NEMEROVSKI BOBERTSON &FALK HOWARD CANADY RICE HAND DELIVERY

Similar documents
Robert L. Ebe Daniel M. Wall Three Embarcadero San Francisco, CA Telephone: (415)

Magnavox v. Activision

fit May 3, 1985 The Honorable Charles A. Legge United States District Court 450 Golden Gate Avenue, 19th Floor San Francisco, California 94102

United States District Court for the Northern District of California ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) ) Defendant. REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION TO DEFENDANTS

ANDERSON & OLSON. Plaintiffs, Defendant. 24 I, Charles S. Paul, being duly sworn, do depose and

PATENTS, TRADEMARKS AN D COP YRIGHTS SU ITE 3400 F"OUR EMBARCADERO CENTER SAN FRANC ISCO. CA LI F"ORNIA ( 41S)

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT

,j.'!t!j!.f!f:!----memoi<andum----

Enclosed are copies of the following documents which were recently received: PP.E'l'RIAL STATEMENT OP DEFENDANT ACTIVISION 1 INC.

Case 5:14-cv BLF Document 798 Filed 09/26/18 Page 1 of 7

UNITED STATES INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION

Case 2:13-cv JAK-AGR Document 457 Filed 12/07/15 Page 1 of 12 Page ID #:13889

Case3:12-mc CRB Document45 Filed01/02/13 Page1 of 6

ou1 PRELIMINARY MEMORANDUM October 12, 1979 Conf. List 1, Sheet 1 Appeal to DC ED VA. (Merhige, Bryan [CJ]) (Warringer, concurring and dissenting)

Case 5:08-cv JW Document 49 Filed 02/05/2009 Page 1 of 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SAN JOSE DIVISION

Supreme Court of Virginia v. Consumers Union of the United States, Inc.

Case 3:06-cv JSW Document 203 Filed 02/12/2008 Page 1 of 6

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. Petitioners, Real Parties in Interest.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

No. S IN THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA. KRISTIN M. PERRY et ai., Plaintiffs and Respondents,

FLORIDA UTILITY SERVICES 1, LLC 3336 GRAND BLVD. SUITE 102 HOLIDAY, FL ::r. November 7, 2016

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Plaintiff, Defendants. COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

May 11, I. Breach of the Settlement Agreement

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

Affirmation of Howard Cotton Exhibit 1

Case 8:11-cv FMO-AN Document 193 Filed 10/16/15 Page 1 of 5 Page ID #:4291

Judicial Assistant s > ALWAYS copy opposing counsel(s) on correspondence to the Court

Case 2:04-cv ABC-Mc Document 171 Filed 05/01/06 Page 1 of 6 Page ID #:126. UNITED STATES DISTRICT ( ClJIr1o;.~"';rj[~J!"";m1. Defendants.

HOROWITZ LAW GROUP PLLC

Case3:09-cv RS Document78 Filed05/03/11 Page1 of 7

Judicial Practice Preferences Circuit Civil/Section 11

Case3:11-cr WHA Document40 Filed08/08/11 Page1 of 10

April 10, 1986 , MONGELLO, MARSHALL AND SANTORO. M. Welby Moon CA000708O

CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER

Defendant and Counterclaim Plaintiff.

Please reply to: Joyia Z. Greenfield Zachariah R. Tomlin May 6, 2016

Case3:12-cv VC Document28 Filed07/01/14 Page1 of 11

Case5:08-cv PSG Document498 Filed08/15/13 Page1 of 6

FILED: KINGS COUNTY CLERK 03/27/ :49 PM INDEX NO. 3189/2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 69 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/27/2018

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION

Case 3:06-cv JSW Document 122 Filed 10/30/2006 Page 1 of 15

Case: /08/2009 Page: 1 of 2 DktEntry:

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

Case3:12-cv VC Document21 Filed06/09/14 Page1 of 12

U.S. District Court North Carolina Middle District (Durham) CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 1:96-cv RCE

~/

Case4:07-cv PJH Document567-1 Filed12/11/09 Page1 of 59 EXHIBIT A

ffinrvr MOTION FOR APPROVAL OF UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SETTLEMENT WITH DEFENDANTS

December 15, Dear Justice Singh: VIA ECF LITIGATION

LARRY BOWOTO, ) ET AL., ) ) PLAINTIFFS, ) ) VS. ) NO. C CAL ) CHEVRON CORPORATION, ) ) DEFENDANT. ) )

Case 5:14-cv BLF Document 795 Filed 09/04/18 Page 1 of 7

STIPULATION FOR JOINT APPENDIX. KAMALA D. HARRIs Attorney General of California. DOUGLAS J. WOODS Senior Assistant Attorney General

Case 3:06-cv JSW Document 174 Filed 10/31/2007 Page 1 of 6

Request for Publication

April 26, Honorable Paul D. Ryan Speaker of the House of Representatives Washington, DC Dear Mr. Speaker:

Case4:10-cv CW Document205 Filed11/02/12 Page1 of 6

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA Civil Division : : : : : : : : : PLAINTIFFS FIRST SET OF INTERROGATORIES

