This document is downloaded from DR-NTU, Nanyang Technological University Library, Singapore.

Similar documents
This document is downloaded from DR-NTU, Nanyang Technological University Library, Singapore.

This document is downloaded from DR-NTU, Nanyang Technological University Library, Singapore.

This document is downloaded from DR-NTU, Nanyang Technological University Library, Singapore.

4/25/2014. Population: 253 million (World Population Review) Number of Voters: million (The Guardian)

CRS Report for Congress

This document is downloaded from DR-NTU, Nanyang Technological University Library, Singapore.

RESULTS FROM WAVE XIV OF TRACKING SURVEYS. 1 July 2004

Philips Vermonte CSIS December The 2014 Election and Democracy in Indonesia

RESULTS FROM WAVE XI - XII OF TRACKING SURVEYS

Combating Corruption in Yudhoyono s Indonesia: An Insider s Perspective1

RESULTS FROM WAVES I THROUGH IV OF TRACKING SURVEY. IFES 1 March 2004

RESULTS FROM WAVE XV OF TRACKING SURVEYS. 4 August 2004

Syahrul Hidayat Democratisation & new voter mobilisation in Southeast Asia: moderation and the stagnation of the PKS in the 2009 legislative election

Presidentialism and Political Parties in Indonesia: Why Are All Parties Not Presidentialized?

personalities, parties, and voters

Indonesia. Alex Newsham

This document is downloaded from DR-NTU, Nanyang Technological University Library, Singapore.

This document is downloaded from DR-NTU, Nanyang Technological University Library, Singapore.

A 2014 Indonesian Election Primer. Nathan Allen

Indonesia - Political Risk Outlook

The Impact of an Open-party List System on Incumbency Turnover and Political Representativeness in Indonesia

Indonesia Briefing. Jakarta/Brussels, 21 May 2001 INDONESIA S PRESIDENTIAL CRISIS: THE SECOND ROUND I. INTRODUCTION

This document is downloaded from DR-NTU, Nanyang Technological University Library, Singapore.

CDI Policy Papers on Political Governance

NATIONAL PUBLIC OPINION SURVEY. Republic of Indonesia. August 2003

Indonesia s Political Outlook: Towards GE2014. Some Trends and Observations

Old Politics Rises to Challenge New Politics in Jakarta

Trump &Modi: Seeking a Global Partnership?

RESULTS FROM WAVE XVIII OF TRACKING SURVEYS. 19 October 2004

EUROPEAN UNION ELECTION OBSERVATION MISSION TO INDONESIA Final Report

This document is downloaded from DR-NTU, Nanyang Technological University Library, Singapore.

Public Opinion in Indonesia. Post-Presidential Election Public Opinion Survey October 2014

Why 100% of the Polls Were Wrong

This document is downloaded from DR-NTU, Nanyang Technological University Library, Singapore.

Andreas Ufen Democratisation & new voter mobilisation in Southeast Asia: forms of campaigning and the transformation of political parties in Indonesia

ASIA PROGRAM SPECIAL REPORT. A Billion Ballots for Democracy: Election Year in Indonesia. Introduction Amy McCreedy

Stan Greenberg and James Carville, Democracy Corps Erica Seifert and Scott Tiell, Greenberg Quinlan Rosner

Rural America Competitive Bush Problems and Economic Stress Put Rural America in play in 2008

Constitutional amendments in Turkey: Predictions and implications

Indonesia Seven Years after Soeharto: Party System Institutionalization in a New Democracy

The Budget Battle in the Republican-Obama Battleground

REPORTING AND PUBLIC DISCLOSURE OF FINANCIAL ACTIVITY OF POLITICAL PARTIES AND ELECTORAL PARTICIPANTS

Oral History Program Series: Governance Traps Interview no.: C2

RESULTS FROM WAVE XVI OF TRACKING SURVEYS. 25 August 2004

ASSESSMENT REPORT. Moroccan Parliamentary Elections: Political Parties Jockey for Power

Chapter 16 Section 1 Notes: The Eisenhower Era

Candidates, Coalitions and Prospects for the 2017 Jakarta Gubernatorial Election

Indonesia s third democratic transition: are the parties ready for the 2014 presidential election?

CHANGE IN GOVERNMENT IN THE WORLD S LARGEST MUSLIM COUNTRY

Centre for Democratic Institutions. Monitoring the Indonesian Elections. Jakarta 3-9 June 1999

CARTEL PARTY: AN ANALYSIS STUDY

INDONESIA S PRESIDENTIALISM: MODERATING STRONG PRESIDENTS, ENHANCING REPRESENTATION

The Centre for European and Asian Studies

Decentralisation Policy in Indonesia After 2001

The California Primary and Redistricting

AN OVERVIEW OF THE CAMPAIGN AND A REASONED GUESS

ASSESSMENT REPORT. Does Erdogan s Victory Herald the Start of a New Era for Turkey?

