IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION

Similar documents
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION

IN THE DISTRICT COURT, COUNTY OF CASS, NORTH DAKOTA

FILED: QUEENS COUNTY CLERK 02/07/ :50 PM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 9 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 02/07/2017

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF COUNTY, ARKANSAS DIVISION PLAINTIFF DEFENDANT S FIRST INTERROGATORIES TO PLAINTIFF

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 12/15/ :09 AM INDEX NO /2017 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 11 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 12/15/2017

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND. v. * Case No. 17-cv-2006-EH * * * * * * * * * * * * *

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

January 24, Via Electronic Transmission

IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

DEFINITIONS AND INSTRUCTIONS

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

ATTORNEY GENERAL DEPARTMENT OF LEGAL AFFAIRS ECONOMIC CRIMES SUBPOENA DUCES TECUM C/O:

Case: 1:11-cv Document #: 144 Filed: 09/29/14 Page 1 of 9 PageID #:1172

DIVISION OF ST. THOMAS/ ST. JOHN PLAINTIFF'S FIRST SET OF INTERROGATORIES TO DEFENDANT WAHEED HAMED

IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA Charlotte Division

APPENDIX I SAMPLE INTERROGATORIES

CAUSE NO. 18-C STREETS TO SHEETS ANIMAL IN THE COUNTY COURT AT LAW RESCUE Plaintiff, v. NO. 1

Case: 1:11-cv Document #: 30 Filed: 12/16/11 Page 1 of 17 PageID #:161

STATE OF FLORIDA OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL DEPARTMENT OF LEGAL AFFAIRS ECONOMIC CRIMES SUBPOENA DUCES TECUM WITHOUT APPEARANCE POWDERZ, INC.

December 12, Via facsimile transmission: Mitchell A. Leon President DesignWrite Inc. 175 Wall Street Princeton, NJ 08540

Information or instructions: Combined discovery requests, admissions, production of documents and interrogatories

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SECOND JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR LEON COUNTY, FLORIDA. v. Case No.: 2012 CA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION

Attorney s BriefCase Beyond the Basics Depositions in Family Law Matters

Case Doc Filed 11/22/17 Entered 11/22/17 17:35:58 Desc Exhibit 2 Page 1 of 6

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 04/11/2013 INDEX NO /2012 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 41 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 04/11/2013

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION TRUSTEE S FIRST DISCOVERY REQUESTS TO SOLAR INTEGRATED TECHNOLOGIES GMHB

FILED: KINGS COUNTY CLERK 06/08/ :39 PM INDEX NO /2017 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 9 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 06/08/2017

Case 3:16-cv CRS-CHL Document 36 Filed 06/29/17 Page 1 of 5 PageID #: 423

IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. [insert individual case information] ) ) MDL NO.

Case KJC Doc 4929 Filed 12/14/17 Page 1 of 12 IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE. x : : : : : : x.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA PALM BEACH DIVISION CASE NO CIV-KAM

YOU ARE HEREBY COMMANDED to produce to Eric Wm. Hendon, Esq., Assistant Attorney

FILED: ORANGE COUNTY CLERK 03/17/ :37 PM

Case 2:13-cv Document Filed in TXSD on 11/18/14 Page 1 of 5

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS AUSTIN DIVISION

DISTRICT COURT CLARK COUNTY, NEVADA

Control N rnber: ' Item Number: 397. Addendurn StartPage: 0

THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE. Docket No CV Sanjeev Lath

FILED: KINGS COUNTY CLERK 12/22/ :45 PM INDEX NO /2015 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 132 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 12/22/2017

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA. CASE NO.: Civ-Martinez

Page 1. Veritext Chicago Reporting Company

Medicaid Fraud Control Unit Investigative Subpoena Duces Tecum

Case 2:05-cv TJW Document 211 Filed 12/21/2005 Page 1 of 11

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Miami Division CASE NO CIV-SIMONTON

Case 3:16-cv SB Document 13-1 Filed 06/03/16 Page 1 of 5

Case 3:16-cv Document 1-1 Filed 02/29/16 Page 1 of 68 SUBPOENA UNITED STATES OF AMERICA NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD

SOLID ROCK CHURCH, INC. ofcourt File No. 71-C ELK RIVER, MINNESOTA, a Minnesota Non-Profit Corporation,

