Case 7:16-cv KMK Document 75 Filed 10/17/17 Page 1 of 11

Similar documents
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

Case 1:17-cv AT Document 77 Filed 09/14/18 Page 1 of 12

Case: 1:12-cv Document #: 576 Filed: 07/06/17 Page 1 of 15 PageID #:22601

Case4:13-cv YGR Document104 Filed05/12/15 Page1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case: 1:14-cv Document #: 58 Filed: 11/10/15 Page 1 of 10 PageID #:314

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

ORDER PRELIMINARILY APPROVING CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT, DIRECTING NOTICE, AND SCHEDULING FINAL APPROVAL HEARING

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

Case 3:09-cv JPG-PMF Document 47 Filed 01/11/11 Page 1 of 7 Page ID #466

Case 1:14-cv VEC Document 259 Filed 01/24/17 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Case: 1:15-cv Document #: 47 Filed: 10/11/16 Page 1 of 8 PageID #:299

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

Case: 1:17-cv Document #: 25 Filed: 10/18/17 Page 1 of 8 PageID #:156 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

Case: 1:14-cv Document #: 266 Filed: 10/05/17 Page 1 of 12 PageID #:5588

Case: 4:16-cv ERW Doc. #: 95 Filed: 12/15/17 Page: 1 of 10 PageID #: 734

Case 2:17-cv JFB-SIL Document 16 Filed 07/14/17 Page 1 of 4 PageID #: 71

Case 4:10-cv YGR Document Filed 06/17/16 Page 1 of 11

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA. ORDER This matter came before the Court on the Plaintiffs Motion for Modification of

Case 5:05-cv RMW Document 97 Filed 08/08/2007 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case 9:14-cv WPD Document 251 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/10/2017 Page 1 of 16 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA INDIANAPOLIS DIVISION

[QIJ$&J ORDER PRELIMINARILY APPROVING SETTLEMENT AND

[Proposedi Order Granting Motion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. TJ H Case No. 5:15-cv ~jc~-gjs

Case: 1:12-cv Document #: 117 Filed: 08/12/14 Page 1 of 11 PageID #:706

Case 1:12-cv VEC Document 186 Filed 05/27/15 Page 1 of 11. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK x

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case 3:14-cv PGS-LHG Document 130 Filed 05/14/18 Page 1 of 9 PageID: 4283

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

Case3:11-cv EMC Document70 Filed03/06/14 Page1 of 43

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION ORDER PRELIMINARILY APPROVING SETTLEMENT AND PROVIDING FOR NOTICE

Case 7:13-cv NSR-LMS Document 132 Filed 11/01/17 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Case: 1:13-cv Document #: 52 Filed: 12/23/14 Page 1 of 9 PageID #:463

Case 1:12-cv JSR Document 63 Filed 11/12/14 Page 1 of 13

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION

Case 2:17-cv GAM Document 56 Filed 03/23/18 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Case 7:16-cv KMK Document 87 Filed 02/01/18 Page 1 of 7

Case 0:13-cv JIC Document 318 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/30/2016 Page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

1:1_ (I f 0 HiIiB} ORDER PRELIMINARILY APPROVING PROPOSED SETTLEMENT AND PROVIDING FOR NOTICE

Case 2:08-cv SHM-dkv Document 327 Filed 06/23/14 Page 1 of 23 PageID 8969

Case 1:15-cv WHP Document 148 Filed 06/28/18 Page 1 of 14

nm OPOREPJYINAL JUDGMENT AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE

Case 1:15-cv YK Document 84 Filed 05/31/18 Page 1 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

mg Doc 4808 Filed 08/23/13 Entered 08/23/13 08:51:55 Main Document Pg 1 of 12

Case 2:16-cv JMA-SIL Document 5 Filed 12/27/16 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 88 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Case 2:03-cv RCJ-PAL Document 2907 Filed 06/05/17 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI WESTERN DIVISION

Case 0:11-cv CMA Document 161 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/18/2015 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

