Case 4:13-md YGR Document Filed 05/26/17 Page 1 of 16 EXHIBIT 25

Similar documents
Case 4:13-md YGR Document Filed 05/26/17 Page 1 of 28 EXHIBIT 9

Case 4:13-md YGR Document Filed 05/26/17 Page 1 of 17 EXHIBIT 26

Case 4:13-md YGR Document Filed 05/26/17 Page 1 of 20 EXHIBIT 34

Case 4:13-md YGR Document Filed 02/08/18 Page 1 of 38 EXHIBIT EE

Case 4:13-md YGR Document Filed 05/26/17 Page 1 of 37 EXHIBIT 32

Case 4:13-md YGR Document Filed 05/26/17 Page 1 of 6 EXHIBIT 51

Case 4:13-md YGR Document Filed 05/26/17 Page 1 of 6 EXHIBIT 49

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY IN RE: LIQUID ALUMINUM SULFATE ANTITRUST LITIGATION. Civil Action No. 16-md-2687 (JLL) (JAD)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY. 1. I am a member of the law firm of Lieff Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein, LLP

Case 4:13-md YGR Document Filed 05/26/17 Page 1 of 6 EXHIBIT 65

Case 4:13-md YGR Document Filed 09/08/16 Page 1 of 7

Case 4:13-md YGR Document 2322 Filed 05/16/18 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case 4:13-md YGR Document 1292 Filed 05/26/16 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA OAKLAND DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA OAKLAND DIVISION

Case 4:13-md YGR Document Filed 09/29/16 Page 1 of 5

RESOLUTION NO le A RESOLUTION BY THE CITY TO AUTHORIZE A CONTRACT WITH PARKER AND ZEGA, PLC TO PROVIDE LEGAL SERVICES TO THE CITY

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 4:13-md YGR Document 2104 Filed 12/22/17 Page 1 of 50

Holzer & Holzer, LLC ATTORNEYS AT LAW

Case 4:13-md YGR Document 1714 Filed 03/20/17 Page 1 of 17 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA OAKLAND DIVISION

Case 4:13-md YGR Document Filed 02/08/18 Page 1 of 13 EXHIBIT D

PREVIEW PLEASE DO NOT COPY THIS DOCUMENT THANK YOU

EXHIBIT 14. Case 2:09-cv LA Filed 06/09/15 Page 1 of 8 Document

Case4:11-cv YGR Document22 Filed02/16/12 Page1 of 5

DISTRICT COURT, FAMILY DIVISION CLARK COUNTY, NEVADA

THOMAS E. ELFERS, ESQ. Law Office of Thomas Elfers S.W. 148 Lane, Miami, Florida Office (305)

Case3:10-md RS Document Filed03/16/15 Page1 of 13

Case 2:08-cv DMC-JAD Document Filed 07/02/13 Page 1 of 119 PageID: Exhibit 7D

Case 1:12-cv WHP Document 79 Filed 05/05/16 Page 1 of 4

PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT (Contingent Fee Special Counsel for Environmental Litigation)

Case3:12-cv SI Document93-3 Filed01/10/14 Page1 of 7

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF ALAMEDA

You Could Get Money From $44.95 Million in Settlements A Federal Court authorized this Notice. This is not a solicitation from a lawyer.

CURRENT APPLICATION: Fees Requested: $ (September 1, 2002-December 18, 2002) Expenses Requested: $

Case 3:16-cv WHO Document Filed 06/30/17 Page 1 of 7

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON COUNTY OF KING

STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER

Attorneys for Defendant GOOGLE INC. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 3:14-cv VC Document Filed 12/16/16 Page 1 of 7

LITIGATION ATTORNEY-CLIENT FEE AGREEMENT

Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company

IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS BELMONT COUNTY, OHIO. : Plaintiff : vs. : FINAL PRETRIAL ORDER : Case No. Defendant :

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF ALAMEDA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA GREENWOOD DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION

