Don t Step in It! Premises Liability Law in Wisconsin: What to Look Out for Including the Statute of Repose, Safe Place Law, and Recreational Immunity

Similar documents
FEDERAL LANDOWNER LIABILITY FOR INJURED RECREATIONAL USERS (1) WHETHER ALLEGED NEGLIGENT CONDUCT INVOLVES AN ELEMENT OF JUDGMENT OR CHOICE.

CODE OFFICIAL LIABILITY

Drake University Agricultural Law Center Edward Cox Staff Attorney February 22, 2013

NOVEMBER 2010 LAW REVIEW MUNICIPAL IMMUNITY FOR FAILED 911 SURF RESCUE

CLOSING INSTRUCTIONS. this case. As I mentioned at the beginning of the trial, you must keep an open

How to Use Tort Immunity to the Advantage of Your Local Government

MOTORIST DROWNS IN RETENTION POND ADJACENT TO HIGHWAY

Tort Reform (2) The pleading specifically asserts that the medical care has and all medical records

Sources of Liability

NEGLIGENCE. All four of the following must be demonstrated for a legal claim of negligence to be successful:

Safety & Liability Does pursuit of safety expose an agency to liability? liability for action liability for inaction liability for trying something ne

STATE SOVEREIGN IMMUNITY & TORT CAPS. Kirk Mylander, CIS General Counsel Gary Wickert, Matthiesen, Wickert & Lehrer, S.C.

Strict Liability and Product Liability PRODUCT LIABILITY WARRANTY LAW

Don t Forget the Immunity Offered by the Recreational Use of Land and Water Areas Act

DECEMBER 2016 LAW REVIEW FATEFUL DIVE INTO "CLOSED" PARK POND POOL

Research, Writing, and Analysis BRIEFING A CASE

A Duty To Warn For The Other Manufacturer's Product?

How to Keep Your Clients (and Yourself!) From Getting Sued for Defamation

Georgia Law Impacting Agritourism Operations

LIABILITY UNDER THE TEXAS TORT CLAIMS ACT

AIA Government Affairs Good Samaritan State Statute Compendium

NEW JERSEY LAW REVISION COMMISSION. Final Report Relating to. Equine Activities Liability Act. May 22, 2014

Board of Claims -- Limitation on damage awards -- Hearing officers -- Asbestos related claims. (1) A Board of Claims, composed of the members

2017 IL App (1st)

JULY 1998 NRPA LAW REVIEW SPORT LEAGUE FEES: EXCEPTION TO RECREATIONAL USE STATUTE IMMUNITY?

Commonwealth of Kentucky Court of Appeals

Saskatchewan Association of Rural Municipalities

Protection for the Recreational Property Landowner:

NO CV IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS, TEXAS. CITY OF DALLAS, Defendant/Appellant,

Legal Business. Overview Of Court Procedure. Memoranda on legal and business issues and concerns for multiple industry and business communities

STRICT LIABILITY. (1) involves serious potential harm to persons or property,

California Bar Examination

PARK FIREWORKS DISPLAY INJURES BOY WEEKS LATER, OFF SITE

Argued September 26, Decided. Before Judges Fuentes and Accurso.

TABLE OF CONTENTS 2.1 GENERAL RIGHT OF ACTION UNDER C.R.S LIMITED RIGHT OF ACTION UNDER C.R.S

Work Based Learning & Safety. Work Based Learning & Safety. Work Based Learning & Safety. Do you remember this incident! WORK BASED LEARNING & SAFETY

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT

Criminal and Civil Liability For Environmental Health and Safety Professionals

Courtesy of RosenfeldInjuryLawyers.com (888)

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS COUNTY DEPARTMENT, LAW DIVISION. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. ) ) ) ) ) ) COMPLAINT AT LAW

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 12/06/2010 INDEX NO /2010

STATE OF NEW JERSEY LAW REVISION COMMISSION. Equine Activities Liability Act ( Equine Act ) December 10, 2012

Vargas v. Monte DRAFTERS POINT SHEET

Florida Jury Instructions Negligent Misrepresentation

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE June 9, 2009 Session

OCTOBER 1986 LAW REVIEW REC USE LAW APPLIES TO PUBLIC LAND IN NY, NE, ID, OH, & WA. James C. Kozlowski, J.D., Ph.D James C.

