Filing # E-Filed 11/23/ :59:27 PM

Similar documents
Filing # E-Filed 09/14/ :37:55 PM

Defendant, Frank Avellino ( Avellino ), files this response to Plaintiff s Supplemental

PLAINTIFFS MOTION TO COMPEL DEFENDANT FRANK AVELLINO TO PRODUCE DOCUMENTS IN RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFFS THIRD REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION

NOTICE OF INTENT TO SERVE SUBPOENA UNDER RULE FOR PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS WITHOUT DEPOSITION

Filing # E-Filed 03/06/ :49:13 PM

Filing # E-Filed 03/11/ :10:57 PM

Filing # E-Filed 06/14/ :33:44 PM

DEFENDANTS FRANK AVELLINO AND MICHAEL BIENES REPLY IN SUPPORT OF THEIR JOINT MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFFS THIRD AMENDED COMPLAINT

Filing # E-Filed 10/24/ :07:49 PM

Filing # E-Filed 04/04/ :49:40 PM

PLAINTIFFS OBJECTION TO FRANK AVELLINO S NOTICE OF PRODUCTION TO NON-PARTY UNDER RULE 1.351

PLAINTIFFS RESPONSE AND MEMORANDA IN OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT FRANK AVELLINO S AND MICHAEL BIENES MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFFS THIRD AMENDED COMPLAINT

Filing # E-Filed 10/09/ :39:26 PM

DEFENDANT JAMES JUDD S NOTICE OF SERVING OBJECTIONS AND ANSWERS TO PLAINTIFFS FIRST SET OF INTERROGATORIES

Plaintiffs P & S Associates, General Partnership ( P&S ), S & P Associates, General

DEFENDANT, ROBERT A. UCHIN REVOCABLE TRUST'S, AMENDED RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFFS' FIRST REOUEST FOR PRODUCTION

DEFENDANTS JAMES AND VALERIE JUDD S SUPPLEMENTAL MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF THEIR PENDING MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

DEFENDANTS JAMES AND VALERIE JUDD S REPLY TO PLAINTIFFS RESPONSE TO MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

DEFENDANT ERSICA P. GIANNA S MOTION TO DISMISS, MOTION FOR DEFINITE STATEMENT, AND MOTION TO COMPEL ARBITRATION

DEFENDANTS JUDD S MOTION TO COMPEL AND RENEWED MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT. Preliminary Statement

PLAINTIFFS RESPONSE TO PARAGON VENTURES LIMITED MOTION TO SET ASIDE CLERK S ENTRY OF DEFAULT

Defendants. / DEFENDANT, ERSICA P. GIANNA S RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFFS SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEF

Defendants DALORES BARONE, CARL BOSCHETTI, DENISE B. BRYAN, and ETTOH, LTD. (collectively the Boschetti Defendants 1 ) through the

Filing # E-Filed 02/15/ :43:13 PM

PLAINTIFFS RESPONSE TO DEFENDANTS REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION. Pursuant to Fla. R. Civ. P , Plaintiffs P&S Associates, General Partnership

2. Green Tree is without knowledge of the allegations contained in Paragraph 2 of

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA. Case No.:

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA. Case No.: CIV-ALTONAGA/Turnoff

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA. Case No. 2:04-cv-47-FtM-29 SPC

Case 0:16-cv WPD Document 29 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/07/2017 Page 1 of 4

MARTIN COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS

MARTIN COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS

Case No. COMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY AND INJUNCTIVE RELIEF. Plaintiffs, MATTHEW CALDWELL and THE CAMPAIGN TO ELECT MATT

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO: SC BEVERLY ROGERS, et. al. v. THE ELECTIONS CANVASSING COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA, et al.

