Public Opinion on the Death Penalty: Findings from a Singapore survey

Similar documents
Public Opinion On The Death Penalty In Singapore: Survey Findings

Families Against Mandatory Minimums 1612 K Street, N.W., Suite 700 Washington, D.C

2. The study offers unique contributions to understanding social capital in Singapore.

DEATH PENALTY M. Ravi

HOMICIDE POLICIES AND PROCEDURES STATE ATTORNEY S OFFICE, FOURTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, FLORIDA

EUI Working Group on International Criminal Law Meeting of on Issues of Sentencing in International Criminal Law

18 USC NB: This unofficial compilation of the U.S. Code is current as of Jan. 4, 2012 (see

Jurisdiction Profile: Alabama

Release #2486 Release Date: Friday, September 12, 2014

Juvenile Scripts SCRIPT FOR DETENTION HEARING...2 SCRIPT FOR AN ADJUDICATION HEARING IN WHICH THE RESPONDENT PLEADS TRUE...7

Chapter 13 Topics in the Economics of Crime and Punishment

Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Amendment Bill 2007

Survey on the Death Penalty

Francis Burt Law Education Programme

Could I please speak with the (MALE/FEMALE) in your household, 18 years or older, who celebrated a birthday most recently?

DETENTION PERIODS. This document is provided as general guidelines only.

Superior Court of Washington For Pierce County

THE FIELD POLL. UCB Contact

Sentencing and the Correctional System. Chapter 11

COR160 Essential Academic Writing Skills Individual Assignment 02 January 2014 Presentation

Summer 2008 August 1, 2008 SAMPLE ANSWER TO FINAL EXAM MULTIPLE CHOICE

1 PEW RESEARCH CENTER

Title 204. Judicial System General Provisions Part VIII Criminal Sentencing Chapter 303. Sentencing Guidelines

EU - Irish Presidency Poll. January 2013

NOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION. No. 113,051 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF KANSAS. STATE OF KANSAS, Appellee, TRAVIS NALL, Appellant.

CHAPTER Senate Bill No. 1768

Criminal Law Guidebook - Chapter 12: Sentencing and Punishment

POLL DATA HIGHLIGHTS SIGNIFICANT DIFFERENCES BETWEEN REGISTERED DEMOCRATS AND REPUBLICANS.

EXPLAINING THE GE2015 OUTCOMES:

Evaluating the Mandatory Death Penalty under Section 398 of the Dangerous Drug Act 1952

Aggravating factors APPENDIX 2. Summary

A CITIZEN S GUIDE TO STRUCTURED SENTENCING

(3) less than twenty-five years but ten or more years, as a Class C felony; (4) less than ten years but five or more years, as a Class D felony;

) NOTICE OF INTENT TO SEEK THE DEATH PENALTY

ll1. THE SENTENCING COMMISSION

CHAPTER Senate Bill No. 808

IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF ALLEN COUNTY, OHIO

PRRI/The Atlantic 2016 Post- election White Working Class Survey Total = 1,162 (540 Landline, 622 Cell phone) November 9 20, 2016

SINGAPORE GENERAL ELECTION 2011 PUBLIC OPINION POLL APRIL 2011

Penal Code (Amendment) Bill

Florida RV Survey. 800 Registered Voters Statewide + Oversample of 600 Registered Republican Voters October 23-29, FL RV + GOP OS October 2017

CRIMINAL OFFENCES. Chapter 9

Case 4:04-cr WRW Document 416 Filed 10/31/2007 Page 1 of 11 U S. DIS i iilc I C(;CII?.I EAST LtiN I11S I t<i(; I i\l<k!

" findings in regard to the following offenses against Tanji Jackson:

CAMBIARE NASC 2018 AUGUST 15, 2018

Virginia s Nonviolent Offender Risk Assessment

FEDERAL PUBLIC DEFENDER Western District of Washington

FIRST DISTRICT APPELLATE PROJECT

R v DOBSON & NORRIS. Central Criminal Court. 4 January Sentencing Remarks of Mr Justice Treacy

A CITIZEN S GUIDE TO STRUCTURED SENTENCING

ISSUES. Saskatoon Criminal Defence Lawyers Association December 1, Fall Seminar, 1998: Bail Hearings and Sentencing. Prepared by: Andrew Mason

Community perceptions of migrants and immigration. D e c e m b e r

Justice Committee. Criminal Justice (Scotland) Bill. Written submission from Victim Support Scotland

Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Amendment (Standard Minimum Sentencing) Act 2002 No 90

The Field Poll, (415) The California Endowment, (213)

INFORMATION REQUIRED FOR ONLINE APPLICATION FOR A STUDENT PASS (for eforms 16)

GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF NORTH CAROLINA SESSION 2017

CHAPTER Committee Substitute for Committee Substitute for House Bill No. 113

Do Capital Jurors Understand Mitigation? Why mitigation? 4/13/2011. Aggravation vs. Mitigation

Annual National Tracking Survey Analysis

RECOMMENDATION TO THE LEGISLATURE OF ALASKA FROM THE ALASKA CRIMINAL JUSTICE COMMISSION

Chapter 6 Sentencing and Corrections

DRC Parole Population. Correctional Institution Inspection Committee

OBJECTS AND REASONS

Public Opinion & Political Development in Hong Kong. Survey Results. September 21, 2014

Frequently Asked Questions: Sentencing Guidelines (6 th Edition & 6 th Edition, Revised) and General Sentencing Issues

Select Florida Mandatory Minimum Laws

POLICY AND OPERATING PROCEDURE

CONFERENCE COMMITTEE REPORT BRIEF HOUSE BILL NO HB 2490 would amend various statutes related to criminal sentencing.

Advanced Higher Modern Studies Approved List of Dissertations. Revised, August 2008

Supreme Court of Florida

Subject: Offences Committed Against Peace Officers Date: October 2015

NOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION. No. 114,180 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF KANSAS. STATE OF KANSAS, Appellee,

THE ABC S OF CO AND ACCA FEDERAL PUBLIC DEFENDER CJA PANEL SEMINAR DECEMBER 15, 2017

Supplement No. 16 published with Extraordinary Gazette No. 71, dated 9 September, 2016.

Jurisdiction Profile: Massachusetts

Title 17-A: MAINE CRIMINAL CODE

CERTIFICATION PROCEEDING

STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS

Sentencing Reform, the Federal Criminal Justice System,and Judicial and Prosecutorial Discretion

The 2007 National Justice Survey: Tackling Crime and Public Confidence

ll1. THE SENTENCING COMMISSION

Attitudes toward Immigration: Iowa Republican Caucus-Goers

ll1. THE SENTENCING COMMISSION

STEM CELL RESEARCH AND THE NEW CONGRESS: What Americans Think

21. Creating criminal offences

Criminal Justice in America CJ Chapter 11 James J. Drylie, Ph.D.

THE TASKFORCE ON THE REVIEW OF THE MANDATORY NATURE OF THE DEATH PENALTY IN KENYA MARYANN NJAU-KIMANI

Jurisdiction Profile: Washington, D.C.

ll1. THE SENTENCING COMMISSION

Selected Ohio Felony Sentencing Statutes Ohio Rev. Code Ann

Washington, D.C Washington, D.C

Sexual Offences Definitive Guideline DEFINITIVE GUIDELINE

X. COOK ISLANDS CRIMES (INTERNATIONALLY PROTECTED PERSONS AND HOSTAGES) ACT 1982, NO. 6

Guidelines on the Investigation, Cautioning and Charging of Knife Crime Offences

THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

$100 Question from Sentencing. The imposition of a criminal sanction by a sentencing authority, such as a judge.

DEFINITIVE GUIDELINE. Sexual Offences Definitive Guideline

Public Opinion & Political Development in Hong Kong. Survey Results. May 27, 2015

Guide to sanctioning

Transcription:

Public Opinion on the Death Penalty: Findings from a Singapore survey Tan Ern Ser Department of Sociology, NUS May 27, 2017 The Death Penalty: Yea or Nay? MARUAH

Methodology Sampling frame: Singaporeans, aged 18 to 74. Sample size = 1500 Oversampling of Malays and Indians, and weighted Based on a random sample of addresses purchased from the Department of Statistics Fieldwork period: Apr 9 to May 31, 2016

6 major topics 1. Interest and knowledge 2. Support for DP, general and specific; mandatory and discretionary 3. What if there are compelling reasons against DP? 4. Judging 12 scenario cases, mitigating and aggravating factors. To what extent do respondents differ from judges? 5. Perceived effective alternative measures for reducing violent crimes leading to death and for drug trafficking 6. Support for DP by Demographics

Topics 1-2: Interest and knowledge Support for DP, general & specific Interest and Knowledge Support for the DP in general Support for the DP for specific offences--murder, drug trafficking, and for firearms offences and preference for mandatory or discretionary sentence Extent of support for mandatory DP Reason(s) for support of mandatory sentence Reason (s) for support of discretionary sentence

Interest and Knowledge Indicators of Interest Proportion Questions Proportion interested and concerned 50% What if they were more interested? Talk with others about DP frequently 15% Indicators of Knowledge Know something about the issue 39% Proportion who gave a good estimate of the number of DP meted out past 10 years (Actual = 32) 24% Those interested/concerned more likely to support the DP. What if they were more well informed? Those who said they are well informed more likely to support DP.