DAVIS WRIGHT TREMAINE LLP

Case3:06-md VRW Document738-5 Filed07/07/10 Page1 of 8

For Preview Only - Please Do Not Copy

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

Case 1:05-md JG-JO Document Filed 04/11/13 Page 1 of 18 PageID #: EXHIBIT 3

Case 3:17-cv LB Document 87 Filed 03/28/18 Page 1 of 6

APPENDIX 5: SAMPLE LIMITED SCOPE LEGAL SERVICES RETAINER AGREEMENT (No. 1)*

CITY OF ROHNERT PARK CDC AGENDA ITEM TRANSMITTAL REPORT

CONTRACT FOR INTERIM CITY ATTORNEY SERVICES CITY OF BEAUMONT & SLOVAK BARON EMPEY MURPHY & PINKNEY LLP

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, CENTRAL CIVIL WEST ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 2:14-cv SJO-FFM Document 281 Filed 07/19/18 Page 1 of 32 Page ID #:4897

Instructions for Completing Contract. *Complete the blanks of the contract ** Initial bottom of each page and initial & sign the last page of contract

Case KG Doc 553 Filed 09/17/18 Page 1 of 16 IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

Case 3:14-cv REP-AWA-BMK Document Filed 08/15/18 Page 1 of 4 PageID# 9893

Return form to: THE FLORIDA BAR Fee Arbitration Program 651 East Jefferson Street Tallahassee, FL

AGENDA REPORT. Subject: AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF BEVERLY HILLS AND

SUPREME COURT OF COLORADO

CONTINGENCY FEE RETAINER AGREEMENT & AUTHORITY TO REPRESENT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

SEXUAL ASSAULT, SEXUAL HARASSMENT AND EMPLOYMENT CONTINGENCY ATTORNEY-CLIENT RETAINER AGREEMENT

Schedule 3 Costs allowable for work done and services performed

Case3:07-md SI Document7414 Filed12/21/12 Page1 of 9

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case 3:17-cv LB Document 77-3 Filed 03/09/18 Page 1 of 18

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case 3:15-cr BAS Document 166 Filed 03/02/17 PageID.752 Page 1 of 8

Dated: Dated: DEFINITIONS

Case 3:07-cv JST Document 5169 Filed 06/08/17 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SCRU IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI I. In the Matter of the Amendment. of the

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA (OAKLAND DIVISION)

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS

Case KJC Doc 500 Filed 10/22/18 Page 1 of 14 IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE.

Association of Workplace Investigators Training Institute RETENTION AGREEMENTS. By: Pamela L. Hemminger

Case4:13-cv JSW Document112 Filed05/05/14 Page1 of 3

For Preview Only - Please Do Not Copy

APPENDIX I SAMPLE INTERROGATORIES

being preempted by the court's criminal calendar.

IMPORTANT PLEASE READ THIS CAREFULLY!

PACIFIC LEGAL FOUNDATION. Case 2:13-cv KJM-DAD Document 80 Filed 07/07/15 Page 1 of 3

Case 1:16-cv AJN Document 176 Filed 06/26/17 Page 1 of 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Case 4:11-cv Document 198 Filed in TXSD on 05/31/13 Page 1 of 6

REPRESENTATION AGREEMENT

CITY OF DUNNELLON, FLORIDA CITY ATTORNEY CONTRACT #AGR THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into as of its Effective Date, by

OJCC No: GDAL DIA: 06/26/2017 JUDGE: Daniel A. Lewis FINAL ORDER ON ATTORNEY'S FEES AND COSTS (FEE AMOUNT HEARING)

Case M:06-cv VRW Document 424 Filed 02/04/2008 Page 1 of 5

Case 2:16-cv Document 1 Filed 12/05/16 Page 1 of 23 Page ID #:1

Case 3:10-md RS Document Filed 04/03/17 Page 1 of 15

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE VIRGIN ISLANDS APPELLEE'S MOTION FOR FEES. Appellee, Mohammad Hamed, hereby requests attorneys' fees pursuant to V.I.

