Math 13 Liberal Arts Math HW7 Chapter Give an example of a weighted voting system that has a dummy voter but no dictator that is not [6:5,3,1].

Similar documents
ENGLISH LANGUAGE. Call to know about our Pendrive/Tablet & Android Courses. For more visit, ENGLISH LANGUAGE 1

Chapter 11. Weighted Voting Systems. For All Practical Purposes: Effective Teaching

12.3 Weighted Voting Systems

Check off these skills when you feel that you have mastered them. Identify if a dictator exists in a given weighted voting system.

This situation where each voter is not equal in the number of votes they control is called:

The Mathematics of Power: Weighted Voting

(c) 2013 Janice L. Epstein Voting Methods 1

This situation where each voter is not equal in the number of votes they control is called:

How to Manipulate Staff Decisions using Voting:

Association Française pour le Nommage Internet en Coopération. Election methods.

The Spending Power and the Federalist Revival

Single-winner Voting Method Comparison Chart

On Axiomatization of Power Index of Veto

Warm-up Day 3 Given these preference schedules, identify the Plurality, Borda, Runoff, Sequential Runoff, and Condorcet winners.

Lecture 7 A Special Class of TU games: Voting Games

Four Condorcet-Hare Hybrid Methods for Single-Winner Elections

The Math of Rational Choice - Math 100 Spring 2015

Warm-up Day 3. Phones OFF and in pockets! 1) Given these preference schedules, identify the Condorcet, Runoff, and Sequential Runoff winners.

Shapley-Shubik Power

Name Date I. Consider the preference schedule in an election with 5 candidates.

Voting and Apportionment(Due with Final Exam)

Weighted Voting. Lecture 12 Section 2.1. Robb T. Koether. Hampden-Sydney College. Fri, Sep 15, 2017

Is Democracy Possible?

Weighted Voting. Lecture 13 Section 2.1. Robb T. Koether. Hampden-Sydney College. Mon, Feb 12, 2018

Power in Voting Games and Canadian Politics

The Impact of Turkey s Membership on EU Voting. Richard Baldwin and Mika Widgrén. Abstract

2 The Mathematics of Power. 2.1 An Introduction to Weighted Voting 2.2 The Banzhaf Power Index. Topic 2 // Lesson 02

Turkey: Economic Reform and Accession to the European Union

SECTION I. 1. Coat : Rind 2. Laugh : Bell 3. Rain : Reign 4. Brain : Cranium

Kybernetika. František Turnovec Fair majorities in proportional voting. Terms of use: Persistent URL:

A Geometric and Combinatorial Interpretation of Weighted Games

Social welfare functions

An Overview on Power Indices

Lecture 8 A Special Class of TU games: Voting Games

Section I 1. BACD 2. DACB 3. CADB 4. DCBA

CAT 1994 Actual Paper

In this lecture, we will explore weighted voting systems further. Examples of shortcuts to determining winning coalitions and critical players.

A priori veto power of the president of Poland Jacek W. Mercik 12

653 NIACL AO Direction: In the questions you are required to do as directed. [A] [B] Rearrange the following into a coherent paragraph.

Write all responses on separate paper. Use complete sentences, charts and diagrams, as appropriate.

The portfolio allocation paradox: An investigation into the nature of a very strong but puzzling relationship

MULTIPLE CHOICE. Choose the one alternative that best completes the statement or answers the question.

Introduction to Computational Social Choice. Yann Chevaleyre. LAMSADE, Université Paris-Dauphine

Kybernetika. Robert Bystrický Different approaches to weighted voting systems based on preferential positions

CAT 1995 Actual Paper

Fairness Criteria. Review: Election Methods

Voting power in the Electoral College: The noncompetitive states count, too

MATH 1340 Mathematics & Politics

Homework 4 solutions

EU Rural Development policies

Connecting Voting Theory and Graph Theory

Voting rules: (Dixit and Skeath, ch 14) Recall parkland provision decision:

The Integer Arithmetic of Legislative Dynamics

Keywords and Phrases: Sen s Theorem, externalities, paradoxes, Prisoner s Dilemma, game theory

Decision Making in Europe: Were Spain and Poland Right to Stop the Constitution in December 2003? 1

Motive and Conflict in the Disaster Recovery Process of Housing Reconstruction in Sri Lanka after the 2004 Indian Ocean Tsunami

MBA SAMPLE TEST 2018


Annexations and alliances : when are blocs advantageous a priori? Dan S. Felsenthal and Moshé Machover

University of Utah Western Political Science Association

The mathematics of voting, power, and sharing Part 1

NOTES. Power Distribution in Four-Player Weighted Voting Systems

Satisfaction Approval Voting

Two-dimensional voting bodies: The case of European Parliament

The distribution of power in the Council of the European Union

Two-Tier Voting: Solving the Inverse Power Problem and Measuring Inequality

A Mathematical View on Voting and Power

Seminar on Applications of Mathematics: Voting. EDB Hong Kong Science Museum,

n(n 1) 2 C = total population total number of seats amount of increase original amount

1 von :46

Public Choice : (c) Single Peaked Preferences and the Median Voter Theorem

Practice TEST: Chapter 14

Capgemini new set of written test questions with answers

In deciding upon a winner, there is always one main goal: to reflect the preferences of the people in the most fair way possible.

