Oklahoma Marijuana Arrests

Similar documents
Connecticut Marijuana Arrests

Vermont Marijuana Arrests

Maryland Marijuana Arrests

Oregon Marijuana Arrests

Washington Marijuana Arrests

University of Oklahoma Libraries Western History Collections. Jessie E. Moore Collection

Louisiana Marijuana Arrests

Arkansas Marijuana Arrests

Pennsylvania Marijuana Arrests

Wisconsin Marijuana Arrests

2018 STATE OF OKLAHOMA CANDIDATE FILING PACKET

Constitution NOTE: ALL NEW RULES, REGULATIONS, AND POLICIES ARE UNDERLINED AND EFFECTIVE JULY 1, CONSTITUTION

Tennessee Marijuana Arrests

OKLAHOMA OFFICIALS ASSOCIATION (OOA) CONSTITUTION

Missouri Marijuana Arrests

Illinois Marijuana Arrests

Constitution NOTE: ALL NEW RULES, REGULATIONS, AND POLICIES ARE UNDERLINED AND EFFECTIVE JULY 1, CONSTITUTION

OKLAHOMA OFFICIALS ASSOCIATION (OOA) CONSTITUTION

Georgia Marijuana Arrests

School Nutrition Association. Of Oklahoma

OKLAHOMA REPUBLICAN PARTY

STATE OF OKLAHOMA. 2nd Session of the 53rd Legislature (2012) AS INTRODUCED

STATE OF OKLAHOMA. 1st Session of the 54th Legislature (2013) AS INTRODUCED

Pull Factors: A Measure of Retail Sales Success Estimates for 77 Oklahoma Cities (2018) July 2018

Oklahoma State Senators

Oklahoma State House of Representatives

With the notable exception of the migration of Oklahomans to California during the Dust Bowl years in

STATE OF OKLAHOMA. 2nd Extraordinary Session of the 56th Legislature (2018) HOUSE BILL 1027 By: Echols of the House AS INTRODUCED

AN ANALYSIS OF THE LABOR FORCE OF THE LAWTON, OKLAHOMA LABOR MARKET

Oklahoma State 4-H Leadership Council. Ratified Bylaws. Revised 2/2011 1

University of Oklahoma Libraries Western History Collections. Raymond Gary Collection

Case 4:17-cv CVE-JFJ Document 76 Filed in USDC ND/OK on 02/01/18 Page 1 of 93 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA

AN ANALYSIS OF THE LABOR FORCE OF THE OKMULGEE AREA IN NORTHEAST OKLAHOMA

STATE OF OKLAHOMA RETAIL COMPENDIUM OF LAW

Regional Commuting Patterns and Workforce Mobility within the Greater Oklahoma City Partnership Region

Bylaws of AIA Eastern Oklahoma A Chapter of The American Institute of Architects

PRINT POWER ADD PRINT, ADD POWER. OKLAHOMA PRESS SERVICE 3601 N. Lincoln Blvd., Oklahoma City, OK ops ad placement service

THE TALE OF TWO OKLAHOMAS: HOW, WHEN, AND WHY EASTERN OKLAHOMA WENT RED. EMILY ALBERTY University of Arkansas. ANDREW DOWDLE University of Arkansas

Justice Reinvestment in Oklahoma Initial Work Group Meeting

Survey Conducted by the University of Oklahoma Public Opinion Learning Laboratory. Report prepared by. Dr. Mary Outwater, Director OU POLL

Produced by: SAFE City Program Interpersonal Violence Prevention Team February 2003 (907)

FOCUS. Native American Youth and the Juvenile Justice System. Introduction. March Views from the National Council on Crime and Delinquency

University of Oklahoma Libraries Western History Collections. William Charles Rogers Collection

COOLIDGE POLICE DEPARTMENT. Monthly Activity Report

1615 L Street, NW, Suite 700 Washington, DC (main) (fax)

Current Trends in Juvenile Incarceration. Presented by Barry Krisberg April 25, 2012

REGISTERED REPUBLICANS (43.6%) OUTNUMBERED DEMOCRATS (43.5%) IN OKLAHOMA FOR THE FIRST TIME IN STATE HISTORY. IN OKLAHOMA 60.3% 58% 60.1% 56.

CENTER FOR URBAN POLICY AND THE ENVIRONMENT MAY 2007

What Travel Trends Might Tell Us About the Future

Louisiana Data Analysis Part 1: Prison Trends. Justice Reinvestment Task Force August 11, 2016

Chapter 14. Oklahoma Territory

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

The Impact of Drug and Marijuana Arrests Within the Largest Cities of Massachusetts

WASHINGTON COALITION OF MINORITY LEGAL PROFESSIONALS

University of Oklahoma Libraries Western History Collections. George Nelson Collection

SECTION 1. Demographic and Economic Profiles of California s Population

Economic Trends Report: Miami County

OKLAHOMA S MEMORIAL HIGHWAYS & BRIDGES

Prisoners in Bulletin. Bureau of Justice Statistics

Maine Statistical Analysis Center. USM Muskie School of Public Service.

