IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION

Similar documents
EEOC v. River View Coal, LLC

EEOC v. Supervalu Holdings, Inc.

EEOC v. Pacific Airport Services, Inc.,

CONSENT DECREE;~:~~~~~ s; ~~~: c:? The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission ("Commission" or "EEi:;~ins0\Ited

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Bob Watson Chevrolet

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT. FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLIll~ STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DIVISION CONSENT DECREE THE LITIGATION

U.S. EEOC v Promens USA, Inc. and Bonar Plastics, Inc.

EEOC v. RSG Forest Products Inc. dba Estacada Lumber Co.

EEOC v. Altec Industries

Case 5:07-cv VAP-JCR Document 11 Filed 06/14/2008 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA EASTERN DIVISION

EEOC v. Bice of Chicago, et al.

Case 1:16-cv CCB Document 98 Filed 06/28/16 06/23/16 Page 1 of 14 11

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ~ ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) THE LmGATION

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. The Gehl Corporation d/b/a The Gehl Group

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Plaintiff, v. Studley Products, Inc. and Wildwood Industries, Inc., Defendants.

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Maharaja Hospitality Inc, d/b/a Quality Inn by Choice Hotels

EEOC v. Mcdonald's Restaurants of California, Inc.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI WESTERN DIVISION. Plaintiff, CV-W-2-ECF

EEOC v. JEC Enterprises, Inc., d/b/a McDonalds

United States Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Plaintiff, v. Jetson Midwest Mailers, Inc., Defendant.

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Dutch Farms, Inc.

EEOC v. Applegate Holdings LLC

Cornell University ILR School. Judge Karen E. Schreier

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Plaintiff, v. Mint Julep Restaurant Operations, LLC d/b/a Cheddar's Casual Cafe, Defendant.

EEOC v. Dillard's, Inc

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission et al. v. Majesty Maintenance, Inc.

EEOC & Suzanne Whitty v. Mount Carmel, LLC, and Benedictine Health System, et al.

Case 1:11-cv NLH -AMD Document 61 Filed 01/24/13 Page 1 of 12 PageID #: 211 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

Case 5:11-cv F Document 13 Filed 01/24/12 Page 1 of 9

EEOC and David Marcotte and Robert Kerouac v. Federal Express Corp.

EEOC and Maria Torres v. The Restaurant Company dba Perkins

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA ASHEVILLE DIVISION

EEOC & Wolansky v. United Healthcare of Florida, Inc.

)

EEOC v. CMC Service of Chicago, LLC d/b/a Great Clips for Hair

EEOC v. Northwest Savings Bank

Case 1:11-cv JKB Document 5 Filed 07/06/11 Page 1 of 36

United States of America v. The City of Belen, New Mexico

District 2 Public Health

EEOC v. Merrill Pine Ridge, LLC

EEOC v. Moka Shoe Corporation

EEOC & Aimee Boss and Morgan Hagedon v. Bodega Bars USA, LLC d/b/a Mosaic Restaurant

EEOC v. Oglethorpe University

EEOC v. U-Haul International Inc.

EEOC v. Jolet II, Inc., d/b/a Thompson Care Center

EEOC v. Stephens Institute d/b/a The Academy of Art College

IN TIlE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT, FOR TIlE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION. Judge Gettleman CONSENT DECREE THE LITIGATION

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Revolution Studios and Smile Productions, LLC

Case 2:03-cv BBD-sta Document 14 Filed 08/05/2004 Page 1 of 7

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA Equal Employment Opportunity ) Commission, ) Case No.: CV PHX-DAE

EEOC and Darmo et al. v. Pinnacle Nissan, Inc. et al.

EEOC v. Tropiano Transportation Services, Inc.