Case 3:17-cv JAG Document 41 Filed 02/21/18 Page 1 of 8 PageID# 258

Case 1:09-cv SAS Document 59-1 Filed 06/28/11 Page 1 of 9 EXHIBIT A

Case 1:15-cv ELR Document 60 Filed 09/08/16 Page 1 of 21

Case 3:15-cv RBL Document 214 Filed 05/16/18 Page 1 of 8

Case Case 1:10-cv AKH Document Document Filed 03/16/15 03/13/15 Page 11of9

GRANTED WITH MODIFICATIONS

Case 4:13-cv YGR Document 126 Filed 09/07/16 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CIV CIV DS MISC ORDER GRANTING PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF SETTLEMENT AND FINAL JUDGMENT filed

Case 1:09-cv RB-RHS Document 139 Filed 11/01/13 Page 1 of 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA CHARLOTTE DIVISION 3:18-cv RJC

Case 2:11-cv JLL-MAH Document 69 Filed 02/22/13 Page 1 of 11 PageID: 739

Case: 4:16-cv JAR Doc. #: 97 Filed: 12/13/18 Page: 1 of 10 PageID #: 2279

Case 2:07-cv KJD-RJJ Document 95 Filed 02/04/10 Page 1 of 9

Case 5:12-cv SOH Document 457 Filed 04/08/19 Page 1 of 9 PageID #: 12296


Case 1:15-cv JFK Document 114 Filed 11/05/18 Page 1 of 12 Case 1:15-cv JFK Document Filed 10/30/18 Page 2 of 13

Case 3:12-cv DRH-SCW Document 942 Filed 09/04/18 Page 1 of 9 Page ID #40056

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

FINAL JUDGMENT AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE

Case: 1:17-cv Document #: 88 Filed: 07/06/18 Page 1 of 14 PageID #:1135

Case 2:14-cv MCE-KJN Document 87 Filed 07/08/16 Page 1 of 14

SUSAN DOHERTY and DWIGHT SIMONSON, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, Civil Action No. l:10-cv nlh-kmw

Case: 1:15-cv Document #: 169 Filed: 12/01/17 Page 1 of 7 PageID #:2786

GRANTED WITH MODIFICATIONS

Case 1:02-cv LJM-WTL Document 117 Filed 08/16/2005 Page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA INDIANAPOLIS DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION. Plaintiffs, Case No. 1:16-CV MHC

I ELECTRONICALLY FILED

Case 3:15-cv VAB Document 46 Filed 05/20/16 Page 1 of 52

Case 2:11-cv JLL-JAD Document 81 Filed 10/03/13 Page 1 of 7 PageID: 963

Case 7:15-cv AT-LMS Document 129 Filed 05/04/18 Page 1 of 8

Plaintiff, Defendant. for Denbury Resources, Inc. ("Denbury" or "Defendant") shares pursuant to the merger of

Case 3:11-md DMS-RBB Document 108 Filed 12/18/12 Page 1 of 12

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF JACKSON COUNTY, MISSOURI, AT INDEPENDENCE

Case3:14-cv MMC Document53 Filed06/26/15 Page1 of 10

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION

Case 1:12-cv GBD Document 47 Filed 01/19/16 Page 1 of 13

Case 0:16-cv WPD Document 101 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/24/2017 Page 1 of 12

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO. Plaintiff, j Judge: Hon. Joan M. Lewis ) ) )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION

FINALLY CERTIFYING A CLASS

Case 3:14-cv JAG Document 193 Filed 01/30/17 Page 1 of 9 PageID# 4730 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA

1,=-= := usns son~ 1,.!oocume?~t " LEl'TRONICALLY fl.led i!

: 04 MD 1653 (LAK) CORRECTED ORDER CONCERNING PROPOSED SETTLEMENT WITH DEFENDANT BNL AND THE CREDIT SUISSE DEFENDANTS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT IOC SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YOR. This matter came before the Court for hearing pursuant to this Court's Order Granting

Case: 1:13-cv Document #: 382 Filed: 03/08/18 Page 1 of 14 PageID #:7778

Case 3:14-cv SI Document 240 Filed 11/21/17 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF OREGON

Case 3:13-cv HSG Document Filed 03/17/16 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

2:14-cv CAS-JEM Document 38 Filed 04/27/15 Page 1 of 11 Page ID #: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

USDC SDNY DOCUMENT ELECTRONICALLY FILED DOC #: DATE FILED: //y/20/0

Transcription:

