WHAT HAS CHANGED for TRADEMARKS with THE NEW TURKISH IP CODE?

Similar documents
THE ACTS ON AMENDMENTS TO THE PATENT ACT */**/***/****/*****/******/*******

CZECH REPUBLIC Utility Model Act

LATVIA Patent Law adopted on 15 February 2007, with the changes of December 15, 2011

FINLAND Patents Act No. 550 of December 15, 1967 as last amended by Act No. 101/2013 of January 31, 2013 Enter into force on 1 September 2013

PATENT ACT (UNOFFICIAL CLEAR TEXT) I. GENERAL PROVISIONS

THE PATENT LAW 1. GENERAL PROVISIONS. Article 1. This Law shall regulate the legal protection of inventions by means of patents.

ROMANIA Patent Law NO.64/1991 OFFICIAL GAZETTE OF ROMANIA, PART I, NO.613/19 AUGUST 2014

SWEDEN PATENTS ACT No.837 of 1967 in the version in force from July 1, 2014

OFFICIAL GAZETTE OF ROMANIA, PART I, NO.613/19 AUGUST 2014 REPUBLICATION PATENT LAW NO.64/1991 1

The Consolidate Patents Act

AUSTRIA Utility Model Law

Utility Model Law I. GENERAL PROVISIONS

Regulations to the Norwegian Patents Act (The Patent Regulations)

HUNGARY Patent Act Act XXXIII of 1995 as consolidated on March 01, 2015

FINLAND Patents Decree No. 669 of September 26, 1980 as last amended by Decree No. 580 of 18 July 2013 Enter into force on 1 September 2013

The Consolidate Utility Models Act 1)

Act No. 435/2001 Coll. on Patents, Supplementary Protection Certificates and on Amendment of Some Acts as Amended (The Patent Act)

OFFICIAL GAZETTE OF THE REPUBLIC OF KOSOVA / No. 12 / 29 AVGUST 2011, PRISTINA. LAW No. 04/L-029 ON PATENTS LAW ON PATENTS

Order on Patents and Supplementary Protection Certificates

PART I IMPLEMENTING REGULATIONS TO PART I OF THE CONVENTION

DENMARK Patents Regulations Order No. 25 of 18 January, 2013 ENTRY INTO FORCE: 1 February, 2013

New IP Code changes regarding patents, new post-grant opposition and enforcement provisions

of Laws for Electronic Access SLOVAKIA Law on Inventions, Industrial Designs and Rationalization Proposals (No. 527 of November 27, 1990)*

PATENT LAW OF GEORGIA CHAPTER I. GENERAL PROVISIONS

LAWS OF THE REPUBLIC OF UZBEKISTAN in Sphere of Intellectual Property Rights Protection

DECISION 486 Common Intellectual Property Regime (Non official translation)

Patent Law of the Republic of Kazakhstan

LAW ON THE PROTECTION OF INVENTIONS. No. 50-XVI of March 7, Monitorul Oficial nr /455 din * * * TABLE OF CONTENTS.

PART TWO APPLICATION, EXAMINATION, REGISTRATION AND RENEWAL

SECTION I. GENERAL PROVISIONS

Courtesy translation provided by WIPO, 2012

DRAFT PATENT LAW OF GEORGIA CHAPTER I. GENERAL PROVISIONS

LUXEMBOURG Patent Law as amended by the law of May 24, 1998 ENTRY INTO FORCE: June 21, 1998

1. Inventions that are new, that involve an inventive step and that are susceptible of industrial application shall be patentable.

TURKEY Trademark Regulations as last amended on October 2, 2002

RUSSIA Patent Law #3517-I of September 23, 1992, as amended by the federal law 22-FZ of February 7, 2003 ENTRY INTO FORCE: March 11, 2003

TREATY SERIES 2008 Nº 4. Act revising the Convention on the Grant of European Patents

AUSTRALIA Patents Act 1990 Compilation date: 24 February 2017 Includes amendments up to: Act No. 61, 2016 Registered: 27 February 2017

Law on Trademarks and Indications of Geographical Origin

Chapter 16 of the above-mentioned Agreement establishes provisions relating to the need to respect and safeguard intellectual property rights;

THE PATENT LAW 1 I INTRODUCTORY PROVISIONS. 1. Subject Matter of Regulation and Definitions. Subject Matter of Regulation.