An empirical comparison of the performance of classical power indices. Dennis Leech

SHAPLEY VALUE 1. Sergiu Hart 2

MATH 1340 Mathematics & Politics

Lecture # 3 Economics of European Integration

Social choice theory

Sanoussi Bilal Madeleine O. Hosli. Connected Coalition Formation and Voting Power in the Council of the European Union: An Endogenous Policy Approach

Voting Methods

Total 90 questions, 90 minutes ---SECTIONAL CUTOFF IS THERE

INTERNATIONAL ORGANISATION ANALYSED WITH THE POWER INDEX METHOD

Introduction to Social Choice

Voting and Apportionment(Due by Nov. 25)

Math for Liberal Studies

How many political parties are there, really? A new measure of the ideologically cognizable number of parties/party groupings

Thema Working Paper n Université de Cergy Pontoise, France

Year At a Glance U.S. History C.P. High School U.S. HISTORY-THE

Coalitional Game Theory

POWER VOTING. Degree Thesis BY NIKÉ S. PANTA. BSc Mathematics Mathematical Analyst Specialisation. Supervisor:

The search for a perfect voting system. MATH 105: Contemporary Mathematics. University of Louisville. October 31, 2017

Voting. Hannu Nurmi. Game Theory and Models of Voting. Public Choice Research Centre and Department of Political Science University of Turku

University of Toronto Department of Economics. Party formation in single-issue politics [revised]

Annick Laruelle and Federico Valenciano: Voting and collective decision-making

In deciding upon a winner, there is always one main goal: to reflect the preferences of the people in the most fair way possible.

On the Weights of Nations: Assigning Voting Weights in a Heterogeneous Union Salvador Barberà and Matthew O. Jackson

1. His early films show a precocious mastery of the moving image. (1) substantial (2) lacklustre (3) slow (4) measured

MATH 1340 Mathematics & Politics

Math for Liberal Studies

Transcription:

Math 13 Liberal Arts Math HW7 Chapter 11 1. Give an example of a weighted voting system that has a dummy voter but no dictator that is not [6:5,3,1]. 2. Explain why the weighted voting system [13: 10, 6, 5, 3, 2] is not a legitimate weighted voting system. 3. Give an example of a weighted voting system that has a blocking coalition that would not be a winning coalition if all its members voted YES. 4. Given the weighted voting system [30: 20, 17, 10, 5], list all winning coalitions. 5. Given the weighted voting system [51: 45, 43, 7, 5], a. list all blocking coalitions. b. list all minimal winning coalitions 6. Given the weighted voting system [30: 20, 17, 10, 5], a. list all minimal winning coalitions. 7. A weighted voting system has four voters, A, B, C, and D. List all possible coalitions of these voters. How many such coalitions are there? 8. In a weighted voting system, is a voter with veto power the same as a dictator? Why or why not? 9. A weighted voting system has 12 members. How many distinct coalitions are there in which exactly seven members vote YES? 10. Given the weighted voting system [5: 3, 2, 1, 1, 1], find which voters of the coalition {A, C, D, E} are critical? 11. Given the weighted voting system [8: 5, 4, 3], find the Banzhaf power index for each voter. 12. Given the weighted voting system [14: 10, 6, 5, 3], find the Banzhaf power index for each voter. 13. Given the weighted voting system [7: 4, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1], find the Banzhaf power index for each voter. 14. Give an example of a weighted voting system that is equivalent to the [15: 8, 7, 6]. 15. What is the difference between a "critical" voter in a coalition and a "pivotal" voter in a permutation? 16. Calculate the Shapely-Shubik power index for the weighted voting system a. [30: 20, 17, 10, 5]. b. [8: 6, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1]. 17. There are five distinct three-member voting systems. Give an example of each. 18. Given the weighted voting system [4: 1, 2, 3], a. list all winning coalitions. 19. Given the weighted voting system [16: 3, 9, 4, 5, 10], calculate the Banzhaf power index for each voter. 20. Given the weighted voting system [14: 8, 2, 5, 7, 4], calculate the Shapley-Shubik power index for each voter.

