Legislative Update Issue # 6 July HR 4969 The Amateur Radio Parity Act of 2014

Similar documents
Legislative Update Issue # 8 March The Amateur Radio Parity Act of 2015 Introduced into the US House of Representatives

ASSEMBLY, No STATE OF NEW JERSEY. 211th LEGISLATURE INTRODUCED JANUARY 10, 2005

(NOTE: Please feel free to forward this Division Update to your club reflector or use content for your club newsletter.)

Androscoggin EMA Letter RE: RFI regulation Page 1 of 7

COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS RICHARD CHEDESTER VS. TOWN OF WHATELY & others 1 MEMORANDUM OF DECISION AND ORDER INTRODUCTION

ZONING OVERLAY DISTRICTS

Irving, Texas October 24, 2009

Federal Communications Commission

The Listening Post. President s Message

Central Illinois Radio Club March 2015 Newsletter

Planning Commission Report

WHEREAS, under California Public Utilities Code Section 7901, the City may not ban such small cell facilities; and

LAND USE AND ENVIRONMENTAL WORKSHOP ACREL SPRING, 1997 MEETING SCOTTSDALE, ARIZONA

Wireless Facility Siting: Model Chapter Implementing Section 6409(a)

PUBLIC HEARING NOTIFICATION REQUIREMENTS

Telecommunications Law

Section 9.12: Cell Tower Regulations

COMMUNICATING WITH ELECTED OFFICIALS

Housing Cooperative Voices: LOBBYING FOR YOUR COOPERATIVE. Judy Sullivan NAHC Government Relations Representative

MEMORANDUM. TA : Amendments to Chapter 27, Zoning

City of Paso Robles Planning Commission Agenda Report

Big Island Amateur Radio Club August 2015 Newsletter

STATE POLITICAL COORDINATOR MANUAL MASSACHUSETTS ASSOCIATION OF REALTORS

CHAPTER Committee Substitute for Committee Substitute for House Bill No. 687

MINUTES OF ARRL EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE Number 485 Memphis, Tennessee March 15, 2008

TOWN OF BERNARDSTON COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS Franklin, SS.

WHEREAS, various federal and state laws partially restrict the City of El Paso de Robles' ability to regulate telecommunications facilities; and

How to Host a Member of Congress at Your ESOP Company

TO REPEAL AND RECREATE CHAPTER 64 OF THE WALWORTH COUNTY CODE OF ORDINANCES:

BE IT ORDAINED BY THE JURISDICTION OF,

II. BACKGROUND. Page 618

Wireless Facility Siting: Model Chapter Implementing Section 6409(a) and. Wireless Facility Siting: Section 6409(a) Checklist

TELECOMMUNICATIONS LAW AND PRACTICE IN GEORGIA

NAPO VICTORY: PRESIDENT SIGNS BILL TO CREATE A NATIONWIDE INTEROPERABLE BROADBAND NETWORK FOR PUBLIC SAFETY

SAN MARCOS CITY COUNCIL ITEM #12 TELECOMMUNICATIONS ORDINANCE

CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICT LEADER (CDL) NARFE GUIDANCE

ARTICLE 1: Purpose and Administration

MINUTES OF ARRL EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE Number 493 St. Louis, Missouri October 23, 2010

Telecommunications Law

CITY OF SUMMERSET ORDINANCE 14 ORDINANCE FOR SITING OF WIRELESS TELECOMMUNICATION FACILITIES

Defendants. APPEARANCES: OF COUNSEL:

PUBLIC NOTICE Federal Communications Commission th St., S.W. Washington, D.C

Model Zoning Ordinance

Getting Members of Congress to Your Event

Differing Treatment of Collocations and New Builds in Federal Law and Application to the Rights of Way

WASHINGTON BUREAU NATIONAL ASSOCIATION FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF COLORED PEOPLE

Presenter: Jonathan Kramer

Implementing the FCC Order on Wireless Facilities Collocations - Ordinances and Application Forms

A Guide to Setting Up Congressional Site Visits August 2011

STATEMENT FOR THE RECORD BARRY MELANCON, PRESIDENT AND CEO AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS PUBLIC HEARING

Wireless Communication Facilities

Ordinance No Exhibit A Antennas/Personal Wireless Telecommunication Facilities.

ORDINANCE NO BE IT FURTHER ENACTED AND ORDAINED by the Mayor and City Council of Laurel, Maryland that

Draft 11/1/13 In this document Parma Radio Club is referred to as PRC.

