Appellee Strategies in the Federal Courts of Appeal Leveraging Appellate Waivers, Cross Appeals, and Other Proactive Tactics in Civil Appeals

Similar documents
If at all possible, it is strongly recommended that you get advice from a lawyer to help you with this application.

Activities: Teacher lecture (background information and lecture outline provided); class participation activity.

Logging in. Once logged in, go to the My AAMVA link in the top right of the screen.

DATA REQUEST GUIDELINES

Supporting Documentation Requirements for Renewal of Pa.C.P. Credential

FD/FOC4037 USE THIS MISCELLANEOUS MOTION PACKET FOR

Nova Scotia Nominee Program NSNP Demand 200 Employer Information

Ch nook Aboriginal Management Certificate Program (AMP) 2015 Application Form

OXON CHURCH OF ENGLAND PRIMARY SCHOOL COMPLAINTS POLICY

Measuring Public Opinion

CAMPAIGN REGISTRATION STATEMENT STATE OF WISCONSIN ETHCF-1

- Problems with e-filing, especially for people from lower-income backgrounds. - Receiving memos / communication from one side and not the other

Common Evidentiary Predicates to Authenticate Evidence

IMMIGRATION Canada. Temporary Resident Visa. Nairobi Visa Office Instructions. Table of Contents. For the following countries:

Guardianship & Conservatorship In Virginia

Role Play Magistrate Court Hearings Teacher information

Nova Scotia Nominee Program NSNP 200 Employer Information

CONTEMPT. This packet contains forms and information on: How to File a Petition for Citation of Contempt

IMMIGRATION Canada. Temporary Resident Visa. Pretoria Visa Office Instructions. Table of Contents. For the following countries:

LEGAL BRIEF SMALL CLAIMS COURT JANUARY 2016

HOW TO CHANGE YOUR NAME (for an Adult)

ACI-NA Commercial Management Committee Participation Plan Last Updated: September 2018

3. Recruit at least one other person to help you with registration and other tasks on Caucus night.

CJS 220. The Court System. Version 2 08/06/07 CJS 220

Most Frequently Asked Questions

GENERAL ORDER PORT WASHINGTON POLICE DEPARTMENT

The Genuine Temporary Entrant (GTE) Requirement (Recommendations 1 and 2)

INSTRUCTIONS FOR VACATING MISDEMEANOR AND GROSS MISDEMEANOR CONVICTIONS

DEPUTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY I $5,461 - $7,410/Month

INSTRUCTIONS FOR FILING A COMPLAINT FOR DIVORCE WITHOUT MINOR CHILDREN

CAPIC Submission on Part 16: Immigration and Refugee Protection Regulations (IRPR)

Loyola University Chicago School of Law Application for Certificate in Advocacy for J.D. Students

1. Humanities-oriented academic essays are typically both analytical and argumentative.

FLORIDA S DEPENDENCY BENCHBOOK BENCHCARD: PSYCHOTROPIC MEDICATION HEARING

Video Course Evaluation Form. Atty ID number for Pennsylvania: Name of Course You Just Watched

THE NEW YORK BAR FOUNDATION

MICHIGAN CONTRACTS & SALES DISTINCTIONS PROFESSOR ANNE LAWTON MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY COLLEGE OF LAW

CBA Response to Private Prosecuting Association Consultation entitled. Private Prosecutions Consultation. 6 th March 2019

personal data means any information relating to an identified or identifiable natural person;

Northern Source, LLC v Kousouros 2012 NY Slip Op 33203(U) February 22, 2012 Sup Ct, NY County Docket Number: /2008E Judge: Paul G.

Eyewitness Identification. Professor Nancy K. Steblay Augsburg College Minneapolis

FDP MEETING REPORT/SUMMARY. Session Info. Activities/Outcomes/ The newly established steering committee was formulated and has been Progress to Date

COURT FACILITY EQUAL ACCESS POLICY

Multi-Agency Guidance (Non Police)

Loss of Right Provisions

Country Profile: Brazil

Findings from the Federal, State, and Tribal Response to Violence Against Women in Indian Country Studies

CARL Backgrounder on the New Citizenship Act (formerly Bill C-24) INTRODUCTION

PEER INTERVIEW. Conduct a 15-minute face-to-face interview with a colleague

2018 APPLICATION FOR APPOINTMENT TO NEW ALBANY CITY COUNCIL

Supervised Legal Practice Guidelines (Legal Profession Act 2008)

HIGH COMMISSION OF INDIA

Child migration (subclass 101, 102, 445 and 117)

Attending the Coroner s Court as a witness and how to give evidence

REGISTERED STUDENT ORGANIZATION LEADERSHIP TEAM Drafted on: April 25, 2013

due date: Monday, August 31 (first day of school) estimated time: 3 hours (for planning purposes only; work until you finish)

7.0 Eagle/Cloverdale Alignment

! EQUITY! LAWS%2015%!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! 1!