Case 4:16-cv CW Document 75-2 Filed 08/14/18 Page 1 of 11

NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. [Complaint Filed 11/24/2010] [Alameda County Case No.

Case 3:06-cr LAB Document 378 Filed 09/01/07 Page 1 of 3

Transcription:

Case 4:13-md-02420-YGR Document 1813-25 Filed 05/26/17 Page 1 of 16 EXHIBIT 25

Case 4:13-md-02420-YGR Document 1813-25 Filed 05/26/17 Page 2 of 16 1 Counsel for Indirect Purchaser Plaintiffs 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA OAKLAND DIVISION 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 IN RE: LITHIUM ION BATTERIES ANTITRUST LITIGATION This Document Relates to: ALL INDIRECT PURCHASER ACTIONS Case No. 13-MD-02420 YGR (DMR) MDL NO. 2420 DECLARATION OF GEORGE RIKOS IN SUPPORT OF INDIRECT PURCHASER PLAINTIFFS MOTION FOR AN AWARD OF ATTORNEYS FEES AND REIMBURSEMENT OF EXPENSES ON BEHALF OF LAW OFFICES OF GEORGE RIKOS 28 DECLARATION OF GEORGE RIKOS IN SUPPORT OF IPPS MOTION FOR AN AWARD OF ATTORNEYS FEES AND REIMBURSEMENT OF EXPENSES ON BEHALF OF LAW OFFICES OF GEORGE RIKOS No. 13-md-02420-YGR (DMR)

Case 4:13-md-02420-YGR Document 1813-25 Filed 05/26/17 Page 3 of 16 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 I, George Rikos declare: 1. I am the principal of the Law Offices of George Rikos, Counsel for Indirect Purchaser Plaintiffs ( IPPs or Plaintiffs ) in this action. I submit this declaration in support of IPPs Motion for an Award of Attorneys Fees and Reimbursement of Expenses. I make this declaration based on my personal knowledge and if called as a witness, I could and would competently testify to the matters stated herein. 2. My firm has served as counsel to Bradley Van Patten and as counsel for IPPs throughout the course of this litigation. The background and experience of Law Offices of George Rikos and its attorneys are summarized in the curriculum vitae attached hereto as Exhibit A. 3. Law Offices of George Rikos has prosecuted this litigation solely on a contingentfee basis, and has been at risk that it would not receive any compensation for prosecuting claims against the defendants. While Law Offices of George Rikos devoted its time and resources to this matter, it has foregone other legal work for which it would have been compensated. 4. During the pendency of the litigation, Law Offices of George Rikos performed the following work: Preparing of client for deposition, meeting with client in preparation of further document production; participation in remote collection of search for potential responsive documents; analysis of proposed responses to third set of interrogatories; meet with client to discuss responses to third set of interrogatories, analysis of settlement agreements and approval of same. 5. Attached hereto as Exhibit B is a billing summary of Law Offices of George Rikos total hours and lodestar, computed at current billing rates, from June 1, 2013 to February 28, 2017. Counsel for Plaintiffs are not seeking attorneys fees for any time billed prior to the appointment of lead counsel. See Order dated May 17, 2013 (ECF No. 194). The total number of hours spent by Law Offices of George Rikos during this period of time was 8.5, with a corresponding lodestar based on current rates of $2,762.50. The lodestar amount reflected in Exhibit B is for work assigned by Lead Counsel, and was performed by professional staff at my 27 28 DECLARATION OF GEORGE RIKOS IN SUPPORT OF IPPS MOTION FOR AN AWARD OF ATTORNEYS FEES AND REIMBURSEMENT OF EXPENSES ON BEHALF OF LAW OFFICES OF GEORGE RIKOS Case No. 13-md-02420-YGR (DMR) 1

