Case 1:06-cv PCH Document 35 Filed 10/27/2006 Page 1 of 7

Similar documents
Case 1:06-cv PCH Document 38 Filed 11/09/2006 Page 1 of 15

Case 1:06-cv PCH Document 30 Filed 10/24/2006 Page 1 of 11

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION

Case No. COMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY AND INJUNCTIVE RELIEF. Plaintiffs, MATTHEW CALDWELL and THE CAMPAIGN TO ELECT MATT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

Case 1:06-cv PCH Document 22 Filed 10/13/2006 Page 1 of 20

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA. Case No.: CIV-ALTONAGA/Turnoff

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO CIV RYSKAMP/VITUNAC

Case 0:06-cv JIC Document 97 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/10/2013 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

Case 1:11-mc MGC Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/07/2011 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

Case 2:06-cv PMP-RJJ Document 1-1 Filed 10/10/2006 Page 1 of 12

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA PENSACOLA DIVISION

Case 0:16-cv WPD Document 29 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/07/2017 Page 1 of 4

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA WEST PALM BEACH DIVISION

Case 9:16-cv RLR Document 198 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/03/2017 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA. Case No.:

Case 1:16-cv RNS Document 24 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/16/2016 Page 1 of 5

Case 1:17-cv JAL Document 73 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/12/2017 Page 1 of 11

Case 1:04-cv JLK Document 213 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/04/2007 Page 1 of 5

Case 0:11-cv RNS Document 149 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/22/2014 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA. Case No. 2:04-cv-47-FtM-29 SPC

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

Case 1:17-cv DPG Document 3 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/04/2017 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

Case 0:17-cv BB Document 42 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/05/2017 Page 1 of 6. Case No. 0:17-cv BB RICHARD WIGGINS,

Case 9:16-cv RLR Document 129 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/01/2017 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

Case 1:11-cv JEM Document 77 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/06/2011 Page 1 of 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

Case 1:16-cv DPG Document 318 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/20/2017 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.: CIV-KING/O SULLIVAN

Case 0:16-cv WPD Document 20 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/20/2017 Page 1 of 4

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA. Case No.: CIV-SEITZ/MCALILEY

Case 1:06-cv PCH Document 1 Filed 09/29/2006 Page 1 of 17

Case 1:16-cv DPG Document 509 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/06/2018 Page 1 of 9

Case 8:14-cv JDW-EAJ Document 10 Filed 01/12/15 Page 1 of 5 PageID 81 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION

Case 9:14-cv DMM Document 118 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/17/2014 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA PETITIONER CRESCENT MIAMI CENTER, LLC S BRIEF ON JURISDICTION

Filing # E-Filed 11/23/ :59:27 PM

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE TWELFTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT OF FLORIDA, IN AND FOR SARASOTA COUNTY

Filing # E-Filed 11/10/ :27:26 PM

Case 3:08-cv DAK Document 56 Filed 09/23/09 Page 1 of 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION. v. Case No. 8:10-cv-2904-T-23TBM

Case 1:04-cv ASG Document 656 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/09/2012 Page 1 of 12

Filing # E-Filed 08/28/ :22:03 PM

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION

Case 1:18-cv KMW Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/30/2018 Page 1 of 13

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA PLAINTIFFS MOTION FOR CLARIFICATION OF SCHEDULING ORDER AND INCORPORATED MEMORANDUM OF LAW

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE TWENTIETH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR LEE COUNTY, FLORIDA

In the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA Harrisburg Division --ELECTRONICALLY FILED--

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA. Case No. 2:04-cv-47-FtM-33SPC (LAG)

PlainSite. Legal Document. Florida Middle District Court Case No. 6:10-cv Career Network, Inc. et al v. WOT Services, Ltd. et al.

