Case 3:17-cv MO Document 1 Filed 09/27/17 Page 1 of 10

Similar documents
Case 3:17-cv MO Document 1 Filed 09/27/17 Page 1 of 10

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR THE STATE OF OREGON FOR MULTNOMAH COUNTY. Case No.

Case 6:18-cv MC Document 1 Filed 01/04/18 Page 1 of 12

Case 3:17-cv SB Document 7 Filed 05/01/17 Page 1 of 16

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR THE STATE OF OREGON FOR MULTNOMAH COUNTY. Case No.

Case 3:17-cv AC Document 1 Filed 11/09/17 Page 1 of 15

Case 3:18-cv SB Document 1 Filed 07/13/18 Page 1 of 20

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR THE STATE OF OREGON FOR MULTNOMAH COUNTY. Case No.

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR THE STATE OF OREGON FOR MULTNOMAH COUNTY. Case No.

Case 3:18-cv AC Document 1 Filed 10/26/18 Page 1 of 17

Case 3:13-cv JE Document 1 Filed 12/20/13 Page 1 of 13 Page ID#: 1

Case 6:16-cv AA Document 1 Filed 10/13/16 Page 1 of 6

Case 3:17-cv YY Document 1 Filed 08/26/17 Page 1 of 18

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR THE STATE OF OREGON FOR MULTNOMAH COUNTY. Case No. COMPLAINT. Negligence

12/4/ :33 PM 17CV52549 IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR THE STATE OF OREGON FOR MULTNOMAH COUNTY. Case No. COMPLAINT

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT DISTRICT OF OREGON COMPLAINT

Case 3:14-cv L Document 1 Filed 06/18/14 Page 1 of 6 PageID 1

1/1/2019 4:52 PM 19CV00011 IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR THE STATE OF OREGON FOR MULTNOMAH COUNTY. Case No. COMPLAINT FACTUAL ALLEGATIONS

Case 2:15-cv PA-AJW Document 1 Filed 01/02/15 Page 1 of 11 Page ID #:1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. Deadline.

Case: 1:17-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 11/28/17 Page 1 of 17 PageID #:1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

2/13/ :36 PM 19CV07131 IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR THE STATE OF OREGON FOR MULTNOMAH COUNTY. Case No. COMPLAINT. Negligence FACTUAL ALLEGATIONS

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF JACKSON COUNTY, MISSOURI AT INDEPENDENCE

Case 1:17-cv Document 1 Filed 02/24/17 Page 1 of 12 PageID: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA CASE NO.: 1. BREACH OF IMPLIED CONTRACT 2. TRESPASS TO CHATTEL

Case 1:17-cv Document 1 Filed 06/26/17 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION. Plaintiffs, Defendant.

4/2/2018 2:16 PM 18CV12858 IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR THE STATE OF OREGON FOR MULTNOMAH COUNTY. Case No. COMPLAINT FACTUAL ALLEGATIONS

Attorneys for Plaintiffs MICHELLE RENEE MCGRATH and VERONICA O BOY, on behalf of themselves, and all others similarly situated

Case 3:17-cv DMS-RBB Document 1 Filed 03/17/17 PageID.1 Page 1 of 20

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS GALVESTON DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION

Case: 1:17-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 08/18/17 Page 1 of 13 PageID #:1

Case 3:14-cv ST Document 1 Filed 02/14/14 Page 1 of 13 Page ID#: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON PORTLAND DIVISION

Case 8:14-cv VMC-AEP Document 1 Filed 11/19/14 Page 1 of 26 PageID 1

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR THE STATE OF OREGON FOR MULTNOMAH COUNTY. Case No. COMPLAINT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SACRAMENTO DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION. Plaintiff, Defendant. CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT

CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT - 1 -

Case 8:17-cv CEH-JSS Document 1 Filed 08/09/17 Page 1 of 14 PageID 1

THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case 1:18-cv RDB Document 1 Filed 05/25/18 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MARYLAND

NO. 14 The Plaintiff, State of Washington, by and through its attorneys Robert W. Ferguson,

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF OREGON PORTLAND DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION. Hon.

Attorneys for Plaintiffs and the putative class.

Case 3:18-cv AC Document 1 Filed 10/26/18 Page 1 of 17

Case 1:17-cv MBH Document 4 Filed 09/06/17 Page 1 of 10. v. Case No.: 1:17-cv MBH FIRST AMENDED CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA. Plaintiffs, COLLECTIVE AND CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT v. (JURY TRIAL DEMANDED)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT

COMPLAINT FOR INJUNCTIVE RELIEF AND DAMAGES. Plaintiffs, vs. CLASS ACTION ALLEGED JURY TRIAL REQUESTED

Case 3:16-cv Document 1 Filed 04/26/16 Page 1 of 17

Case 3:16-cv YY Document 1 Filed 07/10/16 Page 1 of 5

Case: 1:17-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 10/27/17 Page 1 of 14 PageID #:1 THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION. Plaintiffs, Defendant.

