Comparative Legislative Politics

Similar documents
Comparing European Democracies Draft Syllabus

Comparing European Democracies

The Political System of the Federal Republic of Germany

Lanny W. Martin. MARK ALL CHANGES SINCE LAST YEAR ARE HIGHLIGHTED. Academic Appointments and Affiliations

Comparative Government: Political Institutions and Their Impact on the Political Process

POS 6933 Presidents, Prime Ministers, and Legislatures Department of Political Science University of Florida Spring Semester 2005

GOVT-GOVERNMENT (GOVT)

POLI 5140 Politics & Religion 3 cr.

The Politics of Parliamentary Debate

Political Science Graduate Program Class Schedule Spring 2014

POL-GA Comparative Government and Institutions New York University Spring 2017

Christopher Wratil CONTACT INFORMATION. Cologne Center for Comparative Politics University of Cologne Herbert-Lewin-Str Cologne Germany

Cecilia Martinez-Gallardo August Education

Christopher Wratil CONTACT INFORMATION. Cologne Center for Comparative Politics University of Cologne Herbert-Lewin-Str Cologne Germany

European Integration: Theory and Political Process

STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK AT ALBANY Rockefeller College of Public Affairs and Policy Department of Political Science

Department of Political Science Duke University

Jonathan B. Slapin. University of Essex Tel: +44 (0) Wivenhoe Park Colchester, CO4 3SQ United Kingdom

POLITICS AND GOVERNMENT (POL)

The Origins and transformation of European Welfare States (Bachelor course)

Rockefeller College, University at Albany, SUNY Department of Political Science Graduate Course Descriptions Spring 2019

PUBLIC POLICY AND PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION (PPPA)

Network Governance: Theories, Methods and Practices

Detailed program structure and contents for the M.A. Political Science

Zachary David Greene

Models of Capitalism (Master course)

Political Science Courses-1. American Politics

European Integration: Theory and Political Process

Political Science (PSCI)

Political Science Graduate Program Class Schedule - Spring 2016

MA International Relations Module Catalogue (September 2017)

Comparative Electoral Politics Spring 2008 Professor Orit Kedar Tuesday, Thursday, 3-4:30 Room E51-061

Resolutions of National Parliaments in EU affairs: The Crucial Role of Issue Entrepreneurs

Understand the basic concepts of European Union Law and differentiate the EU legal order from international and national legal orders.

EU INSTITUTIONS AND THE DECISION-MAKING PROCESS PART ONE

Do parties and voters pursue the same thing? Policy congruence between parties and voters on different electoral levels

Hande Mutlu-Eren. Department of Politics (646) West 4th St. 2nd floor New York, NY 10012

COMPARATIVE POLITICAL INSTITUTIONS Political Science 7972

Political Clientelism and the Quality of Public Policy

Executive-Legislative Politics

What criteria should guide electoral system choice?

Zoila Ponce de Leon. Phone: (919) Homepage:

PS489: Federalizing Europe? Structure and Behavior in Contemporary European Politics

Professor Dr. Thomas König: Selected Topics in International Politics: International Institutions: Understanding European Decision Making (IP)

David A. Hopkins. University of California, Berkeley Ph.D., Political Science, 2010 (dissertation chair: Eric Schickler) M.A., Political Science, 2002

CHINO VALLEY UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT INSTRUCTIONAL GUIDE UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT AND POLITICS ADVANCED PLACEMENT

Robin E. Best. 103 Professional Building Phone: University of Missouri Fax:

Despina Alexiadou. International Studies, Part-time Lecturer ( ).