Elections and Obama's Foreign Policy

INDONESIA Briefing THE MEGAWATI PRESIDENCY. Jakarta/Brussels, 10 September 2001 OVERVIEW

Center for Southeast Asian Studies, Kyoto University

Hopes and doubts. Perspectives on the long road to Indonesia s economic development. Sponsored by Shell

Framing Megawati: a framing analysis of Megawati Sukarnoputri in the Western news media,

Singapore 27 Feb 2014

How Should Members of Parliament (and Presidents) Be Elected? E. Maskin Institute for Advanced Study

A Betrayal in Waiting? Plaid Cymru, the SNP and the Scottish Referendum

EGYPT AFTER THE SECOND WAVE OF PROTESTS

#34. Singapore 3 July Golkar Splits: But Who Will Emerge the Winner? By Leo Suryadinata*

BRIEFING PAPER New Se r i e s No. 28 December

Minnesota State Politics: Battles Over Constitution and State House

Chapter 5: Political Parties Section 1

The Fundamental Changes that Nobody Noticed. The MPR Annual Session, November A brief commentary

Reading the local runes:

The Battle for Bihar. Ronojoy Sen 1

The 2014 elections to the European Parliament: towards truly European elections?

This document is downloaded from DR-NTU, Nanyang Technological University Library, Singapore.

The unheard winning and bold economic agenda Findings from the Roosevelt Institute s Election night survey

Asian Democracy Index 2014: Dynamics in Civic Participation and the Continuing Economic Inequality in Indonesia

What is the Best Election Method?

The Rise and Fall of the Federalist Party. The Federalist Party was one of the first political parties in the United States.

US Watch. The 2018 Midterms Three scenarios. Group Economics Financial Markets Research. Insights.abnamro.nl/en. 28 September 2018

Macron wins French presidency, to sighs of relief in Europe

As fickle as the recent moves of Yushchenko and his party may look, they highlight Our Ukraine's deep-seated motivations.

Why The National Popular Vote Bill Is Not A Good Choice

PS 8(b) Dr Philips. Indonesia

DEMOCRATIC TRANSITION THEORY AND CIVIL-MILITARY CONFLICT: A CASE STUDY OF INDONESIA AND EGYPT

Another successful Spitzenkandidat?

Policy Paper. Combating Corruption in Yudhoyono s Indonesia: An Insider s Perspective. Professor Denny Indrayana CILIS POLICY PAPER

Newark

Election 2015: Liberals edge Conservatives as volatile electorate mulls final choice before last campaign weekend

Singapore 1 Nov 2012.

Indonesia in Transition

Introduction What are political parties, and how do they function in our two-party system? Encourage good behavior among members

Chris Radley Mark Pack

From Minority Vote to Majority Challenge. How closing the ethnic gap would deliver a Conservative majority

Behind Kerry s New Hampshire Win: Broad Base, Moderate Image, Electability

Lord Ashcroft Polls EU Referendum Poll May 2016

Amy Tenhouse. Incumbency Surge: Examining the 1996 Margin of Victory for U.S. House Incumbents

Slovakia: Record holder in the lowest turnout

Part I. Security Issues of East Asia

Revolt against Congress: Game On Survey of the Battleground House Districts

Transcription:

This document is downloaded from DR-NTU, Nanyang Technological University Library, Singapore. Title Paradox of Indonesia's "Post-Majapahit" presidency : historic direct election makes Yudhoyono most popular leader with possibly the weakest government since Suharto's fall. Author(s) Yang Razali Kassim Citation Yang Razali Kassim. (2004). Paradox of Indonesia's "Post-Majapahit" presidency : historic direct election makes Yudhoyono most popular leader with possibly the weakest government since Suharto's fall. (RSIS Commentaries, No. 026). RSIS Commentaries. Singapore: Nanyang Technological University. Date 2004 URL http://hdl.handle.net/10220/4052 Rights Nanyang Technological University

