PRE-TRIAL CHAMBER III. Judge Antoine Kesia-Mbe Mindua, Presiding Judge Judge Chang-ho Chung Judge Raul C. Pangalangan

Similar documents
TRIAL CHAMBER VIII. Judge Raul C. Pangalangan, Presiding Judge Judge Antoine Kesia-Mbe Mindua Judge Bertram Schmitt SITUATION IN THE REPUBLIC OF MALI

PRE-TRIAL CHAMBER II. SITUATION IN DARFUR, SUDAN IN THE CASE OF THE PROSECUTOR v. OMAR HASSAN AHMAD AL BASHIR. Public Document

TRIAL CHAMBER VI. SITUATION IN THE DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC OF THE CONGO IN THE CASE OF THE PROSECUTOR v. BOSCO NTAGANDA. Public

TRIAL CHAMBER VI. SITUATION IN THE DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC OF THE CONGO IN THE CASE OF THE PROSECUTOR v. BOSCO NTAGANDA. Public

PRE-TRIAL CHAMBER II SITUATION IN DARFUR, SUDAN. IN THE CASE OF THE PROSECUTOR v. OMAR HASSAN AHMAD AL-BASHIR. Public

PRE-TRIAL CHAMBER II. Judge Ekaterina Trendafilova, Presiding Judge Judge Hans-Peter Kaul Judge Cuno Tarfusser SITUATION IN DARFUR, SUDAN

^o^ ^ ^ ^ PRE-TRIAL CHAMBER II. Judge Ekaterina Trendafilova, Presiding Judge Judge Hans-Peter Kaul Judge Cuno Tarfusser SITUATION IN DARFUR, SUDAN

_In_t_e_r_n_a_t_io_n_a_l_e~ ~~~ ~ International

PRE-TRIAL CHAMBER II SITUATION IN THE DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC OF THE CONGO IN THE CASE OF THE PROSECUTOR V. BOSCO NTAGANDA. Public

/ \ PRE-TRIAL CHAMBER II. Judge Ekaterina Trendafilova, Presiding Judge Judge Hans-Peter Kaul Judge Cuno Tarfusser SITUATION IN DARFUR, SUDAN

/ ^, a I PRE-TRIAL CHAMBER II. Judge Ekaterina Trendafilova, Presiding Judge Judge Hans-Peter Kaul Judge Cuno Tarfusser SITUATION IN DARFUR, SUDAN

PRE-TRIAL CHAMBER II. Judge Cuno Tarfusser, Presiding Judge. SITUATION IN DARFUR, SUDAN IN THE CASE OF THE PROSECUTOR v. OMAR HASSAN AHMAD AL BASHIR

TRIAL CHAMBER IX SITUATION IN UGANDA. IN THE CASE OF THE PROSECUTOR v. DOMINIC ONGWEN. Public

PRE-TRIAL CHAMBER I. Judge Sanji Mmasenono Monageng, Single Judge SITUATION IN DARFUR, SUDAN

PRE-TRIAL CHAMBER II. SITUATION IN DARFUR, SUDAN IN THE CASE OF THE PROSECUTOR v. OMAR HASSAN AHMAD AL BASHIR. Public

PRE-TRIAL CHAMBER III. Judge Silvia Fernandez de Gurmendi, Single Judge

Original: English Date: 26 October 2015 PRE-TRIAL CHAMBER II SITUATION IN DARFUR, SUDAN

PRE-TRIAL CHAMBER I SITUATION IN THE REPUBLIC OF COTE D'IVOIRE IN THE CASE OF THE PROSECUTOR V. LAURENT GBAGBO. Public

TRIAL CHAMBER IX SITUATION IN UGANDA. IN THE CASE OF THE PROSECUTOR v. DOMINIC ONGWEN

PRE-TRIAL CHAMBER II SITUATION IN DARFUR, SUDAN IN THE CASE OF. The Prosecutor v Omar Hassan Ahmad AL BASHIR ( Omar Al Bashir )

