29/12/2014 to 27/01/2015 30 day(s) 0.87-2.14 m² overcrowding, lack of or inadequate hygienic facilities, mouldy or dirty cell, lack or inadequate furniture, infestation of cell with insects/rodents, poor quality of food 3.77 m² no or restricted access to toilet, lack of or inadequate hygienic facilities, no or restricted access to warm water, mouldy or dirty cell, lack of fresh air, lack of or insufficient natural light, lack of or insufficient electric light, lack of or insufficient physical exercise in fresh air, poor quality of food, lack of or poor quality of bedding and bed linen 1,000 Gherla Prison 27/01/2015 to 18/09/2015 7 month(s) and 23 day(s) 2.07-2.43 m² overcrowding, lack of or inadequate hygienic facilities, mouldy or dirty cell, poor quality of food, lack of fresh air 7. 41903/15 09/09/2015 8. 43383/15 15/09/2015 Robert Andreas Bedners 10/01/1990 Ionuț Prața 28/07/1976 Miercurea Ciuc Prison 26/02/2015 to 30/05/2017 2 year(s) and 3 month(s) and 5 day(s) Colibași Prison 13/11/2014 to 08/08/2016 1 year(s) and 8 month(s) and 27 day(s) 0.87-2.14 m² overcrowding, lack of fresh air, lack of or insufficient natural light, lack of or inadequate hygienic facilities, lack or inadequate furniture, poor quality of food, infestation of cell with insects/rodents, lack of or insufficient physical exercise in fresh air 1.88-1.96 m² overcrowding, lack of or inadequate hygienic facilities, mouldy or dirty cell, lack of or insufficient electric light, lack of or insufficient natural light, inadequate temperature

8 BOLDIJAR AND OTHERS v. ROMANIA JUDGMENT 9. 46074/15 15/10/2015 Grigore Bîrzava 01/12/1985 Bucharest General Police Arrest 06/06/2013 to 04/07/2013 29 day(s) 2.33 m² overcrowding, infestation of cell with insects/rodents, poor quality of food, lack of or insufficient natural light, lack of fresh air, mouldy or dirty cell, lack of or poor quality of bedding and bed linen, lack or inadequate furniture, lack of or restricted access to leisure or educational activities, lack of or inadequate hygienic facilities, no or restricted access to shower Craiova Prison 04/07/2013 to 12/11/2014 1 year(s) and 4 month(s) and 9 day(s) 1.21-1.7 m² overcrowding, lack or inadequate furniture, lack of or poor quality of bedding and bed linen, infestation of cell with insects/rodents, poor quality of food, inadequate temperature, lack of or insufficient natural light, lack of fresh air, no or restricted access to shower, lack of or restricted access to leisure or educational activities, poor quality of potable water Drobeta Turnu Severin Prison 12/11/2014 to 15/12/2014 1 month(s) and 4 day(s) 1.85 m² overcrowding, lack of fresh air, infestation of cell with insects/rodents, lack of or inadequate hygienic facilities, lack or inadequate furniture, poor quality of food, lack of or insufficient physical exercise in fresh air Târgu-Jiu Prison 15/12/2014 to 28/07/2016 1 year(s) 7 month(s) and 14 day(s) 1.91-1.97 m² overcrowding, poor quality of food, poor quality of potable water, infestation of cell with insects/rodents, lack of or poor quality of bedding and bed linen, lack of or insufficient physical exercise in fresh air 10. 46887/15 19/10/2015 11. 33600/16 30/05/2016 Grigore-Alin Gornoavă 01/12/1981 Gorj County Police Arrest 06/03/2013 to 28/08/2013 4 m² lack of or inadequate hygienic facilities, no or restricted access to toilet, inadequate temperature, lack or inadequate furniture, lack of or insufficient natural light, lack of fresh air, poor quality of food, lack of or insufficient physical