Department of Political Science Graduate Course Descriptions Fall 2014

The Electoral Connection of Ministerial Selection in the UK

POLS 327: Congress and the Legislative Process (Fall 2014)

POLI239: Introduction to European Government Spring 2014 University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Department of Political Science

Australian and International Politics Subject Outline Stage 1 and Stage 2

Ideology, Grandstanding, and Strategic Party Disloyalty in British Parliament

Understanding Roll Call Vote Requests and their Consequences

Christopher Wratil. John F. Kennedy Memorial Fellow, Minda de Gunzburg Center for European Studies, Harvard University

Note: Principal version Equivalence list Modification Complete version from 1 October 2014 Master s Programme Sociology: Social and Political Theory

Inequality and Political Representation

From Spatial Distance to Programmatic Overlap: Elaboration and Application of an Improved Party Policy Measure

PSOC002 Democracy Term 1, Prof. Riccardo Pelizzo Raffles 3-19 Tel

Rockefeller College, University at Albany, SUNY Department of Political Science Graduate Course Descriptions Fall 2016

Political Science. Political Science-1. Faculty: Ball, Chair; Fair, Koch, Lowi, Potter, Sullivan

Alper Tolga Bulut. Assistant Professor Department of International Relations Karadeniz Technical University

RESEARCH SEMINAR: DEMOCRACY IN AMERICA. Fall Political Science 320 Haverford College

Faculty of Political Science Thammasat University

Political Science 101: Governing Global Finance

Vitae. John D. Huber. April 19, 2009

College of Arts and Sciences. Political Science

SAFEGUARDING THE FUTURE THROUGH BETTER ANTICIPATORY GOVERNANCE

The Department of Political Science combines

Western European Politics

Poznan July The vulnerability of the European Elite System under a prolonged crisis

Department of Political Science Graduate Course Descriptions Fall 2018

Case studies, process tracing and causal mechanisms in comparative politics Forschungsprojekt Topics and readings

M.A. Democratic Governance and Civil Society (Degree Plan)

Political Science 381: The Politics of Electoral Systems. Course Description

THE REFORM OF THE UNITED NATIONS SECURITY COUNCIL AND CONFLICT MANAGEMENT

Strategic Models of Politics

IS - International Studies

Chino Valley Unified School District High School Course Description

PLAN 619 Fall 2014 Cultural Diversity in Planning University of Hawai`i, Department of Urban & Regional Planning

PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION (PUAD)

Electoral System Change in Europe since 1945: Luxembourg

The final exam will be closed-book.

Lobbying successfully: Interest groups, lobbying coalitions and policy change in the European Union

PADM-GP Policy Formation and Policy Analysis. Fall 2018

DEPARTMENT OF POLITICAL SCIENCE

College of Arts and Sciences. Political Science

Karen Long Jusko. February 15, 2017

Democracy and economic development

Christopher Wratil. John F. Kennedy Memorial Fellow, Minda de Gunzburg Center for European Studies, Harvard University

Political Institutions and Policy-Making in the European Union. Fall 2007 Political Science 603

POLITICAL ELITES & LEADERSHIP

POLITICAL SCIENCE (POLS)

The Electoral Connection of Ministerial. Selection in the UK

REGIONAL POLICY MAKING AND SME

Why do member states waste their time? Legislative oversight in the EU decision making process. Thomas König

The Three Branches of Government include the executive, the legislative, and the

RPOS 325 (3733) and RPAD 325 (9070): The Government and Politics of New York State. Fall 2013, Thursday, 5:45-8:35 pm, Humanities Building, Room 129.

Socio-Political Marketing

Transcription:

Summer Semester 2018 Thursday, 12:00-13:30 (Hörsaal, Gottfried Keller Straße 6) Prof. Sven-Oliver Proksch Cologne Center for Comparative Politics (CCCP) E-mail: so.proksch@uni-koeln.de Office Hours: (by appointment, online registration via Ilias) Office: Universitätsstrasse 91 1. Course Description This seminar surveys research on comparative legislative behavior and politics at the national and supranational level in Europe. The seminar will adopt an analytical and empirical perspective. The readings focus mostly on recent theoretical and empirical work on parliaments. Questions that the course will address include: whose interests do politicians represent? How do multiparty governments confront the challenges of joint policymaking? Why can minority governments be effective law-makers? Why are ministerial careers only weakly connected to patterns of government termination? When do opposition parties support governments? Do parliamentary speeches reflect political polarization? Do voters reward or punish rebel MPs? How do mainstream parties respond to populist parties in parliament? How does substantive representation of women occur in parliament? How do members of the European Parliament represent interests? How can national parliaments successfully scrutinize European legislation? In addition to a discussion of these topics, the course will offer two data skill sessions in which students will get to know how to manage and analyze legislative data and speeches. 2. Course Objectives Develop capacity to understand and critically reflect on the main debates related to the study of legislative politics and behavior Develop empirical research skills Develop oral presentation skills Learn how to write an empirical research paper