PRE-TRIAL CHAMBER I. Judge Silvia Fernandez de Gurmendi, Presiding Judge Judge Hans-Peter Kaul Judge Christine Van den Wyngaert

THE PRESIDENCY. Judge Chile Eboe-Osuji, President Judge Robert Fremr, First Vice-President Judge Marc Perrin de Brichambaut, Second Vice-President

TRIAL CHAMBER VI. SITUATION IN THE DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC OF THE CONGO IN THE CASE OF THE PROSECUTOR v. BOSCO NTAGANDA. Public

PRE-TRIAL CHAMBER I SITUATION IN LIBYA. IN THE CASE OF THE PROSECUTOR v. SAIFAL-ISLAM GADDAFI and ABDULLAH AL-SENUSSI. Public

TRIAL CHAMBER III SITUATION IN THE CENTRAL AFRICAN REPUBLIC IN THE CASE OF THE PROSECUTOR V. JEAN-PIERRE BEMBA GOMBO. Public

TRIAL CHAMBER IX SITUATION IN UGANDA. IN THE CASE OF THE PROSECUTOR v. DOMINIC ONGWEN. Public

PRE-TRIAL CHAMBER I. Judge Sylvia Steiner, Presiding Judge Judge Sanji Mmasenono Monageng Judge Cuno Tarfusser

TRIAL CHAMBER VI. SITUATION IN THE DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC OF THE CONGO IN THE CASE OF THE PROSECUTOR v. BOSCO NT AG AND A. Public

TRIAL CHAMBER V(A) SITUATION IN THE REPUBLIC OF KENYA. IN THE CASE OF THE PROSECUTOR v. WILLIAM SAMOEI RUTO and JOSHUA ARAP SANG.

TRIAL CHAMBER III. Judge Sylvia Steiner, Presiding Judge Judge Joyce Aluoch Judge Kuniko Ozaki SITUATION IN THE CENTRAL AFRICAN REPUBLIC

PRE-TRIAL CHAMBER I. Judge Silvia Fernández de Gurmendi, Presiding Judge Judge Ekaterina Trendafilova Judge Christine Van den Wyngaert

TRIAL CHAMBER V(B) SITUATION IN THE REPUBLIC OF KENYA. IN THE CASE OF THE PROSECUTOR v. UHURU MUIGAI KENYATTA

Cour Pénale International. Criminal Court. Date: 3 February 2012 TRIAL CHAMBER III

TRIAL CHAMBER IX SITUATION IN UGANDA IN THE CASE OF PUBLIC

^Si._.,^äf^ PRE-TRIAL CHAMBER I. Judge Silvia Fernandez de Gurmendi, Single Judge

PRE-TRIAL CHAMBER I. Judge Silvia Fernández de Gurmendi, Presiding Judge Judge Hans-Peter Kaul Judge Christine Van den Wyngaert SITUATION IN LIBYA

TRIAL CHAMBER II. Judge Marc Perrin de Brichambaut, Presiding Judge Judge Olga Herrera Carbuccia Judge Péter Kovács

TRIAL CHAMBER IX SITUATION IN UGANDA IN THE CASE OF. THE PROSECUTOR v. DOMINIC ONGWEN. Public

TRIAL CHAMBER IX SITUATION IN UGANDA IN THE CASE OF. THE PROSECUTOR v. DOMINIC ONGWEN. Public

PRE-TRIAL CHAMBER II. Judge Ekaterina Trendafilova, Presiding Judge Judge Hans-Peter Kaul Judge Cuno Tarfusser SITUATION IN DARFUR, SUDAN

TRIAL CHAMBER III. Judge Sylvia Steiner, Presiding Judge Judge Joyce Aluoch Judge Kuniko Ozaki

TRIAL CHAMBER I. Judge Geoffrey Henderson, Presiding Judge Judge Olga Herrera Carbuccia Judge Bertram Schmitt

