As Introduced. Regular Session H. B. No

Similar documents
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO. MELISSA ARBINO, Case No

Tort Reform (2) The pleading specifically asserts that the medical care has and all medical records

In the Supreme Court of Florida

State Laws Chart I: Liability Reforms

[Cite as Oliver v. Cleveland Indians Baseball Co. Ltd. Partnership, 123 Ohio St.3d 278, Ohio-5030.]

(a) Except as provided in K.S.A Supp and , and amendments thereto, if a

Codebook. A. Effective dates: In the data set, the law is coded as if it changes from one month to

GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF NORTH CAROLINA SESSION 2011 H 1 HOUSE BILL 542. Short Title: Tort Reform for Citizens and Businesses. (Public)

IS DISCRIMINATION JUST ANOTHER TORT?: A DISCUSSION OF OHIO S ATTEMPT TO TORTIFY EMPLOYMENT DISCRIMINATION KATHARINE R. MARKIJOHN * I.

As Introduced. Regular Session H. B. No

NC General Statutes - Chapter 15B Article 1 1

(Reprinted with amendments adopted on May 19, 2015) SECOND REPRINT S.B Referred to Committee on Judiciary

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA MIAMI DIVISION CASE NO. COMPLAINT AND DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL

TITLE 29. Torts Ordinance. Chapter General Provisions

As Reported by the Senate Local Government, Public Safety and Veterans Affairs Committee

PRINCIPLES OF EUROPEAN TORT LAW

CHAPTER 20 ASSAULT AND BATTERY

As Introduced. Regular Session H. B. No

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 01/12/ :18 PM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 21 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 01/12/2018

Emerging Trend. Impetus for Trend 9/22/2017. Hold em or Fold em: Gambling with the Introduction of Medical Bills

MODEL MOTOR VEHICLE NEGLIGENCE CHARGE AND VERDICT SHEET. MOTOR VEHICLE VOLUME REPLACEMENT JUNE

CAUSE NO. COME NOW, Raymond Gilbert (REDACTED) and Daniela (REDACTED), Individually, and

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

New York Practice: A Defendant s Litigation Guide

NC General Statutes - Chapter 90 Article 1B 1

SENATE BILL No Introduced by Senators Lara and Mitchell. February 16, 2018

IN THE COMMON PLEAS COURT OF LUCAS COUNTY, OHIO. Case No.: ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF KANSAS. No. 114,890. and. NORTHERN CLEARING, INC. and OLD REPUBLIC INS. CO., Intervenors/Appellees.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS. v. Case No.:

H 5452 S T A T E O F R H O D E I S L A N D

TORT LAW. By Helen Jordan, Elaine Martinez, and Jim Ponce

STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS

Damages in Tort 6. Damages in Contract 18. Restitution 27. Rescission 32. Specific Performance 38. Account of Profits 40.

6.1 Jones Act - Unseaworthiness General Instruction (Comparative Negligence Defense) The Plaintiff seeks to recover under a federal statute known as

Tort Liability. July 11, Call in number: Pass Code: #

Transition to the Criminal Injuries Compensation Act of This chapter may be cited as the "Criminal Injuries Compensation Act.

Complaint - Walmart Substance on Floor in Frozen Food Dept.

The Victims of Crime Regulations, 1997

TITLE 6 SOVEREIGN IMMUNITY

STANDING COMMITTEES OF THE OHIO HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 132 ND GENERAL ASSEMBLY

JUDY GAYLE DESETTI OPINION BY v. Record No JUSTICE LEROY F. MILLETTE, JR. June 4, 2015 FRANCIS CHESTER, ET AL.

COURT OF APPEALS RICHLAND COUNTY, OHIO FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

Plaintiff, for its Complaint against the above-captioned Defendants, states and

TITLE 6 SOVEREIGN IMMUNITY

Juvenile Scripts SCRIPT FOR DETENTION HEARING...2 SCRIPT FOR AN ADJUDICATION HEARING IN WHICH THE RESPONDENT PLEADS TRUE...7

As Passed by the House. Regular Session Sub. H. B. No

As Passed by the House. Regular Session H. B. No

STATE OF MICHIGAN IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR THE COUNTY OF OAKLAND

Case 4:04-cr WRW Document 416 Filed 10/31/2007 Page 1 of 11 U S. DIS i iilc I C(;CII?.I EAST LtiN I11S I t<i(; I i\l<k!