Case 7:16-cv-01812-KMK Document 75 Filed 10/17/17 Page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK... ~..,-... ~. d,j\...t - -------- l ;1 SHANNON TAYLOR, individually and on behalf of - ---- -- :1..--:-:-"'.;--- -:.:..:.1 all others similarly situated, Plaintiff, Civil Action No. 16-cv-01812-KMK v. TRUSTED MEDIA BRANDS, INC., Defendant. -f'proposed] ORDER GRANTING PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT, CERTIFYING SETTLEMENT CLASS, APPOINTING CLASS REPRESENTATIVE, APPOINTING CLASS COUNSEL, AND APPROVING NOTICE PLAN WHEREAS, a class action is pending before the Court entitled Taylor v. Trusted Media Brands, Inc., No. 7:16-cv-01812-KMK; and WHEREAS, Plaintiff Shannon Taylor and Defendant Trusted Media Brands, Inc. have entered into a Class Action Settlement Agreement, which, together with the exhibits attached thereto, sets forth the terms and conditions for a proposed settlement and dismissal of the Action with prejudice as to Defendant upon the terms and conditions set forth therein (the "Settlement Agreement"), and the Court having read and considered the Settlement Agreement and exhibits attached to; This matter coming before the Court upon the agreement of the parties, good cause being shown, and the Court being fully advised in the premises, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, DECREED, AND ADJUDGED AS FOLLOWS: 1. Terms and phrases in this Order shall have the same meaning as ascribed to them in the Settlement Agreement. 2. The Parties have moved the Court for an order approving the settlement of the

Case 7:16-cv-01812-KMK Document 75 Filed 10/17/17 Page 2 of 11 Action in accordance with the Settlement Agreement, which, together with the documents incorporated therein, sets forth the terms and conditions for a proposed settlement and dismissal of the Action with prejudice, and the Court having read and considered the Settlement Agreement and having heard the parties and being fully advised in the premises, hereby preliminarily approves the Settlement Agreement in its entirety subject to the Final Approval Hearing referred to in paragraph 20 of this Order. 3. This Court finds that it has jurisdiction over the subject matter of this action and over all Parties to the Action. 4. The Court finds that, subject to the Final Approval Hearing, the Settlement Agreement is fair, reasonable, and adequate, within the range of possible approval, and in the best interests of the Settlement Class set forth below. The Court further finds that the Settlement Agreement substantially fulfills the purposes and objectives of the class action, and provides substantial relief to the Settlement Class without the risks, burdens, costs, or delay associated with continued litigation, trial, and/or appeal. The Court also finds that the Settlement Agreement (a) is the result of arm's-length negotiations between experienced class action attorneys; (b) is sufficient to warrant notice of the settlement and the Final Approval Hearing to be disseminated to the Settlement Class; ( c) meets all applicable requirements of law, including Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23 and the Class Action Fairness Act ("CAF A"), 28 U.S.C. 1715; and ( d) is not a finding or admission of liability by the Defendant or any other person, nor a finding of the validity of any claims asserted in the Action or of any wrongdoing or any violation of law. Final Approval Hearing 5. The Final Approval Hearing shall be held before this Court on 2

Case 7:16-cv-01812-KMK Document 75 Filed 10/17/17 Page 3 of 11 Courtroom 521 at the Federal Building and United States Courthouse, 300 Quarropas Street, White Plains, New York to determine (a) whether the proposed settlement of the Action on the terms and conditions provided for in the Settlement Agreement is fair, reasonable, and adequate and should be given final approval by the Court; (b) whether a judgment and order of dismissal with prejudice should be entered; (c) whether to approve the payment of attorneys' fees and expenses to Class Counsel; and ( d) whether to approve the payment of an incentive award to the Class Representative. The Court may adjourn the Final Approval Hearing without further notice to members of the Settlement Class. 6. Class Counsel shall file papers in support of their Fee Award and Class Representatives' Incentive Awards (collectively, the "Fee Petition") with the Court on or before 'hctm'\~c C01, ZDlt [su~~~.yj fondant may, but is not required to, file a response to Class 2'i 1<11~ Counsel's Fee Petition with the Court on or before O..., ~ ' [ s><gj;r!sreu' dute ef I tilryw-' ~ before Finu{-Apptoral he~] Class Counsel may file a reply in support of their Fee Petition with the Court on or before f 1 f1 '( [s s in /!pp 'QVal e he~.] 7. Papers in support of final approval of the Settlement Agreement and any supplementation to the Fee Petition shall be filed with the Court on or before I /11 /I, 8. For purposes of settlement only: (a) Bursor & Fisher, P.A. is appointed Class Counsel for the Settlement Class; and (b) Shannon Taylor is named Class Representative. The 3