TRIAL CHAMBER VI SITUATION IN THE DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC OF THE CONGO. IN THE CASE OF THE PROSECUTOR v. BOSCO NTAGANDA. Public

PRE-TRIAL CHAMBER II. Judge Mauro Politi, Single Judge

TRIAL CHAMBER III. Judge Sylvia Steiner, Presiding Judge Judge Joyce Aluoch Judge Kuniko Ozaki

PRE-TRIAL CHAMBER III. SITUATION IN THE CENTRAL AFRICAN REPUBLIC IN THE CASE OF THE PROSECUTOR v. JEAN-PIERRE BEMBA GOMBO.

TRIAL CHAMBER IX SITUATION IN UGANDA. IN THE CASE OF THE PROSECUTOR v. DOMINIC ONGWEN. Public

TRIAL CHAMBER I SITUATION IN THE REPUBLIC OF CÔTE D'IVOIRE IN THE CASE OF. Public. Decision on the submission and admission of evidence

PRE-TRIAL CHAMBER I. Judge Péter Kovács, Presiding Judge Judge Marc Perrin de Brichambaut Judge Reine Adélaïde Sophie Alapini-Gansou

PRE-TRIAL CHAMBER II. Judge Ekaterina Trendafilova, Single Judge

THE PRESIDENCY. Judge Silvia Fernández de Gurmendi, President Judge Joyce Aluoch, First Vice-President Judge Christine Van Den Wyngaert

TRIAL CHAMBER V SITUATION IN THE REPUBLIC OF KENYA. IN THE CASE OF THE PROSECUTOR v. FRANCIS KIRIMI MUTHAURA AND UHURU MUIGAI KENYATTA.

i^\ % ^> ^...^ 'j^ TRIAL CHAMBER III Judge Sylvia Steiner, Presiding Judge Judge Joyce Aluoch Judge Kuniko Ozaki

TRIAL CHAMBER IX SITUATION IN UGANDA. IN THE CASE OF THE PROSECUTOR v. DOMINIC ONGWEN. Public with Public Annexes A and B

TRIAL CHAMBER VI. SITUATION IN THE DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC OF THE CONGO IN THE CASE OF THE PROSECUTOR v. BOSCO NTAGANDA. Public

>Si. f"^ Original: English No. ICC-01/11-01/11 OA 4 Date: 23 August 2013 THE APPEALS CHAMBER

r r ;J - PRE-TRIAL CHAMBER II Judge CunoTarfusser, Presiding Judge Judge Marc Perrin de Brichambaut Judge Chang-ho Chung SITUATION IN DARFUR, SUDAN

TRIAL CHAMBER II. SITUATION IN THE DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC OF THE CONGO IN THE CASE OF THE PROSECUTOR v. GERMAIN KATANGA AND MATHIEU NGUDJOLO CHUI

PRE-TRIAL CHAMBER I. SITUATION IN THE DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC OF THE CONGO IN THE CASE Of THE PROSECUTOR v. Germain Katanga and Mathieu Ngudjolo Chui

TRIAL CHAMBER III SITUATION IN THE CENTRAL AFRICAN REPUBLIC. IN THE CASE OF THE PROSECUTOR v.jean-pierre BEMBA GOMBO

Original: English No. ICC-01/09-01/11 OA 10 Date: 29 September 2015 THE APPEALS CHAMBER

PRE-TRIAL CHAMBER III. Judge Silvia Fernandez de Gurmendi, Presiding Judge Judge Elizabeth Odio Benito Judge Adrian Fulford

THE APPEALS CHAMBER SITUATION IN THE REPUBLIC OF CÔTE D'IVOIRE. IN THE CASE OF THE PROSECUTOR v. LAURENT GBAGBO AND CHARLES BLÉ GOUDÉ

THE APPEALS CHAMBER SITUATION IN THE DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC OF THE CONGO. IN THE CASE OF THE PROSECUTOR v. MATHIEU NGUDJOLO CHUI.

