Model Law on Electronic Evidence

Similar documents
BELIZE ELECTRONIC EVIDENCE ACT CHAPTER 95:01 REVISED EDITION 2003 SHOWING THE SUBSTANTIVE LAWS AS AT 31ST MAY, 2003

COMMONWEALTH OF DOMINICA

SAINT VINCENT AND THE GRENADINES ELECTRONIC EVIDENCE ACT, 2004 ARRANGEMENT OF SECTIONS SECTION 1. Short title and commencement 2. Interpretation 3.

ELECTRONIC RECORDS: THE SASKATCHEWAN EVIDENCE AMENDMENT T AC 2000

OBJECTS AND REASONS

Presentation to: Central and Latin American InterPARES Dissemination Team

Archival Legislation in Singapore

1 ELECTRONIC COMMUNICATIONS IN CONTRACTUAL TRANSACTIONS 2 DRAFT TABLE OF CONTENTS 3 PART 1 4 GENERAL PROVISIONS

ELECTRONIC TRANSACTIONS LAW

Annex A ELECTRONIC TRANSACTIONS LAW

Evidence Act CHAPTER 154 OF THE REVISED STATUTES, as amended by

NEVADA REVISED STATUTES. Title 59 - ELECTRONIC RECORDS AND TRANSACTIONS CHAPTER 719 ELECTRONIC TRANSACTIONS (UNIFORM ACT)

Title 10: COMMERCE AND TRADE

Title 15: COURT PROCEDURE -- CRIMINAL

FINAL REPORT ON THE LAW OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY

ARRANGEMENT OF SECTIONS PART I PRELIMINARY

CHAPTER 308B ELECTRONIC TRANSACTIONS

GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF NORTH CAROLINA SESSION 1999 S 1 SENATE BILL 1266

ORGANISATION OF EASTERN CARIBBEAN STATES

UNCITRAL E-SIGN UETA COMPARISON 1

DELAWARE CODE TITLE 6. COMMERCE AND TRADE SUBTITLE II. OTHER LAWS RELATING TO COMMERCE AND TRADE CHAPTER 12A. UNIFORM ELECTRONIC TRANSACTIONS ACT

Commonwealth Schemes for International Cooperation in Criminal Matters. Office of Civil and Criminal Justice Reform

The Electronic Information and Documents Act, 2000

Electronic evidence in Tanzania

UNCITRAL Model Law on Electronic Commerce with Guide to Enactment 1996 With additional article 5 bis as adopted in 1998

UNITED NATIONS COMMISSION ON INTERNATIONAL TRADE LAW (UNCITRAL) UNCITRAL Model Law on Electronic Commerce with Guide to Enactment 1996

As Introduced. 132nd General Assembly Regular Session S. B. No

Tentative Translation ELECTRONIC TRANSACTIONS ACT, B.E (2001) 1

OFFICIAL POLICY. Policy Statement

Georgia Computer System Protection Act

RAYTHEON COMPANY ELECTRONIC DATA INTERCHANGE TRADING PARTNER AGREEMENT

H. R [Report No , Parts I and II]

ELECTRONIC COMMERCE ACT

This title may be cited as the Uniform Electronic Transactions Act.

U.S. Code Title 15 Commerce and Trade Chapter 96 Electronic Signature in Global and National Commerce Act Section General rule of validity

Republic Act No ELECTRONIC COMMERCE ACT OF 2000

EXHIBIT D THE UNITED NATIONS CONVENTION ON THE USE OF ELECTRONIC COMMUNICATIONS IN INTERNATIONAL CONTRACTS WITH AMERICAN COMMENTARY

Electronic Transactions Act, Act, Act 772 ARRANGEMENT OF SECTIONS. Object and scope of the Act

ASEAN ELECTRONIC COMMERCE LEGISLATION COMPARISON TABLE (version dated 1 Dec 2000) MATRIX UNCITRAL Singapore Brunei Thailand Malaysia Philippines

ELECTRONIC COMMUNICATIONS AND TRANSACTIONS ACT, ACT NO. 25 OF 2002 [ASSENTED TO 31 JULY 2002] [DATE OF COMMENCEMENT: 30 AUGUST 2002]

Summary of Committee Discussion/Questions No discussion or questions occurred among Committee members prior to approval of the proposed policy.

[CAPTION] INTERROGATORIES [NAME AND ADDRESS OF PLAINTIFF S ATTORNEY] Attorneys for Plaintiff TO:

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND ANALYSIS VOLUME 4 ISSUE 1

MEMORANDUM. Electronic Transactions Act Drafting Committee and Observers.