STATE OF MICHIGAN IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR THE COUNTY OF WAYNE

Case 9:18-cv RLR Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/09/2018 Page 1 of 10. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA MIAMI DIVISION. CASE NO: 1:15-cv RNS

IN THE STATE COURT OF BRYAN COUNTY STATE OF GEORGIA AMENDED COMPLAINT. Plaintiff, Lloyd Dan Murray, Jr. ( Plaintiff ) brings this action against ILG

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MONTANA BILLINGS DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SACRAMENTO DIVISION

Case 7:18-cv Document 1 Filed 01/12/18 Page 1 of 15 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 3:18-cv RV-CJK Document 1 Filed 02/02/18 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA. Civil Case Number:

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF OREGON

Case 4:08-cv Document 1 Filed 01/04/2008 Page 1 of 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION

Case 5:16-cv Document 1 Filed 09/12/16 Page 1 of 16 Page ID #:1

Case: 1:16-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 11/23/16 Page 1 of 13 PageID #:1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

Case 1:13-cv GAO Document 1 Filed 06/10/13 Page 1 of 16 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON PORTLAND DIVISION

BANKRUPTCY LAW CENTER, APC Abbas Kazerounian, Esq. [SBN: ] Ahren A. Tiller, Esq. [SBN ]

1:15-cv JMC Date Filed 04/06/15 Entry Number 1 Page 1 of 12 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA

Case 8:16-cv Document 1 Filed 03/18/16 Page 1 of 19 Page ID #:1

Case 1:17-cv CWD Document 1 Filed 06/25/17 Page 1 of 22

RELIEF FOR VIOLATIONS OF: SOLARCITY CORPORATION,

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MARYLAND

Case 3:10-cv ST Document 1 Filed 05/17/2010 Page 1 of 13

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA

Case 1:17-cv Document 1 Filed 02/01/17 Page 1 of 23. Plaintiff,

Case 1:17-cv Document 1 Filed 06/09/17 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 29 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Case3:15-cv Document1 Filed01/09/15 Page1 of 16

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA. Case No. CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT PRELIMINARY STATEMENT

Superior Court of California

Case 2 : 08-cv JWL-DJW Document 43 Filed 08/22/2008 Page 1 of 12

Case3:15-cv Document1 Filed07/10/15 Page1 of 12

Case 2:16-cv SGC Document 1 Filed 12/15/16 Page 1 of 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT

-2- First Amended Complaint for Damages, Injunctive Relief and Restitution SCOTT COLE & ASSOCIATES, APC ATTORNEY S AT LAW TEL: (510)

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON. Adv. Proc. No. COMPLAINT

Case 2:14-cv JFW-AGR Document 1 Filed 06/10/14 Page 1 of 18 Page ID #:1

Case: 1:17-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 12/27/17 Page 1 of 15 PageID #:1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

Attorneys for Plaintiff and the Class UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 9

Attorneys for Plaintiff STEVE THOMA UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA STEVE THOMA

Courthouse News Service

Case 8:19-cv SDM-AAS Document 1 Filed 03/04/19 Page 1 of 10 PageID 1

Case 2:14-cv Document 1 Filed 04/14/14 Page 1 of 14 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI WESTERN DIVISION

Transcription:

Case 3:17-cv-01528-MO Document 1 Filed 09/27/17 Page 1 of 10 Michael Fuller, OSB No. 09357 Lead Attorney for Plaintiffs Olsen Daines PC US Bancorp Tower 111 SW 5th Ave., Suite 3150 Portland, Oregon 97204 michael@underdoglawyer.com Direct 503-201-4570 Mark Geragos, Pro Hac Pending Ben Meiselas, Pro Hac Pending Lori Feldman, Pro Hac Pending Of Attorneys for Plaintiffs Geragos & Geragos Historic Engine Co. No. 28 644 South Figueroa Street Los Angeles, California 90017 geragos@geragos.com Phone 213-625-3900 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF OREGON PORTLAND DIVISION MICHELLE VANDERZANDEN and JAMES CARLTON, individually and on behalf of all others, v. Plaintiffs, SONIC CORPORATION, Case No. 3:17-cv-1528 CLASS ACTION ALLEGATION COMPLAINT Negligence 28 U.S.C. 1332 Demand for Jury Trial Defendant. COMPLAINT Page 1 of 10

