Jurisdiction INVOLUNTARY COMMITMENT PROCEEDINGS. Involuntary proceedings may be had:

Similar documents
MARCH 23, Referred to Committee on Judiciary

Referred to Committee on Health and Human Services. SUMMARY Revises provisions governing mental health. (BDR )

IN THE FAMILY DIVISION OF THE SECOND JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF WASHOE COUNTY

- 79th Session (2017) Assembly Bill No. 440 Assemblyman Yeager

45 STATES AND THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA PERMIT DIRECT PETITIONS TO A COURT FOR TREATMENT FOR A PERSON WITH A SEVERE MENTAL ILLNESS

IN THE MUNICIPAL COURT CUYAHOGA COUNTY, OHIO ) CASE NO. Defendant hereby ordered to have psychiatric evaluation with Dr. on at as follows (check one):

Information for Users of Mental Health Services

ECO/TDO/Civil Commitment

Civil Commitment. Understanding the Commitment Process in Brown County. 300 S. Adams, Green Bay, WI (920)

11/03/11 CHAPTER 122C - Article 5 - Part 7 Page 1

2.3 Involuntary Commitment: Prehearing Procedures

Chapter 3 Involuntary Commitment of Adults and Minors for Substance Abuse Treatment

NC General Statutes - Chapter 122C Article 5 1

Civil Mental Health Proceedings: Understanding the Process

IDAHO CODE TITLE 18 CHAPTER 2 MENTAL CONDITION OF A DEFENDANT

VIRGIN ISLANDS SUPREME COURT RULES (as amended November 2, 2011)

First Regular Session Seventy-second General Assembly STATE OF COLORADO INTRODUCED. Bill Summary

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE

IN THE SUPREME COURT, STATE OF WYOMING

RULES OF THE TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF INTELLECTUAL AND DEVELOPMENTAL DISABILITIES OFFICE OF GENERAL COUNSEL

"AN ACT RELATING TO THE COMMITMENT OF INSANITY ACQUITTEES; AND FOR OTHER PURPOSES." BE IT ENACTED BY THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF THE STATE OF ARKANSAS:

FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS REGARDING FILING APPEALS IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF GEORGIA

RULES GOVERNING THE COURTS OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY RULE 3:21. SENTENCE AND JUDGMENT; WITHDRAWAL OF PLEA; PRESENTENCE INVESTIGATION; PROBATION

208.4 Inquiry Panel Review. applicant has established that he or she possesses the character and fitness necessary to practice law in

IN THE COMMON PLEAS COURT, PREBLE COUNTY, OHIO ENTRY

Rules of Procedure TABLE OF CONTENTS

As Introduced. 132nd General Assembly Regular Session H. B. No

WEST VIRGINIA LEGISLATURE. House Bill 2657

Form DC-4001 PETITION FOR INVOLUNTARY Form DC-4001 ADMISSION FOR TREATMENT

CHAPTER Committee Substitute for Committee Substitute for Committee Substitute for House Bill No. 439

Probate Proceedings Why Can t They All Just Get Along?

CITY of ALBUQUERQUE SEVENTEENTH COUNCIL

MENTAL HEALTH ADVANCE DIRECTIVES - GUIDE FOR AGENTS

CHAPTER Committee Substitute for Committee Substitute for Senate Bill No. 522

ARTICLE 5.--ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURE ACT GENERAL PROVISIONS. K.S.A through shall be known and may be cited as the Kansas

MENTAL HEALTH ADVANCE DIRECTIVES

Laura s Law (AB 1421) A Functional Outline

c t MENTAL HEALTH ACT

A Bill Regular Session, 2017 SENATE BILL 42

IC Chapter 3. Adjudicative Proceedings

PREVENTION AND TREATMENT OF DRUG DEPENDENCY ACT 20 OF 1992

STATE OF MISSISSIPPI CRIME VICTIMS BILL OF RIGHTS REQUEST TO EXERCISE VICTIMS RIGHTS

HRS Examination of defendant with respect to physical or mental disease, disorder, or defect. (1) Whenever the defendant has filed a notice

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF IDAHO. Docket No ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Voluntary Admissions