Case 1:16-cv DPG Document 509 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/06/2018 Page 1 of 9

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 17 TH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR BROWARD COUNTY, FLORIDA CASE NO (07) COMPLEX LITIGATION UNIT

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA THIRD DISTRICT CASE NOS. 3D D (Consolidated)

Case 1:11-mc MGC Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/07/2011 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

Case 9:14-cv DMM Document 118 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/17/2014 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

Case 1:97-cv DLG Document 243 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/11/2001 Page 1 of 12

Case 0:09-cv WPD Document 53 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/01/2011 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA. Case No.: CIV-SEITZ/MCALILEY

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

CASE NO DIVISION: 03

Case 1:12-cv MGC Document 155 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/13/2013 Page 1 of 8

Case 1:06-cv PCH Document 35 Filed 10/27/2006 Page 1 of 7

CIVIL DIVISION PLAINTIFF S NOTICE OF SERVICE OF 1 ST SET OF INTERROGATORIES TO DEFENDANT R. J. REYNOLDS TOBACCO COMPANY

Case EPK Doc 1019 Filed 03/06/15 Page 1 of 16

Case 0:18-cv WPD Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/26/2018 Page 1 of 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

Sealing & Expunging Records

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.: SC PRO-ART DENTAL LAB, INC., A Florida Corporation, Petitioner/Defendant,

Case 0:13-cv MGC Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/05/2013 Page 1 of 8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA. Case No. 2:04-cv-47-FtM-33SPC (LAG)

PLAINTIFFS SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT 2 AND DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL. Makovsky, and as Agent for Keith Makovsky, Kurt Makovsky, and William Makovsky, as

Case 1:16-cv RNS Document 24 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/16/2016 Page 1 of 5

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC ALEX BISTRICER, as limited partner of GULF ISLAND RESORT, L.P., and GULF ISLAND RESORT, L.P.

Case No. 3D Case No. 3D (consolidated under Case No. 3D ) IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL, THIRD DISTRICT STATE OF FLORIDA

Case 1:04-cv JLK Document 213 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/04/2007 Page 1 of 5

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR MARION COUNTY, FLORIDA. vs. Case No: ORDER ESTABLISHING MOTION PRACTICE PROCEDURE

Case 2:07-cv JES-SPC Document 477 Filed 09/09/11 Page 1 of 5 PageID 6214 UNITED STATED DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

RESPONDENT S ANSWER BRIEF

DIVISION OF ST. THOMAS/ ST. JOHN PLAINTIFF'S FIRST SET OF INTERROGATORIES TO DEFENDANT WAHEED HAMED

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC PALM BEACH COUNTY CANVASSING BOARD, Petitioner, vs.

FLORIDA SUPREME COURT. Case No.: SC nd DCA Case No.: 2D Lower Tribunal Case No.: G Hillsborough County, Florida Circuit Court

IN THE SUPREME COURT STATE OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC PRO-ART DENTAL LAB, INC. Petitioner, V-STRATEGIC GROUP, LLC. Respondent.

IN THE COURT OF THE QUAPAW TRIBE OF OKLAHOMA (THE O-GAH-PAH) ) In re Petition for Change of Name of: ) ) ) Petitioner. ) ) )

~'

Case LMI Doc 23 Filed 09/04/15 Page 1 of 10. UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Miami Division

STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION DIVISION OF FLORIDA CONDOMINIUMS, TIMESHARES AND MOBILE HOMES SUMMARY FINAL ORDER

Case 1:16-cv DPG Document 318 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/20/2017 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Miami Division CASE NO CIV-SIMONTON

STATE OF FLORIDA BOARD OF MEDICINE VS. DOH CASE NO.: LICENSE NO.: ME FINAL ORDER

Case 9:18-cv RLR Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/14/2018 Page 1 of 8

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC INQUIRY CONCERNING A JUDGE No LAURA M. WATSON

Case 9:16-cv RLR Document 198 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/03/2017 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

Filing # E-Filed 11/10/ :27:26 PM

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA FORT LAUDERDALE DIVISION CASE NO.: 11-CV WPD

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC

NOTICE OF PRODUCTION FROM NONPARTY. YOU ARE NOTIFIED that, after ten (10) days from the date of service of this notice, if

BEFORE THE JUDICIAL QUALIFICATIONS COMMISSION STATE OF FLORIDA JUDGE ALEMAN S AMENDED WITNESS LIST (PLEASE SEE PAGE 6.