TURKEY Industrial Design Law Decree-law No. 554 as amended by Law No of November 7, 1995 ENTRY INTO FORCE: November 7, 1995

of 25 June 1954 (Status as of 1 January 2017) para. 2) is not patentable as an invention. 7

LAW OF THE REPUBLIC OF TAJIKISTAN ON TRADEMARKS AND SERVICE MARKS

ETHIOPIA A PROCLAMATION CONCERNING INVENTIONS, MINOR INVENTIONS AND INDUSTRIAL DESIGNS PROCLAMATION NO. 123/1995 ENTRY INTO FORCE: May 10, 1995

L 172/4 EN Official Journal of the European Union

Kazakhstan Patent Law Amended on July 10, 2012

IMPLEMENTING REGULATIONS TO THE LAW 84/1998 ON TRADEMARKS AND GEOGRAPHICAL INDICATIONS. CHAPTER I General Provisions

THE INDUSTRIAL PROPERTY BILL (No... of 2016) Explanatory Memorandum

Rksassociate Advocates & Legal Consultants ebook

EGYPTIAN PATENT OFFICE

Compilation date: 24 February Includes amendments up to: Act No. 61, Registered: 27 February 2017

SWITZERLAND Patent Law as last amended on March 20, 2009 ENTRY INTO FORCE: January 1, 2012

Implementing Regulations to the Convention on the Grant of European Patents

Utility Models Act. Passed RT I 1994, 25, 407 Entry into force

Prosecuting an Israel Patent Application and Beyond

HUNGARY Utility Model Act Act XXXVIII OF 1991 on the protection of utility models as consolidated on April 1, 2013

Law on the protection of inventions No. 50/2008 of the Republic of Moldova can be found at:

AZERBAIJAN Law on Patent Date of Text (Enacted): July 25, 1997 ENTRY INTO FORCE: August 2, 1997

ACT AMENDING AND SUPPLEMENTING THE DESIGNATIONS OF ORIGIN OF PRODUCTS AND SERVICES ACT*/**/***

Article 4. Signs, registered as trademarks The following signs may be registered as trademarks:

Pursuant to the November 29, 2005 Law on Intellectual Property;

OFFICIAL S U P P L E M E N T. Monday, August 20, 2007 I Series Number 31 SUMMARY COUNCIL OF MINISTERS

CAMBODIA Trademark Law The Law Concerning Marks, Trade Names and Acts of Unfair Competition as amended on February 07, 2002

Regulations for the Implementation of Trademark Law

United Kingdom. By Penny Gilbert, Kit Carter and Stuart Knight, Powell Gilbert LLP

This document is meant purely as a documentation tool and the institutions do not assume any liability for its contents

Reproduced from Statutes of the Republic of Korea Copyright C 1997 by the Korea Legislation Research Institute, Seoul, Korea PATENT ACT

FINLAND Utility Model Decree No of December 5, 1991 As amended by Decree No. 581 of July 18, Enter into force on September 1, 2013.

Law on Inventive Activity*

Law on Trademarks and Geographical Indications

Provisional English Version. September, 2011 Revised in March, 2015 Japan Patent Office

SECTION I THE TRADEMARK AND SERVICE MARK. Chapter 1. The Legal Protection of the Trademark and Service Mark

Kingdom of Bhutan The Industrial Property Act enacted on July 13, 2001 entry into force: 2001 (Part III, Sections 17 to 23: May 1, 2009)

PATENT ACT, B.E (1979) 1. BHUMIBOL ADULYADEJ, REX; Given on the 11 th Day of March B.E. 2522; Being the 34 th Year of the Present Reign

Act No. 2 of the Year A.D relating to Patents, Utility Models, Integrated Circuit Layouts and Undisclosed Information

Section 1: General. This question does not imply that the topic of exclusions from patentability is dealt with in this question exhaustively.

Patent Act, B.E (1979) As Amended until Patent Act (No.3), B.E (1999) Translation

Questionnaire on Exceptions and Limitations to Patent Rights. The answers to this questionnaire have been provided on behalf of:

The Patents Act 1977 (as amended)

Law On Trade Marks and Indications of Geographical Origin

FINAL PROPOSAL OF THE ACT ON AMENDMENTS TO THE PATENT ACT

SUDAN Patents Act Act No. 58 of 1971 ENTRY INTO FORCE: October 15, 1971

Chapter Four Transfer and Loss of the Rights Associated with the Mark Article 26 Article 27 Article 28

LAW OF THE REPUBLIC OF TAJIKISTAN «ON GEOGRAPHICAL INDICATIONS»

TITLE II CONCEPT OF A TRADEMARK AND REGISTRATION PROHIBITIONS

REGISTERED DESIGNS ACT /221

[English translation by WIPO] Questionnaire on Exceptions and Limitations to Patent Rights

INDUSTRIAL PROPERTY ACT, No. 8 of 2010 ARRANGEMENT OF SECTIONS. PART II Patents

HONG KONG Patents (General) Rules as amended by L.N. 40 of 2004 ENTRY INTO FORCE: May 7, 2004 Chapter: 514C

PATENT. 1. Procedures for Granting a Patent

Ordinance on the Protection of Plant Varieties

Standing Committee on Patents. Questionnaire on the Publication of Patent Applications India Section

Venezuela. Contributing firm De Sola Pate & Brown

MEXICO Industrial Property Regulations Latest amendment published in the Official Federal Gazette June 10, 2011 ENTRY INTO FORCE: June 11, 2011

ON TRADEMARKS LAW ON TRADEMARKS CHAPTER I GENERAL PROVISIONS

NORWAY Designs Regulations Royal Decree of April 4, 2003 Last amendment: July 1, 2010 Updated: February 23, 2011

