Strategies to Attract and Retain Immigrants in U.S. Metropolitan Areas Dr. Marie Price George Washington University
Why are local governments concerned about immigrant settlement and creating welcoming cities? What is the relationship between globalization, economic inequality, and growing diversity in the US? In what ways are immigrants contributing to the demographic and economic growth of cities?
International Migrant Stock 1990-2015, UN Population Division 300 000 000 250 000 000 200 000 000 150 000 000 World Developed Regions Developing Regions 100 000 000 50 000 000 0 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 2015
International Migrant Stock as % of the Total Population World Developed Regions Developing Regions 10.7 11.2 9.7 8.7 7.9 7.2 2.9 2.8 2.8 2.9 3.2 3.3 1.7 1.5 1.4 1.4 1.6 1.7 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 2015
Up to 23 Cities with over 1 million Foreign-Born Residents
Policy Literature
Web Sources: http://citiesofmigration.ca/
Gateway Characteristics Gateways act as Turnstiles Gateways are often Hyper-diverse localities Gateways as Sites Exclusion, Inclusion and Expulsion Gateways as settings experiencing rapid demographic change
Metro Seattle 2005
Metro Seattle 2015 650,000 FB
Foreign-Born in Washington
Cities Welcoming Immigrants It can be argued that the most forwardthinking U.S. cities are viewing immigrant retention and inclusion as a path to creating successful and sustainable places. The U.S. has over 41 million foreign-born residents, representing 13% of the total population.
Why do localities, especially cities, seek immigrants? Reverse Demographic Decline Increase competitiveness more skilled workers (H1B and F Visas) Stimulate entrepreneurship the diversity advantage argument Reduce Poverty and Support Housing Markets Respond to the Failure of the Federal Government to implement immigration reform Address needs of public safety and access to services (local identification cards) Integration of diverse groups is not easy, and cities need to be intentional when creating inclusive strategies and policies.
Multi-Scaler Hierarchy of Relationships Cities are nested in a hierarchy of relationships that extend down to immigrant-led businesses and neighborhood initiatives, and extend up to state and federal laws that influence what actions can be taken regarding immigrants. Key Federal Legislation includes: Birthright citizenship Privileging Family Reunification and Employment-based Sponsorship Mandatory Access to public education through the age of 18 regardless of immigration status. No Child Left Behind and LEP children/adults Anti-discrimination and Civil Rights legislation since the 1960s. Yet the U.S is without an explicit national immigrant integration policy, which is distinct from other major immigrant destinations in the world.
Why Do Immigrants Engage in Entrepreneurship? Enclave thesis entrepreneurship stems from the demands for goods and services from a concentrated immigrant community. Block Mobility thesis immigrants create their own jobs/economy because they have been limited in some way the the host society s employment structure Diversity Advantage thesis highlights the social capital and transnational connections of highly skilled migrants as agents for development.
The U.S. has over 41 million foreign-born residents, representing 13% of the total population.
From 2000 to 2009 the five largest immigrant gateways (New York City, Los Angeles, Miami, Chicago and San Francisco) lost more people due to internal migration than they gained.
Continuous Gateways: New York City, Chicago and San Francisco Cities that have been continuous immigrant destinations such as New York City and Chicago, typically have the most developed formal out reach centers. Moreover, leaders of these cities view immigrant integration as critical to the overall health of these places. They have led many national initiatives such as Cities for Citizenship and New Partnership for America. Mayor s Office of Immigrant Affairs (MOIA) in NYC Office of New Americans in Chicago Office of Civic Engagement and Immigrant Affairs (OCEIA) These one-stop agencies have multi lingual websites that provide the necessary information that immigrants need to settle in an area and even establish businesses. San Francisco made a Photo ID available in 2009. Mayor de Blasio signed a Municipal ID bill to help immigrants access services and open bank accounts in 2014. San Francisco was a leader in the sanctuary policy, which began in 1985 in response to the rise in Central American Refugees. Chicago Federal Reserve created an Islam friendly lending program to assist Muslims in home buying without violating religious prohibitions against paying or receiving interest.
