Benefits and Dangers of U.S. Provisional Applications

Similar documents
Changes To Implement the First Inventor To File Provisions of the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act Final Rules

First Inventor to File: Proposed Rules and Proposed Examination Guidelines

CHANGES TO IMPLEMENT THE INVENTOR S OATH OR DECLARATION PROVISIONS OF

Priority Claims, Incorporation By Reference, and how to fix errors, big and small. March 9, Jack G. Abid. Orlando, Florida

Application Drafting and Provisional Applications

Prioritized Examination and New Prior Art defined for First-Inventor-to-File

Patent Reform Fact and Fiction. What You Need to Know to Prepare for the First Inventor to File Transition. November 27, 2012

PATENT PROSECUTION STRATEGIES IN AN AIA WORLD: SUCCEEDING WITH THE CHANGES

Digital lab notebooks and intellectual property protection

Foreign Patent Law. Why file foreign? Why NOT file foreign? Richard J. Melker

America Invents Act of 2011 Part 1: Impact on Litigation Strategy Part 2: Strategic Considerations of the FTF Transition

Patent Law & Nanotechnology: An Examiner s Perspective. Eric Woods MiRC Technical Staff

Overview of the Patenting Process

CORRECTION OF ISSUED PATENTS

Section 5 Exceptions to Lack of Novelty of Invention (Patent Act Article 30)

New Patent Application Rules Set to Take Effect November 1, 2007

LexisNexis Expert Commentaries David Heckadon on the Differences Between US and Canadian Patent Prosecution

Changes to Implement the First Inventor to File Provisions of the Leahy-Smith. AGENCY: United States Patent and Trademark Office, Commerce.

TOP 3 PATENT DOCKETING VULNERABILITIES AND UNRECOVERABLE DATES. September 14, 2016

Practice Tips for Foreign Applicants

THE AMERICA INVENTS ACT

MBHB snippets Alert October 13, 2011

Moving Patent Applications Through the USPTO: Options for Applicants

BEST PRACTICES FOR EFFICIENT DOCKETING OF ROUTINE FORMALITIES: PART 1

RECORD OF INVENTION. VIRGINIA MILITARY INSTITUTE Lexington, VA

Patentable Inventions Versus Unpatentable: How to Assess and Decide

Professional Responsibility for IP Practitioners OED s Role and Responsibilities in Handling Grievances and Disciplinary Matters Against Practitioners

PRACTICE TIPS FOR PATENT PROSECUTION BEFORE THE USPTO

Patent litigation. Block 1. Module Priority. Essentials: Priority. Introduction

Procedure of Determining Novelty and Inventive Step

Introduction. 1 These materials are public information and have been prepared solely for educational and entertainment purposes to contribute

Provisional Patent Applications: Preserving IP Rights in First-to-File System

IP CONCLAVE 2010, MUMBAI STRATEGIES WITH US PATENT PRACTICE NAREN THAPPETA US PATENT ATTORNEY & INDIA PATENT AGENT BANGALORE, INDIA

Understanding and Applying the CREATE Act in Collaborations

Patent Prosecution Under The AIA

This document gives a brief summary of the patent application process. The attached chart shows the most common patent protection routes.

STRATEGIC CONSIDERATIONS IN COORDINATING ACCELERATION OF INTERNATIONAL PATENT PROSECUTION

EXPLANATORY NOTES ON THE PATENT LAW TREATY AND REGULATIONS UNDER THE PATENT LAW TREATY * prepared by the International Bureau

ROMANIA Patent Law NO.64/1991 OFFICIAL GAZETTE OF ROMANIA, PART I, NO.613/19 AUGUST 2014

Patent Law in Cambodia

OFFICIAL GAZETTE OF ROMANIA, PART I, NO.613/19 AUGUST 2014 REPUBLICATION PATENT LAW NO.64/1991 1

The Honorable David J. Kappos Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office

Topic 12: Priority Claims and Prior Art

Delain Law Office, PLLC

Patent and License Overview. Kirsten Leute, Senior Associate Office of Technology Licensing, Stanford University

WORLD INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY ORGANIZATION GENEVA PATENT LAW TREATY (PLT) ASSEMBLY. Fifth (3 rd Extraordinary) Session Geneva, September 22 to 30, 2008

patents grant only the right to stop others from making, using and selling the invention