ATTENTION: The Singapore Copyright Act applies to the use of this document. Nanyang Technological University Library IDSS COMMENTARIES (26/2004) IDSS Commentaries are intended to provide timely and, where appropriate, policy relevant background and analysis of contemporary developments. The views of the authors are their own and do not represent the official position of IDSS. The Paradox of Indonesia s Post-Majapahit Presidency: Historic Direct Election Makes Yudhoyono Most Popular Leader with possibly the Weakest Government since Suharto s fall Yang Razali Kassim * 12 th July 2004 Goenawan Mohamad, the veteran writer, describes the July 5 direct presidential election as a historic turning point ushering Indonesia into the post-majapahit era. Never before since the time of the old Javanese kingdom have the people had the freedom to choose their own ruler. This is also the first time since the birth of the Indonesian nation state that they can elect their own king - without intermediaries or people s representatives acting on their behalf. Susilo Bambang Yudhoyono, as widely predicted by various polls, is emerging as the most popular choice, with Yusuf Kalla as his vice-president. The emergence of Susilo SBY as he is widely known at the expense of incumbent Megawati Sukarnoputri is the consequence of a deficiency fatigue : Tired of weak government, the people clamoured for change and rejuvenation and swung behind the candidate who to them came like a gush of fresh air. The result a significant lead of 33.8% of the votes counted so far for SBY, cutting across ideological, ethnic and religious affiliations, according to an exit poll released two days after the election by the local research body, LP3ES, and the United States-based National Democratic Institute (NDI). Some supporters might be tempted to cast SBY s rise from this revolt of the masses in the mould of the messianic Satrio Piningit the long-awaited Javanese hero-warrior. But is he indeed the saviour who will lead Indonesians out of their miseries and into the golden age of abundance and harmony? Or is his current popularity just a passing fancy, that will soon fizzle out in the tortuous course of Indonesia s political transition, post-suharto? Until the final tally is counted and officially confirmed by the end of the month, it is premature to write off Megawati, who is trailing not too far behind in second place with 26%, or for that matter, retired General Wiranto, who follows closely in third place with 22%. In short, it is still a bit early to declare SBY as president. Although he has taken a big lead in the current phase of the two-part presidential election, there is still one more round to go, given that he is unlikely to meet the two conditions of a one-round knock-out victory: at least 50% of the votes in the first round and no less than 20% of the votes in half of the country s 32 provinces. Some 80 million votes have been counted so far, while about 100 million of the 155 million voters had taken part in this historic election. Now that SBY has to face a second round on September 20, the crucial question is who he will square off with. Institute of Defence and Strategic Studies, NTU, South Spine, Block S4, Level B4, Nanyang Avenue, Singapore 639798. Tel. No. 67906982, Email: wwwidss@ntu.edu.sg, Website: www.idss.edu.sg.

ATTENTION: The Singapore Copyright Act applies to the use of this document. Nanyang Technological University Library 2 Round II will be a totally different ballgame a fight to the finish in which all gloves are off. A bloody outcome is not unlikely, especially if followers of the losing side prove bad losers. Already, many people are beginning to worry about the prospect of a thin margin of victory, and the high number of spoilt votes, which can lead to disputes and further uncertainty, if not violence. Despite his popularity, SBY s camp is actually not too pleased that the retired general has not been able to score a one-round knockout. The stark truth is that, as popular as he may be now, there is no certainty SBY will eventually win in Round II. This is the brutal fact about Indonesia s first direct presidential election. Megawati and Wiranto are both claiming to have won the second spot to qualify for the second round, based on their own party s count of the votes. Although Megawati has the better chance, either of them will be a tough rival to beat. Scenario I: SBY versus Megawati A showdown between SBY and Megawati will be a clash between two Cabinet colleagues turned bitter rivals, following SBY s less than friendly departure from the Cabinet, which propelled him into the presidential race. Because of the rivalry, both will go all-out to kill each other s chances. They will do so by winning over as much support as possible from the losing candidates and their train of followers. The new battle cry will be Asal Bukan SBY (ABS) or Anything but SBY for Megawati s followers, and Asal Bukan Mega (ABM) or Anything but Mega for SBY s. Who both sides get to win over will depend on what incentives they can successfully dangle. In this context, the most crucial support will be that of Golkar, which together with the National Awakening Party (PKB) of Abdurrahman Wahid (Gus Dur), formed the backbone of Wiranto s presidential bid. Golkar is the strongest party in the new parliament (DPR), with 23% of the 500 seats, followed by Megawati s Indonesian Democratic Party of Struggle (PDIP) with 19%. SBY s Democratic Party (PD) has a weak DPR presence, with only 10% of the seats. Even with its two equally small allies, SBY s party can at most marshal 12% of the DPR seats. So, in this scenario, Golkar s support is crucial to form a stable government a fact which both SBY and Megawati realise, which explains the current scramble for Golkar s support, in return for key cabinet seats and other forms of political advantage. SBY is using the popularity of Jusuf Kalla, a former Golkar leader, to swing Golkar leaders over. Clearly like a bride being wooed by many suitors, Golkar has 3 options: form an alliance with SBY or form an alliance with PDIP. If neither works, it will go into opposition. But the prospect of a Golkar alliance with SBY is slim for two reasons: Firstly, Golkar chairman Akbar Tanjung is more inclined to team up with PDIP. A PDIP-Golkar alliance will form a strong bloc in parliament to check an SBY-led government. Secondly, many Golkar leaders are also furious with Jusuf Kalla for abandoning his own party at the eleventh hour to strike an alliance with SBY. Kalla was one of the early Golkar contenders for presidential candidacy before he jumped ship. If SBY fails to get Golkar, he will be forced to turn to Amien Rais and Hamzah Haz the last two in the five-horse presidential race. Amien Rais is closer to SBY than to Megawati and many of his supporters have also voted for SBY. As for Hamzah Haz, his supporters are more inclined to Megawati and Wiranto than to SBY because of SBY s perceived image as a proxy of the United States. This image will be exploited to weaken SBY s chances in the second round. In fact, the missiles have already been fired, as seen in the 9 July front-page headline story in Kompas suggesting the outgoing Cabinet s concern about foreign intervention in the current election.