CHAPTER 559 MENTAL DISEASES

PRINCE WILLIAM COUNTY

STATE STANDARDS FOR INITIATING INVOLUNTARY TREATMENT

STATE OF MISSISSIPPI CRIME VICTIMS BILL OF RIGHTS REQUEST TO EXERCISE VICTIMS RIGHTS

RULES OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE NOTICE

ALLEGHENY COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES

STATE STANDARDS FOR EMERGENCY EVALUATION

Constitutional review by district court of administrative decisions and orders. A. Scope of rule. This rule governs writs of certiorari to

RULES OF THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF LEBANON COUNTY ORPHANS COURT DIVISION CHAPTER 1. LOCAL RULES OF ORPHANS COURT DIVISION

STATE STANDARDS FOR INITIATING INVOLUNTARY TREATMENT

GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF NORTH CAROLINA 1989 SESSION CHAPTER 823 HOUSE BILL 992

LONDONDERRY POLICE DEPARTMENT POLICIES AND PROCEDURES

IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

TITLE 8. EMPLOYMENT CHAPTER 1. EMPLOYEE REVIEW CODE

RULES OF CIVIL APPELLATE PROCEDURE. Tribal Council Resolution

RULES AND STATUTES ON HABEAS CORPUS with Amendments and Additions in the ANTITERRORISM AND EFFECTIVE DEATH PENALTY ACT OF 1996

Chapter II BAY MILLS COURT OF APPEALS

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF ORANGE SELF-HELP CENTER LPS CONSERVATORSHIP REAPPOINTMENT PROCEDURE

Board of Certification, Inc. Version Effective September 1, 2016 Updated May 2016

NC General Statutes - Chapter 15A Article 56 1

18 USC 3006A. NB: This unofficial compilation of the U.S. Code is current as of Jan. 4, 2012 (see

Florida Senate CS for SB 522. By the Committee on Children, Families, and Elder Affairs; and Senators Grimsley and Detert

Case No. 763 GM

[SUBSECTIONS (a) AND (b) ARE UNCHANGED]

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF THE STATE OF IDAHO, IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF KOOTENAI

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF IDAHO. Docket No ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

COURT RULES OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE CHAPTER 12 TABLE OF CONTENTS

The Mental Health Services Act

LAWYERING FOR A LAWYER WITH A DISABILITY BEFORE THE STATE BAR OF TEXAS

COMMITMENT ISSUES FOR LAW ENFORCEMENT

M.R IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS. Effective January 1, 2013, Illinois Rule of Evidence 502 is adopted, as follows.

FRESNO COUNTY EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT ASSOCIATION (FCERA) ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDINGS AND APPEALS TO THE BOARD POLICY

SURROGATE S COURT OF NEW YORK BROOME COUNTY

CALIFORNIA JUVENILE COURT PROCESS FOR DELINQUENCY CASES

RULES OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS (Revised effective January 1, 2011)

CHAPTER 36. MEDICAID FRAUD PREVENTION SUBCHAPTER A. GENERAL PROVISIONS

SENATE APPRQPRLATIGSNS CQMMfTTEE FISCAL NOTE

Appendix D Involuntary Commitment and the Federal Gun Control Act

SOUTHWEST INTERTRIBAL COURT OF APPEALS RULES OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE

A. Waiver requirements. A juvenile who has attained the age of fourteen may only waive the right to counsel if:

PART I PELIMINARY PROVISIONS. PART II ADMINISTRA non

79th OREGON LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY Regular Session. Enrolled. Senate Bill 505

Navajo Children s Code Rules of Procedure

PART FAMILY LAW

ABCs of Seeking Judicial Review of a MassHealth Board of Hearings Decision

EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT FOR THE POSITION OF GENERAL MANAGER/CHIEF ENGINEER RECITALS OPERATIVE PROVISIONS

NC General Statutes - Chapter 35A Article 1 1

TRIBAL CODE CHAPTER 82: APPEALS

State of Kansas Board of Indigents Defense Services Permanent Administrative Regulations

NC General Statutes - Chapter 35A 1

NC General Statutes - Chapter 50 Article 2 1

IN THE THIRTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY, FLORIDA

Corrective Action/Fair Hearing Plan. For. The Medical Staff of Indiana University Blackford Hospital Hartford City, IN 47348

RULES GOVERNING THE COURTS OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY RULE 2:12. APPEALS ON CERTIFICATION TO THE SUPREME COURT

