Evidence Presented by: Ervin Gonzalez, Esq.

Similar documents
Index. Adjudicative Facts Judicial notice, Administrative Rules Judicial notice,

LIST OF CHAPTERS. Joseph J. Mellon, Esq. Thomas J. Tomazin, Esq. Lorraine E. Parker, Esq. Lauren E. Sykes, Esq. Krista Maher, Esq.

Contents. Dedication... v. About the Author... xvii. Acknowledgments... xix. Foreword... xxi. Preface... xxv A Note about Primary Sources...

TRIAL OBJECTIONS. Considerations Effect on the jury Scrutinous Judiciously Effective/Disruptive

Keith Berkshire Berkshire Law Office, PLLC

Admissibility of Electronic Evidence

FEDERAL RULES OF EVIDENCE (Mock Trial Version)

Case Preparation and Presentation: A Guide for Arbitration Advocates and Arbitrators

EMPIRION EVIDENCE ORDINANCE

Hearsay Exceptions Rules 803 and 804

SIMPLIFIED RULES OF EVIDENCE

DELAWARE HIGH SCHOOL MOCK TRIAL RULES OF EVIDENCE

RULES OF EVIDENCE Pennsylvania Mock Trial Version 2003

FEDERAL RULES OF EVIDENCE (Mock Trial Version) (updated 10/07)

2011 RULES OF EVIDENCE

2016 FEDERAL RULES OF EVIDENCE (Mock Trial Version)

Why? Test Specific Knowledge Course Coverage Test Critical Reading Objective Grading

EVIDENCE, FOUNDATIONS AND OBJECTIONS. Laurie Vahey, Esq.

TIPS ON OFFERING EVIDENCE RELEVANCE

Oklahoma High School Mock Trial Program RULES OF EVIDENCE ARTICLE I. GENERAL PROVISIONS. Rule 101. Scope

Thinking Evidentially

COMMON OBJECTIONS CHART (excluding Hearsay, covered in next section)

Impeachment by omission. Impeachment for inconsistent statement. The Evidence Dance. Opening Statement Tip Twice

Federal Rules of Evidence ARTICLE I - GENERAL PROVISIONS

SUPPLEMENT TO MANUAL FOR COURTS-MARTIAL UNITED STATES MILITARY RULES OF EVIDENCE (2012 EDITION)

FEDERAL RULES OF EVIDENCE 2018

COMMON OBJECTIONS CHART (excluding Hearsay, covered in next section)

American Mock Trial Association MIDLANDS RULES OF EVIDENCE

Example: (1) Your honor, (2) I object (3) to that question (4) because it is a compound question.

GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF NORTH CAROLINA 1983 SESSION CHAPTER 701 HOUSE BILL 96 AN ACT TO SIMPLIFY AND CODIFY THE RULES OF EVIDENCE.

Federal Rules Of Evidence (2012)

Insight from Carlton Fields

MIDDLE SCHOOL MOCK TRIAL SIMPLIFIED RULES OF EVIDENCE

PRINCE GEORGE S COUNTY BAR ASSOCIATION LAW 101 March 1, 2012, 4:00p.m. Courtroom M1404 ASK A PROPER QUESTION - FACTUAL AND EXPERT WITNESSES

Insight from Carlton Fields Jorden Burt

How to Testify. Qualifications for Testimony. Hugo A. Holland, Jr., J.D., CFE Prosecutor, State of Louisiana

TRIAL ADVOCACY - FALL 2005

SIMULATED MBE ANALYSIS: EVIDENCE PROFESSOR ROBERT PUSHAW PEPPERDINE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF LAW

FRCP 30(b)(6) Notice or subpoena directed to entity to require designation of witness to testify on its behalf.

INTRODUCTION OF EXHIBITS AT TRIAL THE BASICS

Non-Scientific Expert Testimony in Child Abuse Trials

J. Max Wawrik Nancy Rosado Colon Law 16 Spring 2017

PART I INTRODUCTORY MATTERS AND TERMINOLOGY 1

CROSS AND TAPPER ON EVIDENCE

TAKING AND DEFENDING DEPOSITION September 26, :00-1:00 p.m. Presenter: Thomasina F. Moore, Esq.