GERMAN UTILITY MODEL THE UNDERRATED INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHT DATE: WEDNESDAY 12 NOVEMBER 2014 LOCATION: GLASGOW, UK

Reproduced from Statutes of the Republic of Korea Copyright C 1997 by the Korea Legislation Research Institute, Seoul, Korea TRADEMARK ACT

Official Journal of the European Union L 251/3

Transcription:

1

WHAT HAS CHANGED for TRADEMARKS with THE NEW TURKISH IP CODE? VALIDITY TERM National and international trademark and design applications as well as geographical indication applications made to the Turkish Patent and Trademark Office (hereinafter referred as the Office) before the date of publication of the new IP Code No. 6769 (January 10, 2017) will be subject to legislation in force at the date of application. Therefore, there will be two different rules and practices for the applications made before, on or after January 10, 2017. POA REQUIREMENT If the application is made with an attorney, the identity and communication information of the attorney is sufficient, power of attorney is no longer required. - Identity and contact information of the consentor along with his/her application and/or registration numbers of earlier trademarks subject to LoC. - List of goods and/or services with their class numbers which are aallowed to be applied by the consentee. A two-month period is granted for correction of deficiencies related to the LoC. The LoC cannot be withdrawn after it is submitted to the Office. Separate LoCs should be submitted for each new trademark application. PUBLICATION TERM The three-month opposition period has been reduced to 2 months. LETTER OF CONSENT Submission of letter of consent (LoC) is acceptable. The LoC can be submitted either at the time of application or until the final decision is given for opposition/appeal against decision. The LoC must be notarized and apostilled and should be submitted with its sworn Turkish translation. The below points should clearly be indicated in the LoC: - Identity and contact information of the consentee along with the application number of the trademark subject to the LoC. RENEWAL Trademarks may be renewed for some of the goods and services covered by the registration. If this request is made by a representative/ attorney, a notarized and apostilled PoA including partial renewal authorization is required with its sworn Turkish translation. 2 3

EVIDENCE OF USE If a trademark is opposed by a third party, the owner of the opposed trademark has the right to ask the opponent to prove the use of his/ her trademarks which are claimed to be the legal grounds of the opposition. The applicant must clearly notify the Office for this request in written form within the one-month time period for submission of his/her counterview. Upon request from the applicant, the Office shall give a period of one month, which can be extended for one further month, to the opponent to submit evidence that shows serious use in Turkey or justifiable reasons for not using the trademark within 5 years from the date of application or priority date of the opposed application. In case the opponent does not submit any evidences of use in due time or the submitted evidence is not relevant, the Office will reject the opposition provided that the grounds for opposition is not valid. If the opponent provides evidence of use, the Office shall send this evidence to the applicant. Thereinafter, the applicant has the right to submit opinion on this evidence within a one-month period from the date of receipt. After the applicant files the opinion, a one- month period will be given to the opponent to submit his/her counterviews. In case the applicant does not submit any opinions in due time, the Office will evaluate the opposition within the scope of the existing evidences. On the other hand, if the opponent submits evidences of use before the applicant requests, the Office will take this directly into consideration in its evaluation of the opposition. However, if the applicant withdraws his/her request for the evidence of use, the request will be considered null. Additionally, during the examination, if the examiner decides that there is no possibility of confusion between the trademarks, the decision can be given without the evaluation of proof of use. After the deadline granted by the Office, no further evidences can be submitted. In the event that the evidence is not in Turkish, the Office may give a two-month period for the submission of sworn Turkish translations. If the translations are not submitted within the deadline, the evidences requiring translation shall not be taken into consideration. ARBITRATION The Office, if necessary, may invite the parties for arbitration during the examination of oppositions against a trademark publication or appeal against the decisions. In such cases, parties shall submit their declarations on arbitration in written format within one month from the date of the notification received from the Office. If one of the parties does not respond positively to the arbitration proposal, the invitation for arbitration shall be deemed rejected and the Office shall resume the examination of the appeal/opposition. In case the parties want to negotiate and notify the Office together with their requests for arbitration, the examination of the appeal/ opposition shall be postponed for not more than 3 months and this period may be extended up to a maximum of 3 months further. If the arbitration process ends due to one of the causes as indicated in the Code on Mediation in Legal Disputes No. 6325, the written arbitration report which details the arbitration conditions and explains the arbitration process between the parties shall be delivered to the Office within 1 month from the end of the arbitration activity. In case the written arbitration report is not given, the Office shall resume the examination of the appeal/opposition. The application proceedings shall be continued in accordance with the arbitration result after the written arbitration report is finalized and obtains verdict qualification in accordance with the Code No. 6325 and is delivered to the Office. Providing that the written arbitration report is not given or parties fail to reach an agreement, the Office shall resume the examination of the appeal/opposition. The lapse of time would cease during the arbitration process. 4 5