3. Prerequisites While there is no formal prerequisite, students should bring an open mind and willingness to learn quantitative methods. 4. Course Requirements It is expected that student participate regularly and actively in the seminar. Students will be evaluated on the basis of the following components: 1. Presentation (30%) The course presentation has three components. The first component is a seminar discussion role (10%). Each student will serve as discussion leader for a particular week. Depending on the size of the class, several students may share this task. The student will start the seminar by describing key conceptual issues, central arguments and debates, and methodological issues. The initial presentation should last for about 10 minutes (possibly shared with other students). The second component is a research presentation (15%). Each student will present a research project (research design and preliminary results). The third component is the provision of feedback to other student presentations (5%). This feedback should be respectful and offer constructive methodological criticism, including ideas for how the research can be improved. In addition to providing at least one constructive comment in class, students need to submit the written comments after the presentations to the instructor. 2. Research Paper (70%) Students will write a 15 page research paper, to be handed in on August 9 (PhD students 15-20 pages). You are encouraged to use the research project as an opportunity to start work on your thesis, or to work on a potentially publishable paper. A list of references and appendices do not count towards the page limit. The final paper should focus on a puzzle in the field of legislative behavior or politics in Europe and be one of the following: (a) a research design for an empirical study (MA thesis or PhD dissertation) (a) an original empirical analysis using existing datasets You are expected to hand in a 2-page proposal for the paper, indicating choice (a) or (b) by May 24 (email). It should describe the puzzle/research question, working hypotheses, and the methods (and possibly data) you are planning to use. PhD students are encourage to submit an empirical analysis (option b). Version: March 14, 2018 2

5. Bonus Points You will be able to collect up bonus points to improve the final grade (bonus points are not transferable to other semesters). You may receive the top grade for this class without submitting any bonus work. The following activities will yield bonus points: Proposing a discussion question You can submit a discussion question until Wednesday noon before class for weeks 2-4, 6-7, and 10 (Ilias). The question should go beyond mere questions for clarification, but should be suitable for a discussion of the readings and demonstrate that you have done the readings. If I pick your question for debate in class that week, you will receive 1 bonus point. If I do not pick your question, you will receive 0 bonus points. In total, you will be able to accumulate a total of 6 bonus points for this part. Group project on parliamentary speech You will receive a data analysis assignment related to the automated text analysis of political speech after the first data skills session. You may complete this assignment together with another seminar member. Details about the assignment will be announced on May 17. You will have two weeks to complete the assignment. You will be able to receive up to 6 bonus points for the assignment. Analyzing legislative data You will receive a data analysis assignment related to the analysis of legislative data after the second data skills session. You may complete this assignment together with another seminar member. Details about the assignment will be announced on June 28. You will have two weeks to complete the assignment. You will be able to receive up to 6 bonus points for the assignment. 6. Course Material Readings will be available as electronic articles through Ilias. Version: March 14, 2018 3