ORGANIZING A LEGAL DISCUSSION (IRAC, CRAC, ETC.)

WITH RECENT CHANGES ISSUED BY THE CFPB, FINAL REMITTANCE TRANSFER REGULATIONS TO BECOME EFFECTIVE FEBRUARY 7, 2013

REQUEST TO ARBITRATE

The Waddell Weekly Bulletin

HOW TO EXPUNGE AND/OR SEAL A CRIMINAL RECORD

Candidate Information Packet

NYS Common Core ELA & Literacy Curriculum D R A F T Grade 12 Module 2 Unit 1 Lesson 7

Printed copies are for reference only. Please refer to the electronic copy in Scouts.ca for the latest version.

US ESTA Application Form

Recording Secretary Participant Workbook Facilitators: Colin Treanor (UConn 2014) Jake Lueck (Kansas 2017)

Steps to Organize a CNU Chapter Congress for the New Urbanism

LM18 - Criminal Convictions Window

Deferred Action for Parental Accountability (DAPA) Frequently Asked Questions December 4, 2014

Getting in Front on Data Quality

PRE-ELECTION NATIONAL SURVEY KEY FINDINGS, INDONESIA

Indigenous Consultation in Environmental Assessment Processes

Summary: October 2, 2018

Service Request Manual

COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION. Brussels, 12 July 2000 (28.07) (OR. fr) 10242/00 LIMITE ASILE 30

Application for Authorisation

Unit #2: American Political Ideologies and Beliefs AP US Government & Politics Mr. Coia

Forms Packet Copyright 2013

OFFICIAL MEETING MINUTES OF THE PALM BEACH COUNTY COMMISSION ON ETHICS PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA NOVEMBER 1, 2018

DLCD ACKNOWLEDGMENT or DEADLINE TO APPEAL: Thursday, March 26, 2009

Going Up? Don t Forget To Take Your Issues: The Preservation Rule

19 th Judicial Circuit Court Appointed Attorney Application and Preference Form

Refugee Council response to the 21 st Century Welfare consultation

West Tankers applies, so the Commercial Court points to other options in Nori Holdings Ltd v Bank Otkritie [2018] EWHC 1343 (Comm)

Alternative Measures for Adult Offenders ALT 1. March 1, 2018 CHA 1 CHI 1 CRI 1 FIR 1 HAT 1 IPV 1 SEX 1

February 6, Interview with WILLIAM J. BAROODY,.JR. William A. Syers Political Scientist and Deputy Director House Republican Policy Committee

Superlative. * rhinoceros. * Kyushu. * Hokkaido. * hippopotamus. * elephant. * Honshu. * Vatican City. * Shinjuku, Tokyo. * Taipei, Taiwan.

AP US Government Chapter 12

CALIFORNIA EVIDENCE ESSAY WORKSHOP PROFESSOR CHRISTOPHER IDE-DON UC DAVIS SCHOOL OF LAW

... s. planner to 2017

Social Media and the First Amendment

EDS Renewals User Guide

The America Invents Act- What You Need To Know

Mock Trial Competition Manual 2018

Adjourning Licensing Hearings

MHA or MCA a more flexible approach?

Family Law Legal Service Providers: Consultation Paper

Protecting Access to Reproductive Health Care and Abortion As An Electoral Priority

Transcription:

Presenting a live 90 minute webinar with interactive Q&A Appellee Strategies in the Federal Curts f Appeal Leveraging Appellate Waivers, Crss Appeals, and Other Practive Tactics in Civil Appeals TUESDAY, JULY 23, 2013 1pm Eastern 12pm Central 11am Muntain 10am Pacific Td Tday s faculty features: Anne M. Jhnsn, Partner, Haynes and Bne, Dallas Andrew Tuck, Senir Assciate, Alstn & Bird, Atlanta Kyle G.A. Wallace, Partner, Alstn & Bird, Atlanta The audi prtin f the cnference may be accessed via the telephne r by using yur cmputer's speakers. Please refer t the instructins emailed t registrants fr additinal infrmatin. If yu have any questins, please cntact Custmer Service at 1-800-926-7926 ext. 10.