Original: English No. ICC-02/05-03/09 OA 5 Date: 21 January 2015 THE APPEALS CHAMBER SITUATION IN DARFUR, SUDAN

SITUATION IN THE CENTRAL AFRICAN REPUBLIC IN THE CASE OF THE PROSECUTOR V. JEAN-PIERRE BEMBA GOMBO. Public Document

TRIAL CHAMBER III. Judge Sylvia Steiner, Presiding Judge Judge Joyce Aluoch Judge Kuniko Ozaki

imi PRE-TRIAL CHAMBER I Judge Silvia Fernandez de Gurmendi, Presiding Judge Judge Hans-Peter Kaul Judge Christine Van den Wyngaert

PRE-TRIAL CHAMBER I. SITUATION IN THE DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC OF CONGO IN THE CASE OF ÏHE PROSECUTOR v. BOSCO NTAGANDA. Under Seal

TRIAL CHAMBER III SITUATION IN THE CENTRAL AFRICAN REPUBLIC. IN THE CASE OF THE PROSECUTOR v. Jean Pierre Bemba Gombo

PRE-TRIAL CHAMBER I. Judge Silvia Fernández de Gurmendi, Presiding Judge Judge Hans-Peter Kaul Judge Christine Van den Wyngaert

Vf, ^^»rl^iip^ \f THE APPEALS CHAMBER

:^i TRIAL CHAMBER III SITUATION IN THE CENTRAL AFRICAN REPUBLIC IN THE CASE OF THE PROSECUTOR V. JEAN-PIERRE BEMBA GOMBO. Public

TRIAL CHAMBER I. Judge Adrian Fulford, Presiding Judge Judge Elizabeth Odio Benito Judge René Blattmann

TRIAL CHAMBER I. SITUATION IN THE REPUBLIC OF CÔTE D IVOIRE IN THE CASE OF THE PROSECUTOR v. LAURENT GBAGBO and CHARLES BLÉ GOUDÉ.

THE APPEALS CHAMBER. SITUATION IN THE DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC OF THE CONGO IN THE CASE OF THE PROSECUTOR v. GERMAIN KATANGA. Public document URGENT

PRE-TRIAL CHAMBER I. Judge Claude Jorda, President Judge Akua Kuenyehia Judge Sylvia Steiner

THE APPEALS CHAMBER. Judge Erkki Kourula Judge Sang-Hyun Song Judge Akua Kuenyehia Judge Anita Ušacka Judge Sanji Mmasenono Monageng

THE APPEALS CHAMBER SITUATION IN THE REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE CASE OF. THE PROSECUTOR v. WILLIAM SAMOEI RUTO AND JOSHUA ARAP SANG.

THE APPEALS CHAMBER SITUATION IN THE DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC OF THE CONGO. IN THE CASE OF THE PROSECUTOR v.thomas LUBANGA DYILO.

PRE-TRIAL CHAMBER II SITUATION IN UGANDA. Public. Decision on legal representation of Victims a/0101/06 and a/0119/06

Judge Cuno Tarfusser, Presiding Judge Judge Sanji Mmasenono Monageng Judge Sylvia Steiner

SITUATION IN THE CENTRAL AFRICAN REPUBLIC IN THE CASE OF THE PROSECUTOR V. JEAN-PIERRE BEMBA GOMBO. Public document

TRIAL CHAMBER V SITUATION IN THE REPUBLIC OF KENYA. IN THE CASE OF THE PROSECUTOR v. FRANCIS KIRIMI MUTHAURA AND UHURU MUIGAI KENYATTA.

PRE-TRIAL CHAMBER II SITUATION IN THE CENTRAL AFRICAN REPUBLIC IN THE CASE OF THE PROSECUTOR V, JEAN-PIERRE BEMBA GOMBO.

