UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SACRAMENTO DIVISION

Similar documents
Hells Angels Motorcycle Corporation v. Alexander McQueen Trading Limited et al Doc. 1 Dockets.Justia.com

Case 5:14-cv HE Document 1 Filed 10/20/14 Page 1 of 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA

Case 2:07-cv CM-JPO Document 1 Filed 07/30/2007 Page 1 of 12 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, WESTERN DIVISION. Case No. COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES, RESTITUTION AND INJUNCTIVE RELIEF

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 1 COMPLAINT

Case 8:18-cv Document 1 Filed 08/07/18 Page 1 of 26 Page ID #:1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA CASE NO:

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF UTAH, CENTRAL DIVISION : : : : : : : : : :

Case 1:19-cv PKC Document 1 Filed 01/14/19 Page 1 of 5

Case 2:18-cv JAD-CWH Document 1 Filed 12/21/18 Page 1 of 17

Case 2:17-cv EJF Document 2 Filed 10/02/17 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF UTAH CENTRAL DIVISION

Case 2:12-cv JCM-VCF Document 1 Filed 11/13/12 Page 1 of 10

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI SOUTHERN DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 1:14-cv JMS-MJD Document 1 Filed 01/09/14 Page 1 of 8 PageID #: 1

Case 1:15-cv Document 1 Filed 02/27/15 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS. COMPLAINT and Jury Demand

Case 9:13-cv KLR Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/19/2013 Page 1 of 17 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA. Case No.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION : : : : : : : : : :

Case3:15-cv DMR Document1 Filed09/16/15 Page1 of 11

Case 1:16-cv Document 1 Filed 09/22/16 Page 1 of 6

Case 2:15-cv Document 1 Filed 04/06/15 Page 1 of 14 Page ID #:1

Case 2:12-cv TC Document 2 Filed 12/10/12 Page 1 of 16

Case 1:16-cv GAO Document 1 Filed 07/29/16 Page 1 of 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS COMPLAINT AND JURY DEMAND PARTIES

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Case 2:15-cv Document 1 Filed 09/24/15 Page 1 of 12 Page ID #:1

Case 1:17-cv Document 1 Filed 05/03/17 Page 1 of 5

Case 1:11-cv REB Document 1 Filed 12/15/11 Page 1 of 5

Case 3:17-cv JCH Document 1 Filed 11/13/17 Page 1 of 12 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT. Case No.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA CASE NO. OF THE FEDERAL ANTI-. CYBERSQUATTING CONSUMER v. PROTECTION ACT, 15 U.S.C.

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 11/24/ :27 PM INDEX NO /2015 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 57 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 11/24/2015 EXHIBIT C

Attorneys for Plaintiffs LARRY KING ENTERPRISES, INC. and ORA MEDIA LLC

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Case 3:15-cv AA Document 1 Filed 01/12/15 Page 1 of 17

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA. Civil Action No. 07-CV-571

Case 1:07-cv LTS Document 1 Filed 03/15/2007 Page 1 of 20

THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA WESTERN DIVISION Case No: 5:11-cv ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Courthouse News Service

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA ASHEVILLE DIVISION CIVIL ACTION NO.: 1:16-CV-165 ) ) ) ) ) ) )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA GAINESVILLE DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) COMPLAINT (Jury Trial Demanded)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION

Case: 4:13-cv Doc. #: 1 Filed: 08/01/13 Page: 1 of 15 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI

Case 1:17-cv VEC Document 1 Filed 02/15/17 Page 1 of 6

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA ASHEVILLE DIVISION CIVIL ACTION NO.: 1:16-CV-381 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA CHARLOTTE DIVISION Civil Action No.: 3:17-CV-398.

Plaintiff Privacy Pop, LLC ( Plaintiff ) complains and alleges as follows against Defendant Gimme Gimme, LLC ( Defendant ).