TRADEMARK APPLICATION PROCESS in line with NEW TURKISH IP CODE EX-OFFICIO EXAMINATION (1-6 MONTHS) The following processes are valid for applications made on or after January 10 th, 2017 when the new IP Code No. 6769 was officially adopted. For applications made before this date, the former Decrees will remain in force. A logo in JPEG format, a list of goods & services, information on the owner, priority information (date, number, country of origin), a priority document with its sworn translation in Turkish (can be filed later), information and document of letter of consent (LoC) if any (which should be notarized and apostilled with its sworn translation in Turkish) are required to be submitted during the application. If a priority will be claimed, the details of the priority should be stated in the application form in due course of filing. The original priority document can be submitted to the Turkish Patent Institute with its sworn translation within 3 months from the application date. Examination may take several months. The application can be refused due to the existence of prior similar trademark(s) as well as other absolute grounds of refusal as cited in Article 5 of the IP Code No. 6769. When the Turkish Patent and Trademark Office (the Office) exofficio examines and then partially or totally refuses the trademark application based on absolute grounds, the applicant has a right to appeal this refusal decision within 2 months from the notification date. The appeal is examined by the Re-Examination and Evaluation Board (REEB), and its decision is final before the Office. If the trademark is refused due to the existence of a prior similar trademark(s), the applicant has the right to obtain a notarized and apostilled LoC from the owner(s) of the prior trademark(s). In case the LoC is obtained and filed until the decision on the appeal is given, then the reason for the refusal will be deemed to be invalid, and the trademark will proceed to publication. If the decision is against the applicant, then 2 months will be given as of the notification date to initiate a court action for the cancellation of this decision before the Civil Court of Intellectual and Industrial Rights. 6 7

Possible Court Action: The main focus of court action would be the legal evaluation of the Office s decision. Therefore, regardless of the registration status of the contested trademark, the proceedings carry on. Also, the court evaluates the case by considering the evidence/ information/documentation submitted during the appeal process. Evidence which is not presented during the appeal phase is very unlikely to affect the court s judgement. PUBLICATION / OPPOSITION (2 MONTHS) & APPEAL (2 MONTHS) After the ex-officio examination of the application by the Office, opposition can be filed within 2 months following the date of publication of the application in the Official Trademark Bulletin. The applicant has a right to file a counterstatement within one month following the date of opposition notification. During this one-month-period, the applicant may request the opponent to prove use of the trademark(s) for the goods and services used as a grounds to opposition on the condition that those trademarks were registered for more than five years starting from the application/priority date. If the opponent can prove the use, then the opposition will be accepted. If the opponent cannot prove the use, then the opposition will be rejected for those goods/services. However, for 7 years starting from January 10, 2017, the Office will not have the authority to cancel the Trademark(s) due to non-use. For the non-use cancellation action, the claimant is required to start a court action. Starting from January 10, 2024, the Office will be authorized to oversee cancellation claims due to non-use. After the opponent files the proofs of use, the Office sends these documents to the applicant. Upon receipt, the applicant has a right to file comments regarding these proofs within 1 month. The opponent may submit the proof of use before the applicant demands it. In that case, the Office examines these proofs ex-officio. The Office may encourage parties to reconcile within the framework of Arbitration Law on Legal Disputes. If the opposition is refused by the Office, the adverse party has a right to file an appeal against the decision within 2 months following the notification of this decision. If the opposition is totally or partially accepted by the Office, then the applicant and/or the adverse party [depending on the situation] may file an appeal within 2 months from the date of notification against the Office s decision. The applicant and/or the adverse party has the right to file a counterstatement against this appeal within 1 month from the date of notification. Possible appeals and/or counterstatements of both parties are examined by the REEB, and its decision is final before the Office. In light of this decision, the applicant or the adverse party has the right to initiate a court action for the cancellation of this decision within two months from the notification date before the Civil Court of Intellectual and Industrial Rights. 8 9

Possible Court Action: Similar to the cases against the Office s ex-officio decisions, the main focus of the court actions against the REEB decisions would be the legal evaluation of the Office s decision. Therefore, regardless of the registration status of the contested trademark, the proceedings carry on. Different from the cases against ex-officio decisions, the opposing party must direct the case against the applicant (and vice versa). As stated, the court evaluates the case by considering the evidence/ information/documentation submitted during the opposition process. Evidence which is not presented during the opposition phase is very unlikely to affect the court s judgement. POST-REGISTRATION PROCESSES and GENERAL SUGGESTIONS Article 25(7) of the new legislation brings the non-use defense which can be directed against the plaintiff by the defendant. According to this article, if a trademark owner (the plaintiff) files an invalidation action against another trademark owner (the defendant); the defendant may claim that the plaintiff s trademark(s) which constitute legal ground for the action is/are not being used if plaintiff s trademark(s) is/are registered for more than five years starting from the application/ priority date. In case of the plaintiff s failure to prove the trademarks use for the classes, the court may reject the plaintiff s claims for the goods/services in which the use was failed to be proven. In order to avoid any problems concerning the use (or lack of use) of their trademarks, we suggest that our clients file new trademark applications and limit their applications to the goods & services which are actually used. REGISTRATION (2-6 MONTHS) The registration fee should be paid within 2 months from the date of the Office s notification. Thereinafter, the registration certificate should be received within a two-week or two-month period. The registration can be renewed every 10 years starting from the application date. There is also the option for late renewal with a penalty fee 6 months later the expiration date. 10 11

