UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

Similar documents
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Plaintiff, Defendants. COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Plaintiff, Defendants. COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

Case 1:99-mc Document 417 Filed 05/23/12 Page 1 of 10 PageID #: IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE ) ) ) Plaintiff,

Case 2:16-cv Document 1 Filed 12/09/16 Page 1 of 8 PageID #: 1

Case 2:15-cv Document 1 Filed 04/14/15 Page 1 of 12 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION

Case 2:15-cv Document 1 Filed 04/14/15 Page 1 of 7 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION

Case 2:16-cv Document 1 Filed 12/09/16 Page 1 of 8 PageID #: 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

Case 1:11-cv LPS Document 14 Filed 01/30/12 Page 1 of 7 PageID #: 59 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

Case 1:10-cv GMS Document 1-3 Filed 06/21/10 Page 1 of 11 PageID #: 71 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA WESTERN DIVISION Case No: 5:11-cv ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION PLAINTIFF S ORIGINAL COMPLAINT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION. Plaintiff, Case No: COMPLAINT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

Case 6:17-cv Document 1 Filed 04/05/17 Page 1 of 10 PageID #: 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA WESTERN DIVISION Case No: 5:15-cv-590 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS. Plaintiff, Civil Action No.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION. Case No. 3:13-cv N

Case: 1:16-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 11/15/16 Page 1 of 8 PageID #:1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

Case 6:15-cv Document 1 Filed 01/13/15 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION COMPLAINT

Case 1:11-cv REB Document 1 Filed 12/15/11 Page 1 of 5

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

Case 1:15-cv RWS Document 1 Filed 05/30/14 Page 1 of 11 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS. Civil Action No. COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT AND DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL

Case 6:18-cv Document 1 Filed 01/31/18 Page 1 of 9 PageID #: 1

Case 2:16-cv Document 1 Filed 12/05/16 Page 1 of 5 PageID #: 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION PLAINTIFF S ORIGINAL COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

Case 2:18-cv Document 1 Filed 05/09/18 Page 1 of 11 PageID #: 1

PLAINTIFF S ORIGINAL COMPLAINT. Plaintiff Newthink, LLC ( Plaintiff ), by and through its undersigned counsel, files this

Case 1:19-cv PKC Document 1 Filed 01/14/19 Page 1 of 5

Case 2:16-cv RJS Document 2 Filed 09/29/16 Page 1 of 15

Case 1:16-cv UNA Document 1 Filed 04/19/16 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE COMPLAINT

Case 1:16-cv Document 1 Filed 09/22/16 Page 1 of 6

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NOTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS. Plaintiff, CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:18-cv v. JURY TRIAL DEMANDED

Case 2:10-cv GW-PLA Document 89 Filed 05/12/11 Page 1 of 7 Page ID #:455

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION. Plaintiff, CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:18-cv-3055

Courthouse News Service

Case 1:17-cv LY Document 1 Filed 03/17/17 Page 1 of 22 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

Case 2:16-cv JRG-RSP Document 1 Filed 10/19/16 Page 1 of 8 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

Case 5:16-cv Document 1 Filed 11/07/16 Page 1 of 7

Case 3:17-cv AJB-KSC Document 1 Filed 05/23/17 PageID.1 Page 1 of 8

Case5:14-cv PSG Document1 Filed10/10/14 Page1 of 10. Attorneys for Plaintiff ENPHASE ENERGY, INC. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

Case 1:17-cv RGS Document 1 Filed 07/12/17 Page 1 of 11 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

Case 2:14-cv JRG Document 1 Filed 09/12/14 Page 1 of 14 PageID #: 1 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) JURY TRIAL DEMANDED COMPLAINT

Case 8:17-cv EAK-JSS Document 114 Filed 07/30/18 Page 1 of 11 PageID 2433 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE COMPLAINT

Case 1:99-mc Document 391 Filed 05/17/12 Page 1 of 11 PageID #: IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

Case 2:14-cv Document 1 Filed 10/10/14 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TEXARKANA DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

Case 2:15-cv MJP Document 21 Filed 02/11/14 Page 1 of 11 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI EASTERN DIVISION

Case 2:14-cv PMW Document 4 Filed 01/05/15 Page 1 of 20

Case 2:17-cv Document 1 Filed 03/02/17 Page 1 of 21 PageID: 1

Courthouse News Service

Case 6:15-cv Document 1 Filed 04/06/15 Page 1 of 5 PageID #: 1

Case 1:14-cv Document 1 Filed 02/18/14 Page 1 of 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS AUSTIN DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY LOUISVILLE DIVISION

Case 1:17-cv UNA Document 1 Filed 09/15/17 Page 1 of 10 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION. Plaintiff, Civil Action No.

