TEXAS OPEN MEETINGS ACT: UPDATE 2017 NORTH AND EAST TEXAS COUNTY JUDGES AND COMMISSIONERS ASSOCIATION ANNUAL CONFERENCE MAY 17, 2017 BEAUMONT, TEXAS

Similar documents
BOARD MEETINGS (LEGAL)

Judicial Immunity School for County Commissioners Court V. G. Young Institute for County Government College Station, Texas February 17, 2016

TEXAS OPEN MEETINGS ACT LAWS MADE EASY

Open Meetings Act Meeting Notice

GREG ABBOTT. May 18,2005. You ask about the proper construction of section of the Government Code and whether it is unconstitutionally vague.

DEC Hearings. A Discussion of Issues Regarding the DEC Hearing Process. Leo L. Barnes, JD Director, Policy & Compliance

MADE EASY Texas Conflict of Interest Laws. Zindia Thomas Local Government Section / Office of the Attorney General (512)

Withstanding Legal Attacks on Annexation

CAUSE NO. D-1-GN DANIEL TRISTAN IN THE DISTRICT COURT Plaintiff. v. TRAVIS COUNTY

TEXAS COUNCIL Board Training: Trustee Roles and Responsibilities

SPECIAL MEETING OF THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES HOUSTON COMMUNITY COLLEGE. February 7, Minutes

OPEN MEETING LAWS IN CALIFORNIA: RALPH M. BROWN ACT

Use of Public Funds TASB Legal Services Texas Association of School Boards

Public Access Laws: The Open Door Law. Karen Arland Ice Miller LLP December 15, 2016

TEXAS COUNCIL Board Training: Trustee Roles and Responsibilities

Use of Public Funds. Published online in TASB School Law esource. TASB Legal Services. Texas Association of School Boards

1 of 1 DOCUMENT. SHERYL JOHNSON-TODD, Appellant V. JOHN S. MORGAN, Appellee NO CV COURT OF APPEALS OF TEXAS, NINTH DISTRICT, BEAUMONT

WISCONSIN OPEN MEETINGS LAW , Wisconsin Statutes

OPEN MEETINGS LAW I. ARTICLE XII, SECTION 3, LOUISIANA CONSTITUTION

Municipal Records And Open Records. Zindia Thomas Assistant General Counsel Texas Municipal League

This Chapter shall be known and may be cited as the Open Meetings Law.

Taking Bail Notes. 1. Introduction. a. Importance of Pretrial Release

The Open Meetings Law: Understandings and Implications

COURT STRUCTURE OF TEXAS

Open Governmental Proceedings Act. A Guide to the West Virginia WEST VIRGINIA ETHICS COMMISSION. Also known as the Sunshine Law or Open Meetings Law

Comprehensive Brown Act Training for Boards and Staff

prohibited expenditures and contributions under , , & of the

MISSOURI SUNSHINE LAW

Government Pre-Suit Investigative Powers:

ARIZONA S OPEN MEETING LAW. Christina Estes-Werther, General Counsel April 29, 2015

TEXAS ETHICS COMMISSION

TOP LEGAL QUESTIONS TML LEGAL SERVICES

CAUSE NO ZACK MAXWELL, IN THE DISTRICT COURT

THE WEST VIRGINIA OPEN GOVERNMENTAL PROCEEDINGS ACT

Case 1:18-cv Document 2 Filed 06/18/18 Page 1 of 22 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS AUSTIN DIVISION

NO. TO THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS. DEMARCUS ANTONIO TAYLOR, Appellant v. The State of Texas, Appellee ***************

Kansas Legislator Briefing Book 2012

Gain Attention: Use opener here that gives examples of famous TV district attorneys and their roles.

This article shall be known and may be cited as the "Mississippi Credit Availability Act."

Legal Q&A By Zindia Thomas, TML Assistant General Counsel

Van Alstyne ISD Board Operating Procedures. Revised October, 2015

NO. P-09-CV-59 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS PECOS DIVISION

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

TIMOTHY J. CRUZ DISTRICT ATTORNEY

TEXAS ETHICS COMMISSION

ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS

City of Mesquite Districting City Council Districts. Presented By: Gunnar Seaquist Partner, Bickerstaff Heath Delgado Acosta LLP

Step-by-Step Commentary Accompanying Records Request Flowchart for Justice and Municipal Courts March 2014

Policy No Board of Directors

7112. Authority to execute compact. The Governor of Pennsylvania, on behalf of this State, is hereby authorized to execute a compact in substantially