WHAT HAS CHANGED for DESIGNS with THE NEW TURKISH IP CODE? VALIDITY TERM National and international trademark and design applications as well as geographical indication applications made to the Turkish Patent and Trademark Office (hereinafter referred as the Office) before the date of publication of the new IP Code No. 6769 (January 10, 2017) will be subject to legislation in force at the date of application. Therefore, there will be two different rules and practices for applications made before, on or after January 10, 2017. NOVELTY The Office ex-officio rejects design applications which lack novelty. DESCRIPTION It is no longer obligatory to submit the description with an application, yet it can still be submitted at will. POA REQUIREMENT If the application is made with an attorney, the identity and communication information of the attorney is sufficient, power of attorney is no longer required. REGISTERED & UNREGISTERED DESIGN If the design is registered in accordance with the provisions of this Law, it will be protected as a registered design. If the design is made available to the public for the first time in Turkey, it is protected as an unregistered design. The protection period for unregistered designs is 3 years from the date on which the design is first made available to the public. RELATION WITH DESIGNER Information on how the right to request registration is obtained from the designer(s) should be given at the application stage. The designer(s) has a right to request to be listed as the designer if his/ her name is not indicated in the application. On the other hand, the designer may also request his/her name to be kept confidential. TRADEMARK INDICATED IN DESIGN Visual expression which includes the trademark element does not provide the right of trademark to the design owner. 12 13

MULTIPLE DESIGN In order for designs or products to be subject to a multiple design application, they must be applied to the same classes, except for decorative and pattern designs. DESIGN APPLICATION PROCESS in line with NEW TURKISH IP CODE APPEAL AGAINST OFFICE DECISION If a design application is refused during ex-officio examination as per Article 64, the applicant has the right to appeal this decision within 2 months from the date of notice of the Office. OPPOSITION AGAINST PUBLICATION of REGISTRATION DECISION Third parties may oppose the issuance of registration certificate of a design in 3 months from the publication date of registration decision of the design. If the information and documents supporting the opposition are not in Turkish, sworn translated versions must be submitted to the Office. The Office, if deemed necessary, may request a counterview from the applicant during the examination stage of the appeal. The applicant has a right to submit a counterview within 1 month from the notification date. The following processes are valid for applications made on or after January 10 th, 2017 when the new IP Code No. 6769 was officially adopted. For applications made before this date, the former Decrees will remain in force. Reproductions in JPEG format (min. 8x8, max. 16x16), information on the owner, priority information (date, number, country of origin), a priority document with its sworn translation in Turkish (can be filed later), a description (optional), name(s) of designer(s), confidentiality demand for the designer(s) name(s) (optional) and deferment demand (optional / up to 30 months) will be required when submitting the design application. If a priority will be claimed, the details of the priority should be stated in the application form in due course of filing. Then the original priority document can be submitted to Turkish Patent Institute with its sworn translation within 3 months from the application date. 14 15

EX-OFFICIO EXAMINATION & APPEAL (2 MONTHS) PUBLICATION of THE REGISTRATION DECISION (3 MONTHS) Examination may take several months from the date of application. The application can be refused due to lack of novelty along with the related articles of the Code. When the Turkish Patent and Trademark Office (the Office) ex-officio examines and then partially or totally refuses the design application, the applicant has a right to appeal this refusal decision in 2 months from the notification date of this decision. The appeal is examined by the Re-Examination and Evaluation Board (REEB), and its decision is final before the Office. If the decision is against the applicant, then 2 months are given from the notification date to initiate court action for the cancellation of this decision before the Civil Court of Intellectual and Industrial Rights. After the ex-officio examination of the application by the Office, the registration decision is published in the Bulletin and opposition may be filed within 3 months following the date of publication of the registration in the Bulletin. If deemed necessary by the REEB, the applicant may have a right to file a counterstatement within one month following the date of opposition notification. If the opposition is totally or partially accepted by the REEB, the applicant or the adverse party has the right to initiate a court action for the cancellation of this decision within 2 months as of the notification date before the Civil Court of Intellectual and Industrial Rights. Court Action: The main focus of court action would be the legal evaluation of the Office s decision. Therefore, regardless of the registration status of the contested design, the proceedings carry on. Also, the court evaluates the case by considering the evidence/ information/documentation submitted during the appeal process. Evidence which is not presented during the appeal phase is very unlikely to affect the court s judgement. Court Action: Similar to the cases against the Office s ex-officio decisions, the main focus of court actions against the REEB decisions would be the legal evaluation of the Office s decision. Therefore, regardless of the registration status of the contested design, the proceedings carry on. Different from the cases against ex-officio decisions, the opposing party must direct the case against the applicant (and vice versa). Also, the court evaluates the case by considering the evidence/ information/documentation submitted during the appeal process. Evidences which is not presented during the appeal phase is very unlikely to affect the court s judgement. 16 17

