COMPLAINT FOR VIOLATIONS OF THE LANHAM ACT AND TRADEMARK INFRINGMENT

Similar documents
COMPLAINT FOR VIOLATIONS OF THE LANHAM ACT AND TRADEMARK INFRINGMENT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE WESTERN DIVISION COMPLAINT

Case 9:18-cv RLR Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/22/2018 Page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION

Case3:15-cv DMR Document1 Filed09/16/15 Page1 of 11

Case 9:13-cv KLR Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/19/2013 Page 1 of 17 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA. Case No.

Case 1:16-cv GAO Document 1 Filed 07/29/16 Page 1 of 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS COMPLAINT AND JURY DEMAND PARTIES

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION COMPLAINT

Case 3:17-cv JCH Document 1 Filed 11/13/17 Page 1 of 12 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT. Case No.

Case 1:07-cv LTS Document 1 Filed 03/15/2007 Page 1 of 20

Case 2:17-cv EJF Document 2 Filed 10/02/17 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF UTAH CENTRAL DIVISION

Case 1:13-cv CMA Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/30/2013 Page 1 of 17

Case 3:15-cv AA Document 1 Filed 01/12/15 Page 1 of 17

USDC IN/ND case 2:18-cv JVB-APR document 1 filed 05/16/18 page 1 of 10

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA GAINESVILLE DIVISION

Case 0:10-cv MJD-FLN Document 1 Filed 04/06/10 Page 1 of 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA. Court File No.

Case 1:18-cv Document 1 Filed 05/22/18 Page 1 of 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS COMPLAINT AND JURY DEMAND

Case 2:12-cv JCM-VCF Document 1 Filed 11/13/12 Page 1 of 10

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA JOHN JOSEPH BENGIS, an individual,

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, WESTERN DIVISION. Case No. COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES, RESTITUTION AND INJUNCTIVE RELIEF

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO COMPLAINT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA. Civil Action No. 07-CV-571

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) COMPLAINT (Jury Trial Demanded)

Case 2:15-cv Document 1 Filed 04/06/15 Page 1 of 14 Page ID #:1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 5:14-cv Document 1 Filed 11/06/14 Page 1 of 12 Page ID #:1

Case 2:18-cv JAD-CWH Document 1 Filed 12/21/18 Page 1 of 17

Case 1:15-cv Document 1 Filed 02/27/15 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS. COMPLAINT and Jury Demand

Case 2:13-cv RJS Document 2 Filed 03/06/13 Page 1 of 16

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 1 COMPLAINT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Case 1:17-cv JCH-JHR Document 17 Filed 03/31/17 Page 1 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SAN ANTONIO DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION

Case 2:17-cv JFW-JC Document 1 Filed 10/13/17 Page 1 of 11 Page ID #:1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) COMPLAINT

Plaintiff Privacy Pop, LLC ( Plaintiff ) complains and alleges as follows against Defendant Gimme Gimme, LLC ( Defendant ).

Case 1:14-cv RWZ Document 1 Filed 05/08/14 Page 1 of 19 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA

Case 1:10-cv JLT Document 1 Filed 01/22/2010 Page 1 of 15 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

PlainSite. Legal Document. New York Southern District Court Case No. 1:16-cv Vale v. Cava et al. Document 7. View Document.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA ASHEVILLE DIVISION CIVIL ACTION NO.: 1:16-CV-381 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION : : : : : : : : : :

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA ASHEVILLE DIVISION CIVIL ACTION NO.: 1:16-CV-165 ) ) ) ) ) ) )

THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION

Case 2:07-cv CM-JPO Document 1 Filed 07/30/2007 Page 1 of 12 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS

Case 1:18-cv Document 1 Filed 01/29/18 Page 1 of 14

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA C O M P L A I N T. COMES NOW, Plaintiff, JUAN ANTONIO CASTRO RIOS, (hereinafter

Case: 2:17-cv MHW-KAJ Doc #: 1 Filed: 03/23/17 Page: 1 of 15 PAGEID #: 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA CHARLOTTE DIVISION Civil Action No.: 3:17-CV-398.

Case 3:18-cv HEH Document 1 Filed 05/30/18 Page 1 of 20 PageID# 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA CHARLOTTE DIVISION

Case 5:14-cv HE Document 1 Filed 10/20/14 Page 1 of 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA

Case 1:18-cv WJM-KLM Document 1 Filed 11/07/18 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Case 3:16-cv Document 1 Filed 04/18/16 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO. Case No.