Case 7:16-cv-01812-KMK Document 75 Filed 10/17/17 Page 4 of 11 Court finds that these attorneys are competent and capable of exercising the responsibilities of Class Counsel and that Plaintiff Taylor will adequately protect the interests of the Settlement Class defined below. 9. For purposes of settlement only, the Court conditionally certifies the following Settlement Class as defined in the Settlement Agreement: [A]ll Persons with a Michigan street address who subscribed to a TMBI Publication to be delivered to a Michigan street address between March 10, 2010 and July 30, 2016. 10. The Court finds, subject to the Final Approval Hearing referred to in Paragraph 20 below, that the Settlement Agreement is fundamentally fair, adequate, and reasonable, and, solely within the context of and for the purposes of settlement only, that the Settlement Class satisfies the requirements of Rule 23 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, specifically, that: the Settlement Class is so numerous that joinder of all members is impracticable; there are questions of fact and law common to the Settlement Class (e,g., whether Defendant unlawfully disclosed to third parties Plaintiffs and the Settlement Class's Subscriber Information without consent in a manner that violated the Michigan Preservation of Personal Privacy Act, M.C.L. 445.1712, et al. ("PPPA"), and whether Plaintiff and the Settlement Class members are entitled to uniform statutory damages under the PPPA); the claims of the Class Representative are typical of the claims of the members of the Settlement Class; the Class Representative and Class Counsel will fairly and adequately protect the interests of the members of the Settlement Class; common questions of law or fact predominate over questions affecting individual members; and a class action is a superior method for fairly and efficiently adjudicating the Action. 11. If the Settlement Agreement does not receive the Court's final approval, or if final approval is reversed on appeal, or if the Settlement Agreement is terminated or otherwise fails to 4

Case 7:16-cv-01812-KMK Document 75 Filed 10/17/17 Page 5 of 11 become effective, the Court's grant of class certification shall be vacated, and the Class Representative and the Settlement Class will once again bear the burden of establishing the propriety of class certification. In such case, neither the certification of the Settlement Class for settlement purposes, nor any other act relating to the negotiation or execution of the Settlement Agreement shall be considered as a factor in connection with any class certification issue(s). Notice and Administration 12. The Court approves, as to form, content, and distribution, the Notice Plan set forth in the Settlement Agreement, including Claim Form attached to the Settlement Agreement as Exhibit A, the Notice Plan and all forms of Notice to the Settlement Class as set forth in the Settlement Agreement and Exhibits B, C, and D thereto, and finds that such Notice is the best notice practicable under the circumstances, and that the Notice complies fully with the requirements of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The Court also finds that the Notice constitutes valid, due and sufficient notice to all persons entitled thereto, and meets the requirements of Due Process. The Court further finds that the Notice is reasonably calculated to, under all circumstances, reasonably apprise members of the Settlement Class of the pendency of this action, the terms of the Settlement Agreement, and the right to object to the settlement and to exclude themselves from the Settlement Class. In addition, the Court finds that no notice other than that specifically identified in the Settlement Agreement is necessary in this Action. The Parties, by agreement, may revise the Notice and Claim Form in ways that are not material, or in ways that are appropriate to update those documents for purposes of accuracy or formatting. 13. The Parties shall jointly select a reputable administration company to serve as the Settlement Administrator. This Court hereby appoints and authorizes the Settlement Administrator to perform and execute all responsibilities set forth in the Settlement Agreement. 5