REGISTRATION & RENEWAL The registration can be renewed every 5 years (up to 25 years in total) starting from the application date. There is also an option for late renewal with a penalty fee 6 months after the expiration date. WHAT HAS CHANGED for PATENTS and UTILITY MODELS with THE NEW TURKISH IP CODE? VALIDITY TERM National and international patent and utility model applications made to the Turkish Patent and Trademark Office (hereinafter referred as the Office) before the date of publication of the new IP Code No. 6769 (January 10, 2017) will be subject to legislation in force at the date of application. Therefore, there will be two different rules and practices for the applications made before and on or after January 10, 2017. EXCEPTIONS TO PATENTABILITY Whereas computer software is removed from subject matters considered as not being an invention by nature, computer programs are among the subject matters that are considered as not being an invention. 18 19

THE NON-PATENTABLE INVENTIONS All methods of therapy including diagnosis and surgery for the treatment of humans or animals, Discovery of elements of the human body, at various stages of formation and development, including the sequence or partial sequence of a gene, Processes for cloning human beings, processes for modifying the germ-line genetic dentity of human beings, use of human embryos for industrial or commercial purposes, processes for modifying the genetic identity of animals which are likely to cause them suffering, without any substantial medical benefit to human or animal, as well as animals resulting from such processes are considered to be unprotected inventions, Whereas biological processes regarding plant varieties or animal races or production thereof are considered non-patentable, an exception applies to microbiological processes, or products obtained by means of such processes and patent protection is provided for developments in these subjects. DOCUMENTS REQUIRED for APPLICATION and FINALIZING THE DATE of APPLICATION Patent application request, Identity and contact information of the applicant, Description or reference to an earlier application prepared in Turkish or in one of the official languages of the States that implement the principle of reciprocity or a Party to the Paris Convention or the Agreement Establishing the World Trade Organization. The patent application date will be finalized as of the date on which the elements are delivered to the Office. The obligation to deliver the claims, drawings and abstract at the time of application has been abolished. The application form, claims, drawings referred to in the description or in the claims, abstract, evidence indicating that the application fee has been paid and the Turkish translation of the description written in one of the official languages of the States that implement the principle of reciprocity are required to be submitted within 2 months from the application date, without the need for any notification. The inventor may wish to keep his/her name confidential. This information has to be given during application. In case the invention is based on genetic resources or traditional knowledge associated with genetic resources, a statement on where this resource was obtained should be included in the patent application. DIVISIONAL APPLICATION Annual fees for a divisional application of the past years are paid on the divisional application request date or within a period of 2 months from the date of this request, without any additional fee or requirement of notification. A search request fee for divisional applications has to be paid at the time of application or within 2 months from the date on which it is stated that there is no deficiency in conformity with the conditions or the notice date indicating that the deficiencies have been remedied in time, without need for any notification. 20 21

SEARCH REQUEST OBJECTION PROCESS A request for search of patent applications is filed at the time of application or within 12 months of the application date without the need for any notification, provided that the fee stated in the Notification is paid. REQUEST for EXAMINATION, PREPARATION of THE EXAMINATION REPORT and THE GRANT of THE PATENT The system without examination providing protection for 7 years has been abolished and a transition to a more efficient patent system has been ensured. The applicant may request the Office to examine the application by paying the fee within 3 months from the date of notification of the search report and may submit his observation on the search report and may amend the description, claims or drawings within this period. If the Office decides that the application or the invention pertaining thereto is not in conformity with the provisions of the law upon examination, the applicant shall be notified and the grounds for refusing the grant of a patent will be explained with justifications. The applicant is requested to provide his opinions to the contrary within a time-period of three months from each notification date or to amend the description, claims or drawings. The number of aforementioned notifications may not exceed three. If it is determined that the invention complies with the provisions of the Law; it is decided to grant a patent. In case any amendments are required in order to grant a patent according to the examination report, the amendments are required to be made within 2 months from the notification date. Third parties may submit their objections to the aforementioned patent within 6 months of the publication of the patent grant decision in the bulletin by asserting at least one of the following justifications; - Does not bear patentability requirements, - The invention is not adequately disclosed, - The first application exceeds its scope. The applicant, patent owner or related third parties may object to the decisions of the Office within 2 months of the decision notification date. ANNUAL FEES The annual fees shall be paid at the end of the second year (3rd year) and each subsequent year at maturity during the full term of the protection period. Where the annual fees have not been paid within the required period, they may be paid within the following six month period of maturity together with the additional fee. Where the annual fees have not been paid within the six month period, the patent right shall expire as of the due date for the payment of this fee and a notification will be made and upon the payment of the outstanding fee within 2 months from the date of notification, the patent right shall regain validity as of the payment date. 22 23

