Most are skeptical Trump will act to block future Russian meddling

Similar documents
the Poor and the Middle Class

FOR RELEASE MAY 10, 2018

RECOMMENDED CITATION: Pew Research Center, March, 2017, Large Majorities See Checks and Balances, Right to Protest as Essential for Democracy

Growing share of public says there is too little focus on race issues

FOR RELEASE AUGUST 4, 2017

PEW RESEARCH CENTER. FOR RELEASE January 16, 2019 FOR MEDIA OR OTHER INQUIRIES:

pewwww.pewresearch.org

Republicans views of FBI have grown more negative in past year

RECOMMENDED CITATION: Pew Research Center, February, 2017, In Trump Era, What Partisans Want From Their Congressional Leaders

FOR RELEASE NOVEMBER 07, 2017

RECOMMENDED CITATION: Pew Research Center, August, 2016, On Immigration Policy, Partisan Differences but Also Some Common Ground

FOR RELEASE October 1, 2018

RECOMMENDED CITATION: Pew Research Center, May, 2017, Public Trust in Government Remains Near Historic Lows as Partisan Attitudes Shift

FOR RELEASE DECEMBER 14, 2017

NUMBERS, FACTS AND TRENDS SHAPING THE WORLD FOR RELEASE AUGUST 26, 2016 FOR MEDIA OR OTHER INQUIRIES:

FOR RELEASE July 17, 2018

FOR RELEASE MAY 3, 2018

FOR RELEASE DECEMBER 07, 2017

RECOMMENDED CITATION: Pew Research Center, May, 2015, Free Trade Agreements Seen as Good for U.S., But Concerns Persist

RECOMMENDED CITATION: Pew Research Center, October, 2015, On Immigration Policy, Wider Partisan Divide Over Border Fence Than Path to Legal Status

RECOMMENDED CITATION: Pew Research Center, February, 2015, Growing Support for Campaign Against ISIS - and Possible Use of U.S.

RECOMMENDED CITATION: Pew Research Center, June, 2015, Broad Public Support for Legal Status for Undocumented Immigrants

RECOMMENDED CITATION: Pew Research Center, March, 2015, More Approve Than Disapprove of Iran Talks, But Most Think Iranians Are Not Serious

RECOMMENDED CITATION: Pew Research Center, July, 2015, Iran Nuclear Agreement Meets With Public Skepticism

RECOMMENDED CITATION: Pew Research Center, February 2014, Public Divided over Increased Deportation of Unauthorized Immigrants

Most Say Immigration Policy Needs Big Changes

Most opponents reject hearings no matter whom Obama nominates

GOP Seen as Principled, But Out of Touch and Too Extreme

FOR RELEASE AUGUST 16, 2018

RECOMMENDED CITATION: Pew Research Center, May, 2015, Public Continues to Back U.S. Drone Attacks

RECOMMENDED CITATION: Pew Research Center, July, 2015, Negative Views of Supreme Court at Record High, Driven by Republican Dissatisfaction

Supreme Court s Favorability Edges Below 50%

BY Cary Funk and Lee Rainie

FOR RELEASE SEPTEMBER 13, 2018

RECOMMENDED CITATION: Pew Research Center, September, 2015, Majority Says Any Budget Deal Must Include Planned Parenthood Funding

RECOMMENDED CITATION: Pew Research Center, May, 2015, Republicans Early Views of GOP Field More Positive than in 2012, 2008 Campaigns

Public Remains Opposed to Arming Syrian Rebels

FOR RELEASE October 18, 2018

RECOMMENDED CITATION: Pew Research Center, February, 2015, Democrats Have More Positive Image, But GOP Runs Even or Ahead on Key Issues

NUMBERS, FACTS AND TRENDS SHAPING THE WORLD FOR RELEASE AUGUST 25, 2014 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION ON THIS REPORT:

Obama Maintains Approval Advantage, But GOP Runs Even on Key Issues

Borders First a Dividing Line in Immigration Debate

FOR RELEASE JANUARY 18, 2018

RECOMMENDED CITATION: Pew Research Center, May, 2017, Partisan Identification Is Sticky, but About 10% Switched Parties Over the Past Year

Public Remains Supportive of Israel, Wary of Iran

RECOMMENDED CITATION: Pew Research Center, March 2014, Concerns about Russia Rise, But Just a Quarter Call Moscow an Adversary

RECOMMENDED CITATION: Pew Research Center, May, 2015, Negative Views of New Congress Cross Party Lines

Opposition to Syrian Airstrikes Surges

Record Number Favors Removing U.S. Troops from Afghanistan

NUMBERS, FACTS AND TRENDS SHAPING THE WORLD. FOR RELEASE September 12, 2014 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION ON THIS REPORT:

Any Court Health Care Decision Unlikely to Please

RECOMMENDED CITATION: Pew Research Center, September 2014, Growing Public Concern about Rise of Islamic Extremism At Home and Abroad

RECOMMENDED CITATION: Pew Research Center, July, 2014, Most Think the U.S. Has No Responsibility to Act in Iraq

Supreme Court Approval Rating Drops to 25-Year Low

Continued Support for U.S. Drone Strikes

On Eve of Foreign Debate, Growing Pessimism about Arab Spring Aftermath

FOR RELEASE OCT. 2, 2018

Little Support for U.S. Intervention in Syrian Conflict

Public Views of Congress Recover Slightly REPUBLICANS LESS POSITIVE TOWARD SUPREME COURT

State Governments Viewed Favorably as Federal Rating Hits New Low

For Voters It s Still the Economy

FOR RELEASE MARCH 20, 2018

PEW RESEARCH CENTER FOR MEDIA OR OTHER INQUIRIES:

FOR RELEASE NOVEMBER 8, 2013 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION ON THIS REPORT:

Continued Support for Keystone XL Pipeline

Republicans Are Losing Ground on the Deficit, But Obama s Not Gaining

PEW RESEARCH CENTER. FOR RELEASE December 17, 2018 FOR MEDIA OR OTHER INQUIRIES:

FOR RELEASE November 29, 2018

No Change in Views of Torture, Warrantless Wiretaps OBAMA FACES FAMILIAR DIVISIONS OVER ANTI-TERROR POLICIES

RECOMMENDED CITATION: Pew Research Center, January, 2015, Public s Policy Priorities Reflect Changing Conditions At Home and Abroad

GOP leads on economy, Democrats on health care, immigration

Partisans Dug in on Budget, Health Care Impasse

RECOMMENDED CITATION: Pew Research Center, July, 2016, In Clinton s March to Nomination, Many Democrats Changed Their Minds

Despite Years of Terror Scares, Public s Concerns Remain Fairly Steady

But Most See Possible Taliban Takeover as Major Threat PUBLIC SUPPORT FOR AFGHAN MISSION SLIPS

NUMBERS, FACTS AND TRENDS SHAPING THE WORLD FOR RELEASE DECEMBER 8, 2014 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION ON THIS REPORT:

Obama Viewed as Fiscal Cliff Victor; Legislation Gets Lukewarm Reception

NUMBERS, FACTS AND TRENDS SHAPING THE WORLD FOR RELEASE JANUARY 20, 2015 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION ON THIS REPORT:

RECOMMENDED CITATION: Pew Research Center, October, 2016, Trump, Clinton supporters differ on how media should cover controversial statements

Tea Party s Image Turns More Negative

BY Galen Stocking and Nami Sumida

Fewer Are Angry at Government, But Discontent Remains High

RECOMMENDED CITATION: Pew Research Center, January 2015, Terrorism Worries Little Changed; Most Give Government Good Marks for Reducing Threat

BY Aaron Smith FOR RELEASE JUNE 28, 2018 FOR MEDIA OR OTHER INQUIRIES:

Pew Research News IQ Quiz What the Public Knows about the Political Parties

RECOMMENDED CITATION: Pew Research Center, March 2014, Most Say U.S. Should Not Get Too Involved in Ukraine Situation