Case 3:17-cv-01528-MO Document 1 Filed 09/27/17 Page 2 of 10 1. THE PARTIES Sonic Corporation is a billion dollar fast-food restaurant chain and a Delaware corporation with over 3,500 locations in 44 states including Oregon and Washington. 2. Michelle Vanderzanden is an individual consumer residing in the Portland, Oregon area who used a debit card to purchase fast-food at Sonic Corporation and later had her debit card information compromised by Sonic Corporation. 3. James Carlson is an individual consumer residing in the Bellingham, Washington area who used a credit card to purchase fastfood at Sonic Corporation and later had his debit card information compromised by Sonic Corporation. 4. JURISDICTION AND VENUE This Court has jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. 1332 because the parties are citizens of different states and the amount in controversy for the national class estimated at 5,000,000 consumers exceeds $2.3 billion exclusive of penalties. Venue is proper under 28 U.S.C. 1391 COMPLAINT Page 2 of 10

Case 3:17-cv-01528-MO Document 1 Filed 09/27/17 Page 3 of 10 because the bulk of Oregon consumers with credit and debit card information stored by Sonic Corporation live in the Portland area. 5. FACTUAL ALLEGATIONS Plaintiffs file this complaint as a class action on behalf of an estimated 5,000,000 consumers harmed by Sonic Corporation s failure to adequately protect their credit and debit card information. This complaint requests Sonic Corporation provide fair compensation in an amount that will ensure every consumer harmed by its data breach will not be out-of-pocket for the costs of independent third-party credit repair and monitoring services. This complaint s allegations are based on personal knowledge as to plaintiffs conduct and made on information and belief as to the acts of others. 6. Throughout the past year, Sonic Corporation collected and stored credit and debit card information from plaintiffs at various point-of-sale systems in its restaurants. 7. Sonic Corporation owed a legal duty to plaintiffs to use reasonable care to protect their credit and debit card information from unauthorized access by third parties. Sonic Corporation knew that its failure to protect plaintiffs credit and debit card information from COMPLAINT Page 3 of 10

Case 3:17-cv-01528-MO Document 1 Filed 09/27/17 Page 4 of 10 unauthorized access would cause serious risks of credit harm and identify theft for years to come. 8. On September 27, 2017, Sonic Corporation announced for the first time that its credit card processor had been hacked by unauthorized third parties, subjecting plaintiffs to credit harm and identify theft and other economic losses. Sonic Corporation unjustifiably failed to timely notify consumers of its data breach in the most expeditious manner possible, and only chose to notify consumers of its breach after hackers were caught attempting to sell its stolen information in underground cybercrime stores. 9. In an attempt to increase profits, Sonic Corporation negligently failed to maintain adequate technological safeguards to protect plaintiffs information from unauthorized access by hackers. Sonic Corporation knew and should have known that failure to maintain adequate technological safeguards would eventually result in a massive data breach. Sonic Corporation could have and should have substantially increased the amount of money it spent to protect against cyber-attacks but chose not to. Consumers should not have to bear the expense caused by Sonic Corporation s negligent failure to safeguard their credit and debit card information from cyber-attackers. COMPLAINT Page 4 of 10

Case 3:17-cv-01528-MO Document 1 Filed 09/27/17 Page 5 of 10 10. As a direct result of Sonic Corporation s negligence as alleged in this complaint, plaintiffs suffered the actual loss of their credit and debit card information to hackers seeking to use their information for fraudulent illegal purposes. The economic losses Sonic Corporation caused consumers across the country could have been mitigated had Sonic Corporation notified them that their information was compromised in the most expeditious manner possible. 11. CLASS ALLEGATIONS Plaintiffs file this complaint as a national class action lawsuit. The class consists of: 1. Consumers like plaintiffs who had credit and debit card information collected and stored by Sonic Corporation in the past year, and who were subject to risk of data loss and credit harm and identity theft as a result of Sonic Corporation s negligent data breach, and who could have prevented or mitigated their harm had Sonic Corporation notified them that their information was compromised in the most expeditious manner possible. COMPLAINT Page 5 of 10