COMPUTER OUTPUT AS EVIDENCE FINAL REPORT

( ) Page: 1/5 WORK PROGRAMME ON ELECTRONIC COMMERCE ELECTRONIC SIGNATURES. Communication from Argentina, Brazil and Paraguay

REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES DEPARTMENT OF TRADE AND INDUSTRY DEPARMENT OF BUDGET AND MANAGEMENT BANGKO SENTRAL NG PILIPINAS

ARTICLE ONE GENERAL 2009 OPERATING RULES ARTICLE ONE. SUBSECTION Effect of Illegality

LAWS OF MALAYSIA. Act A1137

DOCUMENTARY, VOICE IDENTIFICATION AND E-EVIDENCE -- FOUNDATIONAL REQUIREMENTS W. David Lee Superior Court Judges Fall Conference October 23-26, 2007

COMPUTER OUTPUT AS EVIDENCE CONSULTATION PAPER CONSULTATION

THE NEGOTIABLE INSTRUMENTS (AMENDMENT AND MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS) BILL, 2002

Archival Legislation in Hong Kong Evidence Ordinance (Cap 8) and the Personal Data (Privacy) Ordinance (Cap 486)

The Saskatchewan Evidence Act

HIPSSA SADC Model Law on Electronic Transactions & Electronic Commerce. Establishment of Harmonized Policies for the ICT Market in the ACP

ARTICLE 1 GENERAL PROVISIONS

THE ERIE WESTERN-PENNSYLVANIA PORT AUTHORITY RULES AND REGULATIONS GOVERNING THE RELEASE OF PUBLIC RECORDS UNDER THE PENNSYLVANIA RIGHT-TO-KNOW LAW

A. The following official is hereby designated as the Open-Records Officer, at the following address:

H 7502 SUBSTITUTE A ======== LC004302/SUB A ======== S T A T E O F R H O D E I S L A N D

79th OREGON LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY Regular Session. Enrolled. House Bill 2610

RULES OF PROCEDURE OF THE FITNESS TO PRACTISE COMMITTEE OF THE ONTARIO COLLEGE OF SOCIAL WORKERS AND SOCIAL SERVICE WORKERS INDEX

NC General Statutes - Chapter 1 Article 45C 1

Criminal Procedure Amendment (Mandatory Pre-trial Defence Disclosure) Act 2013 No 10

ICC Rules of Conciliation and Arbitration 1975

NC General Statutes - Chapter 36F 1

To obtain permission to reuse or republish electronically any material copyrighted by Plaza on the River, please contact

EVIDENCE. The Evidence Act

Title 17-A: MAINE CRIMINAL CODE

STANDARD TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF MAYBANK COE OPEN BIDDING SERVICE

NASS Support for the Revised National Electronic Notarization Standards

1.1 In this Agreement, the following words and expressions shall have the meanings set out hereunder unless the context otherwise requires:

UNITED NATIONS CONVENTION ON THE USE OF ELECTRONIC COMMUNICATIONS IN INTERNATIONAL CONTRACTS

E-Transactions Comparative Law Analysis

CHAPTER 137. AUTHENTICATIONS AND ELECTRONIC TRANSACTIONS AND RECORDS SUBCHAPTER I

INTERNATIONAL CHAMBER OF COMMERCE INTERNATIONAL STANDBY PRACTICES (ISP98) (ICC publication No. 590)

APPENDIX. 1. The Equipment Interference Regime which is relevant to the activities of GCHQ principally derives from the following statutes:

EVIDENCE CHAPTER 65 EVIDENCE

Legal USE OF SITE SITE CONTENTS AND OWNERSHIP

NC General Statutes - Chapter 32C Article 1 1

Commonwealth Blue Charter. Shared Values, Shared Ocean. A Commonwealth Commitment to Work Together to Protect and Manage our Ocean

Commonwealth Blue Charter. Shared Values, Shared Ocean. A Commonwealth Commitment to Work Together to Protect and Manage our Ocean

Contractual Interpretation In Singapore: Compatibility With The Evidence Act?

Subpart A General Provisions

ANALYSIS. 1980, No. 2. An Act to amend the Commissions of Inquiry Act 1908 [4 July BE IT ENACTED by the General Assembly of New Zealand

1. Electronic means relating to technology having electrical, digital, magnetic, wireless, optical, electromagnetic, or similar capabilities.