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO. The parties hereby submit to Magistrate Judge Cousins the attached Joint

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

Case 1:12-cv MGC Document 35 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/26/2012 Page 1 of 3

Woods et al v. Vector Marketing Corporation Doc. 276 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MEMORANDUM AFTER TRIA

c.s. 868 ",I"' P1~r VIA FEDERAL EXPRESS May 16, 16J4

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SEVENTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR BROWARD COUNTY, FLORIDA

Honorable Judge Thomas Ramsberger 545 First Avenue North, Room 200 St. Petersburg, FL JURY TRIAL WEEKS * ALL ONE (1) WEEK DOCKETS *

SUPREME COURT OF ALABAMA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

ACACIA RESEARCH CORPORATION

March 11, Re: Realtek Semiconductor Corp. v. LSI Corp. et al., No Panel: Judges Farris, Reinhardt & Tashima

YOU ARE A MEMBER OF A CLASS ACTION READ THIS NOTICE CAREFULLY

ooa Efiiing Attorneys for Plaintiffs UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

Case: 1:13-cv Document #: 35 Filed: 09/13/13 Page 1 of 5 PageID #:130


ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFFS UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

) rslu ) CHRISTOPHER HUBBARD, Defendant. )

Case 3:12-cv AJB-BGS Document 1 Filed 12/04/12 Page 1 of 7

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. No TODD S. GLASSEY AND MICHAEL E. MCNEIL,

Case 8:11-cv JST-JPR Document Filed 08/16/13 Page 1 of 6 Page ID #:5240

Case 4:15-cv PJH Document Filed 10/25/16 Page 1 of 5

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO KA COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BRIEF FOR THE APPELLEE

Case 3:06-cv JSW Document 136 Filed 12/04/2006 Page 1 of 8

CHARLES EDWARD CLARK Attorney at Law 225 S. Lake Ave. Suite 300 Pasadena, CA (626)

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF S MOTION TO AMEND AND FOR LEAVE TO ADD CLAIM FOR PUNITIVE DAMAGES

No IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT DOTCONNECTAFRICA TRUST,

This matter came on regularly before this Court for hearings on October 7,2004 and on April

Case5:08-cv PSG Document519 Filed08/22/13 Page1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION

Notice of Motion and Motion to Consolidate Related Actions Against

No [DC# CV MJJ] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEAL FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. RUSSELL ALLEN NORDYKE; et al., Plaintiffs - Appellants,

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BEFORE THE FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION

1900 M Street, NW, Ste. 250, Washington, D.C

Case: Document: Page: 1 Date Filed: 07/28/ UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

Bernards Township, et al. advs The Hills Develpment Co. Docket No. L P.W.

Case: , 11/17/2017, ID: , DktEntry: 36, Page 1 of 12 No IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF NEWTON COUNTY, ARKANSAS CIVIL DIVISION THE ARKANSAS POLLUTION CONTROL AND ECOLOGY COMMISSION'S RESPONSE TO NOTICE OF APPEAL

Case 9:16-cv RLR Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/14/2016 Page 1 of 8

Case GMB Doc 207 Filed 12/21/13 Entered 12/21/13 14:45:36 Desc Main Document Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

Golden v Lininger 2010 NY Slip Op 32187(U) August 16, 2010 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: /09 Judge: Jane S. Solomon Republished

HAROLD P. STURGEON, Plaintiff and Petitioner, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, et al., Defendants and Respondents, and

Transcription:

Law Offices Of HOWARD RCE NEMEROVSK CANADY BOBERTSON &FALK A Professional Co,.,oratzon HENRY W HOWAJtO DEN S T RCE HOWARD N NEMEitOVSK RC HARD W C ANA O"'' A A'1.1ES ROBERTSON UO"-"E 8 FALK fr RAY... to,._d P HAAS HOBERT E COOO'G 1M '1.1 "-RT"'- R CliCK l.o\\'\ RE,CE:. 8 RABK' ""'ll "-"1 T HL 'TTO' ')fl:\ E'- l "tayer 8AR8AR.A COROO:\ JA\ES l. LOPES DRK :\. C,CHE'-K._ '\:"'... HOMAj A l "RSE'-o: 'ti(hael 0 fac"' ST VF' E.:;( HO~! " ' ".,PEAR') Jr.. ''-E"':'H C HAL'i\otA~ 1-f fo'jeph ESCHER ll f>..za!eth S SAlVEc;.o' H VATH~ 'toore PFTER 8LSCH RO... A LO H 'STAR DA,._it.l \,.lk'jr.. E EFfRE'Y l SCHAFFER l.y'l'l P HART.,ARAH K HOF'iTA OT[R MARLA "flt.t.et \.\ARK 0 WHATlEY A LAN W SPARER T HERESE M $T;WART CHARLES p ORTME Y R Jt..:LJA P crus PETU COH' '1"RTHA Jr.. Ct.'"'~CH"'-1 0"'\1 COOO\'\l' '-'CHAU OA.'--"HER A'-ET A '\E\0' CHARLOTTE \... A \0' Tl~tOTHY ~ \t. C A "o'\ /O,A THA' H Hl.l BFH /AMES C '00'-A"" LAt...Rf\,C[ fo rt..'lcra' E:THA"' P ~CitLl'~'- 8ER'\AR0 A!JL R.._ rooo E rho,u ~., <. -4.-HER'[ \.1 1\TE -'' HORACE;,.. '-ASH ROBERT H '1'-0C'"-" "'' BRC<. \'.-4.'1''\E H Cll.BERT OF COt..S~EL THREE EMBARCADERO CENTER SEVEl\'TH FLOOR SAN FRANCSCO CA 4111 415/ 434-loOO TELEX & TWX -372-72 TELECOPY 415-3-3041 February 27, 186 HAND DELVERY Deborah Weissman, Esq. Law Clerk Judge Legge's Chambers U.S. District Court 450 Golden Gate Avenue, 1th Floor San Francisco, CA 42 Re : Magnavox v. Activision Case No.: C- 82-5270 CAL Dear Ms. Weissman: enclose a revised proposed o rder in connection with Activision's Motion for Stay of Accounting Pend ing Appeal and a revised proposed Judgment. The revised proposed order reflects t hat the motion for stay was heard on February 5, 186 rather than February 28, 186; the revised proposed J udgment reflects Judge Legge's statement at the Status Conference regarding the entry o f f o rmal conclusions of law. will appreciate it if you would suc stitute these revised documents for the ones we filed earlie r. Thank you for your help. S incerely ycurs, MJM:cal Encl. MARLA J. M:...LER Attorneys for ACT VSON, NC. cc: Robert L. Ebe, Esq. (by hand) Theodore W. Anderson, Esq.