CONVERTING A PATENT APPLICATION INTO AN APPLICATION for A UTILITY MODEL The patent applicant may request the conversion of his ongoing patent application into an application for utility model following the examination of his application until the publishing of the patent grant or from the notification date of the refusal decision within the 2 months period for filing objections. Where the request for such conversion is filed, a request for search shall be filed by submitting the required documents if any, together with the search fee within one month from the notification date of the Office. CONVERTING AN APPLICATION for A UTILITY MODEL INTO A PATENT APPLICATION The utility model applicant may request the conversion of his ongoing utility model application into a patent application at the latest from the notification date of the search report until the expiry of the 3 month period. Where the request for such conversion is filed, a request for search shall be filed by submitting the required documents if any, together with the search fee within one month from the notification date of the Office. CONTINUATION of PROCESSES AND REINSTATEMENT of RIGHTS In case of failure to comply with the period for processing of a patent application, the applicant may request to continue with the processing by paying the fee within 2 months from the notification date of the consequence of noncompliance to the time period. A request for reinstatement may be presented within 2 months from the removal of the cause of the failure to observe the time limit, not exceeding one year from the date of expiration of the applicable time limit, by paying the fee. DEPENDENT PATENT An application for Dependent Patent may be filed until the publication of the decision for issuing a document for the main patent application. In case the main patent right expires due to non-payment of the annual fee, the Dependent Patent is converted to an independent patent. COMPULSORY LICENSE Those concerned may claim a compulsory license on the date of the compulsory license request, as of the termination of a time period of 3 years from the publication of the decision to grant a patent on the Bulletin, or of 4 years from the date of the patent application, whichever is later, on the grounds that: - Failure to put to use/work the patented invention, or - There are no serious and real initiatives for use, or - The use does not meet the national market requirement. UTILITY MODEL INVENTIONS NON-PROTECTABLE BY UTILITY MODEL Inventions and biotechnological inventions pertaining to pharmaceutical substances or methods relating to pharmaceuticals or products obtained therefrom have been added among inventions nonprotectable by the utility model. 24 25

DOCUMENTS REQUIRED for APPLICATION AND FINALIZING THE DATE of APPLICATION Utility model grant request, Identity and contact information of the applicant, Description or reference to an earlier application prepared in Turkish or in one of the official languages of the States that implement the principle of reciprocity or are a Party to the Paris Convention or the Agreement Establishing the World Trade Organization. The utility model date will be finalized as of the date that the above elements are delivered to the Office. The obligation to deliver the claims, drawings and abstract at the time of application has been abolished. The application form, claims, drawings referred to in the description or in the claims, abstract, evidence indicating that the application fee has been paid and the Turkish translation of the description written in one of the official languages of the States that implement the principle of reciprocity are required to be submitted within 2 months as of the application date without the need for any notification. The inventor may wish to keep his/her name confidential. This information has to be given during application. SEARCH REQUEST A requirement for examination report has been imposed as an obligation for utility models. A search request fee for utility models shall be paid at the time of application or within 2 months from the date on which it is stated that there is no deficiency in conformity with the conditions or the notice date indicating that the deficiencies have been remedied in time, without the need for any notification. OBJECTION PROCESS AND ISSUING UTILITY MODEL CERTIFICATE The applicant may object to the contents of the search report by adding relevant documents within 3 months from the publication of the search report, and third parties may submit their opinions. If, as the result of the evaluation of the Office, it is found necessary to make amendments in order to grant the utility model, it is required to make amendments within 2 months from the date of notification. In case no amendments are made or not accepted by the Office, the application is considered to be withdrawn. As a result of the evaluation, if the Office decides that the application and the pertaining invention does not comply with the provisions of the Law; the application is rejected. The decisions taken by the Office may be objected to within 2 months from the date of notification. 26 27

PATENT APPLICATION PROCESS in line with NEW TURKISH IP CODE The patent registration period is decreased from 17-42 months to 7-27 months by simplifying and shortening the patent granting processes. The following processes are valid for applications made on or after January 10 th, 2017 when the new IP Code No. 6769 was officially adopted. For applications made before this date, the former Decrees will remain in force. Documents or information required for the filing of a patent application are as follows: a description defining the subject matter of the invention; the claims;, the abstract; a completed application form, in Turkish or in one of the official languages of the States that implement the principle of reciprocity or are a Party to the Paris Convention or the Agreement Establishing the World Trade Organization; any drawings/ illustrations referred to in the description or the claims; documentation of application fee payment. PROCEDURAL EXAMINATION A procedural conformity or procedural deficiency notification for the description set that has been examined regarding conformity with procedural conditions is made after the application. In the event of a notification of procedural deficiency; the procedural deficiencies should be corrected within 2 months from the date of notification. Otherwise, the application will be rejected. If a notification of procedural conformity is made, a request for search must be filed by paying the fee at application or within 12 months of the application date, without any necessity for notification. SEARCH REPORT A Search Report is issued after the request for search is filed. However, it may not be possible to issue a report due to the fact that some claims of the application fall within the scope of the non-patentable subjects or the description or all the claims are not sufficiently clear. In this case, any objections or amendments in this matter must be submitted within 3 months from the date of notification. The application is rejected if the arrangements are not made within this time or if the objections or amendments are not approved by the Turkish Patent and Trademark Office. In addition, the search report is published for 6 months after its notification. REQUEST for EXAMINATION and EXAMINATION REPORT A request for examination is filed by paying the fee within 3 months of the date on which the search report is notified. If it is determined that the invention does not comply with the provisions of the Law; a notification is made to the applicant to submit his/her opinions and make an amendment. The number of these notifications cannot exceed three. The applicant has 3 months to submit his/her opinion and make amendments. If it is determined that the invention complies with the provisions of the Law; it is decided to grant a patent. In cases where an amendment is required in order to grant a patent, the amendment is to be made within 2 months from the date of notification. 28 29