Metropolit an Area Immigrant Population 2009 Percent Immigrant 2009 Immigrant Population 2013 Percent Immigrant 2013 Skill Type New York 5,271,238 27.6 5,564,296 28.2 Balanced Chicago 1,645,920 17.2 1,669,830 17.6 Balanced San Francisco 1,273,780 29.5 1,310,790 29.8 High
Former Gateways: Baltimore, Detroit, and Pittsburgh Leaders in these destinations have developed programs with the intent to attract and retain immigrants. Their motivations are to stem population loss and to stimulate economic activity, especially immigrant led businesses. Newcomers are also seen as agents to revitalize the housing market in these post-industrial cites. They have attracted more high skill workers. What is noted is a significant change in tone, in which immigrants are viewed as positive drivers of change Global Detroit Initiative (2010) an affirmative immigrant-welcoming and global-connection building effort Welcome Mat Detroit a website with immigrant services. Global Talent Retention Initiative focused on retaining international students trains in Michigan. Coordinating with Michigan Office of New Americans to recruit refugees, international students and foreign investors. Baltimore mayor signed a sanctuary-type ordinance in 2012. Mayor set goal to attract 10,000 immigrant families over the decade. Welcome Pittsburgh, aims for 20,000 new residents in the city. Civic Leadership Academy that recruits immigrant business owners and community leaders. Allegheny County created an Immigrant and International Advisory Council in 2007.
Former Gateways Metropolita n Area Immigrant Population 2009 Percent Immigrant 2009 Immigrant Population 2013 Percent Immigrant 2013 Detroit 393,499 8.9 379,498 8.8 High Skill Level Baltimore 222,678 8.3 252,752 9.2 High Pittsburgh 70,918 3.0 88,999 3.8 High
(Re)Emerging Gateways: Atlanta, Washington DC, and Minneapolis-St. Paul These metropolitan areas experienced rapid growth in the foreign-born since 1980. With a sudden influx of immigrants, supporting institutions needed to be created. With the exception of refugee resettlement, most of these localities did not have explicit strategies to attract or settle new arrivals. The sudden demographic change in these areas also provoked backlash, especially regarding concern over the unauthorized. Counties or states in these areas all participated in 287(g) agreements. These metro areas lack a centralized institution for immigrant welcoming, although their are diverse country and civil society organization Washington: Case de Maryland and the Latino Economic Development Corporation (LEDC) outreach to small businesses. Office of African Affairs in DC. Suburban counties have substantial outreach programs in Arlington, Alexandria, Fairfax, Montgomery and Prince George s Counties. Atlanta Mayor Kasim Reed formed the Welcoming Atlanta Working Group in 2014 to reduce barriers to civic participation. Minneapolis-St. Paul African development Center created in 2003. Minnesota Business Immigration Coalition.
(Re)Emerging Gateways Metropolita n Area Immigrant Population 2009 Percent Immigrant 2009 Immigrant Population 2013 Percent Immigrant 2013 Washington 1,103,271 20.1 1,245,847 21.6 High Skill Level Atlanta 713,333 13.0 720,964 13.4 Balanced Minneapolis 296,932 9.1 323,423 9.5 High
Strategies for Inclusion and Retention Outreach: city leaders and city institutions need to make an effort to communicate with immigrant groups through the use of multiple languages, multi-media programs that include web sites, and coordination with community-based organizations. Data: know your immigrant populations, where they reside, how they are organized, and develop benchmarks for measuring their levels of social and economic integration. Leadership: local leaders need to make immigrant inclusion a priority, with mayors often setting the tone if a city will be welcoming or not. The corollary is also true, if local leaders actively deflect immigrant groups from particular areas, they tend not to settle there or to leave. Participation: development of immigrant advisory boards, exposure to local governance, contacts with immigrant organizations, and the promotion of naturalization all enhance civic participation of immigrants.
Welcoming Cities Movement Huang and Liu, 2016
Huang and Liu, 2016
Huang and Liu, 2016
The Undocumented Pew Research Nov 3, 2016
Spaces of Sanctuary Geographies of Tolerance Sanctuary Cities--39 New York Times 11-29-16
The Trump Effect Removals (Deportations) will become much more visible and some wall construction will occur. (Yet the Obama administration was removing 1,000 unauthorized migrants a day) The fate of the DACA holders will be the pivotal decision for this presidency. Detention Centers will grow, most are privately run Refugee resettlement will likely decline International Student flows and numbers are likely to decline, or at least shift. Immigration from Latin America, especially irregular flows, will likely decline. More resistance at the state and local levels to policy changes.
Thank you Dr. Marie Price George Washington University mprice@gwu.edu