PRE-TRIAL CHAMBER I SITUATION IN THE DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC OF CONGO. IN THE CASE OF THE PROSECUTOR v. Germain Katanga and Mathieu Ngudjolo Chui

Date: 30 April 2018 THE APPEALS CHAMBER

a m: /.VT-A\\ ^-zj Original: English No. ICC-01/04-01/10 OA 4 Date: 7 March 2012 THE APPEALS CHAMBER

TRIAL CHAMBER VII SITUATION IN THE CENTRAL AFRICAN REPUBLIC

THE APPEALS CHAMBER. Judge Akua Kuenyehia, Presiding Judge Judge Sang-Hyun Song Judge Sanji Mmasenono Monageng Judge Erkki Kourula Judge Anita Usacka

^N* TRIAL CHAMBER I. Judge Adrian Fulford, Presiding Judge Judge Elizabeth Odio Benito Judge René Blattmann


PRE-TRIAL CHAMBER I SITUATION IN THE DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC OF THE CONGO IN THE CASE OF. THE PROSECUTOR v. Germain Katanga and Mathieu Ngudjolo Chui

Judge Ekaterina Trendafilova, Duty Judge

:^i PRE-TRIAL CHAMBER I. SITUATION IN THE REPUBLIC OF COTE D'lVOIRE IN THE CASE OF THE PROSECUTOR V. LAURENT GBAGBO.

PRE-TRIAL CHAMBER I SITUATION IN DARFUR, SUDAN. IN THE CASE OF THE PROSECUTOR V. OMAR HASSAN AHMAD AL BASHIR ("Omar Al-Bashir") Public Document

-im TRIAL CHAMBER III SITUATION IN THE CENTRAL AFRICAN REPUBLIC IN THE CASE OF THE PROSECUTOR V. JEAN-PIERRE BEMBA GOMBO. Public

PRE-TRIAL CHAMBER I. Judge Sanji Mmasenono Monageng, Single Judge SITUATION IN DARFUR, THE SUDAN

Regulations of the Court

PRE-TRIAL CHAMBER I. Judge Sanji Mmasenono Monageng, Presiding Judge Judge Sylvia Steiner Judge Cuno Tarfusser

Transcription:

ICC-02/17-6 09-11-2017 1/8 RH PT Original: English No. ICC-02/17 Date: 9 November 2017 PRE-TRIAL CHAMBER III Before: Judge Antoine Kesia-Mbe Mindua, Presiding Judge Judge Chang-ho Chung Judge Raul C. Pangalangan SITUATION IN THE ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF AFGHANISTAN PUBLIC Order to the Victims Participation and Reparation Section Concerning Victims Representations No: ICC-02/17 1/8 9 November 2017

ICC-02/17-6 09-11-2017 2/8 RH PT Order to be notified in accordance with regulation 31 of the Regulations of the Court to: The Office of the Prosecutor Fatou Bensouda, Prosecutor James Stewart, Deputy Prosecutor Counsel for the Defence Legal Representatives of Victims Legal Representatives of Applicants Unrepresented Victims Unrepresented Applicants for Participation/Reparations The Office of Public Counsel for Victims The Office of Public Counsel for the Defence States Representatives Amicus Curiae REGISTRY Registrar Herman von Hebel, Registrar Victims and Witnesses Unit Nigel Verrill, Chief Defence Support Section Detention Section Victims Participation and Reparations Section Philipp Ambach, Chief Other No: ICC-02/17 2/8 9 November 2017