DETENTION SERVICES. There are 2,057 secure detention beds currently in operation in the State of Florida.

In the Supreme Court of the United States

ATTACHMENT 16. Source and Accuracy Statement for the November 2008 CPS Microdata File on Voting and Registration

Components of Population Change by State

Grade 9 Geography Chapter 15 - Population. 1. What are the four general ways in which the population of Canada increases and decreases?

Key Facts. There are 2,057 secure detention beds in Florida. 55,170 youth were admitted to secure detention.

Private Sector Commission

What to Expect from This Session

Probation and Parole in the United States, 2015

Demographic Changes, Health Disparities, and Tuberculosis

Extrapolated Versus Actual Rates of Violent Crime, California and the United States, from a 1992 Vantage Point

CITY OF PUNTA GORDA POLICE DEPARTMENT I N T E R O F F I C E M E M O R A N D U M

Summary and Interpretation of the Federal Bureau of Investigation s Uniform Crime Report, 2005

CHANGING DEMOGRAPHICS OF THE STATE EXECUTIVE SERVICE: A RESEARCH NOTE*

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY RESPONSE TO HOUSE CONCURRENT RESOLUTION NO. 62 TWENTY-FIRST LEGISLATURE, 2002

info Poverty in the San Diego Region SANDAG December 2013

DISPROPORTIONATE MINORITY CONTACT

Incarcerated America Human Rights Watch Backgrounder April 2003

Master Organ Rolls, Circa 1920 Nominated by the American Organ Institute Archives and Library Norman, OK. I vote for the Master Organ Rolls.

Bulletin. Probation and Parole in the United States, Bureau of Justice Statistics. Revised 7/2/08

CENTER ON JUVENILE AND CRIMINAL JUSTICE

Pulling Open the Sticky Door

Chapter 2: Population Size and Composition

Who Is In Our State Prisons?

Barbados. POLICE 2. Crimes recorded in criminal (police) statistics, by type of crime including attempts to commit crimes

Population Aging, Immigration and Future Labor Shortage : Myths and Virtual Reality

The Crime Drop in Florida: An Examination of the Trends and Possible Causes

AN ANALYSIS OF THE LABOR FORCE OF THE PONCA CITY AREA IN NORTHEAST OKLAHOMA

Union Byte By Cherrie Bucknor and John Schmitt* January 2015

Section One SYNOPSIS: UNIFORM CRIME REPORTING PROGRAM. Synopsis: Uniform Crime Reporting System

Evidence-Based Policy Planning for the Leon County Detention Center: Population Trends and Forecasts

Alaska Data Analysis Part 1: Prison Drivers

Department of Justice

Chapter 1: The Demographics of McLennan County

University of Oklahoma Libraries Western History Collections. Chickasaw Nation Collection

Native American Senate Documents 60th Congress (1908) 94th Congress (1975)

Economic Trends Report: Atchison

Post Name City. VFW Post 1202 Ada Post Ada. VFW Post 4876 Butch O Neal Post Altus. VFW Post 2847 Black-Wing Post Alva

FOCUS. Views from the National Council on Crime and Delinquency. Accelerated Release: A Literature Review

California s Congressional District 37 Demographic Sketch

Transcription:

Working to Reform Marijuana Laws The NORML Almanac of Marijuana Arrest Statistics Oklahoma Marijuana Arrests Marijuana Arrests 1995-2002 (Summary) Marijuana Possession Arrests-2002 (Demographics) Marijuana Sales Arrests-2002 (Demographics) Marijuana Arrests by County 1998-2002

