Case 1:16-cr FAM Document 98 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/11/2016 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

Similar documents
The Office of the United States A torney for the Southern District of Florida (hereinafter

Case 1:18-cr MGC Document 61 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/19/2018 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

Section 1B1.2(a) of the Sentencing Guidelines.

Relator Olivia Graves brings a qui tam action under the False Claim Act, 3 1 U.S.C. j 3720,

Case 1:16-cr BB Document 101 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/04/2017 Page 1 of 7

Case 9:14-cv RLR Document 92 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/25/2014 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

SOUTHEIWDISTQIGT 17 - F 0 FLORIDA or 2R-sc0u

hi U- V 1 8 2,0 5 is -! îf ' *'/ è i 7 '1 h z l '

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

Case 2:15-cr FMO Document 52 Filed 04/25/16 Page 1 of 17 Page ID #:295

Social Security Number Required: Enter on separate page provided in the application. 7 Dentist Address:

NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF AMUSEMENT RIDE SAFETY OFFICIALS CONSTITUTION ARTICLE 1 - NAME

L iechtenstein L aw G azette (L iechtensteinisches L andesgesetzblatt)

CR-COHN/SELTZER

NC General Statutes - Chapter 108D 1

AGREEMENT ON FILM CO- PRODUCTIONS BETWEEN THE GOVERNMENT OF THE REPUBLI C OF SOUTH AFRI CA AND THE GOVERNMENT OF THE I TALI AN REPUBLI C

Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services Division of Licensing

Case 0:17-cr BB Document 125 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/23/2018 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT CO URT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

The Complete Works of the National Assembly, Volume 1 ( ) - the important activities of National Assembly acccording to archives

RE: Comments on Revision of Form N-648, 75 Fed. Reg (February 1, 2010)

Case 4:18-cv XXXX Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/06/2018 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA. Case No.

Guidance Clarifying the Adjudication of Form N-648, Medical Certification for Disability Exceptions

NOV PROPOSAL TO DEBAR NOTICE OF OPPORTUNITY FOR HEARING Docket No. OON-1530

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA WESTERN DIVISION CIVIL ACTION NO: 5:12-CV-818

CITY OF HOLLYWOOD POLICE OFFICERS RETIREMENT SYSTEM FORFEITURE RULES OF PROCEDURE

CR-WILLIAMS/SIMONTON

ALABAMA STATE BOARD OF CHIROPRACTIC EXAMINERS ADMINISTRATIVE CODE CHAPTER 190-X-2 LICENSURE TABLE OF CONTENTS

Case 9:16-cr RLR Document 112 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/04/2017 Page 1 of 8 UM TED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

3.1 ARTICLE AMENDMENT

IC Chapter 9. Health Professions Standards of Practice

STATE OF FLORIDA BOARD OF CLINICAL SOCIAL WORK, MARRIAGE AND FAMILY THERAPY AND MENTAL HEALTH COUNSELING FINAL ORDER

Matter of CHRISTO'S, INC. Decided April 9,2015 s

10/14/2015. Introduction: Exclusion, Revocation, and Civil Monetary Penalties. OIG Exclusion and CMS Billing Revocation. OIG Civil Monetary Penalties

v. CRIMINAL VIOLATIONS: (i")

CR-MAR MATTHEW MAN

West Virginia Board of Optometry

Case 1:09-md JLK Document 3706 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/18/2013 Page 1 of 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

Follow this and additional works at:

UNI TED STATES DI STRI CT COURT EASTERN DI STRI CT OF MI SSOURI EASTERN DI VI SI ON

and his professionals is subjected to review. A hearing is essential because the Receiver

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT

The Hague Child Support

Case 9:16-cr RLR Document 92 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/03/2017 Page 1 of 6

S ubject L ist N o. 58

Case 1:18-cr JEM Document 3 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/26/2018 Page 1 of 15 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLOW DA CASE NO.

Woissol v Bristol-Myers Squibb Co NY Slip Op 31982(U) October 23, 2015 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: /2014 Judge: Arlene

Due Process Grievance and Appeal

Instructions for Applying to be Reinstated After 5 Years

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR COUNTY, FLORIDA. Case Number:

[ ] WARRANT [ ] ORDER OF DETENTION v. [ ] AMENDED COMPLAINT

Case 1:12-cr DMM Document 119 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/10/2012 Page 1 of 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA JACKSONVILLE DIVISION

EMPLOYMENT APPLICATION

0 82UTHtrisguS OF FL~RIDA

PursuanttotheCourt'sOrderon M otionsforsummary Judgment(DE-4981entered on April30,2015,andtheCourt'sOrderre:ContentsofInjunction,itis

Case 1:13-cr DLG Document 12 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/25/2013 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

Baltic Air Charter Association Rules of Membership

Case 2:18-cr RGK Document 24 Filed 07/23/18 Page 1 of 29 Page ID #:80

COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS. SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT Jury Trial Demanded

2. "Artificially administered" means providing food or fluid through a medically invasive procedure.