ICC-02/17-6 09-11-2017 3/8 RH PT PRE-TRIAL CHAMBER III ( Chamber ) of the International Criminal Court ( Court ) issues this order concerning the issue of victims representations pursuant to article 15(3) of the Rome Statute ( Statute ) in the context of the situation in the Islamic Republic of Afghanistan ( Afghanistan ). 1. On 30 October 2017, the Prosecutor informed the Presidency of her decision to request judicial authorisation to commence an investigation into the situation in Afghanistan pursuant to regulation 45 of the Regulations of the Court ( Regulations ). 1 2. On 3 November 2017, the Presidency assigned the situation to the Chamber. 2 3. On 7 November 2017, the Registry submitted the Registry s Request for Extension of Notice Period and Submissions on Aspects Related to the Article 15(3) Process ( Request ). 3 4. On 9 November 2017, the Judges of the Chamber issued a decision indicating that Judge Antoine Kesia Mbe Mindua will act as the Presiding Judge of the Chamber in the situation in Afghanistan. 4 5. On 9 November 2017, the Judges of the Chamber granted the Prosecutor s request for an extension of the page limit concerning her request for authorisation of an investigation in the situation in Afghanistan. 5 1 ICC-02/17-1-AnxI. 2 Presidency, Decision assigning the situation in the Islamic Republic of Afghanistan, ICC- 02/17-1. 3 ICC-02/17-3-Conf with two confidential annexes. A public redacted version of the request is also available. 4 ICC-02/17-4. 5 Pre-Trial Chamber III, Decision on the Election of the Presiding Judge and the Prosecutor s Request for Extension of the Page Limit, ICC-02/17-5. No: ICC-02/17 3/8 9 November 2017

ICC-02/17-6 09-11-2017 4/8 RH PT 6. The Chamber notes article 15(3) and (4) of the Statute, rules 16, 50, 85 and 102 of the Rules of Procedure and Evidence ( Rules ) and regulations 35, 50(1) and 86(1) and (9) of the Regulations. 7. According to article 15(3) of the Statute, [v]ictims may make representations to the Pre-Trial Chamber. Rule 50(1) of the Rules mandates the Prosecutor to inform victims known to her, inter alia, via public notice by general means. Following this provision of information by the Prosecutor, the victims may make representations in writing to the Chamber within 30 days, as foreseen in regulation 50(1) of the Regulations. Lastly, pursuant to rule 50(4) of the Rules, the Chamber may decide on the procedure to be followed, including the matter of victims representations. 6 8. With a view to properly organising the process of victims representations, and in light of the issues raised in the Request, the Chamber deems it pertinent to issue this order. 9. Victims Representation Form. The Registry submitted a draft representation form and draft guidelines on how to fill in such form requesting that their use be approved by the Chamber. 7 The form will be available in English, Dari and Pashto. 8 10. Upon review of the documents, the Chamber hereby approves the form and related guidelines by means of which victims may communicate with the Court. The Chamber, however, notes that, with regard to the participation of victims in proceedings before this Court, victims are generally not under an obligation to use the standard form developed by the Court. In this regard, 6 Similarly, Pre-Trial Chamber II, Order to the Victims Participation and Reparations Section Concerning Victims Representations Pursuant to Article 15(3) of the Statute, 10 December 2009, ICC-01/09-4, para. 6. 7 Request, ICC-02/17-3-Red, para. 10. 8 Request, ICC-02/17-3-Red, para. 12. No: ICC-02/17 4/8 9 November 2017

ICC-02/17-6 09-11-2017 5/8 RH PT regulation 86(1) of the Regulations simply states that standard forms shall, to the extent possible, be used by victims. Furthermore, rule 102 of the Rules provides that where a person is unable, due to a disability or illiteracy, to make a written request, application, observation or other communication to the Court, the person may make such request, application, observation or communication in audio, video or other electronic form. Therefore, the Chamber underlines that, if victims submit their representations in a manner other than by standard form, this should also be accepted. 11. Extension of Time. The Registry requests that the 30-day time limit be extended by a margin the Chamber deems appropriate. 9 In this regard, the Registry requests that the Chamber issue a decision on the request before the Prosecutor gives her public notice to victims so that she would be in a position to refer to a potentially extended time period for victims to make representations. 10 12. The Chamber, noting the reasons advanced by the Registry to justify the extension of time and, on the basis of regulation 35(1) of the Regulations, hereby extends the time limit for the submission of representations to Wednesday, 31 January 2018. Accordingly, the Prosecutor is ordered to indicate in her public notice the time limit as established by the Chamber. 13. Preliminary Assessment of Representations and Transmission of Representations. The Registry informs the Chamber that it will assess the rule 85 criteria and that it will report on the victims views on the Prosecutor s impending request for an authorisation of the commencement of an investigation. 11 It also informs the Chamber that it intends to transmit the 9 Request, ICC-02/17-3-Red, para. 14. 10 Request, ICC-02/17-3-Red, para. 15. 11 Request, ICC-02/17-3-Red, para. 11. No: ICC-02/17 5/8 9 November 2017

