CITY OF MIAMI OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY LEGAL OPINION - #06-005

Similar documents
Special Magistrate Ordinance

WHEREAS, section , Florida Statutes, provides that charter counties may

City of Miami. Legislation. Ordinance: 13331

ORDINANCE NO AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ARCATA AMENDING THE ADMINISTRATION CITATION PROCEDURE OF THE MUNICIPAL CODE

City of Miami. Legislation. Resolution: R

City of Miami. Legislation Ordinance: File Number: 4204 Final Action Date: 10/25/2018

CITY OF ST. AUGUSTINE

City of Miami. Legislation Ordinance File Number: 3292 Final Action Date: 3/22/2018

ORDINANCE 474. WHEREAS, the City Commission finds that timely inspections are the most efficient method of minimizing such hazards; and

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT DULY ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF ALACHUA COUNTY, FLORIDA, AS FOLLOWS:

..Fiscal Impact APPLICANT(S): Pedro G. Hernandez, City Manager, on behalf of the City of Miami

WHEREAS, the City Commission wishes to utilize a code enforcement system to implement the local hearing process; and

TOWNSHIP OF HARTLAND ORDINANCE NO. 74 MUNICIPAL CIVIL INFRACTION AND VIOLATIONS BUREAU ORDINANCE. (Repeal Ordinance Nos.

ORDINANCE NO Words in struck-through type are deletions from existing text. Words in underscored type are additions.

CITY OF DEERFIELD BEACH Request for City Commission Agenda

WASHTENAW COUNTY, MICHIGAN. Ordinance No. WASHTENAW COUNTY MUNICIPAL CIVIL INFRACTIONS ORDINANCE

ORDINANCE NO

DESOTO COUNTY, FLORIDA. ORDINANCE No

ORDINANCE NO

BILL ORDINANCE 10003

ORDINANCE NO

ORDINANCE NO NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ENACTED BY THE CITY OF COCOA BEACH, FLORIDA, as follows:

ORDINANCE WHEREAS, this ordinance sets forth the requirements for borrow pits and

1. Adopt an ordinance amending the Santa Ana Municipal Code for additional remedies for Code Enforcement violations.

DESOTO COUNTY, FLORIDA. ORDINANCE No

City of Miami. Legislation Ordinance File Number: 3152 Final Action Date: 12/14/2017

WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners is authorized to designate code

ORDINANCE NO WHEREAS, the City finds that this Ordinance is in the interests of the public health, safety, and welfare.

WASHTENAW COUNTY, MICHIGAN. Ordinance No. WASHTENAW COUNTY DOG LICENSE MUNICIPAL CIVIL INFRACTION ORDINANCE

CHAPTER 10: GENERAL PROVISIONS

LEE COUNTY ORDINANCE NO

ORDINANCE NO WHEREAS, the Village of Pinecrest (the Village ) has adopted certain tree cutting

AN ORDINANCE CREATING A MUNICIPAL SERVICE r" TAXING UNIT TO BE KNOWN AS THE "HILL 'N DALE g'::~

ORDINANCE No

ORDINANCE NO IT IS HEREBY ORDAINED BY THE CITY OF DEBARY AS FOLLOWS:

ORDINANCE NO

ORDINANCE NO. BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CASA GRANDE, ARIZONA: Permitting or Encouraging Underage Drinking

ORDINANCE NO

TITLE I: GENERAL PROVISIONS. Chapter 10. GENERAL PROVISIONS

CITY OF DEERFIELD BEACH Request for City Commission Agenda

NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Perris hereby ordains as follows:

ORDINANCE NO Civil Infractions Ordinance Wayland

ORDINANCE # WHEREAS, on November 8, 2012, the voters of Florida approved Amendment 1 to

Model Zoning Ordinance

CITY OF DEERFIELD BEACH Request for City Commission Agenda

CHAPTER 25 GENERAL PROVISIONS

CITY OF BONITA SPRINGS, FLORIDA ` ORDINANCE NO

CHAPTER 1. CODE INTRODUCTION. Section 100 General Provisions

Borough of Susquehanna Depot Susquehanna County, Pennsylvania. Ordinance No. 467 INTERNATIONAL PROPERTY MAINTENANCE CODE

The City of Ypsilanti Notice of Adopted Ordinance Ordinance No. 1256

Chapter 1 - GENERAL PROVISIONS

ORDINANCE NO BE IT ORDAINED by the Mayor and Board of Aldermen of the City of Amory, Mississippi, as follows:

City of Coral Gables Planning Department Staff Report

LEE COUNTY ORDINANCE NO

CITY OF BONITA SPRINGS, FLORIDA BONITA SPRINGS ORDINANCE NO

The City of Ypsilanti Adopted Ordinance Ordinance No. 1256

Laguna Niguel Nuisance Animals

BEFORE THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS MARTIN COUNTY, FLORIDA ORDINANCE NO. 610

TITLE 1 GENERAL CITY PROVISIONS.