TEXAS DISCOVERY. Brock C. Akers CHAPTER 1 LAW REVISIONS TO TEXAS RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE GOVERNING DISCOVERY

FEDERAL RULES OF EVIDENCE 2019

TOP TEN NEW EVIDENCE RULES

SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE (ONTARIO) PRE-TRIAL CONFERENCE REPORT

PRE-TRIAL CONFERENCE REPORT (Criminal Code, s )

THE EVIDENCE ACT OF BHUTAN, 2005

Form 23 PRE-HEARING CONFERENCE REPORT FOR CROWN APPLICATIONS

Rules of Evidence (Abridged)

The Nuts & Bolts of the Rules of Evidence

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE STATE OF OREGON FOR LINN COUNTY

Evidentiary Challenges in Divorce Cases: From Writings and Photos to Text Messages and Social Media

Presenters 10/13/2015. Effective Use of Evidence and Expert Witnesses in Immigration Court

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF

TEXAS RULES OF EVIDENCE Effective June 14, Title, Scope, and Applicability of the Rules; Definitions

California Bar Examination

Demonstrative Evidence

TRIAL PRACTICE No SPRING 2012

THE NATIONAL CENTER FOR JUSTICE AND

STATE'S SUPPLEMENTAL MOTION IN LIMINE REGARDING COMPUTER ANIMATION

EVIDENCE CALIFORNIA DISTINCTIONS Bar Exam Outline

Protecting the Child s Voice: Use and Application of the Child Victim Hearsay Exception

FULL OUTLINE. Bar Exam Doctor BAREXAMDOCTOR.COM. EVIDENCE

Case 1:17-cr KBF Document 819 Filed 06/11/18 Page ORDERED. 1 of 8 GUIDELINES REGARDING APPROPRIATE USE OF 302 FORMS IN CRIMINAL TRIALS

Evidence Update. ISBA Criminal Law Seminar. April 17, 2015

THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE TWENTIETH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR CHARLOTTE COUNTY,

3. Analyzing the admissibility of expert testimony consists of asking four questions:

FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT GILPIN COUNTY DISTRICT COURT Court Address: 2960 Dory Hill Road, Suite 200 Black Hawk, Colorado ext.

INDEX. NOTE: References are to heading numbers. ABANDONMENT elements of offence, 19:10

SIMPLIFIED RULES OF EVIDENCE AND PROCEDURE

Written materials by Jonathan D. Sasser

Impeachment in Louisiana State Courts:

Overview of Trial Proceedings Role of Judge/Jury, Markman Hearings, and Introduction to Evidence

PREPARING FOR AND TAKING DEPOSITIONS IN A PERSONAL INJURY CASE

EVIDENCE Kuhns Fall 2006

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA STANDING ORDER FOR CIVIL JURY TRIALS BEFORE DISTRICT JUDGE JON S.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE STATE OF OREGON FOR LAKE COUNTY. CASE No CR

A JUDGE S PERSPECTIVE ON EVIDENCE. (Basic Tools of Your New Trade) W. David Lee. Senior Resident Superior Court Judge.

AUTHENTICATION AND ORIGINAL WRITINGS

6. Secondary evidence rule. 7. CEC 352 discretion to exclude for unfair prejudice. a 2/3 vote by legislature after 1982.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI DIVISION. v. C.A. NO. C

HINTS FOR PREPARING FOR THE MOCK TRIAL COMPETITION

JEFFERSON COLLEGE COURSE SYLLABUS CRJ114 RULES OF CRIMINAL EVIDENCE. 3 credit hours. Prepared by: Mark A. Byington

EVIDENCE CHAPTER 65 EVIDENCE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK UNIFORM PRETRIAL SCHEDULING ORDER. Civil No. 1:13-CV-1211 vs. GLS/TWD Andrew Cuomo, et al.