COMPLAINT AND DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL

Case 6:12-cv ACC-TBS Document 67 Filed 02/04/13 Page 1 of 8 PageID 520 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA ORLANDO DIVISION

Case 0:13-cv MGC Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/05/2013 Page 1 of 8

PLAINTIFFS MOTION TO COMPEL DEFENDANT FRANK AVELLINO TO PRODUCE DOCUMENTS IN RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFFS THIRD REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO CIV-MOORE/SIMONTON ORDER ON PLAINTIFFS MOTION TO COMPEL INSPECTION

Case 3:16-cv CWR-LRA Document 25 Filed 08/08/16 Page 1 of 9

Case 2:09-cv KMM Document 53 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/03/2010 Page 1 of 9

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

Case: 3:07-cv KKC Doc #: 42 Filed: 03/20/08 Page: 1 of 8 - Page ID#: 282

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION

McClellan v. Cablevision of Connecticut, 949 F.Supp. 97 (1997) UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT

Case 0:15-cv KMM Document 94 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/16/2016 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA MIAMI DIVISION Case No CIV-SEITZ/MCALILEY

Case 9:03-cv KAM Document 2795 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/17/2014 Page 1 of 8

Filing # E-Filed 03/11/ :10:57 PM

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA MIAMI DIVISION Case No. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

brought suit against Defendants on March 30, Plaintiff Restraining Order (docs. 3, 4), and a Motion for Judicial Notice

Case 1:16-cv DPG Document 460 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/09/2018 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

MARTIN COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS

Case 3:05-cv JGC Document Filed 01/05/2006 Page 1 of 9

Case 9:15-cv KAM Document 37 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/03/2015 Page 1 of 7

Case 8:04-cv SCB-TBM Document 32 Filed 10/07/2005 Page 1 of 6

Case 1:11-cv MGC Document 78 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/15/2011 Page 1 of 8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA OCALA DIVISION. v. Case No: 5:13-MC-004-WTH-PRL ORDER

Case 1:13-cv JIC Document 100 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/07/2014 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

Case 3:12-cv DPJ-FKB Document 189 Filed 03/02/17 Page 1 of 5

Case 1:18-cv JLK Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/22/2018 Page 1 of 3 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

Case 0:17-cv BB Document 89 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/19/2018 Page 1 of 4

Case 1:12-cv CMA Document 132 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/02/2013 Page 1 of 10

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE VIRGIN ISLANDS DIVISION OF ST. CROIX

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION. IN RE: NATIONAL PRESCRIPTION MDL No OPIATE LITIGATION Master Docket No.

OF FLORIDA. An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Daryl E. Trawick, Judge.

Filing # E-Filed 02/03/ :01:59 PM

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO MC-MOORE/SIMONTON ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS MOTION TO COMPEL PRODUCTION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

Case 6:14-cv CEM-TBS Document 31 Filed 01/16/15 Page 1 of 10 PageID 1331

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA ORLANDO DIVISION. v. Case No. 6:14-cv-668-Orl-37KRS ORDER

IN UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Case 9:16-cv RLR Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/15/2016 Page 1 of 6

Case 2:13-cv RJS Document 105 Filed 12/23/13 Page 1 of 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF UTAH CENTRAL DIVISION

Case: 3:17-cv JJH Doc #: 1 Filed: 08/15/17 1 of 22. PageID #: 1

IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

Case 1:15-cv MGC Document 175 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/29/2017 Page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

Case 1:16-cv Document 1 Filed 03/04/16 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 1

CLOSED CIVIL CASE. Case 1:09-cv DLG Document 62 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/14/2010 Page 1 of 10

Transcription:

Case 106-cv-22463-PCH Document 35 Filed 10/27/2006 Page 1 of 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA MIAMI DIVISION CBS BROADCASTING INC., AMERICAN BROADCASTING COMPANIES, INC., THE ASSOCIATED PRESS, CABLE NEWS NETWORK LP, LLLP, FOX NEWS NETWORK, L.L.C. and NBC UNIVERSAL, INC., Case No. 06-22463-CIV v. Plaintiffs, Huck, J./Simonton, MJ SUE M. COBB, in her official capacity as Secretary of State of the State of Florida, and LESTER SOLA, in his official capacity as the Supervisor of Elections of Miami-Dade County, Florida and as representative of a defendant class of all county Supervisors of Elections in the State of Florida, Defendants. / PLAINTIFFS MOTION TO AMEND FINAL JUDGMENT PURSUANT TO FED. R. CIV. P. 59(e) AND ACCOMPANYING MEMORANDUM OF LAW Plaintiffs CBS Broadcasting, Inc., American Broadcasting Companies, Inc., The Associated Press, Cable News Network, LP, LLLP, Fox News Network, L.L.C., and NBC Universal, Inc., hereby move this Honorable Court for entry of an Amended Final Judgment pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e) in this action and in support thereof, state Out of an abundance of caution, and to ensure orderly administration of Plaintiffs exit polling activities on election day and universal enforcement of this Court s order, Plaintiffs request that this Court amend its Final Judgment and Declaratory Relief Order, to clarify that all members of the defendant class of Supervisors of Elections of the State of Florida and their agents are barred from enforcing Fla. Stat. 102.031(4)(a) as applied to Plaintiffs exit polling behavior. Plaintiffs intend to conduct exit polls at forty polling sites in various counties throughout the State of Florida on November 7, 2006. On October 24, 2006 this Court declared that Fla.

Case 106-cv-22463-PCH Document 35 Filed 10/27/2006 Page 2 of 7 Stat. 102.031(4)(a) impermissibly proscribed constitutionally protected exit polling and barred Defendants from enforcing Fla. Stat. 102.031(4)(a) as applied to Plaintiffs exit polling behavior. CBS v. Cobb, No. 06-22463-CIV, Order Granting Plaintiffs Declaratory Relief, (October 24, 2006) ( Declaratory Relief Order ). On October 24, 2006, this Court also granted Plaintiffs Motion for Class Certification and certified a class of all county Supervisors of Elections in the State of Florida with the named defendant, Lester Sola, Miami-Dade County Supervisor of Elections, certified as the class representative. CBS v. Cobb, No. 06-22463-CIV, Order Granting Plaintiffs Motion for Class Certification, Certifying Defendant Class, and Designating Class Representative, (October 24, 2006) ( Defendant Class Order ). Two days later, on October 26, 2006, the Court issued Final Judgment in this case. CBS v. Cobb, 06-022463-CIV, Final Judgment (October 26, 2006) ( Final Judgment ). The Final Judgment stated that Defendants are barred from enforcing Fla. Stat. 102.031(4)(a) as applied to Plaintiffs exit-polling activities. For the reasons specified in the accompanying Memorandum of Law, amendment of the Final Judgment and Declaratory Relief Order is appropriate. Plaintiffs request expedited treatment of the instant motion. Elections are just ten days away, and time is needed to see that any order upon this motion is distributed to the appropriate persons. MEMORANDUM OF LAW Plaintiffs hereby submit the instant Memorandum of Law in support of their Motion to Amend Judgment pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e). Plaintiffs request that this Court s Final Judgment Order, issued October 26, 2006 and Order Granting Plaintiffs Declaratory Relief, issued October 24, 2006, be amended to specify that all members of the defendant class of PAGE 2

