APPEALS, LITIGATION and WORKING WITH THE GENERAL COUNSEL

Similar documents
Overview of FOIA Litigation. ASAP National Training Conference. ASAP National Training Conference. Presented by Brent Evitt

Plaintiffs-Appellants, Docket Nos (L), 445(Con) DECLARATION OF SARAH S. NORMAND. SARAH S. NORMAND, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. ' 1746, declares as

Codified at 5 U.S.C. 552a. Passed in 1974, became effective September 27, Act passed in haste as an outgrowth of Watergate reforms and the

American Society of Access Professionals

Case 1:18-cv Document 1 Filed 07/05/18 Page 1 of 5 THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. Case No.

PROCEEDINGS: (IN CHAMBERS) (1) SUPPLEMENTAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT ORDER; AND (2) REQUEST FOR PREPARATION OF FINAL JUDGMENT

American Society of Access Professionals

Individual Rights (Data Privacy) Policy

Case 1:15-cv PKC Document 20 Filed 03/07/16 Page 1 of 10. Plaintiffs, 15 Civ (PKC) DECLARATION OF PAUL P. COLBORN

No CONSOLIDATED WITH Nos & IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT H. RAY LAHR, Plaintiff-Appellee,

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Knowledge, Skills & Abilities. FOIA Redaction Workshop Denver, Colorado. Instructors. Scott Hodes, Esq.

Case 1:06-cv CKK Document 31 Filed 05/18/09 Page 1 of 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case 1:17-cv Document 1 Filed 03/16/17 Page 1 of 11 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT. August Term Argued: October 25, 2016 Decided: December 20, 2016

Case 1:18-cv Document 1 Filed 08/07/18 Page 1 of 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Security ( DHS ) officials including ICE officers in field offices, detention facilities and

Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) Procedures and Guidelines

FOIA Exemptions 6 & 7C Personal Privacy Exemptions

HOUGHTON COUNTY. FOIA Procedures and Guidelines

H. R. ll. To amend section 552 of title 5, United States Code (commonly

Case 1:14-cv APM Document 24 Filed 03/10/16 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

The Procedural Requirements

Case 1:17-cv Document 1 Filed 08/30/17 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Recent Amendments to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The Mississippi Bar Convention Summer School for Lawyers 2016

FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT PROCEDURES & GUIDELINES

I. PURPOSE To establish procedures and guidelines governing the release of public records pursuant to Public Act 442 of 1976, as amended.

FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT PROCEDURES & GUIDELINES

Case 1:10-cv RMC Document 50 Filed 01/23/13 Page 1 of 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case 1:14-cv KMW Document 24 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/10/2015 Page 1 of 9

3. Do you think that the improved reporting requirements in the OPEN Government Act are enough to solve the backlog problem?

CITY OF KALAMAZOO FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT PROCEDURES & GUIDELINES

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

FREEDOM OF INFORMATION PROCEDURE Amended 12/14/00 - FA Amended 06/02/15 FA

Case 1:18-cv Document 1 Filed 04/23/18 Page 2 of Venue is proper in this district pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1391(e) and 5 U.S.C.

UNCLASSIFIED INSTRUCTION

Case 1:18-cv Document 1 Filed 08/15/18 Page 1 of 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case 1:16-cv KBJ Document 15 Filed 04/06/17 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT

Case 1:15-cv ARR-RLM Document 1 Filed 12/11/15 Page 1 of 12 PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

February 4, 2009, Date Last Declared Current: August 3, 2016 REQUESTS FOR SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION INFORMATION. Policy

LIVINGSTON COUNTY COMMUNITY MENTAL HEALTH AUTHORITY (LCCMHA) FOIA Policies, Procedures and Guidelines

To improve the Freedom of Information Act.

CITY FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT PROCEDURES AND GUIDELINES

Middlebury Township Freedom of Information Act Policy Resolution

MOTIONS PRACTICE BEFORE THE MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD AND THE EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION By Ernest C. Hadley and Sarah S.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

FOIA Request for Public Records Michigan Freedom of Information Act, Public Act 442 of 1976, MCL , et seq.