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION COMPLAINT

THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA WESTERN DIVISION Case No: 5:15-cv-590 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 2:10-cv KDE-KWR Document 1 Filed 03/24/10 Page 1 of 16 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION

Case 1:16-cv Document 1 Filed 06/05/16 Page 1 of 7

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION

Case 1:17-cv Document 1 Filed 11/20/17 Page 1 of 5

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SAN ANTONIO DIVISION

Case 2:33-av Document Filed 09/21/12 Page 1 of 33 PageID: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

Case 0:10-cv MJD-FLN Document 1 Filed 04/06/10 Page 1 of 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA. Court File No.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN. v. Civil Action No. COMPLAINT

Case 1:14-cv RWZ Document 1 Filed 05/08/14 Page 1 of 19 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

Case 1:18-cv Document 1 Filed 01/29/18 Page 1 of 14

THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION

GIBSON LOWRY BURRIS LLP

Case: 1:12-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 10/02/12 Page 1 of 5 PageID #:1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA JOHN JOSEPH BENGIS, an individual,

Case 2:13-cv RJS Document 2 Filed 03/06/13 Page 1 of 16

USDC IN/ND case 1:18-cv document 1 filed 04/09/18 page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA FORT WAYNE DIVISION

Case 9:18-cv RLR Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/22/2018 Page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.

Case 2:09-cv LDG-RJJ Document 1 Filed 11/06/2009 Page 1 of 15

Case 2:13-cv KSH-CLW Document 1 Filed 12/30/13 Page 1 of 31 PageID: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

Courthouse News Service

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA WESTERN DIVISION

Case: 3:12-cv WHR Doc #: 1 Filed: 08/01/12 Page: 1 of 8 PAGEID #: 1

Case 3:18-cv HEH Document 1 Filed 05/30/18 Page 1 of 20 PageID# 1

Case: 1:11-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 08/10/11 Page 1 of 19 PageID #:1

Case 5:14-cv Document 1 Filed 11/06/14 Page 1 of 12 Page ID #:1

Case 2:10-cv RAJ Document 1 Filed 08/16/10 Page 1 of 8

Case: 1:18-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 06/08/18 Page 1 of 15 PageID #:1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION

Case 1:17-cv CCC Document 1 Filed 06/08/17 Page 1 of 19

Case 1:18-cv Document 1 Filed 05/22/18 Page 1 of 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS COMPLAINT AND JURY DEMAND

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA. Plaintiff, CIVIL ACTION NO. v.

Case: 4:16-cv DDN Doc. #: 1 Filed: 07/15/16 Page: 1 of 9 PageID #: 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA

Case: 1:13-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 07/09/13 Page 1 of 7 PageID #:1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

COMPLAINT FOR VIOLATIONS OF THE LANHAM ACT AND TRADEMARK INFRINGMENT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS. Plaintiff, Civil Action No.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA

Case 1:15-cv CW Document 2 Filed 01/16/15 Page 1 of 5

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 6:15-cv Document 1 Filed 04/06/15 Page 1 of 5 PageID #: 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA. v. Civil Action No. Defendant. JURY DEMANDED

Case 1:17-cv JCH-JHR Document 17 Filed 03/31/17 Page 1 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF UTAH CENTRAL DIVISION. Case No.: Judge:

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN GREEN BAY DIVISION COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

Case 1:11-cv LPS Document 14 Filed 01/30/12 Page 1 of 7 PageID #: 59 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA CHARLOTTE DIVISION. Civil Action No.

Transcription:

Case :0-cv-0-FCD-DAD Document Filed /0/0 Page of FRITZ CLAPP, ESQ. (Cal. Bar No. ) Pawali Street Kihei, Maui, HI Telephone: () - Facsimile: () - E-mail: <mail@fritzclapp.com> Attorney for Plaintiff HELLS ANGELS MOTORCYCLE CORPORATION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SACRAMENTO DIVISION HELLS ANGELS MOTORCYCLE CORPORATION, a Nevada corporation, v. Plaintiff, MOVIEGOODS, INC., a Delaware corporation, and ACUMEN ENTERTAIN- MENT GROUP, a Nevada corporation, Defendants. CASE NO. COMPLAINT FOR TRADEMARK INFRINGEMENT, DILUTION, AND COPYRIGHT INFRINGEMENT; JURY DEMAND Plaintiff, HELLS ANGELS MOTORCYCLE CORPORATION, by and through its undersigned attorney, complains as follows: JURISDICTION AND VENUE. This action arises under the trademark and copyright laws of the United States, U.S.C. et seq. (Lanham Act) and U.S.C. et seq. This court has federal question jurisdiction pursuant to U.S.C. (a) and U.S.C., (a).. Venue is proper in this District pursuant to U.S.C. (b) because the Defendants conduct business within this District. COMPLAINT FOR TRADEMARK INFRINGEMENT, DILUTION, Page