FROM THE KORTE WARTMAN LAW FIRM. Page: 1 IN THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT COURT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA CASE NO CA (AW)

COUNTY COURT JUDGE GIUSEPPINA MIRANDA PROCEDURES FOR DIVISION 52. (Amended May 1, 2017)

Notice Of Interrogatories

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NOS.: SC , SC & SC PALM BEACH COUNTY vs. KATHERINE HARRIS, ET CANVASSING BOARD

PLAINTIFFS AMENDED NOTICE OF TAKING DEPOSITION OF DEFENDANT CONGREGATION OF THE HOLY GHOST WESTERN PROVINCE. Deponent Date Time

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC HARVEY JAY WEINBERG and KENNETH ALAN WEINBERG,

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO CIV-KING/O SULLIVAN

Case AJC Doc 28 Filed 08/29/16 Page 1 of 4 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA MIAMI DIVISION

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA

Case 1:16-cv FAM Document 13 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/12/2016 Page 1 of 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

Case AJC Doc 250 Filed 10/17/18 Page 1 of 3. UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA MIAMI DVISION

Case 0:18-cv FAM Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/19/2018 Page 1 of 5

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC CLEO LECROY, Petitioner, vs. STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondent.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.: CIV-KING/O SULLIVAN

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA RESPONSE TO COMMENTS OF HONORABLE PETER D. WEBSTER TO PROPOSED AMENDMENT TO RULE 1.420

Filing # E-Filed 08/28/ :22:03 PM

SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA Case No. SC07-434

INSTRUCTION SHEET. Please be sure to read the following information before you fill out the attached affidavit complaint form:

PLAINTIFFS MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE AN AMENDED COMPLAINT. Pursuant to Fla. R. Civ. P (a), Plaintiffs P & S Associates, General Partnership

Transcription:

Filing # 34781997 E-Filed 11/23/2015 02:59:27 PM IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 17TH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT OF FLORIDA, IN AND FOR BROWARD COUNTY CASE NO.: 12-034123 (07) P&S ASSOCIATES, GENERAL PARTNERSHIP, etc., et al., v. Plaintiffs, MICHAEL D. SULLIVAN, et al., Defendants. DEFENDANT FRANK AVELLINO'S EXPEDITED' MOTION TO COMPEL PLAINTIFFS TO ANSWER FIFTH SET OF INTERROGATORIES Defendant, Frank Avellino, by and through his undersigned counsel, and files this Motion to Compel Plaintiffs to Answer the Fifth Set of Interrogatories and as grounds therefore states as follows: 1. On January 19, 2015, Defendant filed an Amended Motion for Leave to Serve Additional Interrogatories pursuant to Fla.R.Civ.P. 1.340(a) because the earlier interrogatories served by Defendant were addressed to earlier versions of Plaintiffs' Complaint, and Plaintiffs had recently served their Fifth Amended Complaint on January 9, 2015.2 2. On May 4, 2015, this Court entered an Order granting Defendant's Amended Motion and permitting Defendant to serve an additional twenty interrogatories. A copy of the Order is attached as Exhibit "A".3 1 Defendant requests that the Court consider this motion on an expedited basis to allow Defendant time to receive evidence prior to the upcoming trial in this action. 2 A previous Motion for Leave to Serve Additional Interrogatories was served on November 19, 2014 but was not heard. 3 At the time of the Court's Order Defendant had issued 28 interrogatories, so he still had 2 interrogatories in addition to the additional 20 granted by the court. A435.001/00376215 vl