COMMUNICATION TOWERS

Scheduling a meeting.

>>> Government Affairs Conference. American Wire Producers Association. September 16-18, Wire Is Everywhere

S U B D I V I S I O N A N D D E V E L O P M E N T A P P E A L B O A R D A G E N D A

CITY OF ST. AUGUSTA ORDINANCE NO

Submit the deed or legal instrument identifying the applicant s interest in the property.

Frankford Radio Club, Philadelphia, PA Letter to ARRL

ARTICLE 7 WIRELESS TELECOMMUNICATIONS TOWERS AND FACILITIES

Action Required in the Event of Abandonment of Cellular Tower Staff Review Proposals by the Applicant

ORDINANCE NO. BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MUSTANG, OKLAHOMA;

}hex.. '?\~m( \q \4- ~Z1- ~?q0 CLERK OF COURTS 210 S,FULTON STREET ROOM 102 WAUSEON, OH OF FULTON COUNTY CLERK DATE, ~0\) \ \~

SCAN NATOA Telecommunications 101 January 15, 2015 LOCAL REGULATION OF WIRELESS TELECOMMUNICATION FACILITIES

ARTICLE 23 TELECOMMUNICATIONS TOWERS

Citizenship in the Nation Merit Badge Prerequisite Workbook

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSOURI. Defendant-Appellant. Cause No. SC082519

NAMI Minnesota Guide to Legislative Action

Effective Communication with Legislators

TITLE 9 BUSINESS REGULATIONS AND LICENSING BUSINESS REGULATIONS AND LICENSING 1

The FCC s Fairness Doctrine

Cellular Tower Zoning, Siting, Leasing and Franchising: Federal Developments and Municipal Interests

SECTION 1 - TITLE SECTION 2 - PREAMBLE SECTION 3 - DEFINITIONS

Communicating with Elected Officials

MINUTES OF ARRL EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE Number 504 Westlake, Texas March 12, 2016

6 Argued: March 8, 2010 Decided: June 30, 2010

SEVENTEENTH ANNUAL REPORT OF THE OPEN MEETINGS COMPLIANCE BOARD BOARD MEMBERS

Chapter 35. The Telecommunications Act of 1996 and Wireless Telecommunications

Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C ) ) ) ) ) ) ) NOTICE OF APPARENT LIABILITY FOR FORFEITURE. Released: June 7, 2005

The Brave New World of Wireless Regulations for Planners

April 29, Opinion No Jack L. Lively Coffeyville City Attorney Coffeyville, Kansas Dear Mr. Lively:

A Guide to Hosting Successful Congressional Lumber Yard Tours

2018 Democratic Primary Questionnaire

Prospects for Modernization of the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA) During the 114 th Congress

REG I STER TODAY AT: meetings.alta.org/federal ALTA Federal Conference. May 18-20, 2015 Mandarin Oriental Hotel Washington, D.C.

Hometown Lobbying Handbook

Dealer Visit Handbook A GUIDE FOR DEALERS TO CONDUCT SUCCESSFUL DEALER VISITS WITH THEIR MEMBERS OF CONGRESS

THE ABCs of CITIZEN ADVOCACY

ARTICLE XX ADMINISTRATION AND ENFORCEMENT

Legislative. Florida Council of Chapters Winter Leadership Forum. Col Fran Martin, USAF (ret) Chair. Lt Col Bob Bienvenue, USAF (ret)

A Guide to Communicating with Members of Congress. Make sure you effectively communicate with your Member of Congress.

Telecommunications Law Update

WASHINGTON BUREAU NATIONAL ASSOCIATION FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF COLORED PEOPLE

JASON C Legislative Update. Bristol Harwinton Plainville Plymouth

BROOKWOOD ESTATES HOA

Going Congressional. Congressional contacts can be obtained at: Most Congressmen have what is called their Constituent Services Manger.

CONTACTING CONGRESS TABLE OF CONTENTS

PERSON COUNTY ROXBORO, NORTH CAROLINA APPLICATION FOR SPECIAL USE PERMIT WIRELESS TELECOMMUNICATIONS FACILITIES

Transcription:

July 2014 ARRL - 225 Main Street Newington, CT 06111 Edited by Dan Henderson, N1ND, ARRL Regulatory Information Manager HR 4969 The Amateur Radio Parity Act of 2014 A Commonsense Solution to Provide Equality in Land Use Regulation On Wednesday June 25 th, Representative Adam Kinzinger (R-IL -16th), with Representative Joe Courtney (D- CT-02) as cosponsor, introduced in the 113 th US Congress The Amateur Radio Parity Act of 2014. If passed by Congress and signed into law, Representative Kinzinger s bill would require the FCC, within 120 days of the Bill s enactment, to amend the Part 97 Amateur Service rules to apply its Amateur Radio limited preemption policy to all types of land use regulations including homeowners association regulations and deed restrictions, often referred to as covenants, conditions, and restrictions (CC&Rs). Presently, the policy only applies to state and local zoning laws and ordinances. HR 4969 is the ARRL s plan to secure reasonable accommodation for the thousands of licensed Amateur Radio operators who are denied effective antennas at their residences due to private land use regulations that are either part of their property deeds of purchase or are imposed by their local homeowner s associations. CC&Rs typically preclude licensed Amateurs residing in deed-restricted communities from conducting public service or emergency preparedness communications. The number of communities that have such restrictions is increasing at exponential rates. In a 2012 report to Congress, mandated by the Middle Class Tax Relief and Job Creation Act of 2012, the FCC concluded that should Congress see fit to enact a statutory directive mandating the expansion of its limited preemption policy [PRB-1] to include more than state and local regulations, it would expeditiously act to fulfill its obligation. ARRL Regulatory Information Manager Dan Henderson, N1ND, says, The purpose of HR 4969 is to provide the FCC with that directive. Bipartisan support for HR 4969 is the key to its success. In this newsletter, the ARRL will be providing information on how to engage your Congressperson on this issue. You should let your Representative know not only that this issue is important to you their constituent but why it is important. Be authentic and personal when speaking with your Congressperson and his or her staff. The text of HR 4969 can be viewed in-line at http://www.arrl.org/files/media/news/hr4969.pdf For more information on HR 4969 please visit: http://www.arrl.org/hr-4969 1

July 2014 page 2 A Message from ARRL President Kay Craigie With the introduction of HR 4969, The Amateur Radio Parity Act of 2014, we have the chance to make full participation in Amateur Radio possible for thousands of present and future Amateurs. This legislation is not just about you and me, the ARRL members of 2014. It is about everyone who will be an Amateur in the United States in the ARRL s second century, including Americans who haven t even been born yet, who could invent radio technology we cannot even imagine today. Chances are, those Americans of the future will grow up in communities having private land use restrictions. That is the way the country is going, and it is very bad for Amateur Radio. How can Amateur Radio thrive, if more and more Americans cannot have reasonable antennas at home? You and I have to stand for the Amateurs of the 2 nd century. The ARRL members of the first century certainly spoke out for us, protecting spectrum and opposing unreasonable zoning regulations. Now it is our turn. Even if private land use restrictions do not apply to us personally, we still need to speak out for our fellow hams that are affected. It is just what we hams do. We are able to think and act beyond our own personal interests. Contact your Congressman now to become a co-sponsor, and light a fire under your friends to contact their Congressmen, too. We have to stand for each other. We have to stand for the Amateurs of the future. We have to do this now. 73, Kay Craigie N3KN How to Contact Your Representative in the US House The ARRL is requesting you contact your member in the US House of Representatives. You can find your Congressperson's name and contact information on the ARRLWeb at: http://www.arrl.org/contacting-your-congressional-representatives Remember that regular US mail is extremely slow to reach Capitol Hill because of security screening that takes weeks. To expedite getting your signed letter to your Representative, you can send it to: ARRL Attn: HR 4969 225 Main St Newington, CT 06111 2

July 2014 page 3 Sample Letter to your Congressperson Dear Representative Smith: As a constituent and a licensed Amateur Radio operator in your district, I am writing asking that you support HR 4969 The Amateur Radio Parity Act of 2014 and request that you become a co-sponsor for this legislation. For over 30 years, the FCC and Congress have repeatedly acknowledged the strong Federal interest in effective Amateur Radio communications. The FCC found that municipalities often unreasonably restricted Amateur Radio antennas in residential areas. In its declaratory ruling now codified at 47 C.F.R. 97.15(b) the FCC determined that: Except as otherwise provided herein, a station antenna structure may be erected at heights and dimensions sufficient to accommodate amateur service communications. (State and local regulation of a station antenna structure must not preclude amateur service communications. Rather, it must reasonably accommodate such communications and must constitute the minimum practicable regulation to accomplish the state or local authority's legitimate purpose. HR 4969 will extend limited reasonable accommodation provisions to include all types of land use regulations, including preclusive homeowner s association regulations and restrictive covenants. The FCC has jurisdiction to provide these protections when there is a conflict with Federal policy. This was established when, at Congress instructions, it enacted regulations that preempted municipal and private land use regulation over satellite dish antennas and television broadcast receive antennas in residences. HR 4969 will provide a basis for radio Amateurs to negotiate reasonable accommodation for at least minimal outdoor Amateur Radio antennas with their homeowners association. This legislation is critically important to me and to the hundreds of other federally licensed Amateur Radio operators residing in your district. Please sign-on as a co-sponsor of HR 4969. Sincerely, Joe Amateur, W1AW 225 Main St Your Town, CT Remember to sign your Congressional letter before sending it. Unsigned letters are not beneficial. 3