JUNE 2007 LAW REVIEW COMMERCIAL WAIVER SIGNED BY PARENT

Motion for Summary Judgment (Judge Randy Hammock)

IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF LYCOMING COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA

Ethics Training Wisconsin Asphalt Pavement Association December 2, 2014

OCCUPIERS LIABILITY ACT

ARIZONA REVISED STATUTES TITLE 33. PROPERTY CHAPTER 3. LANDLORD AND TENANT

Plaintiff, DECISION AND ORDER ON MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT. This matter is before the court on motions for summary judgment by both

In the Court of Appeals of Georgia

ROBBY NIESE OPINION BY v. Record No JUSTICE DONALD W. LEMONS June 7, 2002 CITY OF ALEXANDRIA

ANSWER A TO ESSAY QUESTION 5

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT

THE LOCAL GOVERNMENTAL AND GOVERNMENTAL EMPLOYEES TORT IMMUNITY ACT UPDATE

JANUARY 1998, NRPA LAW REVIEW DANGEROUS TREES POSE A FORESEEABLE RISK OF INJURY

LEGAL RESEARCH, ANALYSIS, AND ADVOCACY FOR ATTORNEYS

3:18-cv MGL Date Filed 07/31/18 Entry Number 1 Page 1 of 14 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA COLUMBIA DIVISION

LAW REVIEW SEPTEMBER 1992 PLAYGROUND LIABILITY FOR EXPOSED CONCRETE FOOTING UNDER MONKEY BARS IN STATE PARK

Boston College Journal of Law & Social Justice

Provisions of the Health Payment Reform Act Affecting Medical Malpractice Litigation

LAW REVIEW JUNE 1992 RAINWATER ACCUMULATED IN CLOSED CITY POOL RAISES ATTRACTIVE NUISANCE RISK

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON DIVISION II

Video Course Evaluation Form. My Name is: Name of Course: My Street address: Address:

George Mason University School of Recreation, Health & Tourism Court Reports SLOWE v. PIKE CREEK COURT CLUB, INC. (Del. Sup. Ct.

Liability Risks for After-Hours Use of Public School Property to Reduce Obesity: MISSISSIPPI

LAW REVIEW JUNE 1989 PLAYGROUND SUPERVISION QUESTIONED IN EYE INJURY CASES

Climbing & Occupiers Liability. reassurance for landowners, managers & users

V.-E. DEPOSITION INSTRUCTIONS

STATE OF RHODE ISLAND

CITY OF NORTH SALT LAKE

Present: Koontz, Kinser, Goodwyn, Millette, and Mims, JJ., and Carrico and Lacy, S.JJ.

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE TWELFTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT WILL COUNTY, ILLINOIS ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) COMPLAINT AT LAW

Please note: Retaining walls less than five feet (5') in height do not require a building permit.

STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS

3:05-cv MBS Date Filed 05/08/13 Entry Number 810 Page 1 of 16

Commonwealth of Kentucky Court of Appeals

Iron Gate Exhibition

Circuit Court, D. New Jersey.

JUNE 2016 LAW REVIEW LEGAL RELATIONSHIP SHAPES AED USE REQUIREMENT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF UTAH, CENTRAL DIVISION

Are the IPI Instructions on Construction Negligence an Accurate Statement of Illinois Law?

STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS

ONTARIO SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE DAVID CARMICHAEL. -and-

Standard Conditions of Sale and Terms of Delivery of

McCabe v Avalon Bay Communities Inc 2018 NY Slip Op 33108(U) November 30, 2018 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: /2016 Judge:

DEFENDING HIGH EXPOSURE DANGEROUS CONDITION LAWSUITS

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF MONTGOMERY COUNTY, ALABAMA

CITY OF KELOWNA BYLAW NO REVISED: December 4, 2017 CONSOLIDATED FOR CONVENIENCE TO INCLUDE BYLAWS NO. 9082, 9123, 9315, 10821, & BL11510

Farina v City of New York 2013 NY Slip Op 31393(U) May 23, 2013 Sup Ct, Queens County Docket Number: 24061/10 Judge: Kevin Kerrigan Republished from

STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS

STATE OF LOUISIANA PLAINTIFFS VERSUS

SENATE, No STATE OF NEW JERSEY. 218th LEGISLATURE INTRODUCED FEBRUARY 26, 2018

OCTOBER 2012 LAW REVIEW OBVIOUS TREE HAZARD ON PARK SLEDDING HILL

LAW REVIEW JANUARY 1987 MUST LANDOWNER PROTECT MOONING REVELER FROM HIMSELF? James C. Kozlowski, J.D., Ph.D James C.