BOLDIJAR AND OTHERS v. ROMANIA JUDGMENT 9 5 month(s) and 23 day(s) exercise in fresh air Craiova Prison 29/08/2013 to 22/02/2016 2 year(s) and 5 month(s) and 25 day(s) 1.08-1.48 m² overcrowding, lack of or inadequate hygienic facilities, lack of or insufficient natural light, lack of fresh air, lack or inadequate furniture, lack of or insufficient physical exercise in fresh air, poor quality of food 12. 50118/15 06/11/2015 Marius-Alexandru Durlea 11/05/1989 Târgu-Jiu Prison 22/02/2016 pending More than 1 year(s) and 11 month(s) and 5 day(s) Teleorman County Police Arrest 23/01/2014 to 05/02/2014 14 day(s) 1.48-2.04 m² 3 m² overcrowding, lack or inadequate furniture, lack of or inadequate hygienic facilities, no or restricted access to shower, constant electric light, lack of fresh air, lack of or insufficient natural light, lack of or insufficient physical exercise in fresh air, poor quality of food, infestation of cell with insects/rodents lack of privacy for toilet, no or restricted access to shower Giurgiu Prison 05/02/2014 to 30/06/2015 1 year(s) and 4 month(s) and 26 day(s) 3.39 m² insufficient sanitary facilities, inadequate temperature, infestation of cell with insects/rodents, lack of or inadequate hygienic facilities, poor quality of food, lack or inadequate furniture, lack of or poor quality of bedding and bed linen Jilava Prison 30/06/2015 pending 1.47-2.7 m² overcrowding, lack of or inadequate hygienic facilities, infestation of cell with insects/rodents, poor quality of food, poor quality of potable water, lack or inadequate furniture,

10 BOLDIJAR AND OTHERS v. ROMANIA JUDGMENT More than 2 year(s) and 6 month(s) and 27 day(s) lack of or poor quality of bedding and bed linen 13. 51850/15 06/11/2015 Sandu Curt 24/08/1978 Represented by Peter Irina Maria BUCHAREST Giurgiu Prison 13/10/2014 to 05/10/2015 11 month(s) and 23 day(s) 3.39-9.2 m² poor quality of food, lack or inadequate furniture, lack of or poor quality of bedding and bed linen, infestation of cell with insects/rodents Jilava Prison 05/10/2015 to 15/09/2016 11 month(s) and 11 day(s) 1.13-1.98 m² overcrowding, lack of or poor quality of bedding and bed linen, infestation of cell with insects/rodents, no or restricted access to shower, lack of or inadequate hygienic facilities, poor quality of food, lack or inadequate furniture 14. 52333/15 10/11/2015 Costel Păun 01/07/1974 Represented by Peter Irina Maria BUCHAREST Bucharest Police Section no. 6 Arrest 13/01/2010 to 02/03/2010 1 month(s) and 18 day(s) 2.37 m² overcrowding, lack of privacy for toilet, lack of or inadequate hygienic facilities, no or restricted access to warm water 5,000 Rahova Prison 01/03/2010 to 25/05/2011 1 year(s) and 2 month(s) and 25 day(s) 1.95-2.44 m² overcrowding, insufficient number of sleeping places, lack of or poor quality of bedding and bed linen, infestation of cell with insects/rodents, lack of or inadequate hygienic facilities, poor quality of food, poor quality of potable water, lack or inadequate furniture Giurgiu Prison 21/05/2011 to 3.39-3.88 m² lack of or poor quality of bedding and bed linen, infestation of cell with insects/rodents, lack of or inadequate hygienic

BOLDIJAR AND OTHERS v. ROMANIA JUDGMENT 11 24/01/2013 1 year(s) and 8 month(s) and 4 day(s) facilities, poor quality of food, poor quality of potable water Jilava Prison 26/01/2013 to 14/01/2016 2 year(s) and 11 month(s) and 20 day(s) 1.44-1.72 m² overcrowding, lack of or poor quality of bedding and bed linen, infestation of cell with insects/rodents, lack of or inadequate hygienic facilities, poor quality of food, poor quality of potable water, lack or inadequate furniture 15. 61992/15 08/01/2016 Claudiu-Florian Isac 31/01/1982 Jilava and Ploiești prisons 29/04/2015 to 27/05/2016 1 year(s) and 29 day(s) 1.57-2.52 m² overcrowding, infestation of cell with insects/rodents, lack of or restricted access to leisure or educational activities 16. 2763/16 24/12/2015 Florin Șumăndan 16/08/1976 Represented by Șumăndan Petru VLADIMIRESCU Arad Prison 11/06/2015 to 07/01/2016 6 month(s) and 28 day(s) 3.48-8.70 m² poor quality of food, infestation of cell with insects/rodents 1,000