U.S. Department of Justice

ATTORNEY GENERAL DEPARTMENT OF LEGAL AFFAIRS ECONOMIC CRIME DIVISION FIRST INVESTIGATIVE SUBPOENA DUCES TECUM

Case 3:16-cv DPJ-FKB Document 43 Filed 04/13/17 Page 1 of 2

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIVIL DIVISION Landlord And Tenant Branch

Case 3:16-md VC Document Filed 01/09/19 Page 1 of 18 EXHIBIT A

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 07/01/ :00 AM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 14 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 07/01/2017

December 12, Via Electronic Transmission

COMMERCIAL DIVISION PRELIMINARY CONFERENCE ORDER PURSUANT TO PART 202 OF THE UNIFORM CIVIL RULES FOR THE SUPREME COURT KINGS COUNTY

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 06/11/2014 INDEX NO /2013 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 61 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 06/11/2014

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA

31 U.S.C. Section 3733 Civil investigative demands

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT

Pursuant to Rule 34, Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, plaintiff, by his attorneys,

Sample. Index No: [Insert] RJI No: [Insert] PLAINTIFF S NOTICE TO PRODUCE

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Debtor.

Case 2:13-cv Document Filed in TXSD on 11/18/14 Page 1 of 7

CAUSE NO. THE STATE OF TEXAS IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF [INSERT PROPERTY] JUDICIAL DISTRICT

Case 0:17-cv CMA Document 58 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/30/2017 Page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 09/08/ :45 PM INDEX NO /2015 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 195 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 09/08/2017

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIVIL DIVISION Landlord and Tenant Branch

THE STATE OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

National Patent Board Non-Binding Arbitration Rules TABLE OF CONTENTS

BULK USER AGREEMENT RECITALS

Depositions upon oral examination. A. When depositions may be taken. After commencement of the action, any party may take the testimony of any

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 04/12/ :50 AM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 143 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 04/12/2017. Exhibit A

Case 1:99-cv ECH Document 295 Filed 03/19/2008 Page 1 of 26 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS

Defendants. X THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK. WE COMMAND YOU, That all business and excuses being laid aside, you appear at

H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Inc. Patent and Copyright Agreement ( Agreement )

Dated: Dated: DEFINITIONS

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 01/08/ :16 AM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 52 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 01/08/2018

(e) Appearance of Attorney. An attorney may appear in a proceeding in any of the following ways:

HAWAII ADMINISTRATIVE RULES TITLE 12 DEPARTMENT OF LABOR AND INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS SUBTITLE 7 BOARDS CHAPTER 47

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

ANTITRUST CIVIL INVESTIGATIVE DEMAND

19-CV-0222 CAUSE NO. Plaintiff, v. GALVESTON COUNTY, TEXAS

1. Intent. 2. Definitions. OCERS Board Policy Administrative Hearing Procedures

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 07/13/ :56 PM INDEX NO /2015 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 50 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 07/13/2018

INTERNATIONAL DISPUTE RESOLUTION PROCEDURES

S FIRST SET OF INTERROGATORIES, FIRST REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS,

Do Illinois rules expressly permit video recording of depositions, in lieu of stenography?

IN THE GENERAL COURT OF JUSTICE DISTRICT COURT DIVISION., ) Plaintiff, ) ) CONSENT STIPULATIONS FOR v. ) ARBITRATION PROCEDURES ), ) Defendant.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Plaintiff, Defendant. PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that Plaintiff Acme Home & Garden, LLC demands answers

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF DEKALB COUNTY STATE OF GEORGIA RULE 5.2 CERTIFICATE

ADR CODE OF PROCEDURE

Transcription:

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION JOSE JIMENEZ MORENO and MARIA JOSE LOPEZ, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, vs. Plaintiffs, JANET NAPOLITANO, et al., in their official capacities, Defendants. No. 1:11-cv-05452 Judge John Z. Lee NOTICE OF RULE 30(B(6 DEPOSITION PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that pursuant to Rule 30(b(6 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Plaintiffs Jose Jimenez Moreno and Maria Jose Lopez, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated (collectively, Plaintiffs, by and through counsel, will take the deposition of U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE and/or the Department of Homeland Security (DHS on the subject matters set forth in Exhibit A at the offices of Winston & Strawn LLP, 35 W. Wacker Dr., Chicago, IL 60601, on May, 2013, or at a time and place mutually agreeable to the parties. The deposition will continue from day to day until completed and shall be taken before an officer, notary public, or other person duly authorized to administer oaths. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 30(b(3, the testimony will be recorded by stenographic, audio, video, and/or realtime transcription means.