Torts. Louisiana Law Review. Wex S. Malone. Volume 25 Number 1 Symposium Issue: Louisiana Legislation of 1964 December Repository Citation

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 11/04/ :40 PM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 11/04/2016

Transcription:

` 2015 WSSFC Substantive Track Session 11 Don t Step in It! Premises Liability Law in Wisconsin: What to Look Out for Including the Statute of Repose, Safe Place Law, and Recreational Immunity Jonathan P. Groth, Groth Law Firm S.C., Brookfield

About the Presenter... Jon Groth is the owner of Groth Law Firm, S.C. a plaintiff's personal injury firm helping injured victims across Wisconsin. A highly competitive practice area, Groth Law Firm, S.C. succeeds with the help of its superior staff, internet marketing and referrals. Groth Law Firm, S.C. s has two attorneys and 2 full time paralegals along with part time staff. Mr. Groth is a frequent lecturer to local and state bar associations on topics related to personal injury litigation. Mr. Groth has been active in the State Bar serving as the Chair of the 2010 Wisconsin Solo and Small Firm Conference.

How to make friends and clients from nonclients. Analyze a case and be truthful about the viability of the case from the outset. Damages may be GIGANTIC if no liability the law firm will lose money. Legal bullying doesn t work. Nationwide lists are everywhere. Be careful what you find for free. Free doesn t always equal accurate. For example injury SOL in WI is 3 years NOT 2 per a certain popular cite. Ask members of AAJ or the local Association for Justice. Do the research. 1

1. SOL specify the time period within which a cause of action must be commenced after it has accrued. 2. Limitation of action is a right as well as a remedy. 3. Public policy determination. a. Discourages stale and fraudulent claims; b. Allows meritorious claims 1 SOLs establish time frames within which claims must be initiated after the cause of action accrues; 2 Statutes of repose limits time periods based on the date of act or omission and can toll/run before the injury is discovered or has accrued. This bears no relation to the accrual of the cause of action. 2

Claims for injuries including safe place claims resulting from improvements to real property asserted more than a certain number of years after completion of the improvement are barred. Action against a surveyor for negligent surveying are to be brought no more than 6 years after the completion of the survey. 1) No Gait Issues (no pre existing) 2) Perfect vision or wearing corrections 2) Flat Shoes with all weather tread 3) Commercial Building 4) Visiting for the first time 5) In the building NOT outside 6) If outside better if private walk 7) Not there for recreation 8) Nothing obvious about risk 1) When did this happen? a. SOL, Notice of Circumstances 2) Where did this happen? a) Commercial Property, private home, duplex? 3) Do YOU know what caused the injury? a) Witnesses, pictures? 4) What were you wearing? a) Eyeglasses, did clothes soak up any liquid? 3

Pictures of the Site Have an investigator go to site to get pictures asap or during similar conditions Interview witnesses OSHA/Industry Standard Violations? Befriend a good premises expert to ask these questions. Objective Injuries? (risk/reward of pursuing the claim) Video? Request for spoilation argument later. Ask neighbors about videos Encourage land owners to allow the public use of their property for recreational purposes. Response to landowners fears that they would be responsible for injuries sustained by recreational users. Initially, liberally construed in favor of property owners. Narrowed liberalism over time. 4

Eliminated common law duties Statutory: a. no owner and no officer, employee, or agent of an owner owes to any person who enters the owner s property to engage in a recreational activity: i. a duty to keep the property safe for recreational activities; ii. a duty to inspect the property; iii. a duty to give warning of an unsafe condition, use or activity on the property. b.no owner and no officer, employee, or agent of an owner is liable for the death of, any injury to, or any death or injury caused by, a person engaging in a recreational activity on the owner s property. Owners Occupants Person Governmental body Non profit organization Gov t body with recreational agreement with another. Club event on municipal land? Village fair on public fairgrounds? Most Frequently Litigated Review Portions of Statute Exceptions: Team Sports Pecuniary benefit 5

Shields public officials from personal liability for injuries resulting from the negligent performance of acts within the scope of their public office. No Immunity Malicious, willful and intentional Ministerial (non-discretionary duties) Policy to plow or salt at certain times if not done then liable Known present danger. Discretionary within the scope of immunity Ministerial not protected Statutes Regulations Rules Policies Practices of the body Duty of Every Employer to furnish a place of employment that is as safe as the nature of the premises reasonably permits. Heightened the ordinary care duties of the common law. Safeguards employees and frequenters. Trespassers are NOT protected. Safety by abiding by local codes or standards. 6

Once the Safe Place responsibilities attach they cannot be delegated. An owner or employer cannot close their eyes when they have the right of supervision and control. Chapter 101 creates and confers jurisdiction over safety issues in Sec. 101.02 (15). Local Codes and regulations may apply as long as they do not conflict with department orders. Industry, Labor and Human Relations standards (ILHR) OSHA Industry standards (established through expert testimony. Questions about specific fact scenarios? Examples: email me e.g. Jury Instruction and Special Verdicts 7

www.grothlawfirm.com Facebook.com/grothlawfirm 877 375 7001 (phone) 877 375 7001 (fax) Jon@grothlawfirm.com 8