ATTENTION: The Singapore Copyright Act applies to the use of this document. Nanyang Technological University Library 3 Scenario II: SBY versus Wiranto Megawati has a better chance of getting into Round II, but should she fail because Wiranto beats her as the second highest vote-getter in Round I, it will be a shoot-out between two generals in a penultimate fight for the presidency. Wiranto will reap from the rivalry between Megawati and SBY. Her PDIP will throw its weight behind Wiranto just to kill off SBY s chances of a victory. Support for Wiranto from Golkar will strengthen although this had been half-hearted during the first round election. Wiranto can also count on the support of Gus Dur s PKB and its followers. The PKB draws it support from members of the traditionalist Islamic body, Nahdatul Ulama (NU). Although NU has been pulled in different directions when its key leaders joined Golkar and PDIP as vice-presidential candidates, Gus Dur s influence remains strong. With Golkar, PDIP and PKB behind him, Wiranto will be a tough contender to beat. He may also win over several smaller parties representing the Islamic constituency. Wiranto however has several weaknesses which he knows SBY can exploit: For one, Akbar Tanjung s camp would not be too unhappy if Wiranto lost because of a possible purge of this faction should Wiranto win the presidency and push for control of Golkar. For another, Wiranto may also not be able to secure the full support of Amien Rais many of whose supporters voted for SBY. This was the case with the Justice and Prosperity Party (PKS), even though the party issued an edict to give full support to Amien Rais. So on balance, it will be a close fight between the two retired generals, with SBY having the edge. But if SBY is destined to be Indonesia s next president, it will not be a shoo-in for him. Yet, a victory for Wiranto in this scenario will not be a total surprise simply because the two biggest parties Golkar and PDIP are likely to team up against SBY. Conclusion SBY and his running mate, Jusuf Kalla, are clearly a popular pair as Indonesia s next president and vice-president. The SBY-JK combination has proven a lethal one, drawing support from across the country, and even sucking away the traditional voters of many political parties and NGOs. According to the LP3ES-NDI poll, 30% of Golkar s voters and 13% of PDIP s supporters voted for SBY-JK. In addition, SBY-JK won over 28% of Gus Dur s PKB and Hamzah Haz s United Development Party (PPP), 24% of PKS and 10% of Amien Rais National Mandate Party (PAN). But despite all his popularity and the direct support of some 38 million people that cuts across party lines and ethnic as well as religious affiliations, SBY may actually lose the race eventually, defeated by the brutality of alliance politics. This is the paradox of Indonesia s first direct presidential election. But should he win, SBY will still have a weak government. That is why he is rushing to form a viable coalition that can withstand a potentially hostile parliament. In short, SBY may be Indonesia s strongest elected leader since the fall of Suharto, but he may also be its weakest Chief Executive. It will be difficult, though not impossible, for him to avoid being hostage to barter politics a practice that actually contributed to the fall of Gus Dur and the weakness of the Megawati government. One way for him is to go for a limited coalition with just a few parties that are truly supportive of him. SBY s last option is to bypass the problem entirely by forming a government that is filled with independent, non-party professionals, taking the risk of facing a hostile parliament that will stall his every policy. He may do this because he cannot be easily impeached under new parliamentary rules. But it will be a weak SBY-led government, nonetheless. In the end, an SBY-led government may turn out to be the weakest since the fall of Suharto. That is why some are already predicting that his government may not last two or three years, just like Gus Dur s, or Megawati s. In short, Indonesia s first

ATTENTION: The Singapore Copyright Act applies to the use of this document. Nanyang Technological University Library 4 direct presidential election will not end Indonesia s problems in political transition. Indeed, we can expect leadership challenges or shake-ups in many political parties, especially those which have failed to win. Akbar Tanjung, Amien Rais, Hamzah Haz and even Megawati will not see the end of their troubles, even if they succeed in checking SBY s government. So the lakon, or drama, is hardly over. The post-suharto transition will take at least another direct presidential election in 2009 before the dust of change finally settles. * Yang Razali Kassim is an IDSS Senior Fellow who was in Jakarta to observe the July 5 presidential election.