UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT

Similar documents
Nos , IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT

ORAL ARGUMENT NOT YET SCHEDULED IN NO ORAL ARGUMENT HELD SEPTEMBER 27, 2016 IN NO

ORAL ARGUMENT NOT YET SCHEDULED IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

ORAL ARGUMENT SCHEDULED FOR APRIL 17, 2017 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

No (and consolidated cases) IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT

ORAL ARGUMENT NOT YET SCHEDULED IN NO ORAL ARGUMENT HELD SEPTEMBER 27, 2016 IN NO

No UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, Plaintiff-Appellee, CHARLES D.

In the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

ORAL ARGUMENT SCHEDULED FOR NOVEMBER 9, 2017 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

ORAL ARGUMENT NOT YET SCHEDULED IN NO ORAL ARGUMENT HELD SEPTEMBER 27, 2016 IN NO

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

No ORAL ARGUMENT HELD JUNE 1, 2015 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT

No In the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit RICHARD DOUGLAS HACKFORD, Plaintiff-Appellant,

SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT

ORAL ARGUMENT NOT YET SCHEDULED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

ORAL ARGUMENT NOT YET SCHEDULED IN NO ORAL ARGUMENT HELD SEPTEMBER 27, 2016 IN NO

USCA Case # Document # Filed: 10/23/2015 Page 1 of Constitution Avenue,

JOINT MOTION TO SET BRIEFING SCHEDULE. Pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 26(b) and 10th Cir. R. 27.5, the parties jointly

MARTHA L. KING 1900 Plaza Drive Louisville, CO Telephone: (303) Direct: (303) Fax: (303)

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNOPPOSED MOTION OF PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT CITIZEN CENTER FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE OPENING BRIEF

Case 2:16-cv SWS Document 218 Filed 04/06/18 Page 1 of 4

ORAL ARGUMENT SCHEDULED FOR MAY 8, 2017 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

[ORAL ARGUMENT HELD ON APRIL 15, 2016] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT. Defendants-Appellees.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT

ORAL ARGUMENT SCHEDULED: OCTOBER 17, 2017 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

GRAY PETERSON, Appellant. CHARLES F. GARCIA, et al., Appellees

ORAL ARGUMENT SCHEDULED FOR APRIL 19, 2017 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT. No Plaintiffs-Appellees,

Case , Document 1-1, 04/21/2017, , Page1 of 2

Case 2:68-cv MHT-CSC Document 759 Filed 09/09/2005 Page 1 of 6

ORAL ARGUMENT SCHEDULED FOR JUNE 2, No (and consolidated cases) UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

ORAL ARGUMENT NOT YET SCHEDULED IN NO ORAL ARGUMENT HELD SEPTEMBER 27, 2016 IN NO

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

[ORAL ARGUMENT SCHEDULED FOR JANUARY 15, 2010] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

ORAL ARGUMENT NOT YET SCHEDULED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

Appellate Case: Document: Date Filed: 02/10/2016 Page: 1 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT

Case 3:16-cv JO Document 9 Filed 02/24/17 Page 1 of 1

Case 2:16-cv NDF Document 29 Filed 03/23/17 Page 1 of 9

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

PETITION FOR REVIEW. Pursuant to Rule 15 of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure, Circuit

Case 2:16-cv SWS Document 129 Filed 06/20/17 Page 1 of 8

ORAL ARGUMENT NOT YET SCHEDULED IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

Case 2:17-cv WB Document 85 Filed 12/10/18 Page 1 of 4 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

[ORAL ARGUMENT NOT SCHEDULED] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT : : : : MOTION TO GOVERN

No IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT. CLEAN AIR COUNCIL, et al.,

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT. Plaintiff-Appellee, Defendants-Appellants.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

No IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT. SIERRA CLUB; and VIRGINIA WILDERNESS COMMITTEE,

No IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT. DAVID JACOBS; GARY HINDES, Appellants,

Attorney for the Petitioner and my Utah Bar number is

No IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT. Ute Indian Tribe of the Uintah and Ouray Reservation, et al.