3. Pursuant to this Court's Order, Defendant served his Fourth Set of Interrogatories on July 31, 2015, which included 16 interrogatories, which meant Defendant had six remaining interrogatories to propound. A copy of the Fourth Set of Interrogatories is attached hereto as Exhibit "B". 4. On October 21, 2015, Defendant propounded four interrogatories in his Fifth Set of Interrogatories. A copy of the Fifth Set of Interrogatories is attached hereto as Exhibit "C". 5. Predictably, Plaintiffs waited until the last day to respond, which was not an answer, but rather, an objection alleging the interrogatories exceeded the number allowed by the Florida Rules of Civil Procedure and this Court's Order. According to Plaintiffs, Defendant's Fourth Set of Interrogatories contained 24 interrogatories, which was more than allowed by the Court's Order, and thus, Defendant cannot serve the Fifth Set of Interrogatories.4 6. An interrogatory, with subparts, is considered one interrogatory, if the subparts seek to elicit details concerning a common theme and are logically or factually subsumed within and necessarily related to the primary question. Ingole v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's of London, 2009 WL 1211359 (M.D. Fla. 2009). 7. In the instant case, the subparts to the 16 interrogatories propounded in the Fourth Set of Interrogatories are logically and factually subsumed within the primary questions, and concern a common theme, and thus, contrary to Plaintiffs' argument do not exceed the 20 interrogatories allowed by this Court. Defendant had six interrogatories left to propound; the Fifth Set of Interrogatories contains but two interrogatories. 8. Not only did Defendant conform to the proper amount of interrogatories allowed by the Court, but the interrogatories propounded in the Fifth Set of Interrogatories seek the 4 Inexplicably Plaintiffs did not raise this objection to the Fourth Set of Interrogatories; but, rather, answered the Interrogatories. A435.001/00376215 vl 2

infoiiiiation related to Plaintiffs' claim of damages, which is clearly an important issue in this matter. There is no compelling reason why Plaintiffs, so close to a trial date, should not be compelled to provide relevant information regarding damages they are seeking, which they have failed to do and throughout this action. 9. Assuming arguendo this Court agrees with Plaintiffs that the Fifth Set of Interrogatories exceeds the number of interrogatories allowed by the Court, Defendant would respectfully request this Court to deem this Motion to Compel, a request to exceed the allotted interrogatories. Plaintiffs should be compelled to provide answers, not objections, within ten days. Plaintiffs have failed throughout this action to articulate the damages sought; they should be required to do so. WHEREFORE Defendant Frank Avellino respectfully requests this Court to enter an Order compelling Plaintiffs to serve answers to the Fifth Set of Interrogatories within ten days. HAILE, SHAW & PFAFFENBERGER, P.A. Attorneys for Defendant 660 U.S. Highway One, Third Floor North Palm Beach, FL 33408 Phone: (561) 627-8100 Fax: (561) 622-7603 gwoodfield@haileshaw.com bpetroni@haileshaw.com syoffee@haileshaw.coin cmarino@haileshaw.com By: /s/ Gary A. Woodfield Gary A. Woodfield, Esq. Florida Bar No. 563102 Susan Yoffee, Esq. Florida Bar No. 511919 A435.001/00376215 vl

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I HEREBY CERTIFY that on this 23rd day of November, 2015, the foregoing document is being served on those on the attached service list by electronic service via the Florida Court E- Filing Portal in compliance with Fla. Admin Order No. 13-49. : /s/ Gary A. Woodfield Gary A. Woodfield, Esq. Florida Bar No. 563102 A435.001/00376215 vl 4

SERVICE LIST THOMAS M. MESSANA, ESQ. MESSANA, P.A. SUITE 1400, 401 EAST LAS OLAS BOULEVARD FORT LAUDERDALE, FL 33301 tmessana@messana-law. corn Attorneys for P & S Associates General Partnership LEONARD K. SAMUELS, ESQ. ETHAN MARK, ESQ. STEVEN D. WEBER, ESQ. BERGER SIGNERMAN 350 EAST LAS OLAS BOULEVARD, STE 1000 FORT LAUDERDALE, FL 33301 emark!,bergersingerman.com lsamuels@bergersingerman.com sweber@bergersingerman.com Attorneys for Plaintiff PETER G. HERMAN, ESQ. TRIPP SCOTT, P.A. 15TH FLOOR 110 SE 6TH STREET FORT LAUDERDALE, FL 33301 pgh@trippscott.corn elegtrippscott.corn Attorneys for Defendants Steven F. Jacob and Steven F. Jacob CPA & Associates, Inc. JONATHAN ETRA, ESQ. MARK F. RAYMOND, ESQ. SHANE MARTIN, ESQ. CHRISTOPHER CAVALLO, ESQ. BROAD AND CASSEL One Biscayne Tower, 21st Floor 2 South Biscayne Blvd. Miami, FL 33131 mraymond@broadandcassel.com ssmith!,broadandcassel. corn ccavallo@broadandcassel.com jetra@broadandcassel.com smartin@broadandcassel.com msanchez@broadandcassel.com Attorneys for Michael Bienes A435.001/00376215 vl 5

