Written materials by Jonathan D. Sasser

Similar documents
EVIDENCE, FOUNDATIONS AND OBJECTIONS. Laurie Vahey, Esq.

RULES OF EVIDENCE LEGAL STANDARDS

Demonstrative Evidence

THE NATIONAL CENTER FOR JUSTICE AND

DEMONSTRATIVE EVIDENCE UNDER THE RULES: THE ADMISSABLE AND INADMISSABLE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Adding a Little Bit of Hollywood to Your Trial

Case 3:01-cv AWT Document 143 Filed 03/26/2008 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT : : : : : : :

Presenters 10/13/2015. Effective Use of Evidence and Expert Witnesses in Immigration Court

Essentials of Demonstrative Evidence

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

How to Testify. Qualifications for Testimony. Hugo A. Holland, Jr., J.D., CFE Prosecutor, State of Louisiana

Trial of a Defendant s Product Liability Case. In product liability cases, direct and cross-examination of expert witnesses can be the

Keith Berkshire Berkshire Law Office, PLLC

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Domestic Violence Advocates as Expert Witnesses

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA LAKE CHARLES DIVISION * * * * * * * * *

E. Expert Testimony Issue. 1. Defendants may assert that before any photographs or video evidence from a camera

Evidence Presented by: Ervin Gonzalez, Esq.

STATE'S SUPPLEMENTAL MOTION IN LIMINE REGARDING COMPUTER ANIMATION

Qualifications, Presentation and Challenges to Expert Testimony - Daubert (i.e. is a DFPS caseworker an expert)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI ST. JOSEPH DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA

NOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION. No. 114,985 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF KANSAS. STATE OF KANSAS, Appellee,

COMMON OBJECTIONS CHART (excluding Hearsay, covered in next section)

Case 2:11-cv RBS -DEM Document 94 Filed 10/31/12 Page 1 of 6 PageID# 2118

J. L. Perez and Jeffrey D. Deen, Regional Counsel, Office of Criminal Conflict and Civil Regional Counsel, for Appellant.

Drug Chemistry Essentials: Importance of Standardized Forensic Methods for the Analysis of Seized Drugs A Legal Perspective

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA

AARONSON RAPPAPORT FEINSTEIN & DEUTSCH, LLP ATTORNEYS AT LAW 600 THIRD AVENUE, NEW YORK, N.Y Luc:

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA. No. COA Filed: 7 July Appeal by defendant from judgments entered 7 May 2014 by Judge W.

Antithetical Antics: New and Unusual Tactics from the Plaintiff's Bar

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELA WARE MEMORANDUM ORDER

FEDERAL RULES OF EVIDENCE 2018

Court granted Defendants motion in limine to preclude the testimony of Plaintiffs damages

TIPS ON OFFERING EVIDENCE RELEVANCE

Admissibility of Electronic Evidence

COMMON OBJECTIONS CHART (excluding Hearsay, covered in next section)

STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS

Before HATCHETT, Chief Judge, HULL, Circuit Judge, and MOORE *, District Judge.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case 3:06-cv TMR Document 167 Filed 08/28/2008 Page 1 of 18 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON

SIMPLIFIED RULES OF EVIDENCE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA INDIANAPOLIS DIVISION

FEDERAL RULES OF EVIDENCE 2019

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SAN ANTONIO DIVISION. Plaintiff, v. CIVIL ACTION NO.

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION AND ORDER ON PLAINTIFF S MOTION TO STRIKE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA CIVIL MINUTES GENERAL

Preparing and Trying Negligence Cases

Objections DEFINITIONS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION

Admissibility of Electronic Writings: Some Questions and Answers*

Case 1:15-cv JCH-LF Document 60 Filed 11/04/16 Page 1 of 13 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO

ENTRY ORDER SUPREME COURT DOCKET NO OCTOBER TERM, 2016

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

COUNTY. STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA ) ) MOTION TO EXCLUDE vs. ) TESTIMONY REGARDING ) FIELD SOBRIETY TESTS, ) Defendant. ) I.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Judge Raymond P. Moore

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA * * * ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

The Most Common Foundations for Exhibits Francis J. Carney

INTRODUCTION OF EXHIBITS AT TRIAL THE BASICS

Case: 2:16-cv CDP Doc. #: 162 Filed: 12/03/18 Page: 1 of 5 PageID #: 8273

Kumho Tire Co., Ltd. v. Carmichael. Case Background

AUTHENTICATION AND ORIGINAL WRITINGS

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS WICHITA FALLS DIVISION. v. CIVIL ACTION NO. 7:09-CV-29-O ORDER

ARKANSAS COURT OF APPEALS

STATE OF ARIZONA, Appellee, SAMUEL BRETT WESLEY BASSETT, Appellant. No. 1 CA-CR

Case 1:06-cv Document 695 Filed 02/23/10 Page 1 of 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. Plaintiffs,

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE RICHARD F. STOKES 1 THE CIRCLE, SUITE 2 JUDGE SUSSEX COUNTY CO URTH OUSE GEORGETOWN, DE 19947

Web 2.0 to the Rescue Using the Internet to Bolster Your Defense

Case 1:14-cv TSC Document 108 Filed 03/21/16 Page 1 of 116

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY OWENSBORO DIVISION. TRANSPORTATION SERVICES, INC. et al.

FEDERAL RULES OF EVIDENCE (Mock Trial Version)

) Cause No. 1:14-cv-937-WTL-DML. motions are fully briefed and the Court, being duly advised, resolves them as set forth below.

