Polish-Ukrainian Historical Disputes over the Volhynian Massacres

Similar documents
Grzegorz Hryciuk: Genocide in Arcadia Ethnic Cleansing in Volhynia and Eastern Galicia in

Working Paper #9. To Resolve the Ukrainian Question Once and For All : The Ethnic Cleansing of Ukrainians in Poland,

The Immigration Debate: Historical and Current Issues of Immigration 2003, Constitutional Rights Foundation

Obtaining Information About Totalitarian States in Europe

Obtaining Information About Totalitarian States in Europe

Russia in Revolution. Overview. Serfdom in Czarist Russia 6/1/2010. Chapter 28

The Falange Espanola: Spanish Fascism

A Brief History of the Spanish Civil War

In Search of National Unity or International Separation

Unit 9: World War II: The Crisis Deepens

Chapter 7: Rejecting Liberalism. Understandings of Communism

History of the Baltic States: From Independence to Independence the 20 th century Part II

Conflating Terrorism and Insurgency

Georgia High School Graduation Test Tutorial. World History from World War I to World War II

Tuesday, 29th July 2014 Address in Berlin on the anniversary of the Warsaw Uprising

In the Aftermath of World War I, Nations Were Forever Changed

Roots of Appeasement Adolf Hitler Treaty of Versailles reparation Luftwaffe Kreigesmarine Wehrmacht Lebensraum

The Nazi-Soviet Pact and Eastern Europe

Social Studies: World History Pacing Guide Quarter 4

AP European History Chapter 29: Dictatorships and the Second World War

Social Studies: World History Pacing Guide Quarter 4

THE INSURGENT MOVEMENT IN UKRAINE DURING 1940s-1950s LESSONS LEARNED FROM THE CASE STUDY OF THE UKRAINIAN INSURGENT ARMY (OUN-UPA)

Uncovering Truth: Promoting Human Rights in Brazil

The Balkans: Powder Keg of Europe. by Oksana Drozdova, M.A. Lecture VI

Chapter 14 Section 1. Revolutions in Russia

Conventional Deterrence: An Interview with John J. Mearsheimer

Chapter 17 Lesson 1: Two Superpowers Face Off. Essential Question: Why did tension between the U.S. and the U.S.S.R increase after WWII?

World War I. The Great War, The War to End All Wars

Why did revolution occur in Russia in March 1917? Why did Lenin and the Bolsheviks launch the November revolution?

THE MARTENS CLAUSE AND INTERNATIONAL CRIMES IN ESTONIA

LESSON 1: YALTA, 1945 Student Handout 2: Soviet View

Vietnam, Cambodia, Laos Annotation

Art. 61. Troops that give no quarter have no right to kill enemies already disabled on the ground, or prisoners captured by other troops.

Nations in Upheaval: Europe

The 2nd Sino-Japanese War. March 10, 2015

Dublin City Schools Social Studies Graded Course of Study Modern World History

Ascent of the Dictators. Mussolini s Rise to Power

Photo Gallery. Volhynia Massacre. (photo No. 2) A photo from an investigation conducted by the IPN branch in Lublin regarding Volhynia

UNIT 6 THE RUSSIAN REVOLUTION

Living in our Globalized World: Notes 18 Antisystemic protest Copyright Bruce Owen 2009 Robbins: most protest is ultimately against the capitalist

Standard Standard

EDUCATIONAL ACTIVITIES SESSION SCENARIO. Class: Władysław Anders. The General of Polish Hopes

The Atomic Bomb. Document # In your own words, what is the argument? (Summarize the document)

Ideological Alternatives: Soviet Union and Germany. Inter War World: The Great Depression

World History II Final Exam Study Guide. Mr. Rarrick. Name:

REMAPPING UKRAINE 15 th Century BCE to 21 st Century CE. Osher Lifelong Learning Institute Vanderbilt University Winter Term 2015 Mary Pat Silveira

Revolution and Nationalism

Jasenovac: The Unknown Camp of Croatia

LESSON 1: YALTA, 1945 Student Handout 1: Problems

Unit 3.1 Appeasement and World War II

WORLD WAR II Chapter 30.2

The Cold War Begins. After WWII

Chapter 14 Revolution and Nationalism. Section 1 Revolutions In Russia

The Origins of Cold War. Chapter 26 Section 1

Varieties of Organized Violence

"Syrian Gov t Air Strikes Rock Al-Muzeireeb Town in Southern Syria"

THE COMING OF WORLD WAR II

The Industrialization of the United States CONSEQUENCES s 1910 s

A Level History. Independent Summer Learning Introductory Assignment

Rise of the Totalitarian Rulers

History of the Baltic States: From Independence to Independence the 20 th century Part I

Cold War Conflicts Chapter 26

The Rise of Fascism and Communism. For the first time, war was waged on a global scale, leading to casualties and destruction on a

Chapter 12 Section 3 Indian Nationalism Grows. Essential Question: How did Gandhi and the Congress party work for independence in India?