USCA Case # Document # Filed: 09/09/2011 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

No IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT UTE INDIAN TRIBE, MYTON,

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Tel: (202)

Attorney for the Petitioner and my Utah Bar number is

Case: Document: 48 Filed: 06/17/2014 Pages: 8 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT SEALED

FOR DISTRIGT OF COLUMBIA 9fHE UNITED STATES COURT OF URAL ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE ASSOCIATION; BASIN ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE; EAST

In the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) REPLY IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO TRANSFER AND HOLD CASES IN ABEYANCE

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

Case 1:18-cv CG-B Document 18 Filed 03/20/18 Page 1 of 3

Case 4:18-cv HSG Document 73 Filed 06/04/18 Page 1 of 11

Case 2:15-cv JNP-PMW Document 13 Filed 04/19/16 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF UTAH, CENTRAL DIVISION

No IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEF

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT

ORAL ARGUMENT HEARD ON SEPTEMBER 27, No and Consolidated Cases

ORAL ARGUMENT POSTPONED IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

In the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

No UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, JEFFREY ALEXANDER STERLING, and JAMES RISEN,

[ORAL ARGUMENT NOT YET SCHEDULED] Nos , STB No. FD IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

United States District Court District of Utah

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS GALVESTON DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

In The United States Court of Appeals For the Third Circuit

ORAL ARGUMENT NOT YET SCHEDULED IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

ORAL ARGUMENT NOT YET SCHEDULED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

Case 2:17-cv WB Document 97 Filed 12/26/18 Page 1 of 3 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

No IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

ORAL ARGUMENT NOT YET SCHEDULED IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT

ORAL ARGUMENT SCHEDULED FOR JUNE 2 AND 3, 2016 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. Plaintiffs, Defendants.

ORAL ARGUMENT NOT YET SCHEDULED IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

USCA Case # Document # Filed: 07/19/2011 Page 1 of 8 [NOT SCHEDULED FOR ORAL ARGUMENT] No

Transcription:

Appellate Case: 16-9542 Document: 01019783914 Date Filed: 03/23/2017 Page: 1 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT STATE OF UTAH, on behalf of the Utah Department of Environmental Quality, Division of Air Quality, Petitioner, CARBON AND EMERY COUNTIES, UTAH, and UTAH MUNICIPAL POWER AGENCY, Case No. 16-9541 Intervenors, v. UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, et al., Respondents. HEAL UTAH, et al., Intervenors. PACIFICORP, Petitioner, CARBON AND EMERY COUNTIES, UTAH, and UTAH MUNICIPAL POWER AGENCY, Case No. 16-9542 Intervenors, 1

Appellate Case: 16-9542 Document: 01019783914 Date Filed: 03/23/2017 Page: 2 v. UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, et al., Respondents, HEAL UTAH, et al., Intervenors. UTAH ASSOCIATED MUNICIPAL POWER SYSTEMS, Petitioner, CARBON AND EMERY COUNTIES, UTAH, and UTAH MUNICIPAL POWER AGENCY, Case No. 16-9543 Intervenors, v. UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, et al., Respondents. HEAL UTAH, et al., Intervenors. 2

Appellate Case: 16-9542 Document: 01019783914 Date Filed: 03/23/2017 Page: 3 DESERET GENERATION AND TRANSMISSION COOPERATIVE, Petitioner, CARBON AND EMERY COUNTIES, UTAH, and UTAH MUNICIPAL POWER AGENCY, Case No. 16-9545 Intervenors, v. UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, et al., Respondents, HEAL UTAH, et al., Intervenors. EPA S SUPPLEMENT TO ITS OPPOSITION TO THE MOTIONS TO STAY THE FINAL RULE On February 13, 2017, this Court ordered the United States Environmental Protection Agency ( EPA ) to file a supplement to its Opposition to the Motions to Stay the Final Rule informing the Court whether it continues to oppose the stay motions filed by Petitioners in the above-referenced cases by February 27, 2017. See ECF No. 1019764670. The Court granted an extension until March 9, 2017, and a 3