1, 2 :1 6 7 8 j 1 UNTED STATES DSTRCT COURT 'LmRTH ERN DSTRCT OF CALFOR.'HA 11 THE MAGNAVOX COMPANY, a corporation, No. C 82 5270 CAL and SANDERS ASSOCATES, NC., a corporation, ORDER STAY NG ACCOUNTNG PENDNG APPEAL Plaintiffs, vs. ACTV SON, NC., a corporation, Defendant. AND RELATED CROSS- ACTON. 2 : 2w lj 24 :1 25 il 26 q This matter came on for hearing o n February 5, 186, the parties appearing through their respe c tive attorneys of record. Based on the written and oral ar; uments presented, and for good cause sho\-.rn, T S HEREBY ORDERED that 1. Activision, nc.'s ;lotion for Stay of Accounting Pending Appeal is g ranted. This action is stayed pending the

1 outcome 2 :! Appeals of Activision's interlocutory appeal to the Court o f for the Federal Circuit, provided that Activisio n s hall 3 post a bond in the amount o f!;; ------------------ 4 Dated: ' 186 5 6 7 CHARLES A. LEGGE U. S. DSTRCT J UDGE 8 11 15 16 17 ' 18 il 1 il J il 20!, 21,, 22 j! 23!' lj 24 ij 25 1 26!' ORDER - 2- STAYNG ACCOUNTNG PENDNG APPEAL

,, i 3 4 5 ~ a) 1 1 UNTED STATES DSTRCT COURT NORTHERN DSTRCT OF CALFORNA THE MAG&~AVOX COMPANY, a corporation, and SANDERS ASSOCATES, NC., a corporation, Plaintiffs, ~o. C 82 52 70 CAL JUDGUENT (EXCEPT FOR ACCOUNTNG ) ACTVSON, NC. a corporatio n, 18 i: ' 1 ' 20 1 1, 21 'l!' 22. 23! 24 25 26 Defendant. AND RELATED CROSS-ACTON The issues ~n this case, other t han damages, were tri e d t o this Court sitting without a jur y and were submitted. The court has reviewed all of the exhibits admitted into evidence, and has heard and reviewed the testimony o f the witnesses. On December 27, 185 the Court made and e ntered Findings of Fac t,

1 i and on 2 of Law., 186 the Court ~ade and entered Conclusions The Findings of Fact and Conclusions o f Law are the basis of this Judgment. 31 t is hereby adjudged that: l. Activision, nc. ( " Activision" ) has not sustained 6 its bur den of proving that any of claims 25, 26, 51, 52, or 60-62 7 of U.S. Patent Re. 28, 507 ("the '507 patent" ) is invalid. 8 i 11 15 16 2. Activisio n has c ontributed t o the infringement, and induced infringement, of the ' 507 patent by the manufacture and sale of its Tennis, ce Hockey, Boxi ng, Fishing De rby, Stampede, Pressure Cooker, Grand Prix, Barnstorming, Sky Jinks, Enduro, and Decathlon television game cartridges. 3. Activision has directly infringed the '507 patent by use and display of tho se television game cartridges. 4. Activision did not willfully infringe the '507 patent and proceeded at all relevant times in the good faith 17 18!i,, 1 il,, ::>Q! - 21! 22 23 2.1 1 1 li 25 26 belief that its products did not infringe any app l icable patent. DATED: 5. This Judgment is final except for an accounting. ----------------' 186-2- JUDGMENT (EXCEPT FOR ACCOUNT NG) CHARLES A. LEGGE U. S. DSTR CT COURT JUDGE