Math 13 Liberal Arts Math HW7 Solutions Chapter 11\ 1. Give an example of a weighted voting system that has a dummy voter but no dictator that is not [6:5,3,1]. SOLN: One solution is [9: 6, 5, 2], or [100: 98, 2, 1] 2. Explain why the weighted voting system [13: 10, 6, 5, 3, 2] is not a legitimate weighted voting system. SOLN: The system given is not a legitimate weighted voting system because the quota is exactly half of the total vote weight. Two different complementary coalitions exist with vote weight total of 13, (A, D) and (B, C, E). 3. Give an example of a weighted voting system that has a blocking coalition that would not be a winning coalition if all its members voted YES. SOLN. One solution is: In the [14: 10, 6, 5, 3, 2], the coalition (A, D) is a blocking coalition because (B, C, E) has only 13 votes. (A, D) would not be a winning coalition by voting "yes" because (A, D) has only 13 votes. 4. Given the weighted voting system [30: 20, 17, 10, 5], list all winning coalitions. SOLN: (A, D) (A, C) (B, C, D) (A, B, C) (A, B, D) (A, C, D) (A, B, C, D). 5. Given the weighted voting system [51: 45, 43, 7, 5], a. list all blocking coalitions. SOLN: (A, B) (A, C) (A, B, C) (A, B, D) (A, C, D) (A, D) (B, C) (B, C, D) (A, B, C, D) b. list all minimal winning coalitions SOLN: (A, B) (A, C) (B, C, D) 6. Given the weighted voting system [30: 20, 17, 10, 5], a. list all minimal winning coalitions. SOLN: (A, B) (A, C) (B, C, D) SOLN: (A, B) (A, C) (A, B, C) (A, B, D) (A, C, D) (B, C, D) (A, B, C, D) (A, D) (B, C) 7. A weighted voting system has four voters, A, B, C, and D. List all possible coalitions of these voters. How many such coalitions are there? SOLN: There are 16 coalitions possible from four voters: Ø, (A) (B) (C) (D) (A, B) (A, C) (A, D) (B, C) (B, D) (C, D) (A, B, C) (A, B, D) (A, C, D) (B, C, D) (A, B, C, D) 8. In a weighted voting system, is a voter with veto power the same as a dictator? Why or why not? SOLN: NO: A voter with veto power has enough votes to block any measure, but not necessarily enough to pass any issue. A dictator has enough votes to pass any issue on his or her own 9. A weighted voting system has 12 members. How many distinct coalitions are there in which exactly seven members vote YES? 12 12! 12 11 10 9 8 11 9 8 792 7! 5! 5 4 3 2 10. Given the weighted voting system [5: 3, 2, 1, 1, 1], find which voters of the coalition {A, C, D, E} are critical?

SOLN: Since the coalition {A, C, D, E} has one extra vote, the only critical member is voter A with weight 3. 11. Given the weighted voting system [8: 5, 4, 3], find the Banzhaf power index for each voter. SOLN: There are 6 permutations of the voters: ABC, ACB, BAC, BCA, CAB, CBA. A is pivotal in BAC, BCA, CAB and CBA while B is pivotal in ABC and C is pivotal in ACB, so the SSPI is,,. But we re asked for the Banzhaf Power Index For that we make a listing of all possible voting coalitions, of which there are 2 3 = 8. As the table below indicates, the BPI is 6,2,2. A B C Critical 1 1 1 A 1 1 0 AB 1 0 1 AC 0 1 1 A 1 0 0 BC 0 1 0 A 0 0 1 A 0 0 0 12. Given the weighted voting system [14: 10, 6, 5, 3], find the Banzhaf power index for each voter. SOLN: Now there are 24 = 16 coalitions (with the critical voters as tabulated below) so the BPI is 10,6,6,2. A B C D Critical A B C D Critical 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 0 A D 1 1 1 0 A 0 1 0 1 A C 1 1 0 1 AB 0 0 1 1 AB 1 0 1 1 A C 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 1 BCD 0 0 1 0 A 1 1 0 0 AB 0 1 0 0 A 1 0 1 0 A C 1 0 0 0 BC 1 0 0 1 BC 0 0 0 0 13. Given the weighted voting system [7: 4, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1], find the Banzhaf power index for each voter. SOLN: Now there are 26 = 64 different coalitions, but rather than list them all, we not that there are 5 3 10 ways a group of weight-1 voters can be a critical part of a blocking coalition and 5 3 10 ways a pair of weight-1 voters can be a critical part of a winning coalition, so each of the weight- 1 voters has BPI of 20. Also, voter A is critical in the winning coalitions 3, 4, or 5 weight-1 voters, of which there are 10+5+1=16 and critical in the blocking coalitions involving 0, 1, or 2 weight-1 voters, of which there are 1+5+10=16. Thus the BPI is 32,20,20,20,20,20. 14. Give an example of a weighted voting system that is equivalent to the [15: 8, 7, 6]. SOLN: There are many good solutions here. One solution is: [32: 20, 15, 10].

