Case: 1:15-cr Document #: 59 Filed: 01/13/16 Page 1 of 7 PageID #:172

Similar documents
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION

Case: 1:12-cr Document #: 297 Filed: 11/15/18 Page 1 of 15 PageID #:2421

Case 5:17-cr JLV Document 51 Filed 10/23/18 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 221 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH DAKOTA

Case 1:12-cv Document 1 Filed 07/18/12 Page 1 of 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case 1:16-cr AJT Document 39 Filed 10/21/16 Page 1 of 4 PageID# 126

Case: 1:12-cr Document #: 133 Filed: 09/11/14 Page 1 of 10 PageID #:733

Case 1:08-cr JLA Document 10 Filed 05/19/2008 Page 1 of 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

DEFENDANT RUDOLPH FRATTO S SENTENCING POSITION PAPER

Case: 1:17-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 06/26/17 Page 1 of 8 PageID #:1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Case: 1:16-cr Document #: 47 Filed: 03/13/18 Page 1 of 6 PageID #:284

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE. JUDGMENT IN A CRIMINAL CASE (For Offenses Committed On or After November 1, 1987)

Case 5:17-cr JLV Document 46 Filed 10/02/18 Page 1 of 8 PageID #: 131 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH DAKOTA

Case 3:04-cr JAH Document 309 Filed 01/17/13 PageID.1104 Page 1 of 6

Case 5:14-cr Document 589 Filed 04/07/16 Page 1 of 7 PageID #: 15273

Case 2:16-cr LA Filed 10/24/18 Page 1 of 12 Document 89

United States District Court

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT Northern District of California

United States v. Abdurasul Juraboev, et al. Criminal Docket No. 15-M-172

Case 1:13-cr LJO-SKO Document 151 Filed 03/03/14 Page 1 of 7

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA. v. : CRIMINAL NO

Case: 1:09-cr DAP Doc #: 72 Filed: 05/11/12 1 of 14. PageID #: 608

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION PLEA AGREEMENT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI WESTERN DIVISION GOVERNMENT S RESPONSE TO DEFENDANT S SENTENCING MEMORANDUM

IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Case 3:15-cr AJB Document 11 Filed 06/10/15 Page 1 of 4

Case: 1:14-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 09/29/14 Page 1 of 9 PageID #:1

Case 1:17-cr ABJ Document 525 Filed 02/23/19 Page 1 of 25 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. Crim. No.

Case 1:10-cr JFK Document 31 Filed 11/23/11 Page 1 of 12 SENTENCING MEMORANDUM

Case 8:07-cr AG Document 141 Filed 01/11/11 Page 1 of 6 Page ID #:2159. United States District Court Central District of California

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION

THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS CUYAHOGA COUNTY, OHIO ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 8:15-cr JLS Document 59 Filed 03/09/18 Page 1 of 6 Page ID #:300 United States District Court Central District of California

CARBON COUNTY CUSTODY Intake: COMPLAINT/MODIFICATION/CONTEMPT Docket Number: Name: Date of Birth:

PLEA AGREEMENT THOMAS QUINN

Case 2:08-cr DDP Document 37 Filed 10/19/2009 Page 1 of 5. United States District Court Central District of California

Case 6:16-cr FPG Document 32 Filed 01/25/17 Page 1 of 10

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT. No

IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF LYCOMING COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA CRIMINAL DIVISION

The United States of America, by and through JULIE BURNHAM. PORTER, Attorney for the United States, Acting Under Authority Conferred

Case: 1:03-cr Document #: 205 Filed: 10/06/10 Page 1 of 7 PageID #:535

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Title 17-A: MAINE CRIMINAL CODE

Case4:13-cr YGR Document31 Filed02/24/14 Page1 of 8

Okla, N (Tulsa) Branch: Tulsa, Oklahoma Defendant: 650

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF JACKSON COUNTY, MISSOURI AT KANSAS CITY COMPLAINT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO CR-ZLOCH/ROSENBAUM CASE NO CR-ZLOCH/ROSENBAUM

DONALD SCOTT TAYLOR, is convicted of one or both of the capital offenses relating

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA

Follow this and additional works at:

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI WESTERN DIVISION

USA v. Sosa-Rodriguez

IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS FOR HUNTINGDON COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA CIVIL ACTION - LAW

United States District Court

Attorneys for the United States UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case 2:09-cr R Document 25 Filed 12/10/2009 Page 1 of 24

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION

Case: 1:15-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 01/23/15 Page 1 of 10 PageID #:1

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF INDIANA

Case 1:15-cr CMH Document 15 Filed 08/21/15 Page 1 of 6 PageID# 71 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA

Case 2:12-cr TJS Document 11 Filed 07/02/14 Page 1 of 11 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Case 2:15-cr FMO Document 52 Filed 04/25/16 Page 1 of 17 Page ID #:295

Follow this and additional works at:

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

USA v. Luis Felipe Callego

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI WESTERN DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Case 1:12-cv RC Document 1 Filed 11/08/12 Page 1 of 11 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF CARBON COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA CRIMINAL