7. Course Outline Week 1 Introduction to the Study of Legislative Politics and Behavior April 12 Martin, S., T. Saalfeld, and K. W. Strøm. 2014. Introduction in: Martin et al. (eds), The Oxford Handbook of Legislative Studies. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Uslaner, E. M, and Zittel, T. 2006. Comparative Legislative Behavior. In Rhodes, R. et al. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Political Institutions, Oxford: Oxford University Press. Week 2 Cabinets, Ministers, and Law-Making April 19 Martin, L. and G. Vanberg. 2011. Parliaments and Coalitions: The Role of Legislative Institutions in Multiparty Governance. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Chapters 2-3 and 5. Strom, K. 1984. Minority governments in parliamentary democracies: The rationality of nonwinning cabinet solutions. Comparative Political Studies, 17(2), 199-227. Huber, JD. and C. Martinez-Gallardo. 2008. Replacing Cabinet Ministers: Patterns of Ministerial Stability in Parliamentary Democracies. American Political Science Review 102(1): 169-80 Week 3 Opposition Politics April 26 Andeweg, Rudy B. 2013. Parties in Parliament: The Blurring of Opposition. In Müller, W. C. and Narud, H. (eds.), Party Governance and Party Democracy, pages 99 114. Springer, New York. Louwerse, T., Otjes, S., Willumsen, D.M. and Öhberg, P., 2016. Reaching across the aisle: Explaining government opposition voting in parliament. Party Politics, DOI: 10.1177/1354068815626000, pp. 1-14 Proksch, S.O. and Slapin, J.B., 2011. Parliamentary questions and oversight in the European Union. European Journal of Political Research, 50(1), pp. 53-79 Version: March 14, 2018 4

Week 4 Electoral Connection and Party Unity May 3 Proksch, Sven-Oliver and Jonathan B. Slapin. 2015. Politics of Parliamentary Debate: Parties, Rebels, and Representation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Chapters 1-2. Campbell, R., Cowley, P., Vivyan, N., and Wagner, M. 2016. Legislator Dissent as a Valence Signal. British Journal of Political Science Hix, Simon. 2004. Electoral Institutions and Legislative Behavior: Explaining Voting Defection in the European Parliament. World Politics 56(2), pp. 194-223. Week 5 Data Skills I: Automated Text Analysis of Political Speech May 17 Students will learn various automated text analysis techniques for political speeches. A laptop is required. Instructions will be circulated in advance. Week 6 Populist Parties in Parliament June 7 Kaltwasser, C.R. et al. 2017. Populism: An Overview of the Concept and the State of the Art. In: Kaltwasser et al. (eds) The Oxford Handbook of Populism. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Schumacher, G., and Van Kersbergen, K. 2016. Do mainstream parties adapt to the welfare chauvinism of populist parties? Party Politics, 22(3), 300-312. Otjes, S. and Louwerse, T. 2015. Populists in Parliament: Comparing Left-Wing and Right-Wing Populism in the Netherlands. Political Studies, 63: 60 79. Version: March 14, 2018 5

Week 7 Women in Parliament June 14 Childs, S., and Krook, M. L. 2009. Analysing women s substantive representation: From critical mass to critical actors. Government and Opposition, 44(2), 125-145. O Brien, D. Z. 2015. Rising to the Top: Gender, Political Performance, and Party Leadership in Parliamentary Democracies. American Journal of Political Science, 59: 1022 1039. Barnes, T. 2016. Gendering Legislative Behavior: Institutional Constraints and Collaboration. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Chapters 1-3. Week 8 No class (EPSA conference) June 21 Week 9 Data Skills II: Analyzing Legislative Data (4 hour session) June 28 We will discuss available datasets suitable for legislative analysis and techniques for analyzing them. A laptop is required. Instructions will be circulated in advance. Note: the session from 14-15:30 will take place in Building 210, (Bauwens- Gebäude), Richard Strauss Straße 2, 2.B.11 Week 10 The European Parliament and National Parliaments July 5 Proksch, SO and J. B. Slapin. 2015. Politics of Parliamentary Debate: Parties, Rebels, and Representation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Chapter 7. Senninger, R. 2017 Issue expansion and selective scrutiny - how opposition parties used parliamentary questions about the European Union in the national arena from 1973 to 2013, European Union Politics 18 (2), pp. 283-306. Auel, K and C. Neuhold. 2016. Multi-arena players in the making? Conceptualizing the role of national parliaments since the Lisbon Treaty, Journal of European Public Policy 24 (10), pp. 1547-1561. Version: March 14, 2018 6

Week 11 No class July 12 Week 12 Research Presentations (4 hour session) July 19 Students will present their research projects in class. Note: the session from 14-15:30 will take place in Building 210, (Bauwens- Gebäude), Richard Strauss Straße 2, 2.B.11 Version: March 14, 2018 7