Plean Forbairt Development Plan

Similar documents
Submission by Monaghan County Council in Response to the Draft National Planning Framework

Pre-budget Submission

Submission of Meath County Council to Ireland Our Plan - National Planning Framework

Submission to National Planning Framework

EGGE EC s Expert Group on Gender and Employment

PRETORIA DECLARATION FOR HABITAT III. Informal Settlements

NATIONAL TRAVELLER WOMENS FORUM

PUBLIC COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION. Brussels, 30 May /08 ADD 1. Interinstitutional File: 2007/0278(COD) LIMITE SOC 322 CODEC 677

Statistics Update For County Cavan

Migration Integration Strategy. A Submission by the Citizens Information Board to the Department of Justice and Equality (May 2014)

WELSH LANGUAGE IMPACT ASSESSMENT

8Race, ethnicity. and the Big Society. Context

Published by the Stationery Office, Dublin, Ireland. To be purchased from the: or through any bookseller.

2. Challenges and Opportunities for Sheffield to 2034

CONSULTATION ON SCHOOLS FOR THE FUTURE: A POLICY FOR SUSTAINABLE SCHOOLS

PERMANENT MISSION OF THE REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA TO THE UNITED NATIONS

FLAC submission in advance of the examination of Ireland s combined sixth and seventh periodic reports under the UN Convention on the Elimination of

A number of groups which are considered most vulnerable to poverty are identified in Chapter 2 of this report. They are:

Town of Niagara-on-the-Lake Official Plan Review Growth Analysis Technical Background Report

THE IMPACT OF IMMIGRATION ON ENGLAND S HOUSING

Sustainable cities, human mobility and international migration

Overview of standards for data disaggregation

A Socio-economic Profile of Ireland s Fishery Harbour Centres. Castletownbere

Session 05PS3.1: Inclusion / Exclusion

European Anti-Poverty Network (EAPN) Ireland Submission to Action Plan for Jobs 2018

Submission from Pavee Point Travellers Centre for the 12 th Session of the UPR Working Group 6 th October 2011

Submission to the Standing Committee on Community Affairs regarding the Extent of Income Inequality in Australia

RESOLUTION. Euronest Parliamentary Assembly Assemblée parlementaire Euronest Parlamentarische Versammlung Euronest Парламентская Aссамблея Евронест

Northern Ireland Assembly Elections Women s Policy Group

Quality of life is. Measuring Development

NATIONAL POPULATION PLAN FOR REGIONAL AUSTRALIA

D2 - COLLECTION OF 28 COUNTRY PROFILES Analytical paper

DONEGAL PEACE AND RECONCILIATION ACTION PLAN Donegal CDB Peace and Reconciliation Partnership

HOMELESSNESS IN ITALY

Poverty profile and social protection strategy for the mountainous regions of Western Nepal

15409/16 PL/mz 1 DG B 1C

SUMMARY. Migration. Integration in the labour market

POLICY AREA A

Intercultural Arts Strategy

Income. If the 24 southwest border counties were a 51 st state, how would they compare to the other 50 states? Population

An Equity Profile of the Southeast Florida Region. Summary. Foreword

The Equality Authority makes the following recommendations:

Statistics Canada., National Household Survey (Ottawa, ON: Statistics Canada, 2011). 3

Having regard to the opinion of the European Economic and Social Committee ( 1 ),

COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION. Brussels, 4 May /10 MIGR 43 SOC 311

Open Report on behalf of Debbie Barnes, Executive Director of Children's Services

Dobwalls and Trewidland Neighbourhood Development Plan: section 3. Evidence Base document - fourth draft September 2018

SACOSS ANTI-POVERTY WEEK STATEMENT

Ireland in the World:

MLD - Kulhudhuffushi Harbor Expansion Project

Christian Aid Ireland's Submission to the Review of Ireland s Foreign Policy and External Relations

Urbanization and Rural- Urban Migration: Theory. AEB 4906 Development Economics

Opinion of the Committee of the Regions on European Union programme for social change and innovation (2012/C 225/13)

Item No Halifax Regional Council July 19, 2016

JUSTICE AND PEACE COMMISSION PROPOSALS FOR BUDGET 2019

GLOBALIZATION, DEVELOPMENT AND POVERTY REDUCTION: THEIR SOCIAL AND GENDER DIMENSIONS

poverty, social exclusion and welfare in rural places Paul Milbourne School of City and Regional Planning Cardiff University, UK

