CITY OF SIMI VALLEY MEMORANDUM

Similar documents
BEVERLY HILLS AGENDA REPORT. Meeting Date: February 7, 2017 Item Number: D 8 To:

* CITY CHICO City Council Agenda Report

ORDINANCE NO NS AN UNCODIFIED ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA REAUTHORIZING THE PUBLIC, EDUCATIONAL, AND GOVERNMENT

Staff Report. Jeff Lewis, Director of Information Technology

ORDINANCE NO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF REDLANDS DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:

ORDINANCE NO

CITY OF SIMI VALLEY MEMORANDUM

CITY OF SIMI VALLEY MEMORANDUM

CITY COUNCIL SUMMARY REPORT. Agenda No. Keywords: Sewer Connection Fee Ordinance Amendment October Meeting Date: PREPARED BY:

CITY OF SIMI VALLEY MEMORANDUM

TOWN OF JACKSON TOWN COUNCIL AGENDA DOCUMENTATION

ORDINANCE NO AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PERRIS ADOPTING AN AMENDMENT TO THE

PISMO BEACH COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT

ORDINANCE NO

STAFF REPORT SAUSALITO CITY COUNCIL

ORDINANCE NO WHEREAS, the City of Yucaipa supports the full participation of all residents in electing Members of the City Council; and

Req. # SUBSTITUTE ORDINANCE NO

TOWN OF JACKSON TOWN COUNCIL AGENDA DOCUMENTATION

ORDINANCE NO. O

BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LINDEN:

RESOLUTION NO

CITY OF PALMDALE. REPORT to the Mayor and Members of the City Council from the City Manager

ORDINANCE 21, 2014 BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LINWOOD, AS FOLLOWS:

BOROUGH OF MANVILLE ORDINANCE NO

Resolution No

ORDINANCE NO R

THE CODE OF ORDINANCES

STATE OF NEW JERSEY Board of Public Utilities 44 South Clinton Avenue, 9th Floor Post Office Box 350 Trenton, New Jersey

~RLY AGENDA REPORT. Meeting Date: April 11,2013 Item Number: F-5 To: Honorable Mayor & City Council

BOROUGH OF FLORHAM PARK ORDINANCE # 15-21

ORDINANCE NO C.S.

CITY OF SIMI VALLEY MEMORANDUM

STAFF REPORT SAUSALITO CITY COUNCIL

Appendix A: Draft Billboard Ordinance

ADOPTION OF ORDINANCE 571 AMENDING TITLE 4 PUBLIC SAFETY, CHAPTER 3 TRAFFIC, ARTICLE 10 STOPPING, STANDING AND PARKING, SECTION 4-3.

STAFF REPORT. MEETING DATE: April 18, City Council. FROM: Regan M. Candelario, City Manager. PRESENTER: Claudia Laughter, City Clerk

ATTACHMENT A ORDINANCE NO

ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND THE CODE OF ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF HAPEVILLE, GEORGIA, CHAPTER 11, BUSINESS LICENSING AND

Definitions Permit and Exemptions

ORDINANCE NO. WHEREAS, Article XI of the Charter requires the City Commission to place the charter review committee s proposals on the ballot; and

TOWNSHIP CLERK'S OFFICE ORDINANCE COVER PAGE

ORDINANCE # BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF WOODBURY CITY, GLOUCESTER COUNTY, NEW JERSEY, AS FOLLOWS:

Mayor and Members of the City Council President and Members of the Board of Directors of the Estero Municipal Improvement District (EMID)

ORDINANCE provides for the general powers and duties of the City Council and states as follows:

CITY OF MOUNTLAKE TERRACE ORDINANCE NO. 2645

ORDINANCE NO

ORDINANCE NO

CITY OF YPSILANTI NOTICE OF PROPOSED ORDINANCE Ordinance No. 1281

ORDINANCE NO City Attorney Summary

ITEM 3 ATTACHMENT ORDINANCE NO

ORDINANCE NO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN RAFAEL, DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:

THE PEOPLE OF THE CITY OF LOS ANGELES DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:

ORDINANCE NO

ORDINANCE # BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND COMMITTEE OF THE TOWNSHIP OF NORTH HANOVER, AS FOLLOWS:

TOWNSHIP OF WALL ORDINANCE NO ORDINANCE REGULATING THE PLACEMENT AND USE OF CHARITABLE CLOTHING BINS

City Council Meeting Date: 9/22/2015

Item 8C 1 of 17

Agenda Item A.2 CONSENT CALENDAR Meeting Date: June 16, 2009

(Published in the Tulsa World,

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF COMMERCE, TEXAS:

AGENDA REPORT. Meeting Date: August 18, Item Number: E 1. To: Honorable Mayor & City Council. From: Laurence S. Wiener, City Attorney

CITY OF BONITA SPRINGS, FLORIDA ` ORDINANCE NO

ORDINANCE NO AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PERRIS, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AMENDING CHAPTER 18

ORDINANCE NO RECORDS MANAGEMENT ORDINANCE

Staff Report City of Manhattan Beach

ORDINANCE NO THE PEOPLE OF THE CITY OF LOS BANOS DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. PURPOSE.