Abstract. "The Use of Guerrilla Forces for the Intelligence Purposes of the Soviet. Partisan Movement, "

Raminta Daukšaitė, presentation at Universidad de Sevilla 26 of March, 2015

The Revolutions of 1848

International History Declassified

Origins of the Cold War,

Experiences in Coming to America By Leon Boonin. Boonin Family Papers collection [#3186]. Historical Society of Pennsylvania.

AMERICA AND THE WORLD. Chapter 13 Section 1 US History

The Chinese Civil War

Welcome, WHAP Comrades!

Y SUMMAR SI_25_2014.indb :21

D-Day Gives the Allies a Foothold in Europe

The R.O.C. at the End of WWII

BOOK SUMMARY. Rivalry and Revenge. The Politics of Violence during Civil War. Laia Balcells Duke University

The rise of right-wing extremism in Europe

World War II. Benito Mussolini Adolf Hitler Fascism Nazi. Joseph Stalin Axis Powers Appeasement Blitzkrieg

RADIO FREE EUROPE/RADIO LIBERTY, PRAGUE, CZECH REPUBLIC

The Resistance fight inside of camps and prisons the example CC Buchenwald

Chapters 30 and 31: The Interwar Period ( )

Name Date Period Class Parliamentary Elections of Germany

Russian Civil War

Allied vs Axis. Allies Great Britain France USSR US (1941) Axis Germany Japan Italy

World War I. The Great War, The War to End All Wars

Dictators Threaten The World

Lead up to World War II

Title. Author(s)TOMASZEWSKI, Jerzy. CitationActa Slavica Iaponica, 9: Issue Date Doc URL. Type. File Information.

Revolution, Rebuilding, and New Challenges: 1985 to the Present

Dictators Threaten World Peace

BACKGROUND: why did the USA and USSR start to mistrust each other? What was the Soviet View? What was the Western view? What is a Cold War?

Chapter 8: The Use of Force

Contact for further information about this collection

"The Little Third Reich on Lake Superior: A History of Canadian Internment Camp R (Book Review)" by Ernest Robert Zimmerman

General Overview of Communism & the Russian Revolution. AP World History Chapter 27b The Rise and Fall of World Communism (1917 Present)

Fascism is Alive and Well in Spain The Case of Judge Garzon

A Nation Forged in Blood Part Two? Canada and World War Two

Resolved: United Nations peacekeepers should have the power to engage in offensive operations.

LESSON OBJECTIVE. 2.) EXPLAIN how Japan s long history of militarism & nationalism led to the vicious invasion & occupation of Nanking

Transcription:

Volhynia Massacre Źródło: http://www.volhyniamassacre.eu/zw2/controversies/183,polish-ukrainian-historical-disputes-over-the-volhynian- Massacres.html Wygenerowano: Sunday, 11 February 2018, 10:44 Polish-Ukrainian Historical Disputes over the Volhynian Massacres The anti-polish drive of the pro-bandera Ukrainian underground during World War II, together with the subsequent Polish retaliation it largely spawned, undoubtedly mark the bloodiest period of the Polish-Ukrainian conflict in the 1940s. This conflict raged in territories which were within Poland s interwar borders (basically, the country s south-east), and which, taken as a whole, had nearly co-equal Polish and Ukrainian populations. We use the word conflict because there was obvious antagonism between Poles and Ukrainians, and they waged a fight for land even though they had been citizens of the same state (the Second Republic of Poland, 1918-1939). Conflict is thus one of the terms used to describe what happened between Poles and Ukrainians during World War II. The perpetrators Bandera s Organization of Ukrainian Nationalists (OUN-B) and its military wing, that is, the Ukrainian Insurgent Army (UPA) used the codename anti-polish operation in their documents in to refer to the planned extermination of the Poles. Bandera s followers carried this aim out during 1943 1945 on the disputed territories of Volhynia, Eastern Galicia, and the south-eastern Lublin region (centered on Chełm), which they regarded as indigenously Ukrainian. The present-day state of the Polish-Ukrainian historical debate on the topic is therefore but one proof of how complex the matter is. The endless publicist discussion, which is often accompanied by negative emotions, continues to heat up the historical debate. Thus, the echoes of those tragic events continue to have a significant influence on political decisions in Poland and Ukraine with regard to commemoration of the victims for indeed, they have become an element of the Polish-Ukrainian conflict of memory. Differences in Historical Discourse The main difference between the approach of Polish and Ukrainian historians is in the terminology which they use to describe and evaluate the conflict. As mentioned earlier, some Ukrainian historians tend to treat those events, which the perpetrators themselves called an anti-polish operation, as a stage in the second Polish-Ukrainian war of 1942 1947. The supporters of this thesis regard the massacres of 1943-45 as a continuation of the Polish-Ukrainian War of 1918 1919 for control over Lvov and Eastern Galicia, which ended in Ukrainian defeat. Nevertheless, more moderate Ukrainian researchers use the term Volhynian tragedy. The complex issues connected with the genesis and course of the anti-polish operation in Volhynia have recently reentered Polish-Ukrainian historical debate. Some have even ventured to return to the theories that the anti-polish attacks conducted by the OUN-B and the UPA were Soviet-inspired. The earlier events in the Chełm region (from the spring of 1942 until the subsequent winter) occupy an important place in the new approach of some Ukrainian historians. Those events were mostly connected with the German colonization operation launched in late 1942 in the Zamość region (Aktion in Zamosc), which some local Ukrainians were drawn into.