Maximizing Technology in the Courtroom and the Law Office

E-Discovery Best Practices: Admissibility

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

2016 FEDERAL RULES OF EVIDENCE (Mock Trial Version)

California Bar Examination

THE USE OF EXPERT TESTIMONY AT TRIAL

James McNamara v. Kmart Corp

ONTARIO SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE. ) ) Plaintiff ) ) ) Defendants RULING RE: ADMISSION OF EXPERT EVIDENCE OF DR. FINKELSTEIN

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MONTANA BILLINGS DIVISION

COMMONWEALTH vs. SCOTT E. FIELDING. No. 18-P-342. Dukes. November 13, January 29, Present: Milkey, Henry, & Englander, JJ.

2:12-cr SFC-MKM Doc # 227 Filed 12/06/13 Pg 1 of 12 Pg ID 1213 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE IN AND FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ORDER. Defendant s Biomechanical Expert Witness

PlainSite. Legal Document. Missouri Eastern District Court Case No. 4:09-cv Jo Ann Howard and Associates, P.C. et al v.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

OF FLORIDA. On Petition for Writ of Certiorari to the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Charles D. Edelstein, Judge.

Case 1:09-cr GAO Document 276 Filed 10/03/11 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

STATE OF VERMONT PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITY BOARD

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE STATE OF OREGON FOR LAKE COUNTY. CASE No CR

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION

DORI SYOKOS, KONSTANTINA I. SYOKOS. Sip. DORINN SYOKOS, Third-Par Plaintiff. BRAKO BAJCER and DRAEN BAJCER

Case 1:15-cr NGG Document 62 Filed 01/11/16 Page 1 of 8 PageID #: 549 : :

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION ORDER

Case5:08-cv PSG Document498 Filed08/15/13 Page1 of 6

US Supreme Court. Texas Supreme Court and Court of Criminal Appeals. 5th Circuit Court of Appeals. 14 State Appellate Courts

Transcription:

Power Point Presentation By Rachel Scott Decker Ward Black Law 208 West Wendover Avenue Greensboro, North Carolina 27401 (336) 273-3812 www.wardblacklaw.com Written materials by Jonathan D. Sasser

Since seeing is believing, and demonstrative evidence appeals directly to the senses of the trier of fact, it is today universally felt that this kind of evidence possesses an immediacy and reality which endow it with particularly persuasive effect. 2 McCormick On Evidence 214

Real Evidence versus Demonstrative Evidence

Real evidence is that which is furnished by producing the thing itself for inspection instead of having it described by witnesses For example, a defective heater in a products liability case

Demonstrative evidence helps to demonstrate a concept or a witness s testimony For example, a drawing of a defective heater in a product s liability case

Types of Demonstrative Evidence X-rays Medical Illustrations Day in the Life Videos Before and After Photographs Maps Video Demonstrations

Practical Considerations Which exhibits have the greatest impact? How do you plan to use the exhibit? In examination? In argument? How can an expert witness help prepare the exhibit? Does this case warrant the financial costs associated with creating the exhibit? Who is going to prepare the exhibit? How is the exhibit going to get into evidence? Does the exhibit convey the intended message?

Admissibility of Demonstrative Evidence Rests in the trial court s discretion

Generally admissible where: Sufficiently explains or illustrates relevant testimony Supplements the witness s spoken testimony and clarifies case issues

Relevant Must establish that Authenticated evidence is: And where appropriate, an adequate foundation was laid for admissibility

Generally inadmissible where: Confuses the jury Raises collateral issues More prejudicial than probative

Will Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 509 U.S. 579 (1993) apply to the admissibility of demonstrative reenactment evidence used by my expert? Maybe

Can I get the demonstrative reenactment evidence in under Federal Rule 703 which allows introduction into evidence of inadmissible data if relied upon by the expert? Maybe

Experts Use of Illustrative Demonstrative Evidence

Evidence is not required to possess a high degree of similarity with actual events Hinkle v. City of Clarksburg, 81 F.3d 416 (4 th Cir. 1995) Gladhill v. General Motors Corp., 743 F.2d 1049 (4th Cir. 1984) Robinson v. Missouri Pacific Railroad Co., 16 F.3d 1083 (10th Cir. 1994)

What s the difference between reenactment and demonstrative evidence? Experiments that are meant to recreate the incident constitute reenactment evidence while experiments that illustrate theories or scientific principles are illustrative

Narrated Videos Raise hearsay problems Hearsay is not overcome by making the narrator or film person available for cross Video can be played without sound to overcome the objection

Samples of a substance to demonstrate condition, quality, or nature allowed if the sample: Is properly identified as to source Is in substantially the same condition as it was at the time the sample s condition became material to the issues Is fairly representative of the whole, where offered to show the condition of the substance as a whole

Foundation Requirements

Relevant and material It is what it purports to be In substantially the same condition as it was at time of incident

Charts, drawings, and photos Require a witness to lay a foundation that it is a substantially true, accurate, and faithful representation

Films and videos Require: a witness to lay a foundation that it depicts the events shown offering party to show that it is an accurate, faithful representation

Experiments and accident models Require offering party to demonstrate that the experiment was conducted under conditions that were similar to those that existed at the time of the incident

Summaries of Voluminous Evidence (Rule 1006) Permits admission of only summary into evidence if: Underlying documents are voluminous and not conveniently examinable in court Opposing party has had opportunity to examine the underlying documents The underlying documents would be admissible A witness familiar with information introduces the summary

Practical Considerations Regarding Questionable Exhibits

Prepare different versions of the exhibit in anticipation of objections Move In Limine to address admissibility issues Preview the exhibits at the pretrial conference to flush out objections Use an expert to admit the exhibit Consider the use of a limiting instruction