Judge Emily Miskel, 470 th District Court emilymiskel.com

Case 7:18-cv DC Document 18 Filed 03/16/18 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MIDLAND/ODESSA DIVISION

THE CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF SAANICH BYLAW NO TO REGULATE THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE COUNCIL AND COUNCIL COMMITTEES

TEXAS ETHICS COMMISSION RULES

Step-by-Step Commentary Accompanying Records Request Flowchart for Justice and Municipal Courts October 2011

IN THE TENTH COURT OF APPEALS. No CV. From the 335th District Court Burleson County, Texas Trial Court No. 26,407 MEMORANDUM OPINION

Health Practitioners Competence Assurance Act 2003 Complaints and Discipline Process

COURT OF APPEALS EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS EL PASO, TEXAS

March 25,2002. Opinion No. JC-0480

AGREED MOTION TO EXTEND EXPERT DEADLINES. Plaintiffs, Gilbert Joe Cisneros, Catherine Garcia Sonnier, Martha Gonzalez,

BROWN ACT AND OAKLAND SUNSHINE ORDINANCE OVERVIEW v1 January

STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT, SOUTHERN DIVISION Docket No cv-00340

CHAPTER 8 OPEN GOVERNMENT LAW

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

Shelby County v. Holder and the Demise of Section 5: What is Next for Voting Rights in Texas?

I. The Kansas Open Meetings Act (KOMA)

I Said So and So Does the Constitution

The Honorable Tim Curry - Page 2

C. Robert Heath S. MoPac Expressway, Building One, Suite 300 Austin, Texas 78746

RULES OF PROCEDURE FOR MEETINGS OF THE NEW HANOVER COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS I. APPLICABILITY

Applies to: All Governing Bodies of public agencies Standing Committees of Governing Bodies Any Committee with two or more members of the Governing Bo

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

GUIDE FOR SUBMISSIONS PURSUANT TO THE TEXAS ENVIRONMENTAL, HEALTH, AND SAFETY AUDIT PRIVILEGE ACT

COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH

COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH

Minnesota s Open Meeting Law: An Overview Office of General Counsel September 18, 2010

CITY OF ST. PETERSBURG COMMUNITY PLANNING & PRESERVATION COMMISSION PUBLIC HEARING Council Chambers February 11, 2014 AGENDA ALTERNATES:

Kansas Open Meetings Act

STUDY SESSION AGENDA. 4. Discuss Completion of Historic Preservation Engagement Project

Office of the Attorney General State of Texas. Opinion No. JC October 17, 2000

Employee COMPLAINT FORM - LEVEL ONE. 1. Name: 2. Address: 3. Telephone number: ( ) 4. Campus:

Court of Appeals. First District of Texas

TEXAS ASSOCIATION OF COUNTIES

DATE ISSUED: 10/17/ of 4 UPDATE 98 DGBA(LEGAL)-P

CONTEMPT OF COURT ACT

Court of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont

Conflict Disclosures for Board Members and District Employees 1

Emily Miskel, KoonsFuller PC emilymiskel.com

Habeas Corpus. In Municipal Court. Presented by: Judge Pamela Harrell Liston

Case 6:15-cv WSS Document 25 Filed 12/18/15 Page 1 of 10

EF&R BOARD OF DIRECTORS ADMINISTRATIVE POLICY

CHAPTER 7 OPEN MEETINGS. Table of Contents History of Arizona's Open Meeting Law. Government Bodies Covered by the Open Meeting Law

Lobbying Disclosure. What s New in This Guide. The following changes/additions have been made since the previous version of this guide:

ICF Sample Coaching Agreement

Case 1:16-cv LY Document 1 Filed 11/17/16 Page 1 of 31 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS AUSTIN DIVISION

Introduction to the Kansas Open Meetings Act (KOMA) Michael J. Smith Assistant Attorney General LOGIC Division

Transparency Laws: Brown Act and Public Records Act for Public Education Agencies

*PROPOSED* 2017 Washington County Board of Supervisors Bylaws & Rules of Procedure Page 1

County-Level Court Civil Filing Fees Prepared by the Office of Court Administration (OCA) Effective January 1, 2018

Recent Developments in Federal and State Arbitration Law

Transcription:

TEXAS OPEN MEETINGS ACT: UPDATE 2017 NORTH AND EAST TEXAS COUNTY JUDGES AND COMMISSIONERS ASSOCIATION ANNUAL CONFERENCE MAY 17, 2017 BEAUMONT, TEXAS Charles R. Kimbrough and Joshua Katz Bickerstaff Heath Delgado Acosta LLP 3711 South MoPac Expressway Building One, Suite 300 Austin, Texas 78746 (512) 472-8021 (512) 320-5638 Facsimile www.bickerstaff.com Bickerstaff Heath Delgado Acosta LLP 2017 Slide 1

