pc. CIVIL APPEAL NO. 1 OF 2002 (Original Civil Appeal No. 37 of 2001 IIala District Court before Mr. Mnengo H.M.)

Similar documents
AT DAR ES SALAAM CIVIL APPEAL NO. 145 OF 2002 MATHEW MBATA...APPLICANT VERSUS DENIS CATHELESS...RESPONDENT RULING

IN THE HIGH COURT OF TANZANIA AT DAR ES SALAAM RULING. This is an application for extension of time to apply for

IN THE HIGH COURT OF TANZANIA AT DAR ES SALAAM CIVIL APPEAL NO. 36 OF 2003 JUDGMENT

IN THE HIGH COURT OF TANZANIA (DAR ES SALAAM DISTRICT REGISTRY) AT DAR ES SALAAM

IN THE HIGH COURT OF TANZANIA AT DAR ES SALAAM RULING

IN THE HIGH COURT OF TANZANIA AT DAR ES SALAAM VICTOR SUNGURA TOKE... APPLICANT VERSUS P.S.R.C & BOARD OF INTERNAL TRADE

SELEMANI RAJABU MIZINO... APPLICANT VERSUS 1. SHABIR EBRAHIM BHAIJEE 2. FAYEZA SHABIR BHAIJEE... RESPONDENTS 3. HUZAIRA SHABIR BHAIJEE

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL

IN THE HIGH COURT OF TANZANIA AT DAR ES SALAAM

A Presentation on Practice and Procedure before CESTAT. By Vipin Jain Advocate

In this omnibus application there are two basic prayers. Extension of time to file an application for leave to appeal AND leave

IN THE HIGH COURT OF TANZANIA COMMERCIAL DIVISION AT OAR ES SALAAM MISC.COMMERCIAL CAUSE NO.70 OF 2013 VERSUS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF TANZANIA AT DAR ES SALAAM ALLAN T. MATERU APPELLANT / APPLICANT VERSUS AKIBA COMMERCIAL BANK... RESPONDENT

IN THE HIGH COURT OFT AN ZAN IA (COMMERCIAL DIVTSfON) AT DAR ES SALAAM

Citation Parties Legal Principles Discussed

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF TANZANIA AT DAR ES SALAAM CORAM: RAMADHANI, J. A. NSEKELA, J. A. AND KAJI, J. A. CIVIL APPLICATION NO.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF TANZANIA AT DAR ES SALAAM VERSUS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF TANZANIA (OAR ES SALAAM DISTRICT REGISTRY) AT OAR ES SALAAM MISC. CIVIL CAUSE NO.157 OF 2005 ELIZABETH AUGUSTINO SAID PETITIONER

IN THE HIGH COURT OF TANZANIA (DAR ES SALAAM DISTRICT REGISTRY) JUDGMENT

In the High Court of Tanzania at Mwanza the appellant and two. others were charged with murder c/s 196 of the Penal Code. It was

REGIONAL MANAGER, TANROADS KAGERA.. APPLICANT VERSUS RUAHA CONCRETE COMPANY LIMITED... RESPONDENT

Washington Omondi Oganga & another v Orange Democratic Movement & another [2017] eklr

IN THE HIGH COURT OF TANZANIA AT DAR ES SALAAM RULING

Communication 243/2001, Women's Legal Aid Center (on behalf of Sophia Moto) v Tanzania

2yh August, Supplement No THE BASIC RIGHTS AND DUTIES ENFORCEMENT (CAP.

THE SUMATRA (COMPLAINTS AND REVIEW PROCEDURE) RULES, 2008

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION. CIVIL APPEAL No(s) OF 2018 (Arising out of SLP(C)No(s) OF 2016)

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF TANZANIA AT DAR ES SALAAM. (CORAM: MROSO, J. A, MSOFFE, J. A. AND KAJI, J. A.) CIVIL REFERECE NO.