Case :0-cv-0-FCD-DAD Document Filed /0/0 Page of PARTIES. Plaintiff HELLS ANGELS MOTORCYCLE CORPORATION ( HAMC ) is now, and at all relevant times was, a non-profit corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of Nevada. Plaintiff HAMC is the owner of the trademarks and copyrights described herein.. Defendant MOVIEGOODS, INC. ( MOVIEGOODS ) is now, and at all times mentioned was, a Delaware corporation with offices at 0 Paradise Road, Las Vegas, NV. Defendant MOVIEGOODS acquires, manufactures, distributes and sells movie posters, poster reproductions and related items.. Defendant ACUMEN ENTERTAINMENT GROUP ( ACUMEN ) is now, and at all times mentioned was, a Nevada corporation with offices at 0 Paradise Road, Las Vegas, NV. On information and belief, Defendant MOVIEGOODS is a subsidiary of Defendant ACUMEN. PLAINTIFF S TRADEMARKS. For over half a century, members of the Hells Angels Motorcycle Club have continuously employed the word mark HELLS ANGELS and a design mark depicting the side view of a helmeted, horned and feathered human skull ( the death head mark ) as collective membership marks, trademarks and service marks. These marks are used on patches, jewelry, garments, signage, publications and other personal property for the exclusive purpose of identifying the club and its active members.. Plaintiff HAMC is the owner of U.S. Trademark Registration Nos.,,,,,,,,,,0,00,,,, and,, for the HELLS ANGELS word mark and the death head mark. Certificates of title to these registrations are attached hereto as Exhibits A, B, C, D, E and F.. Through continuous and conspicuous usage, the HELLS ANGELS word mark and death head mark ("the Marks") are famous. Plaintiff HAMC has exercised legitimate control over the uses of the Marks by its duly authorized licensees, and has been diligent in abating the use of the Marks by unauthorized third parties. COMPLAINT FOR TRADEMARK INFRINGEMENT, DILUTION, Page

Case :0-cv-0-FCD-DAD Document Filed /0/0 Page of PLAINTIFF S COPYRIGHTS. Plaintiff HAMC is the sole owner by assignment from the original registrant of U.S. Copyright Reg. No. PA-- dated October,, for the motion picture entitled Hells Angels Forever which was first published in ( the HAF movie ). An abstract of the copyright registration for the HAF movie is attached hereto as Exhibit G.. Since October,, the HAF movie has been published by Plaintiff HAMC and its predecessor in interest at all times in strict conformity with the copyright laws.. Plaintiff HAMC is the owner of U.S. Copyright Reg. No. VA-- dated July,, for the graphic design of a poster promoting the motion picture Hells Angels Forever ( the HAF poster ). An abstract of the copyright registration for the HAF poster is attached hereto as Exhibit H, and the HAF poster itself is shown in Exhibit I.. Since July,, the HAF poster has been published at all times in strict conformity with the copyright laws. DEFENDANTS INFRINGEMENTS. Defendant MOVIEGOODS has, within three years prior to the filing of this complaint, distributed and sold unauthorized reproductions of the HAF poster. Defendant MOVIEGOODS has distributed and sold these reproductions in various sizes, with and without frames, and has also included the HAF poster in a collage referred to as a miniposter set. Defendant MOVIEGOODS uses Plaintiff HAMC s Marks on the posters themselves, and in the description of the posters.. Defendant MOVIEGOODS has no valid license to employ Plaintiff HAMC s Marks. Such use of the Marks by Defendant MOVIEGOODS to identify and promote its infringing posters is likely to mislead and confuse the public that Plaintiff HAMC is the source of the posters or has approved of them.. Defendant MOVIEGOODS has no valid license to make or sell copies of the HAF poster.. Plaintiff HAMC has demanded that Defendant MOVIEGOODS cease its COMPLAINT FOR TRADEMARK INFRINGEMENT, DILUTION, Page