PRELIMINARY REMARKS You work as a public servant -- you serve in challenging times. Contentious circumstances often exist regarding important, complex issues within the scope of your official duties. Traps exist for the public servant who is unaware of the latest developments in the open government laws of Texas -- including the Texas Open Meetings Act (TOMA) and the Texas Public Information Act (TPIA). A clear understanding of the Texas open government laws -- resulting from your continued effort to pursue and complete regular training -- will provide the best opportunity for you to avoid the serious problems associated with an alleged open government violation. Slide 2

OPEN MEETING TRAINING: REQUIRED BY LAW TOMA = Texas Open Meetings Act (Ch. 551, TEX. GOV T CODE) Stakes are high -- CIVIL AND CRIMINAL suits can be filed against TOMA violator Open Meetings Training = Important Risk Management Tool for Local Gov t Officials IT S THE LAW: each elected/appointed member of governmental body shall complete 1-hour of approved training within 90-days of oath or otherwise assuming responsibilities of office; and course completion certificate must be filed with governmental body for public inspection TEX. GOV T CODE 551.005, 551.141-551.146 Slide 3

TEXAS ATTORNEY GENERAL (TXOAG) OPEN MEETINGS HANDBOOK TXOAG publishes the Open Meetings Handbook IT S FREE -- Download from TXOAG website Contains latest TOMA statutory amendments/analysis, case law, and TXOAG opinions regarding open meeting issues VALUABLE RESOURCE TOOL -- OBTAIN AND READ THIS HANDBOOK Slide 4

HISTORY AND POLICY GOALS TOMA enacted in 1967 by Texas Legislature POLICY GOAL = To provide for meaningful public participation in government GENERAL RULES: Every meeting is open to the public. Actions taken in violation of TOMA are voidable. Any interested person (including the media) can file a civil suit to void actions taken in violation of TOMA. Criminal prosecution may result from TOMA violations. TEX. GOV T CODE 551.001-.002, 551.141-.146 Slide 5

KEY DEFINITIONS Meeting -- means deliberation between a quorum of a body subject to TOMA during which public business is discussed or considered. Deliberation -- means a verbal exchange (including oral or written communication) during a meeting between a quorum of a governmental body, or between that quorum and another person, concerning the public business of the governmental entity. Governmental Body -- includes a school district board, city council, and county commissioners court, as well as other entities and committees. Quorum -- means a majority of the governmental body, unless differently defined by other law. Recording -- means any type of audio or audiovisual recording may be used to make the record of a meeting. TEX. GOV T CODE 551.001 Slide 6

WALKING QUORUM PROHIBITED Under TOMA 551.143, it is a crime to knowingly conspire to circumvent the requirements of TOMA by meeting in numbers less than a quorum for the purpose of secret deliberation. Walking Quorum = prohibited sequential conferencing in numbers less than a quorum. The physical presence of a quorum in a single place at the same time is not always necessary for a violation...to occur. Op. Tex. Att y Gen. No. DM-095 (1992) at 4. Members of a governmental body may violate the Open Meetings Act even though they are not physically present in one place, for example by discussing public business of the governmental body over the telephone. Tex. Att y Gen. No. LO- 055 (1995) at 3-4. TEX. GOV T CODE 551.143 Slide 7

2011 TXOAG OPINION REGARDING WALKING QUORUM Op. Tex. Att y Gen. No. GA-0896 (2011) at 1-2, citing Op. Tex. Att y Gen. No. DM-095 (1992) and relevant case law Facts = Email disseminated among members of governing body in numbers less than a quorum TXOAG concluded that: Although TOMA applies to a verbal exchange of a quorum of the members of the body, the: (1) words need not be spoken in person; and (2) members need not be in the physical presence of each other to constitute a quorum. Electronic communication (including email) may constitute deliberation and a meeting under TOMA -- thereby requiring TOMA compliance. A determination of whether the members of the body violated TOMA involved an analysis of the respective states of mind of each member involved in an alleged violation -- this because the TOMA walking quorum statute ( 551.143) requires the violator to knowingly commit the violation. Risk exists for a walking quorum in view of the widespread use of electronic communication -- including email, texting, and social media. TEX. GOV T CODE 551.001, 551.143-.144 Slide 8