CIVIL APPEAL NO OF 2018 (Arising out of SLP(C) No of 2016) MOHD. SAHID AND OTHERS.Appellants VERSUS J U D G M E N T

STAY OF EXECUTION-whether the application has been overtakenusually,

This is an application for revision in terms of the provisions of

IN THE HIGH COURT OF TANZANIA LABOUR DIVISION AT DAR ES SALAAM REVISION NO 305 OF 2010

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF TANZANIA AT DAR ES SALAAM CIVIL REFERENCE NO.12 OF 2004 DAVID MWAKIKUNGA. APPELANT VERSUS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : SUIT FOR RECOVERY Date of decision: 17th July, 2013 RFA 383/2012. Versus

(CORAM: NSEKELA, J.A., KILEO, J.A. And BWANA, J.A.) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 26 OF 2008

THE UNITED REPUBLIC OF TANZANIA THE TAX REVENUE APPEALS ACT CHAPTER 408 REVISED EDITION 2006

THE REPUBLIC OF UGANDA IN THE HIGH COURT OF UGANDA AT KAMPALA (COMMERCIAL COURT DIVISION)

THE UNITED REPUBLIC OF TANZANIA. GOVERNMENT NOTICE NO 205 published on 22/7/2005. THE PUBLIC PROCUREMENT ACT, 2004 (ACT No.

(Application for stay of execution from the decision of the High Court of Tanzania at Dar es Salaam)

S17-65 [Issue 1] STATE CORPORATIONS APPEAL TRIBUNAL RULES, 2001 ARRANGEMENT OF RULES Rule SCHEDULES FIRST SCHEDULE

Date of last Order. Date of Ruling

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE DEMOCRATIC SOCIALIST REPUBLIC OF SRI LANKA

THE EAST AFRICAN COURT OF JUSTICE AT ARUSHA (CORAM:MARY STELLA ARACH-AMOKO,DPJ)

IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (The High Court of Assam, Nagaland, Mizoram and Arunachal Pradesh) Small Industries Development Bank of India ( SIDBI)

1 ST ADILI BANCORP LIMITED.APPELLANT VERSUS ISSA HUSSEIN SAMMA...RESPONDENT

IN THE HIGH COURT IN MALAYA AT KUALA LUMPUR (CIVIL DIVISION) ORIGINATING SUMMONS NO. 24FC /2014 BETWEEN ALLIANCE BANK MALAYSIA BERHAD AND

COURT OF APPEAL RULES, 1997 (C.I 19)

NC General Statutes - Chapter 43 Article 4 1

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION. CIVIL APPEAL No.117 OF 2019 [Arising out of SLP (C) No of 2014] Versus

DIRECTIONS FOR FILING A MOTION TO SET ASIDE A DEFAULT JUDGMENT IN DISTRICT COURT

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON May 2000 Session

AFRICAN STAR DIAMONDS (PVT) LTD versus JUDY NYAMUCHANJA and MEMORY MUNHENGA and SHERIFF OF THE HIGH COURT N.O

1. YUSUFU SAME 2. HAWA DADA APPELLANTS VERSUS

SUBSIDIARY LEGISLATION

THE TAX APPEALS TRIBUNAL ACT, 2013 ARRANGEMENT OF SECTIONS PART I PRELIMINARY

IN THE HIGH COURT OF TANZANIA (DARE S SALAAM MAIN REGISTRY) AT DAR ES SALAAM MISCELLANEOUS CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 36 OF

The appellants, through the services of the Women's Legal Aid. Centre (WLAC) lodged the present appeal to challenge the dismissal of

THE INDUSTRIAL COURT (PROCEDURE) RULES, Citation. These Rules may be cited as the Industrial Court (Procedure) Rules, 2010.

THE ADVOCATES (DISCIPLINARY AND OTHER PROCEEDINGS) RULES. (Section 14) PART I PRELIMINARY PROVISIONS (rules 1-2)

IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM & ARUNACHAL PRADESH) CRP NO.6 OF 2017

IN THE HIGH COURT OF TANZANIA AT DAR ES SALAAM VERSUS SALMA AHMAD RESPONDENT.

IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA ERNEST TAYLOR CIVIL ACTION THE CITY OF BATON ROUGE, ET AL. NO.