Adult Protective Services and Guardianship Relevant Statutes and Regulations

Transcription:

INVOLUNTARY COMMITMENT PROCEEDINGS Jurisdiction Involuntary proceedings may be had: OR In the district court of the county where the person to be treated resides In the district court of any other county of this state where such person is found Idaho Code 66-328 1

Involuntary commitment statute may not be used to detain or involuntarily commit: A voluntary patient, unless patient asks to be released ( 66-320(b)) A person having the following conditions: epilepsy, developmental disability, physical disability, intellectual disability, chronic alcoholism or drug abuse, aged UNLESS, in addition thereto, a mental illness exists ( 66-329(13)(a)) A person receiving spiritual treatment ( 66-329(13)(c)) A person who can be properly cared for privately with the help of willing and able family or friends UNLESS the person is mentally ill or presents a substantial risk of injury if allowed to remain at liberty ( 66-329(13)(b)) Juveniles See Title 16, Chapter 24, Children s Mental Health Act Idaho s civil commitment statute, Idaho Code 66-329, may be invoked to obtain involuntary commitment of a mentally ill individual who is in county [not state]custody. A magistrate assigned to handle commitment proceedings holds exclusive authority to render decisions in the commitment proceedings notwithstanding the patient is also a defendant in a criminal action. State v. Hargis, 126 Idaho 727, 732(Ct. App. 1995). 2

Administrative Hold Idaho Code 66-320 Negative DE Release Voluntary Patient pursuant to 66-3218 Patient asks to be released 66-320(a) Physician Hold for 3 Days for DE Exam and application for continued care 66-320(a) Positive DE Petition for Involuntary Detention 66-329(1) Police or Physician Hold Idaho Code 66-326 Negative DE TCO expires* Application upon custody / detention (24-hour hold) 66-326 Evidence in support of hold to judge within 24 hours of custody/detention If criteria is met, Temporary Custody Order DE Exam within 24 hours of TCO Report to court within 24 hours of exam Positive DE PA files Petition for Involuntary Detention 66-329(4) *An Order Fixing Costs will need to be requested from the Court 3

66-326 Standard The person is gravely disabled due to mental illness The person s continued liberty poses an imminent danger to that person or others as evidenced by a threat of substantial physical harm Field Application Idaho Code 66-329 Negative DE Dismissal Order* Motion for Dismissal Order* Application (filed by friend, spouse, relative, doctor, PA, nurse) along with DE report or statement that Patient refused 66-329(1) Court shall appoint 2d DE (within 48 hours )to report to Court within 72 hours 66-329(4) Positive DE Order of Detention 66-329(5) *Costs to be fixed as part of Order Hearing Right to Counsel 66-329(7) May be continued up to 14 Days 66-329(6) Pending hearing Court may authorize treatment 66-329(5) Order of Commitment and Fixing Costs* 4

66-329 Standard The proposed patient is: Mentally ill; Likely to injure self or others, or is gravely disabled due to mental illness; And the proposed patient lacks capacity to make informed decisions about treatment Opinion of Designated Examiner 66-326 Evidence (DE certificate) supporting the 24-hour hold to be presented to a judge within 24 hours of the person s custody/detention If the standard is met (positive DE), the court will issue a Temporary Custody Order to hold the person in a facility and to have another DE exam within 24 hours of the Order With another positive DE, a petition for Detention Order is filed seeking to hold the person in a facility awaiting hearing under 66-329 66-329 Evidence (DE certificate) or statement of patient s refusal to submit to an exam shall accompany the application for commitment Upon receipt of application, Court appoints another DE or two (2) DEs to report within 72 hours their findings as to the mental condition of proposed patient One DE to be a psychiatrist, licensed physician or licensed psychologist If the standard is met, court will issue an involuntary Detention Order to hold the person in a facility awaiting hearing 5