Migration is a global phenomenon, one that includes adults, youth and children alike. And Australia is a country built on migration with almost 50%

Social and Equity Aspects of Transportation. NL Federation of Labour

Welsh Action for Refugees: briefing for Assembly Members. The Welsh Refugee Coalition. Wales: Nation of Sanctuary. The Refugee Crisis

Local Authorities and Migration: A Changing Agenda

Rural Wiltshire An overview

EQUALITY COMMISSION FOR NORTHERN IRELAND

Employment & Community Participation

Projects funded under National Funding to Promote the Integration of Immigrants

ECRE AND PICUM POSITION ON THE PROPOSAL FOR A REGULATION OF THE EUROPEAN SOCIAL FUND COM(2018) 382

All-Island Civic Dialogue on Brexit Sectoral Dialogues

FIVE YEAR WORK PROGRAMME

ANNEX 6: Summary of recent Human Development Reports for Bosnia and Herzegovina. Prepared by Dr Steve Goss

What is the All-Island Research Observatory (AIRO) AIRO & ICLRD

Sanctuary and Solidarity in Scotland A strategy for supporting refugee and receiving communities


Greater Golden Horseshoe Transportation Plan

The Migrant Rights Centre Ireland

AN BILLE UM PLEANÁIL AGUS FORBAIRT (LEASÚ) 2009 PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT (AMENDMENT) BILL 2009

Newstalk Immigration Poll. February 2016 Job Number:

Background. Types of migration

12 Socio Economic Effects

Party of European Socialists. Manifesto for the 1999 European Elections

Ethiopia. Strategy for Sweden s development cooperation with MFA

Spryfield Highlights. Household Living Arrangements. The following are highlights from the 2016 Census.

ILO Poverty Reduction through Tourism Training Program MODULE 1 THE TOURISM INDUSTRY

The case for an inwork progression service

Post-Secondary Education, Training and Labour September Profile of the New Brunswick Labour Force

Submission to the APPG on Refugees inquiry Refugees Welcome?

International Conference o n. Social Protection. in contexts of. Fragility & Forced Displacement. Brussels September, 2017.

STRENGTHENING RURAL CANADA: Fewer & Older: Population and Demographic Challenges Across Rural Canada A Pan-Canadian Report

CESCR - International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights 54 Pre-Sessional Working Group (01 Dec Dec 2014)

Appendix A. Environmental Justice Analysis

Consultation Response

EUROPEAN UNION. Brussels, 17 September /0278 (COD) PE-CONS 3645/08 SOC 376 CODEC 870

CONTRIBUTION OF THE LI COSAC. Athens, June 2014

EU-EGYPT PARTNERSHIP PRIORITIES

A. GENERAL. 21 st August Government. 1 SNAP Adequate Standard of Living Group, 7 th February 2018, Response to the Scottish

National Traveller and Roma Inclusion Strategy : Phase 2. A Submission by the Citizens Information Board on the Strategy Draft Objectives

Review of Ireland s Foreign Policy and External Relations. Public Consultation Document

Residential & labour market connections of deprived neighbourhoods in Greater Manchester & Leeds City Region. Ceri Hughes & Ruth Lupton

SOUTH AFRICAN HUMAN RIGHTS COMMISSION

SCHEME OF JUDICIAL APPOINTMENTS COMMISSION BILL 2016

Defining migratory status in the context of the 2030 Agenda

Transcription:

17 STRATEGIC CONTEXT

18 CHAPTER 2 STRATEGIC CONTEXT 2.1 The National Development Plan 2000 2006 The purpose of the National Development Plan 2000 2006 is essentially to enhance regional economies and foster the growth of new economic activity. It stresses the need for local authorities to take a wider perspective in formulating planning policy, development needs and new infrastructure. This is particularly pertinent in the case of Drogheda given it s geographical location. A number of major infrastructural projects under the NDP 2000 2006 have already impacted directly upon Drogheda whilst others will follow. These include: Drogheda Bypass (M1 Motorway) Monasterboice to Gormanstown Motorway Cloghran to Balbriggan Motorway Dublin Port Tunnel Iarnrod Eireann Railcar Servicing Centre 2.2 The National Spatial Strategy 2000 2020 Within the NDP 2000 2006 the Government objective for regional policy is to secure more balanced regional development and to reduce disparities between regions. The goal is to develop regions in order that they contribute in the greatest possible extent to the prosperity of the nation as a whole. The implementation mechanism for the NDP 2000 2006 is the National Spatial Strategy 2002 2020 (NSS 2002 2020) In the pursuit of this objective a number of regional authorities have been established. Drogheda occupies a unique position straddling two functional regional authorities, both of which are identified in the NSS 2002 2020. The Border Region to which Drogheda has been assigned lies to the north whilst the Dublin and Mid East Regions lie to the south and west of the town. Within the context of the Border Region, the NSS noted the significant potential for economic growth in Drogheda given it s existing population base, established enterprise culture, strong transportation links and associations with Greater Dublin. In relation to the Dublin and Mid East Regions of the NSS, Drogheda is given the status of Primary Development Centre. The role of Primary Development Centres within the Dublin and Mid East Regions will be essentially to become economically self sustaining

19 within their own catchment areas as well as maintaining close links to surrounding regions. Drogheda s unique location means that it s future growth will have to be assessed closely in relation to the Greater Dublin Area in particular. The NSS aims to consolidate the growth of Dublin and achieve more balanced regional development. In the case of Drogheda, this policy is likely to generate significant physical and population growth both within the Borough boundary and in the adjoining areas of South County Louth and East County Meath. Both the Dublin and Mid East and the Border, Midlands and West Regions have prepared Regional Planning Guidelines. Each local authority within the Regions has contributed to the preparation of these guidelines. Drogheda has made submissions to both Regional Authorities. The Regional Planning Guidelines will reflect the unique position of Drogheda and the benefits which the Borough can bring to both regions as a result. 2.3 Regional Context Regional development in Ireland is guided by the National Spatial Strategy (NSS). The NSS was devised by Government in order to achieve more balanced regional development which would act as a counterbalance to the Greater Dublin Area which is increasingly facing problems of congestion, high land prices and urban sprawl. Drogheda in the Border Region of the National Spatial Strategy Drogheda straddles two regional authorities although for historical and administrative reasons, it is an integral part of county Louth and therefore lies within the jurisdiction of the Border Regional Authority (BRA). Immediately south of Drogheda is the Greater Dublin Area (GDA) In this context Drogheda occupies a unique regional niche in that whilst placed within the Border Region, it is perhaps most strongly influenced by the

20 Greater Dublin Region on it s doorstep. The BRA is a largely rural region characterised in most part by physical remoteness, poor communications and consequent peripherality and disadvantage. The region has few large urban centres and in fact, Drogheda is the largest population centre in the entire region, surpassing the size even of the largest designated Gateway / Hub, Dundalk. Whilst Drogheda has been designated the status of Primary Development Centre by the NSS, it s distinct position within the region has been recognised by the Regional Planning Guidelines for the Border Region. The guidelines note that: Drogheda occupies a unique position by reason of it s strategic location on the Dublin Belfast Economic Corridor (and) it s proximity to Dublin City and Dublin International Airport. It is anticipated that Drogheda will continue to develop, driven largely by factors originating outside the Border Region. The factors which the Border Regional Authority alludes to are primarily the pressures emanating from the Greater Dublin Area. In this respect the NSS explicitly recognises that whilst Drogheda is placed within the Border Region, it nevertheless has a strong functional role within the Dublin Region, specifically: Drogheda s close functional and physical links with the GDA highlights a need to consider it s role in the spatial development of the GDA when reviewing the Strategic Planning Guidelines for the GDA It should, in addition, be noted that Louth County Council in it s capacity as local authority for the northern environs of Drogheda (beyond the Borough Boundary) has also taken cognisance of Drogheda s role in it s County plan 2003 2009: It is the view of the planning authority that Drogheda is ideally located to act as a self containing sustainable development centre to counter act the continued growth of the capital in the manner that is described in the strategic planning guidelines for the greater Dublin area. Development policy for the town and it s northern environs will reflect this view In summary, it is safe to categorise Drogheda Borough as essentially an interface between both Regions. In this respect the Borough has a role to play in both and can draw positive elements from both regions. 2.4 Local Context At a local level the plan must have due regard to the provisions of a number of policy documents. These include:, Draft Traveller Accommodation Programme 2003 2007 Louth Local Authorities, Housing Strategy for County Louth 2001 A Retail Strategy for County Louth 2002 Louth County Council Childcare Strategy 2002