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Japanese Food Solutions Inc., d/b/a Minado Restaurant

EEOC v. Original Hot Dog Shops, Inc. doing business as Original Hot Dog Shop, Food Gallery Original, Inc. doing business as Original Hot Dog Shop

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CONSENT DECREE

EEOC v. Consolidated Stores, Inc. d/b/a Big Lots

) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) The United States Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (the "Commission" or

EEOC v. Lawry's Retaurants, Inc,, d/b/a Lawry's The Prime Rib, Five Crowns, and Tam O'Shanter Inn

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT ~~"A"!tOl'T~'CTCOURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEX~eRQUE, New MI!XICO ORDER FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE

EEOC v. Brink's Incorporated

Case 2:01-cv MLM Document 59 Filed 11/20/2002 Page 1 of 16

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT. lj'lhed States FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS E,.'/';~rn DiStrict. HOUSTON DIVISION CONSENT DECREE

EEOC, Christopher, Bhend, and Chamara v. National Education Association, National Education Association - Alaska

EEOC v. Ealge Wings Industries, Inc.

EEOC & Rodriguez, et al. v. Dynamic Medical Services, Inc.

Case 3:05-cv HTW-LRA Document 82 Filed 04/20/2007 Page 1 of 7

THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS. Plaintiff, Defendant. CONSENT DECREE

EEOC v. Fleming, Inc., d/b/a J. Edward's

EEOC v. Grimmway Enterprises, Inc., d/b/a Grimmway Farms; Esparza Enterprises, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA. v. CONSENT DECREE INTRODUCTION

EEOC v. John Wieland Homes and Neighborhoods, Inc.

EEOC v. NEA-Alaska, Inc.

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Sherree Salter, et al., v. The Shoe Show of Rocky Mount, Inc., Andre Jones

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. American Seafoods Company

EEOC, et al v Lafayette College, et al.,

EEOC v. Hannon's Food Services of Jackson Inc (d/b/a Kentucky Fried Chicken)

IllY _ UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY ) CIVIL NO. COO-16S1 Z 10 COJ\.

EEOC v. Wal-Mart Stores d/b/a Sam s Club

Case 2:01-cv DLG Document 30 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/08/2002 Page 1 of 10

US v Matagorda County Decree UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS GALVESTON DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Rochdale Village, Inc.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CONSENT DECREE

EEOC v. Parker Palm Springs Hotel

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Betsy Ross Flag Girl, Inc. d/b/a Betsy Ross Flag Girl and Barjac Company

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. American Airlines, Inc., and Transport Workers Union Local 501

EEOC v. Scrub Inc. Cornell University ILR School. Judge Susan Cox

EEOC & Mitchel, et al., v. Allied Aviation Services, Inc., Allied Aviation Fueling of Dallas, LP, Allied Aviation Fueling Company of Texas, Inc.

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Plaintiff, v. Lutheran Social Services of Southern California, Defendant.

EEOC v. Pass and Seymour, Inc. and Kennmark Group, Ltd. (Consent Decree as to Pass and Seymour)

EEOC v. KCD Construction, Inc.

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, et al., v. White House Home for Adults

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIR E CONSENT DECREE

EEOC v. Mason County Forest Products, LLC

EEOC v. BJ's Wholesale Club, Inc.

EEOC v. Renhill Group Inc.

EEOC v. Michoacan Seafood Group. LLC

EEOC v. Hiten Hospitality L.L.C. d/b/a Family Motor Inn and Jay Kishan Hospitality, Inc. and Mike Patel

EEOC and Thornton, et al, v. University of Phoenix, Inc. and Apollo Group, Inc.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NORTH DAKOTA ) ) ) ) INTRODUCTION

Transcription:

cr IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION, v. Plaintiff, P.J.R. ENTERPRISES, INC. d/b/a JIFFY LUBE, Defendant., /0. EASTERN DIVISION.. CIVIL ACTION NO. t :04-CV-07736 -- --. _ 1 CONSENT DECREE The United States Equal Employment Opportunity Commission ("the Commission" commenced this action against PJ.R. Enterprises, Inc. d/b/a! JiffY Lube ("PJR" pursuant to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and Title I of the Civil Rights Act of 1991 ("Title VII" to address allegations that PJR subjected Virginia C. Petrov ("Petrov'" and a class of similarly situated female employees to sexual harassment. The Commission and PJR stipulate to the Court's jurisdiction over the parties. Further, the Commission and PJR desire to resolve Civil Action No.1 :04-CV-07736 without the burden and expense of further litigation, and without any admission of guilt, fault or liability by PJR. As a result, and based on the pleadings and the record as a whole, the Court finds that: (i the Court has jurisdiction over the parties and the subject matter of this action; (ii the purpose and provisions of Title VII will be promoted and effectuated by the entry of this Decree; and (iii this Decree resolves all the matters in controversy between the parties as provided in paragraphs 1 through 13 below.