Vermont Bar Association Seminar Materials. 62nd Mid-Year Meeting. Criminal Law 101

Objections DEFINITIONS

EFFECTIVE CROSS-EXAMINATION TIPS LAWRENCE J. WHITNEY, ATTORNEY AT LAW

Chapter 8C. Evidence Code. 8C-1. Rules of Evidence. The North Carolina Rules of Evidence are as follows:

Book containing this chapter and any forms referenced herein is available for purchase at or by calling

TRIAL DOCUMENTS PROVING, TENDERING AND CROSS-EXAMINATION

Federal Rules of Civil Procedure

CONTENTS. vii. Acknowledgments

Evidence 213B Professor Schroeder (Fall 2015) Reading List / Course Assignments (Rev. 08/08/2015) Page 1

TRIAL COURT JUDGE AND ATTORNEY STUDY GUIDE

Transcription:

Evidence Presented by: Ervin Gonzalez, Esq. This seminar focuses on the fundamentals of evidence in Florida including documentary evidence, demonstrative evidence, expert testimony, trial objectives and objections and impeachment of witnesses. I. DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE A. Business Records B. Tape Recordings C. Photographs D. Authenticating a Letter E. Diagrams F. Refreshing Recollection G. Authenticating Handwriting in a Document II. DEMONSTRATIVE EVIDENCE A. Introduction 1. Importance of Demonstrative Evidence 2. Nature and Definition 3. Demonstrative Aids B. Admissibility 1. In General 2. Discretion of Court 3. Pretrial Procedures 4. Laying Foundation C. Types 1. In General 2. Charts 3. Models 4. Demonstrations and Experiments 5. Photographs a. Relevancy b. Foundational Issues c. Pictorial Testimony or Silent Witness 6. Videotapes, DVD or Film 7. Replicas 8. Real Evidence 9. Scientific Tests a. General Standard b. Particular Applications i. X-Rays ii. Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) iii. Liquid Crystal Thermography (LCT) iv. Polygraphs

v. DNA Evidence vi. Sexual Abuse Legitimacy Scale vii. Serum Blood Alcohol Test viii. Computer Animation D. Practical Considerations 1. Logistics 2. Videotape/DVD 3. Graphics 4. Real Evidence 5. Computer Animation and Simulation 6. Disk-Based Litigation (CD-Rom and Laser Disk Presentation Devices) 7. Conclusions III. IV. FOUNDATIONS FOR DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE A. Business Records B. Tape Recordings C. Photographs D. Authenticating a Letter E. Diagrams F. Refreshing Recollection G. Authenticating Handwriting in a Document EXPERT TESTIMONY A. Overview 1. Purpose of expert testimony 2. Ethical considerations in using expert witnesses 3. Who is an Expert? 4. Required Showing of Qualifications 5. Court s Discretion to Accept Qualifications 6. Proper Subjects of Expert Testimony 7. Matters Not Within Jury s Common Knowledge 8. Ultimate issues; invasion of province of jury as finder of fact 9. Opinion not binding on trier of fact 10. Trial court s discretion to permit expert testimony 11. Standard for admissibility of disputed scientific evidence 12. Factors determining admissibility 13. Scientific aids and theories B. Experts Depositions 1. Deposition of expert 2. Use of Video Depositions C. Objections D. Preparing for an Expert s Deposition E. Trial Preparation 1. Disclosing the Expert Witness List 2. Reading the Expert s Publications and Articles

3. Reading the Expert s Previous Testimony 4. Preparing the Expert for Trial F. Direct Examination 1. Laying the Foundation 2. Sequence of Testimony 3. Qualifying the Expert 4. Tendering the Witness as an Expert 5. Opposing Counsel s Right to Voir Dire 6. Excusing the jury 7. Using leading questions 8. Stipulation to expert s qualifications 9. Use of Demonstrative Aids 10. Demonstrative Evidence Generally 11. Types of Demonstrative Evidence 12. Use of Demonstrative Evidence at Trial a. What it Adds to Your Case b. Admissibility 13. Eliciting Expert Testimony 14. Educate the Jury 15. Develop the Expert s Testimony to set up the opinion 16. Leading Questions 17. Use Plain and Simple Language 18. Focus on the Expert G. The Expert Opinion 1. In General 2. Basis for Opinion Testimony 3. Expert s Opinion May Include Ultimate Issue of Fact 4. Opinion must be Based upon Facts Supported in the Record 5. Facts Observed by Expert or Within Expert s Knowledge 6. Facts Derived from Multiple Sources 7. Direct Personal Observation Not Required 8. Other Documents 9. Opinion Based on Inadmissible Information 10. Statistics and Estimates 11. Computer Simulations 12. Published Treatises 13. Hypothetical Questions H. Expert Testimony on Particular Topics 1. Medicine 2. Business 3. Agriculture 4. Real or personal property value 5. Value of services 6. Handwriting 7. How an accident occurred 8. Speed of moving objects

