TOP SECRET//COMINT//NOFORN

Similar documents
IN RE APPLICATION OF THE FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION FOR AN ORDER REQUIRING THE PRODU THINGS FROM

TOP SECRET. (Security Classification) CONTROL NO. COPY. -HantHe-Vta. Channels

TOP SECRET//COMINT//NOFORN//MR UNITED STATES FOREIGN INTELLIGENCE SURVEILLANCE COURT WASHINGTON, D.C.

TOP SECRET//SI//NOFORN UNITED STATES FOREIGN INTELLIGENCE SURVEILLANCE WASEHNGTON, D. C. MOTION FOR AMENDMENT TO PRIMARY ORDER

UNITED STATES FOREIGN INTELLIGENCE SURVEILLANCE COURT WASHINGTON, D.C.

TOP SECRET//COMINTHNOFORN

Case3:13-cv JSW Document88 Filed03/10/14 Page1 of 4

TO:r SECJ.tr:T/tCOMI:Nf'i/NOFORNi/MR

SECRET//COMINT//NOFORN// EXIDBITB

PRIVACY AND CIVIL LIBERTIES OVERSIGHT BOARD. Recommendations Assessment Report

BILLS PENDING AS OF 9/11/13 THAT RELATE TO NSA SURVEILLANCE

JOINT STATEMENT FOR THE RECORD OF JAMES R. CLAPPER DIRECTOR OF NATIONAL INTELLIGENCE

UNITED STATES. FOREIGN INTELLIGENCE SURVEILLANCE COURJD/f /':. - - ' - :_; o~r:r ~ WASHINGTON, D. C., _ fl J I r".~! '''

Report on the Findings by the EU Co-chairs of the. ad hoc EU-US Working Group on Data Protection. 27 November 2013

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

TOP SECRET!/COMOO'//NO.i'ORN

Case4:08-cv JSW Document253 Filed06/27/14 Page1 of 31

TOP SECRET//COMINT//ORCON,NOFORN//MR

Report on the findings by the EU Co-chairs of the ad hoc EU-US Working Group on Data Protection

United States District Court

Notes on how to read the chart:

Case 1:15-cv TSE Document Filed 03/26/18 Page 1 of 5

Title: BUSINESS RECORDS ORDERS UNDER 50 U.S.C. 1861

Syllabus Law : Surveillance Law Seminar. George Mason University Law School Fall 2015 Arlington Hall, Hazel Hall. Professor Jake Phillips

On the Bulk Collection of Tangible Things

H. R. ll. To establish reasonable procedural protections for the use of national security letters, and for other purposes.

Case4:14-cv YGR Document75 Filed07/17/15 Page1 of 13

u.s. Foreign Intelligence.

UNITED STATES FOREIGN INTELLIGENCE SURVEILLANCE COURT

Template for Request for Expressions of Interest (REOI)

Testimony of Peter P. Swire

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF IDAHO

TOP SECRET//COMINT//ORCON,NOFORN//MR

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

REVOKED AS OF APRIL 11, 2016

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ~MORANDUM OPINION

United States Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court

ADMINISTRATION WHITE PAPER BULK COLLECTION OF TELEPHONY METADATA UNDER SECTION 215 OF THE USA PATRIOT ACT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

THE RUTHERFORD INSTITUTE

Issue Area Current Law S as reported by Senate Judiciary Comm. H.R as reported by House Judiciary Comm.

BERMUDA COPYRIGHT TRIBUNAL RULES 2014 BR 11 / 2014

H.R.3162 SEC EXPANSION OF THE BIOLOGICAL WEAPONS STATUTE. Chapter 10 of title 18, United States Code, is amended-- (1) in section 175--

CRS Report for Congress

Illinois Freedom of Information Act

FEB ' The Honorable John Boehner Speaker United States House of Representatives Washington, D.C

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Dear Members of the Judiciary Committee:

Deutscher Bundestag. 1st Committee of Inquiry. in the 18th electoral term. Hearing of Experts. Surveillance Reform After Snowden.