Case 1:11-cr RWS -CCH Document 50 Filed 02/07/12 Page 1 of 5

Case 1:16-cr LO Document 48 Filed 02/02/17 Page 1 of 15 PageID# 248 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA

Case 8:16-cr JLS Document 59 Filed 05/04/18 Page 1 of 6 Page ID #:269 United States District Court Central District of California

Case 8:06-cr DOC Document 43 Filed 02/08/2008 Page 1 of 5. United States District Court Central District of California

How the Federal Sentencing Guidelines Work: An Abridged Overview

Court of Appeals of Ohio

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA CHARLOTTE DIVISION 3:14cr229 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Case 2:10-cr MAM Document 178 Filed 08/27/12 Page 1 of 22 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Case 2:16-cr DGC Document 121 Filed 11/09/18 Page 1 of 11

Case: 3:16-cr Document #: 13 Filed: 06/30/16 Page 1 of 11 PageID #:132 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

USA v. William Hoffa, Jr.

Case 3:10-cr JAH Document 19 Filed 06/14/10 Page 1 of 6

Case: 1:06-cr Document #: 82 Filed: 10/01/08 Page 1 of 9 PageID #:547

vs. : CR : FREDERICK POPOWICH, : Post-Sentence Motion Defendant : OPINION AND ORDER Before the Court is Defendant s Post-Sentence Motion.

Case: 4:07-cr RGK-RGK Document #: 176 Date Filed: 08/21/09 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF KANSAS TRANSCRIPT OF SENTENCING HEARING BEFORE THE HONORABLE CARLOS MURGUIA, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI WESTERN DIVISION

Case: 5:14-cr JRA Doc #: 83 Filed: 02/07/15 1 of 5. PageID #: 611

Case 2:13-cr TJH Document 59 Filed 03/17/15 Page 1 of 5 Page ID #:280. United States District Court Central District of California

Case 1:08-cr RCL Document 24 Filed 07/13/15 Page 1 of 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

: CP-41-CR vs. : : : SETH REEDER, : dated January 12, 2015, in which the court summarily denied Appellant s motion for

PETITION FOR CONTEMPT OF A CUSTODY ORDER

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Criminal Courts Building Suite 302 Riverhead, New York Garden City, New York 11530

Case: 1:18-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 02/26/18 Page 1 of 6 PageID #:1

Transcription:

Case: 1:15-cr-00149 Document #: 59 Filed: 01/13/16 Page 1 of 7 PageID #:172 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) No. 15 CR 149 vs. ) ) Judge John Z. Lee, JONAS EDMONDS, ) presiding ) Defendant. ) DEFENDANT S SENTENCING MEMORNADUM NOW COMES the Defendant, Jonas Edmonds, by and through his attorney James A. Graham and files this Sentencing Memorandum, and in support states as follows: Defendant pled to two counts contained in the superseding information. Defendant pled guilty to Count 1, which charges him with conspiring to provide material support to a foreign terrorist organization, specifically the Islamic State or Iraq and the Levant, in violation of Title 18 U.S.C. 2339B(a)(1) and Count 2 of making a materially false statement to a law enforcement officer regarding an offense involving international terrorism, in violation of Title 18, U.S.C. 1001(a)(2). The first count carries a maximum statutory sentence of 15 years. The second count carries a maximum statutory sentence of 8 years. The parties have entered into an 11(c)(1)(C) plea agreement which calls for a sentence of 252 months, or 21 years in custody. 1

Case: 1:15-cr-00149 Document #: 59 Filed: 01/13/16 Page 2 of 7 PageID #:173 The Defendant entered into this agreement to ward off other charges that were being considered by the government, and his consideration that if other charges were brought, those charges would have exposed Jonas to a substantially higher sentence. As set forth in the Plea Agreement, Guideline 2M5.3(a), 2M5.3(b)(1)(E), 3A1.2, 3A1.4(a), and 3C1.1 would have had the cumulative effect of placing him in an Offense Level of 42 (after acceptance) and Guideline 3A1.4(b) would have driven his Criminal History Category to a VI. See Defendant s Plea Agreement page 10-12. These calculations would have placed the Defendant in a Guideline range of 360 months to Life, after a plea. Instead, Jonas Edmonds decided to enter into this agreement. Under the terms of the agreement the Court can either accept or reject the agreement. If the Court accepts the agreement, the incarceration component of the agreement cannot be changed or altered. That agreement is for Jonas Edmonds to be sentenced to 252 months in custody, or 21 years. Facts About the Offense: Jonas Edmonds pled guilty to providing material support, and providing a materially false statement to a law enforcement officer, however the elephant in the room, the matter that is impossible to overlook, is the allegation that Jonas Edmonds was going to participate in an attack on the National Guard installation located in Joliet, Illinois. Jonas Edmonds emphatically states that he never would have actually 2

Case: 1:15-cr-00149 Document #: 59 Filed: 01/13/16 Page 3 of 7 PageID #:174 gone through with, or participated in an attack on the National Guard installation. He acknowledges that the recordings of him with the undercover FBI employee sound terrible. It is one of the main reasons that he has elected to proceed with this plea. He stands by the position that it was primarily, just bold talk. Jonas Edmonds considers himself a sincere Muslim. He tries to study and faithfully follow his religion. One glaring detour is that prior to his arrest Jonas Edmonds smoked marijuana several times a day. During the course of the recorded conversations he was under the influence of marijuana. The FBI employee role playing as a recruiter and representative of ISIS challenged something in Jonas Edmond, making him want to prove he was a dedicated Muslim man. This placed Jonas Edmonds on the defensive, and brought on a bravado in statements from Jonas that are heard on the undercover recordings. Jonas Edmonds has been extremely upset about the number of the civilian casualties caused by the United State military on Muslim populations in other parts of the world. He has also been affected by the violence perpetrated by ISIS on others, as he has observed on various internet sites. Jonas Edmonds has been seen by various family members in tears after observing some of the violence he has watched over the internet. As a member of the Muslim religion he has received mixed messages as to what exactly his faith requires of him. 3

Case: 1:15-cr-00149 Document #: 59 Filed: 01/13/16 Page 4 of 7 PageID #:175 Jonas Edmonds states some of the statements heard on the tape recordings were fueled by his consistent use of marijuana, and apparent need to prove to the FBI employee that he was in fact a sincere Muslim. Jonas Edmonds points to the following facts that he would like the Court to be aware of; 1) He had dropped Hasan Edmonds off at the airport. It was Jonas understanding that Hasan was on an airplane traveling to Egypt. To the best of Jonas knowledge the person who had the most knowledge about the base, and could have gained easy access to the installation was on a plane leaving the United States; 2) No weapons were arranged for, or procured for any attack. Jonas had no experience with firearms, and was not arranging for, or attempting to train himself on the handling of firearms; 3) No date was discussed or set for any attack; 4) Jonas wore a long bushy beard which was required by followers of his faith. Jonas had no intention of shaving his beard. When arrested he had that same full beard. The beard made it impossible for him to pass himself off as a National Guard member. Jonas Edmonds would reiterate that what was said on the recorded conversations was him spouting off, and though everyone recognizes how serious this matter is, he wants the Court to know that he would never have followed through with any attack on the National Guard installation. Objections to the Presentence Investigation Report: The Defendant in this matter asked the Court to set an expedited sentencing date. As a result the parties have not received a Presentence Investigation Report, and files this memorandum without the benefit of having viewed that report. Objections, if any will have to be filed after the 4

Case: 1:15-cr-00149 Document #: 59 Filed: 01/13/16 Page 5 of 7 PageID #:176 report is completed. Jonas Edmonds Family: Jonas Edmonds has a common law wife, a baby son, and several step children. For purposed of the family s privacy, Counsel will rely on the Presentence Investigation Report setting forth in greater detail the names, ages and current circumstances of Jonas immediate family. Suffice it to say his wife and children stand in support of him. Jonas Expectations During his Incarceration: Jonas Edmonds is being held in custody at the M.C.C. in Chicago. As a result of the nature of the charges he has been required to check in every few hours with the officer on duty. Despite being in custody, Jonas has been required to submit to drug testing several times per week. Jonas expects that these and other special conditions may be a part of his future. See http://web.law.columbia.edu/human-rights-institute/counterterrorism/domesticcounterterrorism/illusion-justice-report pp. 131-163. Jonas has filed a motion asking this Court to recommend a facility close to Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, because it would be close to the location of his wife and children. Defendant understands that the Bureau of Prisons is under no obligation of follow that recommendation, and that their oversight in these kinds of cases may dictate placement elsewhere. However, Jonas would like to stress that his ability to stay in regular contact with his wife and children is very important to him. He would ask, that if the Court could make the recommendations requested, that he would greatly appreciate it. 5

Case: 1:15-cr-00149 Document #: 59 Filed: 01/13/16 Page 6 of 7 PageID #:177 WHEREFORE, Defendant Jonas Edmonds requests that this Court take into consideration the information listed above in fashioning an appropriate sentence. Defendant requests the Court accept the plea agreement and impose the 252 month sentence requested by the parties. Respectfully submitted, s/ James A. Graham Attorney for JONAS EDMONDS James A. Graham (ARDC 6184279) Attorney at Law 53 W. Jackson Blvd. Suite 703 Chicago, Illinois 60604 (312) 922-3777 Facsimile: (312) 663-5386 e-mail address: jagraham.law@mac.com 6

Case: 1:15-cr-00149 Document #: 59 Filed: 01/13/16 Page 7 of 7 PageID #:178 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I, James A. Graham, an attorney, certify that I shall cause to be served a copy of Defendant s SENTENCING MEMORANDUM upon the following individual(s) by personal delivery, this 13th day of January, 2016. TO: Barry Jonas John Kness Asst. United States Attorney 219 S. Dearborn St. 5th Floor, North Chicago, Illinois 60604 s/ James A. Graham Attorney for JONAS EDMONDS James A. Graham (ARDC 6184279) Attorney at Law 53 W. Jackson Blvd. Suite 703 Chicago, Illinois 60604 (312) 922-3777 Facsimile: (312) 663-5386 e-mail address: jagraham.law@mac.com 7