July 2014 page 4 What is the Core Issue Behind HR 4969? The largest threat to Amateur Radio communications is land use restrictions that prohibit the installation of outdoor antenna systems. An outdoor antenna is critical to the efficiency of an Amateur Radio station. Private land use regulations are escalating quickly and exponentially. Even an unobtrusive, largely invisible length of wire in a tree or under the eaves of a roof is routinely prohibited in most deed restricted or HOA controlled residential areas. Since the early 1970s, growth of properties in the US that are subject to private land-use regulation in the United States is staggering: Year Communities Housing Units Residents 1970 10,000 701,000 2.1 million 1980 36,000 3.6 million 9.6 million 1990 130,000 11.6 million 29.6 million 2000 222,500 17.8 million 45.2 million 2002 240,000 19.2 million 48.0 million 2004 260,000 20.8 million 51.8 million 2006 286,000 23.1 million 57.0 million 2008 300,800 24.1 million 59.5 million 2010 309,600 24.8 million 62.0 million 2011 314,200 25.1 million 62.3 million (Source: The Community Associations Institute (CAI)) The ability of a licensed Amateur Radio operator to erect even modest wire or stealth antennas under the eaves of their homes is becoming more and more problematic. The key term is reasonable accommodation. What the Amateur community continues to seek is the ability to erect reasonable antenna systems that allow them to pursue their interests. More and more communities and housing units implement an absolute prohibition on any kind of antenna. HR 4969 would require HOAs and other community associations to work with the Amateurs to find a reasonable solution to the problem instead of simply imposing an absolute prohibition, denying any request that the Amateur licensee makes. The Amateur community has its work cut out for it as it promotes HR 4969. The opposition is already rallying its supporters to try to defeat this legislation. Amateur Radio operators need to band together as well. Amateurs across the country need to rally in a grassroots effort to talk to their members of Congress. Elsewhere in this newsletter, you will find a series of talking points to help you craft your own message if meeting with a Congressperson or Congressperson s staff. If you have questions about how to assist in the Grassroots effort, please do not hesitate to contact the ARRL Regulatory Information Manager, Dan Henderson, N1ND, who also is the point of contact for the ARRL Legislative Action program. He can be reached at n1nd@arrl.org or by phone at 860-594-0236. You should also be in contact with your ARRL Division Director to see how you can assist his efforts in promoting the Amateur Radio Parity Act of 2014. 4