Appellate Case: 16-9542 Document: 01019783914 Date Filed: 03/23/2017 Page: 4 second extension until March 23, 2017. See ECF Nos. 101976649; 2029775769. In response, EPA states the following: 1. As the Court is well-aware, a new Administration took office on January 20, 2017. Scott Pruitt was confirmed as EPA s Administrator on February 17, 2017, and arrived at EPA Headquarters on February 21, 2017. At this time, the Administrator is the only Senate-confirmed official at EPA. 2. EPA staff have engaged and will continue to engage with the Administrator and other incoming administration officials to familiarize the relevant decision-makers with the issues raised in the Final Rule and the petitions for review. 3. In addition to their petitions for review filed in this Court, Petitioners have also filed administrative petitions for reconsideration of the Final Rule with EPA. Those petitions remain pending. As with the Final Rule and the petitions for review, EPA staff have engaged and will continue to engage with the Administrator and other incoming administration officials to familiarize the relevant decision-makers with the issues raised in the administrative petitions for reconsideration. 4. If, as the new administration continues to assess the Final Rule, the Agency decides to grant the administrative petitions or otherwise proposes to revise or reconsider the Final Rule, EPA will notify the Court immediately. Additionally, EPA intends to pursue alternatives to litigation with the parties. However, at this time, EPA has not changed its position with respect to the motions to stay. 4

Appellate Case: 16-9542 Document: 01019783914 Date Filed: 03/23/2017 Page: 5 Dated: March 23, 2017 Respectfully submitted, BRUCE S. GELBER Deputy Assistant Attorney General Environment and Natural Resources Division /s/ Stephanie J. Talbert STEPHANIE J. TALBERT United States Department of Justice Environment & Natural Resources Division Environmental Defense Section 999 18 th Street, South Terrace, Suite 370 Denver, CO 80005 (303) 844-7231 Stephanie.Talbert@usdoj.gov /s/ Debra J. Carfora DEBRA J. CARFORA United States Department of Justice Environment & Natural Resources Division Environmental Defense Section 601 D Street, NW, Suite 8000 Washington, DC 20004 Tel: (202) 514-2640 debra.carfora@usdoj.gov Counsel for Respondents 5

Appellate Case: 16-9542 Document: 01019783914 Date Filed: 03/23/2017 Page: 6 Certification for ECF Pleading Pursuant to CM/ECF User Manual Section II(I), I hereby certify that all required privacy redactions have been made; that, if required to file additional hard copies, the ECF submission is an exact copy of those hard copy documents; and that the ECF submission was scanned for viruses with Microsoft s Forefront Client Security, Version 4.9.219.0, which is updated daily, and, according to the program, is free of viruses. Dated: March 23, 2017 /s/ Stephanie J. Talbert STEPHANIE J. TALBERT United States Department of Justice Environment & Natural Resources Division Environmental Defense Section 999 18 th Street, South Terrace, Suite 370 Denver, CO 80005 (303) 844-7231 Stephanie.Talbert@usdoj.gov Counsel for Respondents 6

Appellate Case: 16-9542 Document: 01019783914 Date Filed: 03/23/2017 Page: 7 Certificate of Service I hereby certify that I electronically filed the foregoing EPA S SUPPLEMENT TO ITS OPPOSITION TO THE MOTIONS TO STAY THE FINAL RULE with the clerk of the court for the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit using the electronic case filing system of the court. Participants in the case who are registered CM/ECF users will be served by the CM/ECF system. The following will be served by mail: Bryce Bird Utah Department of Air Quality P.O. Box 144820 Salt Lake City, UT 84114-4820 Mason Baker General Counsel Utah Associated Municipal Power Systems 155 North 400 West, Suite 480 Salt Lake City, UT 84103 Kate Comerford Todd Sheldon B. Gilbert Steven P. Lehotsky U.S. Chamber Litigation Center 1615 H Street, NW Washington, DC 20062-2000 Julia B. Barber Balch & Bingham 1901 6th Avenue, North, Suite 1500 Birmingham, AL 35203 Alex Bond Emily Fisher Edison Electric Institute 701 Pennsylvania Ave. NW Washington, DC 20004-2696 7

Appellate Case: 16-9542 Document: 01019783914 Date Filed: 03/23/2017 Page: 8 Robert Meyers Mark Thomson Crowell & Moring 1001 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW Suite 1100 Washington, DC 20004 Email: RMeyers@crowell.com Dated: March 23, 2017 /s/ Stephanie J. Talbert STEPHANIE J. TALBERT United States Department of Justice Environment & Natural Resources Division Environmental Defense Section 999 18 th Street, South Terrace, Suite 370 Denver, CO 80005 (303) 844-7231 Stephanie.Talbert@usdoj.gov Counsel for Respondents 8