According to some Ukrainian historians the Volhynian massacres were not the beginning of a Polish-Ukrainian war, but rather its second (if not subsequent) stage. Moreover, the first wave of massacres of Volhynian Poles (until the spring of 1943) was a peasant war, a popular revolt (a Jacquerie ) something spontaneous and not inspired or controlled by Bandera s OUN. This revolt was purportedly initiated by the masses of Ukrainian refugees from the Chełm region to the west, who had fled across the Bug River and arrived in Volhynia as early as the winter of 1942-43. Once in Volhynia they inflamed the anti-polish sentiments among Ukrainian peasants with their stories about the atrocities Poles had supposedly committed against Ukrainians in the Chełm region. The number of civilian victims on both sides of the peasant war, which purportedly broke out in Volhynia in early 1943, was allegedly comparable. At the same time, some question the very existence of the documents of the pro-bandera underground proving that the anti-polish operations had a planned, organized, and mass character not only in Volhynia and not only in the first half of 1943. For instance, the climax of the anti-polish operation in the Chełm region in the spring of 1944 is regarded solely as the necessary defense of the local Ukrainians against the terror that the Polish underground had used non-stop since the spring of 1942. In this way some Ukrainian historians promote the pro-bandera theses that the suffering of Ukrainians from the Chełm region predated the suffering of Poles in Volhynia. After the war these theses dating back to the final period of World War II were successfully developed by emigrant Ukrainian historians associated with the OUN-B. Most Polish researchers continue to refer to the events in Volhynia, Eastern Galicia, and in the Chełm region as genocidal ethnic cleansings, the Volhynian (or Volhynian-Galician) slaughter, or, using legal terminology, they simply call them genocide. Some scholars, however, tend to use the controversial term of genocidium atrox (atrocious genocide), as they regard the Bandera followers crimes as more ghastly than the Nazi or Stalinist genocides. The Genesis of the Anti-Polish Operation of the OUN-B and the UPA All governments of the Second Republic of Poland made mistakes in their policy toward the Ukrainian minority, especially on the eve of the war (e.g., the Polonization operation in the Chełm Region and in Volhynia). It seems, however, that the anti-polish operation was a direct result of the OUN s ideology of integral nationalism (until 1939) and its radical faction s fascination with fascism (at least until 1942/1943). The ethnic policies of the Soviets and Germans (1939 1942) on the occupied south-eastern territories of the Second Republic of Poland were surely another factor. The former conducted deportations during 1940 1941, while the latter systematically exterminated the Jewish population, with help from some Ukrainians, beginning with the summer of 1941. In consequence, the Banderites concluded that they could follow the example of the two totalitarian powers to successfully solve the ethnic problems standing in the way of the establishment of a radically nationalist Ukrainian state. At the end of the war and in its immediate aftermath, however, the OUN-B was anxious to cover up the traces of the massacres and to democratize the organization through a new political platform the Ukrainian Supreme Liberation Council. Most probably the aim of the Council was to avoid embarrassment in the eyes of the West, which as early as 1943 was recognized as a potential ally in the struggle against the USSR for the establishment of an independent Ukrainian state on all ethnically Ukrainian territories.