Introduction The NORML Almanac of Marijuana Arrest Statistics provides detailed data on the distribution and composition of marijuana arrests to supplement the analysis and data contained in NORML s 2005 report Crimes of Indiscretion: Marijuana Arrests in the United States. The data used for these tables were produced by the Uniform Crime Reports (UCR) program of the Department of Justice Federal Bureau of Investigation. Local police agencies report data to state agencies, which compile and report it to the national program office. Some local agencies do not participate in the program, and neither do some states. Florida, Illinois, and Washington D.C. did not report data to the UCR program in 2002, though some Illinois data was obtained directly from the state for this report. This report relies on two UCR data sets. UCR County Level Detailed Arrest and Offense Data have been used to generate state and county level arrest totals and rates, generally for the years 1995 to 2002. Countylevel data are reported along with codes that indicate 9 categories of population sizes. Generally the largest arrest rates reported are for small jurisdictions with significant numbers of arrests of non residents, such as in a popular vacation area. The UCR Age, Sex, and Race file has been used along with US Census population data to produce arrest rates by demographic category for marijuana possession and sales arrests in 2002. The four categories used for race based data in the UCR program are White, Black, Indian (Native American), and Asian. The race based data are also subdivided by general age group: adult, juvenile, and all. Age/sex data are presented in two formats. The primary presentation utilizes five year age categories for males, females, and both. Age/sex data are also presented using single year categories for age 15 to age 24 to highlight the impact of marijuana arrests on these specific age groups. All arrest rates reported in these tables are per 100,000 population. Some arrests rates may vary due to differences in the data sets; for example the arrest rate for possession derived from the county level file may be 200 while the same arrest rate derived from the age, sex and race file may be 192. Data reported in these tables may also differ from reports from state criminal justice agencies; UCR files are frequently updated at the state level. State sections include the following additional data: marijuana arrests as a percentage of drug arrests, marijuana arrests as a percentage of all arrests, the 2002 Census population, 2002 reporting coverage for demographic data, and the maximum state penalties for possession or sale of 1 ounce of marijuana. Marijuana arrests as a percentage of all drug arrests indicate the resources marijuana offenses take away from other drug control efforts. Marijuana arrests as a percentage of all arrests provide an index of the cost of marijuana enforcement in a state; the percentage of all arrests indicates a general percentage of overall criminal justice costs that can be attributed to marijuana. The maximum penalties indicate the potential severity of punishment for marijuana offenses; these data also help characterize the potential cost of state marijuana laws under conditions of maximum enforcement. Jon B. Gettman, Ph.D. National Organization for the Reform of Marijuana Laws Page 1

Key to Almanac Tables Marijuana Arrests 1995 2002 Source: Uniform Crime Reporting Program Data: County level Detailed Arrest and Offense Data. [Computer File] All: Both adults and juveniles. Adults: Age 18 and older. Juvenile: Under age 18. Arrests: Total marijuana arrests, possession and sales arrests combined. Rate: The arrest rate per 100,000 for all marijuana offenses is calculated by dividing the number of arrests by the coverage population and multiplying the result by 100,000. Pct of Drug Arrests: The percent of drug arrests represented by marijuana arrests. This figure is calculated by dividing the number of marijuana arrests by the number of all arrests for drug offenses. Pct of All Arrests: The percentage of all arrests represented by marijuana arrests. This figure is calculated by dividing the number of marijuana arrests by the number of arrests for all criminal offenses. Marijuana Sales/Possession Arrests 2002 Source: Uniform Crime Reporting Program Data: Arrests by Age, Sex, and Race. [Computer File] Population: The total population estimated by the U.S. Census. population. This figure is calculated by dividing the coverage population by the census population for a region. Poss. Max: The maximum penalty for possession of 1 ounce of marijuana. Sales. Max: The maximum penalty for sales of one ounce of marijuana. Arrest Rate: The arrest rate per 100,000 population, calculated by dividing the number of arrests by the population served by the arresting police agencies and multiplying the result by 100,000. Adults: Individuals age 18 and older. Juveniles: Individuals under the age of 18. Rate: The demographic composition of coverage populations has been estimated using U.S. Census data and used to calculate arrest rates for marijuana offenses per 100,000 population for specific demographic groups. Arrest Pct.: The percentage of arrests for the offense accounted for by the demographic group. Pop. Pct.: The estimated percentage of the regional population accounted for by the demographic group. Ratio: The ratio produced by dividing Arrest Pct by Pop. Pct. by the population percentage. A group that accounts for equal shares of marijuana possession arrests and the general population will have a ratio of 1.0. Coverage: The percentage of the total population represented by the coverage Page 2 www.norml.org