MEETING REQUIREMENTS PUBLIC PARTICIPATION A meeting that is open to the public under the Act is one that the public is entitled to attend. The Act does not give the public a right to speak at such meetings. Op. Tex. Att y Gen. No. JC-0169 (2000) at 1. As a courtesy, many local governments provide a public comment time for attendees to address the body. PUBLIC HEARINGS ARE DIFFERENT -- the public must be given a reasonable opportunity to speak at the hearing. Reasonable rules may be imposed regarding public comment and public hearings -- including fair limitations on the number of speakers and presentation length. Access for disabled persons is required under the federal Americans with Disabilities Act. Interpreters for the hearing impaired may be provided upon request, although not required by TOMA. TEX. GOV T CODE 551.001-.002 42 U.S.C. 12131-12165 Slide 9

MEETING REQUIREMENTS MEETING TYPES TOMA recognizes three types of meetings: (1) regular; (2) special (or called); and (3) emergency Meeting cannot begin until quorum present TOMA applies to committee meetings when committee: (1) contains one or more members of body; (2) meets to discuss public business; and (3) has ability to supervise/control business of body Workshop Meetings (no formal action taken) not defined by TOMA -- but TOMA still applies TOMA does not apply to quorum gathering at social function, convention, ceremonial event, or press conference -- so long as formal action not taken and discussion of public business only incidental TEX. GOV T CODE 551.001-.002, 551.141-.143 Slide 10

MEETING REQUIREMENTS -- AGENDA POSTING (TIME) TOMA requires date, hour, place, and subject of any meeting ( Agenda ) to be posted AT LEAST 72 HOURS IN ADVANCE EXCEPTION: Emergency meeting notice = (1) must define the emergency an imminent threat to public health/safety or reasonably unforeseeable situation must exist and be clearly identified in notice; (2) must be sent to the media by telephone, facsimile, or e-mail; and (3) public notice must be posted AT LEAST 2 HOURS IN ADVANCE EXCEPTION: Recessed Meeting = No posting required if meeting recessed until following business day a longer recess requires new posting TEX. GOV T CODE 551.041-.0411, 551.045-.047 Slide 11

MEETING REQUIREMENTS -- AGENDA POSTING (CONTENT) GENERAL RULE = Must be sufficient to apprise public of subject matter -- but not necessary to describe all consequences which may result Tex. Turnpike Auth. v. City of Fort Worth, 554 S.W.2d 675, 676 (Tex. 1977) (notice not required to state all consequences which may result) Friends of Canyon Lake, Inc. v. Guadalupe-Blanco River Auth., 96 S.W.3d 519, 531 (Tex. App. -- Austin 2002, no pet.) (notice sufficient if an inkling of meeting s substance appears) Notice must contain: (1) name of body; (2) type of meeting; (3) time, date and place of meeting; and (4) agenda topics sufficiently described TEX. GOV T CODE 551.041-.0411, 551.042, 551.045-.047 Slide 12

MEETING REQUIREMENTS -- AGENDA POSTING (LOCATION) GENERAL RULE = Notice must be posted in place readily accessible to public -- capable of being read at all times of day/night COMMON PRACTICE = Posting notice backwards on inside of exterior door of authorized building COUNTY POSTING = at place readily accessible to public at county courthouse + internet posting (if website exists) TEX. GOV T CODE 551.043, 551.048-.056 Slide 13

MEETING REQUIREMENTS -- OPEN SESSION RULES Meeting cannot begin until quorum present -- must begin in open session pursuant to proper agenda posting Final action/decision can occur only in open session held in compliance with TOMA. Secret ballots prohibited -- ACTUAL VOTE AT PUBLIC MEETING BY MEMBERS OF BODY REQUIRED BEST PRACTICE = Adopt rules for: (1) placing items on agenda; (2) order of agenda; (3) motions and voting; (4) tabling or postponing action; (5) input from governing body, staff, consultants, and public; (6) recording equipment used by public during meeting REQUIRED RECORD OF OPEN SESSION = minutes or recording (public records); minutes must be permanently preserved TEX. GOV T CODE 551.021-.023, 551.101-.102 Slide 14