Dated: April 19, 2013 By: /s/ Benjamin P. Carr Linda T. Coberly Raymond C. Perkins Benjamin P. Carr Joel M. Wallace WINSTON & STRAWN LLP 35 West Wacker Drive Chicago, IL 60601 (312 558-5600 LCoberly@winston.com RPerkins@winston.com BCarr@winston.com JWallace@winston.com Claudia Beatrice Valenzuela Rivas Mark M. Fleming NATIONAL IMMIGRANT JUSTICE CENTER 208 South LaSalle Street, Suite 1818 Chicago, Illinois 60604 Telephone: (312 660-1370 Fax: (312 660-1505 cvalenzuela@heartlandalliance.org mfleming@heartlandalliance.org Attorneys for Plaintiffs 2

EXHIBIT A DEFINITIONS AND INSTRUCTIONS 1. Plaintiff(s shall refer to Jose Jimenez Moreno and Maria Jose Lopez, and all other similarly situated individuals who may be members of the class as defined in Plaintiffs Motion for Class Certification, Renewed Motion for Class Certification, and/or any further revisions or amendments to those Motions. 2. Defendant(s shall refer to Janet Napolitano, John Morton, David C. Palmatier, and Ricardo Wong, acting in their official capacities, and includes, but is not limited to, any predecessors or successors, and any agents, attorneys, representatives, employees, and/or other persons acting on their behalf. 3. ICE shall mean U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement and includes, but is not limited to, any predecessor or successor agencies, and any divisions, departments, affiliates, agents, attorneys, representatives, employees, and/or other persons acting on its behalf. 4. DHS shall mean the U.S. Department of Homeland Security and includes, but is not limited to, any predecessor or successor agencies, and any divisions, departments, affiliates, agents, attorneys, representatives, employees, and/or other persons acting on its behalf. 5. Detainer(s shall mean DHS Form I-247, currently entitled Immigration Detainer Notice of Action. Except as specified in an individual Topic, this Definition shall include the current version of the Detainer as well as any prior versions or subsequent revisions. 6. Person or persons shall mean an individual, corporation, proprietorship, partnership, association, or any other entity. 7. The term document shall have the broadest meaning possible under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and shall include, but not be limited to, the original (or a copy when the 3

original is not available and each non-identical copy (including those which are non-identical by reason of translations, notations, or markings or any and all other written, printed, typed, punched, taped, filmed, or graphic matter or recorded or tangible thing, or whatever description, however produced or reproduced (including computer-stored or generated data, together with instructions or programs necessary to search and retrieve such data and hard copies where available and retrievable, and shall include all attachments to and enclosures with any requested item, to which they are attached or with which they are enclosed, and each draft thereof. The term document shall specifically include all recorded or retrievable electronic data or communications such as electronic mail (e-mail and the like and all translations thereof. 8. The term thing refers to any tangible object, other than a document, and includes objects of every kind and nature, including, but not limited to, prototypes, models, and specimens. 9. Communication means any oral, written, electronic, or other exchange of words, thoughts, information, or ideas to another person or entity, whether in person, in a group, by telephone, by letter, by Telex, by facsimile, by electronic mail, or by any other process, electric, electronic, or otherwise. All such communications in writing shall include, without limitation, printed, typed, handwritten, or other readable documents, correspondence, memoranda, reports, contracts, drafts (both initial and subsequent, computer discs or transmissions, e-mails, instant messages, tape or video recordings, voicemails, diaries, log books, minutes, notes, studies, surveys and forecasts, and any and all copies thereof. 10. The words or, and, all, every, any, each, one or more, including, and similar words of guidance, are intended merely as such, and should not be construed as words of limitation. The words or and and shall include each other whenever possible to 4