Texas Courts Should Reduce a Plaintiff s Responsibility Before Applying the Noneconomic Damage Cap

HIEU PHUONG HOANG NO CA-0749 VERSUS COURT OF APPEAL THORTON SERVICES, INC., ET AL. FOURTH CIRCUIT STATE OF LOUISIANA * * * * * * *

AN ACT RELATING TO DRIVING UNDER THE INFLUENCE OF INTOXICATING LIQUOR OR DRUGS; INCREASING THE PENALTY FOR HOMICIDE BY

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA FOR SANTA CRUZ COUNTY

Second, you must not be influenced by sympathy, passion or prejudice in favor of any party or against any of the parties.

Pain and Suffering under Article 50 of the New York Statutes. The Burbank Group

10 AN ACT to amend and reenact of the Code of West Virginia, 1931, as amended, relating

Courthouse News Service

8.50 INVASION OF PRIVACY DAMAGES (01/2016) NOTE TO JUDGE

Assault and Battery Common Law

STATE OF KANSAS TRANSPORTATION COMPENDIUM OF LAW

Torts: Recent Developments

As Reported by the House Criminal Justice Committee. 132nd General Assembly Regular Session Sub. S. B. No

OHIO. House of Representatives JOURNAL

Will Tort Reform Combat The Medical Malpractice Insurance Availability And Affordability Problems That Virginia'S Physicians Are Facing?

IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF WASHINGTON COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA CRIMINAL DIVISION COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA : : VS. : NO. : :

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR THE STATE OF OREGON IN THE COUNTY OF MULTNOMAH

PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO SENATE BILL 726

EXPLAINING THE COURTS AN INFORMATION BOOKLET

Case3:05-cv WHA Document1 Filed02/14/05 Page1 of 5

106TH CONGRESS 2D SESSION H. R. 2498

Pursuant to Rule 50(b), Ala. R. Civ. Proc., Defendant, Mobile Infirmary Association,

Provisions of the Health Payment Reform Act Affecting Medical Malpractice Litigation

assault does not qualify as a most serious offense under the persistent offender statute and because

For Preview Only - Please Do Not Copy

Constitutional Amendment A. Following is the ballot language of Constitutional Amendment A as it will appear on the 2004 General Election ballot:

1 HB By Representative Williams (JD) 4 RFD: Judiciary. 5 First Read: 11-MAR-15. Page 0

7.32 COMPARATIVE NEGLIGENCE: INTERROGATORIES (Approved before 1985) NOTE TO JUDGE

Case: 4:17-cv AGF Doc. #: 1 Filed: 01/23/17 Page: 1 of 6 PageID #: 1

JOURNALS OF THE SENATE AND HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES OHIO SENATE JOURNAL

As Introduced. 132nd General Assembly Regular Session S. B. No Senators Skindell, Jordan Cosponsors: Senators Thomas, Tavares

FILED: BRONX COUNTY CLERK 01/26/ :43 AM INDEX NO /2018E NYSCEF DOC. NO. 2 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 01/26/2018

Torts Tutorial Chapter 6 Joint Tortfeasors

MINNESOTA TRUCK CRASH LAW OVERVIEW

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF OREGON. STATE OF OREGON, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. DANIEL A. ONISHCHENKO, Defendant-Appellant.

SENATE BILL By Norris BE IT ENACTED BY THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF THE STATE OF TENNESSEE:

For An Act To Be Entitled

Canadian Systems of Law Contract and Tort Law for Professionals There are two systems of law that operate in Canada: Common Law and Civil Law.

FALL 2001 December 15, 2001 FALL SEMESTER SAMPLE ANSWER

.JAh : Plaintiff Salah Williams, residir,g at 129 Chancellor Avenue in the City of Newark,

If anyone thinks that tort reform is actually good for families, then I invite you to visit

CHAPTER 4 JURY DELIBERATIONS; VERDICT FORMS

Legal and Ethical Considerations (Chapter 3- Mosby s Dental Hygiene)

S16G0662. LYMAN et al. v. CELLCHEM INTERNATIONAL, INC. After Dale Lyman and his wife, Helen, left Cellchem International, Inc.