ORDINANCE NO NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SIMI VALLEY DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:

TITLE 9 BUSINESS REGULATIONS AND LICENSING BUSINESS REGULATIONS AND LICENSING 1

AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF PUYALLUP, WASHINGTON,

BOROUGH OF OLD TAPPAN ORDINANCE NO

ORDINANCE WHEREAS, Section 7.01 of the Charter of the City of Daytona Beach Shores, Florida

CITY OF BEVERLY HILLS COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM TO: Recreation and Parks Commission FROM:

ORDINANCE NO. The Board of Supervisors of the County of Orange, California, ordains as follows: Article 5 LOBBYIST REGISTRATION AND REPORTING

NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:

V:'.1. ITo: BOARD OF SUPERVISORS. ?.>cou, Y > r ".*-<?- " 1. uz'por"

SUMTER COUNTY ORDINANCE

ORDINANCE NO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN RAFAEL DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:

CABLE TELEVISION FRANCHISE AGREEMENT ISSUED BY THE CITY OF GRAND FORKS, NORTH DAKOTA TO MIDCONTINENT COMMUNICATIONS, GP

Information Only BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND COMMITTEE OF THE TOWNSHIP OF SOUTH HARRISON, AS FOLLOWS:

Title 1 GENERAL PROVISIONS

ORDINANCE NO The City Council of the City of Moreno Valley does hereby ordain as follows:

ORDINANCE NO

ORDINANCE Seaside Heights, County of Ocean, and State of New Jersey, as follows:

(Published in the Tulsa Daily Commerce & Legal News,, 2011) ORDINANCE NO.

ORDINANCE NO. 553 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING SEVERAL CHAPTERS OF

VILLAGE OF NORTH RIVERSIDE ORDINANCE NO. 17-O-09

ORDINANCE NO. 690 BE IT ORDAINED BY THE GOVERNING BODY OF THE CITY OF WASHINGTON, KANSAS:

ORDINANCE NO AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CONCORD MUNICIPAL CODE CHAPTER 66, (OFFENSES AND MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS), ARTICLE III (CURFEW FOR MINORS)

AN ORDINANCE ADDING SECTION TO THE EL DORADO COUNTY CODE PROHIBITING THE ESTABLISHMENT OF MEDICAL MARIJUANA DISTRIBUTION FACILITIES

ORDINANCE NO The Board of Supervisors of the County of Sonoma, State of California, ordains as follows:

ORDINANCE NO

ORDINANCE WHEREAS, in all other respects Chapter 125 entitled Mercantile Licenses shall remain in full force and effect.

ORDINANCE NO WHEREAS, the City of Richardson, Texas, desires to actively participate in improving the air quality of the region; and

CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT

AN ORDINANCE OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ALAMEDA COUNTY ADDING CHAPTER 6

ORDINANCE NO NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ENACTED BY THE CITY OF COCOA BEACH, FLORIDA, as follows:

ORDINANCE Borough of Metuchen County of Middlesex State of New Jersey

RANCHO PALOS VERDES CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE: 09/05/2017 AGENDA HEADING: Regular Business

WALNUT VALLEY WATER DISTRICT ORDINANCE NO

CITY OF EDGERTON, KANSAS CHARTER ORDINANCES. CHARTER ORDINANCE NO. 1 (Superseded by Charter Ordinance No. 4)

Transcription:

CITY OF SIMI VALLEY MEMORANDUM AGENDA ITEM NO. 8A March 20, 2017 TO: FROM: City Council SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION OF A SIMI VALLEY MUNICIPAL CODE AMENDMENT TO CHAPTER 10 OF TITLE 5 REAUTHORIZING THE FEE TO SUPPORT THE CITY S PUBLIC, EDUCATIONAL, AND GOVERNMENTAL (PEG) ACCESS CHANNEL FACILITIES, AND INTRODUCTION OF AN ORDINANCE STAFF RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council introduce the attached ordinance (page 4) to reauthorize the fee to support the City s Public, Educational, and Governmental (PEG) access channel facilities codified in Section 5-10.19 of the City of Simi Valley Municipal Code. CITY MANAGER S RECOMMENDATION The City Manager recommends introduction of the ordinance to reauthorize the fee to support the City s PEG access channel facilities fee. BACKGROUND AND OVERVIEW The Digital Infrastructure and Video Competition Act (DIVCA), also known as AB 2987 (Public Utilities Code 5800 et seq.), went into effect on January 1, 2007. This State law created a streamlined process for franchising cable television and video operations in California by shifting franchising authority away from cities and counties to the State, with the Public Utilities Commission (PUC) becoming the sole authority for granting new franchises. In accordance with this law, the City imposes a 1% Public, Educational, and Governmental access fee on all statefranchised video service providers operating within the City to support PEG programming facilities, by means of its ordinance codified in Simi Valley Municipal Code Section 5-10.19. Although the statutory language is not entirely clear, numerous municipalities throughout the State have interpreted the relevant language such that unless a city s ordinance were reauthorized, the 1% PEG access fee may expire on March 30, 2017 1, subject to court interpretation of the States statute. 1 California Public Utilities Code Section 5870(n) provides, in pertinent part: A local entity may, by ordinance, establish a fee to support PEG channel facilities If no such fee exists, the local entity may establish the fee at any time. The fee shall not exceed 1 percent of the holder's gross revenues Notwithstanding this limitation, if, on December 31, 2006, a local entity is imposing a separate fee to support PEG channel facilities that is in excess of 1 percent, that entity may, by ordinance, establish a fee no greater than that separate fee, and in no event greater than 3 percent, to support PEG activities. The ordinance shall expire, and may be reauthorized, upon the expiration of the state franchise.

2 FINDINGS AND ALTERNATIVES DIVCA requires State franchise holders to offer at least three PEG channels to each community in which they operate. DIVCA also authorizes cities to adopt an ordinance imposing a fee on State franchise holders to support PEG programming facilities. The City Council established such a fee on June 18, 2007 by adopting Ordinance No. 1117 (codified in Municipal Code Section 5-10.19) to require video service providers who have been issued State franchises to pay the City a PEG access fee of 1% of the video service provider s gross revenues. DIVCA also provides that certain ordinances adopting a PEG access fee shall expire, and may be reauthorized, upon the expiration of the State franchise, Public Utilities Code section 5870. At this time, the law is unclear as to whether the expiration clause applies to the City s ordinance. A reasonable argument can be made that the clause does not apply; however, in an abundance of caution it is recommended that this ordinance be reauthorized. The City s intention, based on the interpretation that the 1% fee does not expire, is to continue to collect the 1% fee, even if there is a gap between the expiration of a particular franchise and this reauthorization. Pacific Bell Telephone Company d/b/a AT&T California (AT&T) received a State video franchise to operate within the City on March 30, 2007. This franchise will expire on March 30, 2017. Assuming the expiration clause does apply to the City s ordinance, the City s PEG fee imposed on AT&T therefore would expire on March 30, 2017, unless the City Council reauthorizes the fee. Moreover, Time Warner NY Cable LLC d/b/a/ Time Warner Cable (Time Warner) received the second State video franchise to operate within the City on January 2, 2008. This franchise will expire on January 2, 2018. Assuming the expiration clause does apply to the City s ordinance, the City s PEG fee imposed on Time Warner therefore would expire on January 2, 2018, unless the City Council reauthorizes the fee. Because authority for State franchises lies with the State, the City might not be made aware in a timely manner of additional franchises whose franchise with the State may be expiring. Inasmuch as each State video franchise expires independently on different dates; and to prevent a lapse in the authorization to collect PEG access fees; therefore, the City continually authorizes the 1% PEG access fee collection pursuant to California Public Utilities Code Section 5870 for all State video franchises that operate in the City, regardless of the franchise expiration dates, and regardless whether a State video franchise currently operates within the City.

3 FINANCIAL IMPACT The proposed ordinance would reauthorize the City s PEG fee and therefore preserve funding available to support PEG programming facilities. For Fiscal Year 2015-16, PEG fees amounted to $132,300. If the City Council does not reauthorize the PEG access support fee, there is some risk that the City will not receive further PEG access fees from video service providers operating under State franchises within the City. The following alternatives are available to the City Council: 1. Introduce the attached ordinance to reauthorize the fee to support the PEG access channel facilities. 2. Do not introduce the attached ordinance to reauthorize the fee to support the PEG access channel facilities Staff recommends Alternative No. 1. SUGGESTED CITY COUNCIL MOTION I move to introduce Ordinance No. 1269 for first reading. SUMMARY In accordance with State law, the City imposes a 1% Public, Educational, and Governmental (PEG) access support fee on all state-franchised video service providers operating within the City to support PEG programming facilities. Unless this ordinance is reauthorized, there is a risk that the 1% PEG access fee imposed on AT&T will expire on March 30, 2017, and the 1% PEG access fee imposed on Time Warner will expire on January 2, 2018. The proposed ordinance would reauthorize the City s PEG fee and therefore preserve funding available to support PEG programming facilities. Sommer Barwick, Director Prepared by: Anna Medina, Deputy Community Services Director INDEX Page Ordinance....4