Case 1:12-cv Document 1 Filed 07/18/12 Page 1 of 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Using the New York State Freedom of Information Law

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 05/13/ :15 PM INDEX NO /2014 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 38 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/13/2015. Exhibit 1.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. Plaintiff, Defendants. INTRODUCTION

Standing Practice Order Pursuant to 20.1 of Act Establishing Rules Governing Practice and Procedure in Medical Assistance Provider Appeals

Supersedes the following Resolutions & Policies:

FOIA Request for Public Records Michigan Freedom of Information Act, Public Act 442 of 1976, MCL , et seq.

Case 5:18-cv Document 85 Filed 03/21/18 Page 1 of 13 PageID #: 7313

City of Pontiac. FOIA Procedures and Guidelines

TABLE OF CONTENTS LITIGATING IMMIGRATION CASES IN FEDERAL COURT

ASSERTING, CONTESTING, AND PRESERVING PRIVILEGES UNDER THE NEW RULES OF DISCOVERY

FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT

Case 1:18-cv Document 1 Filed 02/19/18 Page 2 of 10

Draft Rules on Privacy and Access to Court Records

Case 1:17-cv Document 1 Filed 12/06/17 Page 1 of 7

Case 1:09-cv FM Document 26 Filed 10/13/10 Page 2 of 17 I. Background The relevant facts are undisputed. (See ECF No. 22 ( Times Reply Mem. ) at

FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT (FOIA) PROCEDURES AND GUIDELINES

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT Thurgood Marshall U.S. Courthouse 40 Foley Square, New York, NY Telephone:

Case 1:18-cv UNA Document 1 Filed 07/03/18 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE COMPLAINT

Charter Township of Sandstone

FOIA Exemptions 6 & 7C Personal Privacy Exemptions

) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

RULES OF PROCEDURE BEFORE THE COWLITZ COUNTY HEARINGS EXAMINER

Case 1:14-cv Document 1 Filed 11/12/14 Page 1 of 12

PUBLIC SUMMARY OF FOIA PROCEDURES AND GUIDELINES. The people shall be informed so that they may fully participate in the democratic process.

UNIFORM LAW COMMISSIONERS' MODEL STATE ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURE ACT (1981) ARTICLE I GENERAL PROVISIONS ARTICLE II

Ch. 41 MEDICAL ASSISTANCE APPEAL PROCEDURES 55 CHAPTER 41. MEDICAL ASSISTANCE PROVIDER APPEAL PROCEDURES GENERAL PROVISIONS

Case 1:18-cv Document 1 Filed 05/09/18 Page 1 of 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

THE PRIVACY ACT OF 1974 (As Amended) Public Law , as codified at 5 U.S.C. 552a

This is in response to your Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) requests and subsequent civil

VILLAGE OF OVID VILLAGE. Michigan Freedom of Information Act Procedures and Guidelines

Freedom of Information Act 2000 (FOIA) Decision notice

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

CITY OF GRAND LEDGE. Freedom of Information Act Procedures and Guidelines

Case 1:17-cv Document 1 Filed 04/19/17 Page 1 of 15 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) ) ) )

Case 1:17-cv Document 1 Filed 05/31/17 Page 1 of 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

COUNTY OF MARQUETTE FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT PROCEDURES & GUIDELINES

Guy s & St Thomas NHS Foundation Trust

CITY OF ESCANABA FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT PROCEDURES & GUIDELINES

Case 1:10-cv RMU Document 25 Filed 07/22/11 Page 1 of 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

VILLAGE OF CASNOVIA FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT PROCEDURES AND GUIDELINES (THE PROCEDURES ) I. INTRODUCTION

Freedom of Information Act 2000 (FOIA) Decision notice

WILLIAM J. OLSON, P.C. ATTORNEYS AT LAW

Case 1:16-cv-Of''l67-RDM Document 1 Filed 05/2?' 1 6 Page 1 of 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Standing. Carpenters Industrial Council v. Zinke, 854 F.3d 1 (D.C. Cir. 2017) (Kavanaugh, J.).