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF ALAMEDA

Case 1:17-cv RCL Document 11-7 Filed 11/02/17 Page 1 of 12

SECRET//COMINT//ORCON,NOFORN

CITY OF FAIRLAWN, OHIO MAYOR S COURT

CIVIL AVIATION AUTHORITY REGULATIONS 1972

[ORAL ARGUMENT NOT YET SCHEDULED] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

Arbitration Procedures Guide

Case 8:15-cv JLS-KES Document 43-4 Filed 07/25/17 Page 2 of 39 Page ID #:440 SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT RECITALS

GUIDE TO OIPC PROCESSES (PIPA)

Case 3:07-cv SI Document 25 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 1 of 7

THE ANTHONY GRAINGER INQUIRY RECOMMENDATIONS: ISSUES FOR CONSIDERATION [OPEN]

rdd Doc 825 Filed 12/11/17 Entered 12/11/17 16:29:55 Main Document Pg 1 of 4

CITY OF CLYDE HILL CRIMINAL HISTORY RECORDS INFORMATION POLICY Adopted by Resolution No.

THE GENERAL ADMINISTRATIVE CODE OF GEORGIA

COMMON GROUND BETWEEN COMPANY AND CIVIL SOCIETY SURVEILLANCE REFORM PRINCIPLES

CASE MANAGEMENT PROTOCOL OAKLAND COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT BUSINESS COURT CASES

National Security Letters in Foreign Intelligence Investigations: A Glimpse at the Legal Background

Case 9:16-cr RLR Document 92 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/03/2017 Page 1 of 6

UNITED STATES FOREIGN INTELLIGENCE SURVEILLANCE COURT Washington, D.C. RULES OF PROCEDURE Effective November 1, 2010

Cell Site Simulator Privacy Model Bill

Case M:06-cv VRW Document Filed 07/21/2007 Page 1 of 5

SECRET/fNOFOR.."'f UNITED STATES FOREIGN INTELLIGENCE SURVEILLANCE COURT WASHINGTON, D.C. BRIEF OF AMICUS CURL.\E

Re: The European Commission s Annual Review of the E.U. U.S. Privacy Shield

CRIMINAL, TRAFFIC, CIVIL AND SMALL CLAIM RULES

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF ALAMEDA

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

Technical Standards and Safety Authority. Rules of Practice

Procedural Order No. 3

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA IN RE: KATRINA CANAL BREACHES CONSOLIDATED LITIGATION NO.

CIRCUIT COURT PROCEDURES FOR CIVIL ACTIONS

UNITED STATES FOREIGN INTELLIGENCE SURVEILLANCE COURT WASHINGTON, D.C.

FINAL WORKING DOCUMENT

Case 1:06-cv RBW Document 20 Filed 06/30/2008 Page 1 of 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

United States District Court

PRIVACY, TECHNOLOGY AND NATIONAL SECURITY: An Overview of Intelligence Collection by Robert S. Litt, ODNI General Counsel

PROPOSAL SUBMISSION AGREEMENT

Overview of Constitutional Challenges to NSA Collection Activities

RULE 13.1 Filing and service electronic-transmission filings

Implementing Regulations of the Trademark Law of the People's Republic of China

Case 3:07-cv SI Document Filed 11/26/2007 Page 1 of 7

2016 No. 41 POLICE. The Police (Conduct) Regulations (Northern Ireland) 2016

RULE 17 FACSIMILE FILING APPLICABILITY These rules apply to civil and criminal proceedings in the Court of Common Pleas, Clermont County, Ohio.

ADR INSTITUTE OF CANADA, INC. ADRIC ARBITRATION RULES I. MODEL DISPUTE RESOLUTION CLAUSE

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

RULES OF THE TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF INTELLECTUAL AND DEVELOPMENTAL DISABILITIES OFFICE OF GENERAL COUNSEL

HARVARD PILGRIM HEALTH CARE, INC. PRIVACY AND SECURITY AGREEMENT

Allegation of Perjury by Police officer in judicial review proceedings brought by Kim Dotcom

Case M:06-cv VRW Document 345 Filed 08/08/2007 Page 1 of 5

Chapter 36 Mediation and Arbitration 2015 EDITION

WIRELESS INNOVATION FORUM INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS POLICY. As approved on 10 November, 2016

DATE. Handle Via. COMit\JT. Cha.nneis. Access to this document will be restricted to those approved for the following specific activities:

Transcription:

UNITED STATES FOREIGN INTELLIGENCE SURVEILLANCE COURT WASHINGTON, D.C. IN RE APPLICATION OF THE FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION FOR AN ORDER REQUIRING THE PRODUCTION OF TANGIBLE THINGS FROM DOCKET NO. BR 09-06 L ORDER TOP SECRET//COMINT//NOFORN