Case 106-cv-22463-PCH Document 35 Filed 10/27/2006 Page 3 of 7 county Supervisors of Elections of the State of Florida and their agents are also bound by the relief granted therein. ARGUMENT In order to ensure that Plaintiffs can peacefully and effectively carry out their exit-polling behavior on November 7, 2006, it is critical that the Final Judgment Order and Declaratory Relief Order in this matter specify that all members of the defendant class and their agents, not just the named defendants, are bound by the Final Judgment. 1 The term Defendants in the Final Judgment and Declaratory Relief Order is not defined to explicitly include the defendant class of Supervisors of Elections and their agents. Plaintiffs are concerned that their exit polling reporters, who will be at various polling sites throughout Florida, will be met with confusion by polling officials and forced to comply with Fla. Stat. 102.031(a). To combat any confusion, the exit polling reporters intend to have in hand this Court s Final Judgment and Declaratory Relief Order. The proposed amendment to the Final Judgment and Declaratory Relief Order will ensure that each county Supervisor of Elections, as well as their agents, know that he or she is bound by the relief granted to Plaintiffs in this matter. Election day is the only day where enforcement of this Court s Order may be a disputed issue. If there is any ambiguity in the language of the Final Judgment or Declaratory Relief Order as to who is bound by it, the result would be a violation of Plaintiffs First and Fourteenth Amendment rights and just the type of manifest injustice Federal Rule 59(e) is designed to circumvent. It would be grossly unfair if a law that has already been declared unconstitutional as 1 Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e) provides that any motion to amend a judgment shall be filed no later than 10 days after entry of the judgment. Final Judgment in this matter was entered on October 26, 2006, therefore the instant Motion is timely filed. The decision to alter or amend judgment is committed to the sound discretion of the district judge. American Home Assurance Co. v. Glenn Estess & Associates, Inc., 763 F.2d 1237, 1238-39 (11th Cir. 1985). Rule 59(e) exists to permit the Court to prevent manifest injustice. Wendy s International Inc., v. Nu-Cape Construction, Inc., 169 F.R.D. 680, 686 (M.D. Fla. 1996). PAGE 3

Case 106-cv-22463-PCH Document 35 Filed 10/27/2006 Page 4 of 7 to Plaintiffs exit polling behavior was still applied to that very behavior due to confusion over this Court s Declaratory Relief Order and Final Judgment. The proposed amendment to the Final Judgment and Declaratory Relief Order would merely clarify that all members of the defendant class of county Supervisors of Elections and their agents are bound by this Court s relief and ensure that Fla. Stat. 102.031(4)(a) will not be applied to Plaintiffs exit polling behavior in any county. For example, in CBS v. Smith, the Court, in ordering preliminary injunctive relief similar to the permanent injunctive relief granted herein specified in its Order, Defendant Jim Smith, in his official capacity as Secretary of State of the State of Florida and Defendant David Leahy as Supervisor of Elections of Dade County Florida, and all their officers, agents servants, employees and attorneys and all persons in active concert or participation with them who receive actual notice of this order by personal service or otherwise, including all supervisors of elections in the State of Florida, their officers, agents, servants, employees, and attorneys and all persons in active concert or participation with them who receive actual notice of this order by personal service or otherwise, are hereby prohibited and restrained until further order of this Court (emphasis added) CBS v. Smith, 681 F.Supp. 794, 806 (S.D. Fla 1988). 2 This same type of clarity is needed in the instant matter to facilitate Plaintiffs exercise of their constitutionally protected exit polling rights. CONCLUSION For the foregoing reasons, Plaintiffs respectfully request the Court amend its Declaratory Relief Order and Final Judgment pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 59 (e) and specify that all members of the defendant class of county Supervisors of Elections and their agents, in addition to the 2 The language of the Orders in other cases challenging exit polling restrictions in Florida are all similar to that employed by this Court in CBS v. Smith. See e.g. Clean-Up 84 v. Heinrich, 582 F.Supp. 125 (M.D. Fla. 1984); Florida Committee for Liability Reform v. McMillan, 682 F.Supp. 1536 (M.D. Fla. 1988). PAGE 4