IT IS THEREFORE ADJUDGED, ORDERED AND DECREED as follows: I. In all matters arising from or relating to employment at its facilities, PIR and its officers, agents, employees, successors, and assigns, and all of those in active concert or participation with them, or any of them, shall not engage in any employment practice which unlawfully discriminates on the basis of sex against an employee or applicant under Title VII. Prohibited discrimination includes, but is not limited to, subjecting an employee to sexual harassment. 2. ANTI-RETALIATION: PJR and its officers, agents, employees, successors, assigns, and all those in active concert or participation with them, or any of them, shall not engage in reprisal or retaliation of any kind against any person because such person: [i opposed any practice made unlawful under Title VII; [ii filed a charge of discrimination with the Commission or a state agency or testified or participated in any manner in any investigation, proceeding, or hearing under Title VII; [iii requested or received relief in accordance with this Decree; [iii participated in any manner in this action or in the investigation giving rise to this action; or [iv asserted any rights under this Decree. 3. NOTICE POSTING: PJR agrees to post the Employee Notice (attached to this Decree as Appendix A in conspicuous locations visible to applicants and employees at its facilities. Said Notice shall remain posted throughout the term of this Decree. During the term of this Decree, PIR shall monitor all posted Notices for wear and damage. PIR shall replace any damaged or worn Notice with one that is identical to that found in Appendix A. 4. MONETARY SETTLEMENT: In settlement of the Commission's lawsuit, PIR 2

agrees to pay to Petrov, or to her heirs and assigns in the event of Petro v's death, the cumulative sum of$6,000.00. PJR shall issue Petrov's check by certified mail to the payee's address within ten (10 business days of the receipt ofan executed release. PJR shall mail a copy of any settlement check and proof of its delivery (a signed certified mail receipt to the Commission within thirty (30 days of mailing. The Commission shall notifypjr of any change of address received from a payee so that its payment records may be adjusted accordingly. In the event that any check is returned to PJR as undeliverable, PJR will notify the Commission in writing within seven (7 days of receipt of the returned check. The Commission will then attempt to locate the person. No payroll withholding shall be deducted from any amount payable to Petrov pursuant to this Decree. PJR shall issue IRS Form 1099 to Petrov to reflect payment for income tax purposes. Petrov shall be responsible for paying her own tax, if any is due. Upon entry of this Decree, the Commission will forward a Release (Appendix B to Petrov for execution. The Commission will notify counsel for PJR when it has received a copy of the executed Release and will forward the same to counsel for PJR. Then, within ten business days of receipt ofthe executed Release, P JR shall mail to Petrov a check as referenced above by certified mail at Petrov's address. 5. COMPLIANCE COORDINATOR: Within fourteen (14 days of the entry of this Decree, PJR agrees to designate an employee who has expertise in Title VII compliance and personnel matters as a Compliance Coordinator to oversee its compliance with the implementation of this Decree. The Compliance Coordinator will be responsible for: [i] coordinating PJR's compliance with Title VII; [ii] ensuring PJR's compliance with this Decree; 3