Marijuana Arrests by County 1998 2002 Source: Uniform Crime Reporting Program Data: County level Detailed Arrest and Offense Data. [Computer File] Population Size: Nine categories are used to distinguish counties of similar population size. Special circumstances are more likely to disproportionately affect arrest rates in counties with smaller resident populations, such as high numbers of vacation visitors for beach and mountain resort areas. Arrests: Total marijuana arrests, possession and sales arrests combined. Arrest Rates: The arrest rate per 100,000 for all marijuana offenses is calculated by dividing the number of arrests by the coverage population and multiplying the result by 100,000. Rank (Rates): Ranking among all the counties in the State, from highest (1) to lowest. Population Size Codes Size 1 Population < 2,500 Size 2 Population 2,500 to 9,999 Size 3 Population 10,000 to 24,999 Size 4 Population 25,000 to 49,999 Size 5 Population 50,000 to 99,999 Size 6 Population 100,000 to 249,999 Size 7 Population 250,000 to 499,999 Size 8 Population 500,000 to 999,999 Size 9 Population 1,000,000 + Notes on the Calculation of Age and Race Specific Arrest Rates at the County, State, and National Level 1. County level Totals and Arrest Rates. Local agency data from the UCR Age, Sex, and Race file are combined to produce county level totals and arrest rates for the overall population. While the agency level file provides data on the number of blacks arrested by each agency, for example, it does not provide data on the local black population. However calculation of the arrest rate for blacks can take place at the county level through the use of Census Bureau data on county level populations. 2. State, and National Level Totals and Arrest Rates. County level data are combined to produce state, and national level totals of coverage populations and arrests by offense, providing a basis for calculating the arrest rate for the overall coverage population. 3. Demographic based Arrest Rates. The coverage population for Blacks in each region, for example, can be estimated using Census data on the overall Black population of the region. If Blacks comprise 65% of the population of a county, for example, these tables are based on the premise that Blacks also comprise 65% of the coverage population reported in the UCR data for that county. The estimation of the Black population within the overall coverage population provides a basis for calculating the arrest rates for Blacks in the region. 4. Coverage Indicators. A comparison of the coverage population of the reporting local agencies and the overall census population produces a coverage indicator indicating the extent the reported data represents a particular region and its diversity. National Organization for the Reform of Marijuana Laws Page 3

Oklahoma Marijuana Arrests 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 All Arrests 8,426 8,709 10,127 11,518 11,051 12,500 11,665 11,167 All Rate 257.05 263.83 305.31 344.13 329.09 362.25 337.13 319.63 All Pct. Of Drug Arrests 59.79% 60.65% 58.86% 57.75% 56.48% 56.49% 53.34% 50.48% All Pct. Of All Arrests 5.46% 5.67% 6.37% 6.75% 7.28% 7.53% 7.06% 6.70% Adult Arrests 7,340 7,474 8,620 9,985 10,358 10,798 10,142 9,769 Adult Rate 223.92 226.42 259.87 298.33 308.46 312.93 293.11 279.62 Adult Pct. Of Drug Arrests 52.08% 52.05% 50.10% 50.06% 52.94% 48.80% 46.38% 44.16% Adult Pct. Of All Arrests 4.76% 4.87% 5.42% 5.85% 6.83% 6.50% 6.14% 5.86% Juvenile Arrests 1,087 1,235 1,507 1,533 690 1,701 1,521 1,398 Juvenile Rate 33.16 37.41 45.43 45.80 20.55 49.30 43.96 40.01 Juvenile Pct. Of Drug Arrests 7.71% 8.60% 8.76% 7.69% 3.53% 7.69% 6.96% 6.32% Juvenile Pct. Of All Arrests 0.70% 0.80% 0.95% 0.90% 0.45% 1.02% 0.92% 0.84% Oklahoma Marijuana Possession Arrests 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 All Arrests 7,223 7,291 8,770 10,183 9,788 11,198 10,595 10,074 All Rate 220.35 220.87 264.40 304.24 291.48 324.52 306.21 288.35 All Pct. Of Drug Arrests 51.25% 50.77% 50.98% 51.05% 50.02% 50.61% 48.45% 45.54% All Pct. Of All Arrests 4.68% 4.75% 5.52% 5.97% 6.45% 6.75% 6.41% 6.04% Adult Arrests 6,211 6,213 7,401 8,758 9,146 9,631 9,167 8,770 Adult Rate 189.48 188.22 223.12 261.67 272.36 279.11 264.93 251.02 Adult Pct. Of Drug Arrests 44.07% 43.27% 43.02% 43.91% 46.74% 43.53% 41.92% 39.65% Adult Pct. Of All Arrests 4.03% 4.05% 4.66% 5.13% 6.03% 5.80% 5.55% 5.26% Juvenile Arrests 1,013 1,078 1,369 1,425 639 1,566 1,427 1,304 Juvenile Rate 30.90 32.66 41.27 42.58 19.03 45.38 41.24 37.32 Juvenile Pct. Of Drug Arrests 7.19% 7.51% 7.96% 7.14% 3.27% 7.08% 6.53% 5.90% Juvenile Pct. Of All Arrests 0.66% 0.70% 0.86% 0.83% 0.42% 0.94% 0.86% 0.78% Oklahoma Marijuana Sales Arrests 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 All Arrests 1,203 1,418 1,357 1,335 1,263 1,302 1,070 1,093 All Rate 36.70 42.96 40.91 39.89 37.61 37.73 30.92 31.28 All Pct. Of Drug Arrests 8.54% 9.87% 7.89% 6.69% 6.45% 5.88% 4.89% 4.94% All Pct. Of All Arrests 0.78% 0.92% 0.85% 0.78% 0.83% 0.78% 0.65% 0.66% Adult Arrests 1,129 1,261 1,219 1,227 1,212 1,167 975 999 Adult Rate 34.44 38.20 36.75 36.66 36.09 33.82 28.18 28.59 Adult Pct. Of Drug Arrests 8.01% 8.78% 7.09% 6.15% 6.19% 5.27% 4.46% 4.52% Adult Pct. Of All Arrests 0.73% 0.82% 0.77% 0.72% 0.80% 0.70% 0.59% 0.60% Juvenile Arrests 74 157 138 108 51 135 94 94 Juvenile Rate 2.26 4.76 4.16 3.23 1.52 3.91 2.72 2.69 Juvenile Pct. Of Drug Arrests 0.53% 1.09% 0.80% 0.54% 0.26% 0.61% 0.43% 0.42% Juvenile Pct. Of All Arrests 0.05% 0.10% 0.09% 0.06% 0.03% 0.08% 0.06% 0.06% Page 4 www.norml.org