ORDINANCE NO

NOW THEREFORE BE IT ENACTED AND ORDAINED

SUMTER COUNTY ORDINANCE

PROPOSED REVISIONS TO CHAPTER 162 FLORIDA STATUTES 2010

BE IT ORDAINED BY THE JURISDICTION OF,

CHAPTER 1 GENERAL PROVISIONS

Ordinance No. BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ARLINGTON, TEXAS: 1.

Recommendation to Adopt Proposed Ordinance Relating to Pain Management Clinics

Agenda Item A.2 CONSENT CALENDAR Meeting Date: June 16, 2009

Municipal Lobbying Ordinance

CITY OF MIAMI CITY ATTORNEY'S FICE MEMORA

ARTICLE 7 - VIOLATIONS, ENFORCEMENT AND PENALTIES

ORDINANCE NO. 725 (AS AMENDED THROUGH 725

CHAPTER 1. CODE OF ORDINANCES GENERAL PROVISIONS

STATE OF MICHIGAN COUNTY OF WAYNE CITY OF ALLEN PARK

NOW THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF WEST PLAINS, MISSOURI, AS FOLLOWS:

ORDINANCE NO 100 CITY OF PATTISON, TEXAS SUBSTANDARD BUILDING ORDINANCE

ORDINANCE provides for the general powers and duties of the City Council and states as follows:

[ ] Consent [ ] Regular [X] Public Hearing

ORDINANCE NO WHEREAS, the City Commission discussed a proposal to eliminate odd year elections; and

ORDINANCE NO AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CAPE CANAVERAL, BREVARD COUNTY, FLORIDA,

TOWN OF SEWALL S POINT

APPENDIX TO CODE OF ORDINANCES USE AND MAINTENANCE OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES

29 ordinances that require a criminal history records check and a 3 to 5-day waiting period in

BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF BROWARD COUNTY, FLORIDA: 17 18

the City Council has previously adopted ordinances regulating animal control; and

ILLINOIS. Illinois Compiled Statutes Chapter /5(h)

AGENDABILL. Mark Wardlaw, Community Development Director

NOW, THEREFORE BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RIVIERA BEACH, FLORIDA, THAT:

Title 1 GENERAL PROVISIONS. Chapter 1.01 CODE ADOPTION

CITY OF DEERFIELD BEACH Request for City Commission Agenda

ORDINANCE NO AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF DUNCANVILLE, TEXAS, ADOPTING THE THE "UNIFORM BUILDING CODE STANDARDS", AS

Public hearing to adopt Ordinance 1375 C.S. amending Title 15, Buildings and Construction, of the Martinez Municipal Code

ORDINANCE NO

The Board of Supervisors of the County of Riverside, State of California, ordains as follows:

ORDINANCE NO. WHEREAS, Article XI of the Charter requires the City Commission to place the charter review committee s proposals on the ballot; and


ORDINANCE NO * * * * * WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Mont Belvieu, Texas, ( City ) is

MONROEVILLE MUNICIPAL AUTHORITY MUNICIPALITY OF MONROEVILLE

This article shall be known and may be cited as the "Mississippi Credit Availability Act."

ORDINANCE NO (b) Authority of Permitting Officer. The permitting officer is hereby authorized to accept or deny applications.