15. What is the difference between a "critical" voter in a coalition and a "pivotal" voter in a permutation? SOLN: A critical voter in a winning or blocking coalition is any voter who has sufficient weight so that the coalition would no longer be winning or blocking were this voter to switch their vote. The order of voters in the coalition does not matter. There can be more than one critical voter in a coalition. A pivotal voter is the first voter who joins a coalition and gives that coalition enough votes to win. Each permutation has exactly one pivotal voter. 16. Calculate the Shapely-Shubik power index for the weighted voting system a. [30: 20, 17, 10, 5]. SOLN: There are 4! = 24 permutations, so it s not too hard to list them all (see below.) Tallying up we see the SSPI is,,, ABCD ADBC BCAD CABD CDAB DBAC ABDC ADCB BCDA CADB CDBA DBCA ACBD BACD BDAC CBAD DABC DCAB ACDB BADC BDCA CBDA DACB DCBA b. [8: 6, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1]. SOLN: Here there will be 6! = 720 permutations, but we can categorize them as (1) permutations in which 6 goes first or second, in each case there are 4! = 24 ways to rearrange the weight-1 voters around a particular pivotal weight-1 voter, so each weight-1 voter is pivotal in 48 different permutations. Since this is true for each of the 5 weight-1 voters, there are 240 permutations in which A is not pivotal. A is thus pivotal in 720 240 = 480 permutations. Thus the SSPI is,,,,, 17. There are five distinct three-member voting systems. Give an example of each. Answers may vary. One example of each of the five distinct voting systems is: [3: 3, 1, 1] dictator [4: 2, 2, 1] two with veto power [2: 1, 1, 1] each voter is equal, majority rules [3: 2, 1, 1] one with veto power [3: 1, 1, 1] unanimous vote required 18. Given the weighted voting system [4: 1, 2, 3], a. list all winning coalitions. SOLN: {A, C}, {B, C}, {A, B, C} SOLN: {C}, {A, B}, {A, C}, {B, C}, {A, B, C} 19. Given the weighted voting system [16: 3, 9, 4, 5, 10], calculate the Banzhaf power index for each voter. SOLN: (4, 8, 4, 4, 8) There are 25 = 32 coalitions (itemized with critical voters below.) So the BPI is 8,16,8,8,16. coalition CV CV CV CV 11111 10110 B E 11000 CDE 00101 AB D 11110 B 01110 BCD 10100 B E 00011 ABC

11101 11001 B E 10010 B E 10000 11011 10101 A C E 10001 BCD 01000 E 10111 E 01101 B E 01100 A DE 00100 01111 10011 A DE 01010 A C E 00010 11100 ABC 01011 B E 01001 B E 00001 B 11010 AB D 00111 CDE 00110 B E 00000 20. Given the weighted voting system [14: 8, 2, 5, 7, 4], calculate the Shapley-Shubik power index for each voter. SOLN: Here there are 5! = 120 permutations. Yikes. Here it goes!,,, ABCDE ADCBE BACDE BDCAE CBADE CDABE DBCAE DACBE EBCDA EDCBA ABCED ADCEB BACED BDCEA CBAED CDAEB DBCEA DACEB EBCAD EDCAB ABDCE ADBCE BADCE BDACE CBDAE CDBAE DBACE DABCE EBDCA EDBCA ABDEC ADBEC BADEC BDAEC CBDEA CDBEA DBAEC DABEC EBDAC EDBAC ABEDC ADEBC BAEDC BDEAC CBEDA CDEBA DBEAC DAEBC EBADC EDABC ABECD ADECB BAECD BDECA CBEAD CDEAB DBECA DAECB EBACD EDACB ACBDE AECDB BCADE BECDA CABDE CEADB DCBAE DECAB ECBDA EACDB ACBED AECBD BCAED BECAD CABED CEABD DCBEA DECBA ECBAD EACBD ACDBE AEDCB BCDAE BEDCA CADBE CEDAB DCABE DEACB ECDBA EADCB ACDEB AEDBC BCDEA BEDAC CADEB CEDBA DCAEB DEABC ECDAB EADBC ACEDB AEBDC BCEDA BEADC CAEDB CEBDA DCEAB DEBAC ECADB EABDC ACEBD AEBCD BCEAD BEACD CAEBD CEBAD DCEBA DEBCA ECABD EABCD 02244 02280 30252 70410 32052 52032 52302 90300 70140 32520 That was awful!