Case 3:07-cv SI Document 25 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 1 of 7

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) COMPLAINT

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF PULASKI COUNTY, ARKANSAS DIVISION

Case 1:11-cv JDB Document 3 Filed 02/17/12 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case 3:16-cv Document 1 Filed 04/19/16 Page 1 of 8

Transcription:

APPEALS, LITIGATION and WORKING WITH THE GENERAL COUNSEL Scott A. Hodes Ramona Branch Oliver With special appreciation to Richard Huff for his contributions to the slide presentation

APPEAL TIPS Make and Preserve Notes When Conducting Searches and Processing Records Handle it in a Timely Manner

Litigation Threshold Considerations How does the FOIA Officer learn that the agency has been sued Who represents the agency in court What part does the agency general counsel s office play Litigation advice from Main Justice (Elizabeth Shapiro (202) 514-5302)

Jurisdiction, Venue and Pleadings Jurisdiction Venue Complaint Answer

Exhaustion of Administrative Remedies Adverse determination, appeal, denial Deemed exhausted if agency is late Not exhausted if records not reasonably described or fees not paid Remedy for failure to exhaust is dismissal without prejudice

Mootness and Standard of Review Moot if all issues resolved De novo standard of review on almost all withholding issues Deference to agency in national security, readily reproducible, and electronic search causing interference Based on administrative record for fee waiver issues

Discovery Usually extremely limited Question of search often appropriate Not appropriate if agency will cover in its Vaughn declaration

Summary Judgment FOIA litigation resolved by motion No disputed facts, only question of how the law applies to facts No live testimony, submission of sworn statements Vaughn affidavits or Vaughn declarations

Vaughn Declarations Contents: Identify declarant State the number of records/pages being withheld and the number of pages released in full or in part Set forth procedural history of request, including relevant correspondence Describe the search for responsive records

Vaughn Declarations The Vaughn Index Describe records or portions of records withheld Identify each exemption claimed Connect each item withheld with the exemption asserted Demonstrate that all required elements of each exemption are satisfied

Types of Vaughn Declarations Traditional Vaughn declaration Document-by-document, page-by-page, line-by-line description of withheld information Useful when there are relatively few documents at issue

Types of Vaughn Declarations Coded declarations Useful for high-volume, multiple-exemption cases Two parts: Assigns an exemption code to each category of withheld information, for example (b)(7)(c)-1 for names of FBI Special Agents, (b)(7)(c)-2 for subject of an FBI investigation Attach copies of redacted records with appropriate code marked next to each deletion Privacy Act implications

Types of Vaughn Declarations Categorical or generic declaration Most frequently used in Exemption 7(A) cases (Bevis Declaration) Assigns a functional category to each type of record involved and describes how disclosure would harm on-going law enforcement proceedings Also can be used in some types of Exemption 6 and 7(C) cases

Types of Vaughn Declarations Glomar denial declaration Used only when an agency cannot confirm or deny the existence of records because it would reveal an exempt fact Records withheld section of declaration explains only what abstract fact would be disclosed if agency confirmed that there were or were not records Used most often for targeted requests involving Exemptions 1, 6 or 7C

Types of Vaughn Declarations Vaughning only a sample of records Used with a very large number of documents Requester and/or court must agree to using this type of declaration Sample by full document rather than by page If court disapproves of application of exemptions, may need to reprocess all records

In Camera Declaration Ex parte written only for judge Agency must still describe publicly as much as possible Most frequently used in Exemption 1 cases

Alternative to Vaughn Declarations FOIA expressly authorizes in camera inspection of records Judge does not need a security clearance to review classified material Physical security precautions needed Often done where judge finds agency bad faith Neither requester nor his attorney can review in camera submission

Duty to Segregate Declaration must specifically state that agency has disclosed all reasonably segregable non-exempt information If possible, give examples of the agency s efforts to disclose segregable non-exempt information If possible, describe any non-exempt information that was not disclosed

Foreseeable Harm Must Be Able to Demonstrate to Court that Foreseeable Harm Analysis Conducted Result of 2016 FOIA Law

Waiver of Exemptions in Litigation Because judicial review is de novo, exemptions may be asserted in litigation even thought they were not previously relied upon in the administrative stage of processing the request All exemptions must be asserted in the agency s Vaughn declaration

Waiver of Exemptions in Litigation District courts very reticent to permit assertion of new exemption after adverse decision Unlikely that agency will be permitted to assert a new exemption on remand after a court of appeals rules that the agency s first asserted exemption inapplicable Exemption 7(A) problems

Attorney Fees A. Eligibility Requester must have representational relationship with an attorney Requester will have substantially prevailed only if it has obtained a judicially sanctioned alteration of the legal relationship of the parties or A voluntary change in the position of the agency

Attorney Fees B. Entitlement Court will consider the: Public benefit Commercial benefit to requester The nature of the requester s interest in the records sought Whether the agency s withholding had a reasonable basis in law