Resolution of involuntary proceedings Under 66-326, a Temporary Custody Order will expire (a) with the filing of a negative DE certificate or (b)if no petition for detention is timely filed in response to a positive DE certificate Under 66-329, the Court after the Order of Involuntary Detention must take one of the following actions: issue an abeyance order where patient becomes voluntary and agrees to comply with physician s directives enter an Order of Dismissal prior to hearing, if patient no longer meets criteria issue an order of commitment Holding proceedings in abeyance is defined at 66-317(16) as an alternative to judicial commitment based upon an agreement entered into by all parties, including the proposed patient, and agreed to by the court, providing suspension or inactivity the petition for involuntary commitment. 30-day abeyance If patient does not comply, a new DE report to allow state to allege criteria for commitment 6

Required findings/criteria for commitment The patient is mentally ill and likely to injure self or others, or is gravely disabled; or The patient lacks capacity to make informed decisions about treatment Involuntary commitment hearing Requires notice Within 7 days of receipt of DE certificates ( 66-329(6))for hearings based on 66-320 and 66-329 Within 5 days (including weekends and holidays) of court s issuing of detention order ( 66-326(4)) for hearing based on 66-326 May be continued for up to 14 days for good cause ( 66-329(7)) May be held other than at court ( 66-329(8)) 7

Upon an order of commitment, the court pursuant to Idaho Code 66-356(1)(a)shall make a finding whether the patient is a person to whom 18 U.S.C. 922(d)(4) and (g)(4) apply(firearms disability): Patient has been adjudicated as a mental defective or Patient has been committed to a mental institution Disclosure Disclosure of all certificates, applications, records and reports made for the purpose of this act identifying a patient is pursuant to chapter 1, title 74, Idaho Code Idaho Code 74-104, 74-105(7), 74-106(6) make records on involuntary proceedings exempt from disclosure Such records may be disclosed if necessary to carry out any of the provisions of this act or upon the court s direction 8

Fixing of costs in involuntary proceedings all costs associated with the commitment proceedings and not included in subsection (c) 66-327 Limited to pre-commitment costs 66-327(a) To be ordered by the Court after making the required findings of indigency and residency If the court determines such person is unable to pay all or any part of such costs, the court shall fix responsibility, in accordance with the provisions of chapter 35,, title 31, Idaho Code, for payment of such costs on the county of such person s residence to the extent not paid by such person or not covered by third party resources, including medical assistance as aforesaid. Idaho Code 66-327(a) 9

Indigency The court should consider the substantive provisions of chapter 35, title 31 what resources the person has, whether, considering the availability of resources, the person is medically indigent and so onwhen it fixes responsibility for costs. In Re Daniel W., 145 Idaho 677, 669 (2008). Residency [T]hose substantive portions of chapter 35, which are applicable and appropriate with regard to section 66-327, should be incorporated as they evolve from time to time. In Re Daniel W., 145 Idaho 677, 669 (2008). 10

Evidence regarding residency and indigency is to be found On the application for commitment In the DE certificates From testimony at the hearing; inquire of Patient How long have you lived at your current address? In an affidavit completed by the Patient at the facility N.B. The billed charges are generally not before the Court Order fixing costs on Patient if patient has resources to pay, including private insurance or VA benefits, or Medicaid N.B. Medicaid does not pay the DE N.B. Medicaid from another state does not pay 11

Order fixing costs on the county after an analysis of obligated county under Idaho Code 31-3506(2) Order fixing costs should recite the relevant dates of service Beware of inclusion of any days the patient may have been in the facility voluntarily Beware of inclusion of any voluntary days during an abeyance 12

Challenge to an Order Fixing Costs File a Motion to Reconsider I.R.C.P. 11.2(b) File an I.R.C.P. 60b Motion (Ada County) File a Stipulation and proposed Amended Order for Costs I.R.C.P. 2.3(b) requires the clerk of the court to serve a copy of the entered order to the attorney of record for each party. Idaho Code 66-327, unlike the Medical Indigencystatutes, does not provide for: billed amounts in excess of $11K to be sent to CAT reimbursement to a county payor. 13

JUDICIAL REVIEW OF MEDICAL INDIGENCY BOARD DECISION Authority for Judicial Review Applicant or third party applicant may seek judicial review of a final determination of the county commissioners denying an application Idaho Code 31-3505G Applicant may seek judicial review of the final determination as to reimbursement amount or rate Idaho Code 31-3510A(8) 14