Transcription:

CITY OF MIAMI OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY LEGAL OPINION - #06-005 TO : Commissioner FROM : Jorge L. Fernand DATE : August 18,200 RE : Maximum Civi tty for Code Enforcement Citations You requested a legal opinion as to whether the City Commission is authorized to increase to $1,000 the maximum civil penalty of $500 that is currently prescribed underarticle 8.1 of the Zoning Ordinance 11000, "Tree Protection" and Florida Statutes. The answer is in the negative. Florida Statutes, Section 162.21, Enforcement of county or municipal codes or ordinances ; penalties ; specifically, subsection 162.21(5) (b) states that a maximum civil penalty for a civil citation shall not exceed $500. A copy of Section 162.21 is attached. Therefore, if a code enforcement inspector issues a civil citation (ticket) for a violation of the Tree Protection Ordinance, the maximum penalty allowed by state law is $500 for that ticket. However, the per diem fines pursuant to a Code Enforcement Board case, as distinguished from a civil citation above, may be increased to $1000 per day if the City Commission passes the appropriate legislation. Florida Statutes, Section162.09, Administrative fines ; costs of repair ; liens ; specifically, subsection 162.09(2) (d) provides : A county or a municipality having a population equal to or greater than 50, 000 may adopt, by a vote of at least a majority plus one of the entire governing body of the county or municipality, an ordinance that gives code enforcement boards or special magistrates, or both, authority to impose fines in excess of the limits set forth in paragraph (a). Such fines shall not exceed $1,000 per day per violation for a first violation, $5,000 per day per violation for a repeat violation, and up to $15,000 per violation if the code enforcement board or special magistrate finds the violation to be irreparable or irreversible in nature. In addition to such fines, a code enforcement board or special magistrate may impose additional fines to cover all costs incurred by the local government in enforcing its codes and all costs of repairs pursuant to subsection (1). Any ordinance imposing such fines shall include criteria to be considered by the code enforcement board or special magistrate in determining the amount of the fines, including, but not limited to, those factors set forth in paragraph (b). In April of 2005, pursuant to a request from the administration and in accordance with the above referenced provision of the Florida Statutes, this office drafted legislation that would increase the per diem daily fines to a maximum $1,000 per day. This legislation was scheduled

Commissioner Linda Haskins August 18, 2006 Page 2 Re : Legal Opinion #06-005 for City Commission and was subsequently pulled by the administration. A copy of the legislation is attached for your review. The proposed legislation would authorize the Code Enforcement Board to impose fines up to $1,000 per day for code violations, including violations of the Tree Protection Ordinance. Please advise if I can be of further assistance. cc : Mariano Loreto De Mola, Director of Code Enforcement Enclosures JLF/vm

COUNTY ORGANIZATION AND INTERGOVERNMENTAL RELATIONS Chapter 162 COUNTY OR MUNICIPAL CODE ENFORCEMENT.62.21 Enforcement of county or municipal codes or ordinances; penalties.-- 1) As used in this section, "code enforcement officer" means any designated employee it agent of a county or municipality whose duty it is to enforce codes and ordinances enacted by the county or municipality. 2) A county or a municipality may designate certain of its employees or agents as code!nforcement officers. The training and qualifications of the employees or agents for such lesignation shall be determined by the county or the municipality. Employees or agents vho may be designated as code enforcement officers may include, but are not limited o, code inspectors, law enforcement officers, animal control officers, or firesafety nspectors. Designation as a code enforcement officer does not provide the code!nforcement officer with the power of arrest or subject the code enforcement officer to he provisions of ss. 943.085-943.255. Nothing in this section amends, alters, or ontravenes the provisions of any state-administered retirement system or any state- :upported retirement system established by general law. 3)(a) A code enforcement officer is authorized to issue a citation to a person when, )aced upon personal investigation, the officer has reasonable cause to believe that the reason has committed a civil infraction in violation of a duly enacted code or ordinance rnd that the county court will hear the charge. b) Prior to issuing a citation, a code enforcement officer shall provide notice to the reason that the person has committed a violation of a code or ordinance and shall!stablish a reasonable time period within which the person must correct the violation. >uch time period shall be no more than 30 days. If, upon personal investigation, a code enforcement officer finds that the person has not corrected the violation within the time reriod, a code enforcement officer may issue a citation to the person who has :ommitted the violation. A code enforcement officer does not have to provide the person vith a reasonable time period to correct the violation prior to issuing a citation and may mmediately issue a citation if a repeat violation is found or if the code enforcement officer has reason to believe that the violation presents a serious threat to the public reaith, safety, or welfare, or if the violation is irreparable or irreversible, c) A citation issued by a code enforcement officer shall be in a form prescribed by the :ounty or the municipality and shall contain :. The date and time of issuance.!. The name and address of the person to whom the citation is issued. 1, The date and time the civil infraction was committed.