Salem Advocate Bar Association,... vs Union Of India on 25 October, 2002

NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, NEW DELHI. Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 788 of 2018

IN THE HIGH COURT OF TANZANIA AT OAR ESSALAAM MISC. CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 38 OF VERSUS RULING

In this application made under Rule 11 (2) (b) of the Court of. Appeal Rules, 2009, the applicant, Indian Ocean Hotels Ltd. t/a

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF TANZANIA AT DAR ES SALAAM (CORAM: SAMATTA, C.J, MUNUO,J, A, AND RUTAKANGWA, J, A.)

(CORAM: RAMADHANI, C.J., MROSO, J.A. And KAJI, J.A.) 1. JOSEPH CHUWA 2. HASHIM MOTTO.. APPELLANTS VERSUS THE REPUBLIC.RESPONDENT

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF TANZANIA AT DAR ES SALAAM

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF JUDICATURE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF GHANA ACCRA- GHANA A.D. 2016

IN THE HIGH COURT OF TANZANIA AT DAR ES SALAAM MISCELLANIOUS CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 43 OF 2017 MANSOR AND

POST SUSPENSION OF A MEMBER OF THE AMERICAN LEGION OR LEGION FAMILY

Expulsion Hearing Rules

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF TANZANIA AT OAR ES SALAAM. (CORAM: KIMARO,J.A., MASSATI,J.A., And MUGASHA,J.A.) CIVIL APPLICATION NO.

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE Assigned on Briefs January 4, 2011

Ar_JlAB K~ ~bij.bb.m

Jaffar A Kassam v Orange Democratic Movement Party & another [2017] eklr

Samuel Kalii Kiminza v Jubilee Party & Another [2017] eklr REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE POLITICAL PARTIES TRIBUNAL AT NAIROBI COMPLAINT NO 279 OF 2017

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. 1. Writ Petition (Civil) No of Judgment reserved on: August 30, 2007

TOWN OF FALMOUTH PLANNING BOARD Rules of Procedure. Table of Contents

RULING OF THE COURT. The third respondent herein, Elias K. Musiba, used to be an employee

CRP No. 369 / S/O Late Ganraram Upadhaya. S/O Late Ganraram Upadhaya

MINISTRY OF HUMAN RESOURCE DEVELOPMENT NOTIFICATION

ELIGI EDWARD MASSAWE AND THREE OTHERS (On behalf of 104 others)..applicants ATTORNEY GENERAL AND TWO OTHERS...RESPONDENTS

IN THE RETIREMENT BENEFITS APPEALS TRIBUNAL AT NAIROBI. CIVIL APPEAL No. 1 of CPF Financial Services Limited Appellants -VERSUS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. CRL M C 656/2005 and CRL M A 2217/2005. Reserved on: January 17, Date of decision: February 8, 2008

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF BANGLADESH APPELLATE DIVISION

Through Mr. Atul Nigam, Mr. Amit Tiwari, Advs. versus

JUSTICE JEFFREY K. OING PART 48 PRACTICES AND PROCEDURES

Disposed at Defended Hearing Activity A B C Tasks covered by Fixed Fee All activities up to completion of Defended Hearing (including sentencing)

CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 120 OF (From Criminal Case No. 82 of 2004, RM'S Court of Kibaha) P.W. Bampikya, RM JUDGMENT

IN THE HIGH COURT OF TANZANIA LABOUR DIVISION AT DAR ES SALAAM LABOUR DISPUTE NO 15 OF 2010

Utah Court Rules on Trial Motions Francis J. Carney

FEDERAL SUPPLEMENT, 2d SERIES

IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL

Order INQUIRY REGARDING THE UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA S SEARCH FOR RECORDS

IMPROVE JUSTICE : INQUISITORIAL OR ADVERSARY CRIMINAL PROCEEDINGS (Vilnius, Lithuania 23 April) * * * * * * * * *

CONSOLIDATION OF A BYLAW OF THE CITY OF MEDICINE HAT to establish a subdivision and development appeal board.