4 ORDINANCE NO. 1269 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SIMI VALLEY REAUTHORIZING THE FEE TO SUPPORT THE CITY S PUBLIC, EDUCATIONAL, AND GOVERNMENTAL (PEG) ACCESS CHANNEL FACILITIES WHEREAS, Section 5870(n) of the Public Utilities Code, which was enacted as part of the Digital Infrastructure and Video Competition Act of 2006, authorized the City to adopt an ordinance establishing a fee on state-franchised video service providers to support Public, Educational, and Governmental (PEG) access channel facilities; and WHEREAS, the City adopted an ordinance establishing such a fee, which is codified in Section 5-10.19 of the Municipal Code; and WHEREAS, some municipalities throughout the state have reached the conclusion that ordinances authorized under Section 5870(n) of the Public Utilities Code shall expire, and may be reauthorized, upon the expiration of a state franchise, although a reasonable interpretation is that the 1% PEG fee does not expire; and WHEREAS, in an abundance of caution the City wishes to unambiguously reauthorize the PEG fee, although it may not be necessary; and WHEREAS, the first state franchise to include the City, California Video Franchise Certificate Franchise No. 0002 granted to Pacific Bell Telephone Company d/b/a AT&T California (AT&T), will expire on March 30, 2017; and WHEREAS, the second state franchise to include the City, California Video Franchise Certificate Franchise No. 0005 granted to Time Warner NY Cable LLC d/b/a/ Time Warner Cable (Time Warner), will expire on January 2, 2018. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SIMI VALLEY DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. Municipal Code Section 5-10.19 is amended to add a new subsection (d), which will read as follows: The City s interpretation of Section 5870(n) of the Public Utilities Code is that the 1% fee to support PEG channel facilities authorized by that code section does not expire upon the expiration of any particular state franchise holder. However, to the extent any court or reviewing authority finds otherwise, City Council hereby reauthorizes the fee on state-franchised video service providers to support Public, Educational, and Governmental access channel facilities, referenced in subsection (b), above, which fee shall remain unchanged and in full effect as to all state-franchised video service providers. SR4-Programs & Facilities Ordinance

5 ORD. NO. 1269 City Council hereby reauthorizes the fee on the following state-franchised video service providers to support Public, Educational, and Governmental access channel facilities, referenced in subsection (b), above, which fee shall remain unchanged and in full effect as to: (1) Pacific Bell Telephone Company d/b/a AT&T California (Franchise No. 0002), scheduled to expire on March 30, 2017; and, (2) Time Warner NY Cable LLC d/b/a/ Time Warner Cable (Franchise No. 0005), scheduled to expire on January 2, 2018. City Council hereby reauthorizes the fee on any additional statefranchised video service providers that will be operating in the City of Simi Valley to support Public, Educational, and Governmental access channel facilities, referenced in subsection (b), upon the expiration of that state franchise, which fee shall remain unchanged and in full effect. SECTION 2. If any section, subsection, subdivision, sentence, clause, phrase or portion of this Ordinance or the application thereof to any person or place, is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the final decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, the remainder of this Ordinance shall remain in full force and effect. SECTION 3. The City Clerk shall cause this ordinance or a summary hereof to be published in a newspaper of general circulation, published in the County of Ventura and circulated in the City, and if applicable, to be posted, in accordance with Section 36933 of the California Government Code; shall certify to the adoption of this ordinance and shall cause a certified copy of this ordinance, together with proof of publication, to be filed in the Office of the Clerk of this City. SECTION 4. This ordinance shall go into effect and be in full force and effect at 12:01 a.m. on the thirty-first (31st) day after its passage. Attest: PASSED and ADOPTED this Ky Spangler, Deputy Director/City Clerk Approved as to Form: Robert O. Huber, Mayor of the City of Simi Valley, California Approved as to Content: Lonnie J. Eldridge, City Attorney Eric J. Levitt, City Manager SR4-Programs & Facilities Ordinance Sommer Barwick, Director