In the manner provided in section 31-1506, Idaho Code [J]udicial review of any order or proceeding by the board shall be initiated by any person aggrieved thereby within the same time and same manner as provided in chapter 52, title 67, Idaho Code [the Idaho Administrative Procedure Act]. Venue is in the district court of the county governed by the board Idaho Code 31-1506(2) Time for filing petition for judicial review is 28 days from the final agency action Idaho Code 67-5273(3) Idaho Rule of Civil Procedure 84(b)(A) 15

I.R.C.P. 84 This Rule addresses judicial review of the actions of a local government, when judicial review is authorized by statute. See definitions: Action means order or decision of an agency Agency means any nonjudicial board Petitioner seeks judicial review Respondent is the County that will respond to Petitioner s request Precursor to judicial review Final order of the Board of Commissioners and If there is a contested resource availability issue, petitioner is directed to request a prelitigation review (which is only advisory) Idaho Code 31-3151 and 31-3152 REMINDER: Resources under 31-3502(25) starting on the date necessary medical services were first provided 16

With a request to the prelitigation panel, the applicable statute of limitations shall be tolled During the time the claims is pending before the panel AND For thirty (30) days thereafter Idaho Code 31-3554 Process Petition for judicial review is to be filed in the district court With prelit, the petitioner may file the petition for judicial review and ask the court for a stay pending determination by the prelitigation panel I.R.C.P. 84(m) OR The petitioner may submit the request to prelit, wait for the determination, then file the petition for judicial review with the court 31-3551 17

Petitioner must serve copies of the notice of petition for judicial review upon the Board (not the County Indigent Office and not the Prosecutor) I.R.C.P. 84(d) Record and transcript to be lodged with the court within 14 days of filing of petition Indigent Services prepares the record of all documents in the application file (counsel should review) Commissioners Office prepares the transcript of the hearing(s); requires certification (I.R.C.P. 84(g)(D)) Petitioner pays estimated fee(s) at time of filing petition, with balance due at time of lodging of record and transcript Fee set by county ordinance or resolution (I.R.C.P. 84(f)(2)(A)) 18

Board must mail or deliver notice of lodging of transcript and record to attorney(s) of record Advising record and transcript available from Board Requesting balance of fees Advising time for filing any objections to the record or transcript I.R.C.P. 84(j) Board must settle record and transcript filed with court within 42 days of service of petition I.R.C.P. 84(k) There is an opportunity to request augmentation of the record The parties may stipulate and request an order from the court remanding to the Board (this is sometimes done before any briefing, in an attempt to obtain additional evidence to resolve the appeal and save costs) I.R.C.P. 84(l) 19

Briefing is required: Petitioner s brief due within 35 days of filing record and transcript Respondent s (County s) brief due within 28 days of service of Petitioner s brief Petitioner s Reply brief due within 21 days of service of Respondent s brief Notice of Oral Argument within 14 days after final brief filed Failure to timely file a petition for judicial review is jurisdictional and will cause automatic dismissal of the petition for judicial review Failure of a party to timely take any other step in the process will not be jurisdiction, but may be grounds for other action or sanction I.R.C. P. 84(n) 20

Scope of Review Judicial review shall be conducted by the court without a jury. Judicial review of disputed issues of fact must be confined to the agency (board) record for judicial review as defined in this chapter. Idaho Code 67-5277 Standard of Review In reviewing the board s decision, the court may not substitute its judgment for that of the board on questions of fact, and it will uphold the board s findings if supported by substantial and competent evidence. Shobe v. Ada County Bd. of County Comm rs, 130 Idaho 580 (1997). See also Idaho Code 67-5279. 21

To determine whether there is substantial evidence supporting the Board s findings, the Court must review the whole record, including evidence contrary to the Board s decision. Local 1494 of Intn l Assoc. of Firefighters v. City of Coeur d Alene, 99 Idaho 630 (1978). A reviewing court may not vacate a board s decision unless the substantial rights of the appellant have been prejudiced. Idaho Code 67-5279(4); University of Utah Hospital v. Ada County Bd. of Comm rs, 143 Idaho 808 (2007). 22

Court may remand, for example, if it determines additional findings by the board are required (reviewing court is not the fact finder and cannot make findings) I.R.C.P. 84(l) Decision by the district court becomes final 42 days after the date file stamped by the clerk of the district court, unless a notice of appeal is filed to the Supreme Court. I.R.C.P. 84(t)(2) THE END 23