Oklahoma Marijuana Possession Arrests - 2002 Population 3,493,714 Arrest Rate Adults White Black Indian Asian Coverage 100.00% 2000 324.13 Rate 285.89 636.95 165.39 47.51 Poss. Max. 12 months 2001 303.77 Arrest Pct. 67.57% 15.29% 4.05% 0.20% Sales Max. Life 2002 288.00 Pop. Pct. 60.51% 5.30% 5.30% 1.20% Ratio 1.12 2.88 0.76 0.17 All White Black Indian Asian Juveniles White Black Indian Asian Rate 321.40 831.01 219.88 47.82 Rate 166.70 222.64 56.98 46.51 Arrest Pct. 78.01% 17.21% 4.57% 0.26% Arrest Pct. 10.44% 1.92% 0.53% 0.06% Pop. Pct. 78.54% 7.78% 7.96% 1.57% Pop. Pct. 18.03% 2.48% 2.66% 0.37% Ratio 0.99 2.21 0.57 0.17 Ratio 0.58 0.77 0.20 0.16 Total Age 15-19 Age 20-24 Age 25-29 Age 30-34 Age 35-39 Age 40-44 Age 45-59 Age 50-54 Age 55-59 Age 60-64 Rate 1,086.43 1,040.42 554.05 384.01 340.67 276.91 132.10 68.39 31.75 13.05 Arrest Pct. 28.20% 27.78% 12.61% 8.75% 8.04% 7.31% 3.33% 1.53% 0.60% 0.20% Pop. Pct. 7.47% 7.69% 6.56% 6.56% 6.80% 7.61% 7.26% 6.45% 5.41% 4.39% Ratio 3.78 3.61 1.92 1.33 1.18 0.96 0.46 0.24 0.11 0.05 Male Age 15-19 Age 20-24 Age 25-29 Age 30-34 Age 35-39 Age 40-44 Age 45-59 Age 50-54 Age 55-59 Age 60-64 Rate 1,736.86 1,687.89 862.74 573.43 479.29 403.29 214.29 114.44 55.75 27.48 Arrest Pct. 23.19% 23.35% 10.13% 6.62% 5.66% 5.29% 2.67% 1.25% 0.51% 0.20% Pop. Pct. 3.84% 3.98% 3.38% 3.32% 3.40% 3.78% 3.59% 3.15% 2.62% 2.08% Ratio 6.04 5.87 3.00 1.99 1.66 1.40 0.74 0.40 0.19 0.10 Female Age 15-19 Age 20-24 Age 25-29 Age 30-34 Age 35-39 Age 40-44 Age 45-59 Age 50-54 Age 55-59 Age 60-64 Rate 397.45 344.47 225.37 189.35 201.61 152.38 51.54 24.33 9.23 0.00 Arrest Pct. 5.01% 4.43% 2.48% 2.13% 2.38% 2.03% 0.66% 0.28% 0.09% 0.00% Pop. Pct. 3.63% 3.71% 3.18% 3.23% 3.39% 3.83% 3.67% 3.29% 2.79% 2.30% Ratio 1.38 1.19 0.78 0.66 0.70 0.53 0.18 0.09 0.03 0.00 Total Age 15 Age 16 Age 17 Age 18 Age 19 Age 20 Age 21 Age 22 Age 23 Age24 Rate 402.12 815.41 1,019.07 1,538.23 1,578.40 1,290.07 1,208.81 996.60 892.07 774.63 Arrest Pct. 1.99% 4.11% 5.27% 8.13% 8.70% 7.14% 6.72% 5.51% 4.60% 3.82% Pop. Pct. 1.42% 1.45% 1.49% 1.52% 1.59% 1.59% 1.60% 1.59% 1.49% 1.42% Ratio 1.40 2.83 3.54 5.34 5.48 4.48 4.20 3.46 3.10 2.69 Male Age 15 Age 16 Age 17 Age 18 Age 19 Age 20 Age 21 Age 22 Age 23 Age24 Rate 604.68 1,243.38 1,637.13 2,522.11 2,532.57 2,079.23 1,984.29 1,592.92 1,436.08 1,274.41 Arrest Pct. 1.53% 3.22% 4.34% 6.89% 7.21% 5.98% 5.77% 4.56% 3.78% 3.25% Pop. Pct. 0.73% 0.75% 0.76% 0.79% 0.82% 0.83% 0.84% 0.82% 0.76% 0.73% Ratio 2.10 4.32 5.68 8.76 8.79 7.22 6.89 5.53 4.99 4.42 Female Age 15 Age 16 Age 17 Age 18 Age 19 Age 20 Age 21 Age 22 Age 23 Age24 Rate 189.54 364.17 367.37 486.36 559.51 434.41 356.57 354.82 326.25 238.36 Arrest Pct. 0.46% 0.89% 0.92% 1.24% 1.49% 1.15% 0.94% 0.94% 0.82% 0.57% Pop. Pct. 0.69% 0.71% 0.72% 0.74% 0.77% 0.76% 0.76% 0.77% 0.73% 0.68% Ratio 0.66 1.26 1.28 1.69 1.94 1.51 1.24 1.23 1.13 0.83 National Organization for the Reform of Marijuana Laws Page 5