*:FILE;D: BROWARD:QOUNTk. FL Howard 'C. Forman..CLERK 514/20.15 4:27:57 FM,"" THE CIRCUfT,COURT OF THE 17TH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT OF FLORIDA. IN AND FOR BROWARD COU14P1.CASE NO,: 12,034123 (07) P&S ASSOCIATES; GENERA L PARTNERS,etc.; et al, COMPLEX LITIGATION UNIT Plaintiffg, v. HAELD. SULLIVAN,: et al, Defendanig. ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT FRAM( AVELLINO'S MOTION FOR 'NAVE TO. ELLE ADDITIONAL INTERROGATOREM $ CAUSE came.befere ihe Court-ori April 23, 201-5 en Defendant's Frank AvellinO's Mofibn for LetiVe'tO File Additional triten.ogatori; Od the Court has*1 earl th0 aritilvept c4unsel and being otherwise_ advised in the premises, it is hereby Plaintiffs. ORDERED and ADJUDGED as, follows.: The Motion is GRANTED, Defendant Frank Avant:to may serve. an additional twenty (20) interrogatories to DONE.AND ORDERED in Chambers at. Ft, Landerdale,, BrowM-d County, Florida this day of, 2013, Confortned:eopies to: Attorneys Of.R.eoord The Honorable Jaek:Tmet CIRCUIT JUDGE Electronically 000 t Ige Tuter,.).46k On 2015/04/30 15:33:4 EST_

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 17TH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR BROWARD COUNTY, FLORIDA CASE NO. 12-034123 (07) Complex Litigation Unit PHILIP J. VON KAHLE, as Conservator of P&S Associates General Partnership and S&P Associates, General Partnership, vs. Plaintiffs, MICHAEL D. SULLIVAN, et al., Defendants. DEFENDANT FRANK AVELLINO'S NOTICE OF SERVING FOURTH SET OF INTERROGATORIES TO PLAINTIFF Defendant, Frank Avellino, by and through his undersigned counsel, hereby gives notice of serving his Fourth Set of Interrogatories upon Plaintiff, Philip J. Von Kahle, as Conservator of P&S Associates, General Partnership and S&P Associates, General Partnership, to be answered under oath and in writing, within thirty (30) days of service herein, in accordance with the Florida Rules of Civil Procedure 1.340. A435.001/00353307 v2 A435.001/00353307 vl

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I HEREBY CERTIFY that on this 31st day of July, 2015, the foregoing document is being served on all counsel of record on the attached service list by email, and by email and facsimile to Thomas M. Messana, Esq., Messana, P.A., Suite 1400, 401 E Las Olas Blvd., Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301 and Leonard K. Samuels, Esq., Ethan Mark, Esq., and Steven D. Weber, Esq., Berger Signerman, 350 E Las Olas Blvd., Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301. HAILE, SHAW & PFAFFENBERGER, P.A. Attorneys for Defendant Frank Avellino 660 U.S. Highway One, Third Floor North Palm Beach, FL 33408 Phone: (561) 627-8100 Fax: (561) 622-7603 gwoodfield@haileshaw.com bpetroni@haileshaw.com eservices@haileshaw.com By: /s/ Gary A. Woodfield Gary A. Woodfield, Esq. Florida Bar No. 563102 A435.001/00353307 v2 2