Case 1:10-cv Document 1 Filed 02/09/10 Page 1 of 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

Case 2:11-cv ECR -PAL Document 1 Filed 02/25/11 Page 1 of 6

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON PORTLAND DIVISION

Case 1:14-cv JEI-KMW Document 1 Filed 09/23/14 Page 1 of 6 PageID: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

Case 2:17-cv Document 1 Filed 08/23/17 Page 1 of 13 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Case 1:06-cv JJF Document 1 Filed 05/03/06 Page 1 of 14 PageID #: 224 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

Case 1:13-cv DJC Document 17 Filed 08/14/13 Page 1 of 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

Case 1:16-cv UNA Document 1 Filed 10/20/16 Page 1 of 7 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

Case 2:17-cv Document 1 Filed 03/01/17 Page 1 of 5 PageID #: 1

Case 2:16-cv RWS Document 1 Filed 10/14/16 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 1

Plaintiff Privacy Pop, LLC ( Plaintiff ) complains and alleges as follows against Defendant Gimme Gimme, LLC ( Defendant ).

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS LUFKIN DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION. Civil Action No: HON. COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

Case 1:16-cv Document 1 Filed 03/04/16 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 1

Case 4:16-cv Document 1 Filed 11/15/16 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 1

cij;'l~jl NO~ AC..

Case 1:17-cv Document 1 Filed 12/11/17 Page 1 of 17 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS AUSTIN DIVISION

Case 2:13-cv RAJ Document 1 Filed 08/30/10 Page 1 of 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION PLAINTIFF S ORIGINAL COMPLAINT

Case 2:18-cv JRG Document 1 Filed 05/09/18 Page 1 of 12 PageID #: 1

Case 2:15-cv JRG Document 1 Filed 07/08/15 Page 1 of 5 PageID #: 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

Case 2:17-cv JLL-JAD Document 1 Filed 05/12/17 Page 1 of 17 PageID: 1

Case 1:16-cv Document 1 Filed 06/05/16 Page 1 of 7

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION

Case 9:16-cv RLR Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/15/2016 Page 1 of 6

Case 1:13-cv GMS Document 23 Filed 03/12/14 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 117 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

Case 1:18-cv YK Document 1 Filed 06/07/18 Page 1 of 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

Case 2:16-cv RWS Document 1 Filed 09/19/16 Page 1 of 10 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION

Transcription:

Case 1:99-mc-09999 Document 186 Filed 04/29/11 Page 1 of 9 PageID #: 17113 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE AUGME TECHNOLOGIES, INC., Plaintiff, Civil Action No. v. PANDORA MEDIA, INC., JURY TRIAL DEMANDED Defendant. COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT 1. Plaintiff Augme Technologies, Inc. ( Augme or Plaintiff ), by and through its attorneys, hereby demands a jury trial and complains of Defendant Pandora Media, Inc. ( Pandora or Defendant ) as follows: NATURE OF THE ACTION 2. This is an action for patent infringement arising under the patent laws of the United States, 35 U.S.C. 271, et seq., to enjoin infringement and obtain damages resulting from Defendant s unauthorized manufacture, use, offer for sale, sale and/or importation into the United States for subsequent use or sale of products, methods, processes, services and/or systems that infringe one or more claims of United States Patent No. 7,831,690 (the 690 Patent ) (attached as Exhibit A) entitled Appliance Metaphor For Adding Media Function To A Web Page. Plaintiff seeks injunctive relief to prevent Defendant from continuing to infringe Plaintiff s patent. In addition, Plaintiff seeks a recovery of monetary damages resulting from Defendant s past infringement of this patent. 3. This action for patent infringement involves Defendant s manufacture, use, offer for sale, sale and/or importation into the United States of infringing products, methods, processes,