The facts constituting reasonable cause. The number or section of the code or ordinance violated. The name and authority of the code enforcement officer. The procedure for the person to follow in order to pay the civil penalty or to contest he citation. The applicable civil penalty if the person elects to contest the citation. 1. The applicable civil penalty if the person elects not to contest the citation..0. A conspicuous statement that if the person fails to pay the civil penalty within the ime allowed, or fails to appear in court to contest the citation, the person shall be leemed to have waived his or her right to contest the citation and that, in such case, udgment may be entered against the person for an amount up to the maximum civil ienalty. 4),After issuing a citation to an alleged violator, a code enforcement officer shall leposit the original citation and one copy of the citation with the county court. 5) A county or a municipality is authorized to enforce codes and ordinances under the >rovisions of this section and may enact an ordinance establishing procedures for the mplementation of such provisions, including a schedule of violations and penalties to be assessed by code enforcement officers. If a county or municipality chooses to enforce :odes or ordinances under the provisions of this section, each code or ordinance or the )rdinance enacted by the county or municipality establishing procedures for mplementation of this section shall provide : a) That a violation of a code or an ordinance is a civil infraction. b) A maximum civil penalty not to exceed $500. c) A civil penalty, of less than the maximum civil penalty if the person who has :ommitted the civil infraction does not contest the citation. d) For the issuance of a citation by a code enforcement officer who has reasonable :ause to believe that a person has committed an act in violation of a code or an )rdinance. e) For the contesting of a citation in county court, f) Such procedures and provisions as are necessary to provide for the enforcement of a :ode or an ordinance under the provisions of this section. 6) Any person who willfully refuses to sign and accept a citation issued by a code!nforcement officer shall be guilty of a misdemeanor of the second degree, punishable is provided in s. 775.082 or s. 775.083.

') The provisions of this part shall not apply to the enforcement pursuant to ss. 553.79 id 553.80 of the Florida Building Code adopted pursuant to s. 553.73 as applied to instruction, provided that a building permit is either not required or has been issued by ie county or the municipality. 3) The provisions of this section are additional and supplemental means of enforcing )unty or municipal codes or ordinances and may be used for the enforcement of any )de or ordinance, or for the enforcement of all codes : and ordinances. Nothing )ntained in this section shall prohibit a county or municipality from enforcing its codes r ordinances by any other means. istory.--s. 11, ch. 89-268 ; s. 7, ch. 94-291 ; s. 1444, ch. 95-147 ; s. 3, ch. 96-385 ; s. 4, ch. 98-287 ; s. 115, ch. )00-141 ; s. 35, ch. 2001-186 ; s. 4, ch. 2001-372.

DRAFT 4/20/05 ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE MIAMI CITY COMMISSION AMENDING CHAPTER 2 ADMINISTRATION/ARTICLE X OF THE CODE OF THE CITY OF MIAMI, FLORIDA, AS AMENDED, ENTITLED "CODE ENFORCEMENT" MORE PARTICULARLY BY AMENDING SECTIONS 2-811, 2-814 AND 2-817 OF SAID CODE ; TO AMEND THE DEFINITIONS SECTION AND TO CLARIFY THE MAXIMUM DAILY FINES ; CONTAINING A REPEALER PROVISION AND A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE ; PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE ; AND PROVIDING FOR INCLUSION IN THE CITY CODE. WHEREAS, the City of Miami has a continuous problem with violations of it codes and ordinances ; and WHEREAS, Chapter 162.09 of the Florida Statutes provides for enhanced code enforcement fines ; WHEREAS, Chapter 162.09 (d) and of the Florida Statutes allows a municipality having a population equal to or greater than 50,000 to adopt, by a vote of at least a majority plus one of the entire governing body of the municipality, an ordinance that gives code enforcement boards or special masters, authority to impose fines not to exceed $1,000 per day per violation for a first violation, $5,000 per day per violation for a repeat violation, and up to $15,000 per violation if the code enforcement board or special master finds the violation to be irreparable or irreversible re ; and WHEREAS, the population within the City of Miami is over the required statutory amount of 50,000 inhabitants ; and