3 James A. McDaniel (Bar No ) 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

Case 8:18-cv Document 1 Filed 08/07/18 Page 1 of 26 Page ID #:1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 11/24/ :27 PM INDEX NO /2015 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 57 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 11/24/2015 EXHIBIT C

Case: 1:16-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 03/07/16 Page 1 of 10 PageID #:1

Case 2:17-cv Document 1 Filed 07/31/17 Page 1 of 10 Page ID #:1

Case: 1:18-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 06/08/18 Page 1 of 15 PageID #:1

Case 2:12-cv TC Document 2 Filed 12/10/12 Page 1 of 16

Case: 1:11-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 08/10/11 Page 1 of 19 PageID #:1

Attorneys for Plaintiffs LARRY KING ENTERPRISES, INC. and ORA MEDIA LLC

THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA WESTERN DIVISION Case No: 5:11-cv ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case: 4:16-cv DDN Doc. #: 1 Filed: 07/15/16 Page: 1 of 9 PageID #: 1

Case 2:15-cv Document 1 Filed 09/24/15 Page 1 of 12 Page ID #:1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA CASE NO:

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA WESTERN DIVISION No. 5:13-CV-679 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Plaintiffs,

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Case 1:11-cv REB Document 1 Filed 12/15/11 Page 1 of 5

USDC IN/ND case 1:18-cv document 1 filed 04/09/18 page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA FORT WAYNE DIVISION

Case 3:17-cv Document 1 Filed 12/18/17 Page 1 of 8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF UTAH, CENTRAL DIVISION : : : : : : : : : :

Case 1:07-cv MRB Document 6 Filed 11/06/2007 Page 1 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION

Attorney for Plaintiff TIPSY ELVES LLC UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Hells Angels Motorcycle Corporation v. Alexander McQueen Trading Limited et al Doc. 1 Dockets.Justia.com

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI SOUTHERN DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA WESTERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

Case 1:11-cv JRH -WLB Document 1 Filed 07/21/11 Page 1 of 6

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION

Case 3:08-cv VRW Document 11 Filed 05/22/2008 Page 1 of 9

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE COMPLAINT

Case 2:17-cv JLL-JAD Document 1 Filed 05/12/17 Page 1 of 17 PageID: 1

Case 1:10-cv Document 1 Filed 03/24/10 Page 1 of 15 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

Case 2:09-cv LDG-RJJ Document 1 Filed 11/06/2009 Page 1 of 15

Case 1:18-cv NLH-KMW Document 1 Filed 06/22/18 Page 1 of 18 PageID: 1

Case: 4:13-cv Doc. #: 1 Filed: 08/01/13 Page: 1 of 15 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF RHODE ISLAND. v. C.A. No. COMPLAINT FOR PATENT AND TRADE DRESS INFRINGEMENT. Nature of the Action

PlainSite. Legal Document. California Central District Court Case No. 2:16-cv WBS, Inc. v. Stephen Pearcy et al. Document 2.

Case 2:16-cv JRG-RSP Document 1 Filed 10/19/16 Page 1 of 8 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

Transcription:

Case 2:07-cv-04024-JF Document 1 Filed 09/26/2007 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA SIGNATURES NETWORK, INC. : a Delaware corporation, : : Plaintiff, : : Civil Action vs. : No. : VARIOUS JOHN DOES, individuals, : VARIOUS JANE DOES, individuals, : and XYZ COMPANY, business : entity form unknown, inclusive, : : Defendants. : COMPLAINT FOR VIOLATIONS OF THE LANHAM ACT AND TRADEMARK INFRINGMENT Plaintiff Signatures Network, Inc., by its attorneys, files this complaint against defendants, alleging as follows: JURISDICTION AND VENUE 1. This action arises under the Lanham Trademark Act 15 U.S.C. 1051 et seq. (the "Lanham Act"). Accordingly, this Court has federal question jurisdiction over the subject matter of this action pursuant to 15 U.S.C. 1221 and 28 U.S.C. 1338(a), (b). Venue in this district is proper under 28 U.S.C. 1391(b). PARTIES 2. Signatures Network, Inc. ("Plaintiff") is a Delaware corporation with its principal place of business in San Francisco, California. 3. Defendants Various John Does 1-100, Various Jane Does 1-100 and XYZ Company who are sued herein under fictitious names because their true names and 1