UBS Financial Services Inc. v. Bounty Gain Enterprises, Inc. Doc. 178 UN ITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

Case 8:09-cr CJC Document 54 Filed 05/18/12 Page 1 of 17 Page ID #:143

DEPARTMENTAL APPEALS BOARD

Case 2:10-cr SRB Document 303 Filed 03/21/12 Page 1 of 11

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI WESTERN DIVISION PLEA AGREEMENT

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC DISTRICT COURT CASE NO. 4D

violate the Anti-kickback Statute, Title 42, United States Code, Section 1320a-7b(b), w lich makes

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY AT BOWLING GREEN NO. 21 U.S.C. 846

Origin. What Every Notary Should Know. Richard Alexander Gwinnett County Clerk of Superior Court. L aw re n c e v ille, G A Ju n e 2 0,

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI WESTERN DIVISION

PUnited Nations Development Programme

THOROUGHBRED RACING AUTHORIZED AGENT LICENSE FORM

Case 6:15-cr WSS Document 4 (Court only) Filed 01/08/15 Page 1 of 6

CITIZENSHIP. What We Will Cover Today

Health Care Fraud and Abuse Laws Affecting Medicare and Medicaid: An Overview

- 79th Session (2017) Assembly Bill No. 474 Committee on Health and Human Services

STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH ADMINISTRATIVE COMPLAINT. Petitioner Department of Health files this Administrative Complaint

Case 1:09-md JLK Document 4062 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/03/2015 Page 1 of 7

Instructions. III. Documentary Requirements. I. Purpose of This Form. II. Eligibility Requirements. A. Medical Examination. B. Photographs.

David Burkland City Manager. Lori J. Barker City Attorney. John Rucker Assistant City Manager. Ruben Martinez General Services Director

Special Issues in Employment Law: Comprehensive Immigration Reform and Criminal Background Checks

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT. No versus. No D. C. Docket No. 1:10-cr JEM-2.

(131st General Assembly) (Substitute Senate Bill Number 127) AN ACT

The Path to Citizenship

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT. No Non-Argument Calendar. D.C. Docket No. 1:13-cv DLG.

THOROUGHBRED RACING EXERCISE RIDER / PONY LICENSE FORM

Last Name First Name Middle Name. At: (City/Providence/State/Country) 4. Signature: Date:

PROPOSED REGULATION OF THE STATE BOARD OF HEALTH. LCB File No. R September 29, 2010

GEORGIA PEACE OFFICER STANDARDS AND TRAINING COUNCIL PETITION FOR MODIFICATION OF PROBATION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA JACKSONVILLE DIVISION UNITED STATES PROPOSED VOIR DIRE EXAMINATION QUESTIONS

HARNESS RACING OWNER / TRAINER / DRIVER LICENSE FORM

CITY of ALBUQUERQUE SEVENTEENTH COUNCIL

Legal Issues in Coding

(Please print legibly) SECTION A PERSONAL INFORMATION SECTION B - CRIMINAL CONVICTIONS. NO Skip Section B

Discovery Tactics: Use and Abuse of Rule 30(b)(6) Corporate Witness Depositions David King Bass Berry & Sims (Nashville, TN)

Case 4:14-cr JPG Document 1 Filed 03/19/14 Page 1 of 15 Page ID #1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

United States District Court

2:13-mj DUTY Doc # 16 Filed 08/13/13 Pg 1 of 13 Pg ID 256 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

Transcription:

Case 1:16-cr-20010-FAM Document 98 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/11/2016 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA VS. FERNANDO M ENDEZ VILLAM IL, a/k/a ufernando M endez,'' Defendant. / UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. 16-20010-CR-MORENO The United States hereby files this factual basis in support of the change of plea of defendant FERNA ND O M END EZ V ILLA M IL. In support thereof, the governm ent asserts the follow ing facts: Beginning on or about 2002, and continuing through on or about January 2016, the defendant, FERNANDO MENDEZ VILLAMIL, along with defendants Maritza Exposito, Arnaldo O Jimenez, and Yomara Vila and others known and unknown to the government conspired to commit fraudulent schemes including (1) falsely biling M edkare and M edicaid for patient encounters that did not occur and were not medicaly necessary; (2) providing false diagnosis of psychiatric im pairments that were used to fraudulently obtain Social Security disability benefits; (3) falsely certifying diagnosis of psychiatric impairments on USCIS Form N- 648 so that persons applying for naturalization were fraudulently exem pted from the exam ination required to satisfy the testing requirement in civics and Ianguage; and (4) prescribing M edicaid and M edicare beneficiaries m edicines that w ere not medically necessary.