Case 1:99-mc-09999 Document 186 Filed 04/29/11 Page 2 of 9 PageID #: 17114 services and/or systems that are primarily used or primarily adapted for use in an electronic or computer network system for targeting content via a Web browser. THE PARTIES 4. Plaintiff Augme is a corporation organized under the laws of the State of Delaware, with its principal place of business at 43 West 24th Street, 11 th Floor, New York, New York 10010. 5. Plaintiff Augme is the lawful assignee of all right, title and interest in and to the 690 Patent. 6. Augme was founded in 1999 and provides content targeting and consumer centric content delivery technologies for Internet products and services. These technologies enable businesses to, inter alia, provide streaming media content via media appliance metaphors on a web page and target advertisements to internet users. By providing targeted advertisements, an advertiser can more effectively (and efficiently) reach the desired audience. The media appliance metaphor is customized and compliments the information content of the Web page. 7. Upon information and belief, Defendant Pandora is a corporation organized under the laws of the State of Delaware with a principal place of business located at 2101 Webster Street, Suite 1650, Oakland, California 94612. 8. Upon information and belief, Pandora makes, uses, offers to sell, sells and/or imports into the United States certain interactive media marketing platforms, applications, services, systems, and/or methods that enable marketers to integrate music and video and other digital content to deliver promotions that are personalized based upon characteristics of the user. -2-

Case 1:99-mc-09999 Document 186 Filed 04/29/11 Page 3 of 9 PageID #: 17115 JURISDICTION AND VENUE 9. This Court has jurisdiction over the subject matter of this patent infringement action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1331 and 1338(a). 10. Defendant is subject to personal jurisdiction in the State of Delaware because it is a citizen of the State of Delaware and it regularly transacts business in this judicial district and division by, among other things, offering its products and services to customers, business affiliates and partners located in this judicial district and division. In addition, Defendant has committed acts of direct infringement, contributory infringement, and/or inducement of infringement of one or more of the claims of the patent-in-suit in this judicial district and division. 11. Venue is proper in this district pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1391(b), 1391(c), and 1400(b) because Defendant is subject to personal jurisdiction in this district and has committed acts of infringement in this district. FACTUAL BACKGROUND 12. The 690 Patent generally describes a media appliance metaphor of a real world device, such as a radio, that is displayed on a Web page. This media appliance metaphor is automatically customized to deliver media content, such as music, based upon the information content of the Web page. By way of example, the 690 Patent discloses a radio playing country music on a Web page about Texas cooking. 13. The 690 Patent was duly and legally issued on November 9, 2010. 14. Plaintiff Augme is the assignee of all right, title and interest in and to the 690 Patent and has the legal right to enforce the 690 Patent against the Defendant in this case. -3-

Case 1:99-mc-09999 Document 186 Filed 04/29/11 Page 4 of 9 PageID #: 17116 Defendant s Products, Services, Systems, and Processes Infringe Augme s Patents 15. Defendant makes, uses, offers to sell, sells and/or imports products and services that infringe the 690 Patent. Defendant directly infringes, contributorily infringes and/or induces others to infringe one or more claims of the 690 Patent. By way of example, and without limitation, Pandora makes, uses, offers to sell, sells and/or imports the Pandora Internet Radio service. Based upon publicly available information found on http://www.pandora.com, Defendant infringes the 690 Patent. 16. By way of example, and without limitation, the accused Pandora Internet Radio service displays a media appliance metaphor of a radio within the www.pandora.com Web page (as shown in Exhibit B). While the Web page is being displayed on a Web browser, this radio module is stored in the memory of the computer running the Web browser and executes on that computer to stream audio content. Upon initial launch of the Pandora Web page, the computer running the Web browser provides information to the Pandora server to automatically customize the Pandora Web page and radio service. After determination of the preferences set on the computer running the web browser, the Pandora Internet Radio module is configured and loaded automatically in such a way as to complement the music format and appearance of the Pandora Web page. 17. In addition, by way of example, and without limitation, the Pandora Internet Radio module also provides advertisements and videos that are customized based on the end user s computing environment, and other targeting criteria. 18. Based upon publicly available information, the accused Pandora Internet Radio performs every element of one or more of the claims in the 690 Patent. Augme reserves the right to supplement or amend the list of accused products/services after reviewing non-publicly -4-