Case 7:16-cv-01812-KMK Document 75 Filed 10/17/17 Page 6 of 11 14. Pursuant to paragraph 4.1 of the Settlement Agreement, the Settlement Administrator is directed to publish the Notice and Claim Form on the Settlement Website and to send direct notice via U.S. Mail and email in accordance with the Notice Plan called for by the Settlement Agreement. The Settlement Administrator shall also maintain the Settlement Website to provide full information about the Settlement and allow for the filing of claims online. Submission of Claims and Requests for Exclusion from Class 15. Members of the Class who wish to receive benefits under the Settlement Agreement must complete and submit a timely and valid Claim Form(s) in accordance with the instructions contained therein. All Claim Forms must be postmarked or received by the Settlement Administrator within forty-five (45) days after the date of the entry of the Final Judgment. 16. Any person falling within the definition of the Settlement Class may, upon valid and timely request, exclude themselves or "opt out" from the Class. Any such person may do so if, on or before the Objection/Exclusion Deadline of I ;J.. j a. J / J 1- [sugge&t 0 d date~j 66 days ajterenuy r'jj-'this Orbk.r] they comply with the exclusion procedures set forth in the Settlement Agreement and Notice. Any members of the Class so excluded shall neither be bound by the terms of the Settlement Agreement nor entitled to any of its benefits. 17. Any members of the Settlement Class who elect to exclude themselves or "opt out" of the Settlement Agreement must file a written request with the Settlement Administrator, received or postmarked no later than the Objection/Exclusion Deadline. The request for exclusion must comply with the exclusion procedures set forth in the Settlement Agreement and Notice and include the Settlement Class member's name and address, the name of the Trusted Media Brands, Inc. publication to which he or she is a subscriber, a signature, the name and 6

Case 7:16-cv-01812-KMK Document 75 Filed 10/17/17 Page 7 of 11 number of the case, and a statement that he or she wishes to be excluded from the Settlement Class for the purposes of this Settlement. Each request for exclusion must be submitted individually. So called "mass" or "class" opt-outs shall not be allowed. 18. Individuals who opt out of the Class relinquish all rights to benefits under the Settlement Agreement and will not release their claims. However, members of the Settlement Class who fail to submit a valid and timely request for exclusion shall be bound by all terms of the Settlement Agreement and the Final Judgment, regardless of whether they have requested exclusion from the Settlement Agreement. Appearances and Objections 19. At least twenty-one (21) calendar days before the Settlement Hearing, any person who falls within the definition of the Settlement Class and who does not request exclusion from the Class may enter an appearance in the Action, at their own expense, individually or through counsel of their own choice. Any Settlement Class Member who does not enter an appearance will be represented by Class Counsel. 20. Any members of the Settlement Class who have not timely filed a request for exclusion may object to the fairness, reasonableness, or adequacy of the Settlement Agreement or to a Final Judgment being entered dismissing the Action with prejudice in accordance with the terms of the Settlement Agreement, or to the attorneys' fees and expense reimbursement sought by Class Counsel in the amounts specified in the Notice, or to the award to the Class Representatives as set forth in the Notice and Settlement Agreement. At least fourteen (14) days prior to the Objection/Exclusion Deadline, papers supporting the Fee Award shall be filed with the court and posted to the settlement website. Members of the Class may object on their own, or may do so through separate counsel at their own expense. 7

Case 7:16-cv-01812-KMK Document 75 Filed 10/17/17 Page 8 of 11 21. To object, members of the Class must sign and file a written objection no later than on or before the Objection/Exclusion Deadline of I 1---+-/_z.._1_/_L_:+~--- [s~ da~ays-ofler entry of this Order]. To be valid, the objection must comply with the objection procedures set forth in the Settlement Agreement and Notice, and include his or her name and address; an explanation of the basis upon which he or she claims to be a Settlement Class Member, including the Trusted Media Brands, Inc. publication to which he or she is or was a subscriber; a signature; all grounds for the objection, including all citations to legal authority and evidence supporting the objection; the name and contact information of any and all attorneys representing, advising, or in any way assisting him or her in connection with the preparation or submission of the objection or who may profit from the pursuit of the objection (the "Objecting Attorneys"); and a statement indicating whether he or she intends to appear at the Final Approval Hearing (either personally or through counsel who files an appearance with the Court in accordance with Southern District of New York Local Rules). If a Settlement Class Member or any of the Objecting Attorneys has objected to any class action settlement where the objector or the Objecting Attorneys asked for or received any payment in exchange for dismissal of the objection, or any related appeal, without any modification to the settlement, then the objection must include a statement identifying each such case by full case caption. 22. Members of the Class who fail to file and serve timely written objections in compliance with the requirements of this paragraph and the Settlement Agreement shall be deemed to have waived any objections and shall be foreclosed from making any objections (whether by appeal or otherwise) to the Settlement Agreement or to any of the subjects listed in paragraph 5, above, i.e. (a) whether the proposed settlement of the Action on the terms and conditions provided for in the Settlement Agreement is fair, reasonable, and adequate and should 8