21 Draft Local Area Plan for the North Drogheda Environs 2001 2.5 Population Trends The population of Drogheda (Urban Area) as recorded by the most recent census was 28,337* persons. This made Drogheda the largest town in the county and indeed, in the state. (excluding cities) The population results represented a substantial 15.7% increase in the population between 1996 and 2002. There are strong indications that the increase in population within and around Drogheda, is set to continue. Much of the growth is likely to arise from commuter based development. In many cases the new residents of Drogheda will be people with strong employment and social links to Dublin who choose to live in Drogheda and commute to the city daily. The lower cost of housing in Drogheda coupled with the completion of the M1 Drogheda Motorway By-pass and the continued upgrading of commuter rail services will strengthen this trend. Throughout all the inter-censal periods from 1951 to 2002, the population of the Borough of Drogheda has increased steadily. In particular, significant population growth rates occurred in the twenty-five year period between 1961-1986 reflecting the growth in the national population over this period, which in turn reflected significant growth in the national economy. Between 1981-86, the rate of growth had reduced to 3.6% and during the inter-censal period 1986-1991, the population of the Borough declined by slightly under 1%. This decline reflected the County decline of 1.2%, which was larger than the national population decline of 0.5% over the 1986-91 period. In the advent of the so-called Celtic Tiger period during the 1990 s Drogheda s population once again began to grow significantly. The growth partially reflected that of the adjacent Greater Dublin Area where the ripple effect which the effective powerhouse of the Irish economy has impacted strongly on adjacent local authorities in terms of the establishment of new commuting patterns by workers forced ever further from the capital by rising house prices in particular. Drogheda has been well placed to cater for such demand given it s high capacity transport links and relative proximity to the capital. The population growth of Drogheda has also been affected by a reduced rate of out migration and significant in migration both from within the state but also from Northern Ireland, Europe and the rest of the world. The influx of asylum seekers into the Borough is likely to continue to affect overall demographics. Again these trends have been manifested nationally. *Census 2002

22 Population Trends Census Year Persons Percentage Change *Estimate 1951 16,779 1961 17,085 + 1.8 % 1971 20,202 + 18.0 % 1981 23,247 + 15.0 % *1986 24,086 + 3.6 % 1991 23,848-0.98 % 1996 24,496 + 2.6 % 2002 28,337 + 15.7 % Age Profile Drogheda % Population Co. Louth % Population National % Population Age < 15 22.1 (6269) 22.7 21.1 Age 15-24 15.6 (4434) 16.1 16.4 Age 25-44 33.7 (9557) 30.3 30.1 Age 45-64 19.1 (5399) 20.5 21.1 Age 65 + 9.4 (2674) 9.4 11.1 2.6 Greater Drogheda Area In a wider context, it must be recognised that Drogheda Borough is fast approaching its natural capacity to accommodate growth within its present boundaries. This fact has been recognised not only by the Borough Council but also by the adjacent local authorities, Meath County Council to the South and Louth County Council to the North. Meath County Council is in the process of preparing Local Area Plans for those areas south of and contiguous with Drogheda Borough where there is continued strong, often commuter led, demand for housing. Louth County Council has prepared a comprehensive Local Area Plan for the North Drogheda Environs in order to provide for measured growth to the north of the Borough and to capitalise on recent infrastructural development. The three local authorities are engaged in the preparation of an overall strategy for Greater Drogheda, which will encompass all aspects of growth in the areas outlined above. The overall, Greater Drogheda Area could thus be expected to expand to an urban area accommodating some 70,000 persons by the year 2020. Greater Drogheda Population Projections South Drogheda Action Area (Meath incl. Leonard s Cross) 17,155 North Drogheda Environs 15,750 Drogheda Borough (+17.9 %) 33,404 Greater Drogheda Total 66,309

23 (Bacon Report, 2001) Greater Drogheda Area 2.7 Sustainable Development Sustainable development has been described as meeting the needs of the present generation without prejudicing the ability of future generations to meet their own needs (Brundtland Commission). This concept now lies at the core of Government policy and revolves around the necessity to balance human activity with protection of the natural environment. The Government has committed the nation to the concept through it s signature to the UN Rio Conference 1992, Agenda 21, the Treaty of Amsterdam 1997 and the Johannesburg Summit 2002. Planning Authorities play a pivotal role in promoting sustainable development by regulating the use of land in order to:

24 Minimise the environmental impact of development in terms of water quality and visual amenity Minimise the negative environmental impact of development on surface and groundwater quality and overall amenity degradation. Ensure equality of access to employment and other social infrastructure Conserve energy resources Make prudent use of existing resources Encourage community involvement in decision making on environmental matters 2.8 Agenda 21 & Local Agenda 21 Agenda 21 was agreed at the Earth Summit of 1997. The Agenda refers to nations agreeing to co-operate in achieving a reduction of greenhouse gas emissions and furthermore achieve long term sustainable development. Local Agenda 21 guidelines were first issued in 1995. These have been followed by Local Agenda 21 Towards Sustainable Communities in 2001. These latter guidelines emphasise a grass-roots approach to decision making whereby local communities can have a direct input into issues affecting their lives. The mechanism for achieving this has been the creation of new bodies for community involvement such as Childcare Committees and Strategic Policy Committees. The establishment of such structures has meant the local authorities are better equipped to take up the opportunities and challenges offered by the Local Agenda 21 process and aid in the Local Authority s role of promoting social inclusion. Ultimately Agenda 21 and Local Agenda 21 is a process which aims to integrate environmental considerations into the centre of policy in all aspects of community development. 2.9 Social Inclusion The economic success of Ireland during the 1990 s and into the present day has not benefited all it s inhabitants in the way it could be hoped. The wealth created over these years has not been equitably distributed and in fact has resulted in noticeably greater contrasts between those benefiting and those who have not. This has resulted in much greater levels of polarisation and marginalisation between different sections of society than was hitherto the case. The Government is pro-actively trying to reverse this trend through the promotion of Social Inclusion policies. These policies have been crystallised in the National Anti-Poverty Strategy 1997 and aim to achieve the following: Ensure equal access and encourage participation by all sections of society in the life of the nation Guarantee the rights of minorities through ant-discrimination legislation. Reduce inequalities particularly in relation to gender Encourage a national partnership approach Encourage self reliance through empowerment Encourage consultation with end-users particular with regard to services Significantly improve transportation services with particular reference to peripheral areas in the Border Region

25 Provide youth facilities particularly in deprived areas Ensure implementation of strategies dealing with Homelessness, Traveller Accommodation and remedial works schemes Implement a national Children s Strategy Ensure that all local authority housing developments exceeding 75 units have dedicated crèche facilities Complete consultations on the Disabilities Bill The NDP 2000 2006 also aims to promote social inclusion through measures aimed at re-integrating the socially excluded, long term unemployed and a larger proportion of the female population, into the labour force. In addition, certain at risk social groups have been specifically targeted by the Government. They include Children from large families, Single adult households, Lone parents, People with Disabilities, Travellers, Refugees / Asylum Seekers, Homeless Persons, the Elderly and Early School Leavers. 2.10 Planning and Social Inclusion intends to address the issue of social inclusion directly through it s role as the planning authority for the area. In this respect planning for built development can promote social inclusion through: The identification of locations where a Local Area Plan or similar mechanism would be appropriate to tackle urban decline. Such a plan would be approached with the needs of the local community to the fore. In addition, such a plan would involve community involvement from the outset. Ensure that access for people with disabilities is an inherent component of all new planning decisions, where appropriate. Promote environmental improvement schemes in co-operation with local communities particularly in publicly owned housing estates. Promote access to transport facilities and particularly, public transport services as a means of ensuring access for all sections of the community. Provide a broad variety of housing types to meet a variety of housing needs across the community including implementation of the County Louth Housing Strategy

26 2.11 Plan Implementation The success of the Plan in addressing the development and land use needs of Drogheda over the proceeding five years will depend on action by in conjunction, when necessary, with adjoining Local Authorities, other statutory bodies, agencies, the private sector and local communities. This Joined-Up approach to development challenges forms the approach taken by and will be applied when required, throughout the Plan period. The implementation of the Plan, in order to achieve it s strategic goals will be carried out by the application of planning control and enforcement and through the preparation of further area based plans and transportation / traffic management schemes. In general will endeavour to ensure widespread public consultation, as appropriate, in the implementation of the Plan.