CANADIAN ANTI-SPAM LAW [FEDERAL]

IFTECH INVENTING FUTURE TECHNOLOGY INC. ARAIG SDK AGREEMENT

WEBSITE TERMS OF USE AGREEMENT

LAWS OF MALAYSIA. Act A1140

New Jersey Annotated Statutes

Scheme and Model Bill for the Protection of Cultural Heritage Within the Commonwealth

Civil Procedure Act 2010

Compliance audits 22. (1) The Commission is responsible for the enforcement of the obligations imposed on employers by sections 5, 9 to 15 and 17.

Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 23 November [on the report of the Sixth Committee (A/60/515)]

Chapter 10 Information Technology (Amendment) Act, 2008

Evidence In Civil Proceedings: An Australian Perspective On Documentary And Electronic Evidence -... Page 1 of 11

Electronic Commerce 101. David TS Fraser RELANS April 2010

USER AGREEMENT FOR AMERICAN HEART ASSOCIATION HEALTHY FOR GOOD

This Agreement was last updated on June 14th, It is effective between You and Axosoft as of the date of You accepting this Agreement.

JW PLASTIC SURGERY. Terms of Service

Transcription:

Model Law on Electronic Evidence Office of Civil and Criminal Justice Reform

Model Law on Electronic Evidence

Commonwealth Secretariat 2017 All rights reserved. This publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording or otherwise provided it is used only for educational purposes and is not for resale, and provided full acknowledgement is given to the Commonwealth Secretariat as the original publisher. Views and opinions expressed in this publication are the responsibility of the author and should in no way be attributed to the institutions to which they are affiliated or to the Commonwealth Secretariat. Wherever possible, the Commonwealth Secretariat uses paper sourced from responsible forests or from sources that minimise a destructive impact on the environment. Printed and published by the Commonwealth Secretariat.

Introduction \ 1 Introduction Computer records are sophisticated systems that may be more prone or vulnerable to alteration and degradation than paper records. When it comes to the use of electronic or computer records in legal proceedings, this attribute of electronic evidence may, in some jurisdictions, be the subject of specific admissibility and evidence rules. This Model Law on Electronic Evidence aims to provide such a framework for the admissibility and treatment of electronic records in the context of civil, criminal or administrative proceedings in a court or before a tribunal, board or commission. The Model Law contains provisions on general admissibility, the scope of the model law, authentication, application of best evidence rule, presumption of integrity, standards, proof by affidavit, cross examination, agreement on admissibility of electronic records, and admissibility of electronic signature. Most jurisdictions seeking to impose a minimum level of reliability for admissibility of documents do so by focusing not on the document itself but rather on the method or system by which the document was produced. This is because it is very difficult to show anything about the electronic document itself. By showing the reliability of the system, however, it is possible to lay the basis for admissibility of the document which is the product of that system. Accordingly, the Model Law draws on the Singapore Evidence Act Section 35 (1), the Canada Uniform Electronic Evidence Act, and the United Nations Commission on International Trade Law (UNCITRAL) Model Law on Electronic Commerce. Member countries wishing to make use of the Model Law on Electronic Evidence may choose to do so as a separate piece of legislation; as part of a law on electronic transactions; as amendments to existing laws on evidence; or as part of a process of modernisation of evidence law that concentrates primarily on criminal law matters and business records in their more traditional sense. The Model Law is closely related to the Model Law on Computer and Computer- Related Crime, as well as to the Model Law on Electronic Transactions.

2 \ Model Law on Electronic Evidence Background Law Ministers and Attorney-Generals of Small Commonwealth Jurisdictions, at their 2000 meeting, recognized that common law rules of evidence were not adequate to deal with technological advances and needed to be modernised. They welcomed the convening of an Expert Group to develop model legislation on electronic evidence to address the needs of small Commonwealth jurisdictions. The Expert Group examined the admissibility of electronic evidence and the question whether the rules that apply to other forms of documentary evidence can be applied in a like manner to electronic documents. The outcomes of the work of the Expert Group in the form of the draft Model Law on Electronic Evidence were submitted to Commonwealth Law Ministers at their meeting of 18-21 November 2002, held in Kingstown, St Vincent and the Grenadines. Law Ministers commended the Model Law for use by those Commonwealth member countries seeking assistance in the development of an appropriate legislative framework. Law Ministers noted that the Model Law on Electronic Evidence was specifically required by Law Ministers and Attorneys General of Small Commonwealth Jurisdictions to adopt system reliability as the basic test for admissibility of evidence. Law Ministers further observed that the Model Law adapts the general rules of evidence to meet new technology possibilities.