Case 7:16-cv-01812-KMK Document 75 Filed 10/17/17 Page 9 of 11 be given final approval by the Court; (b) whether a judgment and order of dismissal with prejudice should be entered; (c) whether to approve the payment of attorneys' fees and expenses to Class Counsel; and (d) whether to approve the payment of an incentive award to the Class Representative.. 23. To be valid, objections must be filed with the Court and sent to the following: Class Counsel Scott A. Bursor of Bursor & Fisher, P.A., 888 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10019; and Defendant Trusted Media Brands, Inc.'s Counsel Natalie J. Spears ofdentons US, LLP, 233 S. Wacker Drive, Suite 5900, Chicago, IL 60606. In addition, any objections made by a Class member represented by counsel must be filed through the Court's CM/ECF system. Further Matters 24. All further proceedings in the Action are ordered stayed until Final Judgment or termination of the Settlement Agreement, whichever occurs earlier, except for those matters necessary to obtain and/or effectuate final approval of the Settlement Agreement. 25. Members of the Settlement Class shall be bound by all determinations and judgments in the Action concerning the Action and/or Settlement Agreement, whether favorable or unfavorable. 26. The Court retains jurisdiction to consider all further applications arising out of or connected with the proposed Settlement Agreement. The Court may approve the Settlement, with such modifications as may be agreed to by the Parties, if appropriate, without further notice to the Class. 27. Any Settlement Class Member who does not timely and validly submit a claim: (a) shall be forever barred from participating in any distributions of the Settlement Fund; (b) shall be bound by the provisions of the Settlement Agreement and all proceedings, 9

Case 7:16-cv-01812-KMK Document 75 Filed 10/17/17 Page 10 of 11 determinations, orders and judgments in the Action relating thereto, including, without limitation, the Judgment or Alternate Judgment, if applicable, and the Releases provided for therein, whether favorable or unfavorable to the Class; and (c) shall forever be barred and enjoined from directly or indirectly filing, commencing, instituting, prosecuting, maintaining, or intervening in any action, suit, cause of action, arbitration, claim, demand, or other proceeding in any jurisdiction, whether in the United States or elsewhere, on their own behalf or in a representative capacity, that is based upon or arises out of any or all of the Released Claims against any of the Defendant and the other Released Parties, as more fully described in the Settlement Agreement. 28. If the Settlement Agreement is not approved by the Court in complete accordance with its terms, each party will have the option of having the Action revert to its status as if the Settlement Agreement had not been negotiated, made, or filed with the Court. In such event, the parties will retain all rights as if the Settlement Agreement was never agreed upon. 29. In the event that the Settlement Agreement is terminated pursuant to the provisions of the Settlement Agreement or for any reason whatsoever the approval of it does not become Final then (i) the Settlement Agreement shall be null and void, including any provision related to the award of attorneys' fees, and shall have no further force and effect with respect to any party in this Action, and shall not be used in this Action or in any other proceeding for any purpose; (ii) all negotiations, proceedings, documents prepared, and statements made in connection therewith shall be without prejudice to any person or party hereto, shall not be deemed or construed to be an admission by any party of any act, matter, or proposition, and shall not be used in any manner or for any purpose in any subsequent proceeding in this Action or in any other action in any court or other proceeding, provided, however, that the termination of the 10

Case 7:16-cv-01812-KMK Document 75 Filed 10/17/17 Page 11 of 11 Settlement Agreement shall not shield from subsequent discovery any factual information provided in connection with the negotiation of this Settlement Agreement that would ordinarily be discoverable but for the attempted settlement; (iii) other than as expressly preserved by the Settlement Agreement in the event of its termination, the Settlement Agreement shall have no further force and effect with respect to any party and shall not be used in the Action or any other proceeding for any purpose; and (iv) any party may elect to move the Court pursuant to the provisions of this paragraph, and none of the non-moving parties (or their counsel) shall oppose any such motion..{'1 IT IS SO ORDERED, this f b Odd~' day of _J._,~~"~l, 2017. 7 Ente1ed! 11