expand, not restrict, the scope of the Topic. The word including shall not be used to limit any general category or description that precedes it. The words all, every, any, each, and one or more shall include each other whenever possible to expand, not restrict, the scope of the Interrogatory. 11. Reference to the singular in any of these Topics shall also include a reference to the plural, and reference to the plural also shall include a reference to the singular. 12. These Topics are intended to elicit as much information as possible concerning the issues, and to the extent any Topic could be interpreted in more than one way, you should employ the interpretation of the Topic most likely to encompass and elicit the greatest amount of information possible. 13. Discovery is continuing and Plaintiffs reserve the right to supplement these Topics as necessary. TOPICS In accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 30(b(6, DHS and/or ICE shall identify, designate, and produce for deposition one or more officers, directors, managing agents or other person(s most knowledgeable to testify on its/their behalf regarding the subject matter of the following categories: TOPIC NO. 1 DHS and ICE s policies, procedures, and practices related to the investigation, issuance, cancellation, and enforcement of Detainers from 2010 to the present, including, but not limited to, any policies, procedures, and practices that were developed prior to 2010, but were in effect as of 2010. 5

TOPIC NO. 2 The records, files, and documents used by DHS and ICE in conjunction with the investigation, issuance, cancellation, and enforcement of Detainers, including, but not limited to, where and how those records, files, and documents are maintained and updated; how they are accessed by DHS and/or ICE agents; the information contained in those records, files, and documents; the scope of those records, files, and documents (e.g., date limitations; what information is used from those records, files, and documents; and how such information is used. TOPIC NO. 3 The records, files, documents, or any other information obtained from local or state law enforcement in conjunction with the investigation, issuance, cancellation, and enforcement of Detainers by ICE and DHS. TOPIC NO. 4 DHS and ICE s policies, procedures, and practices related to notifying an individual that a Detainer has been lodged against him or her or cancelled from 2010 to the present, including, but not limited to, any policies, procedures, and practices that were developed prior to 2010, but were in effect as of 2010. TOPIC NO. 5 The policies, procedures, mechanisms, or processes by which an individual can challenge the legality of a Detainer, from 2010 to the present, including, but not limited to, those described in Defendants responses to Plaintiffs Interrogatories. TOPIC NO. 6 ICE s revision(s of its Detainer policy and the Detainer form from 2010 to the present, including the reasons for those revision(s. 6

TOPIC NO. 7 The basis for ICE s assertion of authority to issue Detainers instructing an additional 48 hours of detention for the individual subject to the Detainer, including, but not limited to, statutory authorization and any pertinent regulations. TOPIC NO. 8 The documents identified in Section B of Defendants Initial Disclosures. TOPIC NO. 9 DHS and ICE s policies, procedures, and practices related to interactions and communications with local government or local law enforcement agencies regarding Detainers. TOPIC NO. 10 The identity of every employee and agent of DHS and/or ICE who was involved in the issuance and/or cancellation of a detainer against Named Plaintiffs Jose Jimenez Moreno and Maria Jose Lopez and each employee or agent s role. TOPIC NO. 11 Defendants responses to Plaintiff s First and Second Sets of Requests for Admission and First and Second Sets of Interrogatories to Defendants. TOPIC NO. 12 The organization and structure of DHS and ICE, including, but not limited to, a description of any departments, sections, or other subdivisions of those agencies that have duties or responsibilities related to the investigation, issuance, cancellation, or enforcement of Detainers. 7

TOPIC NO. 13 Information related to DHS and ICE s decision to activate the Secure Communities program in Cook County, Illinois and the other remaining 75 counties in the State of Illinois that were not reportedly activated as of May 4, 2011, when Illinois terminated its participation in the Secure Communities program. 8

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION JOSE JIMENEZ MORENO and MARIA JOSE LOPEZ, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, vs. Plaintiffs, JANET NAPOLITANO, et al., in their official capacities, Defendants. No. 1:11-cv-05452 Judge John Z. Lee CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I, Benjamin P. Carr, hereby certify that on the 19th day of April, 2013, I caused a true and correct copy of the foregoing NOTICE OF RULE 30(B(6 DEPOSITION to be served via electronic mail upon the following: Colin A. Kisor Lana L. Vahab William C. Silvis U.S. DPT. OF JUSTICE, CIVIL DIVISION OFFICE OF IMMIGRATION LITIGATION, DISTRICT COURT SECTION P.O. Box 868, Ben Franklin Station Washington, D.C. 20044 colin.kisor@usdoj.gov lana.vahab@usdoj.gov william.silvis@usdoj.gov Craig Arthur Oswald UNITED STATES ATTORNEY S OFFICE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS 219 South Dearborn Street, Suite 500 Chicago, Illinois 60604 craig.oswald@usdoj.gov /s/ Benjamin P. Carr 9