Energy Concerns Fall, Deficit Concerns Rise PUBLIC S PRIORITIES FOR 2010: ECONOMY, JOBS, TERRORISM

FAVORABLE RATINGS OF LABOR UNIONS FALL SHARPLY

Partisan Interest, Reactions to IRS and AP Controversies

RECOMMENDED CITATION: Pew Research Center, December, 2016, Low Approval of Trump s Transition but Outlook for His Presidency Improves

FOR RELEASE October 15, 2018

As Debt Limit Deadline Nears, Concern Ticks Up but Skepticism Persists Despite Image Problems, GOP Holds Ground on Key Issues

RECOMMENDED CITATION: Pew Research Center, November, 2016, A Divided and Pessimistic Electorate

Voters Divided Over Who Will Win Second Debate

Well Known: Clinton and Gadhafi Little Known: Who Controls Congress

RECOMMENDED CITATION: Pew Research Center, July, 2016, 2016 Campaign: Strong Interest, Widespread Dissatisfaction

Majority of Republicans Say U.S. Is Less Respected MORE SEE AMERICA S LOSS OF GLOBAL RESPECT AS MAJOR PROBLEM

1 PEW RESEARCH CENTER

Public Wants Debt Ceiling Compromise, Expects a Deal Before Deadline

FOR RELEASE APRIL 26, 2018

Transcription:

FOR RELEASE MARCH 15, 2018 Public Confidence in Mueller s Investigation Remains Steady Most are skeptical Trump will act to block future Russian meddling FOR MEDIA OR OTHER INQUIRIES: Carroll Doherty, Director of Political Research Jocelyn Kiley, Associate Director, Research Olivia O Hea, Communications Assistant 202.419.4372 RECOMMENDED CITATION Pew Research Center, March, 2018, Public Confidence in Mueller s Investigation Remains Steady

About Pew Research Center Pew Research Center is a nonpartisan fact tank that informs the public about the issues, attitudes and trends shaping America and the world. It does not take policy positions. It conducts public opinion polling, demographic research, content analysis and other data-driven social science research. The Center studies U.S. politics and policy; journalism and media; internet, science and technology; religion and public life; Hispanic trends; global attitudes and trends; and U.S. social and demographic trends. All of the Center s reports are available at. Pew Research Center is a subsidiary of The Pew Charitable Trusts, its primary funder. Pew Research Center 2018

Public Confidence in Mueller s Investigation Remains Steady Most are skeptical Trump will act to block future Russian meddling The public continues to express at least some confidence that Robert Mueller will conduct a fair investigation into Russia s involvement in the 2016 election. A majority of Americans (61%) say they are very or somewhat confident Mueller will conduct a fair investigation; these views have changed only modestly since December. Most Americans are very or somewhat While opinions about Mueller s probe and confident Mueller s probe will be fair other issues related to Russia s alleged election % who are confident that special counsel Robert meddling are divided along partisan lines, Mueller will conduct a fair investigation into Russian nearly half of Republicans and Republicanleaning involvement in the 2016 election independents (46%) are very or Very Somewhat Not too Not at all somewhat confident Mueller will conduct a Total 25 36 19 18 fair investigation. Democrats and Democratic leaners are overwhelmingly confident % who say Russian efforts to influence the 2016 election Mueller s investigation will be fair (75% very benefited campaign or somewhat confident). Trump Clinton Neither The latest national survey by Pew Research Center, conducted March 7-14 among 1,466 adults, finds the public is skeptical that the Trump administration will make a serious effort to prevent Russia from influencing future U.S. elections. (The survey was conducted before the administration s March 15 announcement it was imposing sanctions on Russia in response to its interference in the 2016 campaign.) Total Total 43 4 48 % who are confident that the Trump administration will make a serious effort to prevent Russia from influencing future U.S. elections Very Somewhat Not too Not at all 21 21 19 36 Note: Don t know responses not shown. Source: Survey of U.S. adults conducted March 7-14, 2018. About four-in-ten Americans (42%) are very or somewhat confident that the administration will make a serious effort to thwart Russian efforts to influence future elections. Most are not too confident (19%) or not at all confident (36%) the Trump administration will take serious action to prevent Russia from influencing future elections in this country.