Case 4:13-md-02420-YGR Document 1813-25 Filed 05/26/17 Page 4 of 16 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 law firm. This summary was prepared from contemporaneous, daily time records regularly prepared and maintained by Law Offices of George Rikos 6. Attached hereto as Exhibit C is a list of the various billing rates each attorney and staff member at my firm has billed at in this case. 7. Attached hereto as Exhibit D is a compilation of my firm s detailed records at historical billing rates. The entries in Exhibit D have been redacted per the Court s Order in ECF No. 1803. 8. Attached hereto as Exhibit E is a summary of the expenses Law Offices of George Rikos has incurred during the course of this litigation. Law Offices of George Rikos expended a total of $400 in unreimbursed costs and expenses in connection with the prosecution of this case. These expenses were incurred on behalf of IPPs by Law Offices of George Rikos on a contingent basis and have not been reimbursed. The expenses reflected in Exhibit E were prepared from expense vouchers, receipts, and bank records, and thus represent an accurate recordation of the expenses incurred. 9. I have reviewed the time and expenses reported by Law Offices of George Rikos in this case which are included in this declaration, and I affirm that they are true and accurate. 17 18 19 20 I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on May 26, 2017 at San Diego, California. 21 22 23 /s/ George Rikos George Rikos 24 25 26 27 28 DECLARATION OF GEORGE RIKOS IN SUPPORT OF IPPS MOTION FOR AN AWARD OF ATTORNEYS FEES AND REIMBURSEMENT OF EXPENSES ON BEHALF OF LAW OFFICES OF GEORGE RIKOS Case No. 13-md-02420-YGR (DMR) 2

Case 4:13-md-02420-YGR Document 1813-25 Filed 05/26/17 Page 5 of 16 1 2 3 4 ATTESTATION I, Steven N. Williams, hereby attest, pursuant to United States District Court, Northern District of California Civil Local Rule 5-1(i)(3), that concurrence to the filing of this document has been obtained from the signatory hereto. 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 By: /s/ Steven N. Williams Steven N. Williams 28 DECLARATION OF GEORGE RIKOS IN SUPPORT OF IPPS MOTION FOR AN AWARD OF ATTORNEYS FEES AND REIMBURSEMENT OF EXPENSES ON BEHALF OF LAW OFFICES OF GEORGE RIKOS Case No. 13-md-02420-YGR (DMR) 3

Case 4:13-md-02420-YGR Document 1813-25 Filed 05/26/17 Page 6 of 16 EXHIBIT A

Case 4:13-md-02420-YGR Document 1813-25 Filed 05/26/17 Page 7 of 16 Exhibit A I have been a licensed attorney in the State of California for approximately 18 years. My practice has primarily focused on litigation. During the course of my 18 years of practice I have been certified lead counsel in a class action lawsuit.

Case 4:13-md-02420-YGR Document 1813-25 Filed 05/26/17 Page 8 of 16 EXHIBIT B

Case 4:13-md-02420-YGR Document 1813-25 Filed 05/26/17 Page 9 of 16 IN RE: LITHIUM ION BATTERIES INDIRECT REPORTED HOURS AND LODESTAR AT CURRENT HOURLY RATES Firm Name: Law Offices of George Rikos Reporting Period: June 1, 2013 through February 28, 2017 Categories: (1) Investigations, Factual Research (2) Drafting Discovery Requests (3) Drafting Discovery Answers/Responses (4) Deposition Taking (5) Deposition Defending (6) Discovery Meet & Confer (7) Document Review (8) Drafting Pleadings, Briefs & Pretrial Motions (9) Reading/Reviewing Pleadings, Briefs, Discovery, Transcripts, etc. (10) Class Certification/Experts (11) Litigation Strategy, Analysis & Case Management (12) Negotiating Settlements (13) Trial and Trial Preparation (14) Court Appearance and Prep (P) Partner (A) Associate (LC) Law Clerk (PL) Paralegal (L) Librarian ATTORNEYS 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 TOTAL HOURS CURRENT HOURLY RATE TOTAL LODESTAR George Rikos 2.60 4.50 1.40 8.50 $325.00 $2,762.50 Name (P) 0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Name (P) 0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Name (OC) 0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Name (A) 0.00 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 $0.00 $0.00 SUB-TOTAL 0.00 0.00 2.60 0.00 4.50 0.00 1.40 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 8.50 $2,762.50 NON-ATTORNEYS Name (PL) 0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Name (LC) 0.00 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 $0.00 $0.00 SUB-TOTAL 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 $0.00 GRAND TOTAL: 0.00 0.00 2.60 0.00 4.50 0.00 1.40 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 8.50 $2,762.50