Support for the Death Penalty in General Support or Oppose? Proportion Support 62% Strongly Support 8% Oppose 24% Strongly Oppose 3% Not Sure 3% 70% Comparative figure from a REACH survey is 80%

Support for Mandatory/ Discretionary Sentence (%) Crime Support for DP Support Mandatory DP (strong support) Support Discretionary DP MDP - DDP Murder 92 47 (33) Drug trafficking 86 32 (22) Firearms offences 88 36 (28) 45 +2 54-22 52-16 Top reason deterrent effect circumstances differ DDP > MDP Except for murder

Topic 3: 12 scenario cases, mitigating and aggravating factors 2 rotations of 6 scenarios each (to prevent response bias and for reliability check) Half of sample responded to Rotation 1; the other half, Rotation 2. Each rotation has 3 cases of murder, 2 cases of drug trafficking, and 1 case of firearm offence. In total, 12 scenario cases. All cases were sentenced to death by the judge. To what extent did our respondents concur with the judge?

12 scenario cases: To what extent do the judge and the respondents concur on the DP? (%) Crime Case R01 R02 Mean Implications Murder B18 52% mitigating 64% aggravating B19 51% 17% B20 28% 58% Drug Trafficking B21 47% 17% Firearms offences B22 21% 33% 45% 29% B23 25% 32% 28% Mitigating, e.g., no previous conviction. The highest proportion was 64%, as compared to 92%, who supported DP for murder. 12% chose the DP for all cases they judge, as compared to 100%. The highest proportion was 47%, as compared to 86%, who supported DP for drug trafficking. 10% chose the DP for all cases they judge, as compared to 100%.

Topic 4: What If s What if there is evidence to prove that DP is not a better deterrence than life/long imprisonment? What if innocent people have in fact sometimes been executed? What if most countries have abolished mandatory DP, leaving the decision to the judge?

WHAT IF DP is less of a deterrence or if innocent people have in fact been executed? Crime Generally in favor of DP Still favor DP, even if proven not a better deterrent than life/very long imprisonment Still favor DP, even if proven innocent people have been executed Murder 92 56 35 Drug Trafficking 86 43 28 Firearms offences 88 47 31

Main reason for preferring the DP Crime Main Reason Proportion of those who choose the DP Murder Retribution: a life for a life 26% to 39% Drug Trafficking Firearms offences Deterrence: deter others Gravity: a serious crime Deterrence: deter others Gravity: a serious crime Deterrence: deter others Deterrence is given as a key reason for choosing the DP. Does DP has a deterrent effect in practice? 38% to 45% 24% to 30% 57% to 61% 33% 50%

Topic 5: Perceived effective alternative measures for reducing violent crimes leading to death, and for drug trafficking More effective policing Better moral education More effective control More executions

Perceived effective alternative measures for reducing violent crimes leading to death or drug trafficking (%) Crime More effective policing Better moral education More effective control More executions Implications Murder 27 56 -- 5 Moral education preferred; DP, much less so. Drug Trafficking 24 52 17 7 Note: Figures refer to proportion who ranked the policy/measure as first choice

Topic 6: Support for DP by Demographics Gender Age Ethnicity Religion Religiosity Education Individual Income Household Income Housing Type Class

Support for the DP by Demographics Seniors (aged 66 or older), 1.8 times more likely than the young (aged 18 to 33). Those with degree qualifications, 1.7 times more likely than those with primary or lower education. Chinese religionists (Taoists/ Pai-Shen ), 2.3 times more likely than Protestants. Catholics, 2 times less likely than Protestants. Those who score high on religiosity, less likely to support DP. Note: I also found no significant difference between demographic categories in their preferred sentences in the 12 scenario cases. Perhaps, the generic question solicits a knee-jerk response, while the 12 scenario cases solicits a considered response.

A hypothesis A hypothesis on why the higher the educational level, the more likely to support DP Middle class subscribe to the ideology of security and meritocracy. The former translates into stronger support for law and order; the latter, into believing that one should get what one deserves, be it reward or punishment.

Conclusion Support for mandatory death penalty was much lower than might have been inferred from previous surveys which sought opinion about the death penalty in general. When placed in context, support for the death penalty, as shown by the scenario decisions, was weaker than often portrayed, in particular for drug trafficking and for firearms offences where no death or injury has occurred. When asked if the DP should be abolished, following international trends, about 72% said NO. My sense is that Singaporeans are more likely to support DDP, less so for MDP.