Oklahoma Marijuana Sales Arrests - 2002 Population 3,493,714 Arrest Rate Adults White Black Indian Asian Coverage 100.00% 2000 37.71 Rate 29.08 84.26 20.85 10.96 Poss. Max. 12 months 2001 30.67 Arrest Pct. 66.73% 19.34% 4.77% 0.55% Sales Max. Life 2002 31.23 Pop. Pct. 60.51% 5.30% 5.30% 1.20% Ratio 1.10 3.65 0.90 0.46 All White Black Indian Asian Juveniles White Black Indian Asian Rate 34.43 114.01 28.09 14.35 Rate 11.11 20.76 6.45 0.00 Arrest Pct. 73.14% 20.99% 5.32% 0.55% Arrest Pct. 6.42% 1.65% 0.55% 0.00% Pop. Pct. 78.54% 7.78% 7.96% 1.57% Pop. Pct. 18.03% 2.48% 2.66% 0.37% Ratio 0.93 2.70 0.67 0.35 Ratio 0.36 0.67 0.21 0.00 Total Age 15-19 Age 20-24 Age 25-29 Age 30-34 Age 35-39 Age 40-44 Age 45-59 Age 50-54 Age 55-59 Age 60-64 Rate 86.93 116.51 67.24 39.71 41.69 36.87 24.45 8.88 6.35 1.31 Arrest Pct. 20.81% 28.69% 14.12% 8.34% 9.07% 8.98% 5.68% 1.83% 1.10% 0.18% Pop. Pct. 7.47% 7.69% 6.56% 6.56% 6.80% 7.61% 7.26% 6.45% 5.41% 4.39% Ratio 2.79 3.73 2.15 1.27 1.33 1.18 0.78 0.28 0.20 0.04 Male Age 15-19 Age 20-24 Age 25-29 Age 30-34 Age 35-39 Age 40-44 Age 45-59 Age 50-54 Age 55-59 Age 60-64 Rate 140.71 181.08 101.60 56.83 58.86 55.34 39.03 12.72 10.93 2.75 Arrest Pct. 17.32% 23.10% 11.00% 6.05% 6.42% 6.69% 4.49% 1.28% 0.92% 0.18% Pop. Pct. 3.84% 3.98% 3.38% 3.32% 3.40% 3.78% 3.59% 3.15% 2.62% 2.08% Ratio 4.51 5.80 3.25 1.82 1.89 1.77 1.25 0.41 0.35 0.09 Female Age 15-19 Age 20-24 Age 25-29 Age 30-34 Age 35-39 Age 40-44 Age 45-59 Age 50-54 Age 55-59 Age 60-64 Rate 29.97 47.11 30.65 22.12 24.46 18.67 10.15 5.21 2.05 0.00 Arrest Pct. 3.48% 5.59% 3.12% 2.29% 2.66% 2.29% 1.19% 0.55% 0.18% 0.00% Pop. Pct. 3.63% 3.71% 3.18% 3.23% 3.39% 3.83% 3.67% 3.29% 2.79% 2.30% Ratio 0.96 1.51 0.98 0.71 0.78 0.60 0.32 0.17 0.06 0.00 Total Age 15 Age 16 Age 17 Age 18 Age 19 Age 20 Age 21 Age 22 Age 23 Age24 Rate 26.14 47.27 86.53 141.04 126.27 122.18 128.75 127.72 109.82 90.78 Arrest Pct. 1.19% 2.20% 4.12% 6.87% 6.42% 6.23% 6.60% 6.51% 5.22% 4.12% Pop. Pct. 1.42% 1.45% 1.49% 1.52% 1.59% 1.59% 1.60% 1.59% 1.49% 1.42% Ratio 0.84 1.51 2.77 4.52 4.04 3.91 4.12 4.09 3.52 2.91 Male Age 15 Age 16 Age 17 Age 18 Age 19 Age 20 Age 21 Age 22 Age 23 Age24 Rate 43.19 84.43 134.87 236.56 192.13 169.24 198.09 190.87 196.52 148.10 Arrest Pct. 1.01% 2.02% 3.30% 5.96% 5.04% 4.49% 5.32% 5.04% 4.77% 3.48% Pop. Pct. 0.73% 0.75% 0.76% 0.79% 0.82% 0.83% 0.84% 0.82% 0.76% 0.73% Ratio 1.38 2.70 4.32 7.58 6.15 5.42 6.34 6.11 6.29 4.74 Female Age 15 Age 16 Age 17 Age 18 Age 19 Age 20 Age 21 Age 22 Age 23 Age24 Rate 8.24 8.09 35.55 38.91 55.95 71.15 52.55 59.76 19.65 29.27 Arrest Pct. 0.18% 0.18% 0.82% 0.92% 1.37% 1.74% 1.28% 1.47% 0.46% 0.64% Pop. Pct. 0.69% 0.71% 0.72% 0.74% 0.77% 0.76% 0.76% 0.77% 0.73% 0.68% Ratio 0.26 0.26 1.14 1.25 1.79 2.28 1.68 1.91 0.63 0.94 Page 6 www.norml.org