Tips fr Optimal Quality Sund Quality If yu are listening via yur cmputer speakers, please nte that the quality f yur sund will vary depending n the speed and quality f yur internet cnnectin. If the sund quality is nt satisfactry and yu are listening via yur cmputer speakers, yu may listen via the phne: dial 1-866-869-6667 and enter yur PIN when prmpted. Otherwise, please send us a chat r e-mail sund@straffrdpub.cm immediately s we can address the prblem. If yu dialed in and have any difficulties during the call, press *0 fr assistance. Viewing Quality T maximize yur screen, press the F11 key n yur keybard. T exit full screen, press the F11 key again.

Cntinuing Educatin Credits FOR LIVE EVENT ONLY Fr CLE purpses, please let us knw hw many peple are listening at yur lcatin by cmpleting each f the fllwing steps: In the chat bx, type (1) yur cmpany name and (2) the number f attendees at yur lcatin Click the SEND buttn beside the bx If yu have purchased Straffrd CLE prcessing services, yu must cnfirm yur participatin by cmpleting and submitting an Official Recrd f Attendance (CLE Frm). Yu may btain yur CLE frm by ging t the prgram page and selecting the apprpriate frm in the PROGRAM MATERIALS bx at the tp right crner. If yu'd like t purchase CLE credit prcessing, it is available fr a fee. Fr additinal infrmatin abut CLE credit prcessing, g t ur website r call us at 1-800-926-7926 ext. 35.

Prgram Materials If yu have nt printed the cnference materials fr this prgram, please cmplete the fllwing steps: Click n the + sign next t Cnference Materials in the middle f the left- hand clumn n yur screen. Click n the tab labeled Handuts that appears, and there yu will see a PDF f the slides fr tday's prgram. Duble click n the PDF and a separate page will pen. Print the slides by clicking n the printer icn.

APPELLEE STRATEGIES IN THE FEDERAL COURTS OF APPEAL Anne M. Jhnsn Haynes and Bne, LLP Dallas, TX anne.jhnsn@haynesbne.cm Andy Tuck Alstn & Bird, LLP Atlanta, GA andy.tuck@alstn.cm Kyle G.A. Wallace Alstn & Bird, LLP Atlanta, GA kyle.wallace@alstn.cm July 23, 2013

Reversal Rates (2012) Circuit Percentage f Civil Cases Civil Reversal Decided n Merits Rate All 57.3% 11.4% DC 68.8% 12.1% First 59.1% 10.2% Secnd 52.7% 6.4% Third 61.5% 11.3% Furth 70.7% 6.2% Fifth 61.5% 14.7% Sixth 57.0% 13.5% Seventh 54.2% 14.6% Eighth 73.2% 8.9% Ninth 54.8% 14.8% Tenth 59.3% 66% 6.6% 11th 45.5% 12.6% 6

Fur Pillars f Affirmance Preservatin f Errr Standards f Review Harmless Errr Stare Decisis 7

Snatching Defeat Frm the Jaws f Victry Rely slely l n fur pillars f affirmance. Stick t the issues framed by Appellant and take a purely defensive psture. Ignre the right fr any reasn rule, and fail t ffer alternate ways t the same result. Miss the pprtunity t file a crss appeal. 8

Standard Appellee Strategy Receive Appellant s Brief Outline Appellant s Arguments Attack Each Argument 9

Trap fr the Unwary Appellee Right Fr Any Reasn rule an appellee can argue that the decisin belw shuld be affirmed fr any reasn supprted by the recrd But what abut issues n which h the appellee lst? What abut issues the curt belw ignred? 10

Tw Cmpeting Principles Judicial efficiency especially in the summary- judgment cntext, appellate curts rule whether there is an issue f material fact fr trial, and shuld grant summary judgment if there is nt, even if the lwer curt applied incrrect reasning. Appellate Curts Review appellate curts shuld nt be in the business f lking at new issues that have nt already been addressed; they shuld crrect errrs in lwer curt pinins, and nt render judgments n issues fr which there is n ruling. City f Gainesville v. Ddd, 573 S.E.2d 369 (Ga. 2002) splintered 2-2-3 pinin 11