GRANT DECISION Upon the issuance of the Law the registration is finalized by the payment of the related fee within 2 months. OBJECTION PROCESS The patent application is published in the Bulletin and third parties are accorded the right to submit an opinion on the patentability of the invention. However, third parties cannot be a party to the operations in the presence of the Office at this stage. The decision to grant a patent is published in the Bulletin and the third party is entitled to object. Third parties may object by giving one of the following justifications and by paying the fee within 6 months from the publication of the patent grant decision; - The invention does not bear patentability requirements, - The invention is not sufficiently clear, - The subject matter of the patent is beyond the scope of its original case at the application. In case the objection is not filed or is deemed not filed, the decision regarding granting the patent becomes final and the final decision is published in the Bulletin. In case of an objection; the applicant is required to submit an opinion and to make an amendmentn within 3 months of the notification date. The appeal is examined by the Board, taking into account the views and requests of the patent owner for amendments to the patent. If the Board considers the patent or its amended version as partly eligible, the patent owner is required to make the necessary changes within 2 months. UTILITY MODEL APPLICATION PROCESS in line with NEW TURKISH IP CODE The following processes are valid for applications made on or after January 10 th, 2017, when the new IP Code No. 6769 was officially adopted. For applications made before this date, the former Decrees will remain in force. Documents or information required for the filing of a utility model app are as follows: a full description of the subject matter of the invention; the claims; the abstract; a completed application form in Turkish, or in one of the official languages of the States that implement the principle of reciprocity or are a Party to the Paris Convention or the Agreement Establishing the World Trade Organization; any drawings/illustrations, referred to in the description or the claims; and documentation of application fee payment. Also, optionally, a request for search as well as documentation of the request for search fee payment may be given during the application. PROCEDURAL EXAMINATION A procedural conformity or procedural deficiency notification for the description set that has been examined regarding conformity with procedural conditions is made after the application. In the event of a notification of procedural deficiency, procedural deficiencies should be remedied within 2 months from the date of notification. Otherwise, the application will be rejected. A request for search must be filed by paying the required fee within 2 months of the notification date on which the procedural deficiencies are remedied. 30 31

A request for search must be filed by paying the required fee within 2 months of the date of notification that the application had no deficiencies with regard to conformity to the procedural conditions. If the request for search is filed with the application, there is no need for a search report request after procedural conformity notification. PRESENTATION of OBJECTION and OPINIONS TO THE SEARCH REPORT SEARCH REPORT A Search Report is issued after the request for search is filed. However, it may not be possible to issue a report due to the fact that some claims of the application fall within the scope of non-patentable subjects or the description or all the claims are not sufficiently clear. In this case, any objections or amendments in this matter must be submitted within 3 months from the date of notification. The application is rejected if the arrangements are not made within this time or if the objections or amendments are not approved by the Turkish Patent and Trademark Office. In addition, the search report is issued 3 months after its notification. The applicant may object to the contents of the search report by adding relevant documents within 3 months from the publication of the search report, and third persons may submit their opinions. In case the applicant does not object or no opinion is presented by a third party, and only the search report is subjected to an objection or a presentation of an opinion, the search report, objections or opinions are evaluated. If, as the result of the evaluation of the Office, it is found necessary to make amendments in order to be able to grant the utility model, it is required to make amendments within 2 months from the date of notification. GRANT DECISION Upon the issuance of the Law, registration is finalized by the payment of the related document regulation fee within 2 months. 32 33

WHO IS Following our foundation in 1984, we have continued adding new works to our portfolio in each year. We are proud to say, as of today, that we have more than 20.000 clients. We, as Grup Ofis, protect our clients IP rights with our expert attorneys and provide consultancy services. With our up-to-date equipment and modern IP software, we can file applications specifically to Turkey and Northern Cyprus. Our dedication to fight against infringements, piracy and unfair competition and our rational and reasonable pricing system allows us to be a primary choice for the leading IP rights holders around the world. For more information please contact us via info@grupofis.com.? 34 35

36