ICC-02/17-6 09-11-2017 6/8 RH PT representations received on a rolling basis, possibly every two weeks, together with a brief preliminary assessment, including, inter alia, some statistical information on the type of representations received, the languages in which the representations were made, victims gender, age, ethnicity, locations and the scope of the alleged crimes. 12 Finally, the Registry states that it will submit a comprehensive report after the expiry of the deadline for the submissions of victims representations. 13 14. The Chamber endorses the Registry approach to conduct a preliminary assessment of the victims representations with regard to rule 85 of the Rules. 14 In this context, the Chamber recalls that, for the purposes of representations at this stage, and given the limited scope of article 15 proceedings, the conditions set out in rule 85 of the Rules should be assessed on the basis of the intrinsic coherence of the information given by the victim(s). 15 15. Furthermore, the Victims Participation and Reparations Section ( VPRS ), as the specialised unit within the Registry responsible for assisting victims and groups of victims in accordance with regulation 86(9) of the Regulations, is encouraged to identify community leaders of the affected groups willing to act on behalf of victims who may wish to make representations (collective representations). Considering the present circumstances, the Chamber is of the view that this may assist in streamlining 12 Request, ICC-02/17-3-Red, para. 16. 13 Request, ICC-02/17-3-Red, para. 17. 14 It is recalled that the location of rule 85 in the Rules is indicative of a general provision relating to victims, applicable to various stages of the proceedings (...) [and that] the object and purpose [of this rule] is to define who are victims, see Appeals Chamber, Judgment on the appeals of The Prosecutor and The Defence against Trial Chamber I s Decision on Victims Participation of 18 January 2008, 11 July 2008, ICC-01/04-01/06-1432, paras 57-58. 15 Pre-Trial Chamber II, Order to the Victims Participation and Reparations Section Concerning Victims Representations Pursuant to Article 15(3) of the Statute, 10 December 2009, ICC-01/09-4, para. 8. No: ICC-02/17 6/8 9 November 2017

ICC-02/17-6 09-11-2017 7/8 RH PT the receipt of victims representations and, at the same time, minimise any possible risk to victims. This should not, however, prevent victims from submitting individual representations. 16. As a result, the VPRS is ordered to (i) identify, to the extent possible, the community leaders of the affected groups to act on behalf of those victims who may wish to make representations; (ii) receive and collect victims representations, be it collective or individual; (iii) conduct a preliminary assessment, as set out in this order, whether the conditions set out in rule 85 have been met; and (iv) transmit incoming representations on a rolling basis, possibly every two weeks, together with a brief preliminary assessment, as set out in paragraphs 13-14 of the present order. Lastly, the Chamber agrees that the VPRS submit a final comprehensive report after closure of the deadline to receive victims representations. No: ICC-02/17 7/8 9 November 2017

ICC-02/17-6 09-11-2017 8/8 RH PT FOR THESE REASONS, THE CHAMBER HEREBY a) APPROVES the draft representation form and guidelines as attached to the Request; b) EXTENDS the time limit for victims to submit their representations to Wednesday, 31 January 2018; c) ORDERS the VPRS to implement the procedure as outlined in paragraphs 14-16 of the present order. Done in both English and French, the English version being authoritative. Judge Antoine Kesia-Mbe Mindua, Presiding Judge Judge Chang-ho Chung Judge Raul C. Pangalangan Dated this Thursday, 9 November 2017 At The Hague, The Netherlands No: ICC-02/17 8/8 9 November 2017