Novelty. Japan Patent Office

WSPLA (Wash. State Patent Law Assoc.) Lunch Seminar

Three Types of Patents

24 Criteria for the Recognition of Inventors and the Procedure to Settle Disputes about the Recognition of Inventors

Amendments in Europe and the United States

Change in Procedure Relating to an Application Filing Date

Provisional English Version. September, 2011 Revised in March, 2015 Japan Patent Office

Preparing A Patent Application

Normal Examination Speed (2/2)

PATENT DISCLOSURE: Meeting Expectations in the USPTO

GERMAN UTILITY MODEL THE UNDERRATED INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHT DATE: WEDNESDAY 12 NOVEMBER 2014 LOCATION: GLASGOW, UK

SEC PROVISIONS TO IMPLEMENT THE PATENT LAW TREATY

Patents. What is a Patent? 11/16/2017. The Decision Between Patent and Trade Secret Protection

Intellectual Property Reform In Australia

Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT) Working Group

Key Words Glossary Contents

Patent Basics for Emerging Companies. Maria Laccotripe Zacharakis, Ph.D. Thomas Hoover Daniel J. Kelly McCarter & English, LLP

10 Strategic Drafting of Applications for U.S. Patents by Japanese Companies from an Enforcement Perspective

INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LAWS AMENDMENT (RAISING THE BAR ACT) 2012

Intellectual Property. EMBL Summer Institute 2010 Dusty Gwinn WVURC

COMPARATIVE STUDY REPORT REQUIREMENTS FOR DISCLOSURE AND CLAIMS - 1 -

NIH Revises Rules Governing Inventions Developed Under Bayh-Dole Act

This document gives a brief summary of the patent application process. The attached chart shows the most common patent protection routes.

FC3 (P5) International Patent Law 2 FINAL Mark Scheme 2017

Overview of recent trends in patent regimes in United States, Japan and Europe

Patent Exam Fall 2015

Selection Inventions the Inventive Step Requirement, other Patentability Criteria and Scope of Protection

INVENTION DISCLOSURE FORM

Accelerating the Acquisition of an Enforceable Patent: Bypassing the USPTO s Backlog Lawrence A. Stahl and Seth E. Boeshore

The Evolving State of the Law on Utility. Teresa Stanek Rea Crowell & Moring LLP April 16, 2015

WHAT IS A PATENT AND WHAT DOES IT PROTECT?

FINAL RULES IMPLEMENTING EIGHTEEN MONTH PUBLICATION OF PATENT APPLICATIONS

Tips On Maximizing Patent Term Adjustment

Dynamic Drinkware, a Technical Trap for the Unwary

Rule 130 Declarations for First-Inventor-to-File Applications

Your Guide to Patents

HOW TO EVALUATE WHEN A REISSUE VIOLATES THE RECAPTURE RULE:

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

AIA Post-Grant Implementation Begins - Is Your Business Strategy Aligned? August 27, A Web conference hosted by Foley & Lardner LLP

For a patent to be valid, it needs to be useful, novel, nonobvious, and adequately

Martín BENSADON, Alicia ALVAREZ, Damaso PARDO, Ignacio SÁNCHEZ ECHAÜE.

Invention Disclosures and the Role of Inventors

SINGAPORE IP LEGISLATION UPDATE

United States Patent and Trademark Office Registration Examination for Patent Attorneys and Agents April 18, Afternoon Session Model Answers

Performing a Preliminary Assessment of Patentability for a New Invention: Guidelines For Non-Patent Lawyers

Industry IP5 Consensus Proposals to the IP5 Patent Harmonization Experts Panel (PHEP)

POTENTIAL PATENT APPLICATION QUESTIONNAIRE

Chapter 2 Internal Priority

APPLICABILITY OF CERTAIN AMENDMENTS AND MODIFICATIONS OF THE PATENT COOPERATION TREATY (PCT) TO THE PATENT LAW TREATY (PLT)

Our Speakers: Rudy I. Kratz Partner; Fitch, Even, Tabin & Flannery LLP. Tony Wray Director and Founder; Optimus Patents Ltd.

The programme commenced on 15 Jun 2009 and was revised on 15 Apr It will continue to be reviewed regularly.