July 2014 page 5 Key Talking Points on HR 4969 Keep these key points in mind if writing a letter to or speaking with your Member of Congress one of the legislative assistants. They will help focus the discussion on HR 4969 and why it is important to you: The American Radio Relay League, Incorporated (ARRL) is the representative of Amateur Radio in the United States. There are more than 720,000 Amateur Radio operators licensed by the FCC. ARRL s membership of over 160,000 includes the most active and dedicated Amateur Radio operators. Radio Amateurs (hams) provide, on a volunteer basis, public service, emergency, and disaster relief communications using radio stations located in their residences. Their services cost taxpayers nothing, and are provided are at no cost to any served agency or to any government entity. FEMA has stated that when Amateur Radio operators are needed in an emergency or disaster, they are really needed. Served agencies include the American Red Cross, the Salvation Army, the Federal Emergency Management Agency, and the Department of Defense. Disaster relief planning exercises and emergency communications certification courses guarantee trained operators throughout the United States. The largest threat to Amateur Radio emergency and public service communications (which is escalating quickly and exponentially) is land use restrictions that prohibit the installation of outdoor antenna systems. An outdoor antenna is critical to the efficiency of an Amateur Radio station. Even unobtrusive, largely invisible lengths of wire in a tree or under the eve of a roof are routinely prohibited in residential areas by private land use regulations. In 1985, the FCC found that there was a strong Federal interest in supporting effective Amateur Radio communications, and that zoning ordinances often unreasonably restricted Amateur Radio antenna in residential areas. The FCC created a three-part test for municipal regulations affecting Amateur Radio antennas. State or local land use regulations: (A) cannot preclude Amateur Radio communications; (B) must make reasonable accommodation for Amateur Radio communications; and (C) must constitute the minimum practicable restriction in order to accomplish a legitimate municipal purpose. The FCC did not extend this policy to private land use regulations at the time, and has declined to do so saying that deed restrictions, covenants and homeowner s association regulations were private agreements that did not normally concern the FCC. However, the Telecommunications Act of 1996 ordered the FCC to enact regulations that preempted municipal and private land use regulation over small satellite dish antennas and television broadcast antennas in residences. The FCC acknowledged that it does have jurisdiction to preempt private land use regulations that conflict with Federal policy. Upon ARRL s repeated requests to FCC to revisit its decision and to apply policy equally to all types of land use regulations which unreasonably restrict or preclude volunteer, public service communications, FCC said that it would do so upon receiving some guidance from Congress in this area. Pursuant to the Middle Class Tax Relief and Job Creation Act of 2012, the FCC conducted a study on the uses and capabilities of Amateur Radio Service communications in emergencies and disaster relief and submitted to the House and Senate a Report on the findings of such study. The docket proceeding created an impressive record demonstrating the severe and pervasive impact of private land use regulations on Amateur Radio emergency communications. The record in the docket proceeding justifies the even application of FCC s balanced, limited preemption policy to all types of land use regulation of Amateur Radio antennas. The FCC said, in effect, that should Congress instruct FCC to do so, it would expeditiously extend the policy. Therefore, we seek cosponsors for H.R. 4969, a Bill that would provide for regulatory parity and uniformity in land use regulations as they pertain to Amateur Radio. 5

July 2014 page 6 A Message from the Our Washington Consultant As the 100th celebration of ARRL approaches, and we reflect on the association's greatest accomplishments and feats, it is also important to note that threats to our vocation remain. Without question, the greatest risk Amateur Radio emergency and public service communications continues to face is the proliferation of land use restrictions that prohibit the installation of outdoor antenna systems. As any ham knows, an outdoor antenna is critical to the efficiency of an Amateur Radio station. However, increasingly, private land use regulations are preventing the installation of even an unobtrusive, largely invisible length of wire in a tree or under the eve of a roof. Upon ARRL s repeated requests, the FCC said that it requires guidance from Congress in this area to defray the severe and pervasive impact of private land use regulations on Amateur Radio emergency communications. The FCC said, in effect, that should Congress instruct FCC to do so, it would expeditiously extend the policy. Therefore, ARRL is working with Congress to nudge the FCC into action. Last week, bipartisan legislation was introduced in the U.S. House of Representatives that would require the FCC to apply the balanced reasonable accommodation policy the agency currently uses for municipal land use regulation to private land use regulation for amateur radio antennas. H.R. 4969, the Amateur Radio Communications Regulatory Parity Act, was introduced by Reps. Adam Kinzinger (R-IL) and Joe Courtney (D-CT) to protect the strong Federal interest in amateur radio communications regardless of the type of land use regulation that applies to those communications, while preserving local land use authority. Most importantly, it will ensure that every ham in the US, regardless of the community they live in, will have the opportunity to practice their vocation from their own homes without breaking any rules or fear of reprisal. The Keelan Group Why Do We Request Letters Be Mailed to ARRL For Delivery? We are frequently asked why the ARRL asks that letters be mailed to ARRL for delivery instead of simply mailing them directly to the Congressional offices. The answer is two-fold. First, since the 9/11 attacks and subsequent security threats, all incoming mail to Congressional offices is first diverted to a holding area outside of Washington DC. Once at that facility it undergoes a series of scans to test for a variety of problems. Only after it passes the security tests is it forwarded on to Capitol Hill for delivery. The delay in delivery is generally in the 5-7 week range. By mailing the letters to the ARRL, we are able to have the letters handdelivered to the various congressional offices in a timely manner. The second reason is just as important. When our Washington team delivers letters to a Congressional office, it provides them an opportunity for at least a brief face-to-face meeting with some of the key staff members in each Congressional office they visit. Each in-person meeting is another opportunity for the ARRL s story to be told and is another chance to answer questions that may arise. Most Congressional offices do provide some type of on-line email or web-based form for submitting comments. These too have their place in helping ensure our message is conveyed personally. Just remember when contacting your Congressperson to be Courteous, Authentic, and Personal! 6