SPRING 2004 April 27, 2004 FINAL EXAM DO NOT GO BEYOND THIS PAGE UNTIL THE EXAM ACTUALLY BEGINS.

Civil Justice for Victims of Crime in Oregon

Board of Claims -- Limitation on damage awards -- Hearing officers -- Asbestos related claims. (1) A Board of Claims, composed of the members

The Civil Rights Act of 1991

CV CMCO 01/06/ :18:35 PM OLDFIELD, JOY M Page 1 of 8 IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS SUMMIT COUNTY, OHIO CASE NO.:

9:12-cv PMD-BHH Date Filed 09/17/12 Entry Number 1 Page 1 of 8

Insurance - Is the Liability Carrier Liable for Punitive Damages Awarded by the Jury?

Transcription:

132nd General Assembly Regular Session H. B. No. 20 2017-2018 Representatives Gonzales, Boggs Cosponsors: Representatives Antonio, Cera, Dever, Fedor, Johnson, G., Kent, Lepore-Hagan, Miller, Sheehy A B I L L To amend section 2315.18 of the Revised Code to remove the cap on the amount of compensatory damages that represents damages for noneconomic loss that is recoverable in a tort action when the tort action is brought by a victim of rape, felonious assault, aggravated assault, assault, or negligent assault. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 BE IT ENACTED BY THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF THE STATE OF OHIO: Section 1. That section 2315.18 of the Revised Code be amended to read as follows: Sec. 2315.18. (A) As used in this section and in section 2315.19 of the Revised Code: (1) "Asbestos claim" has the same meaning as in section 2307.91 of the Revised Code. (2) "Economic loss" means any of the following types of pecuniary harm: (a) All wages, salaries, or other compensation lost as a 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16

H. B. No. 20 Page 2 result of an injury or loss to person or property that is a subject of a tort action; (b) All expenditures for medical care or treatment, rehabilitation services, or other care, treatment, services, products, or accommodations as a result of an injury or loss to person or property that is a subject of a tort action; (c) Any other expenditures incurred as a result of an injury or loss to person or property that is a subject of a tort action, other than attorney's fees incurred in connection with that action. (3) "Medical claim," "dental claim," "optometric claim," and "chiropractic claim" have the same meanings as in section 2305.113 of the Revised Code. (4) "Noneconomic loss" means nonpecuniary harm that results from an injury or loss to person or property that is a subject of a tort action, including, but not limited to, pain and suffering, loss of society, consortium, companionship, care, assistance, attention, protection, advice, guidance, counsel, instruction, training, or education, disfigurement, mental anguish, and any other intangible loss. (5) "Occurrence" means all claims resulting from or arising out of any one person's bodily injury. (6) "Product liability claim" has the same meaning as in section 2307.71 of the Revised Code. (7) "Tort action" means a civil action for damages for injury or loss to person or property. "Tort action" includes a civil action upon a product liability claim or an asbestos claim. "Tort action" does not include a civil action upon a medical claim, dental claim, optometric claim, or chiropractic 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45

H. B. No. 20 Page 3 claim or a civil action for damages for a breach of contract or another agreement between persons. (8) "Trier of fact" means the jury or, in a nonjury action, the court. (B) In a tort action to recover damages for injury or loss to person or property, all of the following apply: (1) There shall not be any limitation on the amount of compensatory damages that represents the economic loss of the person who is awarded the damages in the tort action. (2) Except as otherwise provided in division (B)(3) or (4) of this section, the amount of compensatory damages that represents damages for noneconomic loss that is recoverable in a tort action under this section to recover damages for injury or loss to person or property shall not exceed the greater of two hundred fifty thousand dollars or an amount that is equal to three times the economic loss, as determined by the trier of fact, of the plaintiff in that tort action to a maximum of three hundred fifty thousand dollars for each plaintiff in that tort action or a maximum of five hundred thousand dollars for each occurrence that is the basis of that tort action. (3) There shall not be any limitation on the amount of compensatory damages that represents damages for noneconomic loss that is recoverable in a tort action to recover damages for injury or loss to person or property if the noneconomic losses of the plaintiff are for either of the following: (a) Permanent and substantial physical deformity, loss of use of a limb, or loss of a bodily organ system; (b) Permanent physical functional injury that permanently prevents the injured person from being able to independently 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74