Case :0-cv-0-FCD-DAD Document Filed /0/0 Page of calculated efforts to exploit the Marks and to infringe the copyrights, but Defendant MOVIEGOODS has refused to do so.. Defendant MOVIEGOODS was notified in writing of Plaintiff HAMC s objections to its reproduction and sale of the HAF posters, on or about March, 0, a copy of which is attached as Exhibit J. Defendant MOVIEGOODS admitted it had no license and temporarily complied, but then resumed sales within a few weeks.. Defendant MOVIEGOODS continues to wilfully defy Plaintiff HAMC s notices and warnings, by selling and delivering the infringing posters. On or about October, 0, Defendant MOVIEGOODS sold and delivered to this District a poster as shown by the receipt attached as Exhibit K.. On information and belief, Defendant ACUMEN approved, controlled and benefited from the acts of Defendant MOVIEGOODS complained of herein, and is therefore jointly responsible for the damages to Plaintiff HAMC.. Unless restrained and enjoined, Defendant MOVIEGOODS and Defendant ACUMEN will continue the acts complained of herein, which have and continue to cause irreparable damage to Plaintiff HAMC. FIRST CAUSE OF ACTION (Lanham Act (a) U.S.C. (a) Trademark Infringement). Plaintiff incorporates by reference paragraphs through above.. The use by Defendant MOVIEGOODS and Defendant ACUMEN of the Marks is likely to cause confusion, mistake, or deception at common law and within the meaning of U.S.C., thereby infringing the Marks to Plaintiff's immediate and irreparable damage. The conduct of Defendant MOVIEGOODS and Defendant ACUMEN continues to damage Plaintiff and unless enjoined will further impair the value of Plaintiff's Marks and the goodwill which Plaintiff has acquired in the Marks. SECOND CAUSE OF ACTION (Lanham Act (c) U.S.C. (c) Trademark Dilution). Plaintiff incorporates by reference paragraphs through above. COMPLAINT FOR TRADEMARK INFRINGEMENT, DILUTION, Page

Case :0-cv-0-FCD-DAD Document Filed /0/0 Page of. The commercial use by Defendant MOVIEGOODS and Defendant ACUMEN of Plaintiff's Marks has and will cause dilution of the Marks by blurring. By their acts as herein alleged, Defendant MOVIEGOODS and Defendant ACUMEN willfully intended to trade on Plaintiff s reputation and to cause dilution of Plaintiff's famous Marks. As a consequence of Defendants acts, Plaintiff HAMC is entitled to injunctive and other relief as prayed. THIRD CAUSE OF ACTION ( U.S.C. 0(a) Copyright Infringement). Plaintiff incorporates by reference paragraphs through above.. Defendant MOVIEGOODS has infringed Plaintiff s exclusive right under U.S.C. () by preparing an unauthorized derivative work based on the HAF movie.. Defendant MOVIEGOODS has infringed Plaintiff s exclusive right under U.S.C. () by making unauthorized reproductions of the HAF poster.. By its acts of infringement as alleged herein, Defendant MOVIEGOODS has engaged in unfair trade practices and unfair competition against Plaintiff HAMC. PRAYER FOR RELIEF WHEREFORE, Plaintiff HAMC prays for judgment that: A. Defendant MOVIEGOODS and Defendant ACUMEN be preliminarily and permanently enjoined from directly or indirectly using Plaintiff HAMC's Marks, or any design similar thereto, pursuant to U.S.C. (a); B. Defendant MOVIEGOODS and Defendant ACUMEN be preliminarily and permanently enjoined from directly or indirectly infringing Plaintiff HAMC's copyrights, pursuant to U.S.C. 0(a); C. All articles bearing Plaintiff HAMC's Marks, or infringing its copyrights, in the possession of Defendant MOVIEGOODS and Defendant ACUMEN be seized and destroyed as the Court may direct; D. Defendant MOVIEGOODS and Defendant ACUMEN be required to account to Plaintiff HAMC for any and all revenues derived from their COMPLAINT FOR TRADEMARK INFRINGEMENT, DILUTION, Page

Case :0-cv-0-FCD-DAD Document Filed /0/0 Page of infringements; E. Defendant MOVIEGOODS and Defendant ACUMEN be required to pay to Plaintiff HAMC damages and profits; F. Defendant MOVIEGOODS and Defendant ACUMEN be required to pay to Plaintiff HAMC statutory damages pursuant to U.S.C. 0(c) G. Plaintiff HAMC be awarded exemplary damages; H. Plaintiff HAMC be awarded its reasonable attorney's fees pursuant to U.S.C. (a) and U.S.C. 0(b); I. The costs of this action be awarded to Plaintiff HAMC; and J. The court grant such other and further relief as it deems just. Dated: November, 0 FRITZ CLAPP Attorney for Plaintiff HELLS ANGELS MOTORCYCLE CORPORATION JURY DEMAND Plaintiff hereby demands trial by jury of all issues triable herein. Dated: November, 0 FRITZ CLAPP Attorney for Plaintiff HELLS ANGELS MOTORCYCLE CORPORATION COMPLAINT FOR TRADEMARK INFRINGEMENT, DILUTION, Page