Patent Rule Changes to Support Implementation of the United States Patent and Trademark Office 21 st Century Strategic Plan

The Death of the Written Description Requirement? Analysis and Potential Outcomes of the Ariad Case

Transcription:

Benefits and Dangers of U.S. Provisional Applications 2012 IP Summer Seminar Kathryn A. Piffat, Ph.D. Senior Associate, Intellectual Property kpiffat@edwardswildman.com July 2012 2012 Edwards Wildman Palmer LLP & Edwards Wildman Palmer UK LLP Overview History of Provisional Patent Applications Statutory Requirements for Provisional Applications Conversion of a Provisional to a Non-Provisional Conversion of a Non-Provisional to a Provisional Benefits vs. Dangers Strategies for Filing Multiple Provisional Applications Within the 12- Month Period Claim Strategies Overall Recommendations 1 1

History of the U.S. Provisional Patent Application Uruguay Round Agreement 20-year minimum patent term WTO member states BUT U.S. Continuing Applications Foreign priority applications not considered when calculating term Disadvantage for U.S. applicants 2 Minimum Statutory Requirements Specification (35 U.S.C. 112, 1st par.) Drawing (35 U.S.C. 113) Fee Additional Requirements: Inventor s name and residence Identification as a provisional application Title Attorney / agent s name and registration number Correspondence address Docket U.S. Government agency /contract number 3 2

Comparison to Non-Provisional Application Provisional: Specification Drawing Fees Inventor s Name Inventor s Residence NO Claim NO Oath / Declaration NO Priority Claim NO IDS Non-Provisional: Specification Drawing Fees Inventor s Name Inventor s Residence At least one claim Oath / Declaration Current Law America Invents Act Priority Claim IDS 4 Comparison to Non-Provisional Application Provisional: 35 U.S.C. 111(b) 37 CFR 1.53(c) 12-month term No priority claim Not publicly available unless priority claimed No examination May be converted to a nonprovisional Not included in 20-year term Non-Provisional: 35 U.S.C. 111(a) 35 U.S.C. 371 (PCT) 37 CFR 1.53(b) Priority claim Publication Examination May be converted to a provisional Included in 20-year term 5 3

Conversion of a Provisional to a Non- Provisional Provisional application may be converted to a non-provisional application within the 12-month term (35 U.S.C. 111(b)(5)) Requirements: Request for Conversion Amendment including a claim (if no claims present in provisional application) Oath/Declaration by the inventors Current Law America Invents Act Fees 6 Conversion of a Provisional to a Non- Provisional (cont d) Advantage: Can use as a back-up if inventor becomes deceased or unavailable during the 12-month period Can have inventors execute declaration when provisional is filed BUT declaration is for this application not later application Later application may have more material Later application may have additional inventors Later application has priority claim Store executed declaration in file in case of need to avoid complicated procedures for showing: Inventor is deceased Inventor is uncooperative Inventor cannot be located Impact of America Invents Act? 7 4

Conversion of a Provisional to a Non- Provisional (cont d) Disadvantage: Loss of patent term advantage provided by filing provisional application as priority application Patent term now begins with original filing date of converted provisional application Better patent term solution: File separate non-provisional application with procedures for showing deceased, uncooperative, or missing inventor Special procedures may be expensive and delay prosecution Later portion of patent term may be less important in some industries 8 Conversion of a Non-Provisional to a Provisional Non-provisional application may be converted to a provisional application (37 C.F.R. 1.53(c)(2)) Requirements: Request for Conversion Fee Timing for Request Within 12 months of filing date of application Prior to abandonment of application Prior to payment of issue fee Prior to filing of request for statutory invention registration Cannot claim priority to an earlier application 9 5

Conversion of a Non-Provisional to a Provisional Patent application assumed to be a regular utility application unless clearly marked Can be used to correct a filing intended to be a provisional application Can be used to extend patent term where original application filed was a non-provisional, provided request is timely filed within the 12-month period 10 Why File a Provisional Application? Fewer formal requirements Less expensive Prepared more quickly helpful for first-to-file system No examination 12-month term for research and formalities Pro se preparation possible Not included in 20-year term Not publicly available unless priority claimed Constructive reduction to practice an advantage for first-to-invent (Current Law) Possibility of multiple provisionals an advantage for first-to-file (America Invents Act) 11 6