Oklahoma Marijuana Arrests by County Rank Population Arrests Arrest Rates (Rates) Size 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2002 Adair 3 33 72 70 51 12 162.61 352.63 332.73 241.75 56.34 76 Alfalfa 2 16 15 31 27 19 261.82 247.36 507.78 441.03 307.39 39 Atoka 3 149 131 87 100 93 1,107.31 986.30 626.85 718.55 661.83 6 Beaver 2 4 7 7 20 21 66.28 115.19 119.52 340.54 354.13 30 Beckham 3 112 101 74 123 118 598.19 513.99 373.76 619.55 588.65 10 Blaine 3 35 38 28 45 29 323.30 356.44 236.81 379.55 242.23 51 Bryan 4 142 138 112 170 230 411.69 396.47 306.56 464.05 621.79 8 Caddo 4 127 193 121 126 133 406.91 620.86 397.45 412.74 431.48 17 Canadian 5 214 191 177 182 142 292.14 297.20 289.01 296.36 229.00 53 Carter 4 207 212 196 182 168 464.97 474.76 429.63 397.85 363.72 29 Cherokee 4 106 74 88 71 68 274.32 188.43 206.96 166.55 157.98 72 Choctaw 3 135 87 82 45 37 876.97 575.09 534.48 292.51 238.20 52 Cimarron 2 7 7 14 8 17 225.08 235.77 444.73 253.41 533.42 12 Cleveland 6 607 550 994 508 625 384.25 343.06 618.37 315.17 384.02 23 Coal 2 53 37 41 47 66 867.00 613.70 679.82 777.12 1,080.90 2 Comanche 6 285 328 359 266 238 247.85 287.99 312.18 230.68 204.41 61 Cotton 2 27 44 30 28 51 399.88 653.98 453.58 422.20 761.65 3 Craig 3 123 101 75 79 113 844.03 696.60 501.67 526.98 746.52 5 Creek 5 199 170 169 216 187 298.23 252.09 250.53 319.33 273.80 46 Custer 4 79 68 84 116 132 303.60 265.84 321.30 442.48 498.68 13 Delaware 4 57 71 94 97 81 166.74 207.18 253.53 260.91 215.78 57 Dewey 2 5 1 7 1 10 98.35 20.22 147.59 21.03 208.25 60 Ellis 2 2 10 7 0 1 46.94 232.23 171.78 0.00 24.24 77 Garfield 5 101 97 109 130 114 176.54 170.02 188.54 224.25 194.76 64 Garvin 4 281 164 127 129 90 1,030.81 604.36 466.74 472.80 326.69 34 Grady 4 112 170 160 126 131 244.47 368.84 351.80 276.28 284.48 44 Grant 2 5 5 3 8 9 91.78 93.35 58.32 155.10 172.81 68 Greer 2 22 26 14 30 23 341.88 407.01 230.98 493.58 374.84 26 Harmon 2 18 11 5 9 15 513.70 315.10 152.30 273.39 451.26 15 Harper 2 7 2 13 12 8 191.62 55.43 364.96 335.95 221.79 55 Haskell 3 100 74 49 35 48 870.25 648.78 415.54 296.01 402.04 19 Hughes 3 39 45 30 49 42 295.03 318.49 211.95 345.24 293.07 41 Jackson 4 45 44 40 44 27 155.32 152.42 140.65 154.29 93.77 75 Jefferson 2 31 25 23 17 13 460.69 378.50 337.34 248.65 188.32 65 Johnston 3 34 27 39 14 11 328.09 260.09 370.97 132.80 103.33 74 Kay 4 147 137 129 136 122 311.04 292.39 268.30 282.09 250.62 49 Kingfisher 3 31 11 32 39 79 227.91 81.04 229.79 279.29 560.32 11 Kiowa 3 14 15 11 17 18 128.15 140.86 107.56 165.77 173.83 67 Latimer 3 54 34 48 38 40 520.33 328.31 448.93 354.44 369.48 27 Le Flore 4 192 140 140 106 170 409.33 299.64 291.01 219.73 349.00 32 Lincoln 4 101 50 63 69 70 322.03 158.90 196.37 214.48 215.50 58 Logan 4 81 79 81 95 129 262.27 254.22 238.77 279.27 375.58 25 Love 2 35 67 57 33 35 403.50 782.25 645.45 372.67 391.46 21 McClain 4 133 148 175 186 140 510.58 562.46 630.06 667.84 497.85 14 McCurtain 4 94 132 166 112 115 270.53 378.21 482.53 324.68 330.16 33 McIntosh 3 37 47 54 93 76 195.07 245.89 277.55 476.70 385.81 22 National Organization for the Reform of Marijuana Laws Page 7