9. Ballistics 10. DNA 11. Fingerprint and footprint 12. Other experiments, demonstrations and tests I. Cross-Examination of Experts 1. Allowable questions 2. The Sequence of the Cross 3. Attack the Expert s Witnesses 4. Establish Bias 5. Challenge the Expert s Qualifications 6. Have the Opposing Expert Agree with You 7. Failure to Consider Other Facts or Data 8. Attack the Underlying Facts Using a Hypothetical Question 9. Authoritative Texts 10. Prior Inconsistent Statements 11. Impeachment using Depositions 12. Impeachment using Inconsistent Statements in Documents or Past Speeches 13. Financial Interest J. Request for an Examination by an Expert 1. Physical examination; identifying blood group 2. The request 3. The response 4. Disclosure of reports 5. Sanction for failure to disclose reports 6. Expert examiner as witness V. TRIAL OBJECTIVES A. Rulings on Evidence B. Judicial Notice C. Presumptions D. Relevant Evidence and Admissibility of Certain Types of Evidence E. Privileges F. Witnesses Who May Testify and Exclusion of Witnesses G. Expert Witnesses H. Hearsay I. Authentication and Introduction of Documents and Photographs J. Public Records VI. FLORIDA EVIDENTIARY TRIAL OBJECTIONS A. Ambiguous B. Argumentative C. Asked and Answered D. Assumes Facts Not in Evidence E. Authentication Lacking F. Best Evidence Rule.

G. Beyond Scope (of direct, cross direct, etc.) H. Compound I. Conclusion J. Confusing and Unintelligible K. Counsel Testifying L. Cumulative M. Foundation Lacking N. Impeachment by Improper Means O. Improper Characterization P. Irrelevant Q. Leading R. Misquoting Witness S. Narrative T. Opinion U. Prejudice outweighed by Probative Value V. Privileged W. Speculation and Conjecture X. Unresponsive Y. Hearsay 1. Hearsay, generally 2. Non-Hearsay Prior Statements 3. Hearsay within Hearsay 4. Hearsay Exception: Absence of Entry in Business Records 5. Hearsay Exception: Absence of Public Record or Entry 6. Hearsay Exception: Admissions 7. Hearsay Exception: Excited Utterance 8. Hearsay Exception: Family Records 9. Hearsay Exception: Former Testimony 10. Hearsay Exception: Judgment of Previous Conviction 11. Hearsay Exception: Market Reports and Commercial Publications 12. Hearsay Exception: Marriage, Baptismal and Similar Certificates 13. Hearsay Exceptions: Public Records and Reports 14. Hearsay Exception: Records of Documents reflecting an Interest in Property 15. Hearsay Exception: Recorded Recollection 16. Hearsay Exception: Records of Regularly Conducted Activity (Business Records) 17. Hearsay Exceptions: Records of Religious Organizations 18. Hearsay Exception: Records of Vital Statistics 19. Hearsay Exception: Reputation as to Character 20. Hearsay Exception: Reputation Concerning Boundaries or General History 21. Hearsay Exception: Reputation Concerning Personal or Family History 22. Hearsay Exception: Requirement of Unavailability for Rule 90.804 Hearsay Exceptions

23. Hearsay Exception: Spontaneous Statement 24. Hearsay Exception: Statement Against Interest 25. Hearsay Exception: Statement in Ancient Documents 26. Hearsay Exception: Statement of Child Victim 27. Hearsay Exception: Statement in Documents Affecting an Interest in Property 28. Hearsay Exception: Statement of Personal or Family History 29. Hearsay Exception: Statement for Purposes of Medical Diagnosis or Treatment 30. Hearsay Exception: Statement Under Belief of Impending Death 31. Hearsay Exception: Then-Existing Mental or Emotional Condition 32. Hearsay Exception: Then-Existing Physical Condition VII. VIII. IMPEACHMENT OF A WITNESS A. Depositions B. Use of Inconsistent Statements in Documents IMPEACHMENT WITH AUTHORITATIVE TREATISES