MEETING REQUIREMENTS -- CLOSED SESSION RULES Notice of authorized closed session topic in agenda = BEST PRACTICE Move to closed session through pronouncement of TOMA statute/authorized topic to support closed session Weatherford v. City of San Marcos, 157 S.W.3d 473, 485 (Tex. App. -- Austin 2004, pet. denied) (TOMA does not prohibit opinions being expressed in closed session -- but ACTION must only occur in open session) REQUIRED RECORD = (1) certified agenda (describes subject matter, action taken, and announcement by presiding officer of date/time and beginning/end of session); or (2) recording Record must be (1) preserved at least 2 years -- and to completion of any suit filed regarding meeting, and (2) is EXPRESSLY CONFIDENTIAL Many authorized topics exist under TOMA -- including (1) personnel matters, (2) consultation with attorney, and deliberation regarding (3) real property, (4) gifts and donations, (5) contract negotiations, and (6) economic development negotiations No person may be admitted whose interest is ADVERSE -- exclusion extends to opposing suit parties and proposed seller of property to government TEX. GOV T CODE 551.071-.074, 551.087, 551.101-.104, 551.129 Slide 15

MEETING REQUIREMENTS -- RATIFICATION When governmental body fails to comply with TOMA it later may meet to RATIFY (or re-authorize) incorrect action through meeting conducted in full compliance with TOMA RETROACTIVE EFFECT NOT PERMISSIBLE -- Ratification effective only from date of proper ratification Ratification must be explicit and in strict TOMA compliance Slide 16

CIVIL ENFORCEMENT TEX. GOV T CODE 551.142 -- Interested person (including media) may sue TO STOP, PREVENT, OR REVERSE violation of TOMA through injunction, mandamus, or declaratory judgment action Court may assess costs and attorney s fees, dependent on whether: (1) action was brought in good faith, and (2) the Body s conduct had reasonable legal basis Body may be ordered to stop violation or perform duty required by statute. ALSO, COURT MAY (BUT IS NOT REQUIRED TO) VOID ACTION TAKEN IN VIOLATION OF TOMA TEX. GOV T CODE 551.146 -- Individual, corporation, or partnership can be held liable for damages if, without lawful authority, he/it KNOWINGLY DISCLOSES to public certified agenda/recording of meeting lawfully closed under TOMA DAMAGES = (1) actual damages -- including personal injuries, lost wages, defamation, or mental/emotional distress; (2) attorney s fees and court costs; and (3) exemplary damages DEFENSE = (1) good reason existed to believe disclosure was lawful; or (2) disclosure was result of mistake TEX. GOV T CODE 551.142, 551.146 Slide 17

CRIMINAL ENFORCEMENT TEX. GOV T CODE 551.143 -- Member of Body commits offense if he knowingly conspires to circumvent TOMA by meeting in numbers less than quorum for secret deliberations in violation of TOMA; PUNISHMENT = fine of not less than $100 or more than $500, jail confinement for not less than one month or more than six months, or both such fine and confinement TEX. GOV T CODE 551.144 -- Member of Body commits offense if closed meeting is not permitted under TOMA, and he knowingly: (1) calls/aids in calling or organizing closed meeting, whether special or called meeting; (2) closes or aids in closing meeting if a regular meeting; or (3) participates in closed meeting, whether regular, special, or called meeting; PUNISHMENT = fine of not less than $100 or more than $500, jail confinement for not less than one month or more than six months, or both such fine and confinement. TEX. GOV T CODE 551.145 -- Member of Body commits offense if he participates in closed meeting knowing that certified agenda is not being kept or recording is not being made. PUNISHMENT = fine of not more than $500. TEX. GOV T CODE 551.146 -- Individual, corporation, or partnership commits offense if, without lawful authority, he/it knowingly discloses to member of public certified agenda or recording of meeting lawfully closed to public under TOMA. PUNISHMENT = fine of not more than $2,000, jail confinement for not less than 180 days, or both such fine and confinement. TEX. GOV T CODE 551.143-.146 Slide 18

CONCLUDING REMARKS You work as a public servant -- you serve in challenging times. Being a public servant today is hard work. You should acknowledge the challenging environment and try hard each day to succeed at three seemingly simple but often difficult tasks in the performance of your official duties: BE RIGHT ON THE LAW; BE RIGHT ON THE ETHICS; AVOID EVEN THE APPEARANCE OF AN IMPROPRIETY. We wish you the best of success in your work as a public servant. Slide 19

TEXAS OPEN MEETINGS ACT: UPDATE 2017 NORTH AND EAST TEXAS COUNTY JUDGES AND COMMISSIONERS ASSOCIATION ANNUAL CONFERENCE MAY 17, 2017 BEAUMONT, TEXAS Charles R. Kimbrough and Joshua Katz Bickerstaff Heath Delgado Acosta LLP 3711 South MoPac Expressway Building One, Suite 300 Austin, Texas 78746 (512) 472-8021 (512) 320-5638 Facsimile www.bickerstaff.com Bickerstaff Heath Delgado Acosta LLP 2017 Slide 20