2 The survey finds that the public is divided in opinions about the ultimate impact of Russian efforts to influence the 2016 presidential election: 48% say these efforts did not benefit either Trump or Hillary Clinton, while 43% say they benefited Trump. Very few Americans (4%) think Russian actions benefited Clinton. Trump s job approval has changed little in recent months. Currently, 39% approve of the way Trump is handling his job as president, while 54% disapprove. (Also new today: Disagreements about Trump widely seen as reflecting divides over other values and goals.)

3 Most are at least somewhat confident in fairness of Mueller s investigation Overall, more Americans (61%) say they are very or somewhat confident that Justice Department special counsel Robert Mueller will conduct a fair investigation into Russia s involvement in the 2016 election; 37% are not too confident or not at all confident that he will do this. Among Democrats and Democratic-leaning independents, 39% are very confident Mueller will pursue a fair investigation, while another 36% are somewhat confident. Just 23% of Democrats are not too confident or not at all confident. Democrats confidence in Mueller s investigation has increased; Republicans views are little changed % who are confident that special counsel Robert Mueller will conduct a fair investigation into Russian involvement in the 2016 election Not at all Not too Somewhat Very 16 16 20 21 18 19 30 29 36 25 27 25 25 27 26 25 21 24 30 30 35 14 15 11 10 8 16 21 31 27 8 15 36 37 38 39 Dec Jan Mar Dec Jan Mar Dec Jan Mar Total Rep/Lean Rep Dem/Lean Dem Note: Don t know responses not shown. Source: Survey of U.S. adults conducted March 7-14, 2018. The share of Democrats who are at least somewhat confident Mueller will conduct a fair investigation into Russia s election involvement has risen modestly since December, from 68% then to 75% today. By contrast, opinions among Republicans and Republican leaners are virtually unchanged from three months ago. About a quarter of Republicans say they are not at all confident (26%) that Mueller will conduct a fair investigation; 24% are not too confident, while 46% say they are at least somewhat confident Mueller will conduct a fair investigation into Russian election involvement.

4 Republicans say Russian efforts in 2016 didn t benefit either candidate The public is split on whether Russian efforts to influence the 2016 election benefited Donald Trump s campaign or neither campaign very much. Roughly equal shares say that Russian Wide partisan gap in views of impact of efforts likely benefited Trump s campaign Russian efforts to influence election (43%) or neither of the campaigns (48%) with % who say Russian efforts to influence the 2016 election sharp divisions by party. Just 4% say Russian benefited campaign efforts benefited Hillary Clinton s campaign. Trump Clinton Neither Three-quarters of Republicans and Republican leaners say that Russia s meddling didn t benefit either campaign very much. A nearly identical share of Democrats and Democratic Total 43 Among Rep/Lean Rep Total 14 7 4 75 48 leaners (74%) say it benefited Trump s Conserv 7 9 79 campaign. Mod/Lib 27 4 66 There are ideological differences in both parties in these views. Over a quarter (27%) of moderate and liberal Republicans say the Trump campaign benefited from Russian influence in the campaign, compared with just 7% of conservative Republicans. Among Dem/Lean Dem Total Cons/Mod Liberal 74 68 82 1 1 23 29 Note: Don t know responses not shown. Source: Survey of U.S. adults conducted March 7-14, 2018. 14 Among Democrats, majorities of liberals (82%) and conservatives and moderates (68%) say the Trump campaign benefited from Russian efforts to influence the 2016 election.