Case 4:13-md-02420-YGR Document 1813-25 Filed 05/26/17 Page 10 of 16 EXHIBIT C

Case 4:13-md-02420-YGR Document 1813-25 Filed 05/26/17 Page 11 of 16 EXHIBIT C In re Lithium Ion Batteries Antitrust Litigation LAW OFFICES OF GEORGE RIKOS ATTORNEYS DATE RANGE HOURLY RATE George Rikos 2013-2017 $325 NON-ATTORNEYS DATE RANGE HOURLY RATE

Case 4:13-md-02420-YGR Document 1813-25 Filed 05/26/17 Page 12 of 16 EXHIBIT D (REDACTED)

Case 4:13-md-02420-YGR Document 1813-25 Filed 05/26/17 Page 13 of 16 Law Offices of George Rikos 225 Broadway Suite 2100 San Diego, CA 92101 Phone: (858) 342-9161 Fax: (858) 724-1453 Account Statement Prepared for Brad Van Patten Re: Van Patten v. Panasonic Previous Invoice Amount $0.00 Last Payment Received $0.00 Previous Balance $0.00 Current Charges $3,162.50 Total Due $3,162.50

Case 4:13-md-02420-YGR Document 1813-25 Filed 05/26/17 Page 14 of 16 Law Offices of George Rikos 225 Broadway Suite 2100 San Diego, CA 92101 Phone: (858) 342-9161 Fax: (858) 724-1453 Brad Van Patten Invoice Date: May 26, 2017 Invoice Number: 10176 Invoice Amount: $3,162.50 Matter: Van Patten v. Panasonic Attorney s Fees 2/2/2016 Prepare for deposition G.R. 4.50 $1,462.50 4/13/2016 Meeting with in preparation of further G.R. 1.90 $617.50 document production (.8); 4/25/2016 Receipt and analysis of proposed response to third G.R..40 $130.00 set of interrogatories (.1); 5/23/2016 Telephone conference with G.R..30 $97.50 1/10/2017 Review and analysis of G.R..90 $292.50 1/16/2017 Review and analysis of G.R..40 $130.00 1/18/2017 Prepare email to co-lead counsel Ben Siegal G.R..10 $32.50. SUBTOTAL: 8.50 $2,762.50 Costs 4/28/2017 Original Filing Fee (October 2012) with Southern District of California $400.00 SUBTOTAL: $400.00 TOTAL: $3,162.50 PREVIOUS BALANCE DUE: $0.00 CURRENT BALANCE DUE AND OWING: $3,162.50

Case 4:13-md-02420-YGR Document 1813-25 Filed 05/26/17 Page 15 of 16 EXHIBIT E

Case 4:13-md-02420-YGR Document 1813-25 Filed 05/26/17 Page 16 of 16 EXHIBIT E In re Lithium Ion Batteries Antitrust Litigation LAW OFFICES OF GEORGE RIKOS Reported Expenses Incurred on Behalf of IPPs EXPENSE REPORT AMOUNT CATEGORY INCURRED Attorney Service Litigation Assessment Court Fees (Filing, etc.) $400 Document Production Experts/Consultants Federal Express Transcripts (Hearing, Deposition, etc.) Investigation Lexis/Westlaw Messenger/Delivery Photocopies In House (capped at $0.20 per copy) Photocopies Outside Postage Service of Process Supplies Telephone/Telecopier Travel Miscellaneous TOTAL: $400