Case 2:07-cv-04024-JF Document 1 Filed 09/26/2007 Page 2 of 7 capacities are unknown at this time. This complaint will be amended when their true names and capacities are ascertained. 4. Upon information and belief, the individual defendants will be present in and about the Eastern District of Pennsylvania in connection with the claims asserted below and are or will be subject to the jurisdiction of this Court. 5. On information and belief, defendant XYZ Company through its agents, servants and employees, is or will be present in and about the Eastern District of Pennsylvania and is or will be subject to the jurisdiction of this Court. 6. Defendants, and each of them, are individuals and business entities who, upon information and belief, are acting in concert and active participation with each other in committing the wrongful acts alleged herein. 7. Defendants Various John Does 1-100, Various Jane Does 1-100, and XYZ Company are hereinafter referred to collectively as "Defendants." THE BACKGROUND OF THE ACTION 8. Plaintiff is engaged in the manufacture, distribution and sale of various types of merchandise sold and distributed at concerts and at retail stores of musical performing artists and groups, including, but not limited to tour and program books, T- shirts, jerseys, sweatshirts, hats, visors, buttons and posters (collectively "Merchandise") which embody the names, likenesses and trademarks of various musical performers and groups. 9. The group known as BRUCE SPRINGSTEEN & THE E STREET BAND (the "Artist"), is the tradename used by this musical group in connection with their performing, recording, merchandising and other related goods in all aspects of the 2

Case 2:07-cv-04024-JF Document 1 Filed 09/26/2007 Page 3 of 7 entertainment industry and to distinguish their services from all other such artists. The Artist has used their mark in connection with their recording and performing services for nearly 30 years. The Artist has obtained for its BRUCE SPRINGSTEEN & THE E STREET BAND trademark U.S. Trademark Registration: No. 1697409, International Class ( IC ) 009 for use in connection with sound and video recordings featuring music and IC 041 for use in connection with entertainment services in the nature of a musical group. The mark was registered over 10 years ago and has become incontestable. 10. Pursuant to an agreement between the Artist and Plaintiff (the "Agreement"), Plaintiff possesses the exclusive right to utilize all federally registered trademarks, service marks, trade names, likenesses and logos of the Artist (collectively, the "Artist s Trademarks") on and in connection with Merchandise ("Tour Merchandise") sold and offered for sale in the vicinity of the Artist s concerts on their present North American concert tour (the "Tour"). 11. The Artist has a decidedly strong and loyal following among those who attend popular music concerts and record buyers. The Artist has appeared in concerts at major arenas and stadiums in the United States, Canada, and throughout the world and the Artists has been seen and heard in concert by millions of popular music enthusiasts. The Artist has sold over 60 million units of recordings. 12. The Artist s previous tours were attended by hundreds of thousands of people. The Artist is so popular that many performances for this Tour are nearly sold out. 13. As a result of the foregoing, each of the Artist s Trademarks has developed and now possesses secondary and distinctive meaning to purchasers of the Tour Merchandise bearing any or all of the Artist s Trademarks. 3

Case 2:07-cv-04024-JF Document 1 Filed 09/26/2007 Page 4 of 7 14. Plaintiff and the Artist annually realize substantial income from the sale of the Tour Merchandise bearing the Artist s Trademarks, and hundreds of thousands of such items have been sold throughout the United States. 15. On October 5 and 6, 2007, at the Wachovia Center in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, the Artist will perform (the "Concerts"). 16. Pursuant to the Agreement, the Artist has granted to Plaintiff the exclusive right to market articles of clothing and other Tour Merchandise bearing any or all of the Artist s Trademarks at or near the site of the Concerts and at all other arenas and stadiums in which the Tour will perform. The authorized Tour Merchandise bearing any or all of the Artist s Trademarks will be distributed throughout the United States in connection with the Tour. DEFENDANTS' UNLAWFUL CONDUCT 17. On information and belief, Defendants will sell and distribute unauthorized T-shirts, jerseys, caps and/or other merchandise bearing any or all of the Artist s Trademarks (the "Unauthorized Merchandise") in the vicinity of the Concerts before, during and after their performance, and at subsequent concerts during the Tour. 18. The Unauthorized Merchandise is of the same general appearance as Plaintiff's Merchandise and is likely to cause confusion among prospective purchasers. Defendants' Unauthorized Merchandise is not authorized by the Artist or Plaintiff. 19. The Unauthorized Merchandise sold and to be sold by Defendants is generally of inferior quality. The sale of such merchandise has injured and is likely to injure the reputation of the Artist which has developed by virtue of their public 4