Potential Dangers Poor drafting Insufficient time Insufficient resources or budget Pro se drafting No drafting: copies of notebook pages, papers, patents Insufficient description (35 U.S.C. 112) Disclosure of confidential or unrelated material Inclusion of speculations for future work Publicly available once priority claimed 12 Constructive Reduction to Practice Meets 35 U.S.C. 112, 1st par., requirements Establishes date of invention: For subsequent non-provisional application Unless unpredictable field (e.g., biotechnology) Advantage for first-to-invent system America Invents Act: House and Senate have passed bills changing system to a first-to-file system A way to show reduction to practice by inventor Other aspects also an advantage for first-to-file system 13 7

Advantages for Foreign Applicants Foreign applicant may file U.S. provisional for invention made abroad in a country other than a NAFTA country or WTO country 35 U.S.C. 102(b) opportunity to prove a date of invention earlier than filing date (35 U.S.C. 104): the invention was patented or described in a printed publication in this or a foreign country or in public use or on sale in this country, more than one year prior to the date of the application for patent in the United States. 35 U.S.C. 102(e) prior art after grant of subsequent nonprovisional U.S. patent application 14 Multiple Provisional Applications Within the 12-Month Period Applicant should consider filing multiple provisional applications within the 12-month period from the first provisional application where either: Research continues during the 12-month period or The invention is in a highly competitive field (e.g., pharmaceuticals) Advantages Each application contains additional information, embodiments, or experimental results Each application establishes reduction to practice with respect to new information, embodiments, or experimental results Unlimited number of provisional applications can be filed within the 12- month period America Invents Act: Advantage in first-to-file system 15 8

Multiple Provisional Applications Within the 12-Month Period (cont d) BUT Regular utility application must be filed within 12 months from the first provisional application filed! Priority claim: Recites first-filed provisional application Recites all provisional applications of interest Example: First provisional filed: 8 March 2011 Additional provisionals filed: 8 June 2011 8 September 2011 8 December 2011 Regular utility application due 8 March 2012 Priority claim to all four provisionals NOTE: Priority for some added material may extend only to the filing date of the provisional in which it was initially mentioned still earlier than utility date 16 The Paris Convention and Multiple Provisional Applications Non-provisional application must be filed within 12 months of first provisional to claim priority of first provisional Some applicants claim priority only of second provisional to extend patent term, BUT: Must abandon first provisional before filing second May still claim priority of first provisional within one year of filing first provisional Cannot revive first provisional application after 12-month period ends from filing of first provisional 17 9

Claiming Strategies: Claims Not Required 35 U.S.C. 111(b)(2): A claim, as required by the second through fifth paragraphs of section 112, shall not be required in a provisional application. Provisional claims not examined Fulfillment of 35 U.S.C. 112, 1st par., by provisional specification for validity of priority can only be determined after non-provisional filed and non-provisional claims examined 18 Claiming Strategies: Filing with Claims Complete claim set Bolsters disclosure and enablement Bolsters best mode Current Law America Invents Act: Still include to support claim language Shows inventor contemplated all aspects Facilitates commercialization Festo concerns inapplicable under current law US format vs. EPO format One broad claim or one broad claim per aspect One narrow claim or a few narrow claims Omnibus / picture claim 19 10

Claiming Strategies: Filing without Claims Article 4 of the Paris Convention: filing equivalent to a regular national filing filing adequate to establish the date on which the application was filed certain elements do not appear among the claims provided that the application documents specifically disclose such elements Concern about view of application abroad 20 Overall Recommendations Provisional applications provide advantages BUT Provisional applications must be taken seriously to reap full benefits Draft as if non-provisional Obtain signatures from inventors in reserve Assignment Possibly Declaration Include full claim set Consider filing multiple provisional applications during initial 12- month period, then filing non-provisional within 12 months of first provisional and claiming priority of all provisionals 21 11

Conclusions History of Provisional Patent Applications Statutory Requirements for Provisional Applications Conversion of a Provisional to a Non-Provisional Conversion of a Non-Provisional to a Provisional Benefits vs. Dangers Strategies for Filing Multiple Provisional Applications Within the 12- Month Period Claim Strategies Overall Recommendations 22 12