[iii] maintaining records of all written complaints of sexual harassment made by any PJR employee to a management official, including complaints relating to alleged improper conduct of vendors, customers, service providers/suppliers or other business-related contacts by PIR's employees; [iv] assisting in developing, implementing, and enhancing PJR's policies and training programs related to Title VII compliance and maintaining records of employee completion of training programs which include components related to Title VII compliance; and [v] following up on all complaints of sexual harassment made by PJR employees. The Compliance Coordinator will report to the Commission on an annual basis in accordance with the requirements found in paragraph 10, infra. 6. POLICIES AND PROCEDURES: PJR shall create and enforce employment policies that prohibit sexual harassment and discrimination in all its facilities. In this regard, PJR shall devise a policy which provides all employees with a toll-free telephone number that may be used by employees to report sexual harassment. PJR agrees train and designate individuals in management who will promptly respond to and investigate complaints of sexual harassment. PJR's President or Chief Executive Officer agrees to periodically issue a letter or other communication to all employees that reaffirms PJR's commitment to providing its employees with a workplace that is free of discrimination and harassment. PJR shall insure that all investigations relating to complaints of sexual harassment will include: (a interviews of the complainant and witnesses identified; (b concurrent notes of the investigation; and (c the issuance of corrective action, if appropriate. PJR agrees not to retain documents related to an investigation in any of the complainants' personnel files. Further, PJR agrees that all disciplinary actions taken against employees for violations ofpjr's sexual harassment policy will be retained 4

in the violator's personnel file. PJR agrees to disseminate its anti-discrimination and anti-sexual harassment policies by: [a posting the policies in a conspicuous place at each worksite where other EEO and labor notices are posted; [b effectively notifying all current employees of the policies and procedures, in part by including such policies in applicable employee handbooks or manuals; and [c making a copy of the policies available on any intranet site designed for employee/corporate communications. 7. STAFF TRAINING AND DEVELOPMENT: PJR agrees that it will, during the term of this Consent Decree, provide Title VII training for both its management and non-management employees. PJR agrees that it will ensure that managers have training sessions available on a semi-annual basis and that non-managers have training sessions available at least annually. PJR further agrees that it will include the following in any Title VII training provided to employees: [i an overview of Title VII, PJR's obligations under Title VII, and applicant and employee rights under Title VII; [ii non-discrimination in hiring and employment; [iii forms of harassment and discrimination prohibited by Title VII; [iv methods of reporting harassment and discrimination; [v P JR' s procedure for investigating complaints of harassment and discrimination; and [vi PJR's commitment to meeting the requirements of Title VII, including the non-retaliation provisions of the statute. 8. RECORD KEEPING: PJR shall retain all personnel records in accordance with 29 C.F.R. 1602.14. 9. MANAGER DISCIPLINE: PJR agrees that the failure of any manager at any of its facilities to comply with federal law or PJR's policies regarding Title VII compliance will result in appropriate disciplinary action against the employee. In any circumstance, a manager 5

found to have violated federal law or PJR policies regarding Title VII compliance shall have such violation noted permanently in his or her personnel record. 10. ANNUAL REPORT: PJR agrees to provide annual compliance reports within thirty (30 days of the first anniversary of the entry date of this Decree and annually thereafter to the Commission, by sending the same to Laurie A. Young, Regional Attorney, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Indianapolis District Office, 101 West Ohio Street, Suite 1900, Indianapolis, Indiana 46204. PJR's annual compliance report shall include: [i] a report of the activities of the Compliance Coordinator, including a summary of complaints and investigations concerning any alleged sexual harassment at any ofpjr's facilities - such summary will include the date of the complaint, an identifier for the complainant, and a brief summary ofthe substance of the complaint, the investigation, and the resolution or other action taken in response to the complaint; [ii] descriptions of any Title VII training provided to any employee; and [iii] confirmation that: (a the Notice required in paragraph 3 of this Decree was posted and the locations where it was posted and (b the policy referenced in paragraph 6 was made available to each current and new employee and posted. 11. NON-COMPLIANCE: In the event that the Commission believes that PJR has failed to comply with any provision(s of this Decree, it shall: [i] notify PJR in writing of the alleged non-compliance and shall send such notice to both the Compliance Coordinator and PJR's counsel and [ii] afford PJR forty-five (45 business days after service of such notice to remedy the non-compliance. IfPJR has not remedied the alleged non-compliance within forty-five (45 business days, the Commission may petition the Court to enforce the terms of this Decree at any time during which this Court maintains jurisdiction over this action. In the event 6