Right Fr Any Reasn If Nt Argued? Appellee Waiver issues nt raised in the respnse brief will, in many curts, nt be reviewed under the right-fr-any-reasn rule Hamiltn v. Suthland Christian Schl, 680 F.3d 1316, 1318-19 (11th Cir. 2012). [a] wman f childbearing age was hired as a teacher at a small Christian schl. Then she gt pregnant, married, and fired in that rder. Then she filed a lawsuit. She lst n summary judgment. Hsanna-Tabr Evangelical Lutheran Church & Schl v. Equal Emplyment Opprtunity Cmmissin, 132 S.Ct. 694, 706 (2012). 12

Federal Circuits Appellee Waiver 7th, 10th and 11th Circuits: i appellee waiver, like in the 11th 4th Circuit Judge Hamiltn has dissented and urged applicatin f an appellee-waiver rule 2d, 4th, 5th and 6th Circuits have refused t apply appellee waiver 13

Nightmare Appellee Waiver Scenari Subsequent appeal Hamiltn v. Suthland Christian Schl ges back t the trial curt, and Hamiltn wins a sizeable jury verdict. What happens in the subsequent appeal? Third, Eighth, District f Clumbia (D.C.), and Federal Circuits have all rejected attempts t argue that a party has waived an argument in a secnd appeal by nt raising it in the first appeal. 14

When is a crss-appeal required? An appellate curt may nt alter a judgment t benefit a nn-appealing party. A crss appeal is necessary and prper nly when the appellee wants the appellate curt t alter the judgment (the bttm line, nt the grunds r reasning) f the district curt. Examples: Seeking t enlarge r reduce damage award Seeking enhanced r punitive damages Seeking r challenging attrneys fees Seeking t enlarge r reduce prejudgment interest 15

When is a crss-appeal imprper? "It is mre than well-settled that a party cannt appeal frm a judgment unless 'aggrieved' by it... Simply stated, a party wh has btained a judgment in his favr,,granting gthe relief sught, is nt aggrieved by it. A crss-appeal filed fr the sle purpse f advancing additinal arguments in supprt f a judgment is 'wrse than unnecessary', because it disrupts the briefing schedule, increases the number (and usually the length) f briefs, and tends t cnfuse the issues... Such arguments shuld, instead, be included d in the appellee's answering brief. In re Sims, 994 F.2d 210, 214 (5th Cir. 1993). 16

Crss-Appeals: Prs Creates jepardy fr the Appellant Implicitly suggests an appellate cmprmise Prvides the appellee an additinal brief May encurage settlement n appeal 17

Crss-Appeals: Cns Puts yu in the awkward psitin f defending the lwer curt n sme pints while attacking it n thers May distract frm the primary fcus f yur appellate brief affirm the lwer curt decisin Cmplicates an appeal that is therwise easy t beat Calls curt s attentin t subtleties r cmplexities that yu wuld prefer nt t highlight May make yur client lk greedy 18

Hypthetical #1 District Ct. grants summary judgment fr Defendant n grund A, and des nt address grunds B r C. Plaintiff appeals, asserting that SJ n grund A was errneusly granted. Shuld Defendant/Appellee raise grunds B and C as alternative grunds fr affirming the SJ? If Defendant/Appellee des nt raise thse grunds, has he waived them? Des Defendant/Appellee need t file a ntice f crss-appeal? 19

Hypthetical #2 District Ct. dismisses Claim A and submits Claim B t jury. Jury returns verdict in favr f Plaintiff n Claim B. Appellant/Defendant t argues that t an errneus jury instructin n Claim B requires a new trial. Appellee/Plaintiff argues that the jury instructins were crrect, but if Claim B is remanded, Claim A shuld als be retried. Was Appellee required t file a ntice f crss-appeal? If Appellee never mentined Claim A n appeal, culd he have raised it n remand? 20

Hypthetical #3 Appellant s statement f facts and issues presented are crrect and cmplete. Appellant s arguments are lgically presented. Shuld appellees always submit their wn versin f the facts and issues presented? Shuld appellees structure their argument t crrespnd directly t appellant s brief? 21

Final Tips fr Appellees Dn t frget yur initial reactins when yu first read the appellant s brief. Dn t rely n yur jury argument. Deal with bad facts. Highlight the lwer curt decisin. Help the curt f appeals write its pinin. 22