Case 1:16-cr-20010-FAM Document 98 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/11/2016 Page 2 of 6 Defendant M endez V illam il was a Florida Iicensed physician w ith a psychiatric practice in Miami, Florida. During 2002 through 201 0, defendant Mendez Villamil was a Medicaid provider authorized to submit claims to FloridaMedicaid and during 2002 through 20l 3, defendant Mendez Villamil was a Medicare provider authorized to submit claims to Medicare. W hile the governm ent does not believe that every patient seen by the defendant and every patient record produced by the defendant involved a fraudulent claim, the governm ent w ould have proven that the defendant committed the various types of fraud mentioned above in the manner summarized below. Beginning 2002 and continuing through January 20 l6, individuals who wert seeking to obtain Social Security disability benefits paid approximately $1,500 in cash payments in exchange for a false mental diagnosis from defendant Mendez Villamil in support of their disability application. Defendant M endez V illam il. in som e instances, back dated patients' records to intentionaly mislead the Social Security Administration (SSA) into believing the individual had a Iong term m ental health treatm ent history that did not in fact exist. Defendant M endez Vilam il provided sam ple patient progress notes to defendant Exposito and other co-conspirators and instructed them how to clone and falsify patient records. These false and fraudulent m edical records were then faxed to the SSA to support the disability application of those individuals that paid cash to defendant M endez V illam il. The SSA. relying on the authenticity of the diagnosis and clinical records subm itted by defendant M endez Villam il, paid disability benefits in excess of $20,302,923 to individuals and their dependents that were not qualified or eligible to receive such benefits. Exam ples of this fraudulent schem e w ere audio and video recorded on April 22, 201 5 and April 30, 20l 5. by a Confidential Source (CS) who was gainfuly employed at the time and not 2

Case 1:16-cr-20010-FAM Document 98 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/11/2016 Page 3 of 6 suffer from any mental ilness. He paid the required $1,500 in cash and obtained a disabling m ental diagnosis from defendant M endez Villam il. During the April 30, 20l 5 m eeting betw een the CS and defendant Mendez Vilamil, defendant Mendez Vilamil told the CS that, 'çwe wil begin in January of last year, 2014'9 (meaning the medical records would be back dated one year). After discussing with the CS how he should work ioff the books' to justify his disability claim, defendant MENDEZ-VILLAMIL then talked to the CS about the process to obtain disability benefits (e.g., how Iong it takes, denial, and appeal). Defendant M ENDEZ-VILLAM IL told the CS he would put down a severe diagnosis, because the C S young. Defendant M EN DEZ-VILLAM IL then described bi-polar disorder to the CS. D efendant M EN D EZ-V ILLA M IL then told the CS that he was giving him a prescription for m edication that he could pick up cheaply, but cautioned the CS not to take it. Defendant M EN DEZ-V ILLA M IL stated the CS did not have to see him every month but that he, MENDEZ-VILLAMIL, would document the f5le m onthly as if he had done so. Defendant M EN DEZ-VILLAM IL said that if the CS did not have time to see him, the CS should come in for his appointment and ask SsMaritza' (meaning EXPOSITO) for the prescription and M ENDEZ-VILLAM IL would send it out to him (in the reception room). Defendant M ENDEZ-VILLAM IL emphasized that it was important that the CS til the prescriptions. In O ctober 201 5, the SSA faxed a request for information regarding the CS's diagnosis and treatment to defendant MENDEZ-VILLAMIL'S omce, as is routinely done when a disability applicant cites a treating physician. O n N ovem ber I 8, 2015, defendant M EN DEZ-V ILLAM IL'S office forw arded, via w ire, to the SSA 35 pages of m edical records and completed a United States Citizenship and Imm igration Services (USCIS) form that included an Initial Psychiatric Evaluation dated January 23, 2014, and m onthly Progress N otes for the tim e period February 2014 3