Oklahoma Marijuana Arrests by County Rank Population Arrests Arrest Rates (Rates) Size 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2002 Major 2 20 12 19 34 24 255.04 152.75 251.82 449.38 314.18 37 Marshall 3 44 64 95 70 59 362.02 517.46 720.57 529.50 442.01 16 Mayes 4 123 61 89 102 77 328.80 161.53 231.96 265.11 198.21 63 Murray 3 70 66 75 59 77 560.94 533.25 594.15 466.11 602.50 9 Muskogee 5 231 187 226 232 269 329.99 266.23 325.41 333.10 382.50 24 Noble 3 27 31 43 27 33 237.93 270.41 376.83 235.97 285.62 43 Nowata 3 26 12 9 20 13 260.21 119.96 85.15 188.71 121.48 73 Okfuskee 3 50 11 6 34 37 439.72 96.15 50.79 287.02 309.31 38 Oklahoma 8 2,122 2,259 2,536 2,261 2,081 307.98 323.67 345.49 307.19 280.01 45 Okmulgee 4 103 135 174 199 80 267.27 346.22 438.45 500.08 199.10 62 Osage 4 109 77 69 79 79 297.90 236.63 198.24 226.35 224.18 54 Ottawa 4 111 156 122 131 119 359.71 502.43 367.54 393.57 354.08 31 Pawnee 3 54 46 82 69 110 330.19 278.89 493.74 414.34 654.18 7 Payne 5 234 173 423 404 275 360.82 265.09 620.93 591.41 398.70 20 Pittsburg 4 93 80 71 94 114 213.37 186.29 161.54 213.28 256.17 48 Pontotoc 4 140 124 156 141 130 398.59 357.27 443.90 400.12 365.35 28 Pottawatomie 5 88 97 134 103 106 140.27 155.31 204.51 156.77 159.79 70 Pushmataha 3 25 27 17 22 38 215.33 232.30 145.71 188.05 321.68 35 Roger Mills 2 6 6 6 4 9 165.06 167.04 174.62 116.11 258.70 47 Rogers 5 145 116 190 173 160 218.87 169.69 263.24 239.04 218.95 56 Seminole 4 86 87 160 66 73 344.99 350.04 642.73 264.40 289.63 42 Sequoyah 4 404 388 425 522 634 1,085.55 1,030.33 1,090.53 1,335.76 1,606.73 1 Stephens 4 171 181 139 109 108 388.65 415.55 321.89 251.73 247.02 50 Texas 3 161 97 135 80 84 882.43 518.63 671.41 396.79 412.61 18 Tillman 2 19 9 8 16 15 195.01 94.39 86.14 171.82 159.52 71 Tulsa 8 2,036 2,076 2,277 2,243 1,886 372.18 368.28 392.51 385.59 321.10 36 Wagoner 4 228 132 82 96 80 416.87 277.51 168.22 196.40 162.09 69 Washington 4 85 66 87 100 151 177.69 138.42 177.56 203.53 304.37 40 Washita 3 24 16 29 28 21 203.53 135.18 252.04 242.70 180.27 66 Woods 2 9 14 38 65 69 108.10 166.79 418.09 713.19 749.76 4 Woodward 3 36 49 63 47 40 191.15 263.21 340.80 253.55 213.72 59 State Total 11,518 11,051 12,500 11,665 11,167 344.13 329.09 362.25 337.13 319.63 Page 8 www.norml.org