the Court finds that P JR has violated this Decree, the Court may order appropriate relief to remedy the non-compliance, including attorneys' fees, daily fines, and appropriate injunctive relief. 12. COSTS AND FEES: The parties shall bear their respective attorneys' fees and costs incurred in this action up to the date of entry of this Decree. 13. DURATION OF CONSENT DECREE: This Court shall retain jurisdiction of this action for a period ofthree (3 years after entry of this Decree. This Decree shall expire by its own terms at the end of three (3 years without further action by the parties. IT IS SO ORDERED. THIS CONSENT DECREE IS HEREBY ENTERED ON THIS ---'.1--,-2_11_ DAY OF --'.A~p:.:.,..-i-'-/--_, 2005. 7

SENT BY: FAITZSHALL LAW FIRM; 773 763 2905; MAA~22~05 10:50AM; PAGE 9/10 This Consent Decree is approved and consented to by the following authorized Louisville Area Office 600 Martin Luther King, Jr. Place, Suite 268 Louisville, K Y 40202-2285 (502 582-6308 (Dil'C(;t Dial Signature of Authorized Officer fof PIR Enterprises,Inc. d/b/a Jiffy Lube~ Date Printed Name of Authorized Officer for PIR Enterprises, Inc. d/b/a Jiffy Lube 8

EMPLOYEE NOTICE Federal law prohibits discrimination against any employee, former employee, or job applicant because of the individual's sex, race, color, religion, national origin, disability, or age (over 40. Federal law also prohibits retaliation of any kind against any person who has opposed any practice made unlawful under federal law or because an individual has flied a charge, testified, assisted, or participated in any manner in an investigation, proceeding, or hearing. P JR Enterprises, Inc. supports and will comply with federal law in all respects and will not take any actions against employees and applicants for employment because they have exercised their rights under the law. PJR Enterprises, Inc. has a policy of non-discrimination in employment, conducts training programs on federal anti-discrimination laws, and will not retaliate against an individual who flies a charge of discrimination. If you have any complaints of discrimination, you may contact the EEOC at the address or telephone number given below. An employee has the right, and is encouraged to exercise that right, to report allegations of employment discrimination in the workplace. An employee may contact the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission for the purpose offlling a charge of employment discrimination. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission 500 West Madison Street Suite 2800 Chicago, Illinois 60661 PH: 312.353.2713 TTY: 312.353.2421 Toll Free 1.800.669.4000 This notice is being posted until at least, 2008, by agreement between P JR Enterprises, Inc. and the EEOC. APPENDIX A 9

RELEASE In consideration of the payment to me by PJR Enterprises, Inc., of$6,000, and in consideration of the Consent Decree agreed to by the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission and PJR Enterprises, Inc. in Civil Action No.1 :04-CV -07736, entered by the Court on 2005, of which this Release is a part, I, Virginia Petrov, hereby fully and forever release and discharge P JR Enterprises, Inc. and its successors and assigns, including its present and former directors, officers, and agents, from any claim or obligation based on alleged discrimination arising under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. 2000e-5(t(I and (3 and Section 102 of the Civil Rights Act of 1991, 42 U.S.C. 198Ia., that was or could have been raised in Civil Action No.1 :04-CV -07736. I have read this Release and I execute it voluntarily, without coercion or threat of reprisal. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Release is signed and executed by me on this I:t- day of.th_.i.h1d. 4r'>..l;L4J'---_.,2005. 7. Subscribed and sworn to before me the undersigned, a Notary Public for -:-_;"C",," OO=c.:k..=- County, State of J: t-, this ~ day of ~, 2005. -z; Pdie Signature of Notary Public County of Residence: _--=~_O=--=(,---"t.=- My Commission Expires: 6Z<OJ--I.:.-/1--./L-"-O-<-'l_ Printed name of Notary Public OFFICIAL SEAL" s: TKEBICH...- COMMISSION EXPIRES 02/11/09