Case 1:99-mc-09999 Document 186 Filed 04/29/11 Page 5 of 9 PageID #: 17117 available information through discovery. Augme Has Been Irreparably Harmed by Defendant s Continued Infringement 19. Plaintiff Augme has been irreparably harmed by Defendant s infringement of its valuable patent rights. Moreover, Defendant s unauthorized, infringing use of Plaintiff s patented systems and methods has threatened the value of this intellectual property because Defendant s conduct results in Plaintiff s loss of its lawful patent rights to exclude others from making, using, offering to sell, selling and/or importing the patented inventions. 20. Defendant s disregard for Plaintiff s property rights similarly threatens Plaintiff s relationships with potential licensees of this intellectual property. Defendant will derive a competitive advantage over any of Plaintiff s future licensees from using Plaintiff s patented technology without paying compensation for such use. Accordingly, unless and until Defendant s continued acts of infringement are enjoined, Plaintiff will suffer further irreparable harm for which there is no adequate remedy at law. COUNT I Infringement of United States Patent No. 7,831,690 21. Paragraphs 1 through 20 are incorporated by reference as if fully restated herein. 22. Plaintiff Augme is the assignee and lawful owner of all right, title and interest in and to the 690 Patent. 23. Defendant makes, uses, offers to sell, sells and/or imports into the United States for subsequent sale or use products, services, methods or processes that infringe, directly and/or indirectly, or which employ systems, components and/or steps that make use of systems or processes that infringe, directly and/or indirectly, one or more of the claims of the 690 Patent. 24. Defendant has been and will continue infringing one or more of the claims of the -5-

Case 1:99-mc-09999 Document 186 Filed 04/29/11 Page 6 of 9 PageID #: 17118 690 Patent through the aforesaid acts, and will continue to do so unless enjoined by this Court. Defendant s wrongful conduct has caused Plaintiff to suffer irreparable harm resulting from the loss of its lawful patent rights to exclude others from making, using, offering to sell, selling and importing the patented inventions. 25. Upon information and belief, Defendant has been inducing and/or contributing to the infringement of the 690 Patent and will continue to induce and/or contribute to the infringement of the 690 Patent, in violation of 35 U.S.C. 271(b) and (c), unless enjoined by this Court. 26. Plaintiff is entitled to recover damages adequate to compensate for the infringement pursuant to 35 U.S.C. 284 and is entitled to injunctive relief pursuant to 35 U.S.C. 283. PRAYER FOR RELIEF WHEREFORE, Plaintiff prays for judgment against Defendant, granting Plaintiff the following relief: A. That this Court adjudge and decree that the 690 Patent is valid and enforceable against Defendant; B. That this Court adjudge and decree that Defendant has infringed, directly and indirectly, the 690 Patent; C. That this Court permanently enjoin Defendant, and its parents, subsidiaries, affiliates, successors and assigns, and each of its officers, directors, employees, representatives, agents, and attorneys, and all persons acting in concert or active participation with, or on its behalf, or within its control, from making, using, offering to sell, selling, importing, or advertising products and/or services and/or employing systems, hardware, software and/or components and/or making use of systems or processes that infringe any of the claims of the -6-

Case 1:99-mc-09999 Document 186 Filed 04/29/11 Page 7 of 9 PageID #: 17119 patents-in-suit, or otherwise engaging in acts of infringement of the patents-in-suit, all as alleged herein; D. That this Court order an accounting, including a post-verdict accounting, to determine the damages to be awarded to Plaintiff as a result of Defendant s infringement; E. That this Court, pursuant to 35 U.S.C. 284, enter an award to Plaintiff of such damages as it shall prove at trial against Defendant that are adequate to compensate Plaintiff for said infringement, said damages to be no less than a reasonable royalty together with interest and costs; F. That this Court assess pre-judgment and post-judgment interest and costs against Defendant, together with an award of such interest and costs, in accordance with 35 U.S.C. 284; G. That this Court declare this case to be exceptional and direct Defendant to pay Augme s attorneys fees incurred in connection with this lawsuit pursuant to 35 U.S.C. 285; and H. Grant to Plaintiff such other, further, and different relief as may be just and proper. JURY DEMAND Plaintiff demands a trial by jury of all matters to which it is entitled to trial by jury pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 38. -7-

Case 1:99-mc-09999 Document 186 Filed 04/29/11 Page 8 of 9 PageID #: 17120 Dated: April 29, 2011 Respectfully submitted, Of Counsel Thomas J. Scott Jr. Jennifer A. Albert GOODWIN PROCTER LLP 901 New York Avenue NW Washington, DC 20001 Tel.: 202.346.4000 Fax: 202.346.4444 jalbert@goodwinprocter.com tscott@goodwinprocter.com /s/ Edmond D. Johnson Edmond D. Johnson (Del. Bar No. 2257) James G. McMillan, III (Del. Bar No. 3979) PEPPER HAMILTON LLP Hercules Plaza, Suite 5100 1313 Market Street P.O. Box 1709 Wilmington, DE 19899-1709 Tel.: 302.777.6500 Fax.: 302.421.8390 johnsone@pepperlaw.com Attorneys for Plaintiff Augme Technologies, Inc. -8-

Case 1:99-mc-09999 Document 186 Filed 04/29/11 Page 9 of 9 PageID #: 17121