H. B. No. 20 Page 4 care for self and perform life-sustaining activities. (4) There shall not be any limitation on the amount of compensatory damages that represents damages for noneconomic loss that is recoverable in a tort action brought by the victim of the offense of rape, felonious assault, aggravated assault, assault, or negligent assault asserting any claim resulting from the rape, felonious assault, aggravated assault, assault, or negligent assault. (C) In determining an award of compensatory damages for noneconomic loss in a tort action, the trier of fact shall not consider any of the following: (1) Evidence of a defendant's alleged wrongdoing, misconduct, or guilt; (2) Evidence of the defendant's wealth or financial resources; (3) All other evidence that is offered for the purpose of punishing the defendant, rather than offered for a compensatory purpose. (D) If a trial is conducted in a tort action to recover damages for injury or loss to person or property and a plaintiff prevails in that action, the court in a nonjury trial shall make findings of fact, and the jury in a jury trial shall return a general verdict accompanied by answers to interrogatories, that shall specify all of the following: (1) The total compensatory damages recoverable by the plaintiff; (2) The portion of the total compensatory damages that represents damages for economic loss; 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102

H. B. No. 20 Page 5 (3) The portion of the total compensatory damages that represents damages for noneconomic loss. (E)(1) After the trier of fact in a tort action to recover damages for injury or loss to person or property complies with division (D) of this section, the court shall enter a judgment in favor of the plaintiff for compensatory damages for economic loss in the amount determined pursuant to division (D)(2) of this section, and, subject to division (F)(1) of this section, the court shall enter a judgment in favor of the plaintiff for compensatory damages for noneconomic loss. Except as provided in division (B)(3) or (4) of this section, in no event shall a judgment for compensatory damages for noneconomic loss exceed the maximum recoverable amount that represents damages for noneconomic loss as provided in division (B)(2) of this section. Division (B) of this section shall be applied in a jury trial only after the jury has made its factual findings and determination as to the damages. (2) Prior to the trial in the tort action described in division (D) of this section, any party may seek summary judgment with respect to the nature of the alleged injury or loss to person or property, seeking a determination of the damages as described in division (B)(2) of this section. (F)(1) A court of common pleas has no jurisdiction to enter judgment on an award of compensatory damages for noneconomic loss in excess of the limits set forth in this section. (2) If the trier of fact is a jury, the court shall not instruct the jury with respect to the limit on compensatory damages for noneconomic loss described in division (B)(2) of this section, and neither counsel for any party nor a witness 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132

H. B. No. 20 Page 6 shall inform the jury or potential jurors of that limit. (G) With respect to a tort action to which division (B)(2) of this section applies, any excess amount of compensatory damages for noneconomic loss that is greater than the applicable amount specified in division (B)(2) of this section shall not be reallocated to any other tortfeasor beyond the amount of compensatory damages that the tortfeasor would otherwise be responsible for under the laws of this state. (H) This section does not apply to any of the following: (1) Tort actions that are brought against the state in the court of claims, including, but not limited to, those actions in which a state university or college is a defendant and to which division (B)(3) of section 3345.40 of the Revised Code applies; (2) Tort actions that are brought against political subdivisions of this state and that are commenced under or are subject to Chapter 2744. of the Revised Code. Division (C) of section 2744.05 of the Revised Code applies to recoverable damages in those actions. (3) Wrongful death actions brought pursuant to Chapter 2125. of the Revised Code. (I) If the provisions regarding the limits on compensatory damages for noneconomic loss set forth in division (B)(2) of this section have been determined to be unconstitutional, then division (C) of this section and section 2315.19 of the Revised Code shall govern the determination of an award of compensatory damages for noneconomic loss in a tort action. Section 2. That existing section 2315.18 of the Revised Code is hereby repealed. 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160