NILE RIVER BASIN 1. Water Event Intensity Scale 2. Power relations: Hegemony and Counter- Hegemony
WATER EVENT INTENSITY SCALE BAR SCALE 7 Voluntary unification into one nation EVENT DESCRIPTION 6 International Freshwater Treaty or Major strategic alliance (regional or international) 5 Military economic or strategic support 4 Non-military economic, technological or industrial agreement 3 Cultural or scientific agreement or support (non-strategic) 2 Official verbal support of goals, values, or regime 1 Minor official exchanges, talks or policy expressions--mild verbal support 0 Neutral or non-significant acts for the inter-nation situation -1 Mild verbal expressions displaying discord in interaction -2 Strong verbal expressions displaying hostility in interaction -3 Diplomatic-economic hostile actions -4 Political-military hostile actions -5 Small scale military acts -6 Extensive War Acts causing deaths, dislocation or high strategic cost -7 Formal Declaration of War Source: Wolf et al, 2003
WATER EVENT INTENSITY SCALE Insights Limitations Identification of historic events and interactions Water as the Driver of the Event Water-related Events ranked by INTENSITY and NATURE Clear definition of conflict and cooperation different levels of Intensity Visualisation of Trends and Patterns Analysis Across riparian states Analysis Across the time SCALE Spectrum of events ranked by intensity (Wolf et., 2002) Excessive quantitative focus extrapolation of conclusions Focus not in Power relations Scale does not include Intranational events TFDD All water treaties are coded at the same level of intensity of cooperation
BAR Scale Nile Basin (1945-2004) Bar Scale 7 Conflict/Cooperation on the Nile 6 1959 Agr eement f or Ful l Utilization of the Nile Waters - Egypt/ Sudan End of Cold War NBI 5 4 3 2 OAU Conver si on of the Col d War al i gnments i n the Ni l e Basin Nile-TAC Nile-SEC 1 0 194 194 194 194 194 194 195 195 195 195 195 195 195 195 195 195 196 196 196 196 196 196 196 196 196 196 197 197 197 197 197 197 197 197 197 197 198 198 198 198 198 198 198 198 198 198 199 199 199 199 199 199 199 199 199 199 200 200 200 200 200 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4-1 -2 Golf War -3-4 -5 Suez Crisis Ogaden War Assassi nation attempt -6 Israel attacks Nile water s i n Egypt of Pr esi dent Mubar ak i n Addi s Abeba Egypt/Ethiopia -7 Dates Ethiopia/Sudan Nile Basin Egypt/Sudan
BAR Scale Nile Basin (1945-2004) Ethiopia-Egypt Bar Scale 7 6 5 4 3 2 1959 Agreement for Full Utilization of the Nile Waters - Egypt/Sudan OAU Conversion of the Cold War alignments in the Nile Basin End of Cold War Nile-TAC NBI Nile-SEC 1 0-1 194 194 4 5 194 194 6 7 194 8 194 195 9 0 195 1 195 195 2 3 195 195 4 5 195 6 195 195 7 8 195 196 9 0 196 1 196 196 2 3 196 4 196 196 5 6 196 196 7 8 196 9 197 197 0 1 197 2 197 197 3 4 197 197 5 6 197 7 197 197 8 9 198 198 0 1 198 2 198 198 3 4 198 5 198 198 6 7 198 198 8 9 199 0 199 199 1 2 199 199 3 4 199 5 199 199 6 7 199 8 199 200 9 0 200 200 1 2 200 200 3 4-2 Golf War -3-4 -5-6 -7 Suez Crisis Israel ataca águas do Nilo, no Egipto Ogaden War Dates Assassination sttempt of President M ubarak in Addis Abeba Egypt/Ethiopia Ethiopia/Sudan Nile Basin Egypt/Sudan
NILE Power relations Downstream Egypt the downstream Hegemon Stable Control of Nile waters Methods: hydraulic mission, securitisation, knowledge construction, sanctioned discourse, etc. Accumulation of Power Hegemony Goal: Status quo LEADERSHIP LEGITIMACY IDEAS CONSENT Gramsci, 1971
NILE Power relations Upstream Upstream no mobilisation of resources Historical consent to Hegemony Ethiopia incapacity Sudan unwillingness White Nile wait-and-see Ethiopia the silent partner in the Nile? From Consent to Contest
When there is hegemony, there is always a locus for counter-hegemony (Warner, 2000) War of position War of position (Gramsci, 1971)
ETHIOPIA Challenges to Hegemony Inverted Triangle How to challenge Hydro-Hegemony? Tactics Strategies Reactive and Active Diplomacy Desecuritisation Reinforced cooperation Financial mobilisation Political feasibility Knowledge/expertise construction Discourse alternatives Claim for legal principles Needs-approach Water infrastructures construction Economic and SH institutional development Social and political adaptive capacities Goal SHARED CONTROL
COUNTER-HEGEMONIC TACTICS Political feasibility central tactic Diplomacy Letters of protest, participation in conferences and forums, transnational lobby campaigns, grasp international support Desecuritisation institutional arrangements, capacity and confidence-building, changing perceptions, water regimes Regimes begin at home (Waterbury, 2002)
COUNTER-HEGEMONIC TACTICS Reinforced Cooperation (NBI) constructive shared control, win-win outcomes, watchdog to avoid domination International financial commitment multilateral and regional banks, mix publicprivate, incremental mix, NBI Knowledge/expertise improve expertise, create knowledge, accurate information, dissemination, public debates (interests groups)
COUNTER-HEGEMONIC TACTICS Discourse alternatives deligitimise sanctioned discourse and belief systems, emphasis on new knowledge, prevent areas of ignorance Legal principles focus on equitable use, refutation of 1959 Agreement, D3 Project Rights approach Rights approach move from a rights-based perspective to needs-based approach (Wolf, 1999), clear definition of needs
CONCLUSION Challenge the status quo 90s new context Nile Basin Initiative Ongoing cooperation process Goal: Shared control Political momentum