WHEREAS, it is the intent of the City of Miami to promote, protect, and improve the health, safety, and welfare of its citizens by actively seeking compliance from violators of the City's codes and ordinances ; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MIAMI, FLORIDA : Section 1. The recitals and findings contained in the Preamble to this Ordinance are hereby adopted by reference thereto and incorporated herein as if fully set forth in this Section. Section 2. Chapter 2/Article X of the Code of the City M of Miami, Florida, as amended, entitled " Code Enforcement", is hereby amended in the following particulars :!' "CHAPTER 2 ADMINISTRATION ARTICLE X CODE ENFORCEMENT Sec. 2-811. Definitions Repeat violation means a violation of a provision of a code or ordinance by a person who has been previously found through a code enforcement board or any other quasi-judicial or judicial process, to have violated or who has admitted violating the same provision within 5 years prior to the violation, notwithstanding the violations occur at different locations. words and/or figures stricken through shall be deleted. Underscored words and/or figures shall be added. The remaining provisions are now in effect and remain unchanged. Asterisks indicate omitted and unchanged material,

Sec. 2-814. Enforcement procedure. (c) If a violation is found to have been repeated by a violator after having once been cited, the code inspector shall notify the violator that the violation must be cured immediately. The code inspector, upon notifying the violator of the repeated violation, shall then notify the code enforcement board or special master by requesting an immediate hearing. The code enforcement board or special master, through its clerical staff, shall promptly schedule a hearing before the board or special master and shall provide notice pursuant to F.S. 162.12. The case may then be presented to and sanctioned by the enforcement board or special master even if the repeated violation has been corrected prior to the hearing, and notice shall so state. Upon finding that the same violation has been repeated by the same violator(s), the board or special- master may order the violator(s) to pay a fine of not more than $5,000.00 per day per violation $999.09 for each day the repeated violation continues past the date set for compliance, for each time the violation has been repeated. Sec. 2-817. Administrative costs, fines ; liens. (a) The board or special master, upon notification by the code inspector that an order has been complied with within the time specified in the order, shall accept such notification as acknowledgment of compliance and no fines shall be imposed. (b) The board or special master, upon notification by the code inspector or city attorney that an order of the board or special master has not been complied with by the set time for compliance, may order the violator(s) to pay a fine of not more than ~259-8-B $1000.00 fer each day the -:,.',t :,.., per day per _v iolation that continues past the date set for compliance, and of more than $5,000 per day per violation for a repeat. However, if a code enforcement board or special master finds the violation to be irreparable or irreversible in nature, it may impose a fine not_ to exceed $15,_000 per violation. (c) In determining the amount of the fine, if any, the board or special master shall consider the following factors : (1) The gravity of the violation.

(2) Any actions taken by the violator to correct the violation ; and (3) Any previous violations committed by the violator. (d) 9nly- t =e An enforcement board or special master may reduce a fine once a violator has complied with the order, and for good cause shown. The board or special master however, hereby authorizes the city to mitigate fines with violators, provided that the total amount of the daily fine imposed by the enforcement board or special master may only be reduced to the percentage stated in the schedule below : Section. All ordinances or parts of ordinances insofar as they are inconsistent or in conflict with this Ordinance are hereby repealed. F the provisions of Section 4. If any section, part of section, paragraph, clause, phrase or word of this Ordinance is declared invalid, the remaining provisions of this Ordinance shall not be affected. Section 5. It is the intention of the City Commission that the provisions of this Ordinance shall become and be made a part of the Code of the City of Miami, Florida, as amended, which provisions may be renumbered or relettered and that the word "ordinance" may be changed to "section", "article", or other appropriate word to accomplish such intention. Section 6. This ordinance shall become effective thirty (30) days after final reading and adoption thereof.z' This Ordinance shall become effective as specified herein unless vetoed by the Mayor within. ten days from the date it was passed and adopted. if the Mayor vetoes this Ordinance, it shall become effective

PASSED ON FIRST READING BY TITLE ONLY this day of 2005. PASSED AND ADOPTED ON SECOND AND FINAL READING BY TITLE ONLY this day of, 2005. MANUEL A. DIAZ, MAYOR ATTEST : PRISCILLA A. CITY CLERK THOMPSON APPROVED AS TO FORM AND CORRECTNESS : JORGE L. FERNANDEZ CITY ATTORNEY immediately upon override of the veto by the City Commission or upon the effective date stated herein, whichever is later.