Case 1:16-cr-20010-FAM Document 98 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/11/2016 Page 4 of 6 through N ovem ber 13, 2015. The Evaluation and Progress N otes have what appears to be the signature of defendant MENDEZ-VILLAMIL. The CS was shown what purports to be his signature in the initial psychiatric evaluation and he stated it is not his signature. Defendant MENDEZ-VILLAMIL purports, on the form signed on November l4, 2015, that the CS suffers from ûlauditory hallucinations,' is iidisheveled,' and diagnosed as itbipolar,'' dldepressed with Psychosis' w ith a iipoor'' prognosis. In addition to the fraudulent scheme documented in the recording mentioned above, several witnesses will testify that beginning as early as 2002 and continuing through 20l 6, defendant M endez Villam il w ould create fraudulent m edication m anagem ent records docum enting patient visits that never occu red. In som e instances individuals would com e in to his office, sign in for approxim ately 5 or 6 individuals that were not actually present, m eet w ith M endez V illam il and obtain prescriptions for those individuals w ho w ere not present. In other instances, individuals w ould sim ply w alk up to the reception desk and pick up a prescription for psychotropic m edications. Defendants M endez V illam il, Exposito, Vila, and other co-conspirators would then create progress notes docum enting patient visits that never took place on the dates prescriptions were dispensed. Defendant M endez Villam il would then use those false m edical records to support his billing to M edicare and M edicaid. lnterview s of individuals that w ere receiving these prescriptions and filling them revealed that they never needed the medications and were not using them, as instructed. As a result, approximately $25,905,372 in false claims were submitted to the Florida Medicaid program of which approximately $16,71 1,447 were paid for oflce visits that never occurred and for medications that were neither needed nor taken. In addition, approximately $ 1 5,787,675 in false claim s was subm ited to the M edicare Part B and D program of which approximately $1 2,868,071 was paid 4

Case 1:16-cr-20010-FAM Document 98 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/11/2016 Page 5 of 6 for office visits that never occu red and m edications that were neither needed nor taken. Beginning 201 l and continuing through January 2016, in exchange for cash paym ents, M EN DEZ-VILLAM IL and his co-conspirators provided fraudulently certified USCIS Forms N-648, M edical Certification for D isability Exceptions, to resident aliens who w ere applying for naturalization. USCIS form N-648 is intended for an applicant w ho seeks an exception to the English and/or civics requirem ents for naturalization due to a physical or developm ental disability or mental im pairm ent that has Iasted, or is expected to last, 12 m onths or m ore. Patient recruiters would come in to defendant Mendez Vilamil's office, meet with him and provide him the biographical inform ation of resident aliens w ho were seeking to obtain disability certifications for USCIS. Defendant M endez Vilam il w ould instruct his co-conspirators to create patient records supporting a false m ental disability diagnosis and Forms N-648. These false Form s N-648 were then created by defendant Exposito and other co-conspirators and given to patient recruiters and individuals w ho then subm itted them to USCIS, in order to obtain a waiver from the English and/or civic requirements of the U.S. naturalization process, as well as any fess that w ere associated w ith that process. A s a result of these false and fraudulent form N-648s, U SCIS waived imm igration fees in excess of $8 14,640 to scores of individuals who were otherwise not entitled to receive such w aivers. Furtherm ore, in or around 2004, at the request of defendant M EN D EZ-V ILLAM IL and Individual 3, defendants JIM EN EZ and EXPOSITO introduced Individual 2 (as mentioned in the Indictment) to defendant M ENDEZ-VILLAM IL as a person interested in marying lndividual 3 for the purpose of evading a provision of the immigration laws of the United States. ln return for participating in the false marriage with Individual 3, defendant M EN D EZ-V ILLAM IL offered to assist Individual 2 to fraudulently obtain SSA disability benefits and cash payment. Defendant 5

Case 1:16-cr-20010-FAM Document 98 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/11/2016 Page 6 of 6 # EXPO SITO assisted defendant M EN DEZ-V ILLA M IL in the preparation of fraudulent Progress Notes for lndividual 2 and provided unnecessary prescriptions for Xanax to lndividual 2. These events occurred in M iam idade County, in the Southern D istrict of Florida and elsew here. The above-described facts sel've only as a sum m ary of the testim ony w ere this case to proceed to trial and are not intended to be an exhaustive account of ali the inform ation available to the Governm ent concerning the offenses charged in the Indictm ent. If this case were to go to trial the G overnm ent would be in a position to prove ali of the above bç nd a reasonable doubt.,.' ZW g,' z / Date: (late: Date:.o!lo /zn ay,,-, ' x,w /, # wllo (late:5 /z, / <' By : By: Hager nes K. Sim mons Specia ssistant U.S. Attorney Phillip L. Reizenstein Ato ey ry6 for Pefendant azy Jorge L. ' Attorney for Defendant #e VlDV51 y: -, ->, FERNAN M ENDEZ VILLAM IL Defendant 6