SERVICE LIST THOMAS M. MESSANA, ESQ. MESSANA, P.A. SUITE 1400, 401 EAST LAS OLAS BOULEVARD FORT LAUDERDALE, FL 33301 tmessana@messana-law.com Attorneys for P & S Associates General Partnership LEONARD K. SAMUELS, ESQ. ETHAN MARK, ESQ. STEVEN D. WEBER, ESQ. BERGER SIGNERMAN 350 EAST LAS OLAS BOULEVARD, SUITE 1000 FORT LAUDERDALE, FL 33301 emark@bergersingerman.com lsamuels@bergersingerman.com sweber@bergersingerman.com Attorneys for Plaintiff PETER G. HERMAN, ESQ. TRIPP SCOTT, P.A. 15TH FLOOR 110 SE 6TH STREET FORT LAUDERDALE, FL 33301 pgh@trippscott.com Attorneys for Defendants Steven F. Jacob and Steven F. Jacob CPA & Associates, Inc. JONATHAN ETRA, ESQ. MARK F. RAYMOND, ESQ. SHANE MARTIN, ESQ. CHRISTOPHER CAVALLO, ESQ. BROAD AND CASSEL One Biscayne Tower, 21st Floor 2 South Biscayne Blvd. Miami, FL 33131 mraymond@broadandcassel.com ssmith@broadandcassel.com ccavallo@broadandcassel.com jetra@broadandcassel.com msouza@broadandcassel.com smartin@broadandcassel.com msanchez@broadandcassel.com Attorneys _for Michael Bienes A435.001/00353307 v2

DEFINITIONS 1. "Partnerships" shall mean P& S Associates, General Partnership and S &P Associates, General Partnership, their general and limited partners, members and representatives and agents. 2. "You" or "your" shall mean Plaintiffs and their partners, associates, members and representatives and agents. 3. "Avellino" shall mean Frank Avellino. 4. "Sullivan" shall mean Michael D. Sullivan. 5. To "identify" a person means to provide the following information: (a) the person's full name; (b) the person's present or last known residence address and telephone number; (c) the person's present or last known business affiliation and job title; and (d) the person's present or last known employment address and telephone number. INSTRUCTIONS 1. Plaintiff shall quote each interrogatory in full immediately preceding the statement of any answer, response, or objection thereto. 2. Each interrogatory is to be answered separately and in full in writing under oath, unless all portions of an interrogatory are in good faith objected to, in which event the reasons for all of Plaintiffs objections shall be stated in detail. If an objection pertains to only a portion of an interrogatory, or to a word, phrase, or clause contained within such interrogatory, Plaintiff shall state their objection to that portion, and shall answer the interrogatory to the extent it is not objectionable. 3. Plaintiff is requested to furnish all information available to him, his attorneys, accountants, investigators, representatives, agents or any other person acting on Plaintiffs behalf and not merely such information as is known by Plaintiffs own personal knowledge. If Plaintiff cannot answer or respond in full after exercising due diligence to secure the information, he should answer or respond, to the extent possible, specifying the reason or reasons for the inability to answer or respond to the remainder. 4. Any recipient of these interrogatories who withholds any requested information by reason of a claim of privilege or attorney work product, or who objects to any part of these interrogatories, shall state the nature of the privilege or objection and provide sufficient A435.001/00353307 v2 4

information to permit a full determination of whether the claim or objection is proper. For any documents that are withheld, provide a list identifying each such document for which the claim of privilege is made or to which the objection relates, together with the following information: (i) the type of document, e.g., letter or memorandum, and any attachments; (ii) the subject matter of the document; (iii) the date of the document; (iv) the author(s) of the document, (v) the recipient(s) of document; (vi) number of pages; (v) the number of the interrogatory to which the document relates; (vi) the reason(s) for each objection or claim of privilege; and (vii) the identity of each person having knowledge of the actual basis, if any, on which the privilege or other ground for objection is based. A435.001/00353307 v2 5

INTERROGATORIES 1. Please identify all persons who have knowledge of the allegations contained in Plaintiffs' Fifth Amended Complaint. For each person identified, please set forth the substance of their knowledge. 2. Please identify all persons who have knowledge of Plaintiffs' allegations that Avellino received assets of the Partnerships and/or commissions as alleged in paragraph 37 of the Fifth Amended Complaint and for each person identified please set forth the substance of their knowledge. 3. Please identify all persons who have knowledge of Plaintiffs' allegations that Avellino was a co-conspirator with Sullivan and others, and for each person identified please set forth the substance of their knowledge. A435.001/00353307 v2 6

4. Please identify all persons who have knowledge of Plaintiffs' allegations that Avellino knew that distributions were being improperly made to Partners and other third parties, but did nothing to prevent it and for each person identified please set forth the substance of their knowledge. 5. Please identify all persons who have knowledge of Plaintiffs' allegations in paragraphs 32 through 36 of the Fifth Amended Complaint and for each person identified please set forth the substance of their knowledge. 6. Please identify all persons who have knowledge of Plaintiffs' allegations in paragraphs 42 and 43 of the Fifth Amended Complaint and for each person identified please set forth the substance of their knowledge. A435.001/00353307 v2 7