5 There also are sizable differences between parties and wide ideological differences within each on whether the Trump administration had improper contact with Russia during the 2016 campaign. Overall, 58% of the public say senior members of the Trump administration likely had improper contact with Russia during the 2016 campaign, including 25% who say they definitely did and 33% who say they probably did. As with views of Mueller s investigation, these opinions are relatively unchanged since December. Parties divided ideologically in views of Trump campaign contacts with Russia % who say senior members of Trump administration have improper contact with Russia during 2016 campaign Total Definitely did Probably did NOT 25 33 Probably did Definitely did NOT 22 17 An overwhelming share of Democrats (88%) Among Rep/Lean Rep says that improper contact probably (45%) or Total 6 20 40 31 definitely (43%) occurred. Liberal Democrats Conserv 2 12 43 40 (54%) are far more likely than conservative and moderate Democrats (33%) to say such contacts definitely took place. Mod/Lib 11 34 Among Dem/Lean Dem Total 43 37 45 14 7 4 By contrast, seven-in-ten Republicans (71%) say that senior members of the Trump administration probably or definitely did not have improper contact with Russia. While 40% of conservative Republicans say improper campaign contacts between senior Trump officials and Russia definitely did not occur, just 14% of moderate and liberal Republicans say the same. Cons/Mod Liberal 33 54 50 39 Note: Don t know responses not shown. Source: Survey of U.S. adults conducted March 7-14, 2018. 8 7 4

6 Most are not confident administration will make serious effort to prevent future Russian interference A majority of Americans (56%) say they are not confident that the Trump administration will make a serious effort to prevent Russia from influencing future U.S. elections. Roughly four-in-ten (42%) say they are very or somewhat confident that the administration will take serious action in this regard. Democrats especially liberals are deeply skeptical that the White House will make serious efforts to block Russia from intervening in future elections. A large majority of liberal Democrats (70%), along with about half (51%) of the party s conservatives and moderates, say they are not at all confident the administration will make serious efforts. Democrats skeptical White House will prevent future Russian meddling % who are confident the Trump administration will make a serious effort to prevent Russia from influencing future U.S. elections Total Total 21 Among Rep/Lean Rep Conserv Mod/Lib 26 Among Dem/Lean Dem Total 5 10 Very Somewhat Not too Not at all 38 44 25 21 28 19 35 38 22 60 36 13 8 22 12 6 Most Republicans (73%) are very or somewhat confident that the administration will make a serious effort to block future election involvement by Russia. However, just 38% are very confident the White House will take serious action, including 44% of conservatives and 26% of moderates and liberals. Cons/Mod 7 Liberal 1 7 12 19 30 70 51 Note: Don t know responses not shown. Source: Survey of U.S. adults conducted March 7-14, 2018.

7 Acknowledgements This report is a collaborative effort based on the input and analysis of the following individuals: Research team Carroll Doherty, Director, Political Research Jocelyn Kiley, Associate Director, Political Research Alec Tyson, Senior Researcher Bradley Jones, Research Associate Baxter Oliphant, Research Associate Hannah Fingerhut, Research Analyst Hannah Hartig, Research Analyst Aldo Iturrios, Intern Communications and editorial Bridget Johnson, Communications Associate Olivia O Hea, Communications Assistant Graphic design and web publishing Peter Bell, Design Director Alissa Scheller, Information Graphics Designer

8 Methodology The analysis in this report is based on telephone interviews conducted March 7-14, 2018 among a national sample of 1,466 adults, 18 years of age or older, living in all 50 U.S. states and the District of Columbia (384 respondents were interviewed on a landline telephone, and 1,082 were interviewed on a cell phone, including 653 who had no landline telephone). The survey was conducted under the direction of ICF Incorporated. A combination of landline and cell phone random digit dial samples were used; both samples were provided by Marketing Systems Group. Interviews were conducted in English and Spanish. Respondents in the landline sample were selected by randomly asking for the youngest adult male or female who is now at home. Interviews in the cell sample were conducted with the person who answered the phone, if that person was an adult 18 years of age or older. For detailed information about our survey methodology, see http:///methodology/u-s-survey-research/ The combined landline and cell phone sample are weighted using an iterative technique that matches gender, age, education, race, Hispanic origin and nativity and region to parameters from the 2016 Census Bureau's American Community Survey and population density to parameters from the Decennial Census. The sample also is weighted to match current patterns of telephone status (landline only, cell phone only, or both landline and cell phone), based on extrapolations from the 2016 National Health Interview Survey. The weighting procedure also accounts for the fact that respondents with both landline and cell phones have a greater probability of being included in the combined sample and adjusts for household size among respondents with a landline phone. The margins of error reported and statistical tests of significance are adjusted to account for the survey s design effect, a measure of how much efficiency is lost from the weighting procedures.