On May 29, 2009, this Court issued a Supplemental Order that addressed several issues. Among other things, the May 29 Supplemental Order noted the government's recent disclosure that the unminimized results of authorized queries o metadata collected by the National Security Agency (NSA) pursuant to the Court's order in and prior FISC orders had been shared with NSA analysts other than the limited number of analysts authorized to access such metadata. May 29 Supplemental Order at 1-2. Such sharing had not previously been disclosed to the Court. Id. at 2. The May 29 Supplemental Order also noted the government's disclosure of an inaccuracy regarding the number of., reports described in paragraph 14 of the declaration attached as Exhibit A to the application in The Court directed the government to submit, within 20 days, a declaration correcting the inaccuracy regarding the number of reports and to provide a complete and "updated description ofnsa's dissemination practices." May 29 Supplemental Order at 3-4. TOP SECRET//COMINT//NOFORN Page2

On June 18, 2009, the United States submitted the Govemment's Response to the Courfs Supplemental Order Entered on May 29, 2009, TOP SECRET//COMINT//NOFORN Page 3

Unfortunately, the government's responses to the Court's May 29 Supplemental Order also raise two additional compliance issues, but also its orders in the bulk business records collection, which was last renewed by the Court in Docket No. BR 09-06. TOP SECRET//COMINT//NOFORN Page4

Second, the government referred in its June 18 submissions to a dissemination-related problem that was first brought to the Court's attention in a "preliminary notice of compliance incident filed. with the Court on June 16, 2009." June 18 L Declaration at 3 n.1. In the June 16 notice- and in a separate notice filed contemporaneously in Docket No. BR 09-06 -the government informed the Court that the unminimized results of some queries of metadata had been "uploaded [by NSA] into a database to which other intelligence agencies... had access." Preliminary Notice of Compliance Incident filed June 16, 2009, in Docket No. BR 09-06 at 2. Providing such access, the government explained, may have resulted in the dissemination of U.S. person information in violation ofussid 18 and the more restrictive restrictions on dissemination proposed by the government and adopted by the Court in its current and prior orders in both of the above-captioned matters. TOP SECRET//COMINT//NOFORN Page 5

; Preliminary Notice of Compliance Incident filed June 16, 2009, in Docket No. BR 09-06 at 2 The govermnent asserts that NSA terminated access by outside agencies to the database at issue on June 12, 2009, and that it is still investigating the matter. Preliminary Notice of Compliance Incident filed June 16, 2009, in Docket No. BR 09-06 at 2; The Court is also seriously concerned regarding NSA's placement of TOP SECRET//COMINT//NOFORN Page6

unminimized metadata into databases accessible by outside agencies, which, as the government has acknowledged, violates not only the Court's orders, but also NSA's minimization and dissemination procedures set forth in USSID 18. Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that: 1. - 2. With regard to BR 09-06, the government shall, by 5:00 p:m. each Friday, commencing on July 3, 2009, 2 file with the Court a report listing each instance during the seven-day period ending the previous Friday in which NSA has shared, in any form,' information obtained or derived from the-br metadata collections with anyone outside NSA. For each such instance, the government shall specify the date on which the information was shared, the recipient of the information, and the form in which the information was communicated(~. written report, email, oral communication, etc.). For each such instance in which U.S. person information has been shared, the Chief oflnformation Sharing ofnsa's Signals Intelligence Directorate shall certify that such official determined, prior to dissemination, the information to be related to counterterrorism information and necessary to understand the counterten orism information or to assess its importance; 3. With regard to BR 09-06, the government shall 2 If Friday is a holiday, the report shall be submitted on the next business day. TOP SECRET//COMINT//NOFORN Page?

include, in its submissions regarding the results of the end-to-end reviews, a full explanation of why the government has permitted the dissemination outside NSA of U.S. person infmmation without regard to whether such dissemination complied with the clear and acknowledged requirements for sharing U.S. person information derived from the metadata collected pursuant to the Court's orders.!tis SO ORDERED this))"t{iay of June, 2009,>-,. /. //...;r/ 7,,,, ~a~ B. WALTON Judge, United States Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court TOP SECRET//COMINT//NOFORN Page 8

-3-