Case 106-cv-22463-PCH Document 35 Filed 10/27/2006 Page 5 of 7 named defendants, are barred from enforcing Fla. Stat. 102.031(4)(a) as to Plaintiffs exit polling activities. WHEREFORE, the Plaintiffs CBS Broadcasting, Inc, American Broadcasting Companies, Inc., The Associated Press, Cable News Network, LP, LLLP, Fox News Network, L.L.C., and NBC Universal, Inc., respectfully request that this Honorable Court amend its Declaratory Relief Order and Final Judgment to specify that all members of the defendant class of county Supervisors of Elections and their agents, in addition to the named defendants, are barred from enforcing Fla. Stat. 102.031(4)(a) as to Plaintiffs exit polling behavior and provide such other and further relief as this Court deems just. Dated this day of, 2006. Respectfully Submitted, Co-Counsel for Plaintiffs Gunster, Yoakley & Stewart P.A. Attorneys for Plaintiffs Susan Buckley, Esq. One Biscayne Tower, Suite 3400 Brian Markley, Esq. 2 South Biscayne Boulevard 80 Pine Street Miami, Florida 33131 New York, New York 10005 Telephone (305) 376-6000 Facsimile (305) 376-6010 By /s/ Raymond V. Miller Florida Bar No. 328901 PAGE 5

Case 106-cv-22463-PCH Document 35 Filed 10/27/2006 Page 6 of 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA MIAMI DIVISION CBS BROADCASTING INC., AMERICAN BROADCASTING COMPANIES, INC., THE ASSOCIATED PRESS, CABLE NEWS NETWORK LP, LLLP, FOX NEWS NETWORK, L.L.C. and NBC UNIVERSAL, INC., Case No. 06-22463-CIV v. Plaintiffs, Huck, J./Simonton, MJ SUE M. COBB, in her official capacity as Secretary of State of the State of Florida, and LESTER SOLA, in his official capacity as the Supervisor of Elections of Miami-Dade County, Florida and as representative of a defendant class of all county Supervisors of Elections in the State of Florida, Defendants. / [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS MOTION TO AMEND JUDGMENT THIS MATTER is before the Court upon Plaintiffs Motion To Amend Final Judgment pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e), filed on October 27, 2006. The Court, having reviewed the motion and being otherwise duly advised on the premises, hereby ORDERS, Plaintiffs Motion to Amend Final Judgment is hereby GRANTED and an Amended Final Judgment shall be entered. Done in Chambers, Miami, Florida, October, 2006 Copies furnished to All Counsel of Record Honorable Paul C. Huck United States District Judge

Case 106-cv-22463-PCH Document 35 Filed 10/27/2006 Page 7 of 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA MIAMI DIVISION CBS BROADCASTING INC., AMERICAN BROADCASTING COMPANIES, INC., THE ASSOCIATED PRESS, CABLE NEWS NETWORK LP, LLLP, FOX NEWS NETWORK, L.L.C. and NBC UNIVERSAL, INC., Case No. 06-22463-CIV v. Plaintiffs, Huck, J./Simonton, MJ SUE M. COBB, in her official capacity as Secretary of State of the State of Florida, and LESTER SOLA, in his official capacity as the Supervisor of Elections of Miami-Dade County, Florida and as representative of a defendant class of all county Supervisors of Elections in the State of Florida, Defendants. / AMENDED FINAL JUDGMENT Pursuant to the Order Granting Plaintiffs Declaratory Judgment [D.E. #30], it is hereby ORDERED that Plaintiffs Request for Declaratory Relief and a Permanent Injunction is GRANTED. Defendants, Sue Cobb in her official capacity as Secretary of the State of Florida, Lester Sola in his official capacity as the Supervisor of Elections of Miami-Dade County, Florida, and all members of the defendant class of county Supervisors of Elections of the State of Florida and their agents and employees are barred from enforcing Fla. Stat. 102.031(4)(a) as applied to Plaintiffs exit-polling activities. The Court reserves jurisdiction over appropriate motions for attorneys fees and costs. The Clerk of the Court is directed to mark this case CLOSED and DENY all pending motions as moot. DONE in Chamber, Miami, Florida, this day of October, 2006. Copies furnished to Counsel of Record Paul C. Huck United States District Judge