7. Please identify all persons who have knowledge of the alleged "kickbacks" in paragraph 46 of the Fifth Amended Complaint and for each person identified please set forth the substance of their knowledge. 8. Please identify all persons who have knowledge of the allegations in paragraph 50 of the Fifth Amended Complaint and for each person identified please set forth the substance of their knowledge. 9. Please set forth all facts which support your contention that the doctrine of delayed discovery is applicable to extend the applicable statute of limitations to the causes of action raised in the Fifth Amended Complaint. A435.001/00353307 v2 8

10. Please identify all persons who have knowledge of the facts set forth in your answer to Question Number 9. 11. Please set forth all facts which support your contention that the doctrine of equitable estoppel is applicable to extend the applicable statute of limitations to the causes of action raised in the Fifth Amended Complaint, including without limitation, all actions or conduct by Avellino which prevented and/or delayed you from filing a lawsuit. 12. Please identify all persons who have knowledge of the facts set forth in your answer to Question Number 11. A435.001/00353307 v2 9

13. Please set forth all facts which support your contention that continuing torts is applicable to extend the applicable statute of limitations to the causes of action raised in the Fifth Amended Complaint, including without limitation, all tortious acts committed by Avellino after 2008 which cause damages to you. 14. Please identify all persons who have knowledge of the facts set forth in your answer to Question Number 13. 15. Please set forth all facts which support your contention that the causes of action raised in the Fifth Amended Complaint are not barred by the applicable statute of limitations. A435.001/00353307 v2 10

16. Please identify all persons who have knowledge of the facts set forth in your answer to Question Number 15. A435.001/00353307 v2 11

P&S ASSOCIATES, GENERAL PARTNERSHIP By: PHILIP J. VON KAHLE, as Conservator STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF Sworn to or affirmed and signed before me this day of, 2015 by Philip J. Von Kahle, as Conservator of P&S Associates, General Partnership, to me known to be the person and/or who provided identification consisting of and who executed the foregoing instrument this day of, 2015. (SEAL) NOTARY PUBLIC My Commission Expires: S&P ASSOCIATES, GENERAL PARTNERSHIP By: PHILIP J. VON KAHLE, as Conservator STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF Sworn to or affirmed and signed before me this day of, 2015 by Philip J. Von Kahle, as Conservator of S&P Associates, General Partnership, to me known to be the person and/or who provided identification consisting of and who executed the foregoing instrument this day of, 2015. (SEAL) NOTARY PUBLIC My Commission Expires: A435.001/00353307 v2 12

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 17TH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR BROWARD COUNTY, FLORIDA CASE NO. 12-034123 (07) Complex Litigation Unit PHILIP J. VON KAHLE, as Conservator of P&S Associates General Partnership and S&P Associates, General Partnership, vs. Plaintiffs, MICHAEL D. SULLIVAN, et al., Defendants. DEFENDANT FRANK AVELLINO'S NOTICE OF SERVING FIFTH SET OF INTERROGATORIES TO PLAINTIFF Defendant, Frank Avellino, by and through his undersigned counsel, hereby gives notice of serving his Fifth Set of Interrogatories upon Plaintiff, Philip J. Von Kahle, as Conservator of P&S Associates, General Partnership and S&P Associates, General Partnership, to be answered under oath and in writing, within thirty (30) days of service herein, in accordance with the Florida Rules of Civil Procedure 1.340. I HEREBY CERTIFY that on this 21st day of October, 2015, the foregoing document and Fifth Set of Interrogatories are being served on all counsel of record on the attached service list by email and by facsimile to Counsel for Plaintiff, 7401 and Leonard K. Samuels, Esq., and Steven D. Weber, Esq. at 954 712-5138. A435.001/00369969 v I