The Essence of the Anti-Polish Operation Regardless of the differences in their approach to this topic, Polish historians agree that the anti-polish operation had nothing to do with the Polish-Ukrainian war, as the operation s main aim was to exterminate all Poles regardless of sex or age in certain disputed territories (e.g., in Volhynia from early 1943 until 1943/1944). In its milder variants (in Eastern Galicia and the Chełm region from the summer of 1943 until the spring of 1945) the aim was to exterminate only some Poles (mostly men) and to expel the rest from the territories the OUN-B deemed integral parts of the future Ukrainian state. However, according to Ukrainian sources there were many exceptions to that rule. The military confrontation between the UPA on the one hand, and the Polish underground (the Home Army [Armia Krajowa, AK] and Peasant Battalions [Bataliony Chłopskie, BCh]) on the other, was no war either. Only the intensive fighting in the Chełm region lasting from March/April 1944 until June/July 1944 had the features of a guerilla war. On the other territories where the Polish-Ukrainian conflict went on during the German occupation the Polish underground was too weak to defend Poles against Ukrainian attacks, let alone to engage in regular warfare against pro-bandera partisan units all the mnore so, as most troops (e.g., the 27 Volhynian Infantry Division of the Home Army) were assigned to carry out Operation Tempest against Germany. Time Frame According to Polish historians, the anti-polish operation began with the first mass slaughter conducted on February 9, 1943 by the UPA company commanded by Hryhorij Perehiniak Dovbeshko-Korobko in the Parośla rural colony in Volhynia (at least 155 Polish victims). In turn, the events of May 18, 1945 in the villages of Radków, Łachowce, Rzeplin, and Borodyca and their vicinity in the Chełm region are regarded as the epilogue of the operation. On that day the Vovky UPA company massacred several dozen Polish civilians. It is important that the said events took place on the eve of the truce between OUN-B and UPA and the post-home Army underground in the Chełm region. Polish Retaliation The issue of the genesis and evaluation of the Polish underground s retaliation are rather controversial, particularly in Polish academic milieu. Most victims of the retaliatory operations conducted during 1943 1945 were Ukrainian civilians. But Polish historians agree that the often bloody Polish retaliation cannot be equated with the planned extermination operation led by OUN-B and devised by its leadership. The retaliation of the Polish underground and Polish self-defense were usually motivated by the necessity to protect Poles against Ukrainian attacks. At times the retaliation was simply an act of merciless revenge. As the events escalated, the retaliatory attacks were conducted by order of the High Command of the Home Army [Komenda Główna AK]. Polish troops were to conduct broader terrorist operations (as the retaliation operations were called in Home Army documents), using the principle of collective responsibility toward the enemy population (e.g., in the early spring of 1944 in the Chełm region). But the main differences between the Polish retaliatory attacks and the anti-polish operation conducted by the OUN-B and the UPA

were their intentions and the incomparably smaller scale of the former operations. Unfortunately, sober, fact-based discussion is hampered by some Polish participants of those events and by conservative, nationalist milieux who try to belittle Ukrainian suffering or to justify the violence by deeming it a higher necessity. For instance, the Ukrainian peasants killed at the end of the German occupation by the Home Army and the Peasant Battalions in Sahryń are usually referred to as chance victims of stray bullets. Similar efforts are made with regard to the anti-ukrainian violence inflicted by the Polish nationalist partisan units (National Armed Forces [Narodowe Siły Zbrojne, NSZ]) in the eastern Lublin Region after July 1944. In their search for conspiracy theories some try to take the blame off the National Armed Forces for its crimes against Ukrainians (e.g., the case of Wierzchowiny), claiming that they were inspired or conducted by Soviets or by Polish communists. Number of Victims (1943 1945) According to conservative Polish estimates, the anti-polish operation conducted by the OUN-B and UPA resulted in a total of 80,000 100,000 victims (from early 1943 to mid-1945): 40,000 60,000 in Volhynia, 30,000 40,000 in Eastern Galicia, at least 4,000 in present-day Polish territory, including up to 2,000 in the Chełm region. The number of Ukrainian victims of the Polish retaliation during that period is estimated at 9,000 13,000 (ca. 2,000 3,000 in Volhynia, 1,000 2,000 in Eastern Galicia, and 6,000 7,000 in the present-day Polish territory, including 2,500 in the Chełm region). According to Ukrainian historians, approx. 17,000 24,000 Ukrainians died at the hands of Poles from late 1942 until early 1945 (10,000 12,000 in Volhynia, Polesie, and in the vicinity of Beresteczko, 3,000 5,000 in Eastern Galicia, 4,000 7,000 in the Chełm region, including up to 4,000 in the Hrubieszów county). Ukrainian historians estimate the Polish losses, in turn, at 40,000 60,000, including 23,000 40,000 in Volhynia, and 15,000 20,000 in the Eastern Galicia. Ukrainian estimates do not include Poles killed in the Chełm region. Mariusz Zajączkowski Photo gallery

Photo Gallery