9 The following table shows the unweighted sample sizes and the error attributable to sampling that would be expected at the 95% level of confidence for different groups in the survey: Survey conducted March 7-14, 2018 Unweighted Group sample size Plus or minus Total sample 1,466 3.0 percentage points Republican/Lean Rep 655 4.5 percentage points Democrat/Lean Dem 682 4.4 percentage points Sample sizes and sampling errors for other subgroups are available upon request. In addition to sampling error, one should bear in mind that question wording and practical difficulties in conducting surveys can introduce error or bias into the findings of opinion polls. Pew Research Center undertakes all polling activity, including calls to mobile telephone numbers, in compliance with the Telephone Consumer Protection Act and other applicable laws. Pew Research Center is a nonprofit, tax-exempt 501(c)(3) organization and a subsidiary of The Pew Charitable Trusts, its primary funder. Pew Research Center, 2018

10 MARCH 2018 POLITICAL SURVEY FINAL TOPLINE MARCH 7-14, 2018 N=1,466 QUESTIONS 1, 7, 12, 14-15, 24-27, 40, 46-47 HELD FOR FUTURE RELEASE QUESTIONS 2, 41-42 PREVIOUSLY RELEASED NO QUESTIONS 3-6, 8-11, 13, 16-23, 28-39, 43-45 ASK ALL: Q.48 How much, if anything, have you read or heard about Russian efforts to influence the 2016 presidential election? [READ] Mar 7-14 2018 TREND FOR COMPARISON Jan 10-15 2018 1 61 A lot 55 26 A little 33 12 Nothing at all 11 1 Don t know/refused (VOL.) 1 ASK ALL: Q.49 Do you think Russian efforts to influence the 2016 election [READ AND RANDOMIZE OPTIONS 1 AND 2 WITH OPTION 3 ALWAYS LAST]? Mar 7-14 2018 43 Benefited Donald Trump s campaign 4 Benefited Hillary Clinton s campaign 48 Didn t benefit either one very much * Russia did not try to influence election (VOL.) 4 Don t know/refused (VOL.) ASK ALL: Q.50 How confident are you that the Trump administration will make a serious effort to prevent Russia from influencing future U.S. elections? Are you [READ IN ORDER]? Mar 7-14 2018 21 Very confident 21 Somewhat confident 19 Not too confident 36 Not at all confident 2 Don t know/refused (VOL.) QUESTIONS 51-53, 55, 59, 61, 63, 90 HELD FOR FUTURE RELEASE NO QUESTIONS 54, 56-58, 60, 62, 64-89, 91-93 1 In the January 10-15, 2018 survey, question was worded: How much, if anything, have you read or heard about the investigation into Russian involvement in the 2016 election?