HAILE, SHAW & PFAFFENBERGER, P.A. Attorneys for Defendant Frank Avellino 660 U.S. Highway One, Third Floor North Palm Beach, FL 33408 Phone: (561) 627-8100 gwoodfield@haileshaw.com bpetroni@haileshaw.com By: /s/ Gary A. Woodfield Gary A. Woodfield, Esq. Florida Bar No. 563102 A435.001/00369969 vl 2

SERVICE LIST THOMAS M. MESSANA, ESQ. MESSANA, P.A. SUITE 1400, 401 EAST LAS OLAS BOULEVARD FORT LAUDERDALE, FL 33301 tmessana@messana-law.com Attorneys for P & S Associates General Partnership LEONARD K. SAMUELS, ESQ. ETHAN MARK, ESQ. STEVEN D. WEBER, ESQ. BERGER SIGNERMAN 350 EAST LAS OLAS BOULEVARD, SUITE 1000 FORT LAUDERDALE, FL 33301 emark@,bergersingerman.com lsamuels@bergersingerman.com sweber@bergersingerman.com Attorneys for Plaintiff PETER G. HERMAN, ESQ. TRIPP SCOTT, P.A. 15TH FLOOR 110 SE 6TH STREET FORT LAUDERDALE, FL 33301 ngh@triopscott.com Attorneys for Defendants Steven F. Jacob and Steven F. Jacob CPA & Associates, Inc. JONATHAN ETRA, ESQ. MARK F. RAYMOND, ESQ. SHANE MARTIN, ESQ. CHRISTOPHER CAVALLO, ESQ. BROAD AND CASSEL One Biscayne Tower, 21st Floor 2 South Biscayne Blvd. Miami, FL 33131 mraymond@broadandcassel.com ssmith@,broadandcassel.com ccavallo@broadandcassel.com ietra@broadandcassel.com msouza@,broadandcassel.com smartin@broadandcassel.com msanchez@,broadandcassel.com Attorneys for Michael Bienes A435.001/00369969 vl

DEFINITIONS 1. "You" or "your" shall mean Plaintiffs and their partners, associates, members and representatives and agents. INSTRUCTIONS 1. Plaintiff shall quote each interrogatory in full immediately preceding the statement of any answer, response, or objection thereto. 2. Each interrogatory is to be answered separately and in full in writing under oath, unless all portions of an interrogatory are in good faith objected to, in which event the reasons for all of Plaintiff's objections shall be stated in detail. If an objection pertains to only a portion of an interrogatory, or to a word, phrase, or clause contained within such interrogatory, Plaintiff shall state their objection to that portion, and shall answer the interrogatory to the extent it is not objectionable. 3. Plaintiff is requested to furnish all information available to him, his attorneys, accountants, investigators, representatives, agents or any other person acting on Plaintiff's behalf and not merely such information as is known by Plaintiff's own personal knowledge. If Plaintiff cannot answer or respond in full after exercising due diligence to secure the information, he should answer or respond, to the extent possible, specifying the reason or reasons for the inability to answer or respond to the remainder. 4. Any recipient of these interrogatories who withholds any requested information by reason of a claim of privilege or attorney work product, or who objects to any part of these interrogatories, shall state the nature of the privilege or objection and provide sufficient information to permit a full determination of whether the claim or objection is proper. For any documents that are withheld, provide a list identifying each such document for which the claim of privilege is made or to which the objection relates, together with the following information: (i) the type of document, e.g., letter or memorandum, and any attachments; (ii) the subject A435.00I/00369969 vl 4

matter of the document; (iii) the date of the document; (iv) the author(s) of the document, (v) the recipient(s) of document; (vi) number of pages; (v) the number of the interrogatory to which the document relates; (vi) the reason(s) for each objection or claim of privilege; and (vii) the identity of each person having knowledge of the actual basis, if any, on which the privilege or other ground for objection is based. A435.00I/00369969 vl 5

INTERROGATORIES 1. Please specifically delineate the amount of damages as to each defendant you are seeking for each cause of action (Counts I through VII) in the Fifth Amended Complaint, including the specific components of the damages for each cause of action (Count I through VII), and specifically how each damage delineated was calculated. 2. Please identify all persons who have answered and/or contributed to the answers to Interrogatory Number 1, and specify what portions each answered and/or contributed to. A435.001/00369969 vl 6