Case 2:07-cv-04024-JF Document 1 Filed 09/26/2007 Page 5 of 7 performances and the reputation for high quality associated with Plaintiff and its Tour Merchandise. 20. The aforesaid acts by Defendants and others are likely to cause the purchasing public to believe that the sale of such Unauthorized Merchandise is authorized, sponsored or approved by the Artist and/or Plaintiff and that such Unauthorized Merchandise is subject to the same quality control and regulation required by the Artist and/or Plaintiff, despite the fact that this is not true. It also injures Artist and Plaintiff in that Defendants do not have to pay any royalty for these unlawful sales. 21. The aforesaid manufacture, distribution and sale of Unauthorized Merchandise bearing the names, trademarks and/or likenesses of the Artist constitutes a false designation of the source of origin of such goods and falsely describes and represents such merchandise. The use by Defendants and others of the Artist s Trademark also constitutes an attempt to palm off and appropriate to themselves the Artist s and Plaintiff's exclusive rights therein. 22. Upon information and belief, Defendants and others have and will continue to engage in such unauthorized activities in this state and elsewhere in interstate commerce and are likely to continue such activities throughout the Tour, to the great injury of Plaintiff and the Artist. 23. Plaintiff has no adequate remedy at law and will suffer irreparable harm and damage as a result of the aforesaid acts, in an amount presently incalculable. 5

Case 2:07-cv-04024-JF Document 1 Filed 09/26/2007 Page 6 of 7 FIRST CLAIM FOR RELIEF (Violation of the Lanham Act) 24. Plaintiff realleges each allegation set forth in the paragraphs above. 25. By reason of the foregoing, Plaintiff hereby asserts a claim against Defendants for injunctive and monetary relief pursuant to Section 43(a) of the Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C. 1125(a), with regards to the false designation of origin and false descriptions and representations in commerce of Defendants Unauthorized Merchandise. SECOND CLAIM FOR RELIEF (Infringement of Registered Trademark) 26. Plaintiff realleges each allegation set forth in the paragraphs above. 27. By reason of the foregoing, Plaintiff hereby asserts a claim against Defendants for injunctive and monetary relief pursuant to 15 U.S.C. 1114(b) with respect to Defendants' infringement of the registered mark. as follows: PRAYER FOR RELIEF WHEREFORE, plaintiff, Signatures Network, Inc. seeks relief against Defendants A. As to All Claims For Relief, that Defendants, their agents, servants, employees, officers, attorneys, successors and assigns, and all persons acting in concert with them, be enjoined in this and all other judicial districts in the United States, preliminarily during the course of this litigation and permanently from: 1) manufacturing, distributing, selling, offering for sale, holding for sale or advertising any products, merchandise or goods bearing the name, trademark, or likeness of the Artist or any colorable variation or imitation thereof; and 2) representing that any products, merchandise or goods manufactured, distributed, sold, held for sale or advertised by them 6

Case 2:07-cv-04024-JF Document 1 Filed 09/26/2007 Page 7 of 7 is sponsored or authorized by Plaintiff in this district or in any other district in which Plaintiff seeks to enforce this Court's injunction order. B. As to All Claims For Relief, that this Court order the United States Marshal, the local and state police or sheriff, off duty officers of the same, authorized agents of Plaintiff, and/or any persons acting under their supervision to seize and impound any and all Unauthorized Merchandise which the Defendants attempt to sell, distribute or hold for sale at, within or in the vicinity of the arenas at which the Artist is performing, whether this occurs before, during or after the concerts on the Tour. C. That Defendants deliver up for destruction any and all Unauthorized Merchandise. D. As to All Claims For Relief, that Defendants pay to Plaintiff damages in an amount to be determined. E. As to All Claims For Relief, that Plaintiff be awarded its costs, attorneys fees and such other and further relief as the Court deems to be just and proper. Dated: September 25, 2007 Respectfully Submitted /s/ Theodore Naccarella Theodore Naccarella (Atty. No. 81713) Joseph F. Posillico (Atty. No. 45189) SYNNESTVEDT & LECHNER LLP 1101 Market Street, Suite 2600 Philadelphia, PA 19107 (215) 923-4466 - Telephone (215) 923-2189 Facsimile Cara R. Burns, Esq. (Pro Hac Vice Pending) HICKS MIMS KAPLAN & BURNS 2800 28 th Street, Ste 300 Santa Monica, California 90405 (310) 314-1721 - Telephone (310) 314-1725 Facsimile Attorneys for Signatures Network, Inc. 7