11 ASK ALL: Q.94 Thinking about the investigation into Russian involvement in the 2016 election just your impression, do you think senior members of the Trump administration definitely did, probably did, probably did NOT or definitely did NOT have improper contact with Russia during the 2016 presidential campaign? Mar 7-14 2018 Nov 29-Dec 4 2017 25 Definitely did 30 33 Probably did 29 22 Probably did not 18 17 Definitely did not 12 4 Don t know/refused (VOL.) 10 ASK ALL: Q.95 How confident, if at all, are you that the Justice Department special counsel Robert Mueller [PRONOUNCED: MULL-er ] will conduct a fair investigation into Russian involvement in the 2016 election [READ]? Mar 7-14 2018 Jan 10-15 2018 25 Very confident 27 25 36 Somewhat confident 29 30 19 Not too confident 21 20 18 Not at all confident 16 16 3 Don t know/refused (VOL.) 8 8 Nov 29-Dec 4 2017 ASK ALL: PARTY In politics TODAY, do you consider yourself a Republican, Democrat, or independent? ASK IF INDEP/NO PREF/OTHER/DK/REF (PARTY=3,4,5,9): PARTYLN As of today do you lean more to the Republican Party or more to the Democratic Party? (VOL.) (VOL.) No Other (VOL.) Lean Lean Republican Democrat Independent preference party DK/Ref Rep Dem Mar 7-14, 2018 26 28 41 3 * 1 17 18 Jan 10-15, 2018 26 33 34 3 1 3 12 18 Nov 29-Dec 4, 2017 20 32 40 4 1 3 13 19 Oct 25-30, 2017 22 32 41 3 1 2 17 19 Jun 8-Jul 9, 2017 25 31 39 3 1 2 16 18 Apr 5-11, 2017 24 31 42 2 1 * 17 20 Feb 7-12, 2017 23 34 37 3 1 2 15 18 Yearly Totals 2017 23.6 31.4 39.4 3.3.6 1.7 15.8 18.7 2016 25.4 32.0 36.5 3.4.5 2.2 14.6 17.0 2015 23.7 30.4 40.1 3.6.4 1.8 16.4 17.3 2014 23.2 31.5 39.5 3.1.7 2.0 16.2 16.5 2013 23.9 32.1 38.3 2.9.5 2.2 16.0 16.0 2012 24.7 32.6 36.4 3.1.5 2.7 14.4 16.1 2011 24.3 32.3 37.4 3.1.4 2.5 15.7 15.6 2010 25.2 32.7 35.2 3.6.4 2.8 14.5 14.1 2009 23.9 34.4 35.1 3.4.4 2.8 13.1 15.7 2008 25.7 36.0 31.5 3.6.3 3.0 10.6 15.2 2007 25.3 32.9 34.1 4.3.4 2.9 10.9 17.0 2006 27.8 33.1 30.9 4.4.3 3.4 10.5 15.1 2005 29.3 32.8 30.2 4.5.3 2.8 10.3 14.9 2004 30.0 33.5 29.5 3.8.4 3.0 11.7 13.4 2003 30.3 31.5 30.5 4.8.5 2.5 12.0 12.6 2002 30.4 31.4 29.8 5.0.7 2.7 12.4 11.6 2001 29.0 33.2 29.5 5.2.6 2.6 11.9 11.6 2001 Post-Sept 11 30.9 31.8 27.9 5.2.6 3.6 11.7 9.4

12 PARTY/PARTYLN CONTINUED (VOL.) (VOL.) No Other (VOL.) Lean Lean Republican Democrat Independent preference party DK/Ref Rep Dem 2001 Pre-Sept 11 27.3 34.4 30.9 5.1.6 1.7 12.1 13.5 2000 28.0 33.4 29.1 5.5.5 3.6 11.6 11.7 1999 26.6 33.5 33.7 3.9.5 1.9 13.0 14.5 1998 27.9 33.7 31.1 4.6.4 2.3 11.6 13.1 1997 28.0 33.4 32.0 4.0.4 2.3 12.2 14.1 1996 28.9 33.9 31.8 3.0.4 2.0 12.1 14.9 1995 31.6 30.0 33.7 2.4.6 1.3 15.1 13.5 1994 30.1 31.5 33.5 1.3 -- 3.6 13.7 12.2 1993 27.4 33.6 34.2 4.4 1.5 2.9 11.5 14.9 1992 27.6 33.7 34.7 1.5 0 2.5 12.6 16.5 1991 30.9 31.4 33.2 0 1.4 3.0 14.7 10.8 1990 30.9 33.2 29.3 1.2 1.9 3.4 12.4 11.3 1989 33 33 34 -- -- -- -- -- 1987 26 35 39 -- -- -- -- --