Case 3:17-cv-01528-MO Document 1 Filed 09/27/17 Page 6 of 10 12. Excluded from the class are all attorneys for the class, officers and members of Sonic Corporation, including officers and members of any entity with an ownership interest in Sonic Corporation, any judge who sits on the case, and all jurors and alternate jurors who sit on the case. 13. The exact number of aggrieved consumers, estimated at 5,000,000, can be determined based on Sonic Corporation s sales data. 14. Every aggrieved consumer suffered injuries as alleged in this complaint directly and proximately caused by Sonic Corporation s negligent failure to adequately protect its database from unauthorized access by third-party hackers and failure to notify consumers that their information was compromised in the most expeditious manner possible. 15. The class is so numerous that joinder is impracticable. Upon information and belief, the class includes 5,000,000 consumers based on advertisements selling Sonic Corporation s stolen information in underground cybercrime stores. COMPLAINT Page 6 of 10

Case 3:17-cv-01528-MO Document 1 Filed 09/27/17 Page 7 of 10 16. Common questions of fact and law predominate over any questions affecting only individual class members. Common questions include whether plaintiffs and class members are entitled to equitable relief, whether Sonic Corporation acted negligently, and whether plaintiffs and class members are entitled to recover money damages. 17. Plaintiffs claims are typical of the claims of the class because each suffered risk of loss or credit harm or identity theft or economic losses caused by Sonic Corporation s negligent failure to safeguard their credit and debit card information, the injuries suffered by plaintiffs and the class members are identical (i.e. the costs to monitor and repair their credit through a third-party service for at least 24 months, the amounts of economic losses caused by identity theft and credit harm and unauthorized use of credit and debit cards), and plaintiffs claims for relief are based upon the same legal theories as are the claims of the other class members. Plaintiffs will fairly and adequately protect and represent the interests of the class because their claims are typical of the claims of the class, they are represented by nationally known and locally respected attorneys who have experience handling class action litigation and consumer protection cases who are qualified and competent, and who will vigorously prosecute this COMPLAINT Page 7 of 10

Case 3:17-cv-01528-MO Document 1 Filed 09/27/17 Page 8 of 10 litigation, and their interests are not antagonistic or in conflict with the interests of the class. 18. A class action is superior to other methods for fair and efficient adjudication of this case because common questions of law and fact predominate over other factors affecting only individual members, as far as plaintiffs know, no class action that purports to include consumers suffering the same injury has been commenced in Oregon, individual class members have little interest in controlling the litigation, due to the high cost of actions, the relatively small amounts of damages, and because plaintiffs and their attorneys will vigorously pursue the claims. The forum is desirable because the bulk of consumers in Oregon who suffered injury caused by Sonic Corporation s negligence reside in the Portland metropolitan area. A class action will be an efficient method of adjudicating the claims of the class members who have suffered relatively small damages, as a result of the same conduct by Sonic Corporation. In the aggregate, class members have claims for relief that are significant in scope relative to the expense of litigation. The availability of Sonic Corporation s consumer data will facilitate proof of class claims, processing class claims, and distributions of any recoveries. COMPLAINT Page 8 of 10

Case 3:17-cv-01528-MO Document 1 Filed 09/27/17 Page 9 of 10 19. CLASS CLAIM FOR RELIEF NEGLIGENCE As alleged in this complaint, Sonic Corporation undertook care of credit and debit card information belonging to plaintiffs and the putative class, then breached its legal duty by failing to maintain adequate technological safeguards, falling below the standard of care in the technological industry, directly and proximately causing foreseeable risk of data loss and credit harm and identity theft and other economic losses, in amounts to be decided by the jury. Sonic Corporation s failure to comply with laws requiring it to notify consumers of its data breach in the most expeditious manner possible constituted negligence per se. 20. Plaintiffs and the class are entitled to equitable relief in the form of an accounting of exactly how their credit and debit card information was accessed without authorization by third parties, restitution, and unless agreed upon by Sonic Corporation, an order to preserve all documents and information (and electronically stored information) pertaining to this case. 21. Demand for jury trial. COMPLAINT Page 9 of 10

Case 3:17-cv-01528-MO Document 1 Filed 09/27/17 Page 10 of 10 follows: PRAYER FOR RELIEF Plaintiffs seek relief for themselves and the proposed class as A. Unless agreed upon by Sonic Corporation, an order to preserve all documents and information (and electronically stored information) pertaining to this case, B. An order certifying this matter as a class action, C. Judgment against Sonic Corporation for fair compensation in an amount to be decided by the jury, and costs, D. And other relief the Court deems necessary. September 27, 2017 RESPECTFULLY FILED, s/ Michael Fuller Michael Fuller, OSB No. 09357 Lead Attorney for Plaintiffs Olsen Daines PC US Bancorp Tower 111 SW 5th Ave., Suite 3150 Portland, Oregon 97204 michael@underdoglawyer.com Direct 503-201-4570 COMPLAINT Page 10 of 10