Model Law on Electronic Evidence \ 3 Model Law on Electronic Evidence AN ACT to make provision for the legal recognition of electronic records and to facilitate the admission of such records into evidence in legal proceedings. BE IT ENACTED by the Parliament [name of legislature] of [name of country] as follows: Short Title 1. This Act may be cited as the Electronic Evidence Act, 2002 Interpretation 2. In this Act, data means representations, in any form, of information or concepts; electronic record means data that is recorded or stored on any medium in or by a computer system or other similar device and that can be read or perceived by a person or a computer system or other similar device. It includes a display, print out or other output of that data. electronic records system includes the computer system or other similar device by or in which data is recorded or stored, and any procedures related to the recording and preservation of electronic records. legal proceeding means a civil, criminal or administrative proceeding in a court or before a tribunal, board or commission. General Admissibility and Scope of Act 3. Nothing in the rules of evidence shall apply to deny the admissibility of an electronic record in evidence on the sole ground that it is an electronic record. 4. (1) This Act does not modify any common law or statutory rule relating to the admissibility or records, except the rules relating to authentication and best evidence. (2) A court may have regard to evidence adduced under this Act in applying any common law or statutory rule relating to the admissibility of records. Authentication 5. The person seeking to introduce an electronic record in any legal proceeding has the burden of proving its authenticity by evidence capable of supporting a finding that the electronic record is what the person claims it to be.

4 \ Model Law on Electronic Evidence Application of Best Evidence Rule 6. (1) In any legal proceeding, subject to subsection (2), where the best evidence rule is applicable in respect of electronic record, the rule is satisfied on proof of the integrity of the electronic records system in or by which the data was recorded or stored. (2) In any legal proceeding, where an electronic record in the form of printout has been manifestly or consistently acted on, relied upon, or used as the record of the information recorded or stored on the printout, the printout is the record for the purposes of the best evidence rule. Presumption of Integrity 7. In the absence of evidence to the contrary, the integrity of the electronic records system in which an electronic record is recorded or stored is presumed in any legal proceeding: a) where evidence is adduced that supports a finding that at all material times the computer system or other similar device was operating properly, or if not, that in any respect in which it was not operating properly or out of operation, the integrity of the record was not affected by such circumstances, and there are no other reasonable grounds to doubt the integrity of the record. b) where it is established that the electronic record was recorded or stored by a party to the proceedings who is adverse in interest to the party seeking to introduce it; or c) where it is established that the electronic record was recorded or stored in the usual and ordinary course of business by a person who is not a party to the proceedings and who did not record or store it under the control of the party seeking to introduce the record. Standards 8. For the purpose of determining under any rule of law whether an electronic record is admissible, evidence may be presented in respect of any standard, procedure, usage or practice on how electronic records are to be recorded or preserved, having regard to the type of business or endeavour that used, recorded or preserved the electronic record and the nature and purpose of the electronic record. Proof by Affidavit 9. The matters referred to in sections 6, 7, and 8 may be established by an affidavit given to the best of the deponent s knowledge or belief. Cross Examination 10. (1) A deponent of an affidavit referred to in section 9 that has been introduced in evidence may be cross-examined as of right by a party to the proceedings who is adverse in interest to the party who has introduced the affidavit or has caused the affidavit to be introduced. (2) Any party to the proceedings may, with leave of the court, cross-examine a person referred to in subsection 7(c).

Model Law onelectronic Evidence \ 5 Agreement on Admissibility of Electronic Records 11. (1) Unless otherwise provided in any other statute, an electronic record is admissible, subject to the discretion of the court, if the parties to the proceedings have expressly agreed at any time that its admissibility may not be disputed. (2) Notwithstanding subsection (1), an agreement between the parties on admissibility of an electronic record does not render the record admissible in a criminal proceeding on behalf of the prosecution if at the time the agreement was made, the accused person or any of the persons accused in the proceeding was not represented by a solicitor. Admissibility of Electronic Signature 12. (1) Where a rule of evidence requires a signature, or provides for certain consequences if a document is not signed, an electronic signature satisfies that rule of law or avoids those consequences. (2) An electronic signature may be proved in any manner, including by showing that a procedure existed by which it is necessary for a person, in order to proceed further with a transaction, to have executed a symbol or security procedure for the purpose of verifying that an electronic record is that of the person.

P15370_7