Georgia Petition for Change of Name

Transcription:

AT DAR ES SALAAM pc. CIVIL APPEAL NO. 1 OF 2002 (Original Civil Appeal No. 37 of 2001 IIala District Court before Mr. Mnengo H.M.) CHARLES MOSES.... APPELLANT I APPLICANT VERSUS Date of last order - 21/12/2007 Date of Ruling - 29/9/2008 Shangwa, J. RULING This is an application for setting aside the dismissal order of the Applicant's appeal which was made by Ihema, J (Rtd) on 21/3/2003. It is supported by counsel he swore on 4/3/2008 argued this application by way of written

2 In his written submissions, counsel for the Applicant Mr. Masaka stated that there was a mistake on the part of this court which ordered the Applicant in its ruling delivered on 20/2/2008 to file a fresh application for restoration of his appeal. According to Mr. Masaka, the granting of the Applicant's application dated 14/4/2005 automatically did render the appeal restored as the second prayer in the Applicant's application which was granted was for setting aside the dismissal order dated 21/3/2003, and for restoration of the Appeal to hearing on merits. With respect, I think Mr. Masaka did not properly read my ruling dated 20/2/2008. Had he done so, he would have realized that although the Applicant's application dated 14/4/2005 was requesting for two orders one for extension of time within which to apply to set aside the dismissal order dated 21/3/2003 and another one for setting aside the said order and restore the appeal to hearing on merits, I

3 deliberately avoided granting both orders at the same time because it was not practicable to do so. What I did therefore was to deal only with the application for extension of time within which to apply for setting aside the dismissal order of his appeal made by Ihema, J (Rtd) on 21/3/2003 and fix the period within which to apply for the same. In arguing this application, Mr. Masaka submitted that the grounds upon which it is based are contained in the Applicant's affidavit. He did not mention any of those grounds. A perusal of that affidavit will show that the Applicant is praying for restoration of his appeal on grounds that when it was called for hearing by Ihema, J (Rtd) on 21/3/2003 and dismissed for want of prosecution, he was not aware that this case had been fixed for hearing due to lack of notice. On the other side, Mr. Semgalawe submitted on hehalf of the Respondent that the Applicant is telling the court lies

4 by saying that he was not aware of the date of hearing his appeal. He contended that the Applicant had a duty to follow up his appeal which he did not do because of negligence. Thus, he prayed that his application should be dismissed with costs. I have gone through this court's record and found that the Applicant presented his Memorandum of Appeal for filing on 20/12/2001. Ihema, J (Rtd) was assigned to hear his appeal. On 18/2/2002, he fixed it for hearing on 17/5/2002 and made an order that the parties should be notified. No notice was issued to them. On 17/5/2002, Mutungi, Dr fixed the appeal for hearing on 23/9/2002 and ordered that the parties should be notified. On that date, the Appellant/Applicant did not appear for lack of notice. Mr. Jundu for the Respondent appeared. Ihema, J (Rtd) adjourned the hearing up to 21/3/2003 and ordered that the Appellant/Applicant should be notified. On that date, the

5 Appellant/Applicant did not appear. Mr. Semgalawe for the respondent prayed the court to dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. His prayer was granted by Ihema, (Rtd) in the following words and I quote:- 'jqs the Appellant is absent and without notice the appeal is hereby dismissed with costs for want of prosecution as prayed Order accordingly'~ After reading the above quoted order, I went through the copies of the summonsesthat were issued by this court from the date of filing the appeal to the date of dismissing it but I have not seen any summons which shows that the Appellant/Applicant was notified to appear on 21/3/2003 or any document to prove that the Appellant/Applicant was notified to appear on that date but that he neglected to do so.

For this reason, I hold that the Appellant!Applicant was not aware of the date on which his appeal was fixed for hearing. Due to the said fact, it cannot be said that he neglected to follow up his appeal or that he is telling this court lies just as it was submitted by Mr. Semgalawefor the Respondent. Therefore, for the sake of justice, I do set aside the dismissal order of the Appellant/Applicant's appeal made by Ihema, J (Rtd) on 21/3/2003 and I restore it to hearing on merit. Consequently, I order that the appeal should come for hearing on 18/11/2008. Costs in the main cause. ~~ A.Shangwa JUDGE 29/9/2008

Delivered in open court this 29 th day of September, 2008 in the presence of Mr. Msafiri for Mr. Masaka for the Appellant and in the presence